Theme: Developing Soft Skills Among Students

Sub-theme: Adaptability
Topic: Strategic to motivate the students to learn at primary level

1- Why did you select this specific sub-theme and topic? Relate it to your experience/
problem in your classroom/ institution.
I select sub theme adaptability and my topic is “Strategic to motivate the students to learn
at primary level” because I am a science teacher and am doing teaching from almost 5
years in Islamia model public school KTS. The area where this school is a basically a
town. I observed inside class that the students taking no or very less interest in the science
subjects. We have a few examples of this beneath. I enlisted some of problems which I
think are reason of lack of interest of students towards their study.
a) Locating schoolwork hard, or having problems concentrating in class if others are
noisy and disruptive complex relationships with buddies and friendship agencies
not getting on with instructors, feeling like you're labeled as 'problem' bullying
problems at domestic - your dad and mom’ dating, sibling troubles, a housing
problem or definitely feeling unsupported Unlike within the beyond while
teachers can’t just send off their syllabus and usually test the scholars.
b) Even whilst it's miles the role of teacher to offer students with satisfactory
education, the system is simplest, complete with the cooperation and expertise of
dad and mom and faculty control. Parents have to be the correct working
companions of teachers to provide the high-quality of getting to know to enjoy for
students.
c) If parents are stepping away from their responsibility, it may be tough for
instructors to address at least the various students. That is one motive why
nowadays teachers are taking projects to set up a meeting with dad and mom and
communicating them through apps if you want to have a watch at the development
of their infant.
d) Students see little value in the subject or its content. Regardless of the goal price
of interest or subject, if school students do now not apprehend its value, it may
motivate them to spend effort. However, if students see how coursework connects
to their desires, interests, and issues, they'll be more likely to price it, and thus
extra encouraged to make investments effort and time.
e) Students do no longer accept as true with that their efforts will improve their
overall performance. If students do now not consider that their efforts are
probably to improve their overall performance, they will now not inspire paintings
tough. It may affect motivation, for example, if a path that has a recognition for
being inordinately hard. Students may have had discouraging reports in similar
courses or on early assignments in a path that convince them they cannot do the
paintings.
f) Students do not find the classroom climate as supportive. Students’ motivation to
exert attempt in a route or persist in a main is suffering from schoolroom weather:
 the mixed highbrow, social, emotional, and bodily environments wherein students
learn.

2- What was your discussion with your colleague/ friend / senior teacher or supervisor
regarding the problem?

I discussed this problem with my colleagues as a part of being a motivated teacher

comes through your standard behavior and attitude. There’s plenty to be stated for
humans that often smile, provide a happy and cheery outlook on lifestyles and
encounter as upbeat and quality to be around–regardless of how they’re genuinely
feeling. Making your classroom a heat, colorful and stimulating surroundings is also
key to growing a nice area.
It’s also essential which you praise your primary school students for correct paintings
as you move alongside. It need not be all the time, as then it will grow to expected and
could keep less fee when you reward them. But recognizing hard work and providing
reward will ensure your primary school students stay encouraged and feeling as
although their work is at the right track forwards and which you’re noticing their
efforts.
Mixing matters up is also key. If you’re doing the equal component all the time, it’ll
emerge as uninteresting and repetitive. Look at the materials you’re teaching and
reflect inconsideration on how you may place a brand new spin on them. Perhaps you
switch something into a performing activity or perhaps you may flip statistics or
figures into a track to help to make it greater memorable. Perhaps you may get
primary school students operating together on a set interest–that is an awesome
manner of assisting primary school students to encourage every difference. Be
creative–use posters, offer visible aids and diagrams, show movies and play games.
Working in distinctive surroundings will help to preserve students on their toes.
Research has observed that when we flow around in various spaces even as learning,
we're capable of do not forget greater information better than if we had just stayed in
a single area. This is because of the associations the mind makes. The extra you
encourage movement in gaining knowledge of, the greater it absorbs the statistics.
Perhaps you do a little painting within the playground, a few insides the schoolroom
and some of the faculty grounds. Maybe you look at taking your primary school
students on an area experience on the way to add an actual-life dimension to their
research.
Setting expectations within the lecture room is key and gives your students a trendy to
work towards. However, when you discover your primary school students want a
nudge forwards, supplying small incentives can help make learning fun. Encouraging
an aggressive power can help gas students and push them similarly–this will range
from supplying a unique privilege to having a category pizza celebration if all of them
gain a positive grade. There are a purpose sales businesses provide workforce
bonuses–it constantly motivates!
Finally, displaying primary school students how records they’re studying is beneficial
to actual-existence situations will assist them to see the practical utility that it holds.
 Often primary school students will switch off when they don’t see how it will ever
benefit them, however, if you could connect it to life outside the study room, it'll
provide it new significance and motivate them to concentrate extra attentively.

