LO1

You were required to discuss theories of punishment and sentencing, where you discussed
the retributive, preventive, reformative theories of punishment.

You could have as well explained the  expiatory and deterrence theories of punishment. and
discussed them very briefly as  covering the relevant legislations for punishment where you
stated the Offender Management Act 2007  as well as the National Standards Management
of Offenders and the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2015 provided with short explanations.

You were also required to investigate a range of organisations and their roles involved in
offender management  where you mentioned only the Prison and Probation service.

In order to achieve a higher grade all the LO need to be covered:

Investigating a range (plural) organisations and their role as well as  assessing on  how these
work together by explaining the different co-operation programmes of the involved
organisations 

LO2 Not achieved

You were required to illustrate the community sentences that are imposed by the courts,
where you illustrated the different sorts of punishment they could receive as well as the
different programmes that exist in for community sentencing.

In order to achieve a higher grade all the LO need to be covered such as illustrating
community sentences and its different sorts of  punishment they could receive as well as the
different programmes that exist in for community sentencing. This would have helped you
in order to achieve a higher grade.

You were also asked to analyse how non-governmental organisations manage offenders
where you outlined what they do but did not analyse how they manage the offenders and
the impact it has.

In order to achieve a higher grade all the LO need to be covered such as analysing how
NGO's manage offenders.

Not achieved

1
You were also asked to analyse how non-governmental organisations manage offenders
where you outlined what they do but did not analyse how they manage the offenders and
the impact it has.

Not covered

In order to achieve a higher grade all the LO need to be covered such as analysing how
NGO's manage offenders. Explain how the NGO's manage offenders. You need to be more
precise in the information your provide as well you have covered what they do but not how.
How was the importance to cover.

General Feedback:

You have a quite similarity mark.

As well did you make sure the language and sentence structure are correct, since there are
many words or structures that you used that did not make sense or are not existing.

However, in order to achieve a higher grade all the LO need to be covered such as being
precise and :

1.Illustrating community sentences and its different sorts of  punishment they could receive
as well as the different programmes that exist in for community sentencing. This would have
helped you in order to achieve a higher grade.

2. Analysing how non-governmental organisations manage offenders By using and f. ex. a

figure to analyse how the NGO's manage offenders and also eventual state if they are
efficient or not by doing so. In the analysis of management of offenders you should also
have included the probation officer and his role as well as how NGO's control and monitor
the convicted. 

3. Evaluate if the measures of community offender management are effective by using data
and graphics in order to determine if they are effective or not as well as covering all the
community sentences.

Covering these additional LO might have helped you in achieving a higher grade.

 Grade: Referral

Marker: P.W.

 Date: 20.04.2020

2
Contents
INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................3

The nature of offender management........................................................................................4

PUNISHMENT THEORY AND ROLE OF SENTENCING..............................................................4

Figure 1: Offender Management.......................................................................................4

ORGANIZATIONAL INVOLVEMENT.........................................................................................6

PARTNERSHIP WORKING IN OFFENDER MANAGEMENT.......................................................6

The management of offenders in the community.....................................................................8

COMMUNITY SENTENCES BY COURT.....................................................................................8

INVOLVEMENT OF ORGANIZATION IN COMMUNITY OFFENDER MANAGEMENT................8

ORGANIZATIONS ROLE IN OFFENDER MANAGEMENT..........................................................9

OFFENDER MANAGEMENT IN COMMUNITY...........................................................................10

CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................11

REFERENCES.............................................................................................................................12

3
LO1

You were required to discuss theories of punishment and sentencing, where you discussed
the retributive, preventive, reformative theories of punishment.

You could have as well explained the  expiatory and deterrence theories of punishment. and
discussed them very briefly as  covering the relevant legislations for punishment where you
stated the Offender Management Act 2007  as well as the National Standards Management
of Offenders and the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2015 provided with short explanations.

You were also required to investigate a range of organisations and their roles involved in
offender management  where you mentioned only the Prison and Probation service.

In order to achieve a higher grade all the LO need to be covered:

Investigating a range (plural) organisations and their role as well as  assessing on  how these
work together by explaining the different co-operation programmes of the involved
organisations 

LO2 Not achieved

You were required to illustrate the community sentences that are imposed by the courts,
where you illustrated the different sorts of punishment they could receive as well as the
different programmes that exist in for community sentencing.

