Precision Farming through Hi-Tech Horticulture for

Maximizing Horticultural Output

RS Spehia
Department of Soil Science & Water Management
Dr YS Parmar University of Horticulture and Forestry, Nauni-Solan (HP) 173 230

Abstract

“Agriculture is the backbone of the Indian economy and the villages are the
life lines of growth of India.”

For India, farming is a living heritage, which we should protect and preserve.
Agriculture is a very important sector for the sustained growth of the Indian
economy. The success story of the First Green Revolution has run its course.
We cannot afford to rest on our laurels. The fruits of the Green Revolution
and the momentum generated by it, needs to be sustained. Towards this
endeavour, we must analyse the challenges that beset the agricultural scenario.
Some of the structural weaknesses of the agriculture sector are low levels of
public investment, exhaustion of the yield potential of new high yielding
varieties of wheat and rice, unbalanced fertilizer use, low seeds replacement
rate and low yield per unit area across almost all crops. Agricultural growth
has become lackluster, as rain-fed areas still constitute about 65 percent of the
total net sown area. Degradation in land quality and soil health due to
improper nutrient application, shrinkage of per capita availability of land due
to population increase, increase of wasteland and urbanization and the
growing demand for more land are other features plaguing our agricultural
production environment. We are left with a situation where we have to
produce more from the limited land available to ensure food security. But in
154
doing so, we must always keep in mind that any food production and
consumption policy must safeguard that the integrity of natural eco-systems is
not compromised. Agriculture has to remain centre-stage in our nation’s
economic thinking, making it attractive and rewarding. Keeping all these in
mind, basic precision farming techniques including components of hi-tech
horticulture like pond lining, in-situ moisture conservation, micro irrigation,
protected cultivation can be used for mitigating the above stated facts and
keeping agriculture a beneficial prospect. This paper presents focused details
of the hi-tech interventions that can be used for precision farming by rural
youths at village level for enhancing the production, productivity and quality
of horticultural/agricultural produce.

Introduction

In an era of open economy after WTO, it has become increasingly necessary

that our produce is competitive, both in the domestic as well as international
markets. This demands infusion of technology for an efficient utilization of
resources for deriving higher output per unit of inputs with excellent quality of
produce. This would be possible only through deployment of precision
farming and hi-tech applications.

Precision farming involves the application of technologies and

principles to manage spatial and temporal variability associated with all
aspects of horticultural production for improving crop performance and
environment quality. Precision farming calls for an efficient management of
resources through location specific hi-tech interventions. Whereas, hi-tech
horticulture is the deployment of modern technology which is capital
intensive, less environment dependent, having capacity to improve the

155
productivity and quality of produce. Hi-tech horticulture encompasses a
variety of interventions such as micro irrigation, fertigation, protected
cultivation, mulching for in-situ moisture conservation, micro propagation,
soil less culture etc. Utilization of these interventions orchestrated together
having the aim of achieving higher output in given time period leads to
precision faming, which is largely knowledge driven.

Precision farming aims to improve crop performance and environment

quality. Precision farming is one of the most scientific and modern approaches
to sustainable agriculture that has gained momentum in 21st Century. Thus,
the precision farming includes:

Variations occur in crop or soil properties within a field

These variations are noted and often mapped
Management actions are taken as a consequence of the spatial
variability within a field
Developments which prompted PF

Many technological developments, which occurred in 20th century

contributed to the development of the concept of PF were Global Navigation
Satellite Systems (GNSS), GPS guided agricultural machinery, geographical
information system and remote sensing.

