Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
PHILIPPINE FISHERIES
Submitted to:
Submitted by:
Mendoza, Marvin
Navarro, Shareyde F.
OUTLINE OF REPORT:
1
I. THESIS STATEMENT
III. BACKGROUND
V. INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
IX. CONCLUSION
X. BIBLIOGRAPHY
I. THESIS STATEMENT
2
The Philippines is known to have one of the richest fishery resources. However,
illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing (IUUF) practices have substantially
caused the depletion of same to an alarming level. This study aims to explore the
current situation of the country’s fisheries after the passage of more comprehensive
and pervasive amendatory fishery law and particularly focuses on issues on the local
level in relation to sustainability and livelihood.
RA 8550
10. Commercial Fishing — the taking of fishery species by passive or active gear for
trade, business & profit beyond subsistence or sports fishing, to be further classified
as:
Small scale commercial fishing — fishing with passive or active gear utilizing fishing
vessels of 3.1 gross tons (GT) up to twenty (20) GT;
Medium scale commercial fishing — fishing utilizing active gears and vessels of 20.1
GT up to one hundred fifty (150) GT; and
Large commercial fishing — fishing utilizing active gears and vessels of more than
one hundred fifty (150) GT.
Commercial Scale — a scheme of producing a minimum harvest per hectare per year
of milkfish or other species including those raised in pens, cages, and tanks to be
determined by the Department in consultation with the concerned sectors;
57. Municipal fishing - refers to fishing within municipal waters using fishing vessels
of three (3) gross tons or less, or fishing not requiring the use of fishing vessels.
58. Municipal waters - include not only streams, lakes, inland bodies of water and
tidal waters within the municipality which are not included within the protected
areas as defined under Republic Act No. 7586 (The NIPAS Law), public forest, timber
lands, forest reserves or fishery reserves, but also marine waters included between
two (2) lines drawn perpendicular to the general coastline from points where the
boundary lines of the municipality touch the sea at low tide and a third line parallel
with the general coastline including offshore islands and fifteen (15) kilometers
from such coastline. Where two (2) municipalities are so situated on opposite shores
that there is less than thirty (30) kilometers of marine waters between them, the
third line shall be equally distant from the opposite shore of the respective
municipalities.
3
The municipality/City government, in coordination with FARMC, enact appropriate
ordinances for this purpose and in accordance with the National Fisheries Policy .
The ordinance enacted by the municipality and component city shall be reviewed
pursuant to RA 7160 by their sanggunian of the province which has jurisdiction over
the same. The LGUs shall also enforce all fishery laws, rules and regulations as well
as valid fishery ordinances enacted by the municipality/city councilor.
Sec. 17. Grant of fishing privileges in municipal waters. -- The duly registered
fisherfolk organization/cooperatives shall have preferences in the grant of fishery
rights by the Municipal/City Council pursuant to Section 149 of the Local
Government Code: Provided, that the in the area where there are special agencies or
offices vested with jurisdiction over municipal water by virtue of special law
creating these agencies such as, but not limited to the Laguna Lake Development
Authority and the Palawan Council for Sustainable Development, said offices and
agencies shall continue to grant permits for proper management and
implementation of the aforementioned structures.
Sec. 18. Users of Municipal Waters -- All fishery related activities in municipal
waters, as defined in this Code, shall be utilized by municipal fisherfolk and their
cooperatives/organizations who are listed as such in the registry of municipal
fisherfolk.
The municipal or city government, however, may, through its local chief executive
and acting pursuant to an appropriate ordinance, authorize or permit shall and
medium commercial fishing vessels to operate within the then point one (10.1) to
fifteen (15) kilometer area from the shoreline in municipal waters as defined herein,
provided, that all the following are met:
a. no commercial fishing in municipal waters with depth less than seven (7) fathoms
as certified by the appropriate agency;
b. fishing activities utilizing methods and gears that are determined to be consistent
with national polices set by the Department.
c. prior consultation, through public hearing, with the M/CFARMC has been
conducted; and
d. the applicant vessel as well as the ship owner, employer, captain and crew have
been certified by the appropriate agency as not having violated this Code,
environmental laws and related laws.
In no case shall the authorization or permit mentioned above be granted for fishing
in bays as determined by the Department to be in an environmentally critical
condition and during closed season as provided for in Section 9 of this Code.
RA 7160
4
Sec. 149 -- (a) Municipalities shall have the exclusive authority to grant fishery
privileges in the municipal waters and impose rentals, fees or charges therefor in
accordance with the provisions of this section.
(b) (1) Grant fishery privileges to erect fish corrals, oyster, mussels or other aquatic
beds or bangus fry areas, within a definite zone of the municipal waters, as
determined by it: Provided, however, That duly registered organizations and
cooperatives of marginal fishermen shall have the preferential right to such fishery
privileges: Provided, further, That the sangguniang bayan may require a public
bidding in conformity with and pursuant to an ordinance for the grant of such
privileges: Provided, finally, That in the absence of such organizations and
cooperatives or their failure to exercise their preferential right, other parties may
participate in the public bidding in conformity with the above cited procedure.
(2) Grant the privilege to gather, take or catch bangus fry, prawn fry or kawag-kawag
or fry of other species and fish from the municipal waters by nets, traps or other
fishing gears to marginal fishermen free of any rental, fee, charge or any other
imposition whatsoever.
(3) Issue licenses for the operation of fishing vessels of three (3) tons or less for
which purpose the sangguniang bayan shall promulgate rules and regulations
regarding the issuances of such licenses to qualified applicants under existing laws.
