6.

1 Leakage flux and leakage inductance

  Leakage flux:
Leakage flux in the induction motor takes place because the current flows
through the core of the induction motor. It takes place due to the Eddy current at
the core also the airgap between the stator and rotor. The mutual fluxes take
place to the rotor winding by the self-fluxes as well as leakage fluxes.

As the air gap between the stator and rotor winding increases then the leakage
reactance decreases and thus the leakage flux increases.

 Leakage inductance:

Reactance due to rotor flux lines that do not couple with stator windings.

Reactance X2 in induction motor is equivalent circuit which represents the

referred form of leakage reactance.

Figure 1. Leakage Inductance

The further the distance of stator from rotor bar or part of a bar the greater its
leakage reactance since small percentage of rotor flux will reach the stator
windings.
If the bars of the cage rotor are placed near the surface of rotor, they will have
small leakage flux and X2 will be small.

If the bars of the cage rotor are placed deeper into the rotor surface, the leakage
will be more and X2 is large.
6.2 Slot leakage

Figure 2. Slot leakage

o The flux that follows the path from tooth to tooth across the slots as
shown in figure. In this process it links stator/rotor windings.
o The path of slot leakage flux is perpendicular to the main flux which
passes radially down the teeth and a small potion of it straight down the
slots.
o It is observed that small amount of magnetic leakage flux links bottom
conductors in slots than top conductors.
o The slot leakage is dependent upon the shape of slots. It is larger in semi-
closed slots used in induction machines.
6.3 Tooth-tip leakage

Figure 3. Tooth-tip leakage

 Leakage flux flows from the tip of one tooth to the adjacent tooth tip,
surrounding all conductors. This type of flux is more in machines where
airgap is larger.
 Airgap is very narrow hence tooth-tip flux is low e.g induction machine.

6.4 Zig-zag leakage:

Figure 4. Zig Zag leakage

o In the case of induction machines both the stator and rotor are slotted so
that some of the flux follows the path alternating between stator and rotor
teeth as shown in Figure.
 o This flux therefore alternately links conductors in stator and rotor slots and
is known as zig-zag leakage. Because of its nature it cannot be clearly
assigned to either the stator or rotor windings.
o It is considered that half of this flux links the stator winding while the other
half links the rotor winding. This type of Magnetic Flux Leakage is an
exclusive feature of the induction machine and its value is a function of
the percentage of the slot-pitch occupied by tooth in the rotor and stator
and upon the length of the air-gap.

6.5 Overhang leakage

Figure 5. Overhang leakage

This is the Magnetic Leakage flux which surrounds the end conductors of the
winding (stator/ rotor) as shown in Figure. Its path mainly lies through air but a
part of it is in the core-iron or the iron of end shields.

The amount of this leakage depends upon the proximity of conductors and their
relative location with respect to both the core and end-shields. This leakage is
generally small because of the large air paths involved.

6.6 Leakage reactance calculation for three phase machines.

 Figure 6. Effect of number of slots per pole per phase on leakage
flux.

Let Zs = conductors per slot

q = slots per pole per phase
p = number of poles
Tph = turns per phase.
Consider only the slot leakage flux and leakage reactance produced due to it. In
figure(a) shows the arrangement where there are 2 slots of each phase under
one pole. The width of each slot is Ws , the depth of the conductor portion is h
and each slot contains Zs conductors being 2Zs conductors of each phase under
one pole.

The leakage is directly proportional to specific slot leakage permeance. The

figure shows the slots of a phase under one pole. The conductors in slots of a
phase under a pole produce leakage flux has to traverse the slots of phase under
one pole.

