Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Harcombe Z, Baker JS, Cooper SM, et al. Open Heart 2015;2:e000196. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000196 1
Open Heart
The evidence available to dietary committees at that met the inclusion criteria: Rose Corn Oil Trial;14
time comprised epidemiological studies and randomised Research Committee Low-fat Diet;15 MRC Soya-bean
controlled trials (RCTs). The most comprehensive popu- Oil;16 LA Veterans Study;17 Oslo Diet Heart Study18 19;
lation study undertaken was the Seven Countries Study and The Sydney Diet Heart Study.20 The Anti-Coronary
by Keys.3 This reported that CHD ‘tended to be related’ club trial21 and The Finnish Mental Hospital Study6 7
to serum cholesterol values and that, these in turn were excluded, as they were not randomised. The
‘tended to be related’ to the proportion of calories pro- Finnish study was also a cross-over trial. This is not
vided by saturated fats in the diet.4 Keys acknowledged appropriate for the examination of a long-term mortal-
that epidemiological studies could reveal relationships, ity, as deaths in the second phase may be due to condi-
not causation.3 RCTs provide the best evidence.5 tions imposed during the initial phase. Inclusion criteria
While the UK nutritional guidelines2 made reference to are in agreement with previous literature.9
the Seven Countries Study, the US committee document1 To ascertain the validity of eligible randomised trials, a
did not. Neither publication made reference to any of the pair of reviewers (ZH and FG) worked independently to
RCTs available at that time. However, the US Committee determine which studies met the inclusion criteria. The
report reported data from the non-randomised, cross-over same six were agreed on. Risk of bias was further
trial, the Finnish Mental Hospital Study.6 7 assessed using the PEDro scale for the relative quality of
Although a number of reviews of RCTs have been studies.22 Additionally, the meta-analyses for all-cause
undertaken,8–10 no review has examined the RCT evi- mortality (figure 2) and CHD deaths (figure 3) were
dence available at the time dietary fat guidelines were tested for sensitivity analysis of the exclusion of any one
introduced. Furthermore, these guidelines have not been study.
changed since they had been announced; correspond-
ingly, the validity of their evidence base remains relevant. Data extraction
This systematic review and meta-analysis will assess if Table 1 details data extraction including: study name,
the published RCTs available to the dietary committees duration, year of publication and confirmation of study
supported their recommendations on dietary fat. With design; participant characteristics; details of intervention
this in mind, we hypothesised that RCT evidence avail- and comparison diet; and outcomes relating to all-cause
able to the dietary committees at the time of issuing mortality, CHD-related deaths and changes in mean
recommendations did not support the contention that serum cholesterol levels. Where a study contained more
reducing dietary fat intake would contribute to a reduc- than one intervention, both were included.14
tion in CHD risk or related mortality.
Statistical analysis
METHODS The overall pooled effect was calculated using random
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was evaluated using
accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.11 the Q-value, I2 and T2 calculations. Funnel plot method-
ology24 and Egger’s regression intercept23 24 have been
calculated, noting the caution for analysing publication
Search strategy
bias using funnel plot asymmetry where the
A search was undertaken to identify RCTs that examined
meta-analysis has fewer than 10 studies.25 Analyses were
the relationship between dietary fat, serum cholesterol
performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis.26
and mortality. Exclusion criteria were: study being obser-
vational; non-randomised and/or multifactorial in
design. Inclusion criteria were: randomised dietary inter- RESULTS
vention studies; study hypothesis relating to a reduction Participants and study design
or modification of dietary fat or cholesterol; participants The identified RCTs included a total of 740 deaths and
were human adults; study was a minimum of 1 year in 423 deaths from CHD among 2467 male participants
duration; data on all-cause mortality, CHD mortality and (table 1). All but one trial exclusively studied secondary
cholesterol measurements were available. prevention participants. The LA Veterans Study17 com-
Searches were performed of the literature to 1983 prised one-fifth secondary participants and four-fifths
using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library. The AMED, primary participants.
CAB abstracts, CINAHL, EMBASE, HMIC and SIGLE All trials were parallel and randomised. Two were
(grey literature sources) were not relied on, as their blinded for outcome assessment.15 16 Two were open,
periods covered were not compatible: from 1985, 1973, with no blinding on either side.19 20 The LA Veterans
1981, 1980, 1983 and 1992, respectively.12 13 (figure 1). study17 was reported as double blinded, but the dietary
changes were so substantial that this seems implausible
Selection of studies (egg consumption quantified, vegetable oils added and
Of the 98 identified articles, 80 were rejected on review animal fats restricted). Rose et al14 was reported as
of the title and abstract. The remaining 18 papers blinded to intervention participants for the type of oil,
covered 8 trials, once duplication was resolved. Six RCTs but not blinded for outcome assessment.
2 Harcombe Z, Baker JS, Cooper SM, et al. Open Heart 2015;2:e000196. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000196
Meta-analysis
The mean duration of the six trials was 5.4±3.5 years. Visual inspection of the funnel plots revealed that none
The weighted mean ( person years by people) was 6.5 of the studies lay outside the SE funnel for the
±1 years. meta-analysis of all deaths or CHD deaths. The two, small,
Quality scores were moderate and relatively homogen- Rose et al14 studies produced asymmetry on the lower right
ous: all trials had quality scores of 4 or 5 using the hand side of the funnels. Egger’s regression test confirmed
PEDro scale.22 The meta-analyses for all-cause mortality some asymmetry, noting the caution for the small number
(figure 2) and CHD deaths (figure 3) were tested for of studies.25 The Egger’s regression intercept was 1.029
sensitivity analysis of the exclusion of any one study. (95% CI two-tailed, −0.433 to 2.492) (one-tailed p=0.065;
There were no circumstances in which the exclusion of two-tailed p=0.130) for the all deaths meta-analysis and
any one study made the overall effect size significant. 1.554 (95% CI two-tailed, −0.013 to 3.121) (one-tailed
Statistical evidence for substantial between study het- p=0.025; two-tailed p=0.051) for CHD deaths.
erogeneity was not found. For all deaths, the Q-value was
7.115 (6° of freedom). I2 was 15.676 and T2 was 0.006. Interventions and comparisons
For CHD deaths, the Q-value was 8.649 (6° of freedom). Five of the six RCTs did not examine either a total fat
I2 was 30.632 and T2 was 0.028. consumption of 30%, or a saturated fat consumption of
Harcombe Z, Baker JS, Cooper SM, et al. Open Heart 2015;2:e000196. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000196 3
Open Heart
10%, of energy intake. The trials examined: the adminis- The mean death rate was high reflecting the fact that
tration of vegetable oil;14 16 17 19 the replacement of these were secondary prevention studies, except for the
saturated fats with vegetable oil;16 17 19 and an approxi- combined primary and secondary prevention LA
mate 20% fat diet.15 A single RCT20 examined the con- Veterans study. Unsurprisingly death rates were higher
sequence of a 10% saturated fat diet and reported a in the longer term studies. The lowest death rate was
higher incidence of all-cause mortality and CHD deaths observed in the control group of Rose et al.14
in the intervention group. In the meta-analysis of all-cause mortality, the LA
Veterans study17 carried the greatest weight, 41.71%,
(figure 2 random effects methodology). The corn and
Outcomes: all-cause mortality olive oil interventions had negligible impact on the overall
Across six studies containing seven dietary interven- effect, with weights of 0.46% and 0.41%, respectively.14
tions14 involving 1227 people in the intervention groups The risk ratio (RR) for all seven studies was 0.996 (95% CI
and 1240 people in the control groups, there were 370 0.865 to 1.147). The overall effect measurement lies on
deaths in the intervention and control groups. The all- the line of no effect. There was no statistically significant
cause mortality was 30.2% in the intervention groups relationship between dietary interventions and all-cause
and 29.8% in the control groups. mortality.