III. BACKGROUND
5
In 2017, the Philippines had a population of about 103 million, and mean per capita
consumption of fish and fishery products of 40 kg/year or 109 grams/day with the
percent of fish and fishery products intake to the total intake at 12.8%. In 2015, the
fishing industry contributed 1.5% and 1.7% at current and constant prices,
respectively, to the country’s gross domestic products (GDP) with the fisheries
sector providing employment to over 1.6 million people, 85% of whom were from
the municipal fisheries and 1% from commercial fisheries, while the aquaculture
sector employed 14% .However, the state of the country’s resources in municipal
waters is lightly to heavily exploited and overfished. Our commercial fishing is
classified into three sectors : the small scale sectors which makes use of passive or
active gear and utilizing fishing vessels of 3.1-20 GT, the medium scale sector which
utilizes active gears and vessels of 20.1-150 GT, and the large scale sector which
utilizes active gears and vessels of more than 150 GT. As to the status and trends of
our country’s fish production, our ountry is one of the top fish producing countries
in the world. The total volume of fisheries production in the Philippines in 2015
reached 4.65 million MT with the total value of US$ 7.26 billion. The country’s
municipal fisheries contributed 1.01 million MT or 21.7% of the total fish production
in 2015. In 2015, commercial fisheries contributed 1.08 million MT or 23.3% to the
country’s total fisheries production. Indian sardine contributed the most, 217,758
MT or 20%. Skipjack provided 199,152.50 MT (18%), followed by round scad and
yellowfin tuna that contributed 164,443.04 MT (15%) and 102,400.30 metric tons
(10%), respectively. In 2016, the country’s total number of commercial fishing fleet
comprised 3,473 vessels that were licensed by BFAR. The major commercial fishing
gears used are ring net, trawl, handline, purse seine, bag net, and longline. Our
country’s inland fishing production on the other hand, contributed 204,733.99 MT or
4.4% to the total fisheries production in 2015. The bulk of the catch came from
Laguna Bay, Lake Lanao, and Taal Lake that cover 74% of the country’s total area of
lakes. As to our Aquaculture, it has a strong potential for further expansion and
development in view of the availability of vast resources (338,393 ha of swampland,
14,531 ha of freshwater fishponds, 239,323 ha of brackishwater fishponds, 200,000
ha of lakes, 31,000 ha of rivers, and 19,000 ha of reservoirs). In the Philippines,
aquaculture is categorized according to environment, farming system, farming
technology, and production. As to our fish utilization, the country’s fish catch are
sold in local markets although significant portion especially shrimps are shipped to
Manila or other urban areas. Around 70% of the catch is consumed fresh or chilled,
while 30% is processed (cured, canned, frozen products or disposed of live). The
bulk of cured fish and fishery products are consumed locally, while only a small
quantity is exported as ethnic products. As to our fish trade, Tuna remained as the
country’s top export commodity with a volume of 97,815 MT as fresh/chilled/frozen,
smoked/dried, and canned tuna products valued at US$ 231 million. The three major
export commodities (tuna, seaweeds, shrimp/prawn) combined account for 63%
(153,667 MT) of the total export volume (226,821 MT) and 58% (US$ 531,333
million) of the total export value of US$ 909 million. Other exported major fishery
products, e.g. crabs, crab fats, octopus, grouper, cuttlefish, squid, ornamental fish,
round scad, and sea cucumber constitute 21% or US$ 189 million of the total export
revenues. The other commodities accounted for the remaining 21% of the total
export value. In terms of value, the major destinations of Philippine fishery products
are USA (24%), Japan (13%), Hong Kong (9%), Germany (6%), China (4.8%), Taiwan
(3.7%), UK (3.6%), Spain (3.3%), Netherlands (2.1%), South Korea (1.9%), and
6
others (28%). As an end note, gender-equality, policies specifically leaning towards
women, , have also been enacted in relation to managing our fisheries as provided
for implementing rules and regulations of the magna carta of women.
7
ILLEGAL, UNREPORTED AND UNREGULATED FISHING; EFFECTS ON FISHERS
The Philippine archipelago is one of the largest of fish-producing nations in the
world. Millions of people rely on fishing as a source of livelihood. Like many other
countries gifted which such natural resource, the Philippines is facing overfishing
crisis caused by illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing. Of the country’s
13 major fishing grounds, 10 are overfished (edf.org). Such problem not only
weakens efforts to manage fisheries sustainably, it also threatens the food and
livelihood security of coastal communities. Marine biodiversity loss and fisheries
decline have a significant impact on Filipinos, as fish provide more than 50% of
their dietary protein and serve as an important source of nutrients. Collapsed
fisheries would be economically devastating for fisherfolk families. Small-scale or
municipal fishers estimated to be 1.7 million, already face higher proverty rates
and are considered among the poorest of the poor; 4 out of 10 Filipino fishers live
below the poverty line, catching an average of 3 kg/day and earning about
P195/day.
REFORMS ON LAW
RA 10654, which amended RA 8550 or the Philippine Fisheries Code, lapsed into law
on February 27, 2015. It’s object is to “prevent, deter and eliminate illegal,
unreported and unregulated” or IUU fishing in the country. Under said law, sanctions
have been raised to as high as P45 million for commercial fishing violators, and $2.4
million for poachers.
Before such amendment, illegal commercial fishing was rampant because of the slow
administration of justice but the amendatory law has given the Bureau of Fisheries
and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) more power in the campaign against illegal fishing
and preservation of marine life. It mandated the creation of an Adjudication
Committee under BFAR, which would speed up the determination of liability of
violators and imposition of penalties.
Large commercial fishing vessels tend to encroach upon municipal waters which are
reserved for local fisherfolks. One of the most significant features of RA 10654 is the
installation of a Monitoring, Control and Surveillance (MCS) system in “all Philippine
flagged fishing vessels regardless of fishing area and final destination of catch,”
which is intended to ensure compliance with fisheries regulations of this large
fishing vessels. BFAR is assisted by NOAA to improve its vessel monitoring system.
With support from USAID, NOAA is training the Bureau and other enforcement
agencies in setting up and analyzing information on an Alert System for Boat
Detection for municipal waters and seasonal closure of critical fisheries.
From July 2016 to June 2017, BFAR has filed 863 cases against fishing operators
over illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing activities nationwide. Of the
total number, BFAR 6 has racked up 238 cases during the period. The Bureau of
Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) Regional Office 6 has the most number of
cases filed on illegal fishing among sixteen regions of the country. BFAR 6 conducts
8
all its seaborne and land-based operations in cooperation with the Iloilo Police
Provincial Office, Philippine Coast Guard, Philippine National Police – Maritime
Group, Maritime Industry Authority, local government units, Provincial Government
of Iloilo, Provincial Environment and Management Office of Negros Occidental and
other law enforcement agencies. Data from BFAR 6 showed that 40 percent of the
238 cases filed are violations related to the following: active gears in the municipal
waters; use of fine mesh nets; use of destructive fishing gears and methods; blast
fishing; and electrofishing and use of noxious substances.
In the Eastern Visayas region, a key official from the fishery sector has expressed
alarm over record breaking drop of fishery production therein during the first
quarter of 2018. The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) reported that fishery
production in Eastern Visayas dropped by 29 percent from 37,607 metric tons (MT)
in the first quarter of 2017 to 26,704 MT in the same period this year. BFAR said the
overall output is largely driven by commercial fishing decline. There has been a
reduction in commercial fisheries, brought by the intensified patrol operations,
inclement weather and decrease in the number of licensed commercial fishing
vessels.
Not everyone is happy about the law and the penalties meted against its violators.
Resistance to change is still evident. In some places, fish bombers threaten
authorities with automatic weapons and the same bombs they use to blow up fish. In
Palawan, there is a continuing exploitation of almost all forms of local wildlife largely
because the vast majority of habitat is owned and managed by clans, villages, and
district councils. Authors speculate that the local government bodies therein choose
not to enforce national laws that conflict with their traditional lifestyles. Most people
in this area still highly rely upon food gathered from the forests and ocean to survive.
Considering the traditional dependency of people on wild resources, cultural
sentiments and livelihoods, any interventions for fisheries conservation must have
9
the support of local inhabitants, which will necessitate offering alternative
livelihoods.