In order to achieve a higher grade all the LO need to be covered such as illustrating
community sentences and its different sorts of  punishment they could receive as well as the
different programmes that exist in for community sentencing. This would have helped you
in order to achieve a higher grade.

You were also asked to analyse how non-governmental organisations manage offenders
where you outlined what they do but did not analyse how they manage the offenders and
the impact it has.

In order to achieve a higher grade all the LO need to be covered such as analysing how
NGO's manage offenders.

Not achieved

4
You were also asked to analyse how non-governmental organisations manage offenders
where you outlined what they do but did not analyse how they manage the offenders and
the impact it has.

Not covered

In order to achieve a higher grade all the LO need to be covered such as analysing how
NGO's manage offenders. Explain how the NGO's manage offenders. You need to be more
precise in the information your provide as well you have covered what they do but not how.
How was the importance to cover.

General Feedback:

You have a quite similarity mark.

As well did you make sure the language and sentence structure are correct, since there are
many words or structures that you used that did not make sense or are not existing.

However, in order to achieve a higher grade all the LO need to be covered such as being
precise and :

1.Illustrating community sentences and its different sorts of  punishment they could receive
as well as the different programmes that exist in for community sentencing. This would have
helped you in order to achieve a higher grade.

2. Analysing how non-governmental organisations manage offenders By using and f. ex. a

figure to analyse how the NGO's manage offenders and also eventual state if they are
efficient or not by doing so. In the analysis of management of offenders you should also
have included the probation officer and his role as well as how NGO's control and monitor
the convicted. 

3. Evaluate if the measures of community offender management are effective by using data
and graphics in order to determine if they are effective or not as well as covering all the
community sentences.

Covering these additional LO might have helped you in achieving a higher grade.

 Grade: Referral

Marker: P.W.

 Date: 20.04.2020

5
INTRODUCTION

‘Offender Management’ is almost how one’s time in jail and beneath supervision within the
community is managed. The point of offender administration is to undertake to restore people
so they are less likely to irritate within the future. Include references/works cited

This may cruel setting distinctive objectives for someone who is total amid to other’s
sentence. These objectives are known as your sentence arrange. The sentencing will
incorporate the things that are wished by the criminal to do to reduce the chance of
reoffending within the community. In case, one needs to have got an access to risk a life of a
genuine person who is hurt this is medium, tall or exceptionally tall. It'll also incorporate
things you wish to do to reduce the hazard of harm. it seems that incorporate things that one
is attending to do to change the way it is required is carried out in some cases, or how you're
getting to handle issues to do with drugs and alcohol (Weaver and Mcneill, 2010). It seems to
incorporate completion of wrongdoer conduct courses which are pertinent to your offence. It
might incorporate things to assist the resettlement after discharge can be assessed with the
progression of instruction and employability. Include references/works cited

Jail and probation administrations utilize a device called the Wrongdoer Appraisal
Framework. This is often frequently called OASys you need to write the name out the first time
you use it. Staff utilizes OASys to total a hazard and needs evaluation. This implies that why
to offend or irritate someone who is not able to assist someone for the work. It additionally
implies working out in case you're likely to hurt yourself or other individuals, and what can
be done to form this less likely. (Canton and Hancock, 2013).

6
The nature of offender management

PUNISHMENT THEORY AND ROLE OF SENTENCING

Results after any offence are named as a discipline. What are you trying to say does not make
sense. Disciplines make a difference the guilty party to prevent from doing same off-base
work and change them into a law-abiding citizen. Discipline for any criminal depends on the
wrongdoing and kind of society lied in. The quick result that takes after a criminal act is
known as discipline. Where do you take this point of view from? In this way, discipline is
characterized as enduring, misfortune, torment, or any other punishment that's dispensed on
an individual for the wrongdoing by the concerned specialist. There are diverse hypotheses of
discipline in law Include references/works cited

. Change law-breaker into law-abiders may be an intense assignment and application of

different speculations offer assistance to document this assignment (Easton and Piper, 2012).

7
Figure 1: Offender Management Looks more like punishment theories than only offender

management

Source: Easton and Piper, 2012

There are distinctive sorts of discipline that an individual can confront. In arrange to get it
them, to begin with, we got to get it the hypotheses of the discipline. grammar. There are
majorly four hypotheses of discipline. These speculations are the obstruction hypothesis,
retributive hypothesis, preventive hypothesis, and reformative hypothesis. We are going to
talk about these speculations in length below. Include references/works cited

Deterrent Theory: The retributive hypothesis accepts that the discipline is given as it were for
it. Hence, it proposes that fiend is thought to be returned for fiendish without taking into think
any results. There are two speculations in which this hypothesis can be isolated assist. They
are particular discouragement and common discouragement (Paternoster, 2018).