Constraints in adoption of PF
PF, though in many cases is a proven technology, but still is restricted
to developed countries. The reasons for limited implementation of PF in Asian
countries are following:

Small land holdings

Cost/benefit aspect of PF
156
 Heterogeneity of cropping system
Lack of local technical expertise
Knowledge and technological gaps

Economics feasibility of Precision Farming in India on agriculture

condition
 Precision farming is a system, not a single piece of equipment or
technology. A GPS by itself has little value to farmer. However, when
combined with a yield monitor or a variable rate technology (VRT), it
may have value.
 Returns may be positive if costs can be spread over many applications.
Specialized equipment, which has limited uses, has greater risks
associated with it than equipment that has many uses. A multi-use
tractor will likely pay for itself sooner than a new, single-use machine.
 Precision farming may not return on low-valued commodities as it
does on high-valued specialty crops i.e. high revenue for vegetables
than the wheat and paddy
Out of these, the major problems for implementing PF in Indian scenario are
small holdings and higher investments.

Farmers in northern and north-eastern states are still practicing the

conventional methods of crop production in which the fertility of the land
decreases thereby increases water consumption with low productivity
resulting into lower quality of produce. To meet the above challenges, there is
need to adopt precision farming techniques with plasticulture applications in
agriculture.

157
Hi-tech Interventions for Precision Farming are:

1. Water harvesting tank lined with PE films for supplementary irrigation as

well as in domestic needs.
2. Greenhouse cultivation for off-season crops
3. Use of shade house for plant propagation and production
4. Low tunnel for raising early nursery
5. Plastic mulching
6. Soil solarization with transparent films for controlling weeds and soil
diseases
7. Micro irrigation systems (drip/sprinkler) for efficient water management
8. High Density PE/PVC pipes for water distribution network
9. Nursery management using Plastic trays or pro-trays and plug trays used for
raising seedlings
10. Plant protection nets - Anti hail nets, Insect nets, bird protection nets.
11. Innovative packaging solution: Plastic Crates, boxes and leno bags as
packaging materials for post harvest management
12. Plastic based fish culture i.e. portable tanks, hatchery units etc. for income
generating activities.
Keeping in view the importance of protected cultivation and
micro irrigation, State Government of Himachal Pradesh has launched an
ambitious Pt. Deen Dayal Kisan-Bagwaan Samridhi Yojana for upliftment of
farmers through plasticulture applications like protected cultivation and micro
irrigation wherein the farmers are getting subsidy to the amount of 80% of the
cost. In addition, Horticulture Technology Mission is being operated under
Department of Horticulture wherein subsidy of 50% on almost all the above
mentioned applications is being given. Out of the above mentioned
applications, few important applications are being discussed hereunder:
158
I. Lining of canals/farm ponds/water reservoirs water:
The rain-fed farming situation in the hills, where water storage is a
major constraint, its assured availability may help to increase the production
exponentially. This leads not only to the conservation of water but efficient
distribution in field. The cost of developing water resources in hills is very
high, thus storage and application losses should be minimized to utilize scarce
water efficiently. Topographical conditions of hills can provide excellent
opportunity to store water and distribute through gravity fed irrigation
systems. The water application methods such as drip irrigation help in
efficient distribution of water to the plant. Different type of plastic mulches
reduces water losses from the soil profile leading to saving of water and
controls weed thereby the farm labour cost.
In India, as perennial rivers are not present in every state to meet the
demands of agriculture, water is carried in canals over thousands of kilometers
from one state to another. During the process, lot of water is lost through
leaks, seepage, evaporation etc. To reduce these losses, canals are being lined
with polyethylene film (PE film) of 250-500 micron thickness.
This can reduce the losses due to seepage by upto 50%After water has reached
to farmers fields, it should be stored in farm ponds/water reservoirs lined with
PE film to reduce the loss through seepage and leaks which may occur in RCC
tanks/kachha tanks. Lining of ponds can reduce the cost of water storage 4-5
times than RCC tanks. Pitching of film with bricks or round stones can help
increase the life of film to many years.
II. Efficient Irrigation Methods

Due to natural and man-made causes over the years, water availability
is varied in different parts of the world. In India, North India and some parts
of south India are categorized under physical water scarcity i.e. More than
159
75% of the river flows are allocated to agriculture, industries or domestic
purpose. This definition of water scarcity- relating water availability to water
demand-implies that dry areas are not necessarily water scarce (FAO, Rome).

