Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
This is the Big (crisis) one – Human, Economic, Financial (HEF). It’s Human
and personal–will influence consumer behavior; it’s Economic–deep, will
linger and shift demand/business dynamics; and it’s Financial–will alter
markets, valuation frameworks. And, it’s as local as it is global. The Tech
bust (2000) and GFC (2008) were lesser, but changed the decades that
followed. This one, with the virus still running riot, will be deeper,wider
and more painful. We lend perspectives and a playbook to play through.
Policy push: The need, the lag and the likely recovery
The market’s sharp fall has been matched, if not surpassed, by the global policy
response–aggressive rate/liquidity measures, 5-10% GDP fiscal pushes–with ‘whatever
it takes’ commentary. India, however, so far, lags–some market liquidity support, some
state government fiscal promises and a task force for a fiscal push. It needs a lot more;
there’s plenty of monetary room, little option on the fiscal front and while India’s
Aditya Narain
COVID-19 spread has been modest so far, policy has lagged. This could weigh on India’s +91-22-6620 3061
relative economic and business damage, and eventually, the market’s recovery. aditya.narain@edelweissfin.com
The COVID-19-driven dislocation is in its early days. It’s still early to call the trajectory of the
virus’ spread, early to estimate the economic damage in terms of its length, the damage to and
Financial markets are collateral the reconfiguring of businesses. It’s also only a start in terms of the policy response that one is
damage of health and economic beginning to see across countries and India,the specifics and the likely changes that one will
challenges… see as the virus settles. While the markets have reacted sharply thanever before and remain
volatile, the uncertainty of the virus and the ultimate economic reconfiguration suggestit’s also
early days to decisively or confidently call the market is in either direction. The same applies to
stocks even as it is time to look at long-term shifts that are likely to follow.
95
85
75
65
Jan 20 Feb 20 Mar 20
India EMs DMs
Source: Bloomberg, Edelweiss research
So, are markets taking it all upfront and could they be over-reacting? By their very nature,
Markets reflect a lot of economic markets discount the economic loss and further risks upfront; that is why the sharp reaction.
pain ahead–but too much or too But, have they over or under reacted is hard to call; infections are still on the rise, its
little? trajectory and antidote are still conjecture and its economic damage is hard to extrapolate.
That there are aggressive policy offsets underway with more likely (and needed) on the anvil,
makes it near impossible to call the markets with any strong logic or certainty. So the
markets reflect a lot of economic pain ahead, but too much or too little?
Chart 2: US retail sales suffered a sharp contraction during GFC… …Impact oneconomic activity much higher this time
5 10
5
0
0
(5)
(%, YoY)
(5)
(%, YoY)
(10) -12% (10)
(15) -13%
(15)
-15% (20) -20%
(20) (25)
Mar 08 Jun 08 Sep 08 Dec 08 Mar 09 Feb 19 May 19 Aug 19 Nov 19 Feb 20
US retail sales US IIP
China retail sales China IIP
Source: Bloomberg, Edelweiss research
But, while the levels are relatively difficult to call, we do believe there are characteristics of
the Indian economy that will drive the impact–shorter term–and the possible implications
over the long term. We believe: a) The near 40% rural economy provides a relative hedge–
its dynamics are different and the virus spread is likely to be less impactful; b) A relatively
higher share of services–similar near-term impact vis a vis manufacturing (taking shut-
Relative impact on India’s growth
downs). But could see downward reset in the longer term; c) A net commodity importer
could be a little more modest and
with prices likely to be fundamentally set lower (particularly oil), India should lose a little
spread than most EMs and some
less than a lot of peer EMs; d) A modest capital markets component in India’s savings
DMs
profileis likely to limit the negative wealth effect that is likely to ripple through some
segments; e) Only moderate exports dependence,which we see being significantly
impacted,will also moderate the impact of this challenge. That said, the relatively large
share of informal workers will, however, limit employment protection and effective income
loss, lay-offs could be very front-endedand sharp.
We would argue that the relative impact on India’s growth could be a little more modest
and spread out than most EMs and some DMs, but there will be real pain and how it plays
out and the resets that happen will determine the overall impact on growth.
India has, however, not moved so far, excluding a few RBI-led liquidity enhancing measures.
It needs to do a lot more, and quickly. We would argue that it has significant headroom on
the monetary front; with a 5.15% repo rate, inflation falling rapidly and deflationary risks
setting in, India probably has monetary room than any other market–easy 100-200bps rate
cuts in the current context.