3- What did you find about the problem in the existing literature (books, articles/
websites)?

The schooling undertaking offered on this paper endeavors to examine the feasibility
of incorporating adaptive structures into LMS systems, through the use of them each
in schooling & learning process and at paintings. This case study is geared toward
employability and the task to publish improvement. For this motive, we have created
a manner that is bendy both to the scholar pattern (and to the process sample. The
developed process is adaptable both to the student (via the incorporation of an
adaptable machine with an LMS gadget) and to the activity version (through an
adaptable machine to the knowledge control). The evaluation was qualitative and
measured the procedure (feasibility to use adaptive systems) and the performance of
the method (applicability and employability).
The capability of the specifically developed equipment allowed us to grade the degree
of motivation inside the schooling process, to dynamically range the training plan
from the student’s moves and to perceive the resources that excellent met the task
wishes.

1998 observe performed via scientists from the City Centre For Learning and Work
Research at Griffith Univ. And The Findings of Work, Instruction, and Education, at
Monash Univ. Wanted to assess the payments of proficiency-based total education
(CBT) and appraisal to Australian occupational training and preparation.
"Introduction" (Stephen Billet, Fred Beven) encapsulates the conclusions of the
assignment's three sub projects. "Reform, Changes, and Transformation: A
Commentary at the Implementation and Evolution of CBT" they describes the
functional frameworks of the proficiency organization and occupational education.
"Procedures for Data Gathering, Analysis and Integration of Subprojects" (Fred
Beven, Sharon Hayes) particulars the assets and techniques used to accumulate
information regarding CBT. "CBT as a Model of Curriculum Development" (Stephen
Billet) discusses how the creation of CBT prompted national curriculum exercise.
"Assessment Practices" (Charlie McKavanagh) explores the assessment of know-how
and methods of statistical analysis. "The Role of the Instructor" (Lawrence Angus,
Terri Seddon, John Gough, Ian Robertson) traces the converting function of the
instructor inside CBT and CBT's trajectory and educational consequences. "Findings,
Conclusions, and Recommendations" (Stephen Billet, Fred Beven, Charlie
McKavanagh, Lawrence Angus, Sharon Hayes, Ian Robertson John Gough, , Terri
Seddon) deliberates the three sub projects within the setting of the growth of a bendy
and malleable paintings pressure and offers and hints developing from the sub
projects. The ten centuries since the creation of a similar gadget of CBT has witnessed
a vast development in the shape and enterprise of Australia's occupational academic
device. To make similarly progress, an exchange in importance on coverage is wanted
to transport past CBT and apprehend the vital function instructors play in reaching the
USA's want for a bendy, adaptable and worldwide aggressive place of job.

Through a review on a first-year recruit who chose the course Principles of

Management, this paper observationally examined the relationship among
understudy's versatility to educating and acting in primary school student's craving to
teacher's instructing approach and their learning side interest by using assessing an
Ordered Response Model. Discoveries show that: over 33% understudy cannot adjust
to primary school's training and learning mode, and a huge piece of undergrads are
brief of dissecting inspiration; the understudy's versatility to instructing and picking
up information on in primary school, the notoriety certificate to educator's showing
strategy, the thought process obviously political race and the mindfulness in class is
incredible wonderful components influencing student's acting premium.

