Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Demi de Block
Ella Selovuori
Lucia Jonova
Martin So
Contents
Introduction 3
Methods (of the review) 5
Search engines and databases 5
Keywords 5
Search strategy 6
Screening 7
Quality check 7
Organizing articles 8
Use of external knowledge 8
Group organization 9
Division of tasks 9
Different roles 10
Role of coach 10
File management 11
Collaboration 11
SMART goals 11
Planning 13
Realistic time table 13
Safety net planning 16
What if? -scenarios 17
References 18
Appendix 19
2
Introduction
Asthma is a heterogeneous disease that is commonly characterized by
chronic airway inflammation, which attributes to symptoms such as; wheezing,
shortness of breath, coughing, and chest tightness that can present itself in varying
degrees of intensity over time. Anatomically we can conclude that asthma is caused
by an inflammatory response in the respiratory system that thickens the airway wall
and results in smooth muscle spasms in the bronchioles, both causing a narrowing of
the lumen making it more difficult to breath. This disease is widely known, as it
affects 300 million people globally with a casualty rate of 250,000 annually. While
there are varying degrees of the severity of asthma, it has been widely documented
that this chronic disease can greatly impair a person's pulmonary functions and
overall quality of life (Gupta et al.,2017). Under most circumstances long-term control
medications, such as inhaled corticosteroids, are used to reduce the airway
inflammation that aggravate asthma symptoms. Tracking symptoms, going in
periodically to a physician to analyze peak flow/forced expiratory volume, and
adjusting medication strength is also commonly practiced (Pruthi et al.,2019). While
these treatment protocols have been used as adequate forms of asthma symptom
control for years, new research has found that there is evidence that introducing
pranayamic breathing is an effective way at aiding in the control of asthma
symptoms.
Pranayama is a breathing technique practiced most often in yoga practices.
“In Sanskrit, pranayama is translated as conscious control of breath. Pranayama
represents a simple self-control technique and involves increasing an individual’s
breath awareness (Erdoğan Yüce et al.,2020). There are more forms of Pranayama
techniques, most of these are practices of breathing through the nose and plays also
with closing and opening one nostril throughout the inhales and exhales. Two most
common forms are “Kumbhaka” (“retention breath”) involves long, deep, consistent
inhalation (“Puraka”) followed by holding the inhalation (“Antara Kumbhaka”),
continues with exhalation (“Rechaka”) and finishes with breath retention (“Bahya
3
Kumbhaka”). The second common type is “Ujjayi” breath (“victorious breath”). Ujjayi
consists of long inhales and exhales without breath retention and it’s done with a
“snoring” like sound. “Studies emphasize that regular pranayama applications have
positive effects on conditions such as chronic bronchitis, asthma, rhinitis, pharyngitis,
obesity, diabetes, hypertension, insulin resistance, heart attack, allergy, anxiety
disorders, and cancer.” (Erdoğan Yüce et al.,2020). However, for the purpose of this
literature review we intend to inquire insight and evidence on the chronic effects that
the pranayamic breathing technique has on reducing asthma patients' symptoms. In
conjunction with patients’ symptoms, we will also be assessing parameters, such as;
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV), Asthma Control Test,
Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), among others. FVC records how
much air you can blow out, while FEV measures how quickly you can do it. ACT is a
self-administered questionnaire tool that helps in identifying those with poorly
controlled asthma. By comparing the changes in these parameters to assess asthma
and completing a literature review on the current evidence, we hope to expand
awareness to increase the use of this technique in physicians and physical therapists
practices.