If λs is the specific slot performance permeance the effective specific slot

performance for slots of a phase under one pole is λs/q as these permeance are
in series as shown in figure a. The conductors producing this leakage flux are :

T = conductors per slot x slots per pole per phase = Zsq

Reactance X = 2 π f T 2 L λ

Where L = length of slot

Now for conductors of a phase under one pole T = Zs q also λ = λ / q

Therefore, slot leakage reactance of conductors of phase under one pole = 2 π f

(Zs q) 2 L λ s / q

= 2 π f Zs2 L λ s q
If the conductor of a phase under all the poles are connected in series the slot leakage reactance per
phase

Similarly

Overhang leakage reactance per phase

Zigzag leakage reactance per phase

Tooth top leakage reactance per phase =

Problem:
A 3 phase 50Hz, 6 pole induction motor has 3 slots per pole per phase.
The stator core length is 0.12 cm and there are 225 turns per phase in
stator. Two alternative sizes of almost equal area fig(a) and (b) are
available for stator slots. Calculate the stator slot leakage reactance
per phase in each case and comment on the result. The machine has a
single layer winding.

Stator slots
From fig(a)
Specific slot permeance,

λs = µo[ h1/3Ws + h2/ Ws + 2h3/Ws + Wo + h4/Wo]

= 4 π x 10 -7
[ 28/ 3 x 10.5 + 1/ 10.5 + 2x3.5/10.5+3 + 1/3] = 23.1 x 10 -7
.

Stator slot leakage reactance per phase

xs=8 π f T ph 2
L ( λs / pq) = 8 π x 50 x (225)) 2
x 0.12 x 23.1 x 10 -7
/ 6 x 3 = 0.98
Ω
from fig(b)

λs = 4 π x 10 -7
[ 35/ 3 x 8.5 + 10.5/ 8.5 + 2x3.5/8.5+3 + 1/3] = 30.5 x 10 -7

The stator leakage reactance per phase

xs = 8 π x 50 x (225)) 2
x 0.12(30.5 x 10 -7 / 6 x 3) = 1.29 Ω

The leakage reactance in case of b is higher. Thus, a deep and narrow slot gives
high leakage reactance as compared with shallow and wide slot.
Problem:
A 3-phase 50 Hz alternator has parallel sided slots 0.6 m long and 20mm wide
and 100 mm deep. There are 8 poles with 4 slots per phase and 10 conductors
per slot.
The coils are full pitched and connected in series. Determine the leakage
reactance per phase due to the slot flux.
Solution:
Height of insulation = depth of slot – height of wedge- height of conductors.

= 100 – 20 – 60 = 20mm

The insulation is 10mm at the top and 10mm at the bottom of conductors with
the insulation between conductors being neglected.

Thickness of insulation is 10mm that is h2 = 10mm

It is given that h1 = height of conductor = 60mm

h3 = height of wedge = 20mm

width of slot = width of opening that is ws = w0 = 20mm

Specific permeance of slot =

λ s = µo [ h1/3Ws + h2/Ws + 2h3/ Ws +W0)

= 4π x 10 -7
[ 60/3 x 20 + 10/20 + 2 x 20/20+20 ] = 10 π x 10 -7
Total no of slots = 3 p q = 3 x 8 x 4 = 96
Total conductors = no of slots x conductors / slot = 96 x 10 = 960
Tph = z/6 = 960/6 = 160
Leakage reactance due to slot leakage

xs = 8 π f T ph 2
L ( λs / pq)

= 8 π x 50 x 160 2 x 0.6 (10 π x 10 -7

/ 8 x 4)

= 1.89 Ω
6.7 MMF calculation for air gap :
Usually MMF is required to overcome the reluctance of iron parts which is small
as compared to mmf required for airgap.

Consider the following points:

Length of air gap is not constant over the whole pole pitch . The length of airgap
at pole is more than the centre of the pole shoe. The ratio of average flux density
in airgap is aclled field form factor Kf.

This ratio is approximately same as the ratio of pole pitch in dc machine.

Figure 7. MMF for air gap

Kf = pole arc / pole pitch τ = B av / Bmax

Therefore the effective area of air gap

Age = Gap area x field form factor

Age = τp x L x Kf ; where L = gross length of armature.

Reluctance of airgap with slotted armature will be more as compared to smooth

armature machines because the length of air gap will increase due to slots on
the armature . This may be taken into account by considering factors for slots.
The reluctance of air gap with smooth armature
Consider a slotted armature with small airgap the flux is only confined therefore
effective slot pitch

Therefore the reluctance of the airgap with slotted armature .