E-Learning is a spic and span type of teaching method for acing inside the 21st
century. E-Teachers are e-Learning instructional architects, facilitators of exchange,
and circumstance recalls specialists. The jobs of e-Teachers are to enrich students'
subjective commitment and communication. I do this by using the endowments of PC
interceded correspondence with additional openness and versatility. This article
diagramed sociocultural ideas, value-based separation, and PC interceded verbal
trade, which helps the uniqueness of showing parts of e-Learning. Instructional
substance, assessment systems, and advanced libraries are referenced as exact
components of e-Teaching. All the partners of e-Learning should put forth attempts to
close value-based separation and increment verbal quickness.
This article investigates and analyses the education item of physical culture education
application in university and the motivation of the coaching of the bodily lifestyle
route in center primary school thorough a questionnaire and interviews with experts.
Questions at issue consist of the objective of university physical subculture education
software, the present state of affairs of the teaching of bodily culture in middle school,
middle primary school primary school students and teachers' understanding of the
goal and venture of bodily lifestyle teaching, the professional potential and complete
first-class of future instructors, and the improvement trend of the teaching of middle
faculty bodily way of life. It concludes that the placing of educating objective and
development of guides need to now not most effective don't forget the necessity of
subject creation, but also meet the needs of its goal market. It additionally concludes
that the coaching of center faculty bodily lifestyle should middle on students' bodily
and intellectual fitness, the obtaining of information and talents, and their ideology
and man or woman schooling.
The literature has frequently mentioned instructors’ motivation or flexibility as a
principal issue ineffective coaching and gaining knowledge of. Very Much of this
work has taken into consideration instructors’ motivation in academic methods (e.g.,
Corno, 2008, Vaughn. & Parsons, 2013, Parsons et al., 2012;). For example, Corno
(2008) underscores the significance of adaptive coaching methods to satisfy the
wishes of school children who may additionally have many developing degrees,
cognitive abilities, foreign language, Social foundations, social-passionate abilities,
and financial foundations. Likewise, Parsons, Williams, Burrowbridge, and Mauk
(2012; see furthermore Parsons, 2012) talk about the centrality of development and
"in-the-second model" in the talk room if you need to react to understudies' needs and
interests. All the more precisely, Parsons and associates (2012) found the educators'
utilization of enhancements in their guidance together with unconstrained showing or
platform, changing directions, or working one-on-one with remarkable understudies.

Analysts have additionally mulled over the capacity of versatility more prominent
extensively—this is, past instructional adaptation and regarding educators' performing
at works of art (e.g., Hargreaves, 2005; Mansfield et al., 2012). For instance,
Mansfield, Beltman, Cost, and McConney (2012) tried portrayals from early expert
educators of being a strong teacher and checked that being versatile and adaptable
changed into an essential point in members' reactions.

The people showed that versatility involves activities that incorporate changing under
new jobs, tolerating alterations, and having a "Plan B." As referenced above, we exert
that flexibility is an ensuring issue this is strong of strength. More nowadays, Collie
and Martin (2015) looked to grow aptitude of educators' flexibility and its relationship
with different variables that can be remarkable to instructors' healthy and amazing
performing busy working, and understudies' top-notch results. They used Martin et
al.'s. (2012) tripartite rendition and the going with Versatility Scale to test educators'
psychological,

Conduct and enthusiastic flexibility. Of perception, this evaluation was never again
specific to the work environment—it concerned educators' capability to be versatile in
presence normal (an area well known).

As a major aspect of the view, Collie, and Martin (2015) were keen on breaking down
whether educators' impression of the painting's climate identified with their flexibility.
To degree works of art climate, they analyzed educators' impression of principals'
self-sufficiency strength at artworks. Originating from self-assurance idea (Deci and
Ryan, 2012), self-governance help alludes to conduct with the guide of authority
recognition that confirms staff' strengthening and self-assurance. On account of
principals, this includes moves remembering welcoming educators' contribution for
dynamic, giving educators inclination over their canvases duties and tuning in two
instructors' viewpoints (Deci and Ryan, 2012; see furthermore Collie, Perry, and
Martin, 2015). Collie and Martin verified that once educators saw their overwhelming
to be more noteworthy independence strong, they would be wise to flexibility. They
likewise tried educator pleasantly being and hierarchical duty in the view and found
that extra versatile instructors (and individuals who saw the extra principal
 self-rule help) would report better phases of appropriately being and hierarchical
commitment.

In the last, a piece of the investigation, Collie, and Martin (2015) tried the degree to
which teachers' versatility and the inverse managerial focus components identified
with understudies' numeracy satisfaction. The discoveries showed that teachers who
detailed extra appropriate being would, in general, have undergrads who gained better
satisfaction stages. It is in like manner basic to know that teachers' flexibility
transformed into an indirect path related to understudies' accomplishment through
educators' pleasantly being.

Taken together at that point, Collie and Martin's discoveries recommend that
flexibility plays out a center job in educators' working at artistic creations and that it is
additionally in an indirect manner identified with undergrads' results. Also, principals'
self-sufficiency strength appears to establish a basic framework for teachers'
flexibility.