The importance of water for agricultural productivity hardly needs any

emphasis in agrarian economy like India. From 1951 to1997, gross irrigated
area expanded fourfold from 23 million hectares to 90 million hectares and
irrigation continues to be single largest use of fresh water in India. According
to a survey, Punjab uses 75-80% more water than is being recharged, Haryana
and Rajasthan uses 50-60% more, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu uses 35-40%
and Gujarat uses 20% more than recharge, and the average use of country
comes out to be around 15% more than it is being recharged (anonymous,
2007). Water is lost mainly through conveyance, evaporation and run-off.
With increasing competition, conflicts, shortages, waste, overuse and
degradation of water resources, the agricultural water share is likely to
decrease in the future. The conventional system of irrigation employing
different methods like flooding, furrow, basin and border irrigation revolve
around the concept of replenishing the moisture level to field capacity only
after depletion by 50-60% of field capacity. These surface methods of
irrigation have several disadvantages as listed below.

Disadvantages of surface irrigation methods

1) Loss of water through deep percolation

2) Loss of nutrients through leaching beyond root zone
3) Ground water pollution through leaching of agrochemicals beyond root
zone and surface water pollution through runoff water.
4) Stalinization/alkalization of soil.

160
5) Plant suffers from water stress due to both water scarcity and water
logging.
6) Plant nutrient uptake may not be optimum due to unfavorable soil water
regime in the root zone.
7) Plant is more susceptible to soil borne diseases.
8) More Insect pest attack.
9) Labour intensive.
The comparative irrigation efficiencies under different methods of irrigation is
given in the following Table 1
Table 1 Irrigation Efficiencies under Different Methods of Irrigation
(Percent)

Irrigation Efficiencies Methods of Irrigation

Surface Sprinkler Drip

Conveyance efficiency 40-50 (canal) 100 100

60-70 (well)
Application efficiency 60-70 70-80 90
Surface water moisture 30-40 30-40 20-25
evaporation
Overall efficiency 30-35 50-60 80-90

Source: Sivanappan, R. K. (1998)

If we could convert sizeable part of irrigated areas into modern irrigation

systems, considerably more area can be brought under irrigation along with
increasing the land and water productivities.

161
 Table2. Comparative Performance of Conventional irrigation with
Microirrigation

Conventional Irrigation
Performance Micro irrigation
methods
Indicator
Water saving Waste lot of water. Losses 40-70% of water can be saved
occur due to percolation, runoff over conventional irrigation
and evaporation methods. Runoff and deep
percolation losses are nil or
negligible.
Water use 30-50%, because losses are 80-95%
efficiency very high
Saving in Labour engaged per irrigation Labour required only for operation
labour is higher than drip and periodic maintenance of the
system
Weed Weed infestation is very high Less wetting of soil, weed
infestation infestation is very less or almost
nil.
Use of saline Concentration of salts increases Frequent irrigation keeps the salt
water and adversely affects the plant concentration within root zone
growth. Saline water cannot be below harmful level
used for irrigation
Diseases and High Relatively less because of less
pest problems atmospheric humidity
Suitability in Deep percolation is more in Suitable for all soil types as flow
different soil light soil and with limited soil rate can be controlled
Type depths. Runoff loss is more in
heavy soils
Water control Inadequate Very precise and easy
Efficiency of Efficiency is low because of Very high due to reduced loss of
fertilizer use heavy losses due to leaching nutrients through leaching and
and runoff runoff water
Soil erosion Soil erosion is high because of Partial wetting of soil surface and
large stream sizes used for slow application rates eliminate
irrigation. any possibility of soil erosion
Increase in Non-uniformity in available Frequent watering eliminates
crop yield moisture reducing the crop moisture stress and yield can be
yield increased up to 15-150% as
compared to conventional
methods of irrigation
Source: Sivanappan, R.K. 1994. and Narayanamoorthy, A. (1997.

