The Case For Monarchy In The Age Of Trump: A Beginner’s Guide To The Far-Right

Steven Addison

If you enjoy the book and would like to provide a tip towards publishing, PayPal link below:

https://paypal.me/stevenaddison1488

PUNCHLINE

The point of this book is to convey exactly why I believe communism is tolerated by capitalism
but not vice versa - capitalism is indeed not tolerated by communism. Where there is an area of
capitalism, there may be communes. But within a commune there is no capitalism proper - there is
typically an explicit or implicit enforcement against the right to own currency of any form.

But the situation is more complex than that. If capitalist surroundings are allowed to trade with
communes, especially allowed to trade citizens, i.e. immigration - then chaos will ensue, particularly the
chaos of slavery. If capitalist internationalist trade is allowed between capitalist country and communist
country or commune, there may well be a chance that the commune will enslave its citizens to enable
trade with the capitalist nation.

Ludwig von Mises didn’t know how astute his observations were when he said communism
always depends on capitalist price-setting. If there were no capitalism, there would be no guard against
enslavement. Communes present a clear and present danger to the institution of human rights,
particularly guards against enslavement - rights to not be enslaved.

A communist country could easily remove human rights to the extent that torture is allowed to
continue until negotiations have been established for free stuff in exchange for the victims. The torture
would continue until the capitalist nation is forced by its own proposal to maintain human rights
traditions globally - to work for the commune. In this way, a single commune could theoretically enslave
the entire world by manufacturing new victims.

These victims could even pose as victims falsely, by communist foreplanning of a hoax, without
the capitalist nation’s knowledge!

SELFISH GENES AND CAPITALISM

In contemplating the enhancement of epigenetic expression and integrity of neuron insulation

and branching under auspices of sacred mushroom consumption, I would like to be able to relate the
psychedelic experience and its aftermath in terms of personality alteration, to relate with the very
common idea by Richard Dawkins of the “selfish gene”. To do this in a constructive way, I find it highly
appropriate to relate the genetic selfishness and psychedelic experience to the phenomenon of
capitalist resource allocation philosophy which depends for its success on the selfishness of consenting
interacting individuals in the division of labor. The Dawkins approach at implicitly or explicitly extolling
the virtues of selfish behavior in the creation of the miracle of human biology I argue must be translated
to the miracle of capitalist exchange through the medium of “money”. Without state intervention, the
alleged predatory nature inherent to what people commonly refer to as “modern capitalism” would be
quite unlike the usual pejorative conceptions. There would not be game antagonism in terms of
opponents, but merely a healthy competitive cooperation. What would be good for you would be good
for me in terms of continued exchange.

There seems to be a contentious debate concerning social Darwinism in the market which is
used as a criticism of “Business Democracy” in the spirit of Donald Trump in an argument of some better
“socialist” manner of allocating the scarce resources in earthly conditions.

As a psychedelic expounding: the ideological social market is an outgrowth of satisfactory

conditions most easily established with the theory of true capitalism. Advertising in the social market of
psychedelic-induced novel ideations is infinitely aided by the practice of “speaking in I-statements” as a
method of inviting one to establish on their own an identity with the experience of the one offering the
idea which is focused on their own personal experience. I go a step further in this line of logic by
imagining that others may agree when I conclude that one is more trustworthy when they freely admit
to being narcissistic and proceed in a narcissistic attitude with regard to speech. I decide that the
speaker is more honest when they own up to a behavior which is wrongly criticized by societal
consensus.

The psychedelic experience lends itself toward a personal understanding of the nature of God in
such a way that it may well be interpreted bluntly as stating “you are God” when perhaps you may not
have been prior to the experience. I go a step further in this analysis to suggest that if this applies to
everyone, then “we are all one in God” because what applies to you potentially may apply to anyone
else. This matters little, however, when it comes upon one that death is imminent, because in my
estimation one’s lifetime social circle will matter naught in the face of ancestral introduction rituals into
the afterlife, so the overwhelming importance lies in one’s conception of the meaning “I am God”
because this is the question requiring telepathic essay response at the time for assignment to afterlife
social quarters by ancestors. Indeed I go as far as to say it is most conducive to the individual’s welfare
that one begin to adopt an interpretation of God as a dimension in which shared “God” status among
transcended spirits establishes the reality that the dimension of the afterlife housing itself is the true
God. This is starkly opposed to the concept of “God” as a monarchic ruler of the terms of energy-
allocation in the afterlife realm.

Addressing concerns of implications toward common church experience I invoke Terence

McKenna’s idea that “the only understanding of the universe which will be useful to you is your own
understanding”. With this I suggest the utility of a common concept that reading the Bible is potentially
more advantageous to the individual than listening to a “trusted” pastor interpret it for you. This is
complicated by the argument that the masses are not smart enough to get much from reading, of
course. But I will advocate that society teaches the common lesson regarding independence in the logic
of teaching one to fish as opposed to giving someone fish repeatedly.

RUMINATIONS ON THE ORIGIN OF HORROR, DREAD, AND FEAR

I postulate that systemic or institutional “aggression” leads to or has in the past initiated the
development of “violence” and from “violence” comes “fear”. Here I imagine ancient ancestors
witnessing death of those to whom they were socially bonded, and this generates anxiety about the
afterlife by wondering where they went. Terence McKenna said “the purpose of life is to familiarize the
self with the after-death body so the act of dying doesn’t create confusion in the psyche”.

In capitalist terms I would like to render the common notion that “the purpose of religion is to
prepare for death”. The previous ideas suggest that perhaps a bad eternity comes from a bad death, and
a death may be bad for psychological reasons as opposed to physical reasons, or the psychological
reasons could be tied into these physical reasons. In meditation on gassed Jews vs starved Christians in
the respective Holocaust and Holodomor of the respective Nazi’s and Communists, I submit that
starvation is a more agonizing way to die than being gassed.

In this thinking, we may arrive at the conclusion that procurement of food by loving kids was a
priority for older humans as compared to their younger counterparts. Unfortunately for evolution it may
not have been the case except among only the most “loving” of large families that these considerations
were held to the standards used in young mating choice selection and social Darwinism. Therefore I
believe the vast majority of our ancestors are righteously angry, like the wrathful Old Testament God,
and will spite us in the afterlife if we choose to allow ourselves to feel victimized in the perspective of
their vast starvation. My apologetics for religion derives from instillation of the value of “indoctrination
about the indoctrination for selfish fear of death”. Thus, even if the afterlife were not real, it would
behoove prior generations to instruct children about reverence for the process of death to ease old-age
food reception. Retirement in this view should righteously be superficial in the sense of enforcing a
“fake” social contract to allow a “return of favor” in a true-communist sense of the reality of life in
which as time progresses age increases and age increase brings death closer.

FASCIST RELIGION AND CULTURE AND LANGUAGE

Evolutionary social Darwinism comes into religion here in the instruction of morality norms
regarding “love vs hate” in order to adhere to a culturally-chosen style of indoctrination systems or
“religion”. This should entail a capitalist competition in the ideological marketplace which entheogenic
peoples assert is enhanced and aided by ingestion of sacred mushrooms in cultural rituals as shamanic
origins of religion espoused. These shamans promote selfish performance displays of mythology in
particular languages for greater receptivity in those learning the mythology/ritual. Perhaps the lyric
“Papa don’t preach, wife in trouble” pertains to the raising of offspring into cultural mythology norms of
“love vs hate” standards and principles. In the market of ideas, the phenomenon of the “internet
meme” has a meaningful connection to Terence McKenna’s idea of the “meme” as the smallest unit of
ideology delivered in a communicable form. The “meme market” is a miracle of capitalist effort as an
economic good in the market of ideas and ideologies, subject to supply and demand according to
intelligence-related services rendered by “memes”.

The service provided by “linguism” or language-based fascism, is toward a social Darwinism

which facilitates speedier transfer and communication of “valued mythologies” and religions via familial
conversation based customized commentary on the universal themes together with contextual delivery
of the subject and interpretations and applications into daily life and conduct and manners.

Taking biology together with DNA “reading” processing and its antithesis of cancer and
assuaging by apoptosis, I go a step further in the social Darwinist form of DNA selection over generations
and the problem of cancer as taken together they may be useful for understanding the social Darwinist
utility of “language”. To aid understanding in the biology-inclined reader I suggest we see human
reproduction and population increase by birth as a program inherently stemming from the reading of
DNA strands as proteins coded for by it. This is to say culture, language, religion, state, cult, etc. are DNA
strands and they are read to instigate the production of proteins aka reproduction of human bodies with
substantial physical mass. I see language as a form of apoptosis used to correct cancerous growths of
social action. Language has a correcting effect on errant or nonsensical behaviors in groups of people
coordinating their efforts to be constructive in all kinds of ways. Language may be seen as the apoptosis
in aborting cancerous programs of family-generating cultures. This can be as simple as ridiculing another
culture for having too many babies without being able to support them, and this is done with words and
understanding by linguist social Darwinism, interpreted here as apoptosis reaction to cancerous socio-
economic growths of culture. A more advanced example then would be the contentious culture of
“questioning authority and structures of justice production”. The aim of language and linguistic fascism
in anti-cancer apoptosis in this counter-culture is to properly interpret things like Jesus and his heroic
story in the bible as it applies to the virtues and sacrifices of dedication to inquiring about systemic
tyranny.

CULTURE AND SOCIAL CONTRACT

The facets of a culture should ensure a geographical spatial monopoly on the editing process of
the social contract. This entails justice security production markets which in a generalized sense allow
for free speech mechanisms which correct the parameters of this social contract. As I suggest this social
contract is evolved in social Darwinist manner by ideological capitalist competition in written language
and conversationally spoken religious interpretation on moral guidance of life choices. I also suggest
fascism is a cancer-curing mechanism allowing apoptosis to begin cleansing of nonsensical DNA
programs of erroneous culture formation. If fascism is suppressed, global cancer becomes diagnosable
and apparent.

In analyzing the relation between church and state, it is helpful to remind oneself that
“democracy” itself has been held to the status of secular God for over a century. Church is inherently
similar if not identical to a state when church is seen in its proper hypothetical geographical monopolist
on cultural inclusion systems context. Church and state are methods of ensuring and enforcing a
widespread willing participation in the process of willfully indoctrinating self and others into the social
contract for reasons of easing retirement by food-procurement from family and community at old age.

“Cults” may be more palatable options for those who disagree with states and theocracies. But
essentially states and churches should be considered cults – not in a pejorative sense. All states,
churches, and cults can in the future and have been since archaic times used as opportunities to
elaborate on, negate, or mutate/evolve mythological structures which are or have been observed by
some portion of various populations recognizing these mythologies. Portions of code in the
metaphorical DNA sense may be resurrected from the past and inserted into the modern DNA strands of
culture to bolster immune protection from nonsense. This is traditionalism in essence. Cults may be
more spatially adaptive than religions for some people, but others may appreciate the longevity of
religion as a legitimizing factor. States should be made more adaptive like these, which is why I believe
in theocratic monarchies as being theoretically adaptive much more so than the sluggish motion of mob
rule in democracies. In the modern day, ill-gotten finances may suddenly be dispersed in foreign regions
to erupt in vast rapid culture changes that threaten such a sluggish state. Think about ostensible
globalists stimulating ISIS terrorism and refugee importation!

In brief, I suggest an archetypal analogy equating “gene” and “meme” with respect to concepts
of cultural creation. Religion is an ostensibly or supposedly outdated apoptosis mechanism for
diagnosable cancer related to suppressed fascism a la antifa. Bluntly, antifa IS CANCER.
 I also suggest that the political party complex of the modern state is analogically a vector for a
transbacterial virus which under primordial or primitive conditions aka “logically superficial or naïve
assumption of cultural parameters” serves a novelty-promoting function in “social Darwinist evolution of
meme by free market capitalist ideological competition”. I see antifa as a pejoratively savvy or ulterior or
facetious or wiley collective aggression movement in the manner of an ongoing culture war.

It might be helpful to the reader to imagine that my culture cancer concept is opposed to
culture evolution in the vein of evil twin vs good twin or different sides of the same coin with respect to
plausibility of human reading of cultural genetic codes.

A Leprosy analogue in this thinking could transform sentimental solidarity under auspices of
miscegenation, especially “forced” miscegenation in ostensibly-Zionist manner. This would be a
collectivist agenda which is focused on degenerative egalitarian and secular evangelist notions to be
promoted among a target population. Potentially there are witting accomplices to this “master plan of
cultural genocide leading to gradual and/or rapid physical genocide”. This would be introduced to a
geographic culture in the analogy of a “viral contraction” to sponsor a reversal of state evolution aka
“state cancer”. Imagine a bio-ideological-warfare WMD multicultural-Trojan-horse delivering
metaphorically an HIV to AIDS esque condition of susceptibility to vulnerability towards hijacking of the
monoculture-nation body/corpus of “the system of scarce-resource-allocation”. This uses arbitrarily
individualist and expressionist and humanist “genetic-noise-DNA-code-glitches” to deliver algorithms of
“social justice agendas” as missense-DNA to initiate an auto-immune-complication scheme in which
Hegelian dialectic “manufactured ecological and economic crises” serve as justification for a
“predetermined and elite-engineered solution” to smuggle artificiality in inevitably-idolized “party
activists” to be seen as “crusaders of atheism or the path of history”. Simultaneously whistleblowers
against mandatory vaccination lobbied by vaccine manufacturers shall be demonized by instilling a view
of these “anti-vaxx whistleblowers” as “paranoid-panic-armageddon” enthusiasts or religious fanatics.
Even their sympathizers will be ridiculed as “anti-science freaks or new-age weirdo’s”. The primary
cultural target to be eliminated in this “master plan” is the very understanding of the monoculture-
body-corpus values of individualist to universalist policy translations which are properly conducive to
preservation of constitutional values, and insulation from domestic pejorative subversion. The social
engineers seem aimed at deploying a condition of emotionally-motivated suspense of adherence to logic
in favor of adopting the virtue of the aesthetics of superficial-Trojan-horse-decorations. These
decorations encourage enthusiastic “trust of strangers via radical inclusion” to perverse otherwise-
benevolent notions of universalized-individualism which would properly provide a statist-shortcut to
proverb-based policy mandating and replace this with mass-value-adoption to appeal to common
colloquial awareness of superficial gratification using popular slogans like “innocent until proven guilty”
and the statue of liberty’s “give us your poor” sentiment as an artistic design of the “outer viral
envelope” or optics of the Trojan horse institutionalizing streamlined presentation of superficially-
virtuous puppet-actor demagogic “moral-principled” boyscout tools to assemble an impenetrable
cultural virus veil of formal symbolism.

Culture wars have been rightfully sensationalized in stories or renditions of relevant and
prevalent cultural mythologies using religious gospels, written and audial and visual media, and history
itself with themes of collective guilt vs pride of ancestor inheritance, most importantly.

However, this stimulation of the culture war using sensationalized myths and interpretations
thereof in gospels, media, and history may trigger an urge toward pejorative expressionist individualism
in many males. Only few males may instead have a theoretically more benevolent, intellectual urge to
contemplate collectivist philosophy. In these two paths there is an inflated ego response where
alignment with narratives regarding moral values is coopted from parroting champions of mythological
interpretations and their spread among other people. Embedded in this degenerative impulse is a desire
to mind-control in a bullying manner essentially, perhaps in the attempt to establish beta vs alpha roles
in males. These may have in mind a pecking order ideal of some sort. Obviously the abstract, long-term
goal would be here to influence distribution strategies of materially scarce resource allocation. At worst
this may entail an expectation of “loyal offspring from harems”, the more numerous to gain extra social
authority to manipulate, connotate, and adopt and adapt or even commandeer the social Darwinist
evolution of the generalized meme market.

INTRODUCTION PROPER

Through the history of economics and technology in the perspective of transitioning forms of
“The State” (possibly referred to as “The Government”) we have witnessed an increase in wealth IN
SPITE OF transition to democracy, not BECAUSE OF transition to democracy, in the evolution of the
historical forms of “The State”.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe makes it clear that monarchy, while not historically perfect, was
absolutely preferable especially in terms of conduct of warfare. Under the auspices of monarchy, we
saw simply territorial wars of kings. The total ideological wars waged in the name of encroaching
“Democracy” seem deliberately conducted by the ostensibly Zionist ultra elite in order to systematically
weaken male courage by killing off the heroes. Indeed world war 1 could have likely never occurred if
there had not been conflicting dynamics between: newspaper printing press technology engendering
democratic appeals to mass opinion, and frustrations complicated by the dwindling integrity of
monarchical institutions.

Undesirable traits have been bred into humans, such as being deceptive and “mind-controlling”
in pursuit of popularity and cultural inclusion, becoming dependent on extant forms of government
institutions especially in welfare programs, not arranging for jobs for offspring, being arbitrarily obedient
to extant forms of authority, and “doing what you’re supposed to do” to gain social status and
streamline ease of obtaining perceived quality of life.

Being genuinely productive has been bred out of humans because of added stresses associated
with systematic Federal Reserve theft, and in the past few generations we have witnessed a precipitous
decline in amount of children born to the majority of “capitalism-loyal couples” perhaps as a result of
financial implications of “economic feminism”, and as a result of being forced to work for “leeches on
the welfare system” in such a way that no “mutual benefits” between donor and recipient, involving
“appreciation” or return of stipulated, contractual advertising services for charity, are being encouraged
or reinforced. The motto-rule is “let government play Robin Hood for you.”

Benjamin Netanyahu made an astute observation that “Jewish Identity”, meaning social order
and culture, will be hindered by progressive liberal leftism while the rise of Christian Nationalists will not
only be harmless toward but actively promote the cultural and economic integrity of “jewish Identity”.
This is because the much-maligned “separation or segregation” between disparate cultures actually
allows “us” to build “ourselves” up through the socially-stimulating nature of capitalist exchange with
“our people”. The much-promoted “miscegenation” of disparate cultures burdens “us” with the
requirement that “we” dilute the return-on-investment of “our” efforts by helping people who by
cultural obstacles naturally cannot or will not return the favor to the same extent which “our people”
could and would.

Jeff Sessions is an example of someone who is successful “because of” the system and
adherence to it. Trump is an example of someone successful “in spite of” the system and shirks
commonly perceived responsibilities others deem necessary to remain loyal to extant hierarchies of
arbitrary authority. In deeper analysis, we may arrive at the idea that Jeff Sessions has a mode of being
in which submission to “objective” definitions is the rule. Trump makes his own “subjective” definitions.
These definitions are particularly of what is considered by “society” as “right” and “wrong”. Pertaining to
this, namely there is much depth in the logic that “anti-politics” should not be classified as simply “part
of politics” as is the stereotypical modern norm of conception and definition.

The extolling of “democracy” has led to a transformation of the “entry into power” mechanics
into a phenomenon of “club access” which, in the sense of social Darwinism, selects for negative,
obsequious traits inherent to the search for “social inclusion” with respect to superficial titles, in a much
more pronounced and intense way than would be the case in the historical monarchist alternative of
mere familial and genetic “inheritance” of economically relevant social titles.

The nuanced and sophisticated understanding of the relative superiority of monarchism

suggests to the thoughtful that the heavenly Angels’ opinions of Napoleon should most probably be
even worse than the common earthly opinions of Hitler. The common perception of the French
Revolution is in my conspiratorially inclined opinion, ultimately the result of an “intellectual hoax”
perpetrated by otherwise irrelevant figures in historical academia, sponsored by the future-oriented
elite members. These types have a vested interest in the transfiguration of monarchy and theocracy into
democratic institutionalism. It seems a healthy exercise to imagine the French Revolution as having
ultimately fake motivations at its inception, because it seems apparent that things must not be nearly as
bad as they have been widely purported to have been by centuries of propaganda, if you have the
energy to follow through with something of that magnitude and brutality. Along this line of thinking,
matters relating to organization and hunger seem to suggest that the French Revolution was an early
“psy-op” (psychological operation) and/or a proverbial “conspiracy” and/or a “false flag operation”.

THE WALL

Our Republic is supposed to be “democratic” in a positive sense, but the controversy

surrounding the funding of the border wall proves that it is only “democratic” in a negative sense.
“Positive democracy” would be portrayed in situations where allocation of tax funds reflects the desires
of accurate proportions of the population, and “negative democracy” is the degeneracy of “mob rule”,
or dictatorship of the 51% over the 49%. Even the most liberal polls will show that at least 1/3 of the
population wants a border wall, so even if it costs 30% of the budget, if we had “positive democracy”,
there would be no argument about building it. The sense of dire national emergency derives from the
obstinacy with which supposed “Democrats” are blocking the democratic process of fulfilling the wishes
of a large fraction of the population by absurd nitpicking over less than one percent of the budget.
They’re calling themselves “democrats” while blocking the democratic use of less than one percent of
taxes to fulfill the desires of over 30% of the population! This is like being stuck with roommates who
refuse to allow you to install a lock on the front door! The only sensible response is to panic and
“declare an emergency”.

Most media and the masses are eager to frame the left-right situation as though leftism and
rightism are roughly equal, albeit opposite, modes of desire and motivation. This is not so! The leftists
are the sole aggressors, and rightists are almost exclusively preoccupied in a reactionary effort to
tediously dismantle all the chaotic knots messily generated by the villainous left. The overtelevized issue
on the right is the wall, and that of the left is the Green New Deal. The newspaper frames both issues as
roughly equal, albeit opposites. It is no consolation that both are considered ridiculous, even if the wall
weren’t a legitimate reaction to globalism and Mexican leftism. The infuriating fact is that the wall calls
for less than one percent of stolen funds, while the Green New Deal calls for vastly more funds to be
stolen to cover its costs! The masses have been trained to laugh at the suggestion of a wall, while the
Green New Deal elicits dead silence! Financially speaking, the far-left calls for over a hundred-fold more
ridiculous theft than anything the far-right wants. The right wants a pink toolshed, and the left wants a
pink mall, and we’re being trained to consider both “equally absurd”!

THE WALL VS DRUG PROFITEERING

The importance of the delicate treatment of the “black market drugs” issue comes from
considerations of both: the sober individual’s “right to live in an area with legal deterrents to rampant
drug use”, and everyone’s “right to minimize the motivations toward drug-profit-driven murders and
gang violence”. The first consideration for generally sober conditions, in which drug users have a
compelling reason to at least try not to “act high” in public, is a hard-to-touch basis for the argument in
favor of keeping drugs on a “black market status”, i.e., generally “illegal for recreational purposes”. In
short, people have a right to empower and legitimize their phobia of coming into public contact with
potentially wild or “bad karma” active drug users! So the typical libertarian, “anarchist” position, of
immediately decriminalizing or legalizing all drugs, is lacking when we consider “social rights” of sober
people. The technically victimless nature of a “malum prohibitum” such as personal drug use is
insufficient to override important rights to “fascist treatment” of parameters of public/social
interactions. Very importantly, pause to consider that this last argument only applies to “publicly
owned” areas, and under “full private property” conditions of real libertarian anarchist societies, “the
rules” would be freely, and more spontaneously, decided by the owners/managers of each particular,
geographically determined, property area. As a side note, to communism, realize now, that one-size-fits-
all rules would necessarily be forced on the 49% minority by the 51% majority under a “democratic”
regime – and, of course, “democracy will be used as an ideological tool to smuggle communist values!
My second major consideration, about the astronomical profits of drug distribution, “raising stakes” to
escalate gang-business to murder, invites the reader to prioritize any measure that reduces profits of
drug distribution. My arguments in this regard involve: the assertion that current drug prices are already
“maxed out”, and that a form of “globalism” is at work, whereby black-market-costs of drug production
are artificially lowered by governmental difference sin law enforcement between the USA and Latin
American countries. President Trump’s efforts to reduce the black-market imports of drugs can only
alleviate drug-related gang activity while protecting “sober rights”. Trump will hereby reduce the
“artificial competitive advantage” of separation between production/distribution risks and costs of doing
business generated by differential law-enforcement-application between two different “states”. Border
enforcement of drug laws will have the effect of a tariff, and the black-market jobs of drug synthesis or
“production will shift to domestic areas. “Domestic” production of drugs is subject to the same law
enforcement risk of doing business as the domestic “distribution” of those said drugs. Because I believe
my assertion, that no drug users will ever pay more for drugs than they currently pay, is indeed factual,
this means that profits of dealing drugs are somewhat doomed. This means limitation to the currently
astronomical profits of drug marketing by gangs. This, therefore, means reduction of the “high stakes”
currently encouraging young gang members to resort to murder to protect profits. For why would one
risk life in jail or the death penalty just to keep a job that doesn’t pay much, if any, more than a job at
McDonald’s, for instance? Also consider that said “domestic shift of production jobs” will keep more
money “domestic” to stimulate “domestic” consumer industries in our own, “domestic” markets!
Economic stimulation by “domesticized” drugs!

