Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ICRA
Industry Comment
www.icraindia.com
Contacts:
Dr. Soumya K. Ghosh Manager
Rajeev Thakur Research Head
Amul Gogna Executive Director
Copyright, ICRA Limited, 26 Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi –110 001
None of the information contained in this publication may be copied, otherwise reproduced,
repackaged, further transmitted, disseminated, redistributed, or resold, or stored for subsequent
use for any such purpose, in whole or in part, in any form or manner or by means whatsoever, by
any person without ICRA’s prior written permission.
All information contained herein has been obtained by ICRA from sources believed by it to be
accurate and reasonable. Although reasonable care has been taken to ensure that the information
herein is true, such information is provided ‘as is’ without any warranty of any kind, and ICRA in
particular, makes no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness
or completeness of any such information. All information contained herein must be construed
solely as statements of opinion and ICRA shall not be liable for any losses incurred by users from
any use of this publication or its contents.
In the course of work, ICRA may have received information from companies being ar ted or
graded. However, this publication does not contain any confidential information obtained by ICRA
in the process of rating or grading. This publication contains data/information available only in the
public domain or available through secondary sources.
Opinions expressed in this publication are not an indication of the prospective rating/grading for
any instruments to be issued by any of the companies concerned.
Table of Contents
TRENDS IN CAPACITY...................................................................................................................................13
OUTLOOK.............................................................................................................................................................15
ITES INDUSTRY
Definition
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) is defined as the delegation of ownership,
administration and operation of a business process or processes to a third party, or external
service provider. The external service provider, in turn, administers and manages the process
or processes in compliance with some measurable performance metrics.
The terms Information Technology Enabled Services (ITES) and BPO are often used
interchangeably. However, strictly speaking, ITES involves outsourcing of business processes
that can only be combined with Information Technology (IT). Such services are delivered
through a telecommunication or data network or other electronic media. ITES is therefore a
subset of BPO as Exhibit 1 shows.
ITES
Non-ITES
Compiled by INGRES
The business processes of a company may be broadly classified as ITES and Non-ITES
processes. These processes may be further sub-grouped into the following categories:
• Critical non-core processes: These processes are important to a company but are not
competitive differentiators. Critical non -core processes may directly link the company
with suppliers (supply chain management) or with customers (sales, marketing and
customer care), and also involve support functions like Accounting and Human
Resource (HR) administration. Some of the critical non-core processes may be
outsourced to BPO providers who in turn are likely to invest in them, thus raising their
own importance with the outsourcing company.
ICRA believes the Indian ITBP industry is currently in the fourth phase of growth (refer bullet
below), with several Indian companies acquiring new businesses abroad.
• First Phase of Evolution: In the first phase of evolution of the ITBP industry in India,
multinational corporations (MNCs) established a plethora of captive units in the
country for customer support and transaction processing. These included American
Express (in 1993), British Airways (in 1996) and General Electric (in 1998).
• Second Phase of Evolution: In the second phase, ITES units were set up in India by
MNCs (for outsourcing activities), non-resident Indians (NRIs), Indian independents,
and Indian subsidiaries. Established software services ventured into the ITBP
business in 2002 by establishing subsidiaries.
• Third Phase of Evolution: The third phase of evolution of the ITBP industry in India
has been characterised by the increasing trend towards geographical dispersion of
activities; mergers & acquisitions (M&As) have also taken place within the industry in
this phase (refer Table 1).
Table 1
M&As in the Indian ITBP Industry
Company Acquirer Seller* Remarks
Customer ICICI Onesource Promoters (100%) Deal at US$19.3 million
Asset
EXL Service Oakhill Partners Conseco Inc, USA NA
IbackOffice Optimus (Polaris) Global Technology Ventures NA
Intelenet Household Credit Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Company valued at US$100
Housing Development Finance million
Corporation (HDFC)
Progeon Citigroup Infosys (20%) Company valued at US$100
million
Spectramind Wipro Chrysalis, HDFC (100%) Deal at US$100 million
WNS Warburg Pincus British Airways (70%) NA
*Figures within parentheses indicate the percentage of stake acquired by the buyer. NA: not available
Compiled by INGRES
• Fourth Phase of Evolution: In the current and fourth phase of evolution of the ITBP
industry in India there is an increasing trend towards Indian companies acquiring small- to
medium-size businesses in overseas locations. These foreign acquisitions mark a
contrast to the practice of foreign MNCs setting up BPO units in India to take advantage
of the lower costs here. Also, these acquisitions are probably in the nature of a market
entry strategy.