Problem:

Calculate the mmf required for the air gap of a machine having core
length = 0.32m including 4 ducts of 10mm each pole arc=0.19m ; pitch
= 65.4 mm; slot opening = 5mm ; air gap length = 5mm; flux per pole =
52 m Wb. Given Carter’s co-efficient is 0.18 for opening/gap = 1 and is
0.28 opening/gap = 2.

Solution:

Ratio = slot opening/ gap length = 0.5 / 0.5 = 1

Therefore, Carter’s co-efficient for slots K gs = ys/ ys – KceWo

= 65.4 / 65.4 – 0.18 x 5 = 1.014

Ratio = duct width / gap length = 1/0.5 = 2.

Carter’s co-efficient for duct = Kcd = 0.28

Gap concentration factor duct =

-2
Kyd = L / L – KcdmdWd = 0.32 / 0.32 – 0.28 x 4 x 1 x 10 = 1.036.

Total gap concentration factor = Kv = 1.014 x 1.036 = 1.05

Flux density at the center of pole Bs = flux/pole / pole arc x core length

-3
= 52 x 10 / 0.18 x 0.32 = 0.854 Wb/m2 .

MMF required for air gap ATs = 800,00 x Kv x ls xLs

 -3
= 800,000 x 1.05 x 0.854 x 5 x 10 = 3587 A

A 175 MVA 2θ pole water wheel generator has a core of length 1.72 m
and diameter of 6.5 m . The stator slts have a width of 22mm , the slot
pitch being 64mm and air gap length at the center of the pole is 30mm.
There are 41 radial ventilating ducts each 6mm wide . The total mmf
per pole is 27000A. The mmf required for the air gap is 87% of total
mmf per pole. Estimate the average flux density in the air gap if the
field form factor is 0.7 .

The Carter’s co-efficient can be calculated from the following relationship :

Ks = 2/ π [ tan -1
y – 1/y log (1 + y2) ½
]

where y = Ws/lg for slots

= Wd/2 lg for ducts.

Ws,Wd are widths of slot and duct respectively and lg is the length of air gap.

Solution:

Ratio slot width / 2 (gap length) = y = 22/ 2 x 30 = 0.367.

Carter’s co-efficient for slots

Kg = ys / ys – Kav Ws = 64/64 – 0.176 x 22 = 1.1064

Ratio duct width / 2 (gap length) = y = 6 / 2 x 30 = 0.1

Carter’s co-efficient for ducts

Kcd = 2/π [ tan -1 0.1 – 1/ 0.1 [1 + 0.1 2 ] ½

= 0.05

Gap contraction factor for ducts

Kgd = L / L – Kcd nd Wd = 1720 / 1720 – 0.05 x 41 x 6 = 1.007

Total gap expansion factor = Ks = 1.1064 x 1.007 = 1.114

MMF required for air gap ATs = 0.87 x 27000 = 23490.

6.8 Calculation of stator teeth

The calculation of MMf for teeth is due to the following :

The teeth are wedge-shaped and result in varying flux density over the length of
teeth.
The teeth working as high flux density permeability is small and hence a small
portion of the airgap flux is diverted and passes through the teeth less than the
airgap flux.
The MMF requied for tapered teeth is calculated by the following methods:
Graphical method
Simpson’s rule
Flux density at 1/3 rd section.

Graphical method :

The mmf per metre for the whole length of tooth is not uniform as the flux
density is not same everywhere. Therefore, to obtain correctly the value of
total mmf it is necessary to construct graph showing in manner in which
ah varies over the length for the whole of the teeth.
The total mmf for the teeth is given by ∫ H dL the integrator being carried
out for the complete height of tooth.

Therefore the total mmf required for the tooth,

ATs = mean ordinate x height of tooth

= atmean x I1 = atmean x ds

To determine atmean it is necessary to construct graph showing the

manner in which flux density varies. From the known values of flux per tooth the
flux density is evaluated for number of sections along the tooth from tip to root.
The corresponding values of at from B-at curve of material are plotted. The value
of atmean is obtained from graph as shown.
Figure 8. B-at curve tapered tooth and calculation of atmean.