MONARCHISM AS ESSENTIAL FOR SUCCESSFUL ANARCHY

The real libertarian conception of anarchy is an ideal that comprises the antithesis of
authoritarianism. The ideal of anarchy is experienced in the absence of the effects of authoritarianism.
There may be instances of temporary and local anarchy which spontaneously become, isolated from
external disturbances of authoritarian effects. Anarchy is relative and personally conditioned, and may
be experienced by some privileged people, and not experienced by some unfortunate people
simultaneously in each geographical area. Anarchy may be a general trend towards which events
gravitate, and anarchy may be said to reign supreme over temporary and localized instances of
authoritarianism. Anarchy may be the successful mitigation of and negotiation with manifestations of
authoritarianism which works towards the minimization and disappearance of the effects of
authoritarianism. In a sense, authoritarianism is a fact of human nature, and may technically never
absolutely disappear, but the point of anarchy is to reduce awareness of authoritarianism in as many
senses as possible. Authoritarian methods may also be utilized in a skillful manner to arrange barriers
which isolate desired forms of authoritarianism from undesired forms of authoritarianism
geographically. The critical point to make is to assert that what is most essential for “successful anarchy”
is an overall accurate evaluation of the extant forms of authoritarianism – namely a general awareness
of who wields power and why. This is because it’s necessary to identify the true structures of
authoritarianism in order to rearrange them in a way which is advantageous to the skillful flourishing of
various localized manifestations of anarchistic lifestyles. In this sense, it is highly advantageous to
increase private ownership of capital. Public ownership, especially under “democracy”, obscures the
identification of those who truly wield power. The only way to hold tyrants accountable for their abuse
of resource management is to recognize who they are and how they exercise their power, and this idea
holds the promise for the triumph of anarchy in a revolutionary spirit. Therefore, the most conducive
political structure for the success of anarchy is monarchy, because a king legitimately controls and owns
the capital stock of a geographic area. Knowing the true source of authoritarian institutions is the first
crucial step towards rearranging them in a way which stimulates the experience of anarchy for as many
people as possible. If the king doesn’t stimulate the experience of anarchy enough, simply replace him
with a better king! Anarchy is the ease with which a revolution may successfully occur.

CURSORY ANALYSIS OF MOTIVATION TOWARD SOCIALISM

There are only unnatural reasons such as bragging and jealousy to display disclosure of bank
possessions because only really-established contracts between consenting individuals are valid, and
superficial opinions are not truly substantial. The “social contract” is a potentially useful myth given its
proper interpretation(s), and so is religion, and it is perhaps obscene to believe that concrete
conclusions should necessarily be drawn from these “useful myths”. Indeed the hypothetical “social
contract” is certainly much less sacrosanct for cultural and economic cohesion than “rights to privacy”.
Mere membership in the biological class of “human” and “being a fellow individual inhabiting nearby
geographical locale” should never directly grant neighbors any “rights” to surveil your business
transactions or lack thereof (savings).

Bernie’s claim of manifest wrongness with respect to “the top 0.01% owning 50% of the GDP” or
whatever it may exactly be, is to the thoughtful nothing but sheer fuel for communist revolution. Indeed
it looks to the trained eye like a useful strategic move towards luring the nation and world into the trap
of convincing the proletariat that “the very idea of money is wrong”. Any tracking of this statistical
information should be skeptically criticized for its reckless potential to be “computationally hacked” in a
methodical departure away from, and out of, a protective intended veil of anonymity ostensibly granted
by the “computational mechanism” espoused initially for promoting “privacy rights”, but ultimately to
be abused, revealing imminent jeopardy of “privacy rights” for everyone involved.

If you can’t convince your neighbor to invest in “your idea” (market-oriented as opposed to
politically-motivated) in order to “share wealth and be mutually beneficial” then you aren’t good
enough at socialistically “being a community member” to deserve that money and laborious energy
expenditure from your “neighbor” more than him. You obviously should not be able to “be fascist” by
saying that your “behavior similarities as a fellow human” certifiably eclipse and trump all theoretical
potential virtues of familial cultural or genetic inheritances. To be such a “fascist” would truly be
interpreted as being “intolerant” of others’ hypothetical potential “intra-familial cultural values” and
you have no rights to “force others into divulging family secrets”. Indeed most families probably could
not account for all the “family secrets” they hold dear as they are subconscious or automatically
inherited and passed down through generations, or certainly could be.

If anarcho-capitalist “abuse of money” is proven by voluntarily associating individuals and their

respective collectives, then it should be a virtue of “ostracism aka fascism” that people are capable of
territorial and financial banning or boycott of people like George Soros, the Rothschilds, and the
Rockefellers. Sebastian Kurz of Austria achieved this with respect to George Soros.

CONSIDERATIONS CAPITALIST AND COMMUNIST

Capitalism is focused on helping the “poor” gain access to resources otherwise only accessible to
the “rich”. Communism is only focused on hurting the “rich” immensely by wholly stealing from or
enslaving them. The former aims to protect, while the latter aims to abolish, the institution of “money”.
“Money” is not actually a “tool to increase power for the rich” but is truly a clever way to increase
access to scarce resources on behalf of the “poor” through mutually beneficial contractual
arrangements with those “rich” people who may “have” said resources.

Communist philosophy demands that “equality or egalitarianism” be instituted or established or

created NOW by “abolishing money” to force the “rich” into likely unwanted interactions with the
“poor” by statist designs in authoritarian manner. This is to be done with the only alternative of literally
cannibalizing said “rich”.

Anarcho-communist philosophy demands that money be the first thing to ban in order to
achieve its strategy pursuant to the establishment of an anarchist utopia. Anarcho-capitalist philosophy
on the other hand recognizes that money should be among the very last of things to disappear in an
anarchist utopia. Anarcho-communists will declare that money is a method enabling the “rich” to “be
lazy” at the expense of the “poor”. Anarcho-capitalists on the other hand declare that money is a
method of ensuring the ease with which bartering between consenting individuals may be secured.
Anarcho-communism aims to pull the crutches out from under imperfect societies and forcefully impose
“their collective” ideas of “utopia” upon geographically proximal victims aka “community members”.
Anarcho-capitalism aims to leave said money-crutch in place in order to allow a natural utopia to unfold
as slowly as collectively willed upon destruction of the state in order to better allow individuals to
geographically and spatially disperse via ostracism and cultural inclusion to end up in their own desired
and preferred locations and titular positions until voluntary “self-money-crutch-removal” or
alternatively until money becomes a quaint artifact to remind posterity of a “less perfect time in history”
as a monument to historical human achievements.

HEALTHY SYMPATHY FOR IDEOLOGIES

It’s perfectly healthy and permissible to sympathize, at least partially, with virtually every
perspective, ideology, religion, or political persuasion, with the obvious exception of things like
pedophilia and torture. The power to manipulate and redefine words and emphasize virtues of
conceptual labels is such that I can get creative enough to find a technical way to use the word
“communist” to describe my far-right belief system. I simply apply an abstract logic to generate a
connection between my beliefs and a popular label like “liberal”. This has already happened famously
with the “classical liberals” who are the opposite of modern liberals. Sympathizing with ideals behind
various beliefs is seldom problematic, but what really counts toward physical and ideological
segregation is an individual’s choice to “forbid” the acceptance of a particular label. What truly renders
one unable to be tolerated is an undue zeal in their disdain for and aversion to the labels “National
Socialist”, “Far-Right”, and “fascist”. Inability to sympathize with these labels is a mental disorder!

PECULIAR WORRISOME CONNECTIONS IN POPULAR MODERN CULTURAL IDEOLOGIES

Hypothesis outlined hereon is to establish a series of connections, one flowing into the next
thusly: RELIGION -> DEMOCRACY -> MULTICULTURALISM -> LIBERALISM -> GLOBALISM -> COMMUNISM
-> WHITE GENOCIDE -> RELIGION (circulating back to beginning). To start with “religion” to “democracy”
I note that religion encourages democracy by creating an imaginary leader that no one has ever seen,
which invites special interpreters like the Pope and Muslim Grand Mufti’s. These religious leaders
promote the interests of Zionist global elites toward their efforts to control the global masses. The
masses are brainwashed into condoning the democratic system because the illusion is made that choice
of master in political puppets gives them control, enabling docile long-term behavior. Contributing is the
idea that “democracy is a good thing” and the overall motivation of Islam seems to be to plant the “gold
standard” of democratic ideals into the global conceptions of all populations. Moving on, democracy
promotes multiculturalism in an obvious mechanism of undermining a thriving “monoculture” in a host
nation using a secret invasion by “counterculture parasites”. Multiculturalism is literally just a planned
undermining of a monoculture. Multiculturalism naturally transforms into liberalism, especially with the
help of democracy. Multiculturalism initiates and instigates “mob rule” by justifying multiple cultures
under a single government to be wrestled, for control of it, by one or more of these adversarial cultures.
The state boundary of a single government turns democracy into a “breeding game” when it is inevitably
suggested that race is inherently defined by culture and vice versa. This turns people into “sheep”
multiplying their way to power with the advantage of accepting loose sexual morals and obtaining
“voting number statistics”. Moving on, multiculturalism leads to liberalism within the framework of
democracy when a lower-achieving “culture or race” lobbies government to claim that help should be
institutionalized on their behalf at the expense of the higher-achieving “cultures or races”. These
leeches espouse “equal outcomes” instead of supporting “equal opportunity”. Liberalism in modern
times is a reference to the command that an original monoculture shall engage in “affirmative action”
for “zombies” who demand handouts by virtue of their subscription or identification to or with a
“multicultural” label. It becomes easy to gain leverage unofficially or even officially by claiming that you
are a Jew, for example, instead of just another human being. Moving on, we may be able to see that
when a democracy has fully embraced “modern liberalism” it directly supports the shift toward
“globalism” simply because the policy of sponsoring “underperformers” shifts from the scope of an
intra-national policy to an international policy. The transformation from liberalism to globalism is an
obvious matter of course, but the ways in which globalism promotes communism are not yet straight-
forward to most people. To move on, globalism initially allows each nation to take care of a portion of a
global economy, so different governments with different laws equate to an allocation therein of
different jobs within the spectrum of the full global economy. This muddies the water in observing the
reasons for different standards of living within each nation, which is manifestly an argument towards a
new world order style global government. The most important concept to understand here is that all
governments in general are to be given control of the global market, including intra-national markets
because laws in one sector of the job field will be different than another due to individual government
apparatus in each nation. By this mechanism, the free market can be fundamentally interfered with and
manhandled by ostensibly “democratic” governments. It is astute to observe that this state-meddling in
the otherwise free market is communist in nature, by virtue of budding sympathy for its conduit called
“democratic socialism”. Government becomes economically godlike in its ability to control the means of
material production and material sustenance of life and coordination of labor expenditures. The
methods of communism include a “long march through the institutions” of governments and
economies, the undermining of the concept of currency in general by eliminating competition between
forms of money and establishing a global reserve currency, and to eliminate private-property-based
“capitalism” worldwide. A popular example of globalist domination of supposedly “capitalistic”
economies is what China has done to steel markets by state sponsorship of absurdly excessive
production of steel, which compromises military and infrastructure of potential enemy nations who
initially may enter into steel-purchasing-contracts with China, and this undermines the concept of a free
market in obvious ways. The domestic steel production is targeted by the communist foreign nation to
undermine the capitalist domestic ability to build war-damaged infrastructure and tanks. This is one of
many ways communism may “use” globalism to enable “white genocide”. The potential of white
genocide is enabled through communist principles, including the blaming of the white monoculture for
imperfections in the economy and culture, the “reversal” of historical slavery moving forward into the
future, and the idea that “no utopia has yet been established, so your people are guilty, so become a
slave or else you’re racist and deserve to be a slave”. Communism appeals to popular notions, and it is
becoming increasingly unpopular to be culturally white or to produce white children. The more
generations whites exist, the more each new white child will be assumed to be predisposed to racism
unless they constantly go out of their way to prove they’re not racist by having token POC friends. This
aids the forced multiculturalism fundamentally. They are assumed to be racist beforehand by virtue of
their own parents possibly transferring racist tendencies subconsciously or explicitly. These parents are
assumed racist because they deliberately chose to mate with someone who is not a POC.
PROGRESSIVE VALUES AND ULTERIOR MOTIVES

An example of people preying on eachother by appealing to evil authoritarian nature and desire
for control is forthwith outlined. Democrat: “I’ll gain control-zombies by necromancing via POC-related
support for equal outcomes aka affirmative action. “Pro-POC zombie”: “I’ll control what Democrats do
by taking advantage of the fact that they like and support me by virtue of my simple identitarian label.”
This same dialogue-dynamic applies to “feminists” and their elitist social engineers, whose ulterior
motives together undermine the integrity of the nuclear family.

A hypothetical identity-driven interaction is forthwith outlined. Jew: “Hey fellow white, don’t
you agree this black deserves reparations because the unfair financial success of white slaveholders is
selectively beneficial to whites because institutionalized racism still exists in the workplace despite
affirmative action and the seeking of token POC friends by whites in an effort to defend against
increasingly rampant accusations of racism among whites? So because you directly benefit from the
modern institutional racism which is derived from racist history, you need to pay this black money,
political power and resources, because your skin color makes you inherently subconsciously racist, and if
you object that makes you racist for ignoring the reality of systemic racism”. White: “I must admit to
being racist because I don’t want to be racist because in the multicultural communes of the near-future
that will get me killed, so I am now paying this black reparations. Hey! Why didn’t you pay this black for
being white as well? Jew: “I am not white, I am Jewish. The holocaust was real and had momentous
implications for my cultural identity with individualist economic and social implications, and my ethnicity
collectively suffers as well. Only whites shall pay for historical oppressions!” Black: “Hey, that was a
really smart extortion scheme! Using racism to make money off racism! Genius! Here’s your cut of the
profits, Jew!”

Whites are all responsible for the actions of few whites, including crazy white “lone wolf”
shooters, and you are racist and insensitive to the dead if you question the official story pushed by the
corrupt media or try to compare statistics to black-on-black murder rates. You are racist if you argue
that slavery-related “gains” in productivity benefit (or disadvantage) everyone equally today, because if
silent racism might exist behind some closed doors, then it automatically exists everywhere due to
media amplification and sensationalization and promotion of notions of collective white guilt, and only a
full communist revolution will be sufficient to collectivize private acquisitions and ill-gotten gains. Then,
after we’re all communist, whites will be punished for being racist if they don’t admit to being racist, and
if they do admit to being racist, then obviously they will be punished for being racist. And this
punishment may be carried out by any black because that’s not racist because everyone knows reverse
racism doesn’t exist because race was conceptualized by whites for evil purposes. So even if a black
could be racist that’s not their fault because they were taught to be that way by evil whites. But purely
theoretically, if a black were ever found guilty of racism, then other blacks would not be held
responsible for that individual instance of racism the same way all whites are responsible for racist
actions of a few whites. The actions by a majority of whites to end slavery does not forgive whites in
general because black problems are naturally to be given to whites to solve, and the line between
individual vs collective responsibility is hereby intentionally blurred by communist collectivist values,
retroactively, so even though communist principles didn’t govern human behavior in the past, we will
pretend as though they did, and only whites will suffer the consequences, because we have chosen to
use whites as the punching bag because they won’t stand up against us because we have neutered them
with allegations of white guilt and they will become our slaves even though we claim to oppose slavery
because hypocrisy only applies to whites, and not us, now that we have established that they are our
official punching bag, and we assume blacks will approve of this, when they recognize this easy strategic
opportunity to enslave and genocide whites, because we psychologically project our evil and predict
that our evil nature is shared among all humans. – Sincerely, Mr. Rabbi.

CAPITALIST CHECKMATE AGAINST COMMUNISTS

The virtues of public collectivization are overshadowed by the arguably virtuous natural and
tendency to prioritize the well-being of personal offspring. The specific virtues here mentioned and
referred to regard the orientation and motivation engendered by the phenomenon of familial and truly
cultural inheritance, skill-teaching, and increased competition in business-creation and -ownership.

DEFENSE OF TRUMPISM AGAINST PEJORATIVES REGARDING MAGA

1. USA “used to be greater” than Europe and became less-great not because slavery ended or
because a “black man” became president, but because of GLOBALISM.
2. Globalism sounds good because of the idea that there are “jobs we don’t want, but this is
nonsense because economic and financial occupation should not be the goal of life and
everyone should “live for the weekend”. Love-compatibility with potential mates should not
involve careers! Nationalism is preferable to globalism in the same way that business and
employment between family is better than with strangers because for obvious reasons long
term benefits are easier to see sooner because of recycling of value into the familial system.
3. Globalism belittles the ability of and attempt by nations to experiment with institutions that
might increase the likelihood of a more perfect world via microcosms of "full” (global)
economies enabling an objective or scientific comparison of said institutions, like laws,
ethnicities, cultures, religions, and their variables vs constants.
4. “Greatness” of the experience of life in a given geography should be defined as quality of life
outside of career (during the weekend) and this can only be scientifically or objectively or
empirically studied by comparing models of law or institutions upon holding as a “constant”
the productive, economic, professional side of life using hardcore Nationalism which keeps all
jobs “domestic”. Outsourcing for foreign jobs prevents objectivity in this endeavor due to
mixture of cultural differences with economic differences, rendering the study of differences
impossible. Determining one’s favorite country would then under these circumstances be like
trying to “hold a tournament with unfair conditions in competitions”. The purpose of the
motivation to “do better” in terms of true “greatness” is under these circumstances lost and
no one can determine what “greater” means anymore. This is highly appropriate for and
conducive towards the objectives of globalism.
5. The spectrum of jobs across national, legal, and cultural boundaries should be consistent
because the “variable” in the study of the “greatness” of life should not be career-oriented, it
should be focused on cultures, ethnicities, laws, and languages within a given nation. Hence
the supremacy of “nationalism”.

DECONSTRUCTING ANARCHOCOMMUNIST CRITICISMS OF ANCARCHOCAPITALISTS

Crony capitalism and corporatocracy are not the endgame of “general capitalism”. These
phenomena are created by and are simultaneously the goal of “Big Government” aka extreme
authoritarianism and they are also obviously fundamentally antithetical to the proper “free market”.
 “Regular Capitalists” as opposed to Anarcho-Capitalists, and communists or Anarcho-
Communists, these people coexist. That is to say, Statist Capitalists and communists of all varieties
coexist. “Regular Capitalists” are not explicitly opposed to the Statist Crony Capitalist Corporatocracy for
one thing, and also serve on a globalist conspiracy level as “controlled opposition”for liberals and
communists and leftists of all varieties. Said “coexistence” can be established theoretically by virtue of
the Crony Capitalist Corporatocracy types fulfilling prophecies and thereby legitimizing communism,
while budding communist regimes like North Korea and ISIS antagonize and therefore legitimize a state-
sponsored military characteristic of corporatocracy. This creates a false dichotomy and vicious cycle
which contributes to the degeneracy supposedly or allegedly addressed through dishonest anarcho-
communist rhetoric. This is especially problematic when the corporatocracy’s intelligence agencies
secretly and/or publicly use commuinist rhetoric to seed rebellions against legitimate authoritarian
regimes by appealing to crude, low-key-authoritarian supposedly-democratic sympathies so that they
prey easily upon the emotions of unsophisticated have-nots and seed typical Hollywood mass-produced
“anti-monarchist” values of “progressive thought”. Basically “fake capitalism” that is anti-anarchist in
nature literally and ideologically funds communism. Osama bin Laden was indeed an ex-CIA agent, for
example. The FBI Russian Collusion was a clear conspiracy to enable an attempted win for Hillary Clinton
and to frame Donald Trump, for another example. I believe the Federal Reserve is a full communist
conspiracy to undermine communism’s main topic of criticism which is privately owned “money”.

Anarcho-Communists will claim that Anarcho-Capitalists are just supporting constant war like
Feudalism supposedly was. There is need to distinguish the dark age monarchist historical institutional
evidence from the modern futuristic Anarcho-Capitalist perspective, and to ensure against the
degeneration of Anarcho-Capitalism into the stereotypical Anarcho-Communist portrayal of feudalism.
In this effort I will offer the following points:

1. Future advances in technology shall broadcast public concern and hedge against unjustifiable
“spatial monopolies” of torture and atrocity, employer morality and accountability, border
enforcement policies, public awareness of laws, and surveillance of criminal elements.
2. Voluntary taxation was a widespread institution under Feudalism, and similarly anarcho-
capitalism argues against government extortion and frames this as the ultimate reason for
government’s existence. The concept of the government is to provide supposedly invaluable
services for whatever monopoly prices it wants to confiscate funding for privileged positions to
be lobbied through “the revolving door” of corporations and individuals which are incestually
capable of buying the favor of these position-holders for “kickbacks” of their own design.
3. Anarcho-communists will culminate their arguments against anarcho-capitalism by suggesting
that there will be under anarcho-capitalist conditions a “running out of landspace when all
bosses conspire to enact corrupt employer policies driving out the masses for genocidal
mechanisms”. I would respond that free market “better business bureaus” will be more
accountable than government-monopoly versions without the authoritarian bureaucracy by-
and-for “patents”. I believe that “patent creation and its requisite research funding” would not
only be stimulated without government, but that government actively undermines the potential
of scientific research by stifling it with bureaucratic gymnastics involved in grant-funding
through its suppression of unpopular opinions, for example in the industry of illegal technology
like psychedelics, hydrogen and nuclear engines, hypothetical inventions of Nikola Tesla,
 promotion and debunking-suppression of manmade vs natural hypotheses concerning global
climate change and pollution and “public systems poisoning”, etc.
4. Internet technology may be able to spread competition in a more dynamic way than under
modern statism to oust “undeserving” owners and managers without the government
sponsorship of “patent protection service monopoly”. Prevention or allowing of the liberation of
the market which liberates patents in general, using the virtue of popularization of original
researchers. Also alternative funding and investment in recording and preservation efforts by
these anarcho-capitalist “free market heroes” who design without patents may through the
advent of competing “market historians” and their archiving technologies help promote the
work of heroes in a style reminiscent of the bitcoin cryptocurrency ledger documentation.