Retributive Theory: Retribution is the foremost antiquated defines for discipline. This
hypothesis demands that an individual merits discipline as he has done a wrongful deed. Too,
this hypothesis means that no individual should be captured unless that individual has broken
the law (Markel, 2012). Here are the conditions where an individual is considered as a
wrongdoer are:

 The punishment given will be comparable to the grievance caused by the person.
 Performed wrongdoing of certain culpability.
 That comparable people have been forced for comparable offences.
 That the activity performed was by him and he was as it was dependable for it.
 Moreover, he had full information about the punishment framework and conceivable
results.

Preventive Theory: This hypothesis has utilized a restriction that a wrongdoer if rehashes the
criminal act is at fault for passing, banish or detainment. The hypothesis gets its significance
from the idea that society must be ensured by offenders. In this way, the discipline here is for
solidarity and defence. The present-day criminologists saw the preventive hypothesis from a
distinctive see (Husak, 2011).

8
They begin with realized that the social and financial powers ought to be expelled from
society. Moreover, one must pay consideration to people who appear anti-social behaviour.
Typically since of mental and natural handicaps.

Reformative Theory: Deterrence and retributive are cases of classical and non-classical
methods of insight. The reformative hypothesis was born out of the positive hypothesis that
the central point of wrongdoing is positive considering. In this way, agreeing to this
hypothesis, the objective of discipline has to be reformation by the offender. So, this is often
not a discipline essentially but or maybe a rehabilitative handle. Hence, this handle makes a
difference in making a criminal a great citizen as much as conceivable. Moreover, it makes
the citizen an important citizen and an upright straight man (Priya, 2014).

ORGANIZATIONAL INVOLVEMENT

It comes at a vital time when the qualifying courses of action for probation officers are
changing and with the rise of the National Wrongdoer Administration Benefit (NOMS) and
the execution of the Wrongdoer Administration Demonstrate.

Warwickshire and West Mercia Community Restoration Company are one of the 21
Community and Recovery Companies (CRCs) over Britain and Ribs. They cover
Warwickshire, Herefordshire, Shropshire, Worcestershire and Telford &Wrekin.CRCs were
shaped as a result of the government's Changing Restoration program which part the existing
35 Probation Trusts into two parts - a National Probation Benefit and 21 CRCs.
Warwickshire and West Mercia blended to ended up Warwickshire and West Mercia
Community Recovery Company (WWMCRC). They are a portion of the criminal equity
framework and work in an organization with the National Probation Benefit, police,
detainment facilities and courts. We too work with nearby specialists, wellbeing and
intentional segment associations (Levi, 2016).

In 1997, the approaching Unused Work government put organization working at the middle
of its modernization motivation definition of an organization will be utilized, indicating 'a
generally formalized course of action between two or more associations in arrange to attain a
set of goals, by and large with a degree of autonomy from anyone partner'. Throughout the
Blair organizations, associations got to be a key include of open benefit delivery, with a few

9
5,500 organizations within the UK by 2005, bookkeeping for £3 billion of open use.
Numerous of those organizations included association (Meadows et al., 2014).

PARTNERSHIP WORKING IN OFFENDER MANAGEMENT

Organization working is key to our victory. Work with criminal equity benefit organizations
and other statutory organizations but past this we have created organizations with
associations from the third division, to assist us to accomplish goals. Statutory Agencies work
in an organization with other statutory organizations within the criminal equity framework
such as the Police, Courts, the Jail Benefit and CPS. We too work with organizations exterior
of the criminal equity framework such as Nearby Specialists, lodging suppliers and wellbeing
administrations. For illustration, our liquor and medicate treatment intercessions are
advertised through association organizations which shift over the zone (Calder and Goodman,
2013).

The Probation Benefit contains a long and glad history of connections with a extend of
statutory and non-statutory associations. Without a doubt, the Probation Service's interesting
position inside the criminal equity framework has made successful working connections basic
with sentences, police and prison officers, and an entire have of associations within the
deliberate and community division. the Probation Benefit has customarily worked at the same
time inside the formalized and statutory criminal equity framework and limited, community
situations. Probation officers have a long convention of possessing proficient space that
includes prompting sentences on the foremost appropriate (Dawson and Stanko, 2013).

