Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
April 2012
Please Contact adr@executiveboard.com with additional questions or comments
Please note that the CEB program names referenced in this document have changed since the time of publication.
Executive Summary
The Audit Director Roundtable receives a number of questions on ACL. To support member
inquiries, ADR collected user feedback on the tool. Respondent experiences and observations are
summarized below.
o All participants appreciate the ACL tool overall and commented on its analytic power. The most
common implementation hurdles are a lack of team and management buy in, gaining access to
desired data, and using the tool to its full potential.
o Effective ACL training methods include in-person and 1:1 training followed by actual usage. ACL
also provides effective training. User guides and online training have proven less successful.
o Some respondents encourage full Audit team usage of the tool while others rely on data analysis
experts within the Audit team. These experts pull data for the rest of the team as needed or help
others use the tool on a one-off basis.
o Respondents report using ACL to better understand business processes, continuously evaluate and
assess risk, provide data for every Internal Audit review, and support the audit plan. Common testing
areas include FCPA, Fraud, Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, Journal Entries, Payroll, Sales
Incentives, Balance Sheet, and Travel Expenses.
o In comparison to other vendors such as Excel, IDEA, SAS, Brio, and Focus, ACL is considered to
be more cost effective when it comes to ease of use and power. A couple respondents mention that
Excel continues to increase its functionality but at this point ACL can still handle a much larger
volume of data.
o Several survey participants mention that ACL demonstrates a clear ROI by helping to uncover
potential fraud, providing in-depth reporting to management, and identifying duplicate payments. One
individual identified $300,000 in duplicate vendor payments through use of ACL.
What approach did you take to • The application requires training. It is not that user
start using ACL? friendly (drag and drop, auto-relate tables..) for
auditors without IT skills.
What approach did you take to start • I took ACL training on data analytics presented by ACL.
using ACL?
• Yes. We still don’t have ACL fully implemented in IA. I am the only person using
Did you run into any hurdles ACL. We have contractors who work on contract audits who use ACL. If I am
implementing ACL in your audit stuck I try to get their help. We do not use ACL on continuous basis as there are
approach? not many audits planned that would require ACL. You forget the use of ACL
functionalities if it is not used all the time
What types of processes/tests do you • Use basic tests in visa and FCPA audits. Use trending, key word search and
use ACL for? other functions like classify and summarize the data.
What do you think can be the major • Continuous monitoring/auditing would be beneficial to
outputs of ACL from the Internal Audit
perspective? IA.
Overall, what do you consider the • ACL is a good tool but no comment on comparing
advantages and the disadvantages of with other tools. This is due to limited knowledge in
ACL as compared to other tools? the comparison space.
•Advantages are that the tool allows you to perform tests that you
Overall, what do you could not perform with many other tools in the market. The
consider the advantages and desktop version is relatively inexpensive. The technical support
the disadvantages of ACL as department is exceptional.
compared to other tools? •Disadvantages are that the tool takes training in order to use
effectively.
Please note that the CEB program names
referenced in this document have changed
since the time of publication.
8
© 2012 The Corporate Executive Board Company. All Rights Reserved.
Company D – Manufacturing
• In my 11 years with the company we have went through some training provided by ACL.
What approach did you take to start Training was a basic introduction. Most staff learn ACL simply by using it. Once folks use
using ACL? it they seem to like the powerful nature of it and want to use it again. The tough part is
getting access to the data and understanding the data we receive.
Did you run into any hurdles • We do not use the new ACL Exchange - only the stand alone (server) edition. So the
only hurdle is getting data to plug into ACL and analyze. I understand folks who
implementing ACL in your audit upgraded to Exchange have some troubles at first getting ACL to recognize their servers
approach? and databases.
• With increasing functions available in Excel a lot of what we do can be done in Excel
What types of processes/tests do you now. ACL can age quite easily, do binford number analysis in one click, and also extra
data that meet certain criteria. Some folks on our staff use it for more advanced things
use ACL for? like healthcare claims auditing or fraud. Most folks use it for data extraction from large
files and simple things like binford, aging, and classifying.