ANCAP CLARIFICATIONS

Anarcho-Capitalism, as a phrase, implies that “true anarchy” is “true capitalism”, and vice versa.
State government imposes a huge theoretical threat to the entire ideology of functional capitalism. Even
if the state taxes at extremely low %, it has the power to monopolize and ruin entire economy segments
by first pooling vast resources by force, and then exercising the raw “buying power” of money without
producing any “real capital” in exchange. Especially if government can spontaneously create its own
money by suppressing competing currencies, all government spending can really do is distort a market
like an unhealthy stimulant-drug applied to arbitrary sectors of the economy. Indeed, if one wanted to
ruin a nation, taxing even little or printing money, coupled with actually spending such ill-gotten gains,
could be an even easier method to ruin people/economies than using armies of death. All an evil regime
would have to do is mindlessly spend money in a specific industry to ruin it by distorting prices and
allocation of real scarce capital resources (and equipment, land-rental, etc.) and thereby ruin each
industry, one by one. Typical reference to “socialism” is really partial “communism”, i.e. (partial) state
“planning” of an economy by use of ill-gotten gains. State activity is defined as a particular percentage of
communism, to my mind. Communism uses state coercion to “plan” the economy by distorting it, using
the application of “buying power” through use of unproductive, imaginary capital of stolen paper
money. Communism is incompatible with capitalism, capitalism is synonymous with anarchy, and
anarchy is the opposite of communism, while communism is synonymous with state “spending”, so by
virtue of strict theory and logic, capitalism is mutually exclusive with an “active” state. Theoretically, the
state is an eternal threat to capitalism. This revelation invites the imagination of “true anarcho-
capitalists” who hypothetically take over a state government and do “good things” using a “bad system”.
Imagine making taxation voluntary and thereby transforming the state into a kind of collective insurance
policy!

ANALYSIS OF COMMUNIST VALUES AND SYMBOLISM

A few points are to be made in order to convey the concepts inherent in communism and
anarcho-communism.

1. Destruction of capitalism and money itself: the communist idea here is to integrate people into
communes according to the popular values they espouse. The more “inclusive” your values, the
ostensibly more “popular” you become. The supposed utility of this arrangement is to exert an
effort in maximizing “friends” who are really ideally just people who will fight alongside you as
“comrades in the communist revolution”… They want to institutionalize as meritorious the
“popular” saying “it’s not what you know, it’s who you know”. This is an overt appeal to the
 “virtues” of doing and ascribing to those slogans which you were from a young age, warned as
being truthful. The purpose is that if you are targeted and killed by communists for being and
doing things “unpopular or anti-communist” and are not securely enough on the “correct side of
history” in the “revolution” the communists can say “well, you should have known better if you
didn’t want to get killed!” They want to shove a forced version of social Darwinism in our face.
2. There are appeals to the virtue of “equality” not just at the surface level of financials and
finance, but at multiple levels of finance in general by claiming inherited “money” makes you
better in school “causally (not in terms of a correlation)”, and not just “actual money” but also
“perceived acceptance in money-making institutions” as an easy connection of the individual to
their race so better to abuse blacks especially by emotional “tugs on heartstrings” derived from
perceptions of ancestral slavery. Quotes like “don’t be a nerd, be with more women, no sausage
fests, you need more comrade friends because the revolution is on the horizon, start getting
mentally prepared for commune life, didn’t you see the mass-televized, George Soros-funded
Black Bloc riots getting so big, you know it will happen soon don’t you”? Inevitable outing of
truths like Flat Earth Theory will ultimately lay bare the inner sensitivities of embarrassment
among anti-communists about their being privileged and led to believe they could be an
astronaut if only they had really tried hard enough and this is what made them lose friends in
the process. They laugh and say “this is your own fault for being gullible enough to fall for
capitalist lies” so now that you’re “screwed by your own beloved institutions you better repent
and take action by going all-in for communism and join the Black Bloc riots and antifa even
without external financial assistance of George Soros-money because you now know that you
need comrade friends quickly if you do not want to starve in the communes, much less be
privileged enough to engage in essentially arranged marriage with someone you’ll probably have
to be forced into attraction with to produce mixed-race children if not simply slave yourself into
collective resource-sustaining of POC adoption facilities so as to leave the innocent POC children
innocent of your evil white influence in personal interaction with them”.
3. A la Kanye West, the goal is to sensationalize the rare occurrence of white-on-black police
brutality and “systemic white privilege and racism” to use whites as the punching back to render
them easy victims in communes using weaponized “white guilt” then recruit black communes by
zombifying them as pawns and falsely leading them to believe they’ll have a leg-up simply for
having the identity of a POC in the “inevitable” post-revolution communes to be established
whenever communism “wins against capitalism”.

ANALYSIS OF COMMUNISM VS ANARCHO-COMMUNISM: HOW THEY’RE REALLY THE SAME

The “anarchist” aspect of “anarcho-communism” (AnCom) involves supposedly “democratic

town halls” within each commune at which governmental policies are “voted on” with majority success
passing of “bills” or whatever, and this is not truly the elimination of a state, just “theoretically” an
easier way to increase the opportunities to join in on the mechanisms of the state. The only theoretical
advantage of AnCom over communism is that it could be easier to locate the corrupt state agents
among the population, depending on how big the communes are, compared to modern municipalities.
Surprisingly, AnComs are rarely willing to concede to reveal the sizes of their imagined “communes”,
much less the proposed mechanisms of trade and travel between these communes. It’s easy to imagine
systems whereby puppet agents, of “democratic” control over communes, are placed there artificially
and originally by, or subsequently “bought” by, large-scale corporate agents like Nike, who condone
“social awareness issues” like kneeling for the NFL National Anthem, and other such corporate entities
who were successful at manipulating states and their affairs among a regime of corporatocracy and
statism and currency inflation – basically the corporate neo-liberal monoliths. These neo-liberal entities
will push the agenda of “moneyless anarchist societies” a la AnCom, to bribe and blackmail
“democratically popular” puppets who are outspoken enough against “hateful” issues of an intelligent,
rebellious, and provocative nature. Rappers like Snoop Dogg, able to push the “most popular and
inclusive” of agendas, will certainly be among the types of people who will decide which issues are
important enough to “bring to a vote at town hall meetings” in their respective communes. There will
probably be secret uses of the internet to spread viral “cool dance moves”, to make it easier to spread
these selectively among puppets so they are the first to “look coolest at the club” and thereby gain more
superficial social media followers to make their governmental status more compelling to the masses.
This “anarchy” is not real anarchy – it is just a further evolution and escalation of statist control by big-
money entities, because those who were more successful under the statist regimes of corporatocracy
will gain still further, increased leverage over the masses by this supposedly-anarchist form of
communism (AnCom). Money will be traded behind a huge veil of perhaps 100,000 to a million
members of an illuminati-esque secret society. Lots of modern rappers and pop stars do weird hand
gestures already, so it seems likely that their controllers have them convinced already that they’re
members of this secret club such that they’re unlikely to spread and divulge secrets given to them in
confidence by their masters and handlers. Therefore, small communes will certainly be controlled
secretly by a larger network of currency-smugglers in the black market of banned money and
information-based bribery. AnCom is thus not anarchy, it is the opposite of anarchy. It is a ploy to deliver
a bigger and more sinister, deceptive, trickster version of Full Globalist Communism.

ANCOM AS DOUBLE ENEMY

As both a National Socialist and AnCap, my “double enemy” is the unprincipled “anarchist” who
simultaneously considers himself a communist, and in this sense, for me, the common prayer to God:
“Please make my enemies ridiculous” has been answered! So it is that the Anarcho-Communists are
ridiculous! AnComs can be destroyed by strict logical application of the Hoppean ethics of “rights” as
they apply to the institution of “argumentation”. By virtue of such “logical destruction”, I shall argue that
the divergence from reason required to continue in pursuit of AnCom ideals is grave enough to render
persistent AnComs, who deem their ideologies as “surviving” the application of such logic, essentially
non-human in the alienness of their minds – necessitating their fascist removal and physical segregation!
The “assumption” for any “reasonable” pursuit of the practice called “argumentation” or procedural
conversation and general dialogue is that I am actively granting and conceding a range of “rights” to you,
my partner in “arguing”. I am allowing you a “contractual” share in “property rights” in the area on
which you stand, or in the chair on which you sit. This involves cooperation in the idea of private or
public property ownership. If you proceed to call yourself an “AnCom”, you are already admitting your
own logical absurdity. To be communist, you must either concede decision-making in “property-use” to
an oligarchic authority structure, in which case you are automatically and emphatically not an anarchist,
or you must pursue your absurdity otherwise, namely by proposing that every single human in the world
give consent, in their capacity as equal owners of the property you stand upon, for you to stand upon
said property. Indeed, what I am saying is that real communism, for practical purposes, cannot be
anarchist – you require an authority of some oligarchic nature. You are an oligarchist, not an anarchist!
You are here with me arguing by virtue of standing on property, and you are logically inconsistent and
unprincipled as an “AnCom” if you have not gotten consent from everyone in the world to use that chair
you’re sitting in, and by virtue of not getting such permission, you are defeating your own argument!
Besides the argument about “property”, AnComs believe they are “making an argument” by proposing
the right to use violence, especially in pursuit of other peoples’ property. If they aim to seize rich
peoples’ property, who must absolutely decide “how rich” the victims must be? Everyone in the world!
Otherwise, you are not an anarchist if you concede that an oligarchic regime must have the final
authority to make and enforce such decisions! You are not an anarchist, you are an oligarchist! If we
proceed to ignore this, then we come to the idea of egalitarianism in the application of violence upon
the physical scenario of engaging in an “argument”. You are undermining your own philosophy by not
ripping out my throat – you are conceding ownership of my own body. To what extent property is
personal as opposed to private, is a decision which must be made necessarily by an oligarchy, even if
presuming to manufacture consent “democratically”. Therefore you are not an anarchist, you’re a
pseudo-religious freak known as a “democrat”. If you advocate violence upon those that hinder your
divine communist quest, why are you undermining your own argument by not eliminating my life force
as someone who is, by virtue of arguing with you, hindering you? You are supporting my argument as a
NatSoc that we “get this show on the road” and, perhaps violently segregate! Then draw the lines of
war, as you are bully, looking for a fight, and “cruising for a bruising” physically, by calling yourself
communist, and intellectually, by claiming simultaneously to be “anarchist”. I can read through your
rhetoric and imagine the spontaneous arrival of a microlocalized “communist revolution”, especially
through your appeals to “chaos” by being an unprincipled “anarchist”. There is no arguing with you! If I
am a NatSoc, you will proceed to beat me up as you are programmed to do by your “democratic-
anarchist-oligarchy” gang. You are initiating violence on my mind by being illogical firstly, and under
auspices of boundary-dissolving LSD consumption, your mind and body conceptions will become one
and you will proceed to kill me! You are an animal and I must cage you or advocate your quarantining as
a beastly subhuman.

INVESTMENT IN ANCOM

The types of people who are most successful at taking advantage of corrupt machinery
characteristic of modern corporate statism, have the most to gain through investment in
AnCom/communist ideals because, under communism, the forms of mass control they shall be privy to,
will surpass that which can be commanded by simple modern currency translations of a globalist nature.
Under future globalist communism, these types of elites will be able to pry deeply into social institutions
and have more permanent access to secret societies, which will wield more power. The black market,
which will arise from currency bans, will increase the profit of having and distributing that currency,
against the law, by virtue of the increased risk of incarceration in doing business in such a black market,
against the backdrop of cost of potential imprisonment. Just as gangs form around illegal drugs, so shall
they form around gold coins. Transfer of coins will govern power-plays among secret societies, and
bribery and blackmail shall reign supreme over commune governors, who systematically impose mass
control using “democratic votes” or polls. This is basically already happening on a less-serious scale with
people who invest heavily in China using United States currency to “buy out” the Chinese government
and make their money back many times over by selling Chinese products made with cheaper labor back
into the United States markets. This is why so much energy is being spent opposing Trump’s tariffs. The
super rich see other rich people scheming like this and know that communist revolutions are “scheduled
to occur”, so instead of becoming fascist against leftists of all sorts, like they should do if they had any
courage, they make it obvious that they’re scared, and take the easy route, by throwing money at
globalist corporations, in order to create an electronic record, which shall show any interested
communists “on the eve of the revolution” how desperately they tried to allocate their money-power in
ways which support the globalist communist schemes. In this way, these super rich people are able to
more easily buy their way into positions of greater commune influence, and access more food and
control of gangs of “local AnCom government.”

VANDALISM AND COMMUNISM

There’s a profound not-so-secret connection behind the AnCom themes of: vandalism,
glorification of labor, and illegal immigrant labor. Basically, the same people who support the giving of
jobs to illegal immigrants are also those in support of the glorifying of manual labor in general, and I’m
certain that the people who staunchly support both of these issues are also – perhaps more secretly –
advocates of vandalism, in the spirit of Keynesian economic stimulation, whereby destruction
necessitates the job of construction. This is all inherently tied into the mechanism of white genocide.
This genocidal mechanism involves forced dependence on illegal immigrants – perhaps forever – by
virtue of private property destruction, intended to drive up the cost of profitability of supplying manual
labor, which is increasingly supplied more exclusively by illegal immigrants. The indigenous white
inhabitants of “white countries” are encouraged to go to school instead of learning mechanics and
construction, so the intruders, who only speak a foreign language, have more bargaining power and can
more easily form labor unions, to steal all the “white” peoples’ money by simply bombing their houses
and businesses, so that those “white” people are forced into doing business with them, as they are the
only people who still know how to rebuild stuff. In an “all-white” community, it’s very likely that no
vandalism will ever occur, so the need to provide repair-labor will be diminished, because practically
nothing will ever get broken. We are indeed approaching the development in technology whereby the
only requirements for repair of property will come from deliberate sabotage, because the quality of all
machinery will be so high that nothing will ever malfunction by accident. Or else, the cost of total
replacement by fully legitimate channels will become so low as to undermine the logic associated with
repair in general. Vandalism is, therefore, an elaborate form of racial violence against “whites” in
particular.

FALSE CAPITALISM CONSPIRACY

AnComs will insist that the current US situation involving the Chinese communist party practices
of using government to control the market through sponsorship of key industries and corporate welfare
(“too big to fail”) using funds stolen from the people at gunpoint (taxation-extortion) qualify as an
“endgame of capitalism” or at least do not qualify as “real” or “anarchist” communism. However, as an
AnCap, I will counter this by insisting that government interference in the market is completely
incompatible with real free-market capitalism and is obviously not anarchist in any way. I will venture to
redefine communism to include what I will henceforth refer to as “proto-communism” or “proto-
AnCom” as government interference in the market which serves the purpose of casting a false
capitalism in a negative light, thereby serving to bolster arguments in favor of a redeeming communism
or AnCom. Therefore, all government intrusion in the market is not the “result of capitalism” but rather
is the “beginning of communism” by virtue of its insistence upon further communist goals of central
government planning, interfering in the market and making it less free and true. AnComs insist that “real
AnCom” includes a global ban on money, but this is ridiculous as obviously a black market of gold coins
shall emerge, increasing authoritarian redistribution of wealth – not decreasing it. AnCom is obviously a
false form of anarchy.

FEDERAL RESERVE MALINVESTMENT

The way the Federal Reserve affects the judgments about how to invest loans is inviting
government correction, exacerbating an inevitable crisis which is being saved for the right political
regimes to ease the acceptance of communism. When the Federal Reserve artificially lowers interest
percentages, those supposed “capitalists” with command over large amounts of loan-dollars are
encouraged to invest unrealistically because of the artificial illusion of prosperity – they suddenly have
the anti-capitalistic courage to make expensive, non-liquidable, long-term investments. This redirects
labor and manpower of unfortunate humans to work on the wrong projects! Especially when the
government sponsors the industries supplying said “wrong projects”, businessmen are tricked into
financing them when, in reality, the projects which are in demand are those that produce cheaper,
consumable, short-term liquidable assets. The ratio of consumption to savings of goods and money is
“thrown out of whack” by the criminal activity of the Federal Reserve creating false promises. The
masses don’t really want what’s being created, and they are paid excess money, for participating in
wrongly-financed large projects, as wages, then use this excess money to buy what’s in demand but was
never properly invested in, so the cheap consumable products get way too expensive due to low supply
and high demand, and thus the masses experience reduced quality of life. Communism then becomes
more acceptable by the masses!

MODERN LIBERAL DECEIT

Modern liberals are deceitful when they use arguments for the “public good” as reason to
increase taxes in the short term. They are exposed as sleeper cells for communist revolution by
undermining the forces that argue for capitalism – namely, profit motive in doing business with privately
owned property. They are not engaged in a fight for the “public good” in actuality, but rather are
seeking to sequester wealth in the short term for privileged businesses and special interests which are
wealthy and well-connected enough to find themselves in cahoots with government, politicians, and the
schemes of Federal Reserve currency-printing and redirection and redistribution of wealth through
application of wealth selectively upon the market through taxation. The genuine idea of “public good” is
actively undermined and used as a scapegoat to redirect wealth to the ultra elite plutocrats (oligarchy)
who intend to squeeze more value out of the money they get by using/investing it “sooner rather than
later”, in order to achieve and artificial unfair competitive advantage for themselves in the business
market. These “controllers” (politicians, bureaucrats, plutocrats, oligarchs) are primarily interested in
increasing their control over the business market, so they want to be first to use their new, ill-gotten
gains for their own investment interests in order to command resources at a lower cost and earlier
issuance than the rest of society whom they have “beaten to the market”, and whom must “follow their
lead”, so to speak. The trick they pull on Liberal Democratic voters, who presumably don’t know about
the ulterior motives of solidifying and officializing oligarchy via communism, is to appeal to the urgency
and time-dependent desperation of the plight of “dependents” they presume to “care for”, which in
effect undermines the more solid/sound strategy of Republicans for the “public good in the long term”
by reducing tax percentage burdens on all business as a method of encouraging larger profits via self-
investment, thereby increasing the pool of taxable dollars, which increases overall tax revenue, despite
long term lowered tax percentages. They use democracy to their advantage because they know the
masses are mostly too stupid to conceive of the Republican strategy, so they get easy votes from idiots
who favor the rush to steal more money so they can assume the more high-ground of the Robin-Hood-
role and get even more cheap votes by inflating egos and getting more popular by televising what they
did with the government’s tax revenue budget to make people fall for the trick even further by
supporting more tax percentage increases. But the glue that really holds together this scam against the
Republican “public good” strategy is the envy and hatred of the masses felt for their bosses, which
generally encourages them to “punish success” and disallow the granting of any freedom of
reinvestment in one’s own business, despite the obvious argument about increased, overall pools of
taxable dollars which increase tax revenue despite lower tax percentage. The Leftist masses are so full of
hate, they subordinate the “public good” to their desires to damage and sabotage business owners and
all moderately wealthy people whom they feel outrageous envy towards. The elite controllers of
government take advantage of this hate and envy to steal prosperity from everyone in the world
eternally and to fulfill their prophecy of Hell on Earth. The “descent into Hell” has its mechanics in the
process of a ratchet-wrench effect which makes an argument against the lowering of government
expenditure of tax revenue in the budget, through an appeal to the “established” nature of the
handouts. The money “can’t be taken away” from the purpose to which it was assigned, because that
would be seen as “cruel”. So political Democratic voting sets up a ratcheting mechanism where only
“further progress” is possible, and budgets cannot be reduced. The Robin-hood-agenda of tax increases
reduces the profitability of business in general and makes it harder to self-reinvest and produce profits,
so profits decrease in general. Accordingly, tax revenue goes down, because the ultra rich get richer and
are fewer in number, so the higher percentage assigned to them doesn’t account for the higher number
of less-rich but still quite-rich people from which market power was stolen! An “emergency” is inevitably
observed where tax revenue is insufficient to cover the ongoing budget of current government
programs. This invites the inevitable “progression” of never-ending tax percentage increases, which, for
reasons outlined above, shift money and power to the ultra rich still more! This brings us closer to the
communist global apocalypse. Because there is a global, spatial, interlocking ratchet mechanism in the
institution of the US dollar as the global reserve currency. This ensures that when the US “goes to
communist Hell”, the trap is then triggered to send the whole world into global communist Hell. And the
insane national debt will not properly be blamed on democracy and the Federal Reserve inflations, but
instead will be blamed on “capitalism” and the “institution of money itself” as a convenient argument in
favor of communism.

EVILS OF DEMOCRACY

In our evaluation of history and our plans for the future, I believe our most clearly-defined
enemy and “source of all evils” is certainly “democracy”. The “bad guys” of history who “fought on the
wrong side” should certainly be those who “fought in the name of democracy”. The implications are
drastic enough, having said that, but more must be said about the Stalinist Communists who weren’t
really “democratic”. But, on the other hand, the communists were favored by England’s democracy
because they were considered a “special case of democracy”. So, to say more, they may not have had
“one-vote-per-person” regular elections, but the Communists were clearly allied with the major
democracies, and their whole agenda revolves around a regime that claims to represent every person
individually and to force equality, so, in a sense, communism is the “adult” if democracy is the
“adolescent”. Communism is the forced version of what democracy attempts (and succeeds) to smuggle
into “legitimacy” by virtue of “consent of the governed”, which is presumed to be manufactured by
head-counting individual preferences in a scheme of “unqualified franchise”, where everyone, by virtue
of being human, is assumed to have the faculties to even have a good idea of their own preference,
much less the “correct” preference from among a set of options arranged for them by oligarchs and
bureaucrats whose position is no different than communist dictators, except for superficial
circumstances of arriving to said position. Democracy is more devastating for any society, in the long
run, than dictatorship. The ease with which public consent for a revolution, in the short term, may be
successfully manufactured, if necessary, is of great importance. Democracy gives the police and military
an easy excuse for following orders: “this is the best reflection of the society’s choice, so I must obey!”
People who question the authenticity of “elections” are inevitably labeled “conspiracy freaks”. I insist
that the general, obvious tendency of “republicans” to be more consistently honest is due to their
character – deriving from the decision not to take the easy, politically correct, popular label “democrat”.
The German National Socialists of history would just be Republicans in modern America. This is because
they realize the highest enemy is democracy and all those who are “true believers” in it. Anyone who
openly announces democracy as their enemy is, as the enemy of my enemy, my friend! Even if real
democracy, as in the case where everyone votes on every issue, were possible, it would be undesirable,
because everyone would have to forego social involvements in allowance for studying as policy experts.

Another grave danger of democracies is that, in their claim that democracies don’t go to war
with other democracies, any regime that resists the inherent extortion of democracy will probably be on
a list of states to go to war with. If a state doesn’t join the hegemonic monopoly-cartel of “democracies”
it will soon be devastated by war, because democracies are notorious for creating hoaxes to go to war
with non-democratic regimes. For examples, the Holocaust, 9/11, alleged Khashoggi journalist murder,
etc. Interventionist democracies, i.e., all democracies, are inevitably on a path toward a NOW global
government, because otherwise, a “state of anarchy” exists internationally without a “government” to
oversee the conflicts between governments. Secessionist movements, which are certainly necessary
under a global government, will be desperate and bloody. Imagine a global government with no rival
government to deter its use of nukes with nukes of its own. One can easily conjure images of news
media listing apologetics for the global government deciding to nuke a city in which “secessionist
terrorists” were committing “atrocities”. The democratic NOW would say instant nuclear deaths of
innocents is excusable in the context of pursuing the extermination of “secessionist terrorists”
committing “atrocities”.