There are efforts to educate fishermen that although cyanide and dynamite fishing
helps increase the day’s catch, they destroy that goose that lay the golden egg in the
long run. Environmental groups are encouraging fishermen to use traditional fishing
methods and to realize that the reefs are a resource that must be preserved. Villagers
are encouraged to establish offshore fish farms, seaweed farms and to set up “fish-
aggregation devices”—floating platforms anchored in the water that attract algae
and fish.
10
A. CURRENT LAWS AND BILLS
The following laws are listed according to hierarchy: from pertinent provisions of
the Philippine Constitution, to national laws and international treaties and
agreements, to Executive Orders of the President, to Administrative Orders and
Circulars issued by government agencies. The role of ordinances enacted by local
government units is also briefly discussed. In each section, the laws are listed in
reverse chronological order, from the most recent to the oldest. (oneocean.org)
The following provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution lay down the State
policies and principles significant to the coastal environment and to the rights of the
people to the country’s coastal resources.
Article II, Section 15 -- “The State shall protect and promote the right to health of
the people…”
11
Article II, Section 16 -- “The State shall protect and advance the right of the people
to a balanced and healthful ecology in accord with the rhythm and harmonyof
nature.”
Article XII, Section 2 -- “All lands of the public domain, waters, minerals, coal,
petroleum, and other mineral oils, all forces of potential energy, fisheries, forests or
timber, wildlife, flora and fauna, and other natural resources are owned by the State.
With the exception of agricultural lands, all other natural resources shall not be
alienated. The exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources shall be
under the full control and supervision of the State. The State may directly undertake
such activities, or it may enter into co-production, joint venture, or production-
sharing agreements with Filipino citizens, or corporations or associations at least
sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens. Suchagreements may be
for a period not exceeding twenty-five years, renewable for not more than twenty-
five years, and under such terms and conditions as may be provided by law. In cases
of water rights for irrigation, water supply, fisheries, or industrial uses other than
the development of water power, beneficial use may be the measure and limit of the
grant.
“The State shall protect the nation’s marine wealth in its archipelagic waters,
territorial sea and exclusive economic zone, and reserve its use and enjoyment
exclusively to Filipino citizens.
Article XIII, Section 7 -- “The State shall protect the rights of subsistence
fishermen,\ especially of local communities, to the preferential use of the
communal marine and fishing resources, both inland and offshore. It shall
providesupport to such fishermen through appropriate technology and research,
adequate financial, production, and marketing assistance, and other services. The
State shall also protect, develop, and conserve such resources. The protection shall
extend to offshore fishing grounds of subsistence fishermen against foreign
intrusion. Fishworkers shall receive a just share from their labor in the utilization of
marine and fishing resources.”
Some laws listed below might appear as having nothing to do with the coastal
environment. These were included as they contain provisions applicable to some
aspects of coastal law enforcement. An example would be the Labor Code of the
Philippines, which covers agricultural workers, including fishworkers.
12
RA 9367 (2007) Bio fuels Act of 2006 (provisions on water effluents in accordance
with RA 9175)
RA 6969 (1990) Toxic Substance, Hazardous and Nuclear Waste Control Act of 1990
(prohibits the entry and transit of hazardous and nuclear wastes within Philippine
territorial waters)
13
PD 1198 (1977) Requiring All Individuals, Partnerships or Corporations Engaged in
the Exploration, Development or Exploitation of Natural Resources or in the
Construction of Infrastructure Projects to Restore or Rehabilitate to Their Original
Condition Areas Subject Thereof or Affected Thereby
International Treaties and Agreements, once ratified by the Senate, become part
of Philippine law. Section 21 of the 1987 Constitution provides that treaties and
international agreements are valid and take effect when concurred with by at least
two-thirds of the Senate.
14
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987)
Executive Orders are acts of the President which provide for rules of a general or
permanent character to implement constitutional or statutory powers (De Leon,
1998).
EO No. 149 (1993) Streamlining the Office of the President, Resulting to the Transfer
of Administrative Supervision of the Laguna Lake Development Authority to the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
EO No. 927 (1983) Further Defining Certain Functions and Powers of the Laguna
Lake Development Authority
15
EO No. 525 (1979) Designating the Public Estates Authority as the Agency Primarily
Responsible For All Reclamation Projects
Many of the AOs in this list cite related but older AOs as an additional reference.
Some of these earlier AOs are still effective, as they have not been expressly
repealed, and may contain provisions that remain consistent with newer AOs.
Older AOs that have been supplanted by the newer AOs are still cited because they
contain definitions that may prove useful in interpreting the newer AOs. If anything
else, these repealed AOs are still helpful in giving the reader a historical perspective
of the development of policies regarding the covered subjects.
FAO 225 (Series of 2007) Allowing the Importation of the Brood Stock of Pacific
White Shrimp, Penaeus vannamei, and the Culture of the Offspring Thereof
FAO 223-1 (Series of 2004) Amending Sec. 1 and 2 of FAO No. 223 Series of 2003 Re:
Moratorium on the Issuance of New Commercial Fishing Vessel and Gear License
(CFVGL)
16
FAO 221 (Series of 2003) Further Regulating the Importation of Live Fish and
Fishery/Aquatic Products under FAO No. 135 s. 1981 to Include Microorganisms and
Biomolecules
FAO 214 (Series of 2001) Code of Practice for Aquaculture (see FAO 160 s. 1986:
Rules and Regulations Governing the Construction, Establishment or Operation of
Fishpens and Fish Cages in Philippines; FAO 161 s. 1986: Revised Rules and
Regulations Governing the Issuance of Lease for Pearl Culture; FAO 168 s. 1990:
Rules and Regulations Governing the Gathering, Culture and Exportation of Shelled
Mollusks [Phylum Mollusca])
FAO 210 (Series of 2001) Rules and Regulations on the Exportation of Fresh, Chilled
and Frozen Fish and Fishery/Aquatic Products (see FAO 162 s. 1986: Rules and
Regulations Governing the Issuance of Permit for the Exportation of Live Mud Crabs
or Alimango (Scylla serrata); FAO 168 s. 1990: Rules and Regulations Governing the
Gathering, Culture and Exportation of Shelled Mollusks [Phylum Mollusca])
FAO 207 (Series of 2001) Prohibiting the Importation and Culture of Imported Live
Shrimp and Prawn of All Stages (see FAO 189 s. 1993: Prohibiting the Importation of
Live Shrimp and Prawn of All Stages)
FAO 206 (Series of 2001) Disposal of Confiscated Fish and Other Items in Fishing
through Explosives and Noxious or Poisonous Substances
17
FAO 203 (Series of 2000) Banning Fishing by means of “Muro-ami” and the Like
Destructive to Coral Reefs and Other Marine Habitats (see FAO 163 s. 1986:
Prohibition on the Operation of “Muro-ami” and “Kayakas” in All Philippine Waters)
FAO 202 (Series of 2000) Ban on Coral Exploitation and Exportation (see FAO 184 s.
