Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

ED ITORIAL

Both/and problem in an either/or world

B
efore the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have escaped from the lab decades ago—or, another vi-
pandemic, nuance and candor from govern- rus that was brought into the lab and not documented
ments were in short supply. Now they are al- somehow escaped. Either way, only a chain of unlikely
most nonexistent. Protecting the world from se- events could explain laboratory involvement.
vere acute respiratory syndrome–coronavirus 2 The U.S. administration instructed its intelligence
(SARS-CoV-2) can’t happen without internation- community to investigate this matter. Last week, these
al scientific collaboration. Progress on vaccines intelligence agencies ruled out that the virus was lab-
in China and the United States should make us optimis- engineered. They have not reached any conclusions H. Holden Thorp
tic that science will solve this problem, but the actions about whether a virus might have escaped from the
Editor-in-Chief,
of the governments involved are not equally inspiring. lab. But in the absence of evidence, the administration
Science journals.
The saber rattling by China and the United States is will likely turn uncertainty into “truth”—a lab escape—
hthorp@aaas.org;
unnecessary, as the broad impacts of the pandemic in that serves its narrative.

Downloaded from http://science.sciencemag.org/ on June 5, 2020


both countries are shared. Isn’t that worth curbing na- Even in the face of the intelligence report to the con- @hholdenthorp
tionalistic tendencies? Apparently not to China, which trary, U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo initially
has rebuffed efforts to understand said that “the best experts so far
the origin of SARS-CoV-2. And not seem to think it was man-made.” Ap-
to the Trump administration either, parently, the best experts are neither
which can’t grasp that it’s possible to
question the actions of the Chinese
“The saber scientists nor intelligence experts.
Pompeo claims to have additional
government about the early days of
the pandemic while embracing col-
rattling by evidence that we are unlikely to see,
if it even exists.
laboration with Chinese science. In a
worldwide pandemic, isn’t it best for
China and the What would we have learned from
the research that got squashed?
everyone to cooperate and try to save
all of humanity together?
United States is Daszak and his colleagues were
working to pinpoint hotspots in
We need a both/and approach, but
we are living in an either/or world.
unnecessary…” southern China with a high risk of
bat-to-human transfer (most likely
The latest setback is the deci- with an intermediary species in-
sion by the U.S. National Institutes volved) of coronaviruses. It might
of Health (NIH) to terminate the grant “Understand- be good to find those hotspots if we don’t want to go
ing the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” to Peter through all of this again. And as important, the bat
Daszak of the nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, who, with coronavirus sequences identified at the WIV were
NIH approval, shared one in five grant dollars with used in lab tests of the drug remdesivir, currently the
Shi Zhengli, a top coronavirologist at China’s Wuhan only scientifically supported treatment for COVID-19.
Institute of Virology (WIV). We are asked to believe Vanderbilt University’s Mark Denison, who helped ad-
that the highly ranked project was killed because even vance the drug, said of the Alliance’s research, “Our
though it sought to prevent the next bat-originating work on remdesivir absolutely would not have moved
human pandemic, it did not “align” with the NIH’s forward” without it.
goals and priorities. This comes while the adminis- I feel for, and admire, our scientific colleagues in the
tration is propping up and circulating the unproven U.S. federal government. They are giving all they’ve
theory that the virus escaped from the Shi lab at the got to protect the American public and others under
WIV, when the science is clearly in favor of zoonotic impossible circumstances. Before the pandemic, the
transfer in nature. NIH went overboard to deal with foreign influence in
The genetic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 rules out a U.S. research because of the nationalistic pressure it
lab-engineered virus. And although escape from a lab was under. Now, the agency is trying to dodge political
of a naturally occurring virus that was isolated from lunges from an administration that puts political suc-
bat specimens collected by scientists cannot be com- cess above human life.
pletely eliminated as the origin, the closest laboratory The tyranny of either/or is that we only survive on our
version of the virus (published by Shi and collabora- own. The promise of both/and is that the world is imper-
PHOTO: CAMERON DAVIDSON

tors) is separated from SARS-CoV-2 by at least 20 years fect but we’re all in this together.
of evolutionary time. SARS-CoV-2 would have had to –H. Holden Thorp

Published online 8 May 2020; 10.1126/science.abc6859

SCIENCE sciencemag.org 15 MAY 2020 • VOL 368 ISSUE 6492 681


Published by AAAS
Both/and problem in an either/or world
H. Holden Thorp

Science 368 (6492), 681.


DOI: 10.1126/science.abc6859originally published online May 8, 2020

Downloaded from http://science.sciencemag.org/ on June 5, 2020


ARTICLE TOOLS http://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6492/681

RELATED http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/12/541/eabb5883.full
CONTENT
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/12/534/eabb1469.full
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/11/499/eaat0360.full
http://stm.sciencemag.org/content/scitransmed/9/396/eaal3653.full
PERMISSIONS http://www.sciencemag.org/help/reprints-and-permissions

Use of this article is subject to the Terms of Service

Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published by the American Association for the Advancement of
Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005. The title Science is a registered trademark of AAAS.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of
Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen