Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
2
Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda)
• One of the strongest typhoon in the western North Pacific basin
• The strongest landfalling typhoon in the Philippines (Nov. 8, 2013)
• Maximum sustained windspeed at landfall at Tolosa estimated from satellite is 165 knots (305
kph/85 mps) (JTWC, 2013)
• Translational speed of 15-23 knots (28-43 kph)
• Minimum Pressure – 895 hPa
Water level
• Abnormal fluctuation of water
level during the passage of
typhoons
• Sea level anomaly from
astronomical tide time
• Storm Tide Storm Surge
4
Storm Surge Components
• Barometric Tide (Atmospheric Pressure
Gradient Set-up)
• response of the coastal waters to the low
pressure at the center of the storm.
𝛥𝑝
𝜂𝐵 =
𝛾
• Wind Stress Component
• Storm surge is caused primarily by the strong winds
in a tropical storm. The wind stress tide (wind set-
up) is generated by the frictional drag of the wind
blowing over the water
𝑑𝜂𝑤 𝜏𝑠 − 𝜏𝑏
=
𝑑𝑥 𝜌𝑔 ℎ + 𝜂𝑤 5
Factors affecting Storm Surge
• Central Pressure
• Intensity (wind speed)
• Forward Speed
• Size
• Radius of Maximum Wind
• Angle of Approach
• Width and Slope of Shelf
• Local features – concavity of coastlines, bays, rivers, headlands or
islands
6
Goal of this Study
• To investigate the possible maximum storm tide along the coast of
Dagupan City during the passage of selected historical typhoons using
numerical modelling.
• The results of the study will provide a valuable reference for storm
surge awareness and for preliminary planning of storm surge
mitigation strategies in Dagupan City.
7
Methodology
Input Storm Tide Model Products
Tropical Cyclone Information Storm Tide / Storm Surge Map
Bathymetry
Time Series
Tide Information
Hydrodynamic Model integrated
with Typhoon Model
8
Numerical Models
• Typhoon Model: Holland 1980 Typhoon Model
𝐴
− 𝐵 𝑝𝑐 = central pressure
Pressure Profile: 𝑝 = 𝑝𝑐 + 𝑝𝑛 − 𝑝𝑐 𝑒 𝑅𝑖 𝑝𝑛 = ambient pressure
0.5
𝐵 𝑅𝑚𝑤 𝐵 2 2 𝑅𝑚𝑤 = radius of
𝑅𝑚𝑤 1−
𝑅𝑖 2
𝑅𝑖 𝑓 𝑅𝑖 𝑓
Velocity Profile: 𝑉= 𝑒 ∗ 𝑉𝑚𝑤 + − max wind
𝑅𝑖 4 2
𝐵 𝑉𝑚𝑤 = max windspeed
𝐴 = 𝑅𝑚𝑤
2
𝑉𝑚𝑤 𝑓= Coriolis parameter
𝐵 =𝜌∗𝑒 1 < B < 2.5
𝑃𝑛 − 𝑃𝑐
the parameter B defines the shape of the profile and A
determines its location relative to the origin.
10
Numerical Models
ADvanced CIRCulation (ADCIRC) Model
The governing equations in spherical coordinates are as follows:
12
Model Domain and Mesh
~200 m along the coasts
~1000 m in the ocean boundary
~22,895 nodes; 44,142 elements
13
Model Parameters
• ADCIRC
• Manning’s roughness – 0.02
• Lateral viscosity – 2.0 m2/s
• Generalized Wave Continuity Equation (GWCE) factor – 0.005
• Wave equation time weighting factors – 0.350, 0.300, 0.350
• Time step - 2s
14
Tides
• Six Tidal Constituents – K1, M2, O1, P1, Q1, and S2 San Fernando,
• Actual Data: NAMRIA San Fernando Station La Union
• RMSE: 6.8 cm
Dagupan City
Time series of actual tide data and simulated tide at San Fernando,
La Union from September 1-30, 2016 15
Historical Typhoons
• 150 km search radius centered in
Dagupan City
• Japan Meteorological Agency
(JMA)
• 97 typhoons from 1953-2019
• Typhoons were ranked according
to highest windspeed, lowest
central pressure and closest
distance to the study area
• Typhoons originate in either the
Pacific Ocean or the West
Philippine Sea http://agora.ex.nii.ac.jp/digital-typhoon/index.html.en 16
Historical Typhoons
• Track A – tracks north of the
study area
• Track B – tracks south of the
study area
• Track C – tracks directed
towards north; east of the study
area
• Track D – tracks directed
towards north; west of the
study area
17
Historical Typhoons
• Minimum recorded central pressure – 940 hPa
• Highest recorded 10-min maximum windspeed – 45 m/s
• Average recorded 10-min maximum windspeed – 30 m/s
18
Historical Typhoons
Selected historical typhoons based on the
track, distance, windspeed, and central
pressure
Year Name Central Max 10-min
Pressure near sustained
Study Area windspeed near
(hPa) study area (mps)
2016 SARIKA 965 40
2003 LINFA 985 25 TY Vicki 1998
1998 VICKI 980 30 Dagupan City
2008 HALONG 975 30
2011 NALGAE 965 40
20
Results Typhoon Linfa 2003 surface plot for simulated maximum