Simpson’s rule :
This method is applied to teeth of simple form and of small taper and is based on
the assumption that the curve relating ‘at’ with flux entity is a parabola.
In this method the vaues of at are obtained at three equidistant points , the ends
of the teeth and its center.

The mean value of at is given by

atmean = at1 + 4at2 + at3 / 6
where at1,at2,at3 are the values of at as shown in figure.
Figure 9. Calculation of atmean for tapered tooth using Simpson’s rule.

Flux density at 1/3 section. (Bt 1/3 )

This method is applied to teeth of small taper and based on the assumption that
value of at is obtained for flux density at a section 1/3 of tooth height from
narrow end is the mean of ‘at’ for the whole of the tooth. This method is most
simple and results accurate if the teeth are worked at low saturation.
Let Bt1/3 = flux density at 1/3 height from narrow end.
At 1/3 = value of mmf per metre for Bt1/3 as obtained from B-‘at’ curve.
Total mmf for teeth At = at1/3 x lt = at1/3 x dc.
Problem:
A laminated tooth of armature steel in an electrical machine is 30mm
long and has a taper such that the maximum width is 1.4 times the
minimum. Estimte the mmf required for a mean flux density of 1.9
Wb/m2 in this tooth. Use Simpson’s rule .

Let Wt1 , Wt2 and Wt3 be the maximum , mean and minimum widths of tooth
Wt1 = 1.4 Wt3
Wt2 = Wt1 + Wt3 /2 = 1.2 Wt3
Flux density at any section of tooth Bt = flux/tooth/ area of section
= flux/tooth ÷ net iron length x width of tooth
The flux density at any section of the tooth is inversely proportional to the tooth
width .
Let Bt1,Bt2,Bt3 be the minimum,mean and maximum flux densities.
Bt1 = Bt2 Wt2/ Wt1 = 1.9 x 1.2 / 1.4 = 1.63 Wb/m2
Bt2 = 1.9 Wb/m2
Bt3 = 1.9 x 1.2 = 2.28 Wb/m2
The B-at curve is plotted in Figure. From this curve the vaues of mmf per metre
for flux densities Bt1 = 1.63 Wb/m2 Bt2 = 1.9 Wb/m2 Bt3 = 2.28 Wb/m2
at1 = 4500 A at2 = 17000A and at3 = 100,500 A
Applying Simpson’s rule the mean value of mmf per metre
atmean = at1 + 4at2 + at3 / 6
= 4500 + 4 x 17000 + 100,500/6 = 28833 A/m.
-3
Total mmf required = atmean x l1 = 28833 x 30 x 10 = 865 A

A dc mchine has the following data :

Pole arc = 0.3 m , lengt of machine = 0.36 m , air gap = 8mm , slot pitch at the
air gap surface = 25mm, slot pitch at the bottom of slots = 25mm , depth of slot
= 60mm, width of slot = 12mm.
Number of ventilating ducts in armature width of each ventilating ducts
flux per pole

Figure 10. Details of dc machine.

Calculate :
a) Mmf required for air-gap.
b) Mmf required for teeth neglecting the slot flux.
c) Mmf required for teeth considering the slot flux.
Use B-‘at’ curve for ordinary steel plates as shown in figure. For the case of
saturation refer fig b and a for finding for Carter’s co-efficient .
 4.9
a)For Carter’s co-efficient

Mmf per metre ‘at’(4.16)

Gap contraction factor for slots :
Ratio slot width/ gap length = 1.2 / 0.8 = 1.5
Carter’s co-efficient from figure a corresponds to 1.5 for open slots Kav = 0.21 ,
Kgs = gap contraction fcator for slots

