Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Of
CEAT Ltd.
&
Century Plyboards (India) Ltd.
Group Assignment
PROGRAMME: MBA (FT)
Batch: 2019-2021 Term-II
Corporate Finance-II
Introduction 2
Page 1 of 16
INTRODUCTION
CEAT Ltd, the premier company of RPG Enterprises, of a whopping 22,000 rupees is
Headquartered at Mumbai, was founded in 1958. Today, CEAT is one of India's leading tire
manufacturers and has a strong presence in the world market. CEAT produces more than 15
million tires and offers a variety of tires for all segments and produces world-class radial tires
for: heavy trucks and buses, small commercial vehicles, ground equipment, forklift truck,
transport trailers, cars, motorcycles and scooters.
Century Ply has been the first indicator of implementing existing workforce strategies. This
simple philosophy is essential in all our technological fields. It led us to formulate and
disseminate the myths of modern life. Their award-winning product has redefined real estate in
India and has brought a revolution in the concept of residential space. Century Ply is the
unprecedented choice of architects and interior designers. From flexible plywood that offer a
unique blend of form and functionality to specially treated, Fire Retardant plywood that find use
in a myriad of construction purposes, they have the right products to target different building
needs.
Page 2 of 16
Part-A
OPERATING CYCLE & CASH CYCLE
Operating Cycle = Inventory Period + Receivables Period
• CEAT Ltd
Receivables
Turnover 9.119111657 9.40417184 10.45159794 8.633250493 7.882428173
Page 3 of 16
Cash Cycle 34.38105296 38.16644054 39.9722474 44.77718214 51.00541254
Page 4 of 16
COMPETITORS OF CEAT LTD:
• MRF LTD
Inventory
turnover 7.32 10.83 6.2 6.47 6.19
Inventory
period 49.86339 33.70268 58.87097 56.41422 58.96607
Opening
payables 1568.51 1408.37 1126.15 810.24 708.74
Closing
Payables 1709.38 1568.51 1408.37 1126.15 810.24
Average
payables 1638.945 1488.44 1267.26 968.195 759.49
Payable
turnover 6.895426 7.016657 6.877135 13.45135 12.70089
Operating
cycle 96.86339 66.70268 112.871 108.4142 112.9661
Page 5 of 16
• JK TYRES & INDUSTRIES LTD
Receivables
Period 68 68 85 74 72
Inventory
turnover 6.61 5.98 7.01 7.89 8.07
Inventory
period 55.21936 61.03679 52.06847 46.26109 45.22924
Operating
cycle 123.2194 129.0368 137.0685 120.2611 117.2292
Opening
payables 1165.38 1213.74 955.37 1054.53 1053.23
Closing
payables 1599.02 1165.38 1213.74 955.37 1054.53
Average
payables 1382.2 1189.56 1084.555 1004.95 1053.88
Payable
turnover 5.241269 4.813442 4.401898 4.195291 4.789996
Page 6 of 16
COMPETITORS OF CENTURY PLYBOARD (INDIA) LTD
• GREENPLY INDUSTRIES LTD:
Receivables
Period 79 114 65 74 60
Inventory
turnover 7.05 4.68 11.22 10 5.1
Page 7 of 16
Payable turnover 4.680360215 4.175618272 4.821516526 5.951714962 4.132903508
CEAT LTD
Company in the last year was able to reduce its operating cycle slightly, to around 115 days
which is due to the reduction in the account receivables period of around 52 days in year
ending 2019. Overall it has been quite stable in maintaining its operating cycle and has
started showing signs of achieving operational efficiency as can be observed by the reduction
in its operating cycle. It is also doing better than its close competitor JK Tyres & Industries
which had an operating cycle of around 123 days in 2018-19 but it is still behind MRF Ltd
which had achieved an impressive 66 days operating cycle in 2018.
CEAT has also been able to maintain a stable cash cycle over the years and has been better
than its competitors MRF and JK tyres in 2019 with an impressive figure of 34 days which
on further introspection showed that CEAT has high payables period which helps it keep
lower cash cycle and retain more cash for its operations.
Century Plyboard had cash cycle of 141 days in 2019 which is very high when compared to
its competitors Greenply with a cash cycle of just 19 days and Archidply with a cash cycle of
122 days in 2019. Greenply has been outperforming both its competitors as they have very
high payables period which helps them in retaining cash for their business operations
whereas it does not show healthy signs for Century Plyboard which has the lowest payables
period out of the three and hence would require external sources of funding to finance its
operations.
Page 8 of 16
Part-B
WORKING CAPITAL FINANCING POLICY
As we know working capital shows a firm’s short-term liquidity and it is calculated as follows-
Working capital financing policy deals with sources and amount of working capital a firm should
maintain.
It is a risky policy as under this policy fluctuating as well as the permanent current assets is
financed through short term debts. Under this policy debt is collected on time however payment
to creditors is made as late as possible. Current assets are proportionately low here.
As opposed to aggressive policy, under this policy relatively higher proportion of long-term
sources are used to finance current assets. Current assets are high here. Working capital is
financed more through current assets.