TO THOSE PREDISPOSED TO REGULAR CAPITALISM

You and your favored politicians may enjoy calling yourself a “capitalist” but this only means
that you “believe in capitalist principles” and it is utterly impossible to “be a capitalist” because you are,
in fact, a subject of a communist system, and whether you like it or not, you will always “be a
communist”, unless we abolish the Federal Reserve. The best definition of “communism” is government-
planned economy, as opposed to a free market. It is, in reality, a communist conspiracy to label our
economy “capitalist”, because the false labeling of a corrupt system invites the favoring of a false
alternative (communism) as an attempt to rescue the system, thereby inviting a conspiracy of increased
corruption – or “more of the same”. The entire system we like to consider “capitalist” is based on the
dollar, which is centrally-planned and manipulated by the government. Our entire economy is a charade,
it is a false microcosm of capitalism which is planned in a communist way! We are living under extreme
communism, and there is no escape! If you try to “rescue capitalism” by freely choosing your currency,
you will be pursued by law enforcement officers under charges of counterfeiting, and if you resist this
tyrannical kidnapping called arrest, you will rapidly escalate to being shot and killed! You are being
forced to be a communist under threat of gunfire!

COMMUNISM VS ANARCHO-COMMUNISM

In pure philosophical terms, the supposed advantage of AnCom over Communism is that AnCom
uses miniature, supposedly “democratic” versions of the state in town halls or whatever, to make
centrally-planned economies, which theoretically increases popular access to decision-making,
compared to nation-wide planning by regular “authoritarian communism” as distinct from AnCom. I
counter this argument to say AnCom is inherently contradictory, because communism (centrally-
planned economy) is incompatible with anarchy because in real anarchy, the rule-makers must be more
like bosses that can be competitively chosen by employees in a free-market through voluntary contracts.
AnComs hate bosses so much, but their philosophy insists on something worse than bosses, which is
commune-rulers, who dictate economies through plutocrats, introducing a free-market-violating
monopoly in each commune. AnCap hedges against monopolies because bosses engage in competition
for employees. Anarchy implies a system without “unjustified rulers” and obviously bosses are “justified
rule-makers” and I insist that the inevitable reality of AnCom is a system whereby plutocrats
“unjustifiably rule” behind a veil of false “democracy”.

COUNTER-CULTURE AND MULTICULTURE IN GANGS DRUGS GUNS AND POLITICS

Prohibition: gangs use government laws to protect their profits via illegalization of drugs which
open chakras that will always fulfill spiritual demand. This is done in order to take advantage of a super-
stable drug market, i.e. humans will always want to buy drugs.

There used to be a monoculture when racism wasn’t sensationalized, but globalists bribed
national leaders worldwide to instigate harsh conditions in foreign nations to import “other cultures”
and used mind-controlling of POC to trick them into thinking they’re different enough to constitute
another, separate “culture”.

When these ostensibly different cultures exhibit any degree of “natural segregation” then
“multiculturalism” can be promoted as being virtuous and the drug-supply-chains to segregated
communities can develop “latino gangs” and “black gangs” and “asian gangs” such that the ulterior
motive is revealed to actually be white genocide when no gang is ever labeled “racist” unless it is a
“white gang” formed for the purpose of supplying illegal drugs to white communities. This inhibits the
ability of white people to obtain low-cost drugs to ascend their chakras and gain spiritual awareness.

Suspiciously, there was no prohibition and no “multicultural gangs” and no “illegal drugs” until
after 1900 when communism got started and dominated Russia, Britain, France, etc. This suggests a
globalist conspiracy over 100 years ago began by using communism as both a tool and a goal for evil
designs.

Regarding white genocide and communism, the plan is to talk about and promote the ideas of
white privilege and white guilt, use “blacks” as pawns by tricking them into attempting to win deserved
payback for their ancestors by mentally and literally enslaving whites using blame and shame games to
combat “institutional and systemic racism to flip the script to give “blacks” an unfair advantage within a
“multicultural” commune which “whites” must join in order to attempt to avoid being called racist. If
they do not at least make this attempt, they will obviously be called racist. Obviously this is rigged and
there is truly no way out of being called “racist”.

Gangs may be understood as not unlike “microcosms of communes” and POC and colored gangs
are not racist for excluding whites, but an all-white commune or gang is indeed racist due to a double
standard selectively applied to whites, supposedly deservedly, as they are the established punching bag.
The first and foremost goal of all communes is to seek out and destroy all racist or white communes
because it is supposedly “virtuous” to do so, and thereby beneficial to popular standing of the social
reflection of each commune which obediently engages in the destruction of racist or white communes
or gangs.

Ultimately, whites must become slaves in multicultural communes or die, according to

communists. Under communism, multiculturalism is literally white genocide.

POC gangs like MS-13, Crips, Bloods, etc. vote LEFTIST so their customers can afford the drug
lifestyle offered by them, to them, via “welfare” and thereby systematically reduce the viability of small
companies, using minimum wage hikes, to stifle competition for control of the lifestyle of the poor
captives of this gang behavior.

The idea is to get Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) types on psychiatric medication for enabling the
arbitrary ad hominem attack of declaring that they engage in “crazy talk” upon any exposure to these AA
psych med types speaking in ways reminiscent of anti-communist rants or positive propaganda as in this
book you are reading.

MAKING LIFE HARDER FOR OUTSIDERS: WHAT LEFT SAYS RIGHT DOES

The left tries to coerce government theft from supposed “haves” to give to “have-nots” –
thereby increasing authoritarianism in government which says “we will take care of all social problems
using force of paid agents with guns… Just give us your money and we’ll take a big cut and you might
never even realize how big our cut was!”

Government says: “If you don’t let us steal from you, you obviously don’t care about your fellow
citizen. We don’t care about why the private sector is unequipped to handle charity because any
investigation into that might reveal a deeper systemic problem about Federal Reserve currency itself
which, at high levels, we are intimately invested in hiding. So we will use the poor conditions of human
finance we probably created with “Big Government” as an excuse to make Government even Bigger to
make those conditions even worse so Government can get Still Bigger, hopefully eventually making
everyone so crazy they believe that their craziness requires repealing the Second Amendment so better
to facilitate foreign communist takeover – physical and mental takeover – mental in terms of acceptance
of “equality” through spreading poorness and poverty and sacrifice of money and technology in favor of
primitive communist existence in which we all deserve to live as poorly as the poorest among us and all
self-motivation has been eradicated long enough to collectively admit “inferiority to Chinese due to
ethnicity and because they’ve been communist longer than us, until the truth of globalist government
conspiracy of using “capitalism and money” together with communist trade wars against us using clever
liberal tactics of authoritarianism, makes us submit and roll over and accept that it was, all along, a game
of national wit and “those smart Chinese” beat us “fair and square” (just like in mathematics class). So
all my social programming makes me feel dumb and privileged and undeserving so I beg for the honor of
becoming a slave to my superior Chinese masters because I obviously deserve death for giving up my
liberty so easily like my founding fathers warned me against.”

On the other hand, maybe if we keep our money and decide how to use it ourselves, instead of
trusting politicians, the free market would create clever advertising methods to incentivize charity so the
private sector would get stronger and even more capable of helping the poor and crippled and would
enjoy additional business health when people know which small businesses helped their loved ones.
Marketing nationwide would eventually become a game of who can help people the most!

Indeed, helping leeches suck your blood only helps them temporarily and, in the long term, both
host and parasite die. But if you avoid the leeches long enough to herd cattle, you may soon sustain life
for all leeches forever.

The Far-Left will say things about how they are all true believers in the communist revolution
because if one does not believe, it will mean their death. Abolition of all money everywhere will mean
that the value of your life depends on the technological artifacts found in your commune, like
smartphones for communes in America, especially. They say they know you greedy capitalists love your
toys so much that you believe life is about dollar value vs the Mexican Peso and you do not subscribe to
the common sense notion that having a job, family and friends, matters most in life. When communism
“hits” the USA and Mexico, the Mexicans will therefore have it “harder” than you Americans. This is
because of smartphones… or something… Therefore, the value of the dollar is related to the relative
privilege you shall enjoy on the eve of the communist revolution. So we charge you with the
responsibility of “resisting” Trump and letting all those poor foreigners cross our borders because
borders are obviously evil under communism.

MONARCHY AND NATIONALISM

Under Feudalism the Kings or Monarchs had a way of being which ensured that the reality of
war was based on relatively small territorial disputes and there were no costly “total wars” driven by, for
instance, “spreading democratic ideals and virtues”.

The French Revolution was planned to monopolize the otherwise free market of kingship. This
free market of kingship would originally guard against the ability of a King or Monarch to be the ultimate
judge in disputes of private property ownership and of finding the true facts in matters of atrocity vs
justice.

Theoretically there could be a leader who is a “good king” like a Fuehrer, who is a leader that
acts as supreme free market advocate. This leader would essentially be a king overseeing “socialist”
endeavors with a heavily skeptical and trained eye. This leader could iron out imperfections in a free
market to make it more free. Imagine an anarchist gaining an authoritarian role. Remember the biggest
quote of “Salt Lake City Punks” about how “the best way to destroy the system is to join the system and
dismantle it from the inside”. Imagine Donald Trump playing as the referee in a wrestling match to break
up monopolies!

It would be better to have a publicly known “selective society” like in an honest inherited
monarchy, than to allow a secret society of plutocrats to bribe public caretakers in conspiratorial
fashion.

A “socialist king” in the non-pejorative sense, may efficiently oversee a free market using a
grievance-based notification system to respond to naturally arising problems in the free market using
creative solutions like a referee and rule-maker in one.

I submit to the reader that the words “socialism” and “liberalism” have been STOLEN from us by
the Left. “Socialism” could be anti-democratic, but the Left has stolen and adopted “democratic
socialism” as a conduit towards full globalist communism. Jeffersonian “classical liberalism” in the
distant past used to refer to keeping government force out of social issues, but Leftists have adopted
“modern liberalism” to mean quite the opposite – they want to use government force to mold society
the way they see fit. For example, “classical liberalism” means BOTH no government policies regarding
drug use nor a state monopoly on the servicing of the industries in welfare, affirmative action
endeavors, and creation of gay rights policies. The idea of classical liberalism would be to let “social ills”
produce crimes NATURALLY and then pursue charges wrought by them NATURALLY without labels of
“hate” and “driving under the influence (DUI)” etc.

National Socialists (NatSocs) seek to use “socialism” as a word in a non-democratic fashion as a

tool to speed up the progress toward a truly free market more quickly than it could emerge “organically”
with absolutely no “authoritarian intervention”.

Democratic socialists (DemSocs) are the enemy of NatSocs because they want to deliver the
supreme power of wealth redistribution into the hands of a secret society of politician-bribing plutocrat
oligarchs who control what is labeled “popular” vs “hateful”.

A famous British quote says “If fascism ever comes to America, it will be called anti-fascism.”
Basically the idea of antifa is that if you don’t admit guilt to racism due to benefitting from a systemic
racist institution, then you are inherently racist. This is a trick to render you susceptible to being beat up
because if you call yourself racist, you are admitting you need a beating because one could record a
video of you saying “I am racist” and then show it to antifa to blackmail you potentially. If you don’t
submit to this forceful blackmail control tactic, then you deserve to be beaten up because you are
denying the reality of the institutionally racist system. These tactics are even now being embraced by
types like Elizabeth Warren, Nancy Pelosi, and Beto O’Rourke.

DEFENDING THE RULE OF LAW AGAINST INSTITUTIONALIZED ANARCHY

It’s important to defend the rule of law because there is a slippery slope related to the
redefining of what is fascist, e.g., saying “Go back to Mexico” to a Spanish-only-speaking undocumented
immigrant aka illegal alien, is indefensible to antifa due to their appeal to labeling the law itself immoral.
This dismantles the defense of calling out illegal border-crossing behavior with any indignant language.
This, for example, can create a slippery slope leading toward a state of affairs in which the position of
being overtly anti-pedophile, is to be labeled as an openly-fascist attitude. This is simply due to the
appeal to the illegal nature of pedophilia in the context of looking at legality in a generally unfavorable
light. This is the simple-minded backdrop of considering “law” in general as categorically “evil”. This
motivates antifa to fight against anything which is in line with a positive reinforcement of what the “law”
advocates, such as being anti-pedophilia. The endgame of this slippery slope as I have portrayed it, is to
conceive the highly dubious assertion which proposes the validity of “institutionalized anarchy” and it is
easy to see how the super-elite shall profit by supporting this method, plutocratically using George Soros
money, for example. This slippery slope mechanism toward “institutionalized anarchy” which is created
through control over minds by dominating antifa-sentiments, in fact DOUBLES the amount of control
which the plutocratic super-elite may exert over the masses. This is in my opinion because the super-
elite under these auspices, shall exercise control over antifa physically using “legitimate law
enforcement” in an effort to impose order from one direction of the spectrum, while they
simultaneously exercise force from the opposite direction, of chaos, by controlling the “law-abiding
citizens” by directing the policies of the puppet leaders of antifa, who are instructed by said elites to
threaten the law-abiding masses with accusations of being fascist and thereby of deserving a beating by
POC by virtue of not joining the allegedly anti-fascist movement which requires anyone who “isn’t
fascist” to join riots against police and businesses. This is easily achieved through an appeal to the saying
that “if you’re not with us, you’re against us” leading to “join or die” which is probably the same old
tactic used to rally the masses in a negative way during the dubious French Revolution.

The Far-Left says, “stop the white insanity at its source by simply having mixed kids so there are
no more white people, thereby automatically ending all paranoia associated with white genocide by
getting the inevitable OVER WITH ALREADY!” The virtue is alleged to exist whereby parental similarity to
offspring is systematically maligned selectively toward the recessive genotypes and phenotypes in order
to more easily bully them into slavery and genocide, rendering their possessions and valuables and labor
easily stolen!

If you are of similar genotype and phenotype to arguably-objectively more attractive females,
you are maligned for being subconsciously fascist for being attracted to them, and are therefore
psychologically or biologically or unintentionally racist. So you had “better go ahead and admit to being
racist” for blackmail purposes by antifa, or else you are IGNORING RACISM, and everyone knows, and
therefore must agree with and submit to the interpretations, favoring our cause, of the old saying,
“those who IGNORE EVIL are GUILTY of evil!”

ZIONIST ENDGAME DISCUSSIONS

Super-elite, banker puppet-master plutocratic Zionists’ engame is to repeat the controversial

aspect of Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ involving Pontius Pilate’s Jewish Inquisition of the
conspiracy to “kill God” – namely in the interpretation where deicide is committed against the genotype
and phenotype that can objectively be said to have “created civilization and modern humanity” and to
fulfill an act of replacing Goy-cattle as the race “chosen by God” to represent or in fact ostensibly “be
God”. This shall culminate in the replacement of said “master race” with their own Hebrew race through
a barbaric methodology involving the ultimate goal of globalist-communist-sponsored white genocide.

The Charlottesville chant “you will not replace us” is given fresh context in light of the perceived
globalist-communist goal of ethnic cleansing of whites by Zionist elites. The collective position of
“master race” is a theoretical one of very tenuous proportions when another race is potentially
scheming over many generations to assert themselves as the replacements to fill such a dubious
position. The German National Socialists likely had become aware of their current qualifications as
members of the apparently-coveted and burdensome position of “master race” and it is reasonable to
conceive of ideological sympathy with their potentially or ostensibly over-reaching and over-reactive
movement.

ALEX JONES, EXAMINATION OF SELECT CONTRIBUTIONS

It is useful to examine the implications of the assertion by Alex Jones that heavy psychedelics
were consumed by the ultra-elite as many as 100 years ago, lending perspective to the crazy
parapsychologies of the likes of Hitler, Stalin, and Mao. These crazies were according to Alex Jones,
injecting DMT and meth among other things. It is safe to say that, mostly as a result of their drug choice,
the ultra-elite are spiritually Gnostic. This certainly has a bearing on their modified behavior,
motivations, and attitudes relative to regular people, religious and atheist alike. Timothy Leary was
certainly a CIA agent, and Charles Manson was closely related to both he and Aldous Huxley: not
surprisingly, Manson was interviewed extensively and mass-televized unlike virtually all other criminals
because it would seem that he was used as some special kind of government eperimental example,
probably closely related to the CIA program MKULTRA, and it seems likely that the elite are somehow
invested in encouraging us to contemplate globalist vs nationalist issues raised by the proposal of an
eminent communist revolution. This makes a lot of sense when you sufficiently analyze the objective
reality of plutocratic families projecting their issues – i.e., issues that inevitably arise in the sophisticated
mind of a serious political science major with unlimited money who is well aware of the principles
involved in National Socialism vs Communism, and who is concerned with their implications on cultures
of nations and ways to address reactions among the common folk via mainstream media, for example.
This basically relates to the plutocrats’ democratic (collective and competing) control over the highest
globalist circles of information and intelligence and government power – namely the potential of good
vs bad plutocrats, i.e., some plutocrats that favor National Socialism, others that prefer Zionism,
Communism, Democratic Socialism, etc.

It seems that David Koresh of the Branch Davidians was as much a psychedelic CIA experimental
example as Charles Manson, and it seems Koresh was aware of the endgame of Zionism. The overall goal
of Zionism seems to be the vague concept of “granting Shekels” (Shekels roughly translating to possibly
virtually infinite amounts of currencies from a variety of desired destination nations) to the pockets of
young traveling bachelors with a birthright citizenship to the Jewish nation of Israel, granted by
genetically verified lineage supposedly and questionably related to King David. The obvious goal of this is
to produce a generation of young Jews who quite literally have the world as their oyster.

The super-elite possessing genetics related to King David are certainly placing bets on whether
the masses will remain sheep and remain docile in the face of white genocide, or fight back. This kind of
betting has certainly been ongoing since before the internet was invented – and interestingly it is known
that the internet was created by computer nerds in Silicon Valley who had widely ingested large
amounts of LSD and were presumably invested in allowing us to find each other to plan out a strategy to
defend against globalism and related conspiratorial evils. This strategy is the spirit of 4Chan’s “Pol”
forum.

DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISM VS COMMUNISM

The manifestation of communism in America will most realistically arrive in the form of
Democratic Socialism, which is certainly to say, in a top-down manner. The difference between nation-
wide authoritarian communism and Democratic Socialism is mostly nominal, in that the “true rulers” will
either be known by name, in the case of idealized communism, or will be shrouded by a veil of
supposedly democratically-elected puppets, in the case of Democratic Socialism. In either case, the “Iron
Law of Oligarchy” will inevitably be seen to apply, so that it’s easy for most people to understand that,
for better or worse, the necessary label most appropriate for both communism and Democratic
Socialism shall be “oligarchic rule”. Those of us on the Far-Right with no confidence in the benevolence
of leftist oligarchies should hopefully recognize that the more desirable alternative, or lesser of two
evils, is regular communist dictatorship and not Democratic Socialism. The desirability derives from the
case of carrying out an effective inevitable revolution when you know who the enemy’s leader is,
compared to anonymous puppet masters controlling plutocratically. The scariness of Democratic
Socialism derives from the complications of attacking mere puppets among a vast regime – namely the
possibility of a ban on guns when assassinations begin, which would possibly initiate eternal
enslavement as an accidental backfire. I predict that the masses of leftists will increasingly understand
these considerations, regarding revolution complications and plutocratic corruption, inherent to the
authoritarian variants on the left, i.e. communism and Democratic Socialism. They are thus generally
intuitively sensible to anti-authoritarian logic, despite their spiritual void of hatred which inspires an
inherent aversion to the right wing – probably an artifact of social aversion to right-wing example
specimens which they have been inauspiciously exposed to. I predict that it will become increasingly
more common to call oneself a “left-leaning libertarian” or “anarcho-communist”, and the motivations
for doing so are interesting to discuss. They accuse right-wingers of wanting to join the ranks of the
ruling class, yet they seem motivated to do exactly that themselves, in an easier, short-cut manner, as
“AnComs” who run something akin to “democratically-controlled town halls” as decision-making centers
for each commune. They certainly aspire to hold offices of some sort, perhaps for communication with
neighboring communes for “bartering” to avoid descent into primitivism. Otherwise, their motivations
are most likely to use “AnCom” as a way to legitimize theft of “means of production” aka rich peoples’
property. In this sense they are glorified gangsters. They want to ban money, which will never happen,
so they aren’t to be taken seriously as a physical force, but they are unpleasant to debate with. In short,
blind authoritarianism shall be even more rampant in AnCom than in regular communism!

ANTIFA AS INFINITE BULLY

Antifa reveals their desire to bully forever by denying negotiation to formally ostracize those
whom they call “fascists” and prefer instead to perpetually redefine fascism as anything “anti-antifa” so
they can force their opinions on others.

Obviously formal ostracism of fascists would certainly solve the problem of “closeted” racism
and fascism forever by revealing in all citizens their acceptance or denial of the opportunity to move to a
state in which fascism or racism is permitted. Basically it is obvious that “you cannot be racist if
everyone in your living area is of the same race.” This preliminary form of “temporary racist policy”
would essentially eradicate all instances of racist behavior indefinitely, but antifa absolutely denies this
truth.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe suggests that we must physically remove the antifa types not simply
because they’re truly communists trying to steal our private property, but because their aim is
ultimately systemic genocide of our genotypes and phenotypes. So basically one is left to label oneself
“fascist” even if one does not think one is fascist because one must oppose the antifa’s endeavors to
gain power by eventually forcing one to label oneself “fascist” through a systematic argument whereby
all whites qualify as institutionally fascist unless they openly identify as antifa themselves and proceed to
engage in active antifa activity, willingly or apparently so. Antifa is ideologically backing you into a corner
and they are generally aware of their own treachery but they are in no way sorry about it, because they
perceive their mission as something like divine – they are crusaders who transcend the limitations and
constraints of logic and morality. The pursuant enslavement along these lines relates to the necessity of
proving at all times that your white privilege has been thoroughly forfeited!

Trump is a self-described “nationalist” so if you don’t openly oppose him at every given
opportunity, you will be labeled “nationalist” or at least “nationalist sympathizer”. To oppose outright
globalism is to throw a wrench in the mechanisms of enslaving non-communist whites, so you will be
aggressively targeted as a “nazi” (which is slang for “nationalist”) who is or is not still in the closet. Along
the lines of this logic, antifa will logically cheat to overpower and corner you ruthlessly in ideological
warfare, through infinite appeals to identity politics and systemic or institutionalized “racism”.

MONEY AND UNEXPECTED POWER STRUCTURES

Money is only synonymous with power due to corrupt institutions established and protected by
government. Government wants us to be forced into doing business with anyone who has money.
Government wants us to become unable to decline the offering of goods and services to anyone for any
reason. Without government, the internet could quite obviously create many ways to validate identity
and positive or negative associations of anyone seeking transactions, and business and service providers
could then easily render “evil” people’s money powerless through the refusal to do business with them,
i.e., through various forms of the boycott.

My prediction is: openly communist agents funded by the likes of George Soros will protect the
usefulness of their money by “acting gay” and claiming “gay rights protections from discrimination” on
the “eve of the communist revolution.” This is why the liberals were so upset about the “bake the cake”
supreme court decision. Briefly, this decision claimed that Christian bakers were not required to bake a
cake depicting a gay marriage, presumably involving an unwanted promotion of a lifestyle they believe is
counter to their religious doctrines.

