Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
com/hub/RFID-Advantages
Advantages of RFID In A Library
Increased efficiency in self-check-ins and checkouts. RFID technology is not like barcode
technology. In fact, RFID readers don’t need line of sight and can read multiple RFID tags
concurrently. Reading numerous tags at the same time means faster check-ins and check-outs thus
leading to an increase customer contentment.
Automatic check-ins. People can place items in an RFID return-bin and then get a receipt showing
that they have brought back books.
Improvement in sorting. An RFID wand can be used to easily and quickly distinguish books that are
out of sequence. These RFID wands can even be configured to show where the misplaced book
actually belongs right on the spot.
http://www.slais.ubc.ca/courses/libr500/04-05-wt2/www/T_Gnissios/index.htm
Introduction
A History of Development
RFID was developed out of the radar experiments and development during the Second
World War. The actual date of invention is 1948 but this was followed by decades
of development and experimentation before commercial applications were implemented.
For a detailed history of RFID development see the AIM publication
Shrouds of Time, The history of RFID. [3]
It wasn’t until the 1970’s that RFID implementations started to occur.
At this time the cost of the tags was prohibitive and use was limited.
By the 1980’s significant development had occurred and in 1987 Norway implemented
the first successful toll collection system. Toll systems were the breakthrough product for RFID.
In just a few years, toll systems and government toll collection agencies had spread
across the United States fueling the development of the system.
We now bring us forward to libraries again. During the 1990’s the proliferation of
competing systems and radio frequencies employed created the need for standards
and interoperability. Most warehousing operations can use large readers which
use low radio frequencies. Libraries need the higher frequency waves to allow for
smaller, less powerful and portable readers. As complexities and uses increased,
standards were developed to allow systems to work together.
Development of standards is still going on with the latest standard being release late in 2004.
The final piece of the RFID puzzle was the miniaturization of the
tags and the improvements in manufacturing.
These two developments dropped the price of the tags to a
level that allowed for wide-spread use of the system.
The first Library suppliers started to market their systems in the mid 1990’s.
RFID in Libraries
Benefits of RFID
The main benefit of RFID is the increase in productivity.
Materials handling is the primary efficiency. Checkout becomes a much faster
process as stacks of books can be checked out with one scan of a reader without
opening or handling the books. This is a dramatic reduction in the steps required
during checkout.
Fully implemented, the system could do away with a checkout station completely.
The patron walks past the exit sensors, the information is read off the smart card right
from the patron's pocket and the items are checked out. No contact with staff,
no need to interact with a station of any kind.
The system also has the potential to use a smart card to increase services
to patrons. Information can be embedded in the card including prepaid
dollars or other information useful at the checkout or other library service desks.
If the installation includes the security addition into the tag then
the checkout stations become far more user friendly.
All items can be checked out using the self checkout units as
no electromagnetic desensitizing occurs that can damage sensitive
audiovisual material. Also, the careful placement required by barcode
technology is no longer necessary as tag placement is not relevant to the RFID reader.
Inventory, tracking of lost items, shelf reading and all work associated
with checking the shelves becomes much easier using the portable readers.
Scan a shelf and the reader will read back the missing or out- of-place items
either through a report for limited readers or directly off the reader for more advanced versions.
Check in becomes far more efficient as entire bins of books can be
checked in by moving the bin through a large reader or scanning a
truck of books with a portable reader. This process reduces handling
of returned material by several steps.
Repetitive strain injuries that have plagued libraries will be reduced
as many of the repetitive movements at check in and checkout are reduced.
If the implementation of RFID is integrated with an automatic materials
sorting system, even further reductions in injuries will occur.
http://www.ehow.com/list_6116737_advantages-
disadvantages-rfid.html
RFID, or radio-frequency identification, is a system that identifies and wirelessly transmits the
identity of a person or an object via radio waves. An RFID system comprises of an antenna, a reader
and unique active, passive or battery-assisted passive tags. The main purpose of an RFID system is
the transmission of data through a tag (which is a portable transmitter). The RFID reader deciphers
and processes the data at the receiving end. This technology is popularly used in the health care,
manufacturing, retail, animal-tracking, defense and security, and transportation sectors.