water surface elevation (WSE)
• Typhoon Linfa (Tropical Storm Chedeng)
• Formed in West Philippine Sea
• Crossed Lingayen Gulf on May 27, 2003
• 25 m/s max 10-min sustained windspeed; 985
hPa central pressure
• 0.4 m storm tide
21
Results Typhoon Halong 2008 surface plot for simulated maximum
water surface elevation (WSE)
22
Results Typhoon Nalgae 2011 surface plot for simulated maximum
water surface elevation (WSE)
• Typhoon Nalgae (Typhoon Quiel)
• Formed in Pacific Ocean
• Crossed Lingayen Gulf on October 1, 2011
• 40 m/s max 10-min sustained windspeed; 965
hPa
• 0.8 m storm tide
23
Results Typhoon Sarika 2016 surface plot for simulated maximum
water surface elevation (WSE)
24
Results
25
Conclusions
• To investigate the storm tide brought by historical typhoons along Dagupan
Coast, the ADCIRC mode is used in simulating the storm tides of the selected
historical typhoons
• Typhoons that traversed the study area either originated in the Pacific Ocean of
the West Philippine Sea. Relatively, typhoons from the West Philippine Sea are
weaker than those coming from the Pacific Ocean.
26
Conclusions
• From the ranking of typhoons based on the distance, track, maximum 10-min
sustained windspeed, and central pressure, five (5) typhoons were selected
and simulated in this study.
• From the simulation of the five (5) selected typhoons, the simulated
maximum storm tide reached a storm tide of 1.1 meter produced by Typhoon
Vicki 1998
• The output of this study will be helpful for storm surge awareness and
preliminary planning of coastal disaster mitigation strategies.
27
Recommendations
• Currently, there are no water level gaging stations in Lingayen Gulf. Due to the lack
of available water level data, validation of the simulated storm tide is not
performed in this study. It is recommended that to improve future coastal hazard
studies, a water level monitoring station should be considered for installation in
Lingayen Gulf.
• This study only considered storm tide, and as such it is also recommended that the
effects of river discharges and waves be considered in future studies.
28
Acknowledgement
• The author would like to acknowledge the National Mapping and Resource
Information Authority (NAMRIA) for providing the bathymetric data and tide data
of this study.
• The author would also wish to thank the Institute of Civil Engineering, University
of the Philippines Diliman for the support in this research study.
29
References
• Holland, G. J. (1980). An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes. Monthly Weather Review, vol.
108, pp. 1212-1218.
• Hardy, T.A., McConchie J.D., Mason, L.B. (2004). Modelling tropical cyclone over-water wind and pressure fields. Ocea
n Engineering, vol. 31, pp 1757-82
• Japan Meteorological Agency, Regional Specialized Meteorological Center Tokyo – Typhoon Center, Best Track Data, htt
p://www.jma.go.jp/jma/jma-eng/jma-center/rsmc-hp-pub-eg/besttrack.html.
• Joint Typhoon Warning Center Tropical Cyclone Best Track Data, http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc- ph/RSS/jtwc/
best_tracks
• Leuttich, R.A., and Westerink, J.J., (2004) .Formulation and numerical implementation of the 2D/3D ADCIRC finite ele
ment model version 44.XX,
• Leuttich R.S., Westerink, JJ. (2015). Advanced Circulation Model for Oceanic, Coastal, and Estuarine Waters, User’s Ma
nual-v51. University of North Carolina
• Philippine Statistics Authority, https://psa.gov.ph/
• National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council (2015). Y It Happened – Learning from Typhoon Yolanda, ht
tp://www.ndrrmc.gov.ph/12-others/2926-y-it-happened-learning-from-typhoon-yolanda.
• National Mapping and Resource Information Authority, Hydrographic and Geodetic Surveys Department, Bathymetric
Chart 4209.
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/surge/
• Villalba, I.B.O.V and Cruz, E.C., (2017). A study on the effects of historical typhoon parameters on storm surge generati
on in San Pedro Bay using ADCIRC Model. Asian and Pacific Coasts 2017: Proceedings of the 9th International Conferen
ce on APAC 2017, pp 247-258. 30
Thank you for listening!
31