Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
In this, the final article in the series on carotenoids, supplements are of little or no value in preventing
Susan Taylor Mayne has presented a balanced review cardiovascular disease and the major cancers occur-
of the potential role of beta-carotene and other carote- ring in well-nourished populations, and may actually
noids in human health and disease. Much of the data increase, rather than reduce, lung cancer incidence
indicating a beneficial effect of dietary carotenoids is in smokers. As a consequence of these findings, some
derived from epidemiological studies in which a lower of the ongoing trials of beta-carotene and disease
risk of a variety of chronic diseases including various prevention have been terminated or have dropped
cancers, cardiovascular disease, age-related macular beta-carotene from their interventions. Researchers
degeneration, and cataracts is correlated with the die- should now seek explanations for the apparently
tary conSUm[)tiOn of fruits and vegetables rich in ca- discordant findings of observational studies vs. inter-
rotenoids. However, to determine whether a specific vention trials. The most pressing research issues
compound (or compounds) of fruits and vegetables is include studies of interactions of carotenoids with
beneficial, human intervention studies, using either themselves and with other phytochemicals and
single components or mixtures, must be conducted. mechanistic studies of the actions of beta-carotene
These intervention studies have focused on beta-caro- in lung carcinogenesis and cardiovascular disease.
tene as the potential protective carotenoid. Somewhat Paradoxically, the finding that lung carcinogenesis
surprisingly, the results of the intervention studies and cardiovascular disease can be enhanced by sup-
through 1995 did not indicate any protective action of plemental beta-carotene may ultimately lead to a
supplementary beta-carotene with respect to cancer clearer understanding of the role of diet in the
prevention. In fact, the ATBC study from Finland re- etiology and prevention of these diseases. The con-
ported a negative effect of beta-carotene supplementa- clusion that major public health benefits could be
tion with respect to the incidence of lung cancer in achieved by increasing consumption of carotenoid-
smokers. Since then, two other major studies in the rich fruits and vegetables still appears to stand;
United States have shown either no effect or a negative however, the pharmacological use of supplemental
effect on chronic diseases. In concluding, the author beta-carotene for the prevention of cardiovascular
supports an increased consumption of fruits and vege- disease and lung cancer, particularly in smokers, can
tables and the avoidance of supplementary beta-caro- no longer be recommended.-Mayne, S. T. Beta-
tene for smokers. Her recommendations are timely. carotene, carotenoids, and disease prevention in
humans. FASEBJ. 10, 690-701 (1996)
-Norman I Krinsky, Coordinating Editor
Key Words: cancer prevention ‘cardiovascular disease
ABSTRACT A growing body of literature exists
regarding the effects of beta-carotene and other
Beta-carotene is one of a number of naturally occurring
carotenoids on chronic diseases in humans. This
compounds called carotenoids. More than 600 naturally
article reviews and critically evaluates this literature
occurring carotenoids have been identified, approximately
and identifies areas for further research. This review
50 of which have vitamin A activity (1). Carotenoids are
is restricted to studies in humans, with a major
widespread in plants and in photosynthetic bacteria,
emphasis on the most recent literature in the area of where they serve two essential functions: as accessory
carotenoids and selected cancers. Effects of carote-
pigments in photosynthesis and in photoprotection. These
noids on cardiovascular diseases, photosensitivity two functions are a consequence of the conjugated
diseases, cataracts, and age-related macular degen- polyene structure of carotenoids, which allows the mole-
eration are also discussed briefly. Numerous obser-
vational studies have found that people who ingest
more carotenoids in their diets have a reduced risk tAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Mayne, at: De-
of several chronic diseases. However, intervention partment of Epidemiology and Public Health, 60 College St., P.O. Box
trials of supplemental beta-carotene indicate that 208034, New Haven, CT 06520-8034, USA.
Tumor site Total n n-Carotene dose Relative risk (95% Cl)” Reference
Lung 29,133 20 mg/day 1.18 (1.03-1.36) 17
Lung 18,314 30 mg/day + 25,000 LU retinol/day 1.28 (1.04-1.57) CARETb
Esophagus/stomach 29,584 15 mg/day + 30 mg vitamin E + 50 .tg Selenium 0.79 (0.64-0.99) Stomach 26
0.96 (0.78-1.18) Esophagus
Esophagus/stomach 3,318 15 mg/day + multivitamin/multimineral 1.18 (0.76-1.85) Stomach 27
0.84 (0.54-1.29) Esophagus
Skin (nonmelanoma) 1805 50 mg/day 1.05 (0.91-1.22) 28
Total cancer 22,071 50 mg/every other day Not significantL Physicians’
Health Studyh
“Risk for site-specific cancer incidence (ATBC, CARET, Greenberg) or mortality (Blot, Li). tResults fmm NIH press release 1/18/96.
ing more lung cancer, not less, consistent with the results of human intervention trials using intermediate markers of oral
the Finnish trial. Overall, lung cancer incidence was in- carcinogenesis strongly suggest that beta-carotene plays a
creased by 28% in the supplemented subjects (RR = 1.28; protective role in the prevention of cancers of the oral cavity,
95% CI=1.04-1.57) and total mortality was also increased pharynx, and larynx (20). The etiology of these cancers, also
(RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33). Although the P value for known as head and neck cancers, is thought to be multifacto-
the lung cancer increase (P0.032) is less than the conven- rial. Well-characterized risk factors include tobacco and al-
tional P value of 0.05, it cannot be concluded that this trial cohol exposures. A recent case-control study of oral cancer
provided statistically significant evidence of harm. This is from northern Italy attempted to estimate the relative contri-
because trials with interim analyses must have more strin- bution of beta-carotene intake, alcohol, and tobacco expo-
gent nominal significance levels for each repeated look at the sures to this cancer (21). In this study, smoking accounted
data, such that the overall significance level is kept at for 81-87% of oral cancer in males and 42-47% in females;
P0.05 (18). In other words, if investigators analyzed the alcohol explained about 60% of male cases vs. 15% of fe-
data often enough in a large trial one would expect to get P < male cases, and low beta-carotene intake accounted for 25%
0.05 eventually, regardless of whether there is a genuine of cases in males vs. 17% in females. Even though this study
treatment difference (18). provides new information regarding the relative importance
Major findings of one additional trial, the Physicians’ of diet in the etiology of these cancers, the calculated attrib-
Health Study of supplemental beta-carotene vs. placebo in utable risk for low beta-carotene intake should be inter-
22,071 male U.S. physicians, were also released at the same preted cautiously, as the beta-carotene index was derived
press conference. Dr. Charles Hennekens, lead investigator from a few selected indicator foods rather than from an analy-
of the Physicians’ Health Study, announced that there was no sis of the whole diet. Thus, some misclassification of intake is
significant effect-positive or negative-of 12 years of sup- likely.
plementation of beta-carotene (50 mg every other day) on Another recent study of relevance to the issue of ca-
cancer or cardiovascular disease. The apparent lack of an rotenoids and head and neck cancer risk is a nested
effect of long-term supplementation of beta-carotene on lung case-control study of serum micronutrients and sub-
cancer incidence in this cohort is noteworthy. Nonetheless, sequent risk of oral and pharyngeal cancer (22). Blood
these negative results should not be overinterpreted as only samples were collected and stored in 1974 from a cohort
11% of the cohort were current smokers at entry. of 25,802 adults in Maryland. During the next 15 years,
In contrast to these findings are results of an esophageal 28 individuals developed oral or pharyngeal cancer. Se-
and gastric cancer prevention trial in China (discussed be- rum analyses indicated that prediagnostic serum levels of
low). This trial had limited statistical power for lung cancer all the major individual carotenoids, and particularly
with only 31 total lung cancer deaths (19). However, the beta-carotene, were lower among the case group than
relative risk of death from lung cancer was 0.55 (95% among controls selected from the same cohort. Adjust-
CIO.26-1.14) among those receiving the combination of ment for smoking, which is known to be associated with
beta-carotene, alpha-tocopherol, and selenium. The smok- decreased serum carotenoid levels, attenuated the protec-
ing prevalence, including individuals who had ever smoked tive association slightly. The unadjusted and adjusted
cigarettes for6 or more months, was 30% in this study popu- relative odds of oral/pharyngeal cancer comparing the up-
lation. Possible reasons for the discrepant results of the per tertile of serum beta-carotene concentrations vs. the
CARET, ATBC, Physicians’ and Chinese trials are dis- lower tertile were 0.50 and 0.69, respectively.