1992: Guidelines on the Experimental Collection of Precious and Semi-precious
Corals in Philippine Waters)
FAO 201 (Series of 2000) Ban on Fishing with Active Gear (see FAO 156 s. 1986:
Guidelines and Procedures in the Effective Implementation of Letter of Instruction
[LOI] No. 1328; FAO 164 s. 1997: Rules and Regulations Governing the Operation
of Hulbot-hulbot in the Philippines Waters; FAO 188 s. 1993: Regulations Governing
the Operation of Commercial Fishing Boats in Philippine Waters Using Tuna Purse
Seine Nets; FAO 190 s. 1994: Regulations Governing Pa-aling Fishing Operation in
Philippine Waters)
FAO 198 (Series of 2000) Rules and Regulations on Commercial Fishing (see FAO
156 s. 1986: Covers Regulations Prohibiting the Operation of Commercial Trawl and
Purse Seine in Marine Water Areas Within a Distance of Seven Kilometers from the
Shoreline; FAO 188 s. 1993: Regulations Governing the Operation of Commercial
Fishing Boats in Philippine Waters Using Tuna Purse Seine Nets; FAO 190 s. 1994:
Regulations Governing Pa-aling Fishing
FAO 197 (Series of 2000) Rules and Regulations Governing the Lease of Public Lands
for Fishponds Development (see FAO 125 s. 1979: Rules and Regulations Governing
Conversion of Ordinary Fishpond Permits and Ten (10) Year Fishpond Lease
Agreements into Twenty-Five (25) Year Fishpond Lease Agreements and Other
Related Matters)
FAO 193 (Series of 1998) Ban on the Taking, Catching, Selling, Purchasing and
Possessing, Transporting and Exporting of Whale Sharks and Manta Rays
18
FAO 191 (Series of 1994) Employment of Foreign Crew Members Aboard Highly
Specialized Commercial Fishing Vessels
FAO 189 (Series of 1993) Prohibiting the Importation of Live Shrimp and Prawn of
All Stages
FAO 183 (Series of 1992) Prohibiting the Importation of Yellow Fin Tuna and Tuna
Products from Certain Countries
FAO 173-1 (Series of 1991) Amending Section 1 of FAO No. 173 s. 1991, Banning the
Exportation of Bangus Fingerlings (Hatirin)
FAO 168 (Series of 1990) Rules and Regulations Governing the Gathering, Culture
and Exportation of Shelled Mollusks (Phylum Mollusca)
FAO 164 (Series of 1997) Rules and Regulations Governing the Operation of Hulbot-
Hulbot in the Philippines Waters
FAO 162 (Series of 1986) Rules and Regulations Governing the Issuance of Permit
for the Exportation of Live Mud Crabs or Alimango (Scylla serrata)
FAO 161 (Series of 1986) Revised Rules and Regulations Governing the Issuance of
Lease for Pearl Culture
19
FAO 156-1 (Series of 1986) Prohibition on the Gathering, Taking, Collecting, Selling,
Transporting, or Possessing of Mollusk Belonging to the Genus Triton and Cassis
FAO 155-1 (Series of 1994) Amending Section 2 of FAO No. 155, Regulating the Use
of Fine-meshed Nets in Fishing
FAO 68 (Series of 1968) Amending Section 2 of FAO No. 36, prohibiting the Killing,
Gathering, Possessing and Selling of Marine Turtles
FAO 36 Establishing a Closed Season Period for the Gathering or Killing of Marine
Turtles, Turtle Eggs and Turtle Shells
DAO 20 (Series of 2007) Rules and Regulations governing the issuance of permit
over reclamation projects and Special Patents over reclaimed lands
DAO 17 (Series of 2007) Rules and Regulations governing Special Uses within
Protected Area (provisions on sustainable ecotourism, irrigation/waterways and
aquaculture within Protected Areas)
DMC 1 (Series of 2006) Non-titling of lands and areas suitable for fishery
purposes/operations even within alienable and disposable (A&D) lands
DMC Jan. 5, 2006, Re: Cancellation of all existing IFMA, ITPLA, SIFMA & CBFMA
subject to certain exceptions (superseded by DENR Special Order 2006 – 371 re:
20
Creating a DENR Committee on Appeals to review and evaluate appeals of cancelled
ITPLAs, IFMAs SIFMAs and CBFMAs)
DAO 30 (Series of 2003) Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) for the
Philippine Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) System
DAO 83 (Series of 2000) Guidelines for the Management and Development of Small
Islands, including Its Coastal Areas
21
DAO 68 (Series of 2000) Institutionalization of the DSPWIEMD and Related
Functions
DAO 17 (Series of 1999) Updating DAO No. 35 s. 1990, otherwise known as the
Revised Effluent Regulations of 1990, Revising and Amending the Effluent
Regulations of 1982
DAO 39 (Series of 1997) Chemical Control Order for Cyanide and Cyanide
Compounds
DAO 17 (Series of 1997) Establishing the Disposition Program for Confiscated and
Donated Wildlife in the Custody of DENR Wildlife Rescue Centers and Similar DENR
Facilities and Providing Guidelines Thereof
DAO 5 (Series of 1997) Procedures in the Retention of Areas within CBFM Areas
DAO 29 (Series of 1996) Rules and Regulations for the Implementation of EO 263,
Otherwise Known as the Community–based Forest Management Strategy (CBFMS)
22
DAO 19 (Series of 1993) Establishing the Coastal Environment Program (CEP) and
Providing Funds Therefor
DAO 3 (Series of 1991) Policy and Guidelines for the Award and Administration of
the Mangrove Stewardship Agreement
23
Bureau of Forestry Development Circular 2 (Series of 1979) Regulations for the
Conservation of Marine Turtles in the Philippines
Office Order Nos. 57 and 25 (Series of 2008) Creating a Task Force for
Environmental Concerns
Office Order No. 16 (Series of 2004) Creating the Office of the Environmental
Ombudsman
Supreme Court issuances are acts of the High Court designed to govern the
implementation of rules of procedures to be implemented in all courts within the
country.
AO No. 23 (Series of 2008) Designation of Special Courts to Hear, Try and Decide
Environmental Cases
24
Administrative Memorandum No. 05-8-26-SC (2005) Amendment of Rules 112 and
114 of the Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure by Removing the Conduct of
Preliminary Investigation from Judges of the First Level Courts
An application of this is the ban on the use of compressors in fishing. While there is
no express prohibition in RA 8550 regarding the use of compressors in fishing, it is
commonly known that they are employed as breathing device by fishers using
cyanide, which is by itself destructive and prohibited by law. That the use of
compressors as a breathing device is detrimental to the health of fishers and
fishworkers is also a concern that has been raised. Several cities and municipalities
have filled the gap left by RA 8550 by enacting ordinances that ban the mere
possession of compressors on board a banca, or by a fisher.
Ordinances, when carefully crafted, may also prove to be a greater deterrent for
coastal law offenders, even though under RA 7160, the maximum imposable penalty
by legal ordinance is only a fine of Php2,500 and imprisonment of 6 months.
Violations of RA 8550 are often penalized by a fine and/or imprisonment; the court,
at its discretion, usually imposes only a minimal fine. Violators are not deterred from
criminal acts, and usually even plead guilty to the crimes, because the fine is a very
small fraction of their profit from illegal activities.
Local government units, on the other hand, may enact fishery ordinances with a
minimum penalty of both fine and imprisonment, leaving no discretion to the court.
This will ensure that violators not only pay the fine, but are also imprisoned when
they plead guilty. To increase the amount of the fine, and therefore discourage
violators from committing the crime again, the Php2,500-maximum fine may be
imposed per individual just as RA 8550 does (e.g. for each crew member in a fleet of
illegal commercial fishing vessels) instead of per violation. Aside from this, the
ordinance may also include as penalty the confiscation of fishing vessels and all its
appurtenances, fishing gears, and fish catch to prevent offenders from using these in
other crimes.
25
Senate Bill No. 1641
THE PHILIPPINE FISHERIES PROFESSION ACT
Filed on January 9, 2018 by Trillanes, Antonio "Sonny" F., Legarda, Loren B., Villar,
Cynthia A.
AN ACT REGULATING THE PRACTICE OF FISHERIES PROFESSION IN THE
PHILIPPINES, CREATING FOR THE PURPOSE A PROFESSIONAL REGULATORY
BOARD OF FISHERIES AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR
The Senate approved today on third and final reading a bill which would create a
professional regulatory board and legal framework to regulate the practice of
fisheries profession in the Philippines. Senate Bill No. 1641 was authored by Senator
Antonio Trillanes IV, chair of the Senate Committee on Civil Service, Government
Reorganization and Professional Regulation, along with Senators Loren Legarda and
Cynthia Villar.
The bill was approved with 21 affirmative votes, zero negative vote and no
abstention.
Trillanes, who sponsored the bill, said the measure sought to provide a program
which would "set up an appropriate and healthy environment for the practice of the
fisheries profession." "It is high time that we address the gaps and the government
shortcomings in the fisheries profession by creating a professional regulatory board
and legal framework, for the profession," he said.
The bill, Trillanes added, would also "establish quality standards for fisheries
professionals that would guide fisheries schools or colleges in updating their
curriculum," consistent with other professional regulatory laws passed by Congress.
Under the bill, a 'Professional Board of Fisheries' will be created under the
supervision of the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC). The fisheries
profession will be integrated "into one national professional organization, through
the Accredited Integrated Professional Organization to be recognized by the PRC
through the new Board of Fisheries."
26
professionals, not only to make them more globally competitive, but also to enable
them to render greater service to our country and our people," Trillanes said.
Trillanes said that practitioners in the fisheries industry believe that the fisheries
should be an industry and profession separate from the agriculture sector, citing
national laws like RA 8550 or the Fisheries Code of 1998, and RA 8435 or the
Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act of 1997, which mandated government
"to provide priority attention and support to professionalize the practice of fisheries
profession in the Philippines." (JDC)
Discovery of any person in an area where he has no permit or registration papers for
a fishing vessel shall constitute a prima facie presumption that the person and/or
vessel is engaged in unauthorized fishing: Provided, That fishing for daily food
sustenance or for leisure which is not for commercial, occupation or livelihood
purposes may be allowed.
27
It shall be unlawful for any commercial fishing vessel to fish in bays and in such
other fishery management areas which may hereinafter be declared as over-
exploited.
Any commercial fishing boat captain or the three (3) highest officers of the boat who
commit any of the above prohibited acts upon conviction shall be punished by a fine
equivalent to the value of catch or Ten thousand pesos (P10,000.00) whichever is
higher, and imprisonment of six (6) months, confiscation of catch and fishing gears,
and automatic revocation of license.
It shall be unlawful for any person not listed in the registry of municipal fisherfolk to
engage in any commercial fishing activity in municipal waters. Any municipal
fisherfolk who commits such violation shall be punished by confiscation of catch and
a fine of Five hundred pesos (500.00).
The entry of any foreign fishing vessel in Philippine waters shall constitute a prima
facie evidence that the vessel is engaged in fishing in Philippine waters.
Violation of the above shall be punished by a fine of One hundred thousand U.S.
Dollars (US$100,000.00), in addition to the confiscation of its catch, fishing
equipment and fishing vessel: Provided, That the Department is empowered to
impose an administrative fine of not less than Fifty thousand U.S. Dollars
(US$50,000.00) but not more than Two hundred thousand U.S. Dollars
(US$200,000.00) or its equivalent in the Philippine Currency.
It will likewise be unlawful for any person, corporation or entity to possess, deal in,
sell or in any manner dispose of, any fish or fishery species which have been illegally
caught, taken or gathered.
The discovery of dynamite, other explosives and chemical compounds which contain
combustible elements, or noxious or poisonous substances, or equipment or device
for electro-fishing in any fishing vessel or in the possession of any fisherfolk,
28
operator, fishing boat official or fishworker shall constitute prima facie evidence,
that the same was used for fishing in violation of this Code. The discovery in any
fishing vessel of fish caught or killed with the use of explosive, noxious or poisonous
substances or by electricity shall constitute prima facie evidence that the fisherfolk,
operator, boat official or fishworker is fishing with the use thereof.
(4) Dealing in, selling, or in any manner disposing of, for profit, illegally
caught/gathered fisheries species shall be punished by imprisonment ranging from
six (6) months to two (2) years.
(5) In all cases enumerated above, the explosives, noxious or poisonous substances
and/or electrical devices, as well as the fishing vessels, fishing equipment and catch
shall be forfeited.
4. Use of Fine Mesh Net. - It shall be unlawful to engage in fishing using nets with
mesh smaller than that which may be fixed by the Department: Provided, That the
prohibition on the use of fine mesh net shall not apply to the gathering of fry, glass
eels, elvers, tabios, and alamang and such species which by their nature are small but
already mature to be identified in the implementing rules and regulations by the
Department.
Violation of the above shall subject the offender to a fine from Two thousand pesos
(P2,000.00) to Twenty thousand pesos (P20,000.00) or imprisonment from six (6)
months to two (2) years or both such fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the
court: Provided, That if the offense is committed by a commercial fishing vessel, the
boat captain and the master fisherman shall also be subject to the penalties provided
herein: Provided, further, That the owner/operator of the commercial fishing vessel
who violates this provision shall be subjected to the same penalties provided herein:
Provided, finally, That the Department is hereby empowered to impose upon the
offender an administrative fine and/or cancel his permit or license or both.
5. Use of Active Gear in the Municipal Waters and Bays and Other Fishery
Management Areas. - It shall be unlawful to engage in fishing in municipal waters
and in all bays as well as other fishery management areas using active fishing gears
as defined in this Code.
(1) The boat captain and master fisherman of the vessels who participated in the
violation shall suffer the penalty of imprisonment from two (2) years to six (6) years;
29
(2) The owner/operator of the vessel shall be fined from Two thousand pesos
(P2,000.00) to Twenty thousand pesos (20,000.00) upon the discretion of the court.
6. Ban on Coral Exploitation and Exportation. - It shall be unlawful for any person
or corporation to gather, possess, sell or export ordinary precious and semi-precious
corals, whether raw or in processed form, except for scientific or research purposes.
Violations of this provision shall be punished by imprisonment from six (6) months
to two (2) years and a fine from Two thousand pesos (P2,000.00) to Twenty
thousand pesos (20,000.00), or both such fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of
the court, and forfeiture of the subject corals, including the vessel and its proper
disposition.
The confiscated corals shall either be returned to the sea or donated to schools and
museums for educational or scientific purposes or disposed through other means.
7. Ban on Muro-Ami Other Methods and Gear Destructive to Coral Reefs and
Other Marine Habitat. - It shall be unlawful for any person, natural or juridical, to
fish with gear method that destroys coral reefs, seagrass beds, and other fishery
marine life habitat as may be determined by the Department. "Muro-Ami" and any of
its variation, and such similar gear and methods that require diving, other physical
or mechanical acts to pound the coral reefs and other habitat to entrap, gather or
catch fish and other fishery species are also prohibited.
It shall likewise be unlawful for any person or corporation to gather, sell or export
white sand, silica, pebbles and any other substances which make up any marine
habitat.
The person or corporation who violates this provision shall suffer a penalty of two
(2) years to ten (10) years imprisonment and a fine of not less than One hundred
thousand pesos (P100,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos (P500,000.00) or
both such fine and imprisonment, at the discretion of the court. The substance taken
from its marine habitat shall be confiscated.
30
8. Illegal Use of Superlights. - It shall be unlawful to engage in fishing with the use
of superlights in municipal waters or in violation of the rules and regulations which
may be promulgated by the Department on the use of superlights outside municipal
waters.
Violations of this provision shall be punished by imprisonment from six (6) months
to two (2) years or a fine of Five thousand pesos (P5,000.00) per superlight, or both
such fine and imprisonment at the discretion of the courts. The superlight, fishing
gears and vessel shall be confiscated.
10. Fishing in Overfished Area and During Closed Season. - It shall be unlawful to
fish in overfished area and during closed season.
31
local breeding purposes or scientific or research purposes may be allowed subject to
guidelines to be promulgated by the Department.
16. Violation of Catch Ceilings. - It shall be unlawful for any person to fish in
violation of catch ceilings as determined by the Department. Violation of the
provision of this section shall be punished by imprisonment of six (6) months and
one (1) day to six (6) years and/or a fine of Fifty thousand pesos (P50,000.00) and
forfeiture of the catch, and fishing equipment used and revocation of license.
17. Aquatic Pollution. - Aquatic pollution, as defined in this Code shall be unlawful.
B. JURISPRUDENCE
Hizon vs. CA
G.R. No. 119619
December 13, 1996
(b) when fish caught or killed with the use of explosives, obnoxious or poisonous
substances or by electricity are found in a fishing boat.
32
“We cannot overlook the fact that the apprehending officers found in the boat
assorted hooks and lines for catching fish. For this obvious reason, the
Inspection/Apprehension Report prepared by the apprehending officers
immediately after the search did not charge petitioners with illegal fishing, much less
illegal fishing with the use of poison or any obnoxious substance.
The only basis for the charge of fishing with poisonous substance is the result of
the first NBI laboratory test on the four fish specimens. Under the circumstances of
the case, however, this finding does not warrant the infallible conclusion that the
fishes in the F/B Robinson, or even the same four specimens, were caught with the
use of sodium cyanide.”
xxx
“... the report received by the Task Force Bantay Dagat was that a fishing boat was
fishing illegally through muro ami on the waters of San Rafael. Muro ami according
to SPO1 Saballuca is made with the use of a big net with sinkers to make the net
submerge in the water with the fishermen surrounding the net. This method of
fishing needs approximately 200 fishermen to execute. What the apprehending
officers instead discovered were 28 fishermen in their sampans fishing by hook and
line. The authorities found nothing on the boat that would have indicated any form
of illegal fishing.”
Every penalty imposed for the commission of a felony shall carry with it the
forfeiture of the proceeds of the crime and the instruments or tools with which it
was committed.
Such proceeds and instruments or tools shall be confiscated and forfeited in favor of
the Government, unless they be the property of a third person not liable for the
offense, but those articles which are not subject of lawful commerce shall be
destroyed.
“xxx it has been established beyond reasonable doubt that F/V Sea Lion was used by
the 17 Chinese fishermen in the commission of the crimes. On the other hand,
petitioner presented no evidence at all to support its claim of ownership of F/V Sea
Lion. Therefore, the forfeiture of F/V Sea Lion in favor of the government was
proper.”
33
Senson vs. Judge Pangilinan
A.M. No. MTJ-02-1430
September 8, 2003
Alayon and Villarosa, asserting to be co-owners of the MB King Fisher that was used
in the illegal fishing activity, filed an Urgent Motion for Custody of Fishing Net,
alleging that the fishing net which costs P600,000 was left unattended at the beach,
exposed to various elements and movement of the sea. Judge granted said motion
despite the opposition of prosecutor Senson. Judge’s defense was that the fishing net
is not necessary for the prosecution to prove its case as it already has sufficient
evidece at hand.
“Nowhere in the statute would it appear that the seizure of the items, alleged to have
been used in the illegal fishing activity, is proscribed by it. Evidently, the seizure of
the fishing paraphernalia has been made as being an incident to a lawful arrest.”
It shall be unlawful for any person to convert mangroves into fishponds or for any
other purposes.
“What the law prohibits is not only the conversion of the mangrove forest into
fishponds, but its conversion into any other purpose. Indeed, Efren may not have
caused the conversion of the mangrove forest into a fishpond, but his acts of cutting
34
mangrove trees, constructing a dike, installing an outlet (prinsa), and excavating in
the mangrove forest altered the natural structure and form of the mangrove forest.”
“The the issuance of Certificate of Non Coverage from DENR shall not exempt the
grantee from compliance with applicable environmental laws, rules and regulations,
including, the permitting requirements of other government agencies, and (2) only
the granting of fishpond lease agreement pursuant to Sec. 45 of R.A. 8550 could
exempt accused from prosecution of Sec. 94 of the same law."
From rapid industrialization to rising global temperature, the marine life and
resources of the Philippines is at risk of exploitation and destruction which in turn
cause the loss of thousands of livelihood and resettlements of tribal communities
who live near or within bodies of water.
To address such detrimental effects, the government through its agencies task to
protect and preserve these waters must create and establish measures and act on it
immediately. These measurements would be more effective with the cooperation of
the people and organizations that would create networks of information and support
regarding awareness of the matter.
35
poverty and providing supplementary livelihoods among municipal
fisherfolk; improving aquaculture productivity within ecological
limits; making optimal use of offshore and deep sea resources; and
helping upgrade post-harvest technologies (Department of Agriculture
Administrative Order No. 3, series of 1998).