Advantage 1: Efficiency
2. RFID tags do not require line-of-sight to be deciphered They can be read through cardboard, plastic,
wood and even the human body. RFID tags can easily track moving objects and send the required
information back to the reader. This eliminates human errors, reduces labor and provides quick
access to a wealth of information.
Advantage 2: Return on Investment (ROI)
3. RFID costs more to implement than a barcode system, but provides a good return on investment in
the long run, since RFID is significantly more efficient.
Advantage 3: Less Vulnerable to Damage
4. RFID tags are less susceptible to damage. An RFID tag is securely placed within an object or
embedded in plastic, enabling the system to be used in a variety of harsh environments, such as
areas of high temperature or moisture, or with exposure to chemicals or the outdoors.
Disadvantage 1: Expense
5. RFID systems are typically more expensive than alternatives such as barcode systems. While
passive tag reading is similar to (and generally less expensive than) barcode reading, active tags are
costly due to their complexity. Active tags consist of an antenna, radio transceiver and microchip,
increasing the overall cost of an RFID system.
Disadvantage 2: Collision
6. Tag collision and reader collision are common problems with RFID. Tag collision occurs when
numerous tags are present in a confined area. The RFID tag reader energizes multiple tags
simultaneously, all of which reflect their signals back to the reader. This results in tag collision, and
the RFID reader fails to differentiate between incoming data. RFID reader collision results when the
coverage area managed by one RFID reader overlaps with the coverage area of another reader.
This causes signal interference and multiple reads of the same tag.
Disadvantage 3: Security
7. RFID technology gives rise to numerous security concerns. Since the system is not limited to line-of-
sight, external (and malicious) high-intensity directional antennas could be used to scan sensitive
tags. Fraud is always a possibility when the technology is used for high-security operations, such as
payment verification.
RFID System for Librarywww.rfid-library.com
LibBest Library RFID Management, Security System
Many applications are now using radio frequency chip technology to automatically identify objects or
people. But while a variety of applications use radio waves to communicate information, the RF chip
technology used for each is quite different, addressing unique storage, range and security
requirements, according to according to Tony Revis of Extech Data Systems.
As a general definition, RFID tag technology is used in applications that identify or track objects and
contactless smart card technology, for example, is used in applications that identify people or store
financial or personal information.112.198.64.129 This article is copyright 2008 UsingRFID.com.
Advantages.
RFID technology does not require line-of-sight reading. Unlike a bar code, an RFID tag can
be read through other materials (though some materials may cause problems).
Theoretically, this means that you could take a pallet of mixed products, all of which contain
individual RFID tags, and have an RFID reader read all the tags within the palletized load
without having to physically move any of the materials or open any cases.
RFID tags can hold more data than bar codes. The operative word here is “can”. As the data
storage capacity of RFID tags increase, so does the cost of the tags. Therefore, you will
likely find that many RFID tags will not hold any more data than a bar code.
RFID tag data can be changed or added to as a tag passes through specific operations. Once
again, cost comes into play here, as read-only tags are much less expensive than read/write
tags. Therefore, you will likely see limited use of this functionality.
RFID tags are more effective in harsh environments where bar code labels have problems.
RFID tags can be sealed within a plastic enclosure eliminating many of the problems that
plague bar codes in harsh environments where they are exposed to chemicals, heat,
abrasion, dirt and grease buildup, etc.
A large number of RFID tags can be read almost instantaneously. This brings us back to the
palletized load scenario where the load contains a large quantity of products, each with its
own RFID tag. Though it may seem as though the tags are all read at once, they are
actually read sequentially (one at a time), however, this happens so fast that it is virtually
imperceptible.
Disadvantages.
Cost, Cost, Cost. This is the biggest hurdle to RFID tags replacing bar codes for item-level
tracking of low-cost products. You can produce a bar code on an item for less than 1 cent,
yet the most optimistic proponents of RFID are still “hoping” for 5 or 10-cent RFID tags
sometime in the future (this may be years away). And even if we get 5-cent tags, that is
still a significant cost to add to the manufactured cost of low-cost consumer goods. And
even with higher-cost products, or case and pallet level tracking, the benefits of RFID must
be greater than this additional cost.