Table 2
Acquisitions by Indian Players in the ITBP industry
Company Acquirer Seller (and stake) Remarks
Aegis Communication Group, Essar Aegis (40%) Aegis is a US$150 million
US listed company
Apollo Contact Centre of HCL British Telecom HCL has paid US$11.5 million
British Telecom, Northern Technologies (90%) to acquire a 90% stake and is
Ireland expected to acquire the
remaining 10% after three
years for US$1.2 million.
Upstream, USA Godrej Upstream, USA NA
White Label LLC, USA Datamatics White Label LLC Deal worth US$10 million
Compiled by INGRES
Table 3
Indian ITBP Industry in FY2004
FY2002 $ mn FY2003 FY2004
Employees Revenues Employees Revenues Employees Revenues
Customer Care 30000 400 54000 700 95000 1200
Finance 15000 300 21000 450 40000 820
HR 1500 30 1600 35 3500 90
Payment 7000 110 9500 190 21000 430
Services
Administration 14000 185 25000 350 40000 540
Content 39000 450 60000 650 46000 520
Development
Total 106500 1475 171100 2375 245500 3600
Compiled by INGRES
FY2002 FY2004
Content
Development
Content Administration 15%
Development Customer Care
15% Customer Care
31% 27%
33%
HR
2%
The total number of people employed in the ITBP business in India in FY2004 was 0.24 mn .
In FY2003, the size of the employment in the Indian ITBP industry is estimated at around 0.17
mn.
3000 60
2000 40
1000 20
0 0
Compiled by INGRES
Even as MNCs with existing Indian operations have set up BPO facilities in the country, there
are others that have hitherto no Indian operations but have now established captive BPO
facilities in India. In fact, since 2000, a large number of Fortune 500 corporations have set up
bases in India and gradually scaled up their operations.
Capti ve BPO units in India have several advantages (both existing and potential), some of
which are discussed here:
• The captive units have guaranteed markets and are well equipped to carry out even
value-added services. For instance, General Electric’s Indian operations have moved up
the value chain and have now added employees for actuarial support, data modelling and
portfolio risk management.
• A potential advantage is that with the scope of BPO services expanding, the MNC captive
players in India may offer their services in the open market. Already, some of the largest
BPO entities are planning to offer services to external customers. If this practice takes
root, captive MNC units can turn into profit centres from the cost centres that they are
now.
M N C Outsourcers
The MNC players that are not captive include those that are pure outsourcers or specialists.
MNC outsourcers include entities like Convergys that have enormous domain knowledge,
which makes them significant players in the Indian market. In 2001, Convergys launched its
Indian operations in Delhi, and by April 2003, this unit was employing over 3,000 persons.
Convergys is now building a second facility in Bangalore, which will employ over 3,000
persons. It is likely that faced with cost pressures, MNC outsourcers would transfer more of
their activities offshore so as to remain cost competitive.
The MNC non-captive players include multinationals that can perform labour-intensive
speciality services. Such services are wide-ranging and are based on domain expertise.
Examples of this type of work include medical transcription, map digitisation, cartoon
animation, and document conversion. Individually, these activities have limited employment
potential, but in aggregate their significance is much greater. For instance, there are close to
0.3 mn medical transcriptionists currently in US and this job may be outsourced from India.
Indian Players
In addition to MNC players, there are a host of Indian players operating in the BPO market.
These include venture capital funded BPO entities, Indian specialists, Indian IT Industry
subsidiaries, Indian non-IT Industry subsidiaries, and Indian players in the financial sector.
The venture capital funded BPO entities came up during the dotcom boom, seeking to provide
back-office services to US Internet firms. However, these firms reworked their corporate
strategies since the end of the brief boom in 2000. Nevertheless, the venture capital funded
BPO entities, by and large, remain dependent on large MNCs for business and these entities
have been forced to include BOT provisions in their contract. Also, the dependence on single
MNCs has made these BPO entities vulnerable to cyclical downturns in the businesses of the
MNCs. For instance, EXL Service was deriving a significant percentage of its business from
US insurance firm Conseco, but with the latter’s collapse, EXL has been forced to revise its
strategy.
Indian specialists are also specialising in areas like medical transcription and map digitisation.
Moreover, these specialists are well equipped for software development (Kale Consultants),
which facilitates their BPO operations.
An important group of Indian players in the BPO market includes subsidiaries of Indian IT
majors. Such majors include companies like Wipro, Infosys, HCL, Satyam and TCS.
However, some of these companies have decided to enter the BPO market in a different way.