• Ability to audit the entire population, look for trends and abnormalities
What do you think can be the major of entire data sets and you can physically choose the sample items
outputs of ACL from the Internal Audit instead of asking for certain items in a file. Classify, Extract
perspective? commands.
Overall, what do you consider the • Advantages above. Disadvantages are unknown since I am not
advantages and the disadvantages of familiar using other software - however, the biggest issue for us is
ACL as compared to other tools? getting the data.
Did you run into any hurdles • Minimal. Certain organizations are more difficult to
implementing ACL in your audit get data from, and some of our auditors are more
approach? adept at the software.
• Edit
What • Filtering
• Defining new, computed fields
functionalities of • Data
ACL do you • Extraction and exportation
• Joining and merging tables
use? Does your • Sorting
• Analyze
company find • Count records
• Total fields
value in the added • Run statistical analysis on fields
• Stratify and classify on fields
functionalities like • Summarize
• Perform Benford Analysis
Direct Link? • Look for gaps and duplicates
• It can take a special kind of auditor to take ACL and make it effective
Any other considerations/ info you and efficient. Someone who likes to dive into the data, wade around in
would like to share? it, and then see what is really there. Not everyone likes to do that, but
when someone does, it’s a powerful tool.
Please note that the CEB program names
referenced in this document have changed
since the time of publication.
13
© 2012 The Corporate Executive Board Company. All Rights Reserved.
Company F – Government
How long has your company used
ACL? • 4 years.
Did you run into any hurdles • A major hurdle is having the auditors understand that data analysis can
implementing ACL in your audit change the way they do audits – from risk assessments, to conducting
approach? the audit, to reporting and follow-up.
Do you feel ACL has • ACL has improved the internal audit function in the planning, conduct, reporting
added value to your ,and follow-up of every audit (not just financial audits). It is more powerful than
Excel – having audit specific commands, numerous functions to perform specific
company & if so, tasks. It has a logging feature that supports supervisory review; can not alter or
damage the source data; is easy to use; and has a simple but powerful scripting
describe how ACL adds language. In addition, it reads mainframe EBCDIC and PC ASCII data with
conversion and can read data in a wide variety of formats (Excel, Access,
more value than Excel or reports, PDF, etc).
another tool?
Overall, what do you • ACL is easy to use. It does not require auditors to learn programming
consider the advantages languages like visual basic to take advantage of the power of its
scripting language. It is low cost to start (standalone) but offers a
and the disadvantages of solution that allows the user to expand if necessary (Audit Exchange,
ACL as compared to etc). ACL offers excellent training and user support as well as
consulting services.
other tools?
Any other • Any audit function not using data analysis is quite simply not as efficient
considerations/ info you or effective as they should be. ACL allows you to take audit to the next
level where audit can provide significant value to senior management.
would like to share?
Please note that the CEB program names
referenced in this document have changed
since the time of publication.
16
© 2012 The Corporate Executive Board Company. All Rights Reserved.
Company G – Leisure
How long has your company • For the last 1.5 years. Our company used it several years before, then there
was a gap of a few years where the company used IDEA, and then switched
used ACL? back to ACL.
• The department established a data analytics team, which was using IDEA at the
What approach did you take to time. As part of our long-term planning we analyzed the pros/cons of the
software packages to see which best aligned with our long term data analytics
start using ACL? plan and ACL came out on top.
• Yes – some were technology hurdles which were not terribly difficult, such as
data access (e.g. – we installed the ACL Direct Link product for our SAP
Did you run into any hurdles environment). On the other hand, some of our other data access challenges
implementing ACL in your audit are more significant once we move outside of the SAP environment. The
approach? bigger challenge is probably changing our thinking from traditional audits and
audit approaches. Another challenge has been integrating reporting from ACL
work into our audit reporting.
What functionalities of ACL do • Aside from desktop, we rely heavily on Direct Link. We have just
you use? Does your company implemented AX Core and will be deploying analytics to that
platform this year. We did not purchase any other add-ons with
find value in the added AX, such as exception management. Within desktop, we use
functionalities like Direct Link? most of the built-in functionality including a lot of scripting.