India’s policy response, so far, has
been timid–monetary & fiscal–and We also believe it needs to be more interventionist across the credit market and
it’s important to act, particularly participants. While the central bank held back in intervening in the NBFC crisis or offering
given India’s fairly extreme any back-stops, the current virus-led environment is significantly more challenging and the
economic shutdown need and downside risks have only risen.
India’s fiscal options are fewer,its need possibly higher. While India is already sitting on a
3.5% plus fiscal deficit, which will almost necessarily slip on account of the economic shut
down,there is a pressing need to provide fiscal support to the challenge ahead. We have
been arguing for a fiscal stimulus to get growth back; it’s now needed to moderate the
inevitable and sharp fall in growth that lies ahead. We believe this is particularly so because
India was at a low even going into the crisis–sub 5% growth, a significantly challenged
banking sector and diminished risk appetite across banks, corporate and individuals.
How much and how? We would believe a 2-4% (USD50-100bn) of GDP push is needed over
the next few months. We also believe its execution and allocation will need to be, amongst
others, banking sector loan extensions and moratoriums–small and large businesses–
indirect tax rate relaxations on basics. The economic pain will be most directly and
immediately felt by the contractual informal part of the economy and some direct income
support for a limited period is needed.
In addition, while the government has been reluctant to directly support specific
industries,we would argue it has been sub-optimal and precipitated some of the economy’s
current challenges. Infact, the large fiscal stimulus imparted during GFC–over 3.5% of GDP
helped Indian economy recoverquickly–and suggests it has and does work well.
Table 2: Dealing with the GFC— A variety of fiscal and monetary measures were announced
Particulars Post GFC
Fiscal stimulus (as % of GDP) 3.5
Excise duty cuts 0.9
Food and fertilizer subsidy 0.9
Pay commission 0.6
Rural development 0.4
Farm loan waiver 0.4
Others 0.3
Monetary stimulus
CRR cut 400bps
SLR cut 100bps
Repo rate cut 425bps
Source: Edelweiss research
Towards that end we would believe back-stops, credit supports and tax breaks are needed
for labour-intensive industries and those impacted by the lockdowns–travel, tourism,
transportation and a few others. We also believe there is a need,in the current
environment,to back-stop large corporate / financial failures if they arise. This has been
India’s starting point of growth is damaging to jobs, credit and corporate confidence, and in a higher risk and weaker
significantly lower than in GFC economic environment, could further weigh on an already stressed environment.
India has been hit by the virus when it was already low; a surging pandemicand a slow
&lagging response only raisethe downside risks.
Even on the earnings front, current momentum remains weak. When GFC struck, earnings
had posted 25% CAGR in the previous five years, significantly higher than the 5% earnings
CAGR in the five years preceding COVID-19. Hence, to that extent, ability of corporate to
absorb the shock is rather limited.
10
(10)
(20)
9MFY20
FY04
FY06
FY07
FY09
FY10
FY12
FY13
FY15
FY16
FY18
FY19
FY03
FY05
FY08
FY11
FY14
FY17
Chart 4: India and MSCI EM fell during GFC… …Chart 5: Current Nifty fall
105 105
95
85 95
(rebased to 100)
(rebased to 100)
75
85
65
55
75
45
35
65
Dec 07 Mar 08 Jul 08 Oct 08 Jan 09
Jan 20 Feb 20 Mar 20
Nifty MSCI EM Local Currency Nifty MSCI EM Local Currency
Source: Bloomberg, Edelweiss research
India’s bond yields have largely mirrored US this time too,but without the RBI cutting, so far.
Chart 6: India and US bond yields during GFC Chart 7: India and US bond yields currently
10 4.5 6.7 1.9
6.6 1.7
9 4.0
6.5 1.5
8 3.5
6.4 1.3
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
7 3.0 6.3 1.1
6.2 0.9
6 2.5
6.1 0.7
5 2.0
6.0 0.5
Dec 07 Mar 08 Jul 08 Oct 08 Jan 09
Jan 20 Feb 20 Mar 20
India 10Y G-sec US 10Y G-sec - RHS India 10Y G-sec US 10Y G-sec - RHS
Source: Bloomberg, Edelweiss research
The INR had consistently under-performed peers. This time it is outperforming, so far. This
could further weigh on economic activity and India’s export competitiveness.