RFID signals may have problems with some materials. Metals and liquids can cause
problems when trying to read RFID tags. Tag placement is becoming a science in and of
itself since — depending on the product — even a case-level RFID tag may have to be
placed in a specific location on the case and cases stacked in a specific orientation to get a
consistent read. When you get back to the mixed-pallet scenario, it is unclear whether or
not you can be assured that you have read all the tags on the pallet.
Though RFID does not require of line-of-sight, it is also not restricted by it. With the proper
bar code equipment, I can selectively read a single bar coded case on a shelf more than ten
feet away. I can’t do that with RFID since an RFID reader will read all tags within its range.
Even though you can get directional RFID readers, they are still not as selective as a visual
device (bar code scanner). There are still many warehouse applications that require this
line-of-site capability.
RFID tags can fail. Yes I know, bar code labels can fail as well. The unique issue with RFID
failure is the automated nature of RFID optimized processes. If you have a pallet of
materials with RFID tags and one of the RFID tags is damaged, how will you know that you
did not read all the tags. And, what happened to your system data when this occurred.
RFID programming speed. The smartlabel scenario (using labels with integrated RFID chips)
seems to be the most likely one for mass utilization of RFID for case and unit tracking of
inventory. Unfortunately, it takes more time to print, program, and verify an RFID enabled
label than to simply print a bar code label. In addition, RFID smartlabels seem to have some
serious quality problems. I have been hearing of average failure rates (inability to properly
program and read the tag) of anywhere from 10% to 30%. For automated print-and-apply
applications, this could be a serious problem.
RFID standards are still being developed. You don’t want to invest in an RFID system that is
based on soon-to-be obsolete specs. Most RFID systems currently in place are based upon
proprietary technology where the readers are designed to only read RFID tags from a
specific manufacturer. When compared to bar code technology, where standards have been
in place for decades, most bar code scanners are designed to read all standard bar code
symbologies.
There are actually two reasons why active is better than passive in your case for the pure
identification: better receiving and better transmitting of the active tag.
Better receiving:
The passive tag requires energy from the electromagnetic field of the reader for the entire
operation. If the passive tag does not get enough energy from the field it will not start
operating at all. Therewith the tag might not even receive the request for it's ID from the
reader.
In contrast to that, the active tag always operates and therewith needs much less
electromagnetic field strenght to acquire the request for the ID from the reader.
-> The active tag receives better.
Better transmitting:
It might be the case that the passive tag got enough energy to operate and processed the
request from the reader. The passive tag might even have sent the response with it's ID.
But, the transmission power was not enough to reach the reader. The response got lost.
Again, the active tag is in a better position. It transmits the response with a higher power
such that the reader has a much better chance to acquire the response signals.
-> The active tags transmits better.
One important drawback to mention is the power supply situation of the active tag. It
always needs a battery or similar energy source for operation. Though, active tags might be
optimized for reasonable life time, depending on the application scenario.
And there might be additional values of active tags like temperatur logging in cool chains.
Small, check-card-sized tags can log temperatures during transport of perishable or
pharmaceutic goods. The independent activity then is essential for the logging.
The distance from which a tag can be read is the read range. There are environmental and
application factors that may limit read range. Optimal conditions exist in an air environment
with the tag placed perpendicular to the antenna field. Factors such as tag frequency,
electromagnetic noise, metals and antenna power may affect the read range. Typically, the
larger the tag the better the read range. Some tag and antenna combinations can read
passive tags as far away as 18 inches. Most read ranges using hand-held readers are 3 to 9
inches depending on the reader.
Re: RFID Advantage and disadvantage Shrinivasan
Outline
What is RFID.
RFID Applications.
RFID Devices (Interrogator & Transponder).
Different Frequency Bands and Standards.
System Design for Passive and Semi-Passive Systems.
Passive Tag Building Blocks.
Future research Topics.
basic difference is
Passive Tags Active Tags
Derive power from the electromagnetic field generated by the reader Internal power to
transmit signal
Fewer tags can be read simultaneously More tags can be read simultaneously
Greater orientation sensitivity Less orientation sensitivity
Re: RFID Advantage and disadvantage Verayue
Dear Sir/Madam,
With us, you'll have a wide range of RFID products to choose from. We offer RFID
Card,Contact IC Card and Laundry tag etc.