10
The management of offenders in the community

COMMUNITY SENTENCES BY COURT

One will get a community sentence if you're sentenced of wrongdoing by a court but are not
sent to prison. It may be unpaid to the work done in the neighbourhood community, like
evacuating spray painting. This can be called Community Payback. Community sentences
can be given for violations such as damaging property, benefit fraud and assault, you may get
a community sentence if the court considers you're more likely to halt committing
wrongdoing than in case you go to prison it's the primary time you've got committed a crime
you have a mental wellbeing condition that influences your conduct (Chui, 2013).

There are some general guidelines under which the pre-sentence and community orders are
applied to the custody of the case. The court might impose a term of imprisonment between
14 days and 2 years where the magistrates have the sentencing power who may be suspended
the sentence for between 6 months and 2 years. This can reflect on the length of the sentence
where up to 12 months might be normal.

INVOLVEMENT OF ORGANIZATION IN COMMUNITY OFFENDER

MANAGEMENT

In its reaction to the Remedial Administrations Audit, the Government committed NOMS to
the execution of “an unused approach to guilty party management” – a single approach. This
single approach has got to apply over the wide run of diverse sentences to which offenders
are subject, and must be adaptable sufficient to reply to the different needs, circumstances
and inspirations of guilty parties themselves. It must grasp the work of the distinctive
suppliers of an offender’s remedial encounter (Rex and Hosking, 2013). It ought to be "end-
to-end", consistent, and coordinates, with a single guilty party director capable for the
entirety of every single sentence. But past this determination, the detail of its plan, and the
challenge of its implementation are for NOMS to resolve.

The NOMS Guilty party Administration Show sets out this detail. It was begun in January
2005. Through both our North West Locale PATHFINDER and its roll-out for community

11
orders, the Show has as of now demonstrated its worth. NOMS introduce a five-year strategy
to reduce reoffending.

ORGANIZATIONS ROLE IN OFFENDER MANAGEMENT

The NOMS 1. you need to write the name completely out the first time when you use it.
2. Make sure that the names and references you use are correct because NOMS does not exist
anymore it has changed the name (Research needs to be accurate)
Guilty party Administration Show sets out this detail. It was encountered to be distributed in
January 2005 This does not make sense I am afraid . The National Guilty Party Administration
Service (NOMS) was made as an Official Office of the Service of Equity in July
2008.include refences/works cited Harsh both our North West Locale PATHFINDER and its
roll-out for community orders, the Demonstrate has as of now demonstrated its worth.You
were not asked to make a historical review. However if you do so than all the date needs to
be present since here is missing that they changed their name:

https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/national-offender-management-service
include refences/works cited

NOMS work is to secure the open and reduce reoffending by conveying the disciplines and
orders of the courts, making difference wrongdoers reform their lives and in doing so
anticipate future casualties of crime (Semitsoglou-Tsiapou et al., 2016). NOMS are mindful
for commissioning and delivering Jail and Probation Administrations across England and
Grains, with a coordinates approach to bolster successful guilty party administration in all
settings, guaranteeing best esteem for cash from public resources. include refences/works
cited NOMS do this specifically through open detainment facilities and the National
Probation Benefit and through commissioning private segment detainment facilities and
Community Recovery Companies in probation. We too work closely with others such as the
courts, neighbourhood specialists, police and the voluntary sector (Laufer et al., 2013).

12
OFFENDER MANAGEMENT IN COMMUNITY

The Government plans to make changes to the way guilty parties are directed within the
community, tallying blameworthy parties on Community Orders, to decrease reoffending.
This is written quite complicated. make sure your sentence structurre is as it should

The meeting ‘Punishment and Alter: Fruitful Community Sentences’ and the response to the
talk This does not make sense I am afraid proposed that each Community Organize ought to
incorporate a component sketched out to fulfil the reason for teaching. include
refences/works cited The Wrongdoing and Courts Act 2013 brought this suggestion into
authoritative effect, displaying more remedial components in Community Orders, such as
longer unpaid work hours and longer curfews (Wong et al., 2012).

The LSI-R means ? could be an imperative component of case planning, assisting staff in
analyzing information and recognizing has to be tended to within the case arrange. The
Division too employments the LSI-R to productively apportion assets to tall risk/needs guilty
parties permitting equitable management of workload over the Division. It recognizes key
zones of criminogenic need and empowers case administration methodologies to be assessed,
including consistency and credibility to choice making almost guilty parties (Bishop, 2010).