162
On the other hand we need to produce more to feed the ever-increasing
population. •This means, two things:
(a) Water productivity in irrigated agriculture should
increase i.e. more crop per drop; and
(b) Agricultural production in traditional rainfed areas
should increase
Increasing Agricultural production in rain fed areas is still a major concern as
climate shift is a serious issue that can affect the production. On the other
hand, water productivity can be increased with the concept of precision
farming broadly which includes taking maximum out of applied inputs.

II.a. Micro Irrigation

Large amount of Water is lost through evaporation and run-off when
irrigation is given through flood or surface irrigation. As farmers get their turn
to irrigate the field after 10-15 days, they tend to completely fill their fields
with water, completely unaware of the fact that the major quantity of water
will be lost through evaporation, run-off and percolation before the plant takes
it up. Considering all these factors, micro irrigation (drip and sprinkler
irrigation) can be helpful in reducing the losses and other benefits.

Sprinkler irrigation
In the sprinkler method of irrigation, water is sprayed into the air and
allowed to fall on the ground surface somewhat resembling rainfall. The spray
is developed by the flow of water under pressure through small orifices or
nozzles. The pressure is usually obtained by pumping. With careful selection
of nozzle sizes, operating pressure and sprinkler spacing the amount of

163
irrigation water required to refill the crop root zone can be applied nearly
uniform at the rate to suit the infiltration rate of soil.
Advantages of sprinkler irrigation

- Elimination of the channels for conveyance, therefore no conveyance loss

- Suitable to all types of soil except heavy clay

- Suitable for irrigating crops where the plant population per unit area is
very high. It is most suitable for oil seeds and other cereal and
vegetable crops
- Water saving
- Closer control of water application convenient for giving light and frequent
irrigation and higher water application efficiency
- Increase in yield
- Mobility of system
-May also be used for undulating area
- Saves land as no bunds etc. are required
- Influences greater conducive micro-climate
- Areas located at a higher elevation than the source can be irrigated
- Possibility of using soluble fertilizers and chemicals
- Less problem of clogging of sprinkler nozzles due to sediment laden water
The basic objective of sprinkler irrigation is to simulate rainfall and to
apply uniformly a calculated depth of water at a predetermined application
rate. The irrigation efficiency of sprinklers will depend upon the degree of
uniformity of water application. The water spray distribution characteristics of
sprinklers and their spacing will regulate the uniformity of water application.
The spray distribution characteristics of sprinkler heads are typical and change
with nozzle size and operating pressure. With lower pressures, the drops are

164
larger and the water from the nozzle falls in a ring away from the sprinkler.
With higher pressures, the water from the nozzle breaks up into very fine drops
and fall very near the sprinkler. Wind also distorts the application pattern. The
higher is the wind velocity, greater is the distortion and this factor should be
considered when selecting the sprinkler spacing under windy conditions. In
this distribution pattern, the depth of water applied, surrounding the sprinkler,
decreases as the distance from the sprinkler increases. The absorption of water in
the soil is also in the same pattern because the rate of water application at any
point under the sprinkler coverage is lower than the infiltration rate of the soil.
A lot of work has been done in different parts of India showing
response of crops to sprinkler irrigation in water saving and yield increase
over conventional method of irrigation (Table 3 ).
Table3. Response of different crops to sprinkler irrigation
Crops Water Saving, % Yield increase, %
Bajra 56 19
Barley 56 16
Bhindi 28 23
Cabbage 40 3
Cauliflower 35 12
Chillies 33 24
Cotton 36 50
Cowpea 19 3
Fenugreek 29 35
Garlic 28 6
Gram 69 57
Groundnut 20 40
Jowar 55 34
Lucerne 16 27
Maize 41 36
Onion 33 23
Potato 46 4
Sunflower 33 20
Wheat 35 24

165
Just like any other system, sprinkler has certain Limitations also which are
mentioned below:
•Requires high operation expenses due to the energy needed for pumping,
labour and relatively large investment in equipment: sprinklers and pipes.
•Sensitivity to wind, causing evaporation losses.
•The unavoidable wetting of foliage in field crops results in increased
sensitivity to diseases.
• Clean water is necessary in order to prevent clogging of the sprinkler
nozzles.
• Some 20 % additional water is needed in order to guarantee the net dosage
for the entire field.

