Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SUBMITTED BY
SAVEEZA KABSHA
SUBMITTED TO
MA’AM HINA QAYYUM
DATE
05-10-18
SEMESTER
SEVENTH
TABLE OF CONTENTS
intrinsic to something.
A court’s power to decide a case or issue a decree; A geographic area within which
such area.
In sum it may be said that the inherent jurisdiction of the court is a virile and viable
doctrine, and has been defined as being the reserve fund of powers, a residual source of
powers, which the court may draw upon as necessary whenever it is just or equitable to
do so, in particular to ensure the observance of due process of law, to prevent vexation or
oppression, to do justice between the parties and to secure a fair trial between them.
Both the terms i.e. “Inherent” and “jurisdiction” read together would mean a permanent,
essential and intrinsic power of a court to decide a case or issue a decree within the
limit or otherwise affect the inherent power of the Court to make such orders as
may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of
the Court.
deemed to limit or affect the inherent power of the High Court to make such
orders as may be necessary to give effect to any order under this Code; or to
prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of
justice.
The provisions of Order 36, Rule 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 confer
Section 151 in the Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C) had been present right from the
beginning i.e. 1908. However in the sub-continent, this concept of inherent powers
emerged later in criminal procedure. Civil Courts enjoyed this privilege right from
enactment of CPC because civil cases aren’t serious enough that there is apprehension of
criminal procedure was through Act XXV of 1861, followed by Act X of 1872 and Act X
of 1882. After experimenting for four years, present Act V of 1898 was enacted. After 25
years, law-givers identified shortcomings in this and found, inter alia, that situations did
arise which had not been foreseen by legislature for which no provisions existed in the
Code. It was for this reason that section 561-A was incorporated in 1923 through the
The purpose of inherent powers is to empower Courts (High Court in criminal cases;
Civil Courts in civil cases) is to cater to the lacunae in the Codes and to address every
type of situation. A legal maxim reads, ubi jus ibi remedium which is the very essence of
2
2015 P.Cr.L.J. 507, 480; 1996 P.Cr.L.J. 80; 1969 SCMR 325
3
PLD 2004 SC 298 (DB); 2009 YLR 252
INHERENT POWERS OF COURTS 5
circumstances.
The inherent powers of Courts under these sections are very wide but they aren’t
The courts can’t exercise their powers under these section in the matters when these
The High Court can quash the proceedings pending before any Criminal Court if the
If any Criminal Court passes an order, without having jurisdiction, then the High Courts
can exercise their powers under section 561-A Cr.P.C against such order.
If any complaint before a Criminal Code requires recording of evidence, then throwing
out of proceedings under section 561-A Cr.P.C without giving chance to the trial Court
to test the allegations by way of evidence made in the complaint, would not be proper.
Under section 561-A Cr.P.C, statements recorded in one case cannot be used to seek
Under section 151 C.P.C, High Court can, in appropriate cases, convert an application
The Law of Limitation will not bar the exercise of inherent powers.7
It is not the intention of Law that in exercise of inherent powers, the normal course of
4
PLD 2016 SC 55
5
2008 YLR 332, 2015 P.Cr.L.J. 205
6
1994 SCMR 771; P 2000 K 31
7
2014 MLD 625; P 2008 K 109; 1995 CLC 1529; P 1992 L 250
8
PLD 2010 Lah. 498
INHERENT POWERS OF COURTS 6
The High Court can exercise their jurisdiction under section 561-A Cr.P.C to quash
criminal proceedings before a Criminal Court if the Court has started Criminal
High Court, in exceptional cases, would exercise jurisdiction under section 561-A
Cr.P.C without waiting for trial Court to pass orders under section 249-A or 256-K
Administrative order can be challenged before High Court under section 561-A Cr.P.C.11
i.e. to secure the ends of Justice and purposes i.e. to secure the ends of
REFERENCES
Statutes
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898
Supreme Court Rules, 1980
Case Laws
2005 SCMR 1014
9
2014 P.Cr.L.J. 897
10
2014 MLD 599
11
2014 MLD 1059
INHERENT POWERS OF COURTS 7
P 1998 L 474
2015 P.Cr.L.J. 507, 480
1996 P.Cr.L.J. 80
1969 SCMR 325
PLD 2004 SC 298 (DB)
2009 YLR 252
PLD 2016 SC 55
2008 YLR 332
2015 P.Cr.L.J. 205
1994 SCMR 771
P 2000 K 31
2014 MLD 625
P 2008 K 109
1995 CLC 1529
P 1992 L 250
PLD 2010 Lah. 498
2014 P.Cr.L.J. 897
2014 MLD 599
2014 MLD 1059
Other Sources
Black’s Law Dictionary
Halsbury’s Laws of England