Community Guilty party Administrations started a comprehensive handle to enhance its

capacity to meet its key targets and increment the responsibility of service conveyance. As a
result of the introductory stages of the rebuild, Community Offender Services presently has
three locales adjusted with the Department’s Detainee and Custodial Service’s districts with
shared corporate and bolster administrations over custodial and community based remedial
services. This has made strides responsibility, with a few parts and capacities declining from
Community Wrongdoer Administrations Territorial Workplaces to Region Workplaces,
clearing the way for new Region Director Positions that will be responsible for overseeing a
cluster of District Office (Mythen et al., 2013).

13
CONCLUSION

The victory of probation is completely within the hands of the State Government and the
assets it apportions to the software engineers. Resources are required to utilize prepared
probation officers, to set up homes for that on probation additionally for their preparing other
than others. Thus whereas concluding it can be said that the concept of Probation would be
successful as it were where the legal and the administration work together there must be a
common understanding between the Officer (or) Judge and the Probation Officer (Meek et
al., 2013).

Probation would be compelling as it were when there's a true attempt made to exeProbation is
a certification of the human interior each being and it must be delivered de--importance. It
may be disillusioning to note that support of open in the correctional program is for the guilty
parties needs.

14
REFERENCES

Bishop, L., 2010. The challenges of GPS and sex offender management. Fed.Probation, 74,
p.33.

Calder, S.D. and Goodman, A.H., 2013. Transforming Rehabilitation, a fiscal motivated
approach to offender management. British Journal of Community Justice, 11(2/3), p.175.

Canton, R. and Hancock, D., 2013. Dictionary of probation and offender

management.Willan.

Chui, W.H., 2013. Community sentences.In Understanding criminal justice in Hong

Kong (pp. 212-234).Willan.

Dawson, P. and Stanko, B., 2013. Implementation, implementation, implementation: Insights

from offender management evaluations. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 7(3),
pp.289-298.

Easton, S. and Piper, C., 2012. Sentencing and punishment: The quest for justice. Oxford
University Press.

Husak, D., 2011. Lifting the cloak: preventive detention as punishment. San Diego L.
Rev., 48, p.1173.

Laufer, I., Rubin, D.G., Lis, E., Cox, B.W., Stubblefield, M.D., Yamada, Y. and Bilsky,
M.H., 2013. The NOMS framework: approach to the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors.
The oncologist, 18(6), p.744.

Levi, M., 2016. The phantom capitalists: The organization and control of long-firm fraud.
Routledge.

Markel, D., 2012. Retributive justice and the demands of democratic citizenship. Va. J. Crim.
L., 1, p.1.

Meadows, L., Kinsella, R., Ellingworth, D., Wong, K. and Senior, P., 2014.Mapping
Restorative Provision in England & Wales: Kent.

15
Meek, R., Gojkovic, D. and Mills, A., 2013. The involvement of nonprofit organizations in
prisoner reentry in the UK: Prisoner awareness and engagement. Journal of Offender
Rehabilitation, 52(5), pp.338-357.

Mythen, G., Walklate, S. and Kemshall, H., 2013.Decentralizing risk: The role of the
voluntary and community sector in the management of offenders. Criminology & Criminal
Justice, 13(4), pp.363-379.

Paternoster, R., 2018.Perceptual deterrence theory. In Deterrence, Choice, and Crime,

Volume 23 (pp. 81-106). Routledge.

Priya, T., 2014.Reformative Theory of Punishment. Acadamike Law Journal+ Knowledge

Center.

Rex, S. and Hosking, N., 2013.18 Supporting practitioners to engage

offenders. Understanding Penal Practice, p.271.

Semitsoglou-Tsiapou, S., Mous, A., Templeton, M.R., Graham, N.J., Leal, L.H. and Kruithof,
J.C., 2016.The role of natural organic matter in nitrite formation by LP-UV/H2O2 treatment
of nitrate-rich water. Water research, 106, pp.312-319.

Weaver, E. and Mcneill, F., 2010. Changing lives? Desistance research and offender
management.

Wong, K., O'Keeffe, C., Meadows, L., Davidson, J., Bird, H., Wilkinson, K. and Senior, P.,
2012. Increasing the voluntary and community sector's involvement in Integrated Offender
Management.

16