While Infosys and Satyam have established dedicated BPO subsidiaries, others like TCS
have entered the BPO market through joint ventures, even as Wipro and HCL have entered
the business through acquisitions.
The segment of Indian non-IT industry subsidiaries includes entities established by large
Indian business conglomerates. This segment is the latest in the Indian BPO market (for
example, ICICI Onesource, Jindal Transworld and so on).
In the financial sector, a number of banks have now decided to outsource their business to
domestic BPO entities. For instance, State Bank of India (SBI) has recently announced that it
will outsource the task of networking 1,500 of its branches and around 3,000 automated teller
machines (ATMs) in over 49 cities to Datacraft India. Similarly, Bank of India, HDFC Bank,
and ICICI Bank have decided to outsource their non -core activities. These apart, players like
Carretek are offering services to offshore companies.
Table 5
Select Players in the Indian BPO Market
Players Service Lines (Illustrative) Outsourced Employment Size
(nos).
MNC Captives AMEX, Hongkong and Data Management, Accounting, No 250- 12,000
Shanghai Banking Back Office, Administration, HR,
Corporation HSBC Finance, Customer Care,
Canon , GE Capital, JP Processing and Documentation
Morgan Chase, Standard
Chartered, World Bank
MNC Captives (New) AOL, Axa, Dell, Fidelity, Data Management, Accounting, No 500- 3000
Ford Business Service Back Office, Administration, HR,
Finance, Customer Care,
Processing and Documentation
MNC Outsourcers Convergys, Sitel, Customer Care, HR Services, Yes 500- 2000
Teleperformance Database Management and
Accounting
MNC Specialists TeleAtlas, eBrookers, Geographical Information System Yes 500- 2000
Kampsax (GIS), Medical Transcription and
Publishing
NRI- Funded Entities eFunds, Genisys, General Outsourcing, Medical Yes 500- 2000
Heartland, Max Transcription and Publishing
Healthscribe, Techbooks
Indian Specialists 247 Customer, Daksh, GIS, Customer Care, HR Yes 500- 2000
Epicentre, EXL, First Ring, Services, Database
iSeva, Infowavz, Msource, Management, Publishing, Travel
Kale, Tracmail, and Accounting
Transworks, Vcustomer,
WNS
Indian IT Subsidiaries Progeon, Wipro Banking, Financial Services, Yes 500- 5000
Spectramind, HCL, BPO, Securities & Brokerage,
TCS Insurance, Finance & Accounting,
and Telecommunications
Indian Non- IT Subsidiaries ICICI Onesource, NA Yes 500- 2000
Ienergizer, Jindal
Transworld, Zenta
Indian Financial Datacraft, India Switch Banking Yes NA
Specialists
Compiled by INGRES
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
• Oak Hill Capital Partners, a $1.6 -billion private equity firm and General Atlantic have
agreed to pay about $500 million for 60% of General Electric's business-processing
operations in India. The transaction, values GECIS at $800 million. GE will retain 40%
stake in GECIS and use the proceeds of 60% stake sale to fund growth. Both
General Atlantic Partner and Oak Hill are equal partners in this transaction. GECIS
will continue to serve GE under a multi-layer contract and the current GECIS global
management team would also be retained. About 1,000 GECIS employees will also
remain with GE.
Even though the captive BPO units in India have potential advantages (in terms of
guaranteed markets) this particular move by GE has to be viewed in the context of
the current scope of BPO services. In effect, with BPO services expanding to more
value-added services and given that GECIS has already expertise in areas like
actuarial support, data modelling and portfolio risk management, GECIS after this
move may now offer its services in the open market. This will enable it to charge a
higher premium than the existing one.
• The controversy over the taxation of business process outsourcing units in India has
been resolved with the Income -Tax department clarifying that tax would be attributed
to a foreign company only if its dependent BPO outfit in India was a "permanent
KEY ISSUES
Declining revenue realisations in specific segments
There was a decline in revenue realisation per employee for specific segments like finance
and HR in FY2004.
Table 6
Revenue Realisation per Employee (in US$)
FY2002 FY2003 FY2004
Customer Care 13333 12462 12632
Finance 20000 21250 20500
HR 20000 21429 20000
Payment Services 15714 19091 20476
Administration 13214 12400 13500
Content Development 11538 10568 11304
Total 13850 13735 14582
Compiled by INGRES
Cost Competitiveness
For an overseas business corporation, the primary reason for relocating business to an
offshore location like India is typically cost saving. However, in achieving this saving, the
corporation also has to factor in the parameters of quality and productivity, which is usually
done through monitoring against some defined performance metrics. In this section, the
issues of cost savings, quality and productivity are taken up.