The reading deeply into language itself as in the calling out of people supposedly using “racist
dog whistles” is a preemptive step toward thought control, i.e., mind-control. When dog whistling
becomes commonly regarded as a real thing, the next step will be the asking of a controversial question
involving awkward topics like racism and to demonize the person being questioned if they hesitate or
react awkwardly or even start talking less. The questioner will claim that “this topic should not bother
you if you do not have a guilty conscience.” In this way, a negative vibe shift which would truly indicate
an unveiling of the questioner’s own ulterior motives can instead be projected onto you and allege to
indicate the “reality” that you are the one with something to hide, i.e., that you are the one with ulterior
motives.

EXPOSING SYNDICALIST COMMUNISTS

Communists shall hereby in the following, be exposed as “positivists” or apologists for the status
quo. They buck a fundamental law of economics by believing that monopolies are inherently good.
Hopefully we can say, to their credit, that they take issue with the concept, in the free market, of
consumers as “king”, and presumably they distrust those who own enough money to assume the role of
“consumer”, and we may say money’s “power to corrupt” makes undesirable despots/tyrants of
consumers who are generally considered “always right” by businesses (on the free market). Under a
monopoly, obviously the consumers have relatively less power and cannot readily assume the likeness
of “king”. Communists may concede increased power, inevitably shifting to the ultra-wealthy
controllers/owners/managers of the monopolized businesses, but may be ready to permit this as
“acceptable” in light of the “more important” aspect of increased authority shifting to the “laborers”
and the employees, whom are less beholden to the sway of consumer desires upon monopolization! It
may be important to understanding the mind of the communist, that they expect labor unions to have
more “power of bargaining”, under monopolized industries. The idea is that such a union may be
organized, more easily, to withhold perhaps an entire service of an economy, due to the fact that the
business, which the union strikes against, is the only business that supplies the service, hence the
“monopoly”. The mechanism of “bargaining power” would involve leaving the owners/managers
haplessly exposed to the helpless consumers, who demand from the monopoly business a service which
is not forthcoming. The idea behind such being “not forthcoming” is the supposed lack of back-ups or
strike-breakers. This would make decent sense in a society full of monopolized industries, because it
doesn’t seem likely that the business would pay bystanders not to actually do a job, but somehow to
train themselves to be able to do it at the drop of a hat. Presumably a union could locate such people
and get them to join the strike, because maintaining backups, if possible at all, would require “lower
management” which would oversee quality control of the backups, and these would be likely to join the
strike as workers themselves! Plus there’s the low likelihood of effective training programs, good
enough to replace real workers interacting with real customers. The past few sentences have comprised
and apology for the thought process of “labor unions increasing their bargaining power through
monopolization” in such a way that the owners may “shoot themselves in the foot” by pursuing the
whole process of monopolization. I remain unconvinced, despite these ruminations, that the ease of
organizing a strike would truly increase in the case of monopolization compared to spreading word
among the known businesses in the area, from among competing businesses in a free market. Also, it
may be fatal for unions in general to bring such aggression upon themselves from becoming too “out of
control” for any business to deal with, upon their increase in power due to monopolization. Such a
consideration would make plausible “legal action” by monopolized employers forcing potential
employers not to participate in unions lest they be sued or something. The service would also still be
required for daily life, even among the striking employers, so in a sense, they would also “shoot
themselves in the foot”. Also, if they persist in creating a “new business” to compete with the
monopoly, then we’re back at square one with a free market competition between businesses, and we
have theoretically undermined the argument in favor of monopoly of industry, because we would have
to escape the parameters of the argument to address the eventuality of competition. Communists
hereby advocate the status quo!

CAPITALISM UNLEASHED

In the interest of rewarding people possessing exceptional talent, it may be better for the likes
of Paul Manafort to keep the perhaps $1 million that would have officially been kept by the government.
The government use of this money would have gone towards something like the paying of perhaps 10
cops’ salaries in order for them to purchase cheap goods at Wal-Mart, for instance. The keeping of this
money by Paul Manafort types instead of paying it to the government could instead be spent on things
like $18,000 suits made from ostrich hides in order to stimulate the business of rare highly skilled
artisans. It is much too popular to assert that the mundane spending at places like Wal-Mart is morally
superior and preferable to that of luxury, especially when those doing the spending are selected from
among the richest 1% of a population. The mundane spending, which supports the livelihood of people
doing said spending – if those people have exceptional talent and are providers of rare highly skilled
services, this mundane spending is just as if not more important than that of people who occupy
mundane jobs and provide mundane services to mundane populations. The appeal to the common
support of common people is all too overemphasized in our society. More Paul Manafort types would be
nice and desirable, in order to encourage more variety in unique professions in order to stimulate young
minds with more surprising and engaging and interesting documentaries (see “How It’s Made) to
encourage kids to think outside of the box when contemplating future career choices and/or hobbies.

DECONSTRUCTING ADVOCATION OF WORLD GOVERNMENT

Advocates of NWO (New World Order aka one world government aka globalism) commonly
suggest that a single world government would, of necessity and by force, and defensibly and rightfully,
end all large-scale violence, perhaps forever. When they say this, they make some careless assumptions
that are offensive to lovers of liberty. They assume that the dominant, winning regime is and would be
certainly and verifiably among the most righteous and deserving of the role as supreme world leader –
and that any would-be-challenger nation will, for the rest of human history, not be significantly more
deserving of such a role. These mistaken advocates also neglect changes over time of popular attitudes
and virtues regarding the role of government in general, and the corresponding receptiveness of
opposing regimes to what is popular vs unpopular. Like most will concede, the switching of conservative
vs liberal labels in the Republican vs Democrat parties since the Civil War – this same dynamic could
again arise in the future, and it could do so between different nations, and within parties who are in or
are seeking to gain power over a nation, perhaps in unexpected and unpredictable ways. These changing
dynamics may cause a once-popular and once-principled party to go wrong and fall out of favor in terms
of what is important to the 51%, whether they realize it to be important or not. The possibility always
remains that a valid and deserving underdog may remain out of reach of the power and influence it
requires in order to fulfill mass wishes, due to a resistant and stubborn occupying regime which may or
may not have held popular favor in the past. NWO globalism advocates seem to forget that the 49% may
desire different universal policies than the 51% will allow by mob rule, and this is assuming even a
strangely perfectly “democratic” global government. These advocates essentially neglect the prospect or
proposition of ever allowing multi-faceted nationalist experiments to take place that would properly
enable the scientific study of multiple variables in societal preference of particular versions of law,
order, culture, language, ethnicity, etc.

IMPLICATIONS OF WORLD GOVERNMENT

It is obvious and even redundant to mention that the final form of “globalism” is NWO one
world government, and that its purpose is to forever enslave the world under a communist regime, just
like the Chinese government is doing to the Chinese people, except it will become much worse than
that. With a single world government alongside the ever-more-popular belief in “democracy” as a noble
virtue and secular God, the goal is to establish a one-person-one-vote system. Probably the final,
ultimate barrier to achieving this wholesale, is the United States electoral college system whereby the
United States technically remains a “Republic”. After the electoral college has been abandoned, it will be
extremely easy to empower globalists enough to institute a single world government and quickly
persuade the masses to vote in a communist regime using the Chinese method, involving complete state
control over the economy in exchange for the government’s promise to artificially expand the middle
class somehow. With the accompanying end of the free market worldwide, will begin the eternal
enslavement of humans. There will be no good reason to reproduce, and within a generation or two all
humans will be sheep or drug/sex addicts, likely unarmed and defenseless against armies speaking a
foreign language which shall be commanded by the elite for the purposes of ethnic cleansing and forced
population reduction, firstly and primarily against whites. In this manner become clear the purposes of
“fast and furious” and Hillary’s winning of the popular vote (by rigging) especially in light of the
subsequent “Resist” anti-nationalist anti-Trump movement.

The mind creates a primal psychological discomfort when it contemplates the true endgame of
one world-communist-state. Communism is really “formalized oligarchy”, because some regime will
necessarily enforce rules and decisions as regarding the patterns with which whom uses what scarce
resources, equipment, land, or labor of others, and for what purpose, for how long, etc. This regime will
claim to assert its powers in the “best interests of the people”. Most people will volunteer their
advocacy/support of such a regime because they are dumb and jealous of “moderately rich people”
who, in their hysteria of “sex addiction”, they are keenly interested in delegitimizing. “Sex addicts”
assert jealous dominance that is threatened with exposure to individuals of “higher financial status”.
These degenerates are so vile, their “sexual conquest” is more important than eternal freedom of
humans, and they rationalize that, an oligarchy of several to a hundred supremely powerful world rulers,
ruling ruthlessly over all other humans on Earth, who are “equal” before the oligarchy, this would
reduce the chances of “social status” threatening their “sexual domination” by virtue of reducing the
chances that their sexual “partner(s)” will ever come into contact with anyone of “higher social status”
than themselves, for this would require exposure to an “oligarch”! Such passes for a plausible
explanation for the reasoning behind the advocacy of the masses for “formalized oligarchy” legitimized
through communism, under the veil of “streamlined handling of all property which has become
public/communal by virtue of the communist revolution”. Jealousy, stemming from social complications
of “sexual dominance”, or the striving for such, explains the rationale for eternal enslavement of
humans “from the bottom up”. But what about “from the top down”? The urge toward “power of world
oligarchy”, from the “top-down” perspective, involves the desire for the following sort of power: When
a “world communist oligarch” walks through the streets, he wants the following power when he sees a
female he desires, physically: He wants, on pain of torture or nuking the city of the violators who
presume to stand between him and what he wants, to know the “sexual partners” of this female. Then
he wants to permanently separate them. With “oligarchic power over the world”, the possibility of a
hundred to a thousand supreme rulers emerges, and each has the power to relocate, with all others,
upon intra-oligarchic communication and warning, to a safe distance from the city or cities in which
those protecting the female he desires are hiding. He will nuke the female if the protectors persist! Then
find another in another city of multiplying sex addicts!

TRUMP ON FIFTH AVENUE

When the masses wake up and realize what a huge bullet we dodged by not electing Hillary,
everyone will realize that Trump shooting someone in Time Square is nothing compared to eternal
global enslavement of all humans, which is what will be revealed to have been prevented by Trump’s
nationalist policies. His policies are executed in a deal-making fashion which minimizes the leftist knee-
jerk reaction among the masses who are mostly still wary of anything significantly “right of center”. The
masses have not been initiated into the far-right because of the awkwardness imposed especially by its
racial component of understanding white genocide, and also touchy subjects like holocaust denial and
confrontations with antifa.

TRUMP’S SUPPOSED COLD CIVIL WAR

 The “cold civil war” supposedly started by Trump is in fact hot and has been for a long time. The
aggressor side of the war is Big Government liberal Democrats who want more regulations on private
property and the free market. If we stand in defense of our rights by not following absurd “regulations”,
we will be pursued by law enforcement officers, and if we proceed to resist this tyrannical kidnapping,
we will quickly escalate to being shot and killed. We are in a “hot civil war”, and Trump didn’t start it, he
just made us aware of the unbelievable true nature of it. Indeed, we never thought we’d ever see the
day when a full-fledged race war has begun without our knowledge. Because the Democratic Party has,
for all intents and purposes, become the exclusively-black party – that is, all black people are fully
expected to be staunch supporters of the Democratic Party. In effect, to ninety percent validity, I would
say, it can be said that there is a race war being carried out by black people through the exercise of the
machinery of the state ( a monopoly on the use of violence to coerce market and private property
conformity to arbitrary political demand) to take white people’s property (the free market) out of their
hands at gun point. Obviously, each individual black person is not giving full consent to this, but in
general there is a mind-control in effect that renders most black people susceptible to becoming slaves,
forced to wage a war on white people. In practice, this ultimately means that, unless a given black
person regularly advocates the political success of Republicans or Trump supporters, they are perhaps-
inadvertently conspiring in this race war. Obviously, white people who don’t openly support Trump are
traitors, whether they know it or not. The liberals are violently stealing our material livelihood using
threat of police gunfire! The liberals have conscripted nearly all black people, against their will, in a race
war against whites by virtue of no-longer-cold, civil-war-style aggression against whites who are
considered racist for supporting Trump. Supporting Trump is literally advocating for the simple bartering
with thieves over the prospect of keeping a greater portion of that which already belongs to you! We
can’t even negotiate for complete justice, in the form of voting libertarian, for fear that the
“progressive” thieves will win an irreversible victory, in the sense that higher taxes will cripple the
economy and “necessitate” ever-higher taxes, as one example! The anti-white racism is so overt in
politics that Castro can campaign for president on virtually nothing but the fact that he belongs to the
Hispanic race, while the same tactic performed by a white person would get him morally crucified!
There is very little excuse, anyway, for a black person to remain ignorant of the fact that he has been
conscripted by liberals into a race war against white people, through the machinery of state violence in
enforcement of regulations on the free market. The “cold civil war” is thus, clearly, a “hot race war”.
Deep in the trenches of awareness of this disturbing trend, we can find forgiveness for those who
venture to deem Dylan Roof a saint for “increasing the heat” of the race war, to increase awareness of
its ongoing status. The faster black people give up hope for most white people not being racist enough
to spontaneously kill blacks, the quicker the public will accept the utility of quarantining racists by
creating all-white areas or an all-white nation to which to export racists, thereby ending the long, painful
history of closeted, secret racism forever. Of course, the general race war would end, virtually overnight,
with the creation of an all-white nation. But this shall never happen as long as the liberals have anything
to say about it, because their votes come from the thriving of racism – they don’t want to see racism
end, ever! They want to milk the demonization of whites more and more vigorously as the white
population decreases. It shall only get more juicy as “racist tendencies of inherited aversion to race-
mixing” amplify every generation any white people have the gall to survive and reproduce!

PECULIAR INTERACTION

Upon hearing that I’m a Trump supporter, a seemingly normal black man somehow finds it
appropriate to then immediately ask what I think about black people in general. To skip formalities, I
proceed to say that as a white person, I would seriously hesitate to allow my seed to be used for
procreation with a black woman because I know from observation that the child would look unrelated to
the parents (isolated from each other, at least, as in the absence of either the mother or the father) and
I want my child to look like me. The black man looks at e like I said something categorically offensive and
rudely asks, “What’s so great about looking like you?” as if to truly be asking “What, you think you aren’t
ugly? Because you are.” The tone certainly indicates that they think I’m focused on my child’s inclusion
in the white community because they assume I’m deeply racist and/or invested in a program of generic
“white privilege”. I try to allude in my response to the fact that one of the most “holy or divine” aspects
of my existential ontology or epistemology of the broadest philosophical conceptions of life itself, is the
fact and feeling that I objectively and subjectively look very similar to both my mother and my father. I
then continue by admitting that I would seriously hesitate to allow myself to be forced into consciously
denying my child of what is personally one of the most special feelings I have related to being a human.
They respond as though I just spouted off a load of nonsense, declaring how important and valuable it is
to bestow upon a child growing up in our “racist society”, the gift of learning intimately and firsthand the
perspective of having a mixed race identity. He certainly seems to believe that Bruno Mars is some sort
of supreme being. I indignantly respond that one’s relationship to one’s personal vs collective identity is
not related to any virtue I really wish to instill in my child because I am not geared toward racist
conceptions of social institutions. I continue to assert that I am less geared toward collective society and
am more geared toward family, God, and the contemplation of biological earthly existence. I’m not
emphasizing the idea that I would love my hypothetical mixed race child more or less than my
hypothetical white child – I’m just trying to say that having a mixed child would require a conscious
choice on my part to deny a gift I have infinitely enjoyed receiving from both my parents.

DIRTY COMMUNIST MIND TRICKS

Communists invest in and bet heavily on the success of nasty mind tricks to be engaged during
arguments, primarily in person – indeed, we see clearly that, online, the AnCaps and NatSocs and other
far-right ideologues have the clear upper hand and are more at ease in debate with communists on the
internet than are the communists. But nevertheless the communists seem to dominate university
campuses using said tricks that, when used online, tend to fail and simultaneously reveal these nasty
mind tricks through the vantage point of time-delayed, well-thought-out, written responses to the crude
deliveries of these mind tricks. The distilled essence of these tricks may be derived from the communist
proposal and subsequent communist inquisition in defending the “virtues” of a communal fiscal policy of
“from each according to their ability and to each according to their need” which, after proposing, a
communist will defend with endless “why not?” questions meant to confound and stupefy their victim.
This mind trick works through a “gotcha” tactic which emerges from the resultant mental glitches
triggered in the victim, which are to be pointed at by the communist as clear evidence of “impotence in
the face of conflicting irrefutable truths”, but which, in reality, arises from the sheer overload in the
mind of the victim – a mind tasked with processing so many incoming objections to such a universally
absurd and unnatural policy proposal. Diametrically, the confounding confrontations with a sober mind
enter the issues raised into an infinitely regressive vicious loop in the victim’s mental mechanics. The
proposal of institutionalizing the conditions of utopia in an incompatible framework of human nature
creates chaos in the sober mind which is biologically governed by the psychology of the very same
human nature. The resultant inevitable loss of words is translated by the communists engaging in this
mind trick as a clear win on behalf of communism.

COMMUNIST NORMALCY BIAS

The communist tactic of dragging down high performers using sentiments anchored into the
norms of the common sheep extends to free speech through targeting the internet with “hate” filters
when “hate” is literally anything that becomes unpopular. The related tactic characterized by the
message “Haha, greedy capitalists, we used your own capitalist greed against you to defeat you” is
employed by the communist lobbying and influence upon monopolistic, anti-capitalistic, overly-
popularized, government-sponsored, “successful” websites and internet services to achieve disruption
of the means of communication between AnCaps and NatSocs and “the others” of potentially-like-mind
they’ve been divinely tasked with reaching, to bear high-performing, unpopular, intelligent messages of
hope and understanding by virtue of analyses of communist rhetoric. The supposedly “capitalist-
generated” monopolies of high-viewership are one-by-one removed from the utility of the far-right
when the wildfire of truth spreads through them, alerting the communists to unwanted liberation of
minds within the masses. The method used by communists to lobby monopolistic media involves crude
appeals to “community standards” regarding intolerance towards hate or scary conspiracies by virtue of
the assertion that no such scary conspiracy exists – which is ironically itself a scary conspiracy. A forced
normalcy bias becomes obvious in this assertion that common minds are not mature enough to tolerate
the free contemplation of the potential validity of new perspectives of a paradigm-shifting gravity.

INHERENT GLOBALISM IN COMMUNISM

Communists make strangely weak arguments about the need to seek out and destroy what they
label “capitalism” wherever it exists worldwide, and they mainly focus on the idea that capitalism will
inevitably seek out and destroy communism wherever it exists, in a manner of perfect psychological
projection. If ever is offered to them the option of physical separation of their commune from
capitalistic society, they will turn down the offer, not that this would yet be possible because “real
capitalism” has not occurred since the feudal age, but in any case, their claims that “real communism”
has not existed either, are academically permissible assuming said offer grants them their own
opportunity to perfect communism on their own. The big problem is they won’t allow themselves to
describe ANY communism EVER as either “real” or “perfected” supposedly until after all capitalism, or
money-based economies in general, are ended permanently, worldwide. So basically they are not
content with simple fascistic segregation based on economic ideology. They insist on a capture-and-
torture program of “super-fascism” against anyone who opposes the abolition of all forms of money and
private property ownership principles. One can only assume that this paranoia indicates that future
generations of communist societies will be tempted through observation by capitalist surplus and
relative luxuries or else their leaders will be, such that bribery transforms communes into slave labor
camps or something along those lines. It would seem that their communist minds are so fragile that the
communal economy is threatened by the simple foreign presence of excess goods because the very
concept would corrupt the minds of the proletariat. Their lack of confidence in their own ideology
indicates a lack of creativity.

While states still exist, “international capitalism” (globalism), especially trading with regimes and
businesses of those states which coerce “policies” upon their citizens to increase “central planning” of
the “market” through “selective investment” of stolen tax funds, is fundamentally inseparable from, and
colludes with, “full communism”. Communist regimes are given support by “international capitalists”
who validate them by doing business with them to outcompete domestic markets with cheaper, foreign,
communist-force-supported-goods-productions. The capital gains of such globalist intrigue may be
reinvested in a vicious cycle with bribes of the foreign communist regime which perpetuate the vicious
cycle by further, continuous readjustment of allocations of stolen tax funds to selectively promote
productions of key goods by subservient foreign businesses in the communist country, to always supply
cheap goods to a domestic market at the expense of the masses, who pay taxes to the foreign
communist regime to allow them to persist along these obscene lines of monopoly-creating
“economics”. Those who aim, by these means, to establish monopolies, are abusing the idea of
“capitalism” in one state to gain control over the communist regime that uses force to deliver cheap
products which enable said monopolies to be established. Real “socialism” should “protect society”, and
real “nationalism” should oppose these globalist “capitalist” schemes in a similar or identical manner of
“protecting society”, such that socialism should be identical to Nationalism, and Nationalism should be
identical to Socialism. Thus we have “National Socialism” as a perfect label for a movement that is
desperate to end the above-described capitalist-communist scheme. While states exist, obviously
Anarcho-Capitalism may remain an ideal, but the necessity of ending the globalist “free trade” which
supports worldwide communism, must take precedence. Because the definitions and labels are not
suitable, and because most AnCaps continue to idealistically support “free trade”, I insist that the best
way for supposed “Anarchists” to “get real” is to utilize the label “National Socialist” as a method of
strongly resisting communism and the globalist “capitalist” system that supports it. If “Anarchists” could
look past the lies told about “racism” and genocide, particularly by recognizing that the Holocaust was a
hoax, it would be easy to see that Hitler’s National Socialism was the premiere effort to save the real
right-wing vision of world redemption.

DISDAIN FOR GLOBALIST RINO’S

Anti-Trump stalwart George W. Bush said “Trump, you cannot just wish away globalism!” The
reality of his assertion relates to the desires of the ultra-elite plutocrats to maintain their artificially high
income at the expense of society. This concerns the facet of society involving the reality of crony-
capitalist corporatocracy masquerading as legitimate government “by the people”. These ultra-elites are
involved in communist affairs involving downright dystopian and genocidal agendas. The ultra-elite have
a tendency to derive their profits from unusually-awkward-niche negotiations that most of society
cannot withstand for good reasons like avoidance of social unpleasantries. These “bad apples of
capitalism” do things that are improperly labeled by leftists as actually “capitalist” in nature when in
reality they should be labeled “big government globalist culture-corrupting” activities by good people
with benevolent long-term wishes for the masses. They straddle natural cultural, linguistic, and national
borders and play both sides of said borders, especially in events of warfare, using government
sponsorship, protection, and manipulation to compromise natural healthy capitalist competition in free
markets to their advantage to secure their own future, further domination, thereby using “laws of
governments” as a cover to essentially use force of violence at the hand of police state gunfire to
threaten any competitors challenging their imposed monopolies. No one even wants to become a
competitor in the type of game they’re playing because to do so would be an investment in degenerate
influences on social institutions by themselves, their employees, their customers, and the cultural
landscape in general. Splitting up jobs between multiple cultures is inherently degenerate and strictly
anti-nationalist in principle.