cussed below (see “Carotenoids and Cancer: Overall Assess- These and other observational studies strongly suggest
ment”). that fruits and vegetables have cancer inhibitory proper-
ties for mouth and throat cancers. Human intervention
Oral, pharynx, and larynx trials using beta-carotene in the prevention and/or rever-
sal of oral micronuclei and oral leukoplakia (precancer-
As reviewed elsewhere, epidemiologic studies of diet and ous changes) lend further credence to the hypothesis that
serum, studies using the hamster buccal pouch model, and beta-carotene is at least one of the agents responsible for
“Complete response plus partial response. bplaceba_contmlled studies. Clinical response in those patients who did not reduce tobacco use dunng 9 month
intervention (clinical response 90% in those who took supplements and reduced tobacco use).
Breast study (30), dietary change after diagnosis was not meas-
ured, and further research is needed to better understand
Even though most epidemiological studies of carotenoids whether increasing consumption of carotenoid-rich fruits
and human cancer have investigated a possible preven- and vegetables after cancer diagnosis affects survival.
tive role of these compounds, a relatively new research
area concerns prognostic and potentially therapeutic ef- Prostate
fects of carotenoid-rich diets. Ingram (30) interviewed
women with breast cancer 3 months after surgery, and Although several human studies have observed a direct
found that women with breast cancer who reported con- association between retinol intake and risk of prostate
suming more beta-carotene in their diets up until the cancer (32), studies of dietary beta-carotene and prostate
time of breast cancer diagnosis had a significant improve- cancer have shown mixed results. Data regarding carote-
ment in survival. More specifically, in the tertile of noids other than beta-carotene and prostate cancer risk
women who consumed the highest beta-carotene levels, are limited; however, one recent study evaluated associa-
only one woman died from breast cancer. In contrast, 8 tions between dietary beta-carotene, alpha-carotene,
women in the intermediate consumption group and 12 lutein, lycopene, and beta-cryptoxanthin and prostate
women in the lowest consumption group died from their cancer risk (33). The study was a prospective cohort
disease over a 6-year follow-up period. Dietary data were study of participants in the Health Professionals Follow-
not reassessed during the follow-up period; therefore, it is up Study, 812 of whom were diagnosed with prostate can-
unclear if diet at the time of diagnosis was important or cer during the 6-year follow-up. Intake of tomato-based
whether dietary changes made postdiagnosis affected sur- foods (tomato sauce, tomatoes, and pizza, but not tomato
vival in women with breast cancer. Also, although these juice) and the carotenoid lycopene, which is found pre-
results are intriguing, estimates were not adjusted for dominantly in tomato products, was associated with sig-
other known prognostic factors such as the stage of the nificantly lower prostate cancer risk.
disease at diagnosis. It is possible that women who con-
sumed relatively low levels of dietary carotenoids were Cervical
less health-conscious, and thus more likely to be diag-
nosed with late-stage disease with a correspondingly re- Two additional reports can be added to the body of litera-
duced survival. ture suggesting a role for beta-carotene and carotenoids
Using a different study design, Jam and colleagues in the prevention of cervical cancer. Batieha and col-
(31) studied a cohort of 678 women with breast cancer leagues (34) conducted a nested case-control study, ana-
from the National Breast Screening Study in Canada who lyzing a variety of carotenoids in sera stored from 50
had completed a diet history questionnaire before cancer women who had developed either invasive cervical cancer
diagnosis. Higher intake of saturated fats and lower in- or carcinoma in situ during a 15-year follow-up, and in
take of beta-carotene and vitamin C before diagnosis in- 99 controls pair-matched to the cases. The risk of cervi-
creased the risk of dying of breast cancer. The hazard cal cancer was significantly higher among women with
ratio for the highest quartile of dietary beta-carotene was the lowest prediagnostic serum levels of total carotenoids
0.48 (95% CI=0.23-0.99), with evidence of a significant (0R2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.4), alpha-carotene (0R3.1,
dose-response relationship. Information was available on 95% CI, 1.3-7.6), and beta-carotene (0R3.1; 95%
axillary lymph node status for a subset of cases; the in- CI,1.2-8.1) as compared to women in the upper ter-
clusion of the number of positive lymph nodes (an indica- tiles. Trends were also statistically significant. Mean se-
tor of stage of disease) in multivariate analyses did not rum levels of cryptoxanthin were also lower among cases
substantially alter the risk estimates. As with Ingram’s relative to controls (P0.03).
RESEARCH
REFERENCES
As discussed throughout this article, numerous gaps exist
1. Isler, 0. (1981) Foreword. In Carotenoids a.c Colorants and Vitamin A
in our understanding of the role of carotenoids in disease Precursors (Bauenfcind, J. C., ed) p. xiii, Academic Press, New York
prevention. Observational studies of carotenoids and dis- 2. Dragsled. L. 0., Strobe, M., and Larsen, J. C. (1993) Cancer protective factors
in fruits and vegetables: bioche,,,ical and biological background. Pharmacol.
ease continue to suggest that consumption of carotenoid- Toxicol. 72 (Suppl.) sI l6-s135
rich fruits and vegetables reduces the risk of several 3. Mangels, A. R., Holden, J. M., Beecher, C. R., Forman, M. R., and Lanza,
E. (1993) Carotenoid content of fruits and vegetables: an evaluation of
diseases. However, supplementation with pharmacological analytic data.). Am. Diet. Assoc. 93, 284-296
levels of one single carotenoid, beta-carotene, has not 4. Campbell, D. R., Gross, M. D., Martini, M. C., Crandits, C. A., Slavin, J. 1.,
and Potter, J. D. (1994) Plasma carotenoids as biomarkers of vegetable and
been shown to be of benefit in the prevention of common fruit intake. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers & Prey. 3, 493-500
chronic diseases. Ongoing research should now seek ex- 5. Freedman, L. S. and Schatzkin, A. (1992) Sample size for studying iolerme-
diate endpoints within intervention trials or observational studies. Am. J.
planations for the apparently discordant findings of obser- Epidemiol. 136, 1148-1159
vational studies vs. intervention trials. The most pressing 6. Block, C., Patlerson, B., and Suhar, A. (1992) Fruit, vegetables, and cancer
prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nuir. Cancer 18. 1-29
research issues include studies of interactions of carote- 7. Ziegler. R. C., Mayne, S. T., and Swanson, C. A. (1996) Nutrition and lung
noids with themselves and with other phytochemicals, cancer. Cancer Causes & Control 7, 157-177
8. Alavanja, M. C. R., Brown, C. C., Swanson, C., and Brownson, K. C. (1993)
and mechanistic studies of the actions of beta-carotene in Saturated fat intake and lung cancer risk among nonsmoking women in
carcinogenesis and cardiovascular disease. Paradoxically, Missouri.). Nail. Cancer Inst. 85, 1906-1916
9. Mayne, S. T., Janerich, D. T., Creenwald, P., Chorosi, S., Tucci, C., Zaman,
the disappointing finding of enhancement of lung carcino- M. B., Melamed, M. K., Kiely, M., and McKneally, M. F. (1994) Dietary beta
genesis, and possibly cardiovascular disease, by supple- carotene and lung cancer risk in U.S. nonsmokers. J. Nail. Cancer Inst. 86,
33-38
mental beta-carotene may ultimately lead to a clearer 10. Olson, J. A. (1994) Needs and sources of caroter,oids and vitamin A. Nut,-.
understanding of the role of other dietary factors in the Ret. 52, 67-73
11. Micozzi, M. S., Beecher. C. K.. Taylor. P. R., and Khachik, F. (1990)
etiology and prevention of these common chronic dis- Carotenoid analyses of selected raw and cooked foods associated with a lower
eases. risk for cancer.). Nail. Cancer Inst. 82, 282-285