The Indian ITBP industry is competitive as far as cost is concerned. The costs of significantly
qualified and competent labour in India are among the lowest in the world. Such savings may
be discussed under the following heads.
Gross savings: Gross savings may be defined as the savings against salary benefits and
overhead costs. For instance, according to industry estimates labour costs for a call centre in
the US are around US$10/hour, as against US$1.5/hour in India. If the centre operates in two
shifts a day, the total labour costs in the US would be around US$57,600 a year, as against
US$8,640 a year in India. This translates into a cost saving of around 85% purely on labour.
Alternatively, gross savings may also be defined in terms of the overall savings in a particular
year (the total savings in costs after accounting for labour and all other costs like general and
administrative expenses, property rentals, telecom, depreciation and so on: ICRA estimates,
that on an average these costs are higher by 5-10% in India). Thus, the total savings in the
above case could be as much as 75-80%.
Net savings: Net savings are the savings projected over the duration of the contract, taking
into account the up -front investment in selecting a provider, setting up the offshore centre,
effecting knowledge transfer, and so on.
BPO Backlash
• A bill entitled “The United States Workers Protection Act” has been introduced CY2004 in
the United States Senate by Democrat, Christopher Dodd of Connecticut. The bill seeks
to prohibit taxpayer’s money from being used to outsource or take offshore those jobs
formerly done in the U.S. The legislation focuses on at least three areas of government
contracting: privatising of federal work, federal procurement of goods and services and
state procurement using federal funding. Under the Bill, the states will not be eligible to
receive federal money unless they certify every year that this will n ot be going offshore.
• Nearly 50 members of the US House of Representatives have announced that they are
introducing a bill entitled “The Defending American Jobs Act ” that would deny American
companies Federal financing and loan guarantees if they shift the jobs overseas.
• A bill entitled “ Jobs for America Act” has been introduced in the United States Senate by
Tom Daschle in CY2004. The bill requires companies that plans to lay off 15 or more
workers and send those jobs overseas to disclose how many jobs are affected, where the
jobs are going and why they are being offshored. Apart from giving workers three months’
notice, the companies will be required to notify federal and state agencies responsible for
helping laid-off workers. The bill also calls on the Department of Labour to compile
statistics of offshored jobs and report it annually to US Congress.
However, these bills are unlikely to pose a serious threat to the Indian BPO market over the
short to medium term. In particular, the bill refers to “state government business getting
outsourced”, keeping all private sector businesses outside its purview. The bill also avoids
challenging the US government's right to give projects to contractors. But it provides that
contracts cannot be subcontracted out by the outsourcing mechanism to India or other
countries like China, Russia to cut costs.
According to ICRA estimates, the size of the US BPO market was $507 billion in 2003, of
which the size of the state government BPO businesses accounted for $36.7 bn (US
government and US defence department) – that works out to around 7.2% of the total market.
However, given that only 1.3% of such BPO businesses were offshored, the total size of the
offshore BPO market for state government jobs was only $513 million in 2003. In other
words, the US bills would at best choke up only $513 million of the offshore BPO business
(the Indian BPO market is estimated at $3600 million in FY2004) that would have come to
India, or other low-cost destinations.
• The GOI has allowed complete tax exemption under section 10A and 10B and partial
tax exemption under section 80HHE. Sections 10A & 10B allows tax incentives for
software development centres located in “Software Technology Parks (STP)” or
“Export Processing Zones” or which are 100% “Export Oriented Undertakings”.
Section 80HHE allows for tax exemption in respect of profits of export of computer
software. However, the Finance Act 2003 specifies a progressive decline in the tax
exemption limit over the next 10 years, beginning April 1, 2003.
• The GOI has promoted several STP in several locations across India. Units located in
STP enjoy the benefits of single-window clearance fo r all regulatory compliance
issues. This apart, the units enjoy duty free imports of professional equipment
(customs duty is waived) and duty free purchases (excise duty is waived).
• The GOI allows for 100% FDI equity in ITBP companies.
• Liberalisation of the telecom sector allowing private players in International Long
Distance (ILD), National Long Distance (NLD) and leased line services.
• This apart, various state governments have introduced initiatives to encourage
investments in the ITBP sector. For instance, the states of Andhra Pradesh, Tamil
Nadu and Maharashtra have initiated steps to ensure uninterrupted power supply.
Trends in Capacity
The Indian ITBP industry has witnessed a significant increase in capacity. The number of
seats has increased from 140,000 at the end of March 2003, to a projected 210,000 in March
2004. Most of this increase has been from Indian vendors and captive units. The share of
captive units is between 65-70% and is expected to grow even further.