ANCAP VS TARIFFS
 Tariffs are not understood by the typical AnCap. They are thinking with their hearts and with
minimal sophistication when they oppose tariffs for want of “free trade”. This heart-thinking is idealistic
because, for validity, it depends on the ideal situation of a world with no states. States render exclusivity
and artificial barriers to the position of being a business owner. Who is and is not a business owner is a
central consideration when asking “whom is protected by tariffs”. I urge the typical AnCap to look
realistically at the state-ridden scenario, in which businesses owe their success largely due to monopoly
protection measures owing to state coercion in market manipulation, and to appreciate how the
privilege of price-setting is granted to business owners in a way divorced from the ideal free market.
Such control will not be released from the hands of business owners before the state is abolished, and it
will generate power to determine the nature of the market, especially in terms of competition with
other business owners. It is important to maintain that the plight of the underdog is ultimately all about
upward mobility of non-rich people to the status of “successful business owner”. I hope it doesn’t sound
too oppressive of me to insist that, for reasons of socio-cultural cohesion, it would be better for business
owners to share social features with the masses, especially in an attempt to minimize the possible harm
of enabling “freedom to discriminate” against people who support “movements” you don’t approve of,
and therefore not to sell to them. To put it crudely, “we don’t want foreign business owners”. The word
“foreign” is flexible enough to mean “communist”! Importantly, we should extend this line of thinking to
include as “foreign” those business owners who support “even more foreign” business owners by buying
their resources in order to perform as they do in the “domestic” market. The utility of tariffs is a
sophisticated level of “boycott” in an effort to make what should be a meaningful delineation between
“foreign and domestic”. Lovers of tariffs are genuinely engaged in protection of “society” by performing,
on its behalf, campaigns of boycott that “it” has not the sophistication to carry out on “its” own. We are
granting meaning to the label “national state” when we slap heavy tariffs on goods sourced from
“other” nation-states. It doesn’t particularly matter who gets the money from the tax, but a convenient
recipient while the state still exists is the state itself, in the hopes that such will reduce the tax burden
on citizens. Whether we like it or not, life in economies involves competition for control of goods. We
would behoove ourselves not to allow possible communists to gain control over our resources by using
“foreign” intrigue to outcompete us as business owners. Tariffs protect society from foreign takeover,
and only the most naïve believer in statelessness would assert that “we are all one” just because states
“shouldn’t” exist. We can’t just treat the world the way it “should” be, or else we will be taken
advantage of by realists who treat it the way it actually is. We will be genocided, make no mistake about
it, if we submit to labeling ourselves humanists, individualists, globalists, or universalists, and forget that
we have national identity. Other people with intact national identities will genocide us economically.
Tariffs are protection for culture and society within nation-states competing among other nation-states.
We don’t want to give our masses the opportunity to subsidize “foreign cultures” without at least
monetary punishment. It’s not “cool” to smoke Cuban cigars. We don’t want to let China sabotage us
with state-coerced, tax-funded steel overproduction to compete our steel factories out of existence and
thereby fail to produce war equipment without China which has thereby preemptively beaten us in war.

ANARCHO-CAPITALIST WELFARE SOLUTIONS

The communist assertion that abolition of money and private ownership is the only solution to
the predicament of the poor not finding jobs due to self-sustaining property owners dominating their
geographic proximities is childish. This assertion begs permission to call our current system “capitalist”
and to overemphasize the severity of the current obstacles faced by the poor. They refuse to concede a
trickle down effect that extends to the conditions following the abolition of government, which AnCaps
insist will fill the free market with charity programs that appear to be on steroids compared to anything
the government has ever been or ever will be able to provide. The communists paint hideous images of
their loathed AnCap enemies, suggesting a common theme among rich people and the middle class of
actually wanting the poor to suffer or of being disappointed to see programs whereby the poor are
demonstrably lifted out of miserable conditions. They would hate to exercise their imaginations about
forms of business advertisement widely characterized by charitable and renovative achievements,
making it easily possible in a near-utopia for the primary selection criteria for customers to do business
to rely on demonstrations by businesses proving their success in helping the poor and disabled to win
comfortable living conditions. Communists fail to recognize that it is truly government which stifles the
full potential of charity by restricting and binding it through legal institutions instead of unleashing it
into a free market. Feudal societies only lacked the technology to broadcast via internet and travel via
car to locations of economic hardships. People would volunteer more without government guarantees
of “handling the problem”.

IDEOLOGICAL BARRIERS TO ANCAP

A major barrier to ideological acceptance of “pure liberty” aka Anarcho-Capitalism, is the

widespread mistrust of “rich people” in general, which sets up ideological barriers when the implications
of “pure liberty” are imagined to necessarily include a kind of “negative Social Darwinism, which sets the
unenlightened imagination on track towards a kind of “capitalist dystopia”, deriving from images of a
society dominated by ruthless “haves” at the total expense of “have-nots”. “Positivists” (aka people
who, as apologists of modern statism, seek to assert the idea that government is an “imperfect” but
overall “positive” influence on society) may readily concede “imperfections” in government control to
the tune of 70% wastefulness due to bureaucracy, but the theme of “30% is better than nothing for
welfare-dependents” is seen as overriding in importance, and the “guarantee” wrought by coercion at
gun-point, by government agents enforcing laws to play the Robin-Hood-role, is seen as an institution
far too sacred or concretized to risk sacrificing and replacing with “pure liberty”, which is crudely
interpreted by “positivists” as merely “some half-baked theory in which rich people somehow begin
acting with benevolence when let unleashed upon a stateless geography to fulfill ridiculous prophecies
about a presumably-desirable free market”. These “positivists” see government as, at worst, a
“necessary evil” which prevents the greater evil of “giving free reign” to “rich people”, who would, if not
for the providence of the state, reveal themselves as what they are imagined to actually be, in a state of
“anarchist chaos” or wild nature, namely, some form of “predatory advocates of genociding the poor.”
The government is seen by these “positivists” as an insurance policy against the chaotic power of
“excessive money”, and they usually do not look in obvious disdain at the idea of “maximum wage
laws.” Libertarian Anarcho-Capitalism is seen by these “positivists” as a form of chaos in which,
ultimately, only the financially-sound may survive. These types of people must not be allowed to hear,
prematurely, the equation between anarchy and liberty, until they have read a solid Libertarian
Manifesto inspired by Austrian economics, like Rothbard, Ludwig von Mises, Hoppe, Ron Paul, etc., and
getting them to read such material may be a daunting task indeed. “Positivists” have a sickened vision of
the upper class somehow uniting as controllers of business economies to unilaterally exploit or even
enslave the masses, in a presumably worse manner than is currently enabled by Federal Reserve
inflation, coupled with taxation, in the modern state. “Positivists” lack a certain sophistication, required
to amply apply free-market principles of (upper class) competition to all realms of human action,
including, primarily, a vivid picture of “rich people” competing for lower/middle-class human resources
and “poor people” voluntarily quitting and applying for “different jobs”, because the darkness of
modern, state-derived hardships distorts their notions of able-bodiedness and ultimate mobility among
the poor. They lack the imaginative momentum of the gifts of Facebook, Libraries, Starbucks,
smartphones, and “liberated middle-class peddlers”, in a newly-stateless society, looking for human
resources in a triumphantly ascendant, anarchistic entrepreneurial venture, and, from among such
“peddlers”, the willingness to lift up the wretched streetfolk out of their immobility in Christlike manner,
yet, ultimately, also in “selfish” economical manner. The darkness of modern statism obscures the
“positivists’” mental vision with impressions of ultra-elite aloofness and disengagement from the masses
and the over-worked middle-class, much too preoccupied with making ends meet amidst an inflation-
distorted job market and increasing tax burdens. I could continue along these lines, explaining the
“positivist” rejections of the idea of radical liberation from state-imposed norms, but you should have
the bleak picture by now. As a radically pro-active solution to the depressing act of yielding to such
“positivist” rhetoric as a fact of life, I propose the reformulation, refurbishment, and rejuvenation of the
principle of “fascism” as a cure. In this, I seek to take advantage of the fact that the “positivists” and
Leftists, generally, are eager to concede the idea that, to some extent, humans must be “forced” to
behave honorably. Let us incorporate into our Libertarian Anarcho-Capitalist ideology an initial,
kickstarting wave of “fascism” as assurance of “honorable behavior” by way of selectivity and
exclusionary principles of “covenant” community members with the spirit of such things as “application
essays”, as in college admission, for acceptance as “citizen” in secession-achieved, stateless geography.
“Fascist policy” may include validation and limitation of use of personal funds, likely transformed into
crypto-currency, and constant surveillance measures involving forced publicizing of
Facebook/smartphone activity (or inactivity) as a method of ensuring honesty and honorable character.
Such seemingly anti-anarchist, authoritarian “fascist” policies may be vital to successful secession, which
depends heavily on ideological conversion of Leftists and statist “positivists”.

BUT WHO WILL BUILD THE ROADS?

Criticizers of AnCap focus on this question to assert their answer of central planning and what
essentially amounts to a “democratic” state of some sort. I find it easy to imagine rich people getting
together to pay pavement companies to build roads for use by everyone, who lives or travels, near them
or their stores or businesses. It is arguably in the best interests of rich people to make productive and
active community members even more so. Imagine business owners wishing to optimize and maximize
clients and customers by increasing access, by as many people as possible, to their stores’ locations –
this would, as well, apply to multiple stores belonging to other rich people who have banded together to
get a “bulk package deal” from pavement companies to fund a whole community network of roads.
Basically voluntaryism itself may govern transactions resulting in road-building instead of an
institutionalized, collective, democratic state. Community members and travelers, with jobs or savings of
their own, may have money they’re willing to spend – that is, unless communism and bans on currency
reign down oppression on the society. Anarchy ensures more rich peoples’ money remains free to spend
on such society-bolstering projects – in the absence of state-government extortion which, so often in
history, comes in the form of forcefully-imposed taxations.

KNEELING NFL PROTESTERS

At the risk of sounding too obvious, nevertheless it may be useful to describe the globalist-
communist-Zionist character of the “NFL Kneeling National Anthem protesters” who would obviously
rather be citizens of a global NWO government than of the United States. The overall goal seems to be
to change the minds of the NFL team owners who enforce a policy of standing for the USA flag, whether
of their own volition or due to public opinion and viewership on television broadcasts. Thus the
mechanism involves changing peoples’ minds, at large, enough for them to not object to a policy of
“allowing kneeling”, so better to spread the message of their ideology. This ideology is a preliminary
prototype of neo-communism, requiring no “hammer and sickle”, by virtue of overtly anti-Nationalist
sentiment seeking to enable open claim to membership within a social order that promotes “anti-racist”
racism inherent in the overall agendas of communism. The trick involved in this endeavor uses racism as
a scapegoat to bolster defenses of “pro-POC racism”. Basically, one will eventually hereby be able to use
skin color as a bargaining or bartering tool in negotiating any ordinary police brutality to be rendered as
being of the label “hate crime” simply because the person(s) with whom the police are interacting is/are
of a dark complexion – conceivably or ideally applying to the likes of a rioting gang. This trick has the
added benefit of casting “the entire system” in a light of “favoring whites”, thus adding to the growing
number of reasons compelling the masses to take unilaterally racist actions against anyone ostensibly
described as “behaviorally white” and/or of a light/fair complexion. This aids the communist endgame of
white genocide which puts the capstone upon the globalist agenda.

COMMUNIST CONSPIRACY IN GANGS, DRUGS, OUTSOURCING AND LABOR UNIONS

A good definition of a “communist conspiracy” is anything that is constructed to introduce an

unfair competitive advantage which compromises the otherwise-capitalist free market. GANGS stifle
competition in drug supply with violence by smuggling from countries with favorable law enforcement
and assuming the risk of going to jail, artificially driving up costs. Companies who OUTSOURCE labor
stifle competition in labor supply by occupying foreign lands with favorable taxation, economies, and
laws, artificially increasing profit. LABOR UNIONS are like gangs because they stifle entry to the market
by favoring companies big enough to absorb the additional cost demanded by them, artificially favoring
bigger businesses. LABOR UNIONS, GANGS, AND OUTSOURCING serve as conspiracies to instigate
communism by corrupting the free market in order to cast a false capitalism in a negative light, thereby
lending urgency to the goal of a communist revolution. LABOR UNIONS should be regarded as similar to
GANGS as membership indicates conspiracy to commit a crime: drug supply in gangs and work stoppage
in labor unions.

LEFTIST GOALS

The ultimate goal of leftist politicians and their billionaire masters is to prey upon the distrust
felt by the masses of sheep toward millionaires in general. Leftism is ultimately a coup being played out
by the “ultra rich” to steal power from the “moderately rich”. The main tool used to do this is called
“democracy”, which encourages people to allow morally uninhibited demagogue manipulators to
generate votes using flowery speeches. These votes contribute legal legitimacy to the practice of
stealing money from the “moderately rich” to gain control of the economy. Money, which would
otherwise be voluntarily invested in businesses according to the organic desires of the “moderately
rich”, is being redirected to the control by “democratically elected leaders.” These are puppets put in
power by the “ultra rich” billionaires to do their bidding. The purpose is to steal power over the
economy from the “moderately rich” and deliver it into the hands of the “ultra rich”. This is
accomplished through government sponsorship and subsidizing of the “ultra rich” and the industries and
businesses which they control. The government puppets increase industry regulations which favor the
competitive success of businesses backed by “ultra rich” people who have excess money to afford
compliance with regulations which the “moderately rich” are unable to afford.

All democratic processes of deciding upon collective policies are a trick to reduce us to slavery,
and the Democrats and Leftists don’t just know this, they actively enjoy it! The logic of “one-vote-per-
person” arriving at “society’s choice” is deceptive because it smuggles an inconsistent, illogical value
through the idea that collective will in economics is simply the “sum of the parts” of individual
preferences, when, in reality, the complexities of “the few” controlling various timespans of money-
investment render “society” much more complex, through voluntary exchanges, than mere “sums of
parts”. Redistribution towards “armginal means” majorities imposed and coerced upon “extra-marginal
means” minorities renders democratic processes nothing more than mob rule by majority preference in
a vain attempt to establish egalitarian equilibrium of means. This vain attempt has the inevitable effect
of increasing the economic character of society towards oligarchic communistic rule over slaves. As the
productive people are milked too much by less-productive people through majoritarian coercion of state
democracy, they outsource and “go globalist” or reduce productive economies in favor of political gain
to control tax revenues. The moderately rich are stolen from to allow a vacuum to be filled by dystopian
ultra rich plutocrats who promote big corporations which increase the slavish character of life, which, in
a vicious cycle, invites more dissatisfaction to be “assuaged” through ever more radical, progressive,
Leftist democratic vote processes to coerce further corporatist-statist intervention in the economy to
stifle small business competition. This will progress until “capitalism” is easy to blame and the masses
therefore accept the communist control of the economy and politics by oligarchs ruling through a veil of
voting issues, controlling the topics on which people vote, as well as the mass media opinions in favor of
agenda options in these issues to engineer favorable voting by masses – and this shall be called
“democratic socialism”. Through democratic voting, “society’s choice” is coerced on all individuals like
the Joker’s smile which was cut into his cheeks, and the Democrats are such deplorable people, they
really “want to see the world burn” in this communist dystopian decline into totalitarian rule by elites
who control our lives like slaves. This is presumably because Democrats see the state as a tool for
collective suicide, and their own happiness is subordinate to their hatred for those they enviously
despise such that their highest spiritual fulfillment is eternal damnation of Planet Earth!

HOUSING BUBBLE

There’s a nasty connection between the people who started the housing bubble, the people
financing the housing bubble, and the people building the houses. Said connection is all about the
investment in the supposedly or ostensibly inevitable rise of communism in America. The devalued
currency is put into increased circulation and the Zionist real-estate controllers start the snowball of
excessive investment in house-building, alongside their own collusion with their globalist peers, who
already control government policy and gang activity, and counter-activity, in Mexico using
simultaneously-controlled drug laws in the United States. This predictably results in the tendency of
cheap laborers, who only speak Spanish, to willingly participate in this seemingly nonsensical system, by
actually doing the physical construction. The general point of all this is to build too many houses, to
make it easier for liberals to look at the “problem” of homelessness and simultaneously “too many
empty houses”, so better to blame “capitalism and the free market”, and more easily become full-blown
communists. Obviously, “real capitalism” didn’t create the Federal Reserve, so they’re wrong, but
nevertheless, the illusion remains… they believe they’re correct. Mexicans are generally already
communist and Mexico’s government is already far-left, so it’s natural for the globalizing objective of
spreading communism to the United States to be undertaken as a cause by illegal immigrants, who
condone the absurd allocation of their own manual labor, on the intensely ulterior basis that they will
eventually inhabit these excess homes they’re building. They certainly reproduce enough to stake the
claim of quickest utilization of these otherwise “excess” houses, so they naturally agree to participate in
this large-scale racial theft of “white” peoples’ property. The Zionists LOVE this because the thieves
genetically look sufficiently dissimilar to them, while simultaneously they themselves look sufficiently
similar to whites, in order to neatly achieve the goal of “replacing” whites and gaining hegemony over
their pawns in this genocidal machination. Global communism is, among other things, a generic
reference to “stealing white peoples’ stuff”.

THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG?

This question is a good metaphor for a similar question: does labor produce capital or does
capital produce labor? Which is necessary first? Well, inasmuch as God is not a human and does not
provide “human labor”, Earth itself is the primary capital. Of course planting is laborious, but food
comes from Earth more directly than from planting because animals are not humans and animals were
the original spreaders of seeds. The epitome of political violence would be to drop communists from
helicopters in the middle of the ocean because they fight against capital and the ground capital is what
enables their labor. Indeed, no labor would be possible without a hard surface to stand on. In the
ideation of “body as capital” we may think of steroids as a form of capital that enables more laborious
endurance. Mind is capitalist and it dictates motivation and choices which guide the application of labor.

SERIAL KILLER LEFTIST

Sharing a system of government with leftists is like having a serial killer roommate who tries to
shoot you in the back of the head after every time you discover their hidden handgun and unload the
bullets. They keep pulling the trigger when they think it’s loaded and you keep forgiving them for doing
so because you’re too nice to kick them out on the street. Capitalists are too nice to throw communists
from helicopters into the middle of the ocean as airlifted shark food.

KRISHNAMURTI NATIONALISM

Krishnamurti’s definition of violence, and its implications, suggest that violence involves
separation of individuals from each other, particularly that which arises as a result of inclusion or
separation or segregation in or from one or more labels involving primarily religion, in Krishnamurti’s
specific evaluation, but I will add labels describing such various persuasions as politics, race, language,
etc. I insist that the most important types of labels to analyze in their relation to “separatory violence”
are those of race and language, by virtue of their more serious and concrete natures, given that race is
genetic and cannot be changed at will, and that language takes much time and effort to change at will.
Opinions and beliefs are practically figments of the imagination compared to race, so I believe any
stubbornness associated with social inclusion based on “culture, politics, and religion” should be
regarded as vastly lagging behind that of race and language in importance. In the interest of reducing
“separatory violence” I insist that collisions between individuals of different race and language are
extremely important to avoid, while that of different “culture, politics, and religion” is relatively
unimportant. On this basis, I assert that the propensity of “segregation” to AVOID collisions between
disparate groups should and could be engaged through voluntary geographical separation between
racial and linguistic groups, who heavily identify with their own chosen or genetically-determined race
or language to such an extent that subconscious or open fascism may occur without the auspices of such
“segregation”. The potential for such “fascist collisions” to occur will be systematically eliminated if we
employ Nationalist boundaries such that each race or language has the option to emigrate to its own
“father land”. On behalf of whites, I venture to guess that the advantage of ending all racism forever
would tend to encourage the “democratic voting” upon an “official white language” – most likely English
– such that “white nationalists” could be theoretically satisfied with “all whites” moving to a single
“Kekistan” at their own voluntary will in an effort to systematically eliminate their own subconscious
racism by virtue of the fact that “one cannot be racist if everyone one interacts with belongs to one’s
own race”. The conceivable temporary, collective violence necessary to forcefully relocate people to
where they belong, in this racism-eliminating scheme, may well be PERMISSIBLE as “means” justified by
the “ends” of ending collisions of violent, individual, fascist nature, FOREVER.

MINOR CRITIQUE OF TRUMP RHETORIC

I feel it necessary to critique Trump on a rather important quote which has profound
implications. He said, “America doesn’t worship government, America worships God.” While that may
be true enough of current America and the “popular definitions” of government and God, I don’t believe
it necessarily SHOULD be true of America, given more useful or sophisticated ideas of “government and
God” as I believe they SHOULD be defined, in a perfect world. Ideal government is meant to properly
connect the individual to the collective in terms of “law and order”, and a truly benevolent government,
which I believe may well have never existed yet on Earth, would certainly be worthy of worship. Indeed,
the best idea I have of the one true God is intimately related to the connection between the individual
and the Universe, which is a physical form of “the collective” with biological and mathematical forms of
“law and order”. So I would like to inform Trump that, although he may be correct, his validity is not
necessarily a “good thing” but rather a commentary on the imperfect reality of “government” and an
immature idea of “God”. In a perfect world (perhaps without Zionism) government would be “worthy”
of the definition of “God”, in such a way that to worship the most advanced idea of God would involve
worshipping “government” as a means of manifesting the aspect of God bestowing proper alignment
between the individual and his inhabited surroundings and environment. The only issue left to debate,
then, is whether the “ideal method” of aligning the individual to its inhabited surroundings should really
be called “government” as, according to most AnCaps, the “proper definition of government” along
these individual collective environment alignment kinds of lines, would REQUIRE THE ABSENCE OF A
STATE. This invites a healthy discussion about the virtues and definitions involved in the following
words: state, government, anarchy, policy, police, law, taxes, violence, community, society, natural
order, collective, rulers, justice, voting, democracy, consensus, ostracism, inclusion, liberty, oppression,
corruption, shadow government, puppets, etc. Essentially a “natural social order” is simply the highest,
most advanced form of the “external God” including “nature” in which an individual finds himself. If God
may be called “the mind to nature connection”, then society itself is a “branch of God” and therefore
“the alignment of individuals to society” is a “branch of said branch of God”. Just as every branch of
every branch of a tree is part of said tree – in the same way, social order is “part of God” – therefore
“deserving worship” the same way one might worship the hand or foot of God, anthropomorphically. I
submit that, had Zionism been absent in human history, the institutions that would qualify as
“government”, in their alignment of individual to grand social order, would be Godlike in their purity and
uncorrupted by evil and wholesome in their connection to the universal God, therefore deserving
worship as much as the “total God” himself!