4- What were the major variables/ construct of your project? Give definitions/
description from literature.

Regarding the problem, goals and tasks of research the following variables have been
chosen: (1) students’ evaluation on influence of certain characteristics of teaching
process on motivation to learn; (2) characteristics of motivation to learn; and (3)
grade, general success in school and gender of students.

5- What did you want to achieve in this research project?

My aim of this research is study of motivation of students to learn in teaching process

in primary school, as well as evaluation of motivation influence of certain elements of
teaching process to the motivation of students.
On the basis of defined aim, the following research objectives have been defined:
(1) To examine motivation characteristics to learn of students in primary school.
Students evaluate self-efficiency and own competencies, expectations of success, self-
value, self-determination or academic control, express own attributions and
convictions on ability to control (engagement, challenge, control), interest in teaching
topics, evaluating level of academic progress, goals (mastery, performance goals and
non-conformity).
(2)To establish whether students determine certain characteristics of teaching process
as motivating or demotivating. Students have a task to evaluate how much such
activities motivate or demotivate them to learn.
(3)To establish practical pedagogic implications for teaching process on the basis of
research results. It will be pointed on need to achieve in educational practice some
changes that will contribute better quality of education process. Actually, there will be
 proposed certain steps based on results that teachers can apply in motivation
incentives with students to learn within teaching process.

6- Who were the participants in your project?

The participants of my projects are students, school staff and parents of students. The
population of this survey comprises 1st , 2nd, 3rd 4th , and 5th grade of primary level
students in the Islamia model public school KTS . I compose the pattern of the take of
251 primary school students in the faculties determine according to the without
problems accessible sampling approach. There have participated 251 students in total.
Participants were in 1st , 2nd, 3rd 4th , and 5th grade of primary school. The most of
participants are in 4th and 5th grade (58.2%) while percent 1st , 2nd, and 3rd grade
students is lower (41.8%). When talking about the sample structure per gender, it can
be said that girls are in somewhat higher percent (56.9%) comparing with boys
(43.1%). During the research realization the students have been asked information of
their school success for the first half of the current school year because research has
been conducted in the second half of the school year. Students have signed in an
average mark for general success. The most of the percent of students have very good
success (41.2%), and the least sufficient success (0.6%).

7- How did you try to solve this problem?

Here is possible to select certain actions that stimulate students to the greatest extent
and these are practical implications for teaching process. Indeed, teachers should
implement the following actions that motivate students:
(1) Tasks and activities for students – interesting, stimulating and diverse tasks,
activities organized by a teacher in teaching process and which help to develop
learning strategy; tasks connected with former knowledge from different school
subjects and experience from everyday life.
(2)Autonomy of students – organization of teaching that stimulates students to be
active, teacher urge students to take initiative for own learning, teacher accept all
suggestions from students for work in the classroom; and each individual students has
the chance to show independence in the learning process; teachers provide students to
solve the tasks in speed they like.
(3)Efficient teaching – teacher follow up with students in the classroom, carefully
listen students and tries to understand their behaviour; teachers explain significances
of the topic works out in the classroom as well as working goals; teacher provide
examples of life situations where topics could be used as examples; teacher teach in
small steps, provide detailed explanations and instructions for work and chances to
students to practice all they learn during the class; students have clear and detailed
instructions to solve tasks during the class with large number of questions regarding
the topics to check how students truly understand the lessons; during practicing
teacher gives returning information to students and correct them if making
mistakes; each class, or at least ones per week, teachers provide comments on the
work of students and their progress.
 (4)Evaluation of teaching – teacher clearly states the mode of evaluation of students’
success and progress in learning; teacher follow up with student and praise the work
of each student individually when recognize the progress in learning or effort to work
better; teacher follows up with the work during classes and rewards progress of a
student in learning in relation to the former success and not in relation with other
students in the classroom; teachers provide possibility to students to improve success
and marks; teachers evaluate success of students in their work at the classroom
through following up with products of their activities; evaluation is public.
(5)Cooperative learning – when students work in a group teacher allows them to talk
and exchange ideas about the set task; teacher urges them to express own ideas about
the task and to accept ideas of other students; urges them to cooperate during the class
and to design and achieve common aim of learning and not to compete in between,
one against other; formed groups are heterogeneous (different gender, interests in,
etc.), all participate actively and help each other in group work; teachers give to
students a task to research together with a group member certain topic and present
results in the classroom.
(6)Individual work – students may have different tasks so success of one students
does not depend on the other; teachers urges students to achieve own exceptional
results and not to compete with others in the classroom.