100 98
95
96
(x)
(x)
90
94
85
80 92
INR underperformed
peers during GFC
75 90
Dec 07 Mar 08 Jun 08 Sep 08 Dec 08 Mar 09 Jan 20 Jan 20 Feb 20 Feb 20 Mar 20 Mar 20
The equity market had narrowed through the GFC. This time it’s been narrowing into the
crisis; should get narrower still.
Chart 10: Rally was narrow with Nifty stocks gaining the most Chart 11: Rally has been narrow this time around as well
65 65
60 60
55 55
50 50
45 45
Dec 07 Mar 08 Jun 08 Sep 08 Dec 08 Mar 09 Dec 17 Jul 18 Feb 19 Sep 19 Mar 20
The market has got cheaper,but even before the earnings cuts have come, it’s still more
expensive than at the GFC bottom.
Chart 12: Valuations have compressed sharply, but still higher than GFC levels
28
24
20
(x)
16
12
8
Mar 00 Mar 02 Mar 04 Mar 06 Mar 08 Mar 10 Mar 12 Mar 14 Mar 16 Mar 18 Mar 20
Nifty trailing PE ratio Long Term avg +1SD -1SD
The markethad taken a year from its top to the bottom, consolidated for under six months
and then retouched its highs in less thantwo years. This time, the fall has been sharperand
Market valuations still haven’t hit at the lows (not necessarily the bottom) and with economic damage ahead, the reflation
GFC lows could be more laboured. We broadly classify market movements into four phases and
discuss the same in the section below–lead in, capitulation, consolidation and reflation.
Chart 13: Characterizing market rally into different phases during GFC
5,000 8
(Index, x)
(%)
4,000 7
3,000 6
2,000 5
Sep 07 Mar 08 Sep 08 Mar 09 Sep 09 Mar 10
NIFTY Index 10Y bond yield (RHS)
1) Lead in phase: Rate sensitive’s get sold off as central banks tighten
This is a phase which occurs in a late stage of a bull cycle when central banks tighten
Lead inphase similar to rates aggressively to curb overheating. In this phase, rate sensitives and midand small
2018/H1FY19 market movements caps get sold off. It’s basically a phase where valuation strength gets tested and those
where rate sensitivessold off segments of markets where valuations are high face the maximum brunt. This is a
phase triggered by rising interest rates.It is somewhat similar to the 2018-19 phase in
India, where midcap, NBFC andauto valuations corrected, although the broader market
remained flat. The polarisation was more pronounced this time around.
Table 4: GFC: The early tremors – Rate sensitives and hot stocks get sold This time, it occurred during 2017-19 phase
1Y prior to Nifty Liquidation phase 2017 2017-19
Sector Name
Peak performance Performance Performance
Telecom 75 -43 Nift smallcap 50 -33
Utilities 201 -42 Metals 38 -31
Nift smallcap 89 -41 Telecom 34 -29
Industrials 101 -40 Discretionary 24 -26
Financials 100 -39 Utilities 14 -18
Metals 147 -39 Healthcare -7 -17
Nifty Midcap 87 -38 Nifty Midcap 43 -17
Nifty 60 -26 Industrials 39 -7
Discretionary -1 -24 MSCI India 31 6
Energy 111 -22 Financials 44 13
Consumer Staples 26 -11 Consumer Staples 30 21
IT -23 -2 IT 27 26
Healthcare 5 10 Energy 50 28
Source: Bloomberg, Edelweiss research
This is a phase that we are currently going through, although the pace of fall is much
sharper this time around than GFC (perhaps reflecting more economic near-term pain).
Table 5: Capitulation phase– We all fall down… …that’s where we are right now
Capitulation phase
Sector Name Capitulation phase (GFC) Sector Name
(current)
Table 6: Consolidation phase – Metals, energy, dividend yield, cash-rich companies bounce first
Sector Name Consolidation phase
Telecom (23)
Financials (13)
Healthcare (13)
Nift smallcap (11)
Nifty Midcap (10)
IT (8)
Consumer Staples (7)
Industrials (4)
MSCI India (2)
Energy 8
Metals 12
Utilities 12
Discretionary 14
In all these phases one thing stands out– levered companies were the last to recover and, to
that extent,bore maximum brunt of the crisis.