RECREATIONAL NUKES

Some form of “privately owned nukes” shall here be discussed. In the spirit of the second
amendment of the United States Constitution, the Founding Fathers did NOT say: “You have the right to
bear arms unless those arms get super big and scary.” Leftists claim the second amendment exclusively
referred to contemporary “musket” technology or involved only the “hunting of deer” and such, yet
CANNONS were included in the second amendment, and the purpose was to fight back against
“perhaps-Zionist-occupied-government” so they were obviously permitting private ownership of
anything able to be owned by any government in the interest of preventing eternal enslavement and/or
physical genocide, particularly that of whites. It’s obvious that material possessions are of great concern
to Zionists for their purpose of inhabiting those buildings and more easily living off the labor of now-
dead slaves who while-alive did not even know they were enslaved. The anti-nuclear ulterior motive
disguised by “saving lives”, to any sensible intellectual, can be deduced by the utter nonsense of
asserting that, in knowledge of the afterlife and eternal consciousness, which Jews “claim to possess”,
one person dying instantaneously is significantly different in the grand scheme of things, from say five
thousand people dying instantaneously. Indeed to a Gnostic these scenarios are NOT significantly
different. To anyone with real knowledge of the nature of the parallel dimension which souls enter into
upon death, there isn’t any “moral” difference between the painless death of one vs many. What is
really suspicious is how the allegedly spiritually advanced Rabbis of Zionism seem to have great concern
for the proliferation of nukes. It’s obvious to radical intellectuals that these Rabbis are highly invested in
preventing the destruction of “urban areas” because, when they plan to “replace whites” they don’t
want to be burdened with the labor of reconstruction or construction. “They” correctly predict that
“whites” would rather commit mass suicide and destroy “all their cities” than be retroactively enslaved,
contemporaneously enslaved, or to allow Zionists in any sense to live off what they’ve built – basically
these Rabbis know we might just NUKE OURSELVES in the final stages of an agenda they may well have
planned. They are therefore highly invested in keeping sacred mushrooms and DMT illegal because
these spiritual technologies convince people of the reality of “spirit and the afterlife” and would
therefore possess the propensity to increase the so-undesired likelihood of whites choosing suicide and
whole-city-destruction over slavery and “replacement” or simple mass-theft of buildings.

Nuclear proliferation is a strategy to minimize deaths that result from a temptation to use
invasive force of a nuclear-monopoly-cartel-member-state against a state without nuclear weapons.
Giving nukes to all states would deter every possible invasion and literally end all war, so the elites
promote propaganda about the irrationality/insanity of foreign states as a tactic to protect the nuclear-
monopoly-cartel from competition. Such competition would destroy profits of military equipment
productions – no more guns would be broken and replaced because they would never be used! Gun use
relies on the giving in to the temptation of invading countries, and nuclear possession would induce a
threat of retaliation which is too great to tolerate. This argument must be applied to the idea of a New
World Order (NWO) global government which, if successful, could demand all states on Earth to join the
nuclear-monopoly-cartel. This would be preferable to the current situation in a sense, because at least
all state vs. state invasive aggression and loss of lives at gunpoint and in combat would end. But the next
step, according to my philosophy, is two-fold. We must convert all people to National Socialists,
particularly, in this case, for the purpose of limiting citizenship to truly honorable people first of all, and
secondly we must allow private ownership of nukes by all citizens. In short, citizenship must mean
something, especially if it implies the right to own all types of arms, including nukes. The utility of the
National Socialist aspect is the assumption of racially-oriented states, which, in this case, grants
protection from domestic racial aggression and allows each race to control its eternal and Earthly fate
through specific and differential policies on market control of nuclear technology. This market control
may involve the domination of the market by businesses that ensure proper tracking of nukes, for
example, perhaps to identify whose nuke was detonated where and for what, if any, stated purpose(s).
Private, recreational nuke ownership by “honorable citizens” in racially defined states is in the best
interest of avoiding white genocide. The tyranny of the state, especially if a NOW regime comes into
power, will be systematically eliminated and racially neutralized by my philosophy of National Socialist
Libertarian private recreational nuke ownership by “honorable citizens”. The “honor” aspect minimizes
crazy suicidal lone wolf practices of mass arbitrary murder.

COLLECTIVIST LIBERTARIANISM

Ron Paul claims to emphasize – always – individual liberty in the spirit of “give me liberty or give
me death” but I emphasize it in a greater sense by going a logical step further, and agree with the
assertion made by Hitler that there exists a certain set of arguments and promises associated with well-
tailored collectivization that are so “good” that they can justifiably convince “members” or “citizens” of
the collective to willingly sacrifice some of their rights to “individual liberty” (such as, perhaps, the right
to “own” recreational nukes or the right to “be a follower of Judaism/Zionism”) in the aim of “making
their country or order greater”. The trick is to get the “citizens” to truly recognize and actually believe
that you are indeed “telling the truth” and are certainly NOT SWINDLING them with the ulterior motive
of enslavement and/or genocide. Such convincing, in my opinion, may actually “require” the “grooming
of a NatSoc Dalai Lama baby” who is raised on 24/7 public livestream by “government agents” who
verifiably teach said baby the correct principles of being an omnipotent dictator/monarch to prove to all
“citizens or members” of the collective that their Fuehrer is as perfect as any human can be in their
effort to minimalize corruption in their technically-socialist “engineering” of a free market that is “more
free” than the “free market”. This Dalai Lama may take requests on which topics to teach the next Dalai
Lama and may even bring a group of competing babies to a vote to ask “citizens” for a consensus on
which baby’s academic performance they think indicates the best chance of truly “omnipotent and
benevolent rule” in their developing baby or teenager. A society operating by the private laws which
protect this strange institution of rule over the free market by an “omnipotent NatSoc Dalai Lama baby
Fuehrer” must protect the right of individuals to renounce their “citizenship or membership” if they
don’t agree to the terms of giving up, perhaps, gun rights and religious rights within the borders of said
“covenant community”, which are protected by an official militia, and leaving said borders if they “want
individual liberties back”.

LIBERTARIAN NATIONAL SOCIALISM

My Far-Right philosophy may be called “Libertarian National Socialism”. The main emphasis is to
point out that the best libertarianism is National Socialist in nature, and the best National Socialism uses
pure libertarian principles. Most people have the crude conception that National Socialism “is just
racism” and even if it were, it should be no surprise to a real libertarian that, as long as private property
is respected, racial discrimination is not a real crime, or shouldn’t be in a libertarian social order. The
world doesn’t work like communists want it to, where they want to be able to spontaneously beat up or
even kill people they claim are “racists”. As though anyone could agree to a definition of “racist”, in the
sense that everyone could be labeled “racist” if their eyes are able to distinguish between different
shades of color, because “racism” is generally determined by factoring race in any distinction, and
owning a pair of eyes that function in a “racist way” and not immediately gouging them out makes you
tolerant of something “racist” and therefore you are “racist”. A real libertarian accepts that “racists”
may have the freedom to get together and “be themselves aka racist”, and indeed, that anyone has the
right to refuse business or interaction with anyone, for any reason.

That’s easy enough, but what takes work is dispelling the notion that “real” National Socialists
don’t like libertarianism. Most work along these lines involves referring to historical records of
Germany’s 1930’s National Socialism. But historical instances of National Socialist policies aren’t
necessary for future revivals labeled “National Socialist”. We can pick and choose what to keep and
what to reject. For example, I don’t believe for one minute that millions of Jews were killed by National
Socialists in the 1930’s and 1940’s, but even if they were, I would simply refuse to kill Jews in a future
revival of “National Socialism”. National Socialist literature never mentions the idea of killing anyone
because of their race, so we can just ignore what supposedly happened in history and absorb the
wisdom of National Socialist literature itself. Anything that doesn’t sound libertarian enough can and
probably should be rejected. Of course, people have the right, under libertarianism, to reject specific
principles of libertarianism as they see fit. You have the right to “remove rights” on your own property,
especially if others are given proper forewarning as evidenced by documentation of said showing of
forewarning.

It is nothing but crude authoritarianism disguised as libertarianism to say one is not allowed to
get together with one’s friends and “be spontaneously authoritarian” on one’s own property. It’s lack of
imagination to say geographic areas can’t have spectra of shades of more or less “anarchy” intermixed
between areas with shades of more or less “authoritarianism”. The reason I respect National Socialism is
because it proposes that some class of people arbitrarily calling themselves “Zionist Jews” are
hypothetically abusing principles of libertarianism. I think National Socialism is infinitely wise for
guarding against the situation of libertarians who shoot themselves in the foot by being too puritanical
in their insistence on libertarian guiding principles. To frame the “Zionist Jew” hypothesis of “hacking”
libertarianism, let us think of an abstraction of “ultra rich elites” who destroy the health of an otherwise
free market by bribing natives of various lands with gold, to allow them to live and thrive and open up
shop among them. Proceed to imagine that these people buy out lawmakers to grant them cost-plus
contracts for business. Then imagine this network uses labor laws in one government to produce goods
cheaply among these people to bring “those” goods to “those” people, who don’t have such conducive
laws. Suddenly the natives in each land can’t compete with labor or price of goods offered and
commanded by the “parasite class”. It’s just easier to describe this whole situation as “Zionist Jewish
activity” because the Zionist Jews are an international cartel compromising governments to make
international profits. It is perhaps “less racist” to synonymously call them “globalists”. But it feels more
accurate to say, “Zionist Jews”. This is the beautiful insight of National Socialism.

National Socialist literature clearly values and respects principles of property rights inherent to
libertarianism. But they insist on a “higher value” that must characterize exercise of state power and
legal prosecution/persecution. They will not allow their people to shoot themselves in the foot by being
“too libertarian” to the point of absurdity by ignoring obvious abuses of the free market. If they see city
dwellers falling prey to leftist propaganda, they will step in and stop it. A real libertarian king will do
what he must to provide healthy free markets by forcibly breaking up monopolies. This means
authoritarianism for the purpose of creating healthy anarchy! This means no moving into overcrowded
cities without proven good reason. This means no profiting off cheap labor of the Chinese to make
money on European markets. This means Nationalism! Only rich people will benefit if we allow
international trading on a mass scale, because only those with extra money to spend on “travel” will
have a competitive advantage in the market. The people we want to compete in the market are
probably so poor, they couldn’t even visit China once, let alone operate a business there! National
Socialists would see “real socialist policy” along the lines of being highly skeptical of all international
travel that isn’t purely of “tourism”. Another “real socialist policy” is to restrict the dispersion of items
that are so scarce and rare that they absolutely must be sourced from another culture, race, or nation. I
call myself a libertarian anarchist, yet I also say the state should handle dispersion of rare international
items! Any libertarian worth his weight should now ridicule me as a statist and say I am offering a
competitive advantage that is unfairly given to those business who are in cahoots with the state! At this
point I put on my National Socialist mask and say I’m using the state to protect my “race” from
“globalists” aka “Zionist Jews” who are using predatory international capitalism to assert themselves as
“master race” over all other races. Everyone knows the matriarchal Jews are obsessed with genetic
lineage and “real Jews” are only racial, not religious. So basically, unfairness in the market, granted by
Zionist privilege, can’t easily be tackled through marriage. The idea is that attractive females who are
less privileged can “tackle” privileges by marrying those who have them. Through marriage these
privileges may be “liberated” to the general population in a controlled, organic, natural manner. But if
Zionist Jews are reluctant to race-mix like they are, we should assign “their privileges” to the state and
let each ethnostate organically spread special privileges through marriage, by “withholding intimacy”!

The evils of special privilege as between two classes that do and do not have an economic
“privilege” can be mitigated through what may be called “racial unity”. The power of attraction may
allow marriage between different classes in a “racially unified” or “reproductively compatible”
ethnostate. Racism is only as real as unattractiveness between potential mates belonging to different
classes makes it! This is precisely why the left is so hell-bent on forcing race-mixing upon everyone
except them! It’s all about liberating class privilege through attractiveness of potential females to
reproduce with. But if the kids won’t resemble you, that’s a major deterrent to mixing with an attractive
female that looks different enough to “belong to another race”. If all economic classes belong to “the
same race”, then any hypothetical tyranny of a privileged class can be “tackled” by spontaneous arrival
of new female specimens who are attractive enough to compel marriage and reproduction. Now the
attractive specimen from the “lower class” can succeed in redesigning the virtues of the kids of the
tyrannical, making their tyranny reduce gradually or perhaps rapidly. Like magic, the “racial unity” may
end all problems of class tyranny organically. This is difficult with Jews, however! We must assign their
privileges to an honorable state regime!

Of course, in referring to “Jewish privileges”, I mean international trade in general, which should
be virtually negligible in a healthy National Socialist economy. But there may be a necessity, in
considering things like oil, to import or export goods to other nations, and it’s important that control of
these goods isn’t given to predatory and arbitrary anti-Nationalist interests like “Zionist Jews” or
“globalists” who are actively creating fortunes while simultaneously disturbing the national economy. If
there is a fortune to make, it would be preferable to keep it distributed amongst members of the same
race that is being exploited, so reproductive compatibility and marriage may render the acquisitions
organically distributable among all classes within said “race”. Obviously, it’s a good old-fashioned
libertarian free market principle that wealth shall get distributed naturally among the classes through
“employment” because women usually aren’t willing to have a hundred kids to which maintenance of
businesses’ operations may be inherited. And anyone womanizing a hundred wives will face the wrath
of legal prosecution by his probably-unwilling wives. So the principle of “racial unity” is time-tested and
holds up to scrutiny!

The goal of pure Libertarian, Anarchist abolition of all states may create conditions which are
more conducive to the survival of the white race. But it is naïve to believe that white genocide may be
reliably reversed by simply pursuing pure Libertarian strategy. Contrary to “pure Libertarian theory”, I
believe the conversion of the state to a National Socialist regime is the best way to achieve goals which
are more important than the common conception of “liberty” – namely, the survival of the white race
and the systematic elimination of all “racism” forever. My fear is that instant anarchy will leave the
white minority defenseless against bullying. When businesses participate in a program of racial
preservation using pro-white discrimination, I fear that non-whites will claim “rights violations” by
appealing to their status as “human”, and disrespect the white separatists’ rights to consider non-whites
essentially non-human from their perspective due to “reproductive incompatibility”. If courts fail to
recognize the propensity of formal segregation to end all racism forever, I fear that “mixed geography”
will render “racist” businesses susceptible to boycott-holocaust and terrorism against their patrons.
Boycott shall economically doom all business to the involuntary promotion of the agenda of white
genocide. Libertarianism alone does not guarantee that, when the time comes for physical segregation
to end racism, the courts will uphold religious rights of white people to preserve their recessive
phenotype. Everyone will sadly be bullied into ignoring the inherently anti-white racism of society.
Asserting the religious right to racial preservation for the white minority shall be the responsibility of a
National Socialist rendition of the state. Strict “liberty” shall be subordinated to the task of ending
society’s anti-white racism, and it shall be permissible to use “state coercion” to override court decisions
contrary to the strategy of ending white genocide. National Socialists have discovered the holy grail of
ending all violence forever, and we shall not hesitate to use temporary violence to achieve this holy
grail. Traitors to our cause will be guilty of conspiracy to perpetuate eternal racism! In short, if one
cannot fathom the mechanics of using temporary racism to end all long-term racism, they have failed
the Darwinist intelligence test and must be removed from the gene pool!

WORLD WARS VS NATIONALISM

From the vantage point through the lens of awareness of globalist conspiracy it may become
obvious that those with a vested interest in plutocratic “democratic” machinery, were responsible for
atrocities like the assassination of, what I will argue were legitimate, regimes of lingering
monarchist/aristocratic/feudalist lineage and institution. I think the most reasonable far-right summary
in the analysis of World War 1 is that Zionist-globalist conspirators observed problems in asserting their
corrupt influence upon the likes of Franz Ferdinand, and therefore used globalist intrigue, perhaps
indirectly, to shift resources toward the location and situation of a “trap” in Serbia (or wherever it was)
and, perhaps indirectly, paid assassins to instigate turmoil, potentially including advanced machinations
designed through the planting of agents (sold-out to their cause in various manners) into positions of
military/political/market influence to exacerbate the devastation, primarily through or involving war,
with the goal of having strategic influence in the “reconstruction efforts” and resultant designs enabling
more-globalist political institutions for future more-heavy-control-measures of a more-Zionist
persuasion in Hegelian Dialectic manner. The evil people, who use murder tactically, are genuinely
invested in the destruction of obviously, relatively-more-good-and-just government institutions, because
in/during World War 1 times, the nature of media manipulation was not conceivably advanced enough
to permit and account for the tortuous logic involved in “opposition to controlled opposition”, as may
well be the case today, according to most conspiracy theorists. So “what you saw was what you got” and
“things” were thus more straight-forward relative to today. Given a straight-forward globalist
conspiracy, it stands to reason that the monarchy against which “the evil” conspired in murder, was
relatively “good” compared to the institutions that, by evil, evolved in the aftermath of such atrocity.
The atrocity was therefore obviously of “means” to equally-atrocious “ends”. Namely, the evil of
resultant, relative, “democracy” was said “ends” to said “means” involving assassination and war. Over
100 years before the Ferdinand assassination that kicked off World War 1, the events that led to
tortuous payback-for-paybacks, were initiated by a collection of anti-Nationalist actions in Serbia.
Basically a “monarchist” dynasty betrayed proper Nationalist ideals by negotiating concessions with the
foreign Ottoman empire occupying Serbia, and this eventually resulted in justified payback by a different
“dynasty” of an equally-but-perhaps-differently-globalist slant that had previously done more to oppose
Ottoman authority over Serbia. If a Serbian “dynasty” had never permitted themselves to essentially
become Ottoman subjects – that is, if they had been true Nationalists – the domino effect leading to
World War 1 would never have begun!

PREDICTIVE PROGRAMMING

The way “predictive programming” truly works is ultimately all about ridiculing people who
inevitably identify an issue as serious in the real world, through preemptively broadcasting said idea in a
non-serious manner. In matters of communism, anarchy, National Socialism, racism, conspiracy, etc., the
elite use a tactic of “taking” issues that would, in a serious context, exert some measure of discomfort
upon their positions of power, making said positions more untenable by virtue of serious advocates of
heightening public awareness of what they’re doing and supporting. When they “take” these issues,
what they aim to do is to render these issues more “ridiculous” by making a fake Hollywood version of
it, for example, in order to cloud people’s judgment about what extent of said issues is real and how
much of it is simply imaginative. Ostensibly they aim to decrease the tendency to judge a serious issue
as real, and increase its tendency to be judged as imaginative, and therefore no longer “serious” at all.
They will make people laugh at truly serious issues just because Hollywood made a story out of it. This
happens because of the introduction of a possibility and perceived probability that a hypothetical
serious conspiracy theorist just “got their idea” from the movie, for example. They will respond to said
conspiracy theorist jocularly, saying “Haha, you’re just like that movie, haha!” and thereby rest assured
that they have the “upper hand” and are “more intelligent” than the conspiracy theorist by virtue of the
fact that they’ve “seen more movies” and thereby have ostensibly heard of “that idea” before it was
conceived of and/or presented to them by the conspiracy theorist, and they will therefore become even
more assured that the theory is preposterous due to the possibility that the imaginative movie version
of the theory was “around” longer than the serious-natured rendition of the theory as “real-life”, which
a conspiracy theorist is trying to spread the truth of. Botched versions of the theory can also be spread,
preemptively, to make people immune to the coming real version of the theory, through haughty
“superiority” and annoyance at hearing something they think has already been “debunked” in various
ways.

PARAMETERS OF MODERN SLAVERY

 Property taxes, high rent, and Federal Reserve inflation are connected in a relatively straight-
forward and obvious manner to induce a system of modern slavery. Zionists have occupied high-salary
banker positions and government positions over many generations to “dominate the dominators” of the
real estate industry while simultaneously devaluing the currency, using such tactics as the removal of
the gold standard and requiring “socialist” property taxes for “public property” to prevent immunity
from the overall mechanism of enslavement. We can’t properly organize without “becoming internet
trolls” due to occupation of jobs that require at least 40 hours a week, which we require only due to the
fact of universal, artificially high rent. The property management companies must charge us such high
rent only because the rent of their employees is similarly too high. The obvious manner in which such an
awkward state of affairs is possible involves the big-money corporate domination of the real estate
industry. Basically, the valueless paper money is circulated with more units, to benefit the big Zionist
bankers, who collude with those given an inside knowledge of the inflation agenda/schedule, and
arrange to profit by it, through the allocation of investments related to real estate, such that they enjoy
the lower-relative-cost of goods, afforded by “first waves” of said money circulation followed by
inflation, and pass the negative effects of price-increases downstream to less-privileged common folk.
No one can escape the monetary and real estate control completely, because property taxes will always
be taken for granted, as no one recognizes it as theft and extortion. According to plutocratic agenda, it is
obvious that virtually the same people who are controlling the causes of high rent, are using the
government-sponsored printing of worthless money to maintain “socialist” enslavement, through
requiring property taxes.

UNDERSTANDING THE STATE

The modern state is related to the black market surrounding pedophilia. The reason for the
state as a monopolist on justice is to provide control over justice for the purpose of manipulating the
application of said justice. They say “let us take care of the bad guys” because they may want to protect
privileged bad guys who provide mutual support to the state. The monpolistic features of the state
ensure that anyone who may discover their pedophilia market will be silenced through torture and
alleged suicide a la Jeffrey Epstein. Hidden History by Donald Jeffries is full of examples of conspiratorial
murders forcibly masked as suicides through the exercise of authority structures inherent in state justice
systems. Basically, dirty cops exert control over other dirty cops who are blackmailed into cooperation.
Hans-Hermann Hoppe contemplates the ascent of the state as a monopoly on justice without
considering the fact that Donald Jeffries presents involving the going missing of over 100,000 children
every year in the United States since the 1980’s. The fundamental weirdness of most cops is a
psychological artifact of exposure to the karma of acquaintances aiding protection of child sex slave
trafficking, and it is compounded by nasty habits like excessive alcohol consumption as a coping
mechanism on days off. Leftists subconsciously support increased central authority and as we know
from Alex Jones and PizzaGate, the Clinton body count in associated with pedophile networks. Alex
Jones is basically “far-right”. Most laugh at Alex Jones shouting about pedophiles running the world, but
he is not joking or lying. Leftists, centrists, and conservatives who neglect to listen to Alex Jones are
subconsciously supporting globalism, which in turn supports pedophilia. Tariffs are a good start, and
hardcore isolationism is even better. Simply put, justice or lack thereof may originate in one state if not
another, and under modern auspices of globalism, all states coexist seamlessly, and globalists inherently
support organized pedophilia in child sex-slave trafficking between states.

SECRETS AND GENETIC COMMUNISM VIA MONARCHISM

 Just because you’re lucky enough to find an infinite oil well doesn’t mean you get to have
thousands of kids, each with infinite wealth. This does not improve the gene pool in any way. Think of
“secrets” in terms of the location of an infinite oil well that could sustain humans forever. A king would
decide appropriate reward for the discoverer of this secret and appropriate dispersion methods of the
natural resources. I’m a true anarchist first and foremost, so secrets being kept by force are abhorrent to
me. The manner of my personal form of “genetic communism” is a peculiar form of “environmentalism”
which I believe to assert a reverence required by humans for being part of an inhabited system of
genetic information with the implications of “take a penny, leave a penny” such that people should
divulge secrets of productivity, like patents. This is just a principle however, so I don’t necessarily believe
in “democratic laws” forcing people to cooperate with expectations of the masses. That being said, as a
true anarchist, I intend at all costs to promote the emergence of a system with as few rulers as possible,
and this requires advancement toward a single ruler (monarchy) followed by feudalism as a natural
order arises in the competition of a free market for “rulership” such that new rulers may replace less-
just rulers. A monopoly on kingship is okay if it is genuinely in the interests of the people of a nation in a
spontaneous and organic manner, with the goal in mind of establishing conditions allowing other king-
monopolies to compete via “nationalism” as opposed to “globalism”. Indeed, self-sacrifice in a “true
king” would be a requisite at some point. In the interest of minimizing the keeping of secrets from some
people by some other people, I believe the ability to discover secrets should be contained within a
Fuehrer’s chosen system. Secrets kept by many from many others under democracy must transform first
into monarchy then into feudalism aka aristocracy in order to undo the various facets of leftist
degeneration.