8- What kind of instrument was used to collect the data? How was the instrument
developed?

The instruments used for this study has been constructed and it contains the
following:
Interview with teachers and parents
Questioner for students
Interview with the Teachers contains that I have asked the teachers about the reasons
for disinterest in gaining knowledge of the target subjects such as science. During the
thorough interview, I asked some questions about the workable ways of maintaining
motivation within the schoolroom. The most important interview became carried out
with the trainer whose classroom became found. However, questions had asked other
Science instructors to examine their reviews in a collaborative framework. I predicted
each point of view to contribute to the solution of the trouble. Through the interview,
I aimed it to elicit how teachers seem motivated in science getting to know.
Questionnaire to the Students is a close-ended questionnaire changed into given to the
1st , 2nd, 3rd 4th , and 5th grade primary school students. In this look close-ended
questionnaires aimed at permitting school students to give answers in a very easy way
and show their feelings and thoughts freely without dilemma. I had asked students
when they felt influenced or unmotivated in a science course. I had also asked them
had been also what factors affected their willingness closer to the lesson. The
questionnaire played a role in making school student beliefs and standpoints explicit
concerning the concept of motivation. It ensured them their names might now not
expose without their consent.
 QUESTIONNAIRE

Researcher-Made Questionnaire On Factors Affecting Science Performance Islamia model public

school KTS

NAME:
(optional)

Student-related Factors

Direction: Please check (Q) and rate yourself honestly based on what you actually do given the
statements using the following scales:

5 — always 4 — Often 3 — sometimes 2 — rarely 1 — never

A. Interest 5 4 3 2 1
1. I make myself prepared for the science subject
2. I listen attentively to the lecture of my science teacher.
3. I actively participate in the discussion, answe
9- What were the findings and conclusion?

We assumed that primary school students are partially motivated to learn. The results
of the research confirmed this hypothesis. The results lead us to conclude that the
students believe they can achieve their goals by self- efficacy, the students have the
high level of self-perception of competences, i.e. they highly value the abilities and
competences needed to perform the tasks. They also highly value self – determination
i.e. the feeling of freedom while doing interesting and important activities. Self –
worth, i.e. students’ views of their own qualities, is least valued, just above the half of
the total number of points.
As far as adaptive attributions and students’ beliefs in perceived control are
concerned, we conclude that students love performing challenging tasks while, at the
same time, perceiving partially high perceived control. More than 50% of the students
are interested in the learning process. The results show the high level of value of
academic achievements. As far as academic goals are concerned, mastery goals are
more important for students than performance goals. The students are more interested
in developing their competences, expanding their knowledge and understanding
through deliberate learning than demonstrating the skills or performing the activities.
Apart from academic goals, social goals are also important to students. However, the
data show that nonconformity is not satisfactorily developed.

10- Summary of the project

The paper presents considerations about the characteristics of students’ motivation in

primary school and how students view certain characteristics of the teaching process
as motivating or demotivating. The research included fifth and second graders, 65
students from Islamia model public school KTS. We assumed that primary school
students are partially motivated to learn. The results lead us to conclude that the
students believe they can achieve their goals by self-efficacy. They have the high
level of self-perception of competences. Self-worth, i.e. students’ views of their own
qualities, is least valued. The results show the high level of value of academic
achievements. Social goals are also important to students. Nonconformity is not
satisfactorily developed. The gender, grade and school achievement differences in
students’ motivation to learn. The results show that not all teaching strategies are
equally motivating. A large percentage of students are indifferent to certain teaching
strategies.
11- How do you feel about this practice? What have you learnt?

I learn that the motivation is a very important factor in motivation of students

specially at primary level because at this stage students are very much bare to learn
anything.

12- What has it added to your professional skills as a teacher?

It increases quality of my teaching method because motivation manner an exchange

inside the teaching manner, substances, assignments or student products to help a
pupil to acquire the predicted learning results. Expected to gain knowledge of final
results way the getting to know effects regular with the curriculum.