The possibility of pranayamic breathing positively affecting the management
of asthma symptoms has the potential to create many benefits for asthma patients,
physical therapists, and the community. In regards to asthma patients, it could open
doors to adding a more holistic approach to their treatment regimen. Along with this
gaining more personal breath control of their asthma symptoms could reduce anxiety
that asthma attacks typically induce. Since pranayamic breathing is usually coupled
with yoga practice, adding a daily yoga/breath routine could also increase patients
activity level while additionally decreasing stress levels. Finally, by inadvertently
decreasing the use of asthma patients’ medication use and doctor visits, this would
also relieve some financial stress that these individuals may hold. Benefits that a
physical therapist could have by adopting this technique into their practice would be
increasing their knowledge and expanding their field. Since physical therapy is an
ever changing career, it is important to keep up to date with the most recent and
relevant studies. Reason being, the more tools in a physical therapists’ arsenal, the
better they can be and the more patients they can aid. Mastering the pranayama
technique could even add the possibility of creating a new field of respiratory therapy
to the physical therapy world. Lastly, through creating asthmatic yoga breathing
classes this could bring asthma patients together and could double not only as a
4
treatment class, but also a support group. This would in turn be helpful to the
community by bringing like people together for emotional support.
PICOT question
Keywords
The keywords used were “breathing”; “breath”; “exercise”; “practice”; “technique”;
“yogic”; “yoga”; “pranayama”; “respiration”; “asthma”; “respiratory”; “disorder”. These
keywords were searched in all 3 databases in an advanced search combined with
“OR” and “AND” boolean operators.
Keywords synonyms:
Keyword 1: “yogic” OR “yoga”
Keyword 2: “pranayama”
Keyword 3: “breathing” OR “breath” OR “respiration”
Keyword 4: “exercise” OR “practise” OR “technique”
Keyword 5: “asthma” OR “respiratory” AND “disorder”
5
PeDro PubMed Cochrane Cross TOTAL
Keyword referencing
1 AND 3 AND 5 4 12 12 28
(in title)
2 AND 5 2 5 3 10
(in title)
3 AND 4 AND 5 4 6 4 14
(in title)
TOTAL 10 23 19 12 64
6
Search strategy
The search strategy started with a large amount of articles (5009) found in all 4
databases: Pedro, PubMed, Cochrane and additional Google scholar, which was
later excluded due to its vast content. Some of the studies might be still used in
google scholar if the full text is listed there, shown as cross referencing articles.
Narrowing down the number of articles started with including our keywords only into
the abstract/title. Searches using keywords that involved “yoga” resulted in a larger
amount of articles as well as searches involving “breathing”. When we used the
specific keyword “pranayama”, which is our specific focus, the results listed fewer
articles. With the combination of “asthma” we ended up with a number of articles
feasible for screening (64). After ignoring all duplicates, the number of articles
became 41.
Screening
After exclusion of duplicates the screening process took place.
With the inclusion criteria 1)studies in english(39); 2)studies no older than 2010(35)
With the exclusion criteria 1) studies done with children(33); 2)studies with the
intervention of yoga as a physical and not breathing exercise(23); 3) studies with the
intervention shorter than 4 weeks(17)
With full-text selection the final number of articles will be assessed according to its
grading and eligibility. The measurement tool used in the articles to evaluate the
results will be compared. We are interested in which articles used standard drug
therapy alongside pranayama practises and the effects on it’s results. We want to
know which studies applied a different type of intervention with pranayama. As well
as the number of participants and the severity of Asthma.
Quality check
Out of a variety of measurement tools, the PEDro scale was chosen to assess the
quality of the articles. PEDro scale is a valid measuring tool to assess the
methodological quality of clinical trials (Natalie, 2009). There are 11 criteria in the
7
PEDro grading schedule. Criterion 1 is about the generalisability of the trial, which is
not used to calculate the PEDro score reported on the PEDro website. Criteria 2-9
are related to internal validation of the articles and criteria while 10-11 examine the
presence of sufficient statistical information to interpret the result.
It was determined that a PEDro score of 6 or higher would be the selection baseline
for articles in the systemic review. It was based on research conducted by Hariohm.
Studies score below 6 were considered fair or poor quality (Hariohm et al., 2015). It
ensures the quality of articles selected up to a certain standard.
Organizing articles
All articles are downloaded in pdf format and are stored in a shared google file. The
articles are arranged in alphabetical order.
8
literature review, we will counsel the lecturer of Evidence-Based Practice, Nils
Jongerius for improvements of methodology approach.
Group organization
Division of tasks
Tasks for the project plan were divided within the group by discussing together and
according to each member’s preference. Workload of task was taken into
consideration when dividing tasks. The whole group decided together on the PICOT
question. Usage of search engines was divided randomly. All members were
responsible for searching articles meeting with inclusion and exclusion criteria. Final
screening of articles was done by Lucia. Task division for the project plan is
presented on the table below.
9
Quality, organizing Martin Lucia
articles and use of
external knowledge
Task division for literature review was done with the same principle as the task
division for the project plan, by each member’s preference and joint discussion.
There’s a chance this plan will change, but the group will do it’s best to stick to the
plan. The same people, who were responsible for introduction and methods chapters,
will continue with the same task during semester 3 updating and correcting previously
written chapters.
Roles
Roles between group members were divided by preference. Lucia is the leader of the
group and communicates with the coach and other group members. Ella is the
secretary and updates documents with content of the group's meetings, what was
discussed, which tasks are done and yet to be done. Backup of the files is done by
the secretary as well.
10
We expect the coach to provide guidance and point us in the right direction in order
for us to finish the project with high quality. We ensure this by asking advice on our
regular meetings with the coach.
File management
The team leader Lucia created a Google Drive folder that was shared to the whole
group. The folder is an efficient way to store and manage a large amount of files. All
group members are able to update and edit the documents at any time. The group
has concluded that the shared Drive folder works well and is a safe place to store
information. The same system will be used during semester 3.
The folder contains a file where all articles for the review are stored, so the entire
group can access the articles at all times. In the folder, tables of task division and
timetable can also be found. This makes it possible for each member to follow
whether the group is well on time and makes sure that all the tasks are taken care of.
Updating the file with all minutes of the group's meetings is the secretary’s
responsibility.
Collaboration
Communication happens only virtually since it is not possible to organize meetings in
person. Communication happens mostly through a whatsapp group. The group
schedules weekly video call meetings where progress is discussed. Meeting times
are set well in advance accustomed to everyone’s schedules, ensuring that the whole
group will be able to attend.
SMART goals
Each group member thought of an individual goal that also relates to the group
project and is something we can learn during semester 2 and apply for the rest of our
ESP career.
11
tasks on time and sticking to our group’s
internal deadlines, as this benefits the
whole group and me. I aim to do this by
writing a weekly schedule on my agenda.
By organizing my time well during this
project I believe it’ll be helpful during the
rest of the semester and next year in ESP.
Goal for the whole group Collaboration skill is not only vital to the
PAP project in the next academic year, but
also to our future career path as a
physiotherapist according to the KNGF
profile.Therefore our team goal is to ensure
everyone in the group is actively
12
participating and contributing. A peer review
within our group will be conducted, so that
everyone in the group can understand their
strengths and weaknesses respectively.
Planning
Realistic time table:
The time tables below were created in consideration to keep everyone organized and
on track to meet the intended deadline. Below the timeline for the project plan and
literature review are listed. The planning for the internal and external deadlines for
the project plan (Table 4.) was tight since we started our project plan relatively late.
This caused us to have to work overtime in the last week before the project plan was
due with no buffer week in between. Starting this earlier would have allowed us to
take our time and be able to look through everything more thoroughly.
Table 6. Time table for the project plan outline including the task responsibility of each group
member with internal (I) and external (E) deadlines.
13
16 17-04-20 I Create and edit time Demi
schedule table
Writing All
The time table for the literature review is written with deadlines taken from the EBP 3
course manual in mind. These deadlines are of course subject to change, but for
now this is the best estimate that we can make with the circumstances given to us.