Drip Irrigation System

Drip irrigation is frequent application of water directly on or below the
soil surface near the root zone of plants. It delivers required and measured
quantity of water in relatively small amounts slowly to the individual or
groups of plants. Water is applied as continuous drops, tiny streams, or fine
spray through emitters placed along a low-pressure delivery system. Such
system provides water precisely to plant root zones and maintains ideal
moisture conditions for plant growths. The main advantages of drip irrigation
systems are:
•Greater adaptability than sprinklers to irrigation doses and rates;
•Prevention of evaporation losses, resulting in more precise control over the
moisture depth and thus more efficient utilization of the available water.
•Avoiding wetting the foliage reduces the incidence of diseases/pests.
•Wind has no effect, meaning irrigation is possible at all hours of day or night.
Requires less energy than sprinklers.

166
• There is no dependence on the topography of the area.
•Facilitates application of fertilizers and pesticides, etc. to the soil via
irrigation.
•Irrigation possible over long periods without ongoing labour inputs.
•Suitable for all types of crops at all stages of growth.
The available literature and the results obtained at Precision Farming
Development Centres across India report that there is 50 to 70% saving in
irrigation water and 18 to 152 % increase in yield of fruits and vegetable crops
through drip irrigation (Table 4).

Table 4. Extent of Water Saving and Increase in Yield with Drip

Irrigation System
Crops Water saving (%) Increase in yield (%)
Sugarcane 50 99
Tomato 42 60
Watermelon 66 19
Cucumber 56 45
Chili 68 28
Cauliflower 68 70
Okra 37 33
Ground nut 40 152
Mulberry 22 23
Banana 45 52
Grapes 48 23
Sweet lime 61 50
Pomegranate 45 45
Source: INCID 1994 and NCPAH, 2001
Though, drip irrigation system is most effective and productive system of
irrigation, still it some limitations like:
•Dripper systems are relatively expensive and require a certain level of
professionalism to operate and supervise them.
167
•Drippers are highly susceptible to clogging and therefore require protective
filtration, which is expensive, in terms of cash outlay, maintenance and
energy.
•Dripper systems are not very mobile and are therefore more expensive as
they are generally stationary for a given crop.
•The pipes in the system are highly susceptible to puncturing by farm
machinery.
III. In-situ Moisture Conservation through polythylene Mulch
In situ conservation of water means stopping it from being wasted and
conserving at the place where it is received to produce the maximum benefit
or collection and storage of rain water where it is received (catch where it
falls). In –situ moisture conservation is needed because:
•Quantity of water available from different sources such as surface water and
ground water is insufficient even for drinking purposes
•Difficulty in tapping water from river, spring etc and high cost in carrying the
water to the desired site/field
•High cost of installation and maintenance of irrigation schemes
•To increase the effectiveness of various farm inputs
•To enhance the productivity in rainfed agriculture on sustainable basis
•Under such circumstances, it has become imperative to conserve and use all
available water resources effectively and efficiently on sustainable basis
As after irrigation, water is lost mainly through evaporation, in-situ
moisture conservation through plastic mulch is very effective in :
•Increased soil temperature during winters
•Reduced soil compaction
•Reduced fertilizer leaching
•Reduced evaporation loss

168
•Increased water-use efficiency
•Cleaner product
•Reduced weed problems
•Earlier crops and Increased growth
Different polyethylene mulches like black, coloured and transparent
polyethylene film are used depending upon the need. Like for mulching only
black coloured polyethylene mulch (100 micron thickness for fruit crops, 25-
50 micron for flowers and vegetables) is used; when the colour and other
qualities are to be increased, different colours of film can be tried. For soil
solarization, transparent polyethylene film is used. In Precision Farming
Development Centre, Solan lot of work has been done in plastic mulching
alone (Table 5) and in conjunction with drip irrigation (Table 6).
Table 5. Effect of mulching on per cent increase on yield
Sr. No Crop Increase in yield (%)
1. Plum 18.00
2. Strawberry 55.00
3. Capsicum 13.00
4. Cabbage 13.60
5. French bean 18.61
6. Broccoli 19.76