All the products are undering an ISO 9001:2000-certified management system. Small MOQ
(1000pcs) which will be shipped in one seven working days.
Thanks&Regards,
Vera
Email:oprfid.sales@oprfid.com
oprfid.salesyue@hotmail.com
http://www.idautomation.com/rfid_faq.html
In the examples below, the first row defines the fields and the bit
size allocated for each. For example, Serial Number (36) means 36
bits are allocated to store the serial number field. The second row is
an example of how this field would be formatted for IDAutomation
RFID software products. The total number of bits of all sections
must equal the tag size and all unallocated bits must be padded
with zeros. For example, 8+4+48+36=96 bits. The maximum
decimal value for a field is calculated with the formula of 2^n-
1 where n=the fixed number of bits in the field. When
using IDAutomation RFID software products, the tag size property
must equal the bit size of the tag.
DOD-96: (step-by-step example)
CAGE Code as
Header Filter Serial Number
ASCII
(8) (4) (36)
(48)
GID-96:
Manager Object
Header Serial Number
Number Class
(8) (36)
(28) (24)
EPC GIAI-96:
Partitio Company Individual Asset
Header Filter
n* Prefix Reference
(8) (3)
(3) (20-40) (62-42)
EPC SGTIN-96:
Item
Partitio Company
Header Filter Referenc Serial Number
n* Prefix
(8) (3) e (38)
(3) (20-40)
(24-4)
EPC SSCC-96: (To create the SSCC barcode, refer to the SSCC-18
Barcode Label FAQ)
Partitio Company Serial Unallocate
Header Filter
n* Prefix Reference d**
(8) (3)
(3) (20-40) (38-18) (24)
NOTES:
1. The header determines the EPC tag standard. The following
are a few of the defined header standards:
11001110 DOD-64
11001111 DOD-96
00110000 SGTIN-96
00110001 SSCC-96
00110010 GLN-96
00110011 GRAI-96
00110100 GIAI-96
00110101 GID-96
0 40 12 42 12
1 37 11 45 13
2 34 10 48 14
3 30 9 52 15
4 27 8 55 16
5 24 7 58 17
6 20 6 62 18
~b00800110000~n0033~n0035~n0240614141~n020100734 ~n0382
^XA^RFW,H ~b00800110000~n0033~n0035~n0240614141
^FS
^FD ~n020100734~n0382
Encoding Options:
The IDAutomation RFID Label Software may be used to
increment a serial number in VB script as in this example
encoding a label for the DOD-96 UID:
"~b00811001111~b0040000~t048 2S194" & "~n036" & 1000
+ L#
In many cases, the data encoded may extend beyond the
label. In this case, a simple formula of "LBL" & L# may be
used as the formula value to encode only LBL and the label
number in the barcode.
8. If the custom command properly creates a barcode on the
label, the software, printer, and printer driver are working
correctly. If the problem still exists, it resides in either the
printer's RFID firmware or the printer's RFID encoder.
9. If the custom command does not create the label properly,
try the following or contact the printer manufacturer to resolve
the issue:
1. Check the printer manual and the control codes being
sent to the printer, and verify this against the
EncoderPrefix and EncoderSuffix. The In most cases, you
need to use specific commands for different types of
tags. Examples...
2. Check the Print Command. Normally, the Print Command
may be left blank. However, when using Datamax
printers, Q0001 or another printer command must be
used that identifies the command to print at the end of
each label. When left blank, the encoder inserts its data
(EncoderPrefix + DataToEncode + EncoderSuffix) just
before the last line that appears at the end of each label.
3. In the IDAutomation RFID Label Software, the data being
encoded may be examined in the diagnostics tab. Verify
the encoder prefix and suffix values are appended to the
data being encoded in the tag.*
* Note that lower ASCII functions such as <STX> and
<CR> will not display as a character.
4. Make sure the entire tag is encoded with data. Unused
bits of the tag should be encoded with zeros or a pad
character recommended by the implementation. This
problem is corrected by setting the Tag Bit Size in the
software to the actual bit size of the tag.