We do not argue for too much shuffling in the midst of the current market mayhem. We do,
however, believe that we are in the market capitulation phase–with wild unpredictable
We would look to buy dividend swings driven by the virus’ spread, market liquidity and other dynamics and policy responses.
yield/cash-rich companies and It is unwise to try and remodel a portfolio with such significant stock price swings.
become UW on financials once the
dust settles We do believe that as the virus’ trajectory and the market’s dust settles, the market should
enter consolidation phase, which will give the opportunity and the time to emphasize the
portfolio. We also expect it to be a little longer than the GFC consolidation phase in large
measure because the likely economic impact will be greater this time, and such underlying
IT, pharma and telecom likely to be refixes take longer than market ones. To that extent, there will be merit in changing the
sector leaders in the next cycle portfolio stance once the market starts settling at its new, lower levels.
Sectors best suited to this phase are pharmaceuticals, IT services and telecom. These
sectors should structurally see a leg up for their businesses over an extended period of time
and should play through to valuations. We are already OW in these sectors and would look
to add to them once market movements stabilise.
The sectors that we would seek to switch would be financials from a long held OW to
what should become UW. We are holding back in the immediate term because of the very
sharp price erosion and so a rebound is a real possibility. But, beyond that, we see the
sector straining on bearing a large part of the economic pain of this crisis in the form of
asset quality, the likely further moderation of growth that should follow and the risk of
socialization of the economy’s likely pain on account of this. In contrast, consumer staples,
outperforming in the recent past, will likely see the least business damage as businesses and
stocks. We will seek to gradually raise our exposure to these stocks in our portfolio.
Chart 15: Strategy portfolio performance since inception Chart 16: Strategy portfolio performance since last change
40 0
30 (5)
20 (10)
10 (15)
(%)
(%)
0 (20)
(10) (25)
(20) (30)
(30) (35)
Sep-17 Mar-18 Sep-18 Mar-19 Sep-19 Mar-20 Mar 20 Mar 20 Mar 20 Mar 20 Mar 20 Mar 20
Strategy Portfolio Nifty Strategy Portfolio Nifty
Source: Bloomberg, Edelweiss research
Edelweiss Securities Limited, Edelweiss House, off C.S.T. Road, Kalina, Mumbai – 400 098.
Board: (91-22) 4009 4400, Email: research@edelweissfin.com
ADITYA
Digitally signed by ADITYA NARAIN
Aditya Narain DN: c=IN, o=EDELWEISS SECURITIES LIMITED,
ou=SERVICE,
2.5.4.20=3dc92af943d52d778c99d69c48a8e0
c89e548e5001b4f8141cf423fd58c07b02,
Head of Research
NARAIN
postalCode=400011, st=MAHARASHTRA,
serialNumber=e0576796072ad1a3266c27990
f20bf0213f69235fc3f1bcd0fa1c30092792c20,
aditya.narain@edelweissfin.com cn=ADITYA NARAIN
Date: 2020.03.24 20:21:50 +05'30'
Recent Research
Date Title
All price charts cannot be included given the large number of companies in our coverage. Specific charts may be available upon request.
This Report has been prepared by Edelweiss Securities Limited in the capacity of a Research Analyst having SEBI Registration
No.INH200000121 and distributed as per SEBI (Research Analysts) Regulations 2014. This report does not constitute an offer or
solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. Securities as
defined in clause (h) of section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 includes Financial Instruments and Currency
Derivatives. The information contained herein is from publicly available data or other sources believed to be reliable. This report is
provided for assistance only and is not intended to be and must not alone be taken as the basis for an investment decision. The
user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. Each recipient of this report should make such investigation as it
deems necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in Securities referred to in this document (including the
merits and risks involved), and should consult his own advisors to determine the merits and risks of such investment. The
investment discussed or views expressed may not be suitable for all investors.
This information is strictly confidential and is being furnished to you solely for your information. This information should not be
reproduced or redistributed or passed on directly or indirectly in any form to any other person or published, copied, in whole or in
part, for any purpose. This report is not directed or intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or
resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction, where such distribution, publication, availability or use
would be contrary to law, regulation or which would subject ESL and associates / group companies to any registration or licensing
requirements within such jurisdiction. The distribution of this report in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law, and persons
in whose possession this report comes, should observe, any such restrictions. The information given in this report is as of the date
of this report and there can be no assurance that future results or events will be consistent with this information. This information
is subject to change without any prior notice. ESL reserves the right to make modifications and alterations to this statement as
may be required from time to time. ESL or any of its associates / group companies shall not be in any way responsible for any loss
or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report. ESL is committed
to providing independent and transparent recommendation to its clients. Neither ESL nor any of its associates, group companies,
directors, employees, agents or representatives shall be liable for any damages whether direct, indirect, special or consequential
including loss of revenue or lost profits that may arise from or in connection with the use of the information. Our proprietary
trading and investment businesses may make investment decisions that are inconsistent with the recommendations expressed
herein. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance .The disclosures of interest statements incorporated in
this report are provided solely to enhance the transparency and should not be treated as endorsement of the views expressed in
the report. The information provided in these reports remains, unless otherwise stated, the copyright of ESL. All layout, design,
original artwork, concepts and other Intellectual Properties, remains the property and copyright of ESL and may not be used in
any form or for any purpose whatsoever by any party without the express written permission of the copyright holders.