Most of these third-party vendors made investments in improving infrastructure and quality,
training and re-skilling staff, expanding service portfolio, marketing, and recruiting technical
personnel. The Indian third-party vendors also included IT service companies expanding their
offerings to include ITBP services by creating own units or entering into joint ventures (refer
Table 7).
Table 7
Strategies of Indian IT Firms to Enter BPO Business
Firm Strategy Employees Location
(nos.)
Tata Consultancy Joint venture with HDFC— Intelenet 900 Mumbai
Services
Infosys Established a subsidiary—Progeon 3,000 Bangalore
Wipro Acquired Spectramind in 2002 for US$93 3,200 Delhi
mn Mumbai
HCL Technologies NI Acquired 90% in BPO division of British 2,500 Delhi,
Telecom Chennai
Satyam Established a subsidiary —Serwiz Not Available Hyderabad
Compiled by INGRES
However, on the downside, currently 90% of India’s export market are to USA and UK and the
US market is likely to grow slowly relative to other regions in the medium-term. As a result,
Indian ITES companies will also need to diversify the export market to be able to maintain the
current high growth trajectory.
Spectramind and Progeon have witnessed an increase in revenue growth rates (compared to
the previous quarter) for the quarter ended December 2004.
Revenue of Wipro-Spectramind
(Rs. mn)
Q3FY2005 Q2FY2005 Q1FY2005 Q4FY2004 Q3FY2004 Q2FY2004 Q1FY2004
Total revenue (Rs mn) 1794 1649 1374 1365 1219 958 785
Q- o-Q growth rate (%) 9 20 1 12 27 22 19
Y-o-Y growth rate (%) 47 72 75 107 116 217
Compiled by INGRES
Revenue of Progeon
($ mn)
Q3FY2005 Q2FY2005 Q1FY2005* Q4FY2004* Q3FY2004 Q2FY2004 Q1FY2004
Total revenue 11.9 9.1 7.2 5.8 4.78 3.72 2.74
Q- o-Q growth rate (%) 32 26 25 21 28 36
Y-o-Y growth rate (%) 151 145 163 168 181 807
*As compiled from reports
Compiled by INGRES
• Spectramind has witnessed a marginal detoriation in average revenue per employee for
the quarter ended Q3FY2005. However, for Progeon there was an increase.
As far as the profit margins are concerned, it may be said that the profit margins in the
BPO business of the software companies are low when compared to the margins from
the software business. However, the revenue from BPO business accounts for not more
than 10% of their overall revenue. For instance, in the case of Wipro-Spectramind, the
revenue from the BPO segment is less than 10% of the revenue, whereas the operating
margin in the BPO segment is around 15% as against the total operating margin of more
than 25%. The lower profit margins in the BPO businesses of these software companies
may be attributed to the competitive nature of the business and the relatively recent
vintage of their BPO operations.
Outlook
The Indian ITBP industry is poised for growth over the medium term. ICRA expects the size of
the domestic ITBP industry to touch Rs. 591 bn (US$12 bn) by 2006. ICRA also expects the
Indian ITBP industry to employ 0.4 mn people by 2006. Such likely growth rates in the Indian
ITBP industry would be enabled by the abundance of low-cost significantly qualified labour in
the country, improvements in the domestic telecommunications infrastructure, and India’s
brand image in the IT market. The high growth projections are also based on the expectation
that Government policy would continue to be congenial (incentives were announced in 2002
for the ITBP industry).
Within the Indian ITBP industry, ICRA expects both a vertical movement (offering more critical
services in the same domain) and a horizontal one (expanding service portfolio by moving
into sophisticated areas like accounting), which in turn would improve realisations. Already,
some offshoring corporations are now outsourcing entire technology operations or business
processes, including logistics, customer relationship management, and finance to Indian ITBP
service providers. In human resources, outsourcing was initially restricted to pension plans
and payroll, but now covers even recruitment and performance management. For ITBP
service providers, moving up the value chain is also critical, given that attrition rates in the
industry are on an average higher in low value-added segments (in call centres) as compared
to higher value-added segments (engineering).
However, as the global ITBP industry grows rapidly, the developed nations (the largest
outsourcers) would probably have to suffer some amount of local job loss, the extent of which
is uncertain as of now. Independent estimates suggest that 2 mn jobs from the largest 100
global financial institutions will be moved to India by 2008 (of which 851,000 jobs will be from
the US). It is to be seen how political and economic considerations interact in influe ncing the
growth of the ITBP industry in the near future.