= ys/ ys – Kcs Ws = 25 / 25 – 0.21 x 12 = 1.112

Gap contraction for ducts :
Duct width = 01mm and number of ducts = 5
Ratio duct width/ gap length = 10/8 = 1.25
From fig a corressponding to 1.25 for open slots Kcd is 0.18
Gap contraction factor for ducts
-3
Kgd = L / L – Kcd nd Wd = 0.36 / 0.36 – 0.18 x 5 x 10 x 10 = 1.026
Total gap contarction factor Kg = Kgs x Kgd = 1.112 x 1.026 = 1.141
Mmf required for gap :
Assuming rectangular distribution of flux over pole arc
Form factor

Kf = φ

Gap density at the centre of pole Bg = flux per pole / pole arc x length of core
-12
= 72 x 10 / 0.3 x 0.36 = 0.667 Wb /m2
MMF required for air gap = 800,000 Kq Bq Iq
-3
= 800,000 x 1.41 x 0.667 x 8 x 10 = 4870.
b) MMF required for teeth neglecting saturation.
Net iron length = K Ø (L – ndWd) = 0.9 (0.36-5x10x 10-8 ) = 0.279 m
-8
No of teeth in pole arc = pole arc / tooth pitch at the gap surface = 0.3/25 x 10
= 12
Tooth width at the top of slot = 25 – 12 = 13mm
Tooth width at the bottom of slot = 22 -12 = 10mm
Flux density in the tooth is maximum at the bottom as the section there is
minimum calling this as Bt (mcs).
Bt (mcs) = flux per pole / number of teeeth in a pole arc x t x width of tooth at
the bottom.
-3 -3
= 72 x 10 / 12 x 0.279 x 10 x 10 = 2.15 Wb/m2

The value of flux density at any height x from narrow end

Bt(x) = Bt(max) / 1 + ax
A = width at the top – width at the bottom / height of teeth = 13 -10 / 60 = 0.05

The flux density in the teeth is calculated at various sections corresponding to

the value of ‘at’ taken from B -at curve . The results are tabulated as under:
 Distance from narrow end.
Now a graph is drawn between distance from narrow end and ‘at’. From the
graph the average value of mmf per metre atmean = 18700 A/m

The total emf required for teeth = 18700 x 6 /100 = 1122 A

Simpson’s rule :
Take three equidistant sections at the top, middle and bottom of the teeth
a t 1 = 55000 at2 = 13,500 at3 = 4750
at mean = 55000 +13500 + 4750 / 6 = 18,960 A/m
Total mmf required for teeth = 18960 x 6 / 100 = 1137A
Bt1/3 method :
Flux density at 1/3 length from narrow end = 1.96 Wb/m2
At1/3 from graph = 20,000A/m
This value is higher than the value of at from graphical method. This method
does not give accurate results for teeth working at saturation.
Total mmf required for teeth = 20,000 x 6/100 = 1200.

c)

6.9 Calculation of Stator core :

Figure 11. Stator core

When open slots are used the winding coils can be formed and fully insulated
before installing & it is easier to replace the individual coils. Another advantage
is that we can avoid excessive slot leakage thereby reducing the leakage
reactance When semi enclosed slots are used the coils must be taped &
insulated after they are placed in the slots. The advantages of semi-enclosed
slots are less airgap contraction factor giving a small value of magnetising
current, low tooth pulsation loss & much quieter operation. In small motors round
conductors are used and in large & medium size motors strip conductors are
used.

Stator core made up of laminations of thickness 0.5mm

The design of stator core involves

o selection of number of slots,

o estimation of dimensions of teeth
o Depth of stator core

Number stator slots depends on

1. Tooth pulsation loss 2. Leakagereactance3. Ventilation 4. Magnetizing current

5. Ironloss6. Cost stator slot pitch, yss= Gap surface/Total no. of stator slots Ss
-total stator slots

Guide- lines for selecting stator slots

Step (1)-

The stator slot pitch various from 15mm to 25mm.calculate the range ofstator
slots using the equation.

Stator slots Ss = πD /Yss

Minimum no of slots are obtained when Yss = 25mmMaximum no of slots are

obtained when Yss= 15mm

Step (2)

Stator slots should be multiple of q where q is slot /pole / phaseSs = number of

phases *poles * q

Step (3)
Select the choice of stator slots which are common between the valuesobtained
in step(1) and step(2)

Step (4)

The best choice of stator slots is given by the value of slots in the list obtained
from step(3) and satisfying the slot loading.