ESL shall not be liable for any delay or any other interruption which may occur in presenting the data due to any reason including
network (Internet) reasons or snags in the system, break down of the system or any other equipment, server breakdown,
maintenance shutdown, breakdown of communication services or inability of the ESL to present the data. In no event shall ESL be
liable for any damages, including without limitation direct or indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, losses or
expenses arising in connection with the data presented by the ESL through this report.
We offer our research services to clients as well as our prospects. Though this report is disseminated to all the customers
simultaneously, not all customers may receive this report at the same time. We will not treat recipients as customers by virtue of
their receiving this report.
ESL and its associates, officer, directors, and employees, research analyst (including relatives) worldwide may: (a) from time to
time, have long or short positions in, and buy or sell the Securities, mentioned herein or (b) be engaged in any other transaction
involving such Securities and earn brokerage or other compensation or act as a market maker in the financial instruments of the
subject company/company(ies) discussed herein or act as advisor or lender/borrower to such company(ies) or have other
potential/material conflict of interest with respect to any recommendation and related information and opinions at the time of
publication of research report or at the time of public appearance. ESL may have proprietary long/short position in the above
mentioned scrip(s) and therefore should be considered as interested. The views provided herein are general in nature and do not
consider risk appetite or investment objective of any particular investor; readers are requested to take independent professional
advice before investing. This should not be construed as invitation or solicitation to do business with ESL.
Additional Disclaimers
This report is intended for distribution by Edelweiss Securities Limited only to "Major Institutional Investors" as defined by Rule
15a-6(b)(4) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Act, 1934 (the Exchange Act) and interpretations thereof by U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) in reliance on Rule 15a 6(a)(2). If the recipient of this report is not a Major Institutional Investor as
specified above, then it should not act upon this report and return the same to the sender. Further, this report may not be copied,
duplicated and/or transmitted onward to any U.S. person, which is not the Major Institutional Investor.
In reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Rule 15a-6 of the Exchange Act and interpretations thereof by the SEC
in order to conduct certain business with Major Institutional Investors, Edelweiss Securities Limited has entered into an
agreement with a U.S. registered broker-dealer, Edelweiss Financial Services Inc. ("EFSI"). Transactions in securities discussed in
this research report should be effected through Edelweiss Financial Services Inc.
In the United Kingdom, this research report is being distributed only to and is directed only at (a) persons who have professional
experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19(5) of the FSMA (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the
“Order”); (b) persons falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (including high net worth companies and unincorporated
associations); and (c) any other persons to whom it may otherwise lawfully be communicated (all such persons together being
referred to as “relevant persons”).
This research report must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment
activity to which this research report relates is available only to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant
persons. Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this research report or any of its contents. This
research report must not be distributed, published, reproduced or disclosed (in whole or in part) by recipients to any other
person.
This report is intended for distribution by ESL only to "Permitted Clients" (as defined in National Instrument 31-103 ("NI 31-103"))
who are resident in the Province of Ontario, Canada (an "Ontario Permitted Client"). If the recipient of this report is not an
Ontario Permitted Client, as specified above, then the recipient should not act upon this report and should return the report to
the sender. Further, this report may not be copied, duplicated and/or transmitted onward to any Canadian person.
ESL is relying on an exemption from the adviser and/or dealer registration requirements under NI 31-103 available to certain
international advisers and/or dealers. Please be advised that (i) ESL is not registered in the Province of Ontario to trade in
securities nor is it registered in the Province of Ontario to provide advice with respect to securities; (ii) ESL's head office or
principal place of business is located in India; (iii) all or substantially all of ESL's assets may be situated outside of Canada; (iv)
there may be difficulty enforcing legal rights against ESL because of the above; and (v) the name and address of the ESL's agent for
service of process in the Province of Ontario is: Bamac Services Inc., 181 Bay Street, Suite 2100, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2T3 Canada.