5. Check the alignment of the printer's RFID writer and the
place where the chip is located in your label. If you
receive many voided labels, this is most likely the issue.
6. Be sure not to damage the label by bending it. Lay the
label upside down and remove the liner without bending
the label, then apply it to a flat surface.
10.It is suggested to read the data encoded in the label by
placing the label on a reader or placing the tag on the printer's
reader.
1. In the Datamax RFID Printer, the label is read by
diagnostics. Choose Menu - Diagnostics - Options Testing
- Test RFID - Tag Data.
2. When using the Zebra R110xi printer, press Setup and
the Previous button until "RFID Tag Data" appears in the
display.
3. If the data in the tag is read correctly, the tag was
encoded properly.
Determining the Print Command and Examining Printer
Files:
It may be necessary to verify the actual data being sent to the
printer to find a good Print Command.
1. Change the PrintCommand to VERBOSE. If a command
currently exists in the PrintCommand, Append the command to
VERBOSE. For example, a command of Q0001 would become
VERBOSEQ0001. When the text of VERBOSE appears in the
PrintCommand, diagnostic files are created in the %TEMP%
directory for each label printed. When the PrintCommand is left
blank, the encoder inserts its data (EncoderPrefix +
DataToEncode + EncoderSuffix) just before the last line that
appears at the end of each label.
Printronix
^WT0,,,,1FDN^FD ^FS
SL5204 MP
000 00 <NUL>
002 02 <STX>
003 03 <ETX>
013 0d <CR>
http://www.nndaycollege.com/rfid-intro.html
Radio Frequency Identification Device is a means of capturing data about an object without using a
human to read data, i.e., it is a method of remotely storing and retrieving data using devices. It is a
technology similar in theory to barcode identification but one key difference between RFID and
barcode technology is RFID eliminates the need for line-of-sight reading that barcode depends on.
Also RFID scanning can be done at greater distance than barcode scanning.
An RFID system may consist of several devices like tags, tag readers, tag programming sections,
circulation readers, and sorting equipment and tag Inventory wands. Security can be handled in two
ways. Security gates can query the ILS to determine its security status or the tag may contain a
security bit which would be turned on and off by circulation or self-check reader stations.
Although some people think that the first “known” device may have invented by Leon Theremin as an
espionage tool for the Russian Government in 1945, the first real usage of RFID devices predates
that . During Second World War the United Kingdom used RFID devices to distinguish returning British
aeroplanes from in-bound German ones. RADAR was only able to signal the presence of an aeroplane,
not the kind of aeroplane it was.
A curious aspect of technical innovation is the time it takes to go from being invented to being mass-
adopted by the market. The mobile phone, invented in 1972, did not become a must-have item until
the 2000's in our country. Like wise, with the Internet it took 30 years for DARPA's net to
metamorphose into Time Berner Lee's world wide web.
RFID is one such innovation. Invented in the 1970's, companies immediately recognized the value in a
device that could help machines identify other objects.
However, there were problems, the main two being those of standardization and making the ROI
business case a viable one. “ Why bother when we already have bar codes. And most importantly, the
cost of producing RFID tags has dropped dramatically.
This has led to numerous trials and rollouts of RFID around the world over the last few years. RFID
usage has become increasing by prevalent in the retail and logistics sector to enable supply chain
management as well as the transport sector for applications, such as security and road toll pricing.
However we must discussed the advantages and disadvantages of using RFID Technology before going
to any conclusion.
RFID technology advantages and disadvantages :
Compared to barcode inventory control systems RFID technology has both advantages and
disadvantages, many of which are outside of product manufacture and distribution chain applications.
ADVANTAGES versus Barcodes
• Not requiring line of sight access to be read.
• The tag can trigger security alarm systems if removed from its correct location.
• Scanner/reader and RFID tag are not (so) orientation sensitive.
• Automatic scanning and data logging is possible without Operator intervention.
• Each tag can hold more than just a unique product code.
• Each item can be individually ‘labeled'.
• Tag data can be comprehensive, unique in parts/common in parts, and is compatible with data
processing.