Slot loading = Iz Zss

Iz = current through a current

Zss = conductors per slots.

Area of stator slot

Area of each slot = Copper area per slot/space factor = Zss*as/ space factor

Space factor vary from 0.25 to 0.4After obtaining the area of the slot, the
dimensions of the slot should be adjusted. The slot should not be too wide to
give a thin tooth.

Stator teeth

Bts = 1.7 wb/m2 should not exceed this value

The mean flux density in stator tooth

Minimum teeth area per pole = φm/1.7

Teeth area per pole= (Ss/p)*Li*Wts

Minimum width of teeth, Wts= φm/(1.7*Ss/p*Li)

The minimum width of stator tooth is either near the gap surface or at one third
height of tooth from slot opening.

Depth of stator core

Cross Section of Stator Core

Flux density lies between 1.2 to 1.5 wb/m2Flux passing through the sector core
is half of the flux per pole

Flux = Фm / 2

Depth of stator core dcs = φm/(2*Bcs*Li)

Bcs = Flux desity in stator core Outer diameter of stator core

Do =D+2 (depth of stator slots +depth of core)

6.10 Calculation of rotor teeth

Minimum teeth area per pole = Øm / 1.7

Teeth area per pole = (Sr/p) x Li x Wtr

Minimum width of teeth Wtr= Øm / (1.7 x Sr / p x Li)

Minimum width of teeth Wtr = [ π[Dr- 2dsr)/Sr] – Wsr

6.11 Rotor core

Depth of rotor core =

Where
Bcr = flux density in rotor core
Inner diameter of rotor lamination Di = Dr -2(dsr+dcr)
Where dcr = depth of rotor core.
6.12 Effect of saturation:

6.13 Effect of ducts on calculations of magnetizing current.

6.14 Calculation of no-load current
The no load current of an induction motor has two components magnetizing
component, Im and iron loss component, Iw. Phase relation between these
currents is shown in Figure.

 Thus the no load current  I0 = √(Im)2 + (Iw)2 amps

Phasor diagram of induction motor 

Magnetising current: Magnetising current of an induction motor produces the

required amount of flux in the different parts of the machine. Hence this current
can be calculated from all the magnetic circuit of the machine. The ampere turns
for all the magnetic circuit such as stator core, stator teeth, air gap, rotor core
and rotor teeth give the total ampere turns required for the magnetic circuit.
Based on the total ampere turns of the magnetic circuit the magnetizing current
can be calculated as

 Magnetising current Im= p AT30 / (1.17 kw Tph )

 where p – no of pairs of poles, AT 30 – Total ampere turns of the magnetic circuit
at 300 from the centre of the pole, Tph – Number of stators turns per phase.

 Iron loss component of current: This component of current is responsible for

supplying the iron losses in the magnetic circuit. Hence this component can be
calculated from no load losses and applied voltage.
 Iron loss component of current  Iw= Total no load losses / ( 3 x phase voltage)

No load Power Factor: No load power factor of an induction motor is too poor.
As the load on the machine increases the power factor improves. No load power
factor can be calculated knowing the components of no- load current.

 No load power factor cosΦ0 = Iw / I0

 Ex. While designing the stator of a 3 phase 10 kW, 400 volts, 50 Hz, 4 pole,
wound rotor induction motor, following data are obtained.

Internal diameter of stator       = 0.19 m

Gross length         = 0.125 m

Number of stator slots   = 36

Number of conductors/slot      = 38

Dimension of stator slot          = 1.1 cm x 3.5 cm

Depth of the stator core = 3 cm

Number of rotor slots    = 30

Dimension of the rotor slot     = 0.7 cm x 3.0 cm

Depth of rotor core        = 3.0 cm

Carter’s coefficient for the air gap    = 1.33

Based on the above data, calculate the following performance data for this
motor.