Table 6. Effect of mulch+ drip irrigation on increase in yield and per cent
water saving
S. No. Crop Increase in yield (%) Water saving (%)
1. Pea 25.80 32.25
2. Tomato 44.5 118.80
3. Peach 36.20 30.00
4. Apricot 43.30 54.00
5. Plum 33.9 58.8

169
6. Strawberry 66.74 54.20
Plastic mulching helps in reducing the soil erosion considerably as it stops the
splashing effect of rain as well as the run-off effect that occurs after torrential
rains. It is also best for stopping the soil erosion and run-offs on the slopes
(Table 7).

Table 7. Effect of different conservation practices on run-off, soil loss and

yield of broccoli

Treatments Run-off (mm) Soil loss (t/ha) Yield (q/ha)

Conservation tillage 158.3 7.32 187.1
Conventional tillage 193.7 8.19 180.7
(CT)
CT+Black plastic 56.6 0.54 216.5
mulch
CT+Bi-coloured 56.6 0.54 213
mulch
CT+Grass mulch 59.4 0.57 209
Source: Spehia et al, 2008

IV. PROTECTED CULTIVATION

Protected cultivation is one more such plasticulture application,
wherein crops are grown in polyhouse/poly tunnels/shade net house etc. and
the soil is protected from erosion as well as water is used in minimal quantity
and judiciously. Protected cultivation helps in producing good quality crops
all through the year without having any negative effects of the weather on the
crop. The yields are increased many fold and the farmer gets good
remunerative.

The farmers are growing vegetables and flowers. In Himachal Pradesh,

flowers and vegetables, especially, carnation and coloured capsicum are being
170
produced at large scale having good quality. In hot areas, polyhouses are used
for production of vegetables and flowers all the year round and farmers are
producing 15-20 times more than in open field conditions. In cold areas,
polyhouses are used to produce vegetables during winters when it is almost
impossible to produce anything out in the open where, underground
polyhouses/trench polyhouses are preferred during winters.
All these plasticulture applications are highly beneficial in increasing the soil
and water conservation as well as other benefits like increased production,
quality crops, fertilizer saving, cost cuttings of inputs etc. and thereby
increasing the economic prospects of the farmers. Moreover, all the above
mentioned plasticulture applications are available in subsidized rates all
through India through respective horticulture/agriculture/other related
departments in each state. The subsidy varies from state to state in addition to
the subsidy given by the center government
The Precision Farming Development Centre of the Department of Soil
Science and Water Management, Dr Y S Parmar University of Horticulture
and Forestry, Nauni, Solan, has been working on these applications and made
recommendations which are highly beneficial to the farmers and officers
implementing these schemes.

References:

Anonymous.1994. Drip irrigation in India, INCID, New Delhi.

Anonymous, 1998. INCID report, New Delhi.
Anonymous. 2001. Progress Report, Ministry of Agriculture Govt. of India,
NCPAH, New Delhi.
Anonymous, 2007. FAO, Rome.
Anonymous, 2007. Indian express, 25th April, 2007.

171
Narayanamoorthy, A. (1997). Drip Irrigation-A viable option for future
irrigation development. Productivity, .38 (3)
Sivanappan, R. K. (1998) Status, scope and future prospects of
microirrigation in India. Proc. Workshop on microirrigation and
sprinkler irrigation system. CBIP New Delhi, April 28-30, 1998: 1-7
Sivanappan, R.K. 1994. Prospects of Microirrigation in India. Irrigation and
DrainageSystems. 8: 49-58.
Spehia, R S., Thakur, B C and J N Raina. 2008. Effect of In-situ conservation
practices on soil loss, moisture carry over and yield of broccoli under
rainfed conditions of mid hill zone of Himachal Pradesh. Asian J. Soil
Sci. Vol.2 No.2:100-103

172