• With the right technology a plurality of tags can be concurrently read
• It can be read only or read-write.
• There is a very high level of data integrity (character check sum encoding).
• Provides a high degree of security and product authentication – a tag is more difficult to counterfeit
than a barcode.
• The supporting data infrastructure can allow data retrieval and product tracking anywhere provided
the scanner/reader is close enough to the tag.
• Combined with its authentication is the ability to monitor shelf life – a societal advantage in the
pharmaceutical and food industry.
• Since each tag can be unique they can act as a security feature if lost or stolen e.g. a stolen smart
travel card can be cancelled.
• The technology is rugged and can be used in hostile environments such as down oil wells (heat and
pressure) to carry data to remote equipment.
• The technology lends itself to being updated, for example, as a car goes through its life its service
record can be electronically logged with the car.
• The technology could be inserted within a suit so that when it is sent to the cleaners it automatically
gets the right cleaning procedure applied to it.
• The technology can be used to increase security so that, for example, it may be construed that a
child is at school as their tag in their school bag was logged when they came through the school gates.
[Clearly, this does not of necessity mean the child is at school, but only that their bag with the
contained RFID tag has been taken into the school, which in most circumstances will mean the child
was with it at the time.]
DISADVANTAGES versus Barcodes :
• Even in six figure production quantities, the simplest of these tags is more expensive (say tens of
Rupees) than a printed barcode – this extra cost, plus the potential greater infrastructure capital cost,
has to be bettered by other benefits in the distribution chain or represent an application for which the
barcode is not suitable e.g. Smart Cards.
• There is a high cost (long pay-back) for integrating RFID technology into existing inventory control
systems.
• External influences such as metalwork, material dielectric properties and radio interference can
constrain RFID remote reading.
• If a significant number of RFID's greater systems capabilities are implemented then the host system
and infrastructure have a higher capital cost and complexity than for barcode systems.
• There are currently a range of RFID application numbering systems which need unifying to increase
uptake. [The International Standards Organisation (ISO) and Electronic Product Code [EPC] Global
consortium, amongst others, are working to address this issue.]
• Currently there are not internationally agreed frequencies for RFID operation (other than 13.56 MHz,
which is primarily used by smart cards but can also be used by other RFID tags) and permitted
scanner/reader powers differ between countries. This limits product take-up. [For example, there are
significant differences between the USA and European UHF frequencies.]
To address these disadvantages there are programmes to develop standards, which will enable
interoperability. This will increase confidence in the technology, stimulate greater competition and
produce consequential reduction in costs.
The market Economy has already changed our society and as a whole, the Government policy. We are
running after I.T. but in comparison to some other state of our country, we have been late in joining
the competition. With some diligent efforts in the last few years, we have, of course succeeded to
catch the states in the race others. Our state is now one of the leading states in software and
hardware industry. However the RFID has opened up a new era specially in defence, police, health
services, marketing, transport sector etc. Our state should be aware of the same and try to imbibe
RFID technology so that we can adopt it and be able to capture the world market on this technology.
References:
• Radio Frequency Identification Technology (RFID) © IEE 2005 18
• http:/www.crimereduction.co.uk/securedesign14.htm
• e.center:http://www.e-centre.org.uk/sec_home.asp?fid=61
A passive tag is an RFID tag that does not contain a battery; the power is supplied by
the reader. When radio waves from the reader are encountered by a passive rfid tag,
the coiled antenna within the tag forms a magnetic field. The tag draws power from it,
energizing the circuits in the tag. The tag then sends the information encoded in the
tag's memory.
The major disadvantages of a passive rfid tag are:
• The tag can be read only at very short distances, typically a few feet at most.
This greatly limits the device for certain applications.
• It may not be possible to include sensors that can use electricity for power.
• The tag remains readable for a very long time, even after the product to which
the tag is attached has been sold and is no longer being tracked.
The advantages of a passive tag are:
• The tag functions without a battery; these tags have a useful life of twenty years
or more.
• The tag is typically much less expensive to manufacture
• The tag is much smaller (some tags are the size of a grain of rice). These tags
have almost unlimited applications in consumer goods and other areas.