2. Department of Agriculture (DA)
BFAR is a bureau attached to the Department of Agriculture. DA is the
government agency mandated to promote agricultural development
by providing policy framework, public investment and support
services. It should improve farm income and generate work
opportunities for farmers, fisherfolks and other rural workers. It shall
encourage people’s participation through sectoral representation in
agricultural policy making bodies so that the policies, plans, and
programs of the department are responsive to the needs of the sector
(DA, 2017).
3. National Anti-Poverty Commission (NAPC)
The National Anti-Poverty Commission (NAPC) was established based
on Republic Act 8425 or Social Reform and Poverty Alleviation Act of
1997. It serves as coordinating and advisory body for the
implementation of social reform and poverty alleviation agenda. It
coordinates with different national government agencies as well as
local government units to assure full implementation of social reform
and poverty alleviation programs, and advocates for mobilization of
funds for the said programs. The NAPC also recommends policies and
other measure to ensure responsive implementation of commitments
under the Social Reform Agenda (NAPC, 2017).
4. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)
The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) is the
primary agency responsible for the conservation, management,
development, and proper use of the country’s environment and
natural resources, specifically forest and grazing lands, mineral
resources, including those in reservation and watershed areas, and
lands of the public domain, as well as the licensing and regulation of all
natural resources as may be provided for by law to ensure equitable
sharing of the benefits derived there from for the welfare of the
present and future generations (DENR, 2017).
5. Department of Labour and Employment (DOLE)
The Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) is the primary
policy-making, programming, coordinating and administrative
government agency in the field of labor and employment. It assumes
the primary responsibilities of promoting gainful employment
opportunities and optimizing the development and utilization of the
country’s manpower resources; advancing workers’ welfare by
providing for just and humane working conditions and terms of
employment; and maintaining industrial peace by promoting
harmonious, equitable, and stable employment relations that assure
equal protection for the rights of all concerned parties.
36
6. National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP)
The National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) was created
to be the primary agency responsible for the formulation and
implementation of policies, plans, and programs relative to the
Indigenous People’s Rights Act. Its primary mandate is to protect and
promote the interest and wellbeing of the ICCs/IPs with due regard to
their beliefs, customs, and institutions.
NON-GOVERNMENTAL UNITS:
1. GreenPeace
The objective of GreenPeace is to create awareness and support to the
governments drive in protecting the environment from rising threats
caused by pollution, deforestation, climate change and genetic
contamination. This organization creates channels of information to
the people of what may
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS:
1. United Nations (UN)
The UN, in its goal to create and offer basic commodities for a
comfortable and dignified life, they saw the fast deterioration of bodies
of water that cause negative impact to fishermen, especially small
scale fishers that affect their livelihood. The organization also saw the
effect of such deterioration to economic status a country, considering
that the seas and oceans are vital conduits for trade and
transportation.
The organization created various sustainable development plans in
order to create opportunities for fishers, especially the small scale
fishers and also for the continuous protection and conservation of
marine resources and life. This includes, reduction of marine pollution
of all kinds, sustainable management and protection of marine and
coastal ecosystems to avoid significant adverse impacts, including by
strengthening their resilience, and take action for their restoration in
order to achieve healthy and productive ocean, regulation of
harvesting to avoid overfishing and scientific studies that will enhance
the health of water.
2. Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN)
The ASEAN targeted to help small scale fishers by creating livelihood
development in education, health and knowledge to increase and
conserve the marine life.
3. European Union (EU)
The European Union, in its promise to help developing countries,
pledged various aid to countries, especially the South East Asian
countries. This aids include development of coastal waters and
restoration of creeks, rivers and inland bodies of water.
37
XII. NGO AND COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
RARE
Local government leaders are trained to manage their municipal waters more
sustainably by setting up managed access areas around sanctuaries, which give
fishers exclusive rights to fish in the area in exchange for compliance with more
sustainable fishing practices. It is RARE’s flagship program, which started in the
Philippines in 2010 in partnership with 37 local government units (LGUs).
OCEANA
To support the government in its goal to promote national policies that protect the
Philippines’ vast marine resources.
Use the law to ensure that fish and fishers receive the protections they deserve.
Offer technical expertise to aid the government in its goal of establishing sustainable
catch limits, reducing discards and protecting spawning habitat.
To carry out scientific expeditions to educate the public about the importance of
healthy oceans and the role they play in the economy of the Philippines by providing
food and jobs.
GREENPEACE
“Defending our Oceans campaign” sets out to protect and preserve our oceans now
and for the future by setting aside swathes of the global oceans from exploitation
and controllable human pressure, allowing these areas the respite they so
desperately need for recovery and renewal.
In Cebu, a community at the mouth of the Bojo River was plagued by a triad of
destructive fishing methods: dynamite, cyanide and other poisons, and muro-ami.
locals realized they could make money from protecting their picturesque river and
coastline. They formed tour agency, which offers river cruises and other excursions,
has won eco-tourism awards and helps fund community education, mangrove
conservation, guards and law enforcement.
Revenue from ecotourism projects help fund education initiatives in the fishing
village of Bojo.
38
As for the fishers who had used explosives and poisons:
- embraced ecotourism
- work only four- six hours a day
- income is good
- more time with their families
Apo is a small island (78 hectares). 9 kilometers from the coast of Negros in the
Philippine archipelago. 145 households and a resident population of 710 people.
Almost all the men on the island are fishermen.
The Philippine Coast Guard and National Police are responsible for enforcing fishing
regulations. Dr. Angel Alcala (director of the marine laboratory at Silliman University
in Dumaguete City) and Oslob municipality (Cebu) initiated a small marine
sanctuary, the region's first, at uninhabited Sumilon Island (about 50 km from Apo).
After three years of dialogue between Silliman University staff and Apo Island
fishermen, 14 families decided to establish a “no-fishing marine sanctuary” on the
island. All island families decided to support the sanctuary and make it legally
binding through the local municipal government.
Apo Island has served as a model for fishing communities on the adjacent mainlands
of Negros and Cebu. The head of Apo Island's local government visits other fishing
villages to explain the sanctuary, and people from other villages visit Apo to see what
it's all about. The Apo Island , stimulated the Philippine government to establish a
national marine sanctuary program that now has about 700 sanctuaries nationwide
Before the sanctuary: Strategy was to fish a place with destructive methods until it
was no longer worth fishing
Now: The community committed to keeping one place their island’s fishing grounds,
sustainable
39
Before the sanctuary: Expected government agencies responsible for enforcing
fishing regulations to do so and complained when it didn’t happen.
Coastal and marine resources are used extensively by communities while in most
cases their management is mandated to the government through various agencies
dealing with fisheries forests and protected areas, among others. Non governmental
organizations (NGOs), which here can be defined as non-profit organizations which
are independent from government, also have their clear roles to play. NGOs can also
play a very important role in bringing up alternative ideas for natural resource
management that may differ from standard government practice. Innovation.
Alternatives and differing perspectives are all important in effective Fisheries and
Marine Resources Planning and Management.
Tuna is one of the world’s favorite fish, from simple sandwiches to luxury sashimi.