• Yes, primarily with IDEA, which we were already using. There are a
few other players, but for our needs and budget, those were the
primary contenders. IDEA is a strong piece of software with good
scripting functionality, however ACL won out primarily due to:
• Some of the outputs are similar, in that some of our data analytics work results in audit
reports, albeit on a different scope than our other audits. The primary benefit is obviously
What do you think can be the that we can test a wide range of data versus one entity at a time with the traditional model.
We’re still trying to define what the outputs from our analytics work should be, but I think
major outputs of ACL from the they could include dashboards and exceptions from continuous audit activities. It is also
Internal Audit perspective? very useful when performing many types of investigations and fraud work. Another
“output” is new processes that we can deploy to help our audit team get more coverage,
target their testing, and be more efficient.
• Text from above covers most of the advantages vs. comparable tools. There are
obviously other tools that have more features and are more robust (e.g. – SAS), however
Overall, what do you consider when you look at the capabilities of the product and what we are using it for, I believe it is
the advantages and the the best option, considering cost and complexity. I think the biggest area for improvement
in the product is in reporting, where it’s extremely lacking. If it had tighter integration with
disadvantages of ACL as Excel through scripting, or had dashboard capabilities similar to a product like Tableau, it
compared to other tools? would be a HUGE plus. I also think they could stand to integrate more built-in features,
like automatic fuzzy-matching and other statistical analyses. I think that’s a big hole in the
product as well.
Did you run into any hurdles • Yes, building confidence within the business that ACL was a tool that
they could benefit from was a big hurdle. We needed well structured
implementing ACL in your audit practical examples to show why ACL would provide functionality that
approach? could not be done in Excel.
What do you think can be the • Savings to the business. Enabling the business to recover lost money has given
major outputs of ACL from the great visibility of ACL within the company, and that can be easily achieved with
Internal Audit perspective? very simple tests like “Duplicates on payments”.
Do you feel ACL has added • Definitely adds value to the company. The stakeholders are usually surprised on
value to your company & if so, how quickly we can produce meaningful information, even using data from
describe how ACL adds more completely different sources. To demonstrate its advantage over Excel, for
example, we show how ACL can deal with millions of records and perform
value than Excel or another repeated tasks a lot simpler and safer that writing macros.
tool?
Overall, what do you consider • Advantages: powerful embedded analytics, unlimited records, easy access to
the advantages and the SAP, trail of commands (log), read-only, flexibility with the import/export.
• Disadvantages: DirectLink doesn’t have standard reports (only access tables),
disadvantages of ACL as lack commands to use the views better (like transferring views from one table to
compared to other tools? other)… I’m a big fan of ACL, so can’t think of many disadvantages.
Please note that the CEB program names
referenced in this document have changed
since the time of publication.
21
© 2012 The Corporate Executive Board Company. All Rights Reserved.
Company I – Aerospace & Defense
Did you run into any hurdles implementing • Lack of users knowledge of systems, data and
ACL in your audit approach?
desire to change approaches.
• The outputs are only limited to knowledge, time and desire, it's just a
tool. Populations, samples and exceptions/discrepancies. Things like
What do you think can be the major data analyses, comparisons between master and transaction data,
statistical information from transactions, potential transactions to follow-
outputs of ACL from the Internal Audit up for detailed fraud testing, duplicate payments,
perspective? accounts/badges/computers or other company assets assigned to
terminated users, etc.
• The real challenge for auditors is how well they identify risks,
understand the relevant processes where the controls reside,
and can they translate those process to the table/field level data
Any other considerations/ info you required to do any significant analysis or CAAT. It's not a tool
would like to share? question, it's a skill set and network (I.e. network within their IT
organization) question.
Please note that the CEB program names
referenced in this document have changed
since the time of publication.
23
© 2012 The Corporate Executive Board Company. All Rights Reserved.
Company J – Financial Services
What approach did you take to start using •Informal, ad hoc approach taken to data analytics. Compared
ACL? audit analytic tools available and selected ACL as tool of choice.
•ACL is used to support the annual audit plan and undertake data
What types of processes/tests do you use analysis to test controls. Continuous auditing is currently in place
ACL for? for vendor duplicates, expense analysis, travel analysis, general
ledger user access and investment monitoring.