4 Harcombe Z, Baker JS, Cooper SM, et al. Open Heart 2015;2:e000196. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000196
Meta-analysis
CHD mortality
The seven interventions recorded 207 deaths from CHD
in the intervention groups and 216 in the control
Mean −12.6/−6.5
in figure 3 (random effects methodology).
In the meta-analysis of CHD mortality, the Leren Oslo
−16.9/−12.4
−18.0/−14.1
S.D. 6.7/5.1
−16.9/−5.9
−11.0/−7.1
−7.6/−1.2 study19 carried the greatest weight, 34.16%, (figure 3
−0.4/−1.2 random effects methodology). The corn and olive oil
interventions carried the least weight with 1.22% and
1.09%, respectively.14 The RR for all seven studies was
0.989 (95% CI 0.784 to 1.247). The overall effect measure-
17/20 deaths
27/25 deaths
41/50 deaths
79/94 deaths
35/25 deaths
CHD deaths
207/216
Int/Ctrl
heart deaths.
Outcomes
370/370
20/24
28/31
39/28
soya-bean oil
3.4
DISCUSSION
Participants
1227/1240
TOTAL
Harcombe Z, Baker JS, Cooper SM, et al. Open Heart 2015;2:e000196. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000196 5
Open Heart
theory that reducing dietary fat generally and saturated fat Deductions can be made about the dietary interven-
particularly potentiates a reduction in CHD. tions and mortality from all-causes and CHD. The Rose
There are some important design limitations among et al14 interventions most notably favour the control in
the available RCTs. The LA Veterans study17 provided both forest plots, but the wide CIs render these, as with
meals in a contained environment, but was undermined all the studies, non-significant.
by open enrolment, allowing participants to leave and Only one study made a positive claim for its intervention
join. The other five RCTs relied on dietary advice, with after 5 years18 and subsequently, this was moderated.19
meetings and periodical dietary analysis to monitor Rose et al14 warned of possible harm by administering corn
adherence. Three of these studies audited outcomes oil. The Research Committee15 concluded “A low-fat diet
and the data extracted in table 1 recorded actual, not has no place in the treatment of myocardial infarction”
target, dietary intake.14 19 20 A number of studies (p504). The MRC Soya-bean oil16 intervention found no
impaired assessment of one intervention (administering evidence that MI relapse would be materially affected by
oils) by adding other dietary restrictions.16 17 19 unsaturated fat in the diet. The LA Veterans study17
The LA Veterans study17 recorded the lowest RR for reported that total longevity was not affected and
CHD deaths for the intervention group: 0.816 (figure expressed concern about unknown toxicity of their inter-
3). However, there were important differences in the vention. Woodhill et al20 noted that survival was signifi-
groups at study entry. The intervention group had 12 cantly better in the control than the diet group.
octogenarians, compared with 21 in the control group. In the absence of epidemiological evidence from
Eleven per cent of the experiment group were heavy whole-populations, large-scale RCTs of longer duration
smokers (more than one pack a day) compared with (with adequate follow-up), which accounted for known
17% of the control group. confounding variables and included primary partici-
Woodhill et al20 made an important observation that pants of both males and females, may have supported
men who have suffered an myocardial infarction (MI) the introduction of dietary fat guidelines in 1977 and
subsequently make multiple lifestyle changes (weight 1983. However, this opportunity expired when universal
loss, smoking cessation, increase in physical activity, for pharmacological treatment became the accepted norm.
example), which makes them a poor group for testing From the literature available, it is clear that at the time
the lipid hypothesis. In this respect, the reporting of dietary advice was introduced, 2467 men had been
cholesterol decreases in control and intervention groups observed in RCTs. No women had been studied; no
supports the observation that multiple lifestyle changes primary prevention study had been undertaken; no RCT
are made. had tested the dietary fat recommendations; no RCT
Studies of the time report weight, not body mass. concluded that dietary guidelines should be introduced.