Page 9 of 16
It follows Conservative working capital
policy as it is evident from balance sheet that
the current assets amounted to 82,232.69 lacs
Century Plyboards (India) Ltd while current liabilities amounted to
66,261.39 lacs as at March 31,2019. For the
past five years the company follows the same
trend i.e. following conservative policy to
finance its working capital. The company uses
current assets more to finance its working
capital.
Page 10 of 16
The sources of short-term borrowings of the
company are loans repayable on demand which
include loans from banks (secured) that includes
Indian currency loan of 1447.14 lacs and foreign
Century Plyboards (India) Ltd currency loan of $3063.10 lacs and Corporate
bodies which is amounted to 8.90 lacs as at
March 31, 2019.
Part-C
TO CHECK POSSIBILITY OF SHORT-TERM SURPLUS
ALONG WITH/ WITHOUT SHORT TERM BORROWINGS
Ceat Ltd. (amount in Rs lacs)
FY 2018-19:
The company is currently having a negative net working capital which shows that they have
chosen a very aggressive policy by getting as much borrowings as possible and a decrease in
investments. As we can observe there is no short-term investment done and a lot of money is
spent on borrowings. This may result in a company not being able to fulfil its short-term
obligations. This is a pattern followed from previous year.
FY 2017-18:
The company showed negative working capital after many years where you can clearly see the
disparity between the money invested in the short run compared to the huge amount borrowings.
The short-term borrowings have increased a lot compared to the previous years and investment
have decreased significantly. This shows the change from conservative to an aggressive working
capital policy.
Page 11 of 16
FY 2016-17:
The company has shown an increase in working capital which can be attributed to the increased
number of current inventories which shows that a lot of demand was not fulfilled and company
should be more aggressive in the next year to push more units. There has been an increase in
both the short-term borrowings and investments.
FY 2015-16:
The company has made a dramatic decrease in current transactions which has made a big
decrease in both Short term borrowings and investment but since the decrease has caused
investments to be more than borrowings it didn’t result in a big change in the net working
capital.
FY 2014-15:
Here there is a lot of more short-term investments than borrowings which shows a more
conservative form of working capital policy which gave the result of a positive net working
capital.
FY 2018-19:
Page 12 of 16
FY 2017-18:
FY 2016-17:
FY 2015-16:
FY 2014-15:
The working capital policy and the strategy over the years for the company has been more or less
the same over the span of 5 years. It is a very aggressive policy of working capital as we can
observe there is next to nil short-term investments over the years and a lot of borrowing takes
place which indicates the aggressive working capital policy.
Page 13 of 16
TREND AND ITS ANALYSIS
Analyzing the proportion of investment of current assets versus fixed asset for the past five
years we get:
• Ceat Ltd.
CEAT Ltd
4,500 4,194
4,000
3,500 3,233
3,011
3,000
2,526
2,500 2,356
2,122 2,045
1,974
2,000 1,739
1,581
1,500
1,000
500
0
FY2014-15 FY2015-16 FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
As can be clearly seen in the bar chart above that fixed assets have seen a higher amount of
investment than the current assets. For the FY 2014-15 the difference between the investment in
the current assets and fixed assets wasn’t much, but it has increased continuously thereafter.
CEAT Ltd.
The above table shows the ratio of fixed assets to total assets and also the ratio of current assets
to total assets. In all the financial years it can be observed that the ratio fixed assets to total assets
has been higher than the ratio of current assets to total assets.
Page 14 of 16
CEAT Ltd. FY2014-15 FY2015-16 FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
From the above table which shows the %change in fixed assets and current assets it can be
observed that the growth in the current assets has been more for the company between the years
2014-2017. But there has been a sharp growth In the FY 2018-19 for the fixed assets.
400 358
279
200
0
FY2014-15 FY2015-16 FY2016-17 FY2017-18 FY2018-19
As can be clearly seen in the bar chart above that fixed assets have seen a higher amount of
investment than the current assets. For the FY2018-19 the difference between the investment in
the current assets and fixed assets wasn’t much. This is because the difference between the
current assets and fixed assets of the company has been continually decreasing from FY2014-15.
Page 15 of 16
Fixed Assets/Total Assets 0.26 0.30 0.39 0.45 0.48
The above table shows the ratio of fixed assets to total assets and also the ratio of current assets
to total assets. In all the financial years it can be observed that the ratio current assets to total
assets has been higher than the ratio of fixed assets to total assets.
From the above table which shows the %change in fixed assets and current assets it can be
observed that there has been an decrease in the current assets of the company while on the other
hand the fixed assets of the company increased with a huge % from FY2014-15 to FY2016-17,
but has decreased for the FY2017-18 and FY2018-19.
Comparative analysis
From the analysis of the data of the above two companies we can clearly see that for CEAT Ltd.
has more total current assets than fixed assets, while in the case of Century Plyboards (India)
Ltd. The case is opposite, Century Plyboards (India) Ltd. Has more total fixed assets than the
total current assets.
This means that century Plyboards has been investing in long term assets development rather
than short term assets development.
Page 16 of 16