Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
SR RATIONAL CITATION
NO
.
1. Court jurisdiction cannot be created by AR ANTULAY VS R.S. NAYAK
judicial order unless provided by the 1998(2)SCC602
statute.
2. Second revision not maintainable in the a) RAJAN KUMAR
garb of petition u/s 482 CrPC MANCHANDA VS
STATE OF KARNATKA
1990(SUPP)SCC132.
b) DHARAMPAL &ORS VS
RAMSHREE &ORS
1993(1)SCC435
c) DEEPTI VS AKHIL RAI
1995(5)SCC751
d) VIRENDER KAUR VS
STATE OF NCT OF
DELHI CRL MC NO.
3931/2017
DATED:21.09.2017
e) TATHAGAT EXPORT
PVT. LTD.& ORS VS
PEC LTD(DHC)CRL MC
NO.241/2020
3. No provision of discharge in summons a) SUBRAMANIUM
trial. SETHURAMAN VS
STATE OF
MAHARASHTRA
2004(13)SCC324
b) AMIT SIBAL VS
ARVIND KEJRIWAL
2018(12)SCC165
c) SHASHI ADLAKHA VS
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
FINANCE
CORPORATON
MANU/DE/0628/2019
d) TATHAGAT EXPORT
PVT. LTD.& ORS VS
PEC LTD(DHC)CRL MC
NO.241/2020
4. Court cannot look into the documents a) STATE OF ORISSA VS
filed by the accused at the stage of DEVENDER NATH
framing of notice. PADI 2005(1)SCC568
b) SMS
PHARMACEUTICAL
LTD VS NEETA
BHALLA
2005IIIAD(CR)SC593
c) DR. D.P DASS VS
STATE AND ORS
CRIMINAL REVISION
282/2006
5. Presumption under section 139 can be SHIV KUMAR VS
reverted only by leading evidence. RAMAVATAR AGGARWAL
(SC) CRL APP NO. 1688 OF
2017 DATED: 19.02.2020
6. The averments made in complaint only a) STANDERD
to be seen. CHARTERED BANK VS
STATE OF
MAHARASHTRA
2016(6)SCC62
b) GUNMALA SALES VS
ANU MEHTA
2015(1)SCC103
c) SOMENDER KHOSLA
VS STATE CRL
MC.3982 OF 2017
DATED 09.01.2019