Weight changes were not recorded in two studies.14 19 It seems incomprehensible that dietary advice was intro-
The two studies noted no significant weight change in duced for 220 million Americans28 and 56 million UK
intervention or control groups.16 17 The Research citizens,29 given the contrary results from a small
Committee study15 reported mean weight loss as 7.5% in number of unhealthy men.
the intervention group and 4.8% in the control group. An exchange between Dr Robert Olson of St Louis
Woodhill et al20 reported a mean weight loss of 6.5% University and Senator George McGovern, chair of the
and 6% in the intervention and control groups, Dietary Committee, was recorded in July 1977.30 Olson said
respectively. “I pleaded in my report and will plead again orally here for
The phytosterol content of vegetable oils could more research on the problem before we make announce-
explain reductions in cholesterol levels with no concomi- ments to the American public.” McGovern replied
tant reductions in deaths.27 “Senators don’t have the luxury that the research scientist
A limitation of the present review and meta-analysis does of waiting until every last shred of evidence is in”.
relates to the detailed information in the original studies There was best practice, randomised controlled trial,
in order to determine the saturated, monounsaturated evidence available to the dietary committees, which was
and polyunsaturated content of the control and inter- not considered and should have been. The results of the
vention diets. Woodhill et al20 was the only study to detail present meta-analysis support the hypothesis that the
the composition of the three fats in the intervention available RCTs did not support the introduction of
and control diet; a 10% saturated fat intake being the dietary fat recommendations in order to reduce CHD
intervention goal. Leren19 documented the intervention risk or related mortality.
diet as 40% of total calories as fat; 8.3% of total calories Two recent publications have questioned the alleged
as saturated fat and a polyunsaturated to saturated fat relationship between saturated fat and CHD and called
ratio of 2.4:1. No comparable measures were given for for dietary guidelines to be reconsidered.31 32
the control diet in this study. Other studies recorded The present review concludes that dietary advice not
total fat intake as a percentage of calories, but not indi- merely needs review; it should not have been introduced.
vidual fat composition. Consequently, deductions about
the relationship between different fats and serum choles- Contributors ZH conceived of the study and was the major contributor to
terol levels cannot be made. data extraction, writing of the manuscript and the meta-analysis. FG was
6 Harcombe Z, Baker JS, Cooper SM, et al. Open Heart 2015;2:e000196. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000196
Meta-analysis
involved in data extraction, writing of the manuscript and the meta-analysis. 12. National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). Journals and
BD was involved in writing of the manuscript. NS was involved in the databases. Secondary Journals and databases. 2014. http://www.
meta-analysis. All authors contributed to the manuscript. All authors were library.nhs.uk/help/resource
13. SIGLE System for Information on Grey Literature in Europe. Grey
involved in critical evaluation of content. Literature Network Service. Secondary Grey Literature Network
Competing interests None. Service Founded. 1992. http://www.opengrey.eu/about/greyliterature
14. Rose GA, Thomson WB, Williams RT. Corn oil in treatment of
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed. ischaemic heart disease. BMJ 1965;1:1531–3.
15. Research Committee. Low-fat diet in myocardial infarction:
Data sharing statement The PRISMA checklist can be shared with the a controlled trial. Lancet 1965;2:501–4.
publication. The full list of papers from the first search return can be obtained 16. Medical Research Council. Controlled trial of soya-bean oil in
from the corresponding author (excel file). The Comprehensive Meta Analysis myocardial infarction: Report of a research committee to the Medical
files can be shared with other users of the CMA package—available from the Research Council. Lancet 1968;292:693–700.
17. Dayton S, Pearce ML, Hashomoto S, et al. A Controlled clinical trial
corresponding author. of a diet high in unsaturated fat in preventing complications of
Open Access This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with atherosclerosis. Circulation 1969;40:(1S2):II-1–II-63. .