•Up until recently we were an ACL desktop shop only and made
What functionalities of ACL do you use? use of standard pre-built functionality and ability to script
Does your company find value in the added
functionalities like Direct Link? continuous routines. Currently implementing AX3 Core and
Exception to leverage benefits from the server solution.
Please note that the CEB program names
referenced in this document have changed
since the time of publication.
24
© 2012 The Corporate Executive Board Company. All Rights Reserved.
Company J – Financial Services:
Continued
Did you compare ACL with other data
analytic software (which ones?) & do you
consider that ACL is the best tool for the • Yes, IDEA was compared and ACL selected.
intended functionalities?
Does your company have a dedicated team • There is a dedicated data analytics team (2FTE) that provide subject matter
of auditors using ACL to analyze data on a expertise, deliver continuous auditing solutions and drive the strategy. We
continuous basis or is ACL been used have also rolled out ACL training to a large percentage of the senior auditor
by all your auditors to analyze data each population to try and ensure that data analytics (and use of ACL) is an
time they perform an audit? available skill set to utilize in support of the audit plan.
Do you feel ACL has added value to your • Yes it does add value. It provides value through ability to run complex queries
company & if so, describe how ACL adds easily through the standard menu options, creates a log to provide audit trail of
more value than Excel or another tool? activity and scripting allows for repeatable tests to be created.
Any other considerations/ info you would • Support has always been excellent (both ACL directly and UK channel
like to share? partners).
What approach did you take to • Provided software to staff and an introductory onsite training by ACL - folks were then
encouraged to use ACL in their projects and this accounted for 5% of their annual
start using ACL? performance objectives.
• Our department still does not have a large volume of users. In the last couple of years,
Did you run into any hurdles we scaled back to 5 licenses. We implemented a Data Analytics team (staff of 4 today)
over the last couple years, however they seem to primarily use Access and Excel. One
implementing ACL in your audit hurdle is getting people comfortable using it. Our Data Analytic team is comprised of
approach? folks that had experience using other tools such as Access, so their unfamiliarity with the
tool has contributed to limited use.
What types of processes/tests do you •Assessing operational areas, transactions, system calculations,
use ACL for? payroll activity, disbursements, collections, etc.
Did you compare ACL with other data •The department had ACL when I joined. I'm not sure what
analytic software (which ones?) & do comparisons were done to other tools. I consider ACL to be the
you consider that ACL is the best tool best tool for the intended functionality, however I'm not familiar
for the intended functionalities? with other products other than Excel or Access.
What do you think can be the major •Population Testing, the graphs are also useful, telling the story
outputs of ACL from the Internal Audit
perspective? with data provides facts rather than just opinions.
Do you feel ACL has • I think ACL has added value to my company. ACL has functionality
added value to your built-in to tackle key analytic steps in quick and simple commands (i.e.
table joins, duplicate analysis, stratification) to allow data to be quickly
company & if so, converted into usable analysis for decision making, risk identification
and quick identification of gaps, issues or other control
describe how ACL concerns. Excel is a great tool, but seems to require more steps and
adds more value than more intricate knowledge of the particular commands and tools, and it
can't do everything that ACL can… certainly not as quickly either.
Excel or another tool?
Any other • Like any tool, ACL is most usable and beneficial when you understand
considerations/ info what it has to offer and how to perform the intended analysis. The first
hurdle is getting folks comfortable using the tool, then overcoming the
you would like to challenge of how best to get the actual data needed to perform the
right analysis.
share?
LEGAL CAVEAT
The Audit Director Roundtable has worked to ensure the accuracy of the information
it provides to its members. This report relies upon data obtained from many sources,
however, and the Audit Director Roundtable cannot guarantee the accuracy of the
information or its analysis in all cases. Furthermore, the Audit Director Roundtable is
not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. Its reports
should not be construed as professional advice on any particular set of facts or
circumstances. Members requiring such services are advised to consult an
appropriate professional. Neither the Corporate Executive Board nor its programs
are responsible for any claims or losses that may arise from a) any errors or
omissions in their reports, whether caused by the Audit Director Roundtable or its
sources, or b) reliance upon any recommendation made by the Audit Director
Roundtable .