(i) Flux per pole (ii) Iron losses  (iii) Active component of no load current (iv) No
load current (v) No load power factor

Soln.          (i) Flux per pole

Total number of stator conductors = 36 x 38 = 1368

Stator turns per phase Tph = 1368 /6 = 228

Assuming star delta connection for the motor Vph = 400 volts

Assuming  Eph = Vph = 400 volts, winding factor = 0.955

Air gap flux per pole  Φ = Eph/(4.44fTph kw)

= 400/( 4.44 x 50 x 228 x 0.955)

= 0.00827 wb
(ii) Iron losses

 Total Iron losses = Iron losses in stator teeth + Iron losses in stator core Iron
losses in stator teeth:

 For the given stator length assuming one ventilating duct of width 1cm and iron
space factor of 0.95,

Li  = (L – nd  x wd)ki

=  (0.125 -1 x 0.01)0.95

= 0.109 m

 Diameter at 1/3rd height, D' = D + 1/3 x hts x 2 = 0.19 + 1/3 x 0.035 x 2 = 0.213

m

 Slot pitch at 1/3rd height = τ's = π x D' /Ss = π x 0.213 /36 = 0.0186 m

 Tooth width at this section = b't = τ's – bs = 0.0186 – 0.011 = 0.0076 m

 Area of the stator tooth per pole  A't = b't x li x number of teeth per pole

 = b't x li x Ss /p = 0.0076 x 0.109 x 36/4

 = 0.00746 m2

 Mean flux density in stator teeth  B't = Φ / A't = 0.00827/ 0.00746 = 1.10 9 Tesla

 Maximum flux density in stator tooth =1.5 x 1.109  = 1.66 Tesla

 Volume of all the stator teeth = b't x li x height of teeth x number of teeth

 = 0.0076 x 0.109 x 0.035 x 36

 = 0.001044 m3

 Weight of all the teeth = volume x density Assuming a density of 7.8 x 10 3 kg/
m3

 Weight of all the teeth = 0.001044 x 7.8 x 10 3 = 8.14 kg Total iron losses in the
stator teeth = Total weight x loss/kg

 Iron loss in the material at a flux density of 1.66 Tesla from graph PP-22 of DDH
loss/kg = 23 w/kg

 Total iron losses in the stator teeth = 23 x 8.14 = 187.22 watts

 Iron losses in stator core : Sectional area of the stator core = li x dc = 0.109 x
0.03 = 0.00327 m2
 Mean diameter of the stator core below the slots = 0.19 + 2 x 0.035 + 0.03 =
0.29 m

Volume of the stator core = π x D x Acs = π x 0.29 x 0.00327 = 0.002979 m3 

Weight of the stator core = 0.002979 x 7.8 x 103 = 23.23 kg

Flux density in stator core = Φc / Acs = 0.00827/(2 x 0.00327) = 1.264 Tesla

At this flux density iron loss/kg = 17 watts/kg

Iron losses in the stator core = 17 x 23.23 = 394.91watts

Total iron losses in the stator = 187.22 + 394.91= 582.13 watts (iii) Active
component of no- load current

Assuming the friction and windage losses as 1% of output Friction and windage
loss = 100 w Total no load losses = 582.13 + 100 = 682.13 watts

 Active component of no load current = Iron loss component of current

 Iw= Total no load losses / ( 3 x phase voltage) = 682.13/( 3 x 400) = 0.568 amps

 (iv) Magnetising current: In order to calculate the magnetizing current ampere

turns required for the various parts of the magnetic circuits are to be calculated.