13- List the works you cited in your project

I. Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A
motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x
II. Bransford, J., Derry, S., Berliner, D., Hammerness, K., & Beckett, K.L.
(2005). Theories of learning and their roles in teaching. In L. Darling-
Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp.
40-87). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
III. Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher
professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-967
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
IV. Collie, R.J., & Martin, A.J. (2015). Teachers’ Motivation: Examining Links
with Principal Support, Teachers’ Psychological Functioning, and Students’
Achievement. Manuscript submitted for publication.
V. Collie, R.J., Perry, N.E., & Martin, A.J. (2015). School context and
educational system factors impacting educator stress. Manuscript submitted
for publication.
VI. Corno, L. (2008). On teaching adaptively. Educational Psychologist, 43(3),
161-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520802178466
VII. Cullen, K., Edwards, B., Casper, W. C., & Gue, K. (2014). Employees'
motivation and perceptions of change-related uncertainty: Implications for
perceived organizational support, job satisfaction, and performance. Journal of
Business and Psychology, 29(2), 269-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-
013-9312-y
VIII. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development
within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In
 R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85-110).
New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
IX. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York,
NY: Random House. Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages:
Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to
educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 967-983.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.007
X. Heckhausen, J. (1999). Developmental regulation in adulthood: Age-
normative and sociostructural constraints as adaptive challenges. New York,
NY: Cambridge University Press.
XI. Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995). A life-span theory of control.
Psychological Review, 102(2), 284-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-
295X.102.2.284
XII. Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of
life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017668
XIII. Howard, S., & Johnson, B. (2000). Resilient and non-resilient behavior in
adolescents. In A. Graycar (Ed.), Trends and issues in crime and criminal
justice series (pp. 1–6). Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia:
Australian Institute of Criminology.
XIV. Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Teachers' relatedness
with students: An underemphasized component of teachers' basic
psychological needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 150-165.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026253
XV. Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A.
(2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality
and student development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 805-
820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
XVI. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New
York, NY: Springer.
XVII. Liem, G. A. D., & Martin, A. J. (2015). Young people’s responses to
environmental issues: Exploring the roles of motivation and personality.
Personality and Individua Differences, 79, 91-97.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.003
XVIII. Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Price, A., & McConney, A. (2012). “Don’t
sweat the small stuff:” understanding teacher resilience at the chalkface.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 357-367.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.11.001
XIX. Martin, A. J. (2013). Academic buoyancy and academic resilience: Exploring
‘everyday’ and ‘classic’ resilience in the face of academic adversity. School
Psychology International, 34(5), 488-500.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143034312472759
XX. Martin, A. J., Nejad, H. G., Colmar, S. H., & Liem, G. A. D. (2013).
Motivation: How students’ responses to uncertainty and novelty predict their
 academic and non-academic outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology,
105(3), 728-746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0032794
XXI. Martin, A. J., Nejad, H. G., Colmar, S., & Liem, G. A. D. (2012). Motivation:
Conceptual and empirical perspectives on responses to change, novelty and
uncertainty. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 22(1), 58-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2012.8
XXII. Martin, A. J., Nejad, H., Colmar, S., Liem, G. A. D., & Collie, R. J. (2015).
The role of motivation in promoting control and reducing failure dynamics: A
mediation model. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 36-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.02.004
XXIII. O'Connell, D. J., McNeely, E., & Hall, D. T. (2008). Unpacking personal
motivation at work. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(3),
248-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071791907311005
XXIV. Parsons, S. A. (2012). Adaptive teaching in literacy instruction: Case studies
of two teachers. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(2), 149-170.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12440261
XXV. Parsons, S., Williams, B., Burrowbridge, S., & Mauk, G. (2012). The case for
motivation as an aspect of reading teacher effectiveness. Voices from the
Middle, 19(1), 19-23.
XXVI. Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., &
Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for
academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784-793.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797615571017
XXVII. Ployhart, R. Bliese, P. D. (2006). Individual motivation (I-ADAPT) theory:
Conceptualizing the antecedents, consequences, and measurement of
individual differences in motivation. Advances in Human Performance and
Cognitive Engineering Research, 6, 3-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1479-
3601(05)06001-7
XXVIII. Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of
explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of
Educational Research, 85(3), 430-471.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949
XXIX. Tomasik, M., Silbereisen, R., & Heckhausen, J. (2010). Is it adaptive to
disengage from demands of social change? Adjustment to developmental
barriers in opportunity-deprived regions. Motivation and Emotion, 34(4), 384-
398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11031-010-9177-6
XXX. Vaughn, M., & Parsons, S. A. (2013). Adaptive teachers as innovators:
Instructional adaptations opening spaces for enhanced literacy learning.
Language Arts, 91(2), 81-93.

14- Name of the school

Islamia model public school KTS