But now it is paying the price for its popularity: Many species of tuna are severely
overfished. All around the world, tuna are in trouble. The global output of tuna has
now reached 6.57 million tons annually.
Most of the tuna sashimi we eat is made from southern bluefin tuna, big eye tuna and
yellowfin. These have been overfished in the Western and Central Pacific Oceans
(WCPO) to an extent that stocks are dwindling to dangerously low levels.
Greenpeace recorded how Mediterranean bluefin had declined by 80%. With the
depletion of Atlantic tuna, the fishing industry then turned to the Pacific Ocean,
where tuna stocks had been – until then – relatively healthy. Currently, more than
half of the world's tuna is now caught in the Pacific Ocean, by fishing fleets from
South Korea, Taiwan, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines. And as a result, bluefin,
yellowfin and bigeye tuna are now in serious trouble in the Western and Central
Pacific Ocean as well.
Bigeye and yellowfin tuna are fully exploited or over exploited in all oceans. The
magnificent bluefin, the most iconic and valuable of all tuna species, is critically
endangered.
In 2011, a single bluefin tuna set an all-time record when it sold for US$396,000 in
Japan.
Japan is responsible for 75 percent of all bluefin catches in the Pacific between 1980
and 2014, is now under pressure to introduce serious measures to stem the decline.
The Pacific Rim countries, including Japan, South Korea, and the US, agreed in 2014
to limit fishing of bluefin. Every country now has a quota. Japan, as the biggest
bluefin consumer, agreed to reduce its catches by half, to a maximum of 4,007 tons
for fish under 30 kilos and 4,882 tons for larger fish. Meanwhile, the International
Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has moved the Pacific bluefin to the
40
“vulnerable” category in its Red List of “threatened” species (the stage before
“endangered”).
Effective July 1, 2018, the Fisheries Agency in Japan is set to tighten rules on coastal
fishing of Pacific bluefin tuna, to recover stocks of the prized fish. The agency
introduced regulations to punish offshore Pacific bluefin tuna fishers if their catches
exceed quotas. Violators face fines of up to ¥2 million or imprisonment for up to
three years. Coastal bluefin tuna fishers will be punished similarly if they break the
new regulations.
The catch quotas will be allocated to the prefectures in accordance with recent
statistics.But as the total catches in the season through next March 2018 will be
limited to only 733 tons, far lower than the annual limit of 3,230 tons for offshore
catches.
Greenpeace is calling for an immediate ban on fishing with purse seine nets and
long-line fishing vessels. We are also calling for establishing four areas in the Pacific
as marine protection zones. The Greenpeace ship “Esperanza” has been sailing the
Pacific as part of our campaign to stop overfishing.
Every Filipino has a role taking care of our oceans and seas. Being an archipelago
and regarded as the astonishing "center of global marine biodiversity," the
Philippines has more than half of its cities and municipalities in coastal areas. These
communities are heavily reliant on the bounty of healthy seas for sustenance and
income.
41
XIII. ISSUES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommendation:
(b) Social development, employment and decent work: Small-scale fishers are
still among the poorest of the poor. There are no social development safety nets to
address the basic social needs of small-scale fishers.
Recommendation:
Technology training courses and appropriation for assets, e.g. the construction
and/or provision of fiberglass boats – which come with sustainable and
environment-friendly gears.
Recommendation:
Create artificial reefs in coastal and freshwater areas. Since reefs damaged by
exploitation would not recover any time soon, man-made reefs can be used as an
alternative to provide shelter for fishes and other marine life.
Research more on developing aquaculture. If done right, fisherfolks would not have
to go far off coast in search to catch fish to sell or bring home to their families. They
can simply take advantage of the natural environment to raise fish they need.
(d) Degraded coastal environment: One of the problems which lead to depletion of
fisheries is unregulated settlement along coasts. Some marginalized fisherfolks tend
to build houses close to the shore, if not on the water itself. The water, as
42
consequence, becomes polluted with waste and litter coming from these households
to the detriment of marine life.
Recommendation:
In addition to moving fisherfolk settlements at a greater distance from the coast, the
local government should conduct regular coastal cleanup to free the coastal waters
of garbage especially those which have settled on the sea floor. It should likewise
come up with a proper waste disposal system to keep sewage waste away from
water as this can result to eutrophication which may consequently lead to a less
diverse marine ecosystem.
(e) Poverty among small scale fishers: Although the country is said to have one of
the richest fishery resources in the world, still fisherfolks are deemed among the
poorest of the poor. One of the main reasons for this paradox is that they are heavily
reliant on fishing to support their daily needs. As a result, it becomes difficult for
them to cope from reduced catch caused by both natural and man-induced factors.
Recommendations:
Support eco-tourism. Many coastal areas around the country are perfect spots for
tourists. If the government would invest in further developing and preserving the
beauty of these areas, as well as training the locals on how to accommodate tourists,
then fisherfolks would not have to be highly dependent on fishing for livelihood.
Forming fishing cooperatives would also be a good idea. Fishermen can pool
resources and collaborate fishing activities to achieve optimal income and at the
same time imposing upon their members policies as to sustainable and responsible
fishing practices.
XIV. CONCLUSION
The value to the economy of the country’s fisheries and aquatic resources calls for
the proper exploitation and judicious conservation thereof. The existing laws have in
them seemingly sufficient clout to prevent abuse of such resources through
registration, licensing and imposition of heavier penalties against violators.
However, the government should also consider a primary concern the livelihood
needs of fisherfolk communities reliant thereon and and ensure continuous and
advanced development and proper implementation of programs therefor on a local
scale.
43
XV. BIBLIOGRAPHY
Review of Selected Philippine Policies and Laws on Fisheries and the Voluntary
Guidelines for Securing Small-scale Fisheries (VGSSF) by Asian NGO Coaliton for
Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ANGOC) and NGOs for Fisheries
Reform, Inc.
http://ree.ph/illegal-fishing/
https://rmportal.net/biodiversityconservation-
gateway/resources/projects/spotlight-on-mission-projects/illegal-
unreported-and-unregulated-iuu
http://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1037899
https://www.edf.org/oceans/reforming-fisheries-philippines
http://oneocean.org/overseas/200901/the_legal_bases_of_coastal_and_fisheries
_resource_management.html
http://www.oceandocs.org/bitstream/handle/1834/8470/ktf00571.pdf?
sequence=1
http://www.greenpeace.org/eastasia/campaigns/oceans/problems/tuna-in-
trouble/
http://www.greenpeace.org/eastasia/magazines/issue01/lobby/
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/06/30/national/japan-tighten-
control-coastal-fishing-pacific-bluefin-
http://www.bwsc.dole.gov.ph/images/W3AP/ra9710_with_irr.pdf
http://ree.ph/illegal-fishing/
https://rmportal.net/biodiversityconservation-
gateway/resources/projects/spotlight-on-mission-projects/illegal-unreported-
and-unregulated-iuu
http://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1037899
https://www.edf.org/oceans/reforming-fisheries-philippines
44
45