 (a)        Ampere turns for the stator core:

 Pole pitch at he mean diameter of the stator core = π x D/ P = π x 0.29/ 4 = 0.23
m Length of the flux path in stator core = 1/3 x 0.23 = 0.077 m

 Ampere turns per meter at a flux density of 1.264 Tesla from graph (PP-22 of
DDH) 400 AT

Hence total ampere turns required for the stator core = 400 x 0.077 = 31

(b)       Ampere turns for the stator teeth:

Length of the flux path in stator teeth = 0.035m

 Flux density in stator teeth at 300 from the pole centre = 1.36 Bt’

 = 1.36 x 1.10 9 =1.508 Tesla Ampere turns per meter at a flux density of 1.508
Tesla (from graph PP-22 of DDH) is 1000 AT

 Hence total ampere turns for the stator teeth = 1000 x 0.035 = 35

(c) Ampere turns for the air gap:

Length of the air gap = 0.2 + 2√DL = 0.2 + 2√0.19 x 0.125 = 0.51 mm Average
flux density in the air gap = Φ/ (π x DL/ P) = 0.4696 Tesla

Carter’s coefficient for the air gap       = 1.33

Air gap flux density at 300 from the centre of the pole Bg = 1.36 x Bav

= 1.36 x 0.4696 = 0.6387 Tesla

Hence Ampere turns for the air gap  = 796000Bgkglg

ATg = 796000 x 0.687 x 1.33 x 0.51 x 10-3 = 371 AT

(d) Ampere turns for the rotor Teeth :

Diameter of the rotor =  D -2lg =0.19 – 2 x 0.00051= 0.189 m

Diameter at 1/3rd height form the narrow end of the teeth  Dr’ = D – 2 x 2/3hrs

 = 0.189 – 4/3 x 0.03 = 0.149 m

 Slot pitch at 1/3rd height = τ'r = π x Dr' /Sr = π x 0.149 /30 = 0.0156 m

 Tooth width at this section = b'tr = τ'r – br = 0.0156 – 0.007 = 0.0086 m

 Area of the stator tooth per pole A'tr = b'tr x li x number of teeth per pole

 = 0.0086 x 0.107 x 30/4 = 0.0069 m2

 Flux density in rotor teeth at 30 0 from pole centre = 1.36 x 0.00827/0.0069 =

1.63 Tesla

 Ampere turns/m at this flux density, from graph (PP-22 of DDH) = 2800

 Length of flux path in rotor teeth = 0.03 m

 Ampere turns for the rotor teeth 2800 x 0.03 = 84

 (e) Ampere turns for the rotor core

 Depth of the rotor core dcr = 3 cm

 Area of the rotor core Acr = 0.03 x 0.107 = 0.00321 m2

 Flux in the rotor =  ½ x 0.00827 = 0.004135 wb

 Flux density in the rotor core = 0.004135/0.00321= 1.29 Tesla

 Ampere turns/m at this flux density, from graph (PP-22 of DDH) = 380

 Mean diameter of the rotor core = Dr – 2 x hrs – dcr = 0.189 – 2 x 0.03 – 0.03 =
0.099 m

 Pole pitch at this section = π x 0.099 /4 = 0.078 m

 Length of the flux path in rotor core = 1/3 x 0.078 = 0.026 m Total ampere turns
for the rotor core = 380 x 0.026 =10

 Total Ampere turns for the magnetic circuit = 31 + 35 + 371 + 84 +10 = 531
AT
Magnetising current Im = p(AT30) / (1.17 x Kw x Tph)

= 2 x 531 /( 1.17 x 0.955 x 228)

  = 4.2 amps

 (v) No load current

 No load current per phase  Io = √( Iw2 + Im2)

 =   √( 0.562 + 4.22)

 = 4.24 amps

 (vi)           No load power factor  cos  0 = Iw/I0  = 0.56 /4.24 = 0.132

6.15 Calculation of losses and efficiency
Efficiency is defined for an induction motor the same way as it is for any device:
η=Power Out / Power In = Pout / Pin ------(1)

Defining the losses in the machines as P loss , equation (1 ) can be written in other
forms:

Losses in the motor directly affect the cost of operation in it and indirectly the
motor rating. The efficiency is frequently determined by measuring the losses.
Types of Losses in the Induction Motor
Resistive or I2R losses are frequently referred to as copper losses found in stator
and rotor windings of the induction machine. Typically, in the induction motor,
the stator copper loss is about 33% and the rotor copper loss is about 15% of the
total loss of the machine.
Mechanical losses include friction and windage.