14
In order to stay on track and well ahead, internal deadlines were set consciously at
least a week ahead of the suggested deadline in order to have time to look over our
work and provide the best quality project plan. Presented below in Table 5 is the
literature review project plan.
Table 7. Timetable for the literature review including the task responsibility of each group
member with internal (I) and external (E) deadlines.
15
41 08-10-20 E Literature review
take
42 I Work on All
improvements
What if..?
The following table includes potential crisis scenarios and prevention taken.
Table 8. What if? -scenarios, their possibility to happen, the level of threat and actions for the
scenario to be avoided. L = low, M = moderate, H = high.
16
The action plan is L H We make use of a
not yet finished buffer week before
before the the official deadline
submission
deadline
References
Aggarwal T, Khatrl A, Siddiqui S, Hasan S, Singh D, Kulshreshtha M et al. Pranayama has
additive beneficial effect along with medication in bronchial asthma patients. Indian journal of
physiology and pharmacology. 2012;(12):77-78.
de Morton N. The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical
trials: a demographic study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2009;55(2):129-133.
17
Hussein H, Afify A, Obaya H, Rafea A. Effects of Ujjayi Pranayama Training on Selected
Ventilatory Function Test in Patients with Mild Bronchial Asthma. Medical Journal of Cario
University. 2016;84(2):445-452.
Maher C, Sherrington C, Herbert R, Moseley A, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro Scale for
Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials. Physical Therapy. 2003;83(8):713-721.
Prem V, Sahoo R, Adhikari P. Comparison of the effects of Buteyko and pranayama breathing
techniques on quality of life in patients with asthma – a randomized controlled trial. Clinical
Rehabilitation. 2012;27(2):133-141.
Pruthi S. Asthma treatment: 3 steps to better asthma control [Internet]. Rochester; Mayo
Clinic. 2019 [cited 19 April 2020]. URL:
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/asthma/in-depth/asthma-treatment/art-20044
284
Purwar S, Sushma R, Yadav S. OA01.18. Clinical evaluation of Amritadi kwatha along with
pranayama in the management of Tamaka swasa w.s.r. bronchial asthma. Ancient Science of
Life. 2012;32(5):18.
Putra M, Sriyono S, Yasmara D. Yoga Pranayama Increase Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) in
Patient with Asthma. Advances in Health Sciences Research. 2017;3:207-210.
Saxena T, Saxena M. The effect of various breathing exercises (pranayama) in patients with
bronchial asthma of mild to moderate severity. International Journal of Yoga. 2009;2(1):22.
Shobha B. A clinical study on Shringyadi Churna with and without Pranayama in the
management of Tamaka Shwasa (bronchial asthma). Global Journal of Research on
Medicinal Plants & Indigenous. 2013;2(3):172-177.
18
Appendix
2 1 month
Effect of pranayama breathing technique ? patients
on asthma control, pulmonary function, Quality of life questionnaire was
and quality of life: A single-blind, used and patient observation chart
randomized, controlled trial. Measured by: (ACT), Asthma Quality
of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ),
pulmonary function test (PFT), and
patient observation chart
3
Pranayama has additive beneficial effect 80:pranayama group
along with medication in
bronchial asthma patients 20: controlled group
3 months
5 12 weeks
The effect of various breathing exercises 50 patients
(pranayama) in patients with bronchial Pranayama and meditation
asthma of mild to moderate severity
6 Effect 30 patients
of pranayama (rachaka, 75 days
puraka and kumbhaka) on
bronchial asthma. An open
study
19
8 Yoga Pranayama Increase 6 pranayama group
Peak Expiratory Flow 6 controlled group
(PEF) in Patient ? days
with Asthma 2017
20
15 Effect of anulom 20 patients
vilom pranayama as an 4 weeks
adjuvant treatment Measured by level of
modality to improve the dyspnea (one of the
level of dyspnea in asthma symptoms)
chronic asthma patients Anulom-vilom(type of
pranayama)
21