18. Leren P. The effect of plasma-cholesterol-lowering diet in male
the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license,
survivors of myocardial infarction. A controlled clinical trial. Bull N Y
which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non- Acad Med 1968;44:1012–20.
commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided 19. Leren P. The Oslo Diet-Heart Study. Circulation 1970;42:935–42.
the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http:// 20. Woodhill JM, Palmer AJ, Leelarthaepin B, et al. Low fat, low
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ cholesterol diet in secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
Adv Exp Med Biol 1978;109:317–30.
21. Christakis G, Rinzler SH, Archer M, et al. Effect of the anti-coronary
club program on coronary heart disease risk-factor status. JAMA
1966;198:597–604.
REFERENCES 22. de Morton NA. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the
1. Select Committee on Nutrition and Human Needs. Dietary goals for methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J
the United States. 1st edn. Washington: US Govt Print Off, 1977. Physiother 2009;55:129–33.
2. National Advisory Committee on Nutritional Education (NACNE). 23. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis
A discussion paper on proposals for nutritional guidelines for health detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629–34.
education in Britain, 1983. 24. Sterne JAC, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JPA, et al. Recommendations for
3. Keys A. Coronary heart disease in seven countries. I. The study examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses
program and objectives. Circulation 1970;41(4 Suppl):I1–8. of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011;343:d4002.
4. Keys A. Coronary heart disease in seven countries. Summary. 25. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of
Circulation 1970;41(4 Suppl):I186–95.. interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011;Version 5.1.0.
5. Barton S. Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best 26. Comprehensive Meta Analysis Version 2 [ program]. 2 version.
RCT still trumps the best observational study. BMJ 2000;321:255–6. Englewood, NJ: Biostat 2005.
6. Turpeinen O, Karvonen MJ, Pekkarinen M, et al. Dietary prevention 27. Bresson J-L. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Dietetic Products
of coronary heart disease: the Finnish Mental Hospital Study. Int J Nutrition and Allergies on a request from Unilever PLC/NV on Plant
Epidemiol 1979;8:99–118. Sterols and lower/reduced blood cholesterol, reduced the risk of
7. Miettinen M, Turpeinen O, Karvonen MJ, et al. Dietary prevention of (coronary) heart disease. EFSA J 2008;781:1–12.
coronary heart disease in women: the Finnish mental hospital study. 28. United Stated Census Bureau. U.S. Resident Population, 1977.
Int J Epidemiol 1983;12:17–25. 29. Office for National Statistics. Population Estimates for UK, England
8. Truswell AS. Review of dietary intervention studies: effect on and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, Mid-1982 to Mid-1990
coronary events and on total mortality. Aust N Z J Med Population Estimates for England & Wales. Office for National
1994;24:98–106. Statistics, 2003.
9. Hooper L, Summerbell CD, Higgins JPT, et al. Dietary fat intake and 30. CBS News. Exchange between Dr Robert Olson and Senator
prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review. BMJ George McGovern from The United States Senate Select Committee
2001;322:757–63. on Nutrition and Human Needs. Washington, 26 July 1977.
10. Mozaffarian D, Micha R, Wallace S. Effects on coronary heart 31. DiNicolantonio JJ. The cardiometabolic consequences of replacing
disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat: a saturated fats with carbohydrates or Ω-6 polyunsaturated fats: Do
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. the dietary guidelines have it wrong? Open Heart 2014;1:e000032.
PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000252. 32. Chowdhury R, Warnakula S, Kunutsor S, et al. Association of
11. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for Dietary, Circulating, and Supplement Fatty Acids With Coronary
systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med
J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1006–12. 2014;160:398–406.
Harcombe Z, Baker JS, Cooper SM, et al. Open Heart 2015;2:e000196. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2014-000196 7