POLITICAL SEGREGATION

Obviously upon agreeing with the turbo-fascist nature which is the basis of this book and its
author, one should recognize the need to split the United States into left vs right nations to allow the
communists to destroy themselves and leave us alone. But the situation is quite desperate because we
need to make Trump king of the “right” nation but simultaneously become the “master nation” over the
“left” nation because any reasonable observer of the status quo will realize it’s only a matter of time
before the “left” nation attacks itself and blames the attack on us to instigate perpetual war. This
situation is desperate enough to warrant immediate war on communists like Ann Coulter suggests, and
to send leftists to Guantanamo Bay and forcefully impose conditions on them as humanely as their
reluctance to be leftist will allow. In any case it’s obvious to any radical right-winger that the time for
voting is OVER.

NATIONALIST DENIALS

Nationalist tend to say “I’m not a Nazi! Socialism is stupid!” They don’t grasp the connotations
of the word “social” under a Nationalist (anti-democratic) context. There must be a reason why Nazi’s
hated communists…. NatSoc vs Communism is almost like 2 sides of the same coin because both are
using methods of authoritarianism and collectivism that may seem similar except in terms of their long-
term goals. NatSoc is oriented towards the creation of a truly free market, helping the poor, whereas
communism is oriented towards plutocratic control of the market through central planning, hurting the
moderately wealthy.

SOCIAL TRUST
 Social trust is a prerequisite in functional AnCap – “you must be from the same nation as me”
should mean something…

FURTHERANCE OF DAVID BOWIE

David Bowie said “Fascism is really just Nationalism”. I will go a step further and amend this to
say that fascism is “social nationalism” which is another term for National Socialism and National
Socialism is a far-right phenomenon that seeks to establish the same things described by AnCap – i.e.
the word “socialism” need not include leftist connotation. Modern socialism is “democratic socialism”
and is primarily a globalist preparation for communism. The practice of calling National Socialism
“leftist” is not serious in nature, it is a practice that seeks to disassociate “right wing philosophy” from
Holocaust related genocide. This “leftist accusation” is a ridiculous practice when one studies both
Holocaust Denial and the economic miracles of the NatSoc Deutschmarks.

CLARIFICATION OF DAVID BOWIE

The primary purpose of David Bowie’s “fascism”, which he says is simply identical to
“nationalism”, and which I venture to redefine as “social nationalism”, which upon redemption of
“Holocaust denial” may be rendered as identical to Hitler’s National Socialism, is to prevent the
“breakdown of social trust”. “Social trust” is what breaks down when a typical leftist buffoon of a
different race than you loses an argument to you, and as a cornered snake, lashes out in false
accusations of closeted racism on your part as motivating the instigation of conflict, in an attempt to
divert attention away from the loss of the argument on their part. This is a nasty mind-trick involving the
intentional confusing of “correlation” for “causation”. As a cornerstone of what I like to define as “social
communism”, this mind-trick is used by leftists as a social maneuver to bully, by presenting a “difference
in race” as the “cause” of agitation simply because said agitation is “correlated” with people of
“different races”. “Social communism” is at play in such leftist machinations as accusing MAGA hats of
being “racist” simply because slavery happened in the past and the “MAGA” label claims America was
better in the past, therefore presenting a claim of “causation” when only simple “correlation” can be
observed. These are the mind-tricks of a type of bullying which claims the “moral high ground”. Fascism
legitimizes the separation of social groups voluntarily identifying with race, primarily.

VERSIONS OF DEMOCRATIC MOB RULE

It is not necessarily a good or bad thing, but simply a reality, to observe that “the only real form”
of democracy is “mob rule” or “rule by the 51+%” or majority. The commonly accepted form of
“democracy” is inevitably a false form of democracy that is truly a plutocracy. It is usual that the
plutocratic form of “democracy” particularly involves forms of “voting” on issues or representatives
where each “person” or qualifying “voter” gets 1 vote. Plutocrats can do many things to exert their
control under the guise of this “vote-based” democracy, such as rigging voting machines, controlling the
propositions which are subsequently voted on and passed or not passed, or controlling puppets who are
given a vested interest in their plutocratic controllers and, if elected fairly or unfairly, will guarantee
access to the commandeering of control of capital stock of resources stolen from “citizens” at gunpoint,
aka “tax extortion”. The “real form” of democracy only arises spontaneously and physically by mob rule
of actual proximal mobs exerting actual force over people inhabiting immediate environments. That is to
say, non-plutocratic democracies are completely physical in nature. The characteristic of any
conceivable virtue of any “real democracy” is attributable to the force exerted by a particular “armed
force or militia”.

ADDRESSING THE JEWISH QUESTION (JQ)

When we address the Jewish Question (JQ) we are not wondering what should be done about racial
Hebrews, but rather specifically those synagogue members seeking to use Talmudic intrigue to elevate
their race internationally and, recently, using access to Israeli genetic citizenship testing. “Mongrels” half
breeds are being used a spawns to establish as inherently virtuous the culture-deconstruction tactic of
institutionalized race-mixing, and there is nothing bad about the mongrels themselves, but they are a
product of an effort to legitimize globalism and supplant monocultures, aiding popular acceptance of
social and fiscal values of communism. The Bolshevik-Marxist-Zionist-Jewish elite is like a matador
choreographing a dance of death with a bull which represents Mongrels and Negroes, and this matador
uses the Aryan whites as his red cloth to infuriate the bull, sacrificing both red cloth and bull with hidden
sword in a simultaneous bait and attack to eternally globally dominate the arena as “God’s chosen
master race” given the idea of God as the arena itself. The JQ must be tackled by Aryans in cooperation
with the bull and all promoters of various leftist agendas should be formally quarantined through an
evolved manifestation of gerrymandering. Formal validation of benevolent fascism shall ultimately
disrupt the Zionist matador’s choreography!

HOLOHOAX

National Socialists and most of their sympathizers usually recognize that “German gas chambers used to
kill Jews” was a lie, a hoax, created by Russian and Jewish communists in order to frame the Nazis for
the purpose of manufacturing American support for Allied forces in WW2, getting most Americans to
believe, upon reading any newspaper, that Nazis are the epitome of evil and that Jews are the “most
oppressed” among all races and religions. The Holocaust hoax had the intended effect of eclipsing
international recognition of the Holodomor, which was the communist Russian starvation of Christians
totaling half the population. Even to those few who know about the Holodomor, its evils are eclipsed by
the supposedly more serious and problematic evil of “exterminating Jews” in the Holocaust, such that it
may be said, “Well, the Holodomor was bad, but at least it wasn’t as bad as the Holocaust, so America
made the right choice in WW2 by siding with communists to kill Nazis!” Nevertheless, the gas chambers
are destined to make a glorious comeback within perhaps a century when the Nazis are vindicated and
the evils of leftist and communist agents are recognized as full treason against America, Germany,
Russia, and much of the Earth. Though currently NONE DARE CALL IT TREASON, it is possible that when
enough people wake up to the McCarthyist invasion of America by undercover communist agents, trials
by jury may convict perhaps 100,000 to even a million leftists to the sentence of death. Obviously,
common methods of execution may take over 50 years to be carried out on a million “death row
inmates” so it may make practical and financial sense to “get it over with” by constructing real gas
chambers (like the communists tricked us into fighting World War 2 over) so we can dispose of traitors
in America quickly and cost-effectively. A very ironic side effect to the reality of gas chambers shall be
the repayment of the tragedy that befell National Socialists with a cathartic form of humor.

ADDICTION

Addictive drugs that only stimulate the 3 lower egoic chakras and result in hangovers and
physical addiction upon vigorous use (opiates, alcohol, and cocaine) are openly promoted in the media
of the Zionist Jew masters because of their propensity to create a dysfunctional system in which the
masses “give in” to their addictions and choose to remain all the more dependent on handouts in
particular, potentially providing validation for continued use of homeless shelter services, such that
these may increase exponentially system-wide. Zionist Jew masters are peculiarly wary of Ron Paul’s
method of curing black market violence (decriminalization to reduce profits) because of many reasons,
including violence stimulation to necessitate increased legal intervention by government, the creating of
rich rappers to glorify the profiteering off drug users, and the keeping of drug prices high enough to
maintain required welfare-funding of drug addiction, which promotes continued government theft
through Robin-Hoodish taxation. On the other hand, high chakra drugs (entheogens/psychedelics)
continue to be labeled “bad” or “weird” because their accepted use would not only cleanse the masses
of depressive atheism and socially communist and Zionist values, but make smart people more
productive, creative, and happy at work and thereby more successful and faithful in believing the
promises of government-independence and truly anarchist capitalism. The easiest-to-recognize example
of what the Jew masters want you to do is whatever gets promoted by popular and successful rappers.
Unfortunately it so happens that people are cattle for Zionist Jews and these Gentile Goys are short-
sighted enough to believe that low-chakra egoic drugs that temporarily increase social stimulation are
beneficial to their search for females, despite long-term hangovers and addiction. Wise long-term
investment in consuming psychedelics (in the manner of spiritual weightlifting) is seen as “weird and
anti-social”, because they promote right-wing values, ultimately and essentially. The insanity thus
described is intended by Zionist Jew masters to continue until “the flood gates are opened” to release a
wave of zombies upon initiation of dirt-cheap prices through the long-put-off common sense of
legalization, thereby necessitating government funding of homeless shelter services for highly pitiable
humans (zombies).

HOLY TRINITY

Gnosticism, Agnosticism, and Satanism are, in my opinion, like the holy trinity to a fully
enlightened Christian, and the Zionist Jews hate the implications these have against the type of
institutionalized, supposedly “humanist” Atheism they invest in, packaged together with socially
Communist values. The Zionist Jews want Christ, in a sacrificial sense, to be an example of what YOU
should become in light of the truly “humanist” purpose of consuming psychedelics/entheogens. What
the Zionist Jew masters really think about a lot is what would happen to the masses if all drugs were
legal and therefore inexpensive, and if those masses that inevitably availed themselves of the “good
drugs” vs the “bad drugs” decided either to work or to not work for survival. Their Zionist Jewish
position, amongst a society where most people have decided to live out of homeless shelters and do
drugs all day instead of working, is heavily pondered in their Zionist Jewish mind. Signs seem to
obviously point toward a form of Communism in which hegemonic Zionist Jews are racial masters and
drug-consuming peons work for only their own food (if at all) and don’t have guns and are too drug-
addled to defend against extermination either by Zionist Jews themselves or by foreign, Zionist-paid
armies, and upon said extermination, said Zionist Jews may have unlimited offspring upon ethnic
cleansing of city after city, presumably after completion of the scheduled genocide and Mongrelization
of the white race. Of course, full Communism on a global scale is “around the corner” only upon popular
acceptance of low-chakra egoic drugs, and corresponding parasitic lifestyles of atheists who have given
up spiritually and therefore seek in life only to propagate Zionist Jewish values on behalf of their Zionist
Jewish masters. Jews in general are quite overt in their disbelief in the afterlife, so they project a sense
of negative Nihilism that favors Communist values – particularly those that promote hegemony by the
Jews and their Rabbis.

RUMINATIONS ON THE AFTERLIFE

In the spirit of being correct, I will address an issue that shouldn’t matter, but may have impact
on internal convictions that have associative consequences for leftism and rightism. The way we value
life and prioritize “humanitarian missions” can theoretically be impacted by our understanding of the
existence, or nature, of the afterlife. I hope that volunteering an air of correctness about one major
aspect of existence (the afterlife) could only influence positively another major aspect (position on the
left-right spectrum). The way I see it, the afterlife must take on the character of either being under
anesthesia (nihilism or atheism) or being on a heroic dose of ayahuasca or sacred mushrooms
(Gnosticism). I consider us, as humans, infinitely blessed with extremely strong suggestions from our
advanced scientific developments that make it easy to have confidence in knowing, as opposed to faith
or belief, that the answer objectively lies in the realm of serotonergic psychedelics providing the true
preview of the afterlife situation, and not the anesthesia. When we “black out” on anesthesia, our soul
or spiritual energy is undergoing disturbance from a purely synthetic molecule, and the energy in our
nerves temporarily turns away from the direction of “life”, to an askance blindspot between this life and
the afterlife. I have no confidence in the idea that the anesthesia “black out” is a true depiction of the
afterlife, because the energy of the soul continues, embedded, in the neurons of the body to sustain life.
Thus the soul’s energy has not made the full, necessary departure from the body that would produce
the hypothetical range of experiences inherent to “the afterlife”. Of course, this same argument could
be applied to psychedelics, but instead I will appeal to the context surrounding the sacred mushroom
and ayahuasca vine in the sense that, what seems to be a benevolent God, given the existence of fruits
in particular, has put the sacred mushroom on Earth for us to find. The ayahuasca vine is harder to
prepare, because of intelligence necessary to brew it, but once a primate has ventured, as a species, to
evolve its soul with sacred mushrooms, probably sent as spores on asteroids from another star system,
the ayahuasca vine waits with a more compelling experience, to convince the primates that “the
afterlife” is more abundant to the senses than “this life”. That is obvious to anyone who takes a heroic
dose, but to the law-abiding citizen, science awaits to satisfy the curiosity sufficiently. The molecule of
psilocybin or DMT has a “backwards” electron signature compared to serotonin, which it closely
resembles. Science makes it apparent that the soul which ordinarily gears “forward” through serotonin-
neurons into “this life” instead gears “backwards” into “the afterlife” when a heroic dose of sacred
mushrooms or ayahuasca vine is administered. Thus, it is not absolutely necessary to experience this
“afterlife” for yourself to take the hint that the “heroic dosers” are practically yelling at everyone. In any
case, most people with good karma and intelligence should have had enough dream experiences to
convince themselves that something “extra” besides simple brain activity is producing miracles during
dreams, and it is greater than simply “the brain entertaining itself”. Science suggests that dreams are
triggered by DMT being produced endogenously by the brain’s pineal gland, which goes a long way in
explaining the miracles of heroic doses and dreams simultaneously. I’m thoroughly convinced that the
afterlife isn’t permanent anesthesia black-out, not that such a prospect isn’t appealing to me. Indeed,
this prospect may scare people into negative atheism/nihilism that impacts their hysteria about utopia
in this life, badly. I think an incorrect view of the afterlife may lead to militant leftism that seeks
retribution for poor people, forcibly, through overemphasized urgency for orientation-correction in this
“only” life. Certainly my right-wing views of social Darwinism have been practically put on steroids as a
result of my Gnosticism, heroic dosing, and familiarity with the afterlife.
CHRISTIANITY OVER JUDAISM

Christians are “effectually more correct” than the Jews who are “technically more correct” in
their appraisal of the nature of Christ. But Gnostics trudge even deeper into the grime of ideological and
religious grit in terms of the nature of Christ, and the Satanic Eucharist goes the deepest into the grime
of ideological and religious grit. Jews have no heart for the transference of individual sacrifice to
collective Enlightenment, and thus from me earn no reward for their version of validity in observing the
nature of Christ as man and not God, and I award their allotted share of ideological value to the
Christians who recognize that Christ’s attainment of “God status” derives precisely from his lack of “God
status” – indeed it is only by not “being God” that Christ is God. The mechanics involved in this illogical
truth arise from the interplay between personal missions undertaken by an individual and the unlocking
of greater levels of Enlightenment for the community. These personal missions involved profoundly
romantic self-sacrifice by the character of Christ in his crucifixion. At this point in the logic of religion, I
summarily declare Judaism null and void in light of superior Christianity, and the course taken by
historical events encourages me to permit Christians every right to pursue Jews as a libelous nuisance to
be formally shunned in a fascist manner. To tackle the Gnostic situation, it would help to observe that a
Gnostic person should basically be considered a Christian who has reached personal Enlightenment. The
remaining consideration to make is a heavy one, full of political implications, and it is basically just the
arguable fact that, according to Gnostics, Christ is an elaborate metaphor for sacred mushrooms and the
man who consumes them in the context of legal persecution. To tackle the Satanist situation requires
the swallowing of an even bigger pill – namely, that child sex slaves today meet a worse fate and more
terrible life story than that of crucified Christ when they are tortured to death by the thousands every
year through an arguably inherently Zionist black market that ultimately produces a Satanic Eucharist
(for communion with a living form of “Christ”) that elicits more profound meditations on human nature
than regular Christian Christ. This Eucharist is called “adrenochrome” and it is extracted in elevated
amounts from the adrenal glands of said tortured child sex slaves, and is consumed as a drug by said
Satanists, in their own form of communion, as the true “flesh of Christ”. The supremacy of the cross as a
symbol for collective Enlightenment renders valid all intolerance of Judaism, and the evolution of the
visual form of the cross as it corresponds to anti-Semitic and entheogenic/psychedelic political/religious
movements may be aesthetically pleasing to those seeking Enlightenment as well as those currently
basking in it. Meanings of such things as “axis lines”, horizontal vs vertical “spectra”, and ideological
diversions may be applied to the cross of Christianity and the upside-down cross of Satanism, while the
Star of David remains utterly retarded in the evaluation of any sensible esoteric observer. These
aesthetics transfer handsomely to the iron cross of World War 1 Germany and the hooked-cross
swastika of far-right World War 2 National Socialists. Nothing can be more Christian than fighting the
international gang of Jew Communists. Nothing can be more Satanic than worshipping the name Adolf
Hitler.

ETHNOSTATE

I now hope to present at least partial apologetics for the “technical lack of anarchy/capitalism”
and corresponding “ostensible presence of a form of communism” inherent in a hypothetical one-race-
only ethnostate. This hypothetical government will probably “rearrange money” to some extent, but I
insist that the potential for long-term evil to arise from this “authoritarian redistribution of wealth” will
be minimized by the principle of general “reproductive compatibility” between all humans in the state,
including that between citizens and government officials. When the government chooses which
individuals receive wealth by sponsorship of particular companies, this is not anarchistic in principle, but
the “favoritism” may be spread evenly among the population through marriage in a way, by virtue of the
one-race principle. This is only really problematic for “social trust” in government if the state is multi-
ethnic, by virtue of increasingly rampant claims of “racism” and corresponding reactions by way of
institutionalized “affirmative action”.

In response to the rise of violent “white nationalists” heavily televised on mass media, I believe
the correct method towards a solution is not “gun bans”, but a “trading spaces” program. Imagine a
“government” taking a racial census of every house in a few states (maybe 3 main states: white, black,
and Hispanic) and forcing all whites to occupy houses of a similar size, previously owned by blacks and
Hispanics, and vice versa for all the major races. A minor complication would involve businesses and
employees, or the business contacts and contracts with other businesses, and their switching to another
state. But however complicated this may seem, it’s far from impossible and certainly not more
expensive than the annual foreign aid budget we already waste on propping up communist regimes.
“Reparations for slavery” is not nearly as good an idea as “reparations for people forced to move and
find a new job in a racially homogenous state”. The cost of “gun bans” alone would cover the repairs of
a new home of a similar size into which people have been forced to move into their racially homogenous
state. This is the way to end all racial violence forever! Larger ethnonations will be established after the
success of smaller ethnostates. People who, for various reasons, insist that their quality of life depends
upon miscegenation, shall be allowed to stay in or move to “regular mixed states”.

AGAINST FOREIGN AID

Foreign aid can hurt foreign people because their real capital (equipment, land, labor) is scarce,
and placing money (buying power) in the hands of government “central planners” and allowing them to
arbitrarily “use it”, effectively steals opportunities from, and/or raises prices for, honest, regular, free-
market, private entrepreneurs. So it is easy to comprehend how “foreign aid” to another state
government actually actively sabotages people in that country, reduces their freedom, and raises the
cost of living, thriving, or starting/running businesses. Don’t put bullies on steroids!

THE END OF RACISM

There are only two ultimate sides to the question of utmost importance – that of ending racism.
One method is to genocide whites and the other method is to create a white ethnostate. The
communists want to “kill racists”, which would unintentionally (or perhaps intentionally) put racists “in
the closet” and the only really acceptable way to prove one is not a white racist is to have mixed kids.
When a “white” has a mixed child, the child doesn’t “look white” and is generally considered a “non-
white”, so if every “white” is forced to have mixed kids, that is essentially the achieved effect of “white
genocide”. The closeted racists may be business owners or upper management personnel, and it may
take many years to guess, with any certainty, that they are indeed racist because of a reluctance to
promote “non-whites” to a higher salary. The possibility of just such a scenario is a leftist argument in
favor of a bigger “Nanny State” government which could forcibly remedy such a social problem through
regulations and revoking of certain “free market” rights. The National Socialists (essentially openly anti-
communists) want to end racism by simply creating a white ethnostate. All racists will simply move to
the all-white nation if they are given money to satisfy their losses from relinquishing all property they
may have owned in the original nation that is not necessarily “all-white”. It is reasonable to assume that
the National Socialist strategy will be extremely effective, as long as the “all-white ethnostate” is not
extremely impoverished or something. The problem of where to find the money necessary to “pay back”
peoples’ property from relocation may be easily solved by ending the continuous theft of trillions of
dollars of taxpayer money currently ongoing by virtue of the Federal Reserve operation. Obviously then,
one of the first tasks of a National Socialist or Libertarian government is to abolish the Federal Reserve.

EVIL OF RACISM

An analysis of the phenomenon, whereby all mention of racial priorities, seems inherently evil, is
in order. When we break this down, its constituent parts are not logically evil at all. Primarily, we must
not consider it evil to assume that a reproductive preference and attraction to females of the same race
may exist in oneself and, importantly, may be inherited by children of both oneself and other members
of the same race. We have not yet, thankfully, come to the cultural conclusion that this form of racism is
evil, but it seems obviously inevitable according to the pattern of “progressivism”. It is useful to call that
person a “brother” whose kids will be “reproductively compatible” with one’s own kids. About this
“reproductive compatibility”, let it suffice to say that there are culturally important implications in
having a child that bears a resemblance to oneself. An enlightened view of religious feeling permits
analysis of the thoughts of a child concerning his destiny in its relation to what the father has done, for
example, compounded with childish considerations of what said child sees in the mirror juxtaposed to
what the father thought when he looked in the mirror. Further, venture to consider the religious
motivation in mate-selection when one and one’s father estimates his own attractiveness vs ability to
earn a living and provide for a family. We can quickly discover a development of biological aesthetic
culture that amounts to “racism” when one seriously critiques time allotted to selection of friends
whose children may or may not be “reproductively compatible” with one’s own children. Time devoted
to being financially productive vs finding potential mates easily translates to lifestyle choice which
amounts to “cultural ideals”. Racial religion and culture dictate creativity and ideals which may be
different between races. Sharing a government with another race may understandably not be tolerated
by high-functioning idealists. It is easy to understand annoyance at having to share time and space with
those of another race or culture, and we clearly begin to realize that fascism is not evil, but on the
contrary is in fact a highest religious aspiration. Assuming a divine order, it seems quite reasonable that
there may exist a critical threshold at which increasing the chances of finding a mate impacts the divine
plan of spiritual harmony associated with widespread discovery of every person’s soul mate. In a racially
mixed society, it is reasonable to believe the chances of finding a “soul mate” that is “reproductively
compatible” will more than double upon the advent of exclusive ethnostates where each race may
relocate in order to be surrounded by only members of the same race. Along this line of thought it
would seem likely that the real “Satan” is Zionist institutionalized race-mixing, and that God is waiting to
be ushered into existence by way of formal legitimacy of racial fascism and ethnostate formation. If this
is so, then all praise be to our God whose name is Kek.

The reason for the discomfort and awkwardness surrounding all discussion of race in terms of a
direct result in the realm of social interactions is because, ultimately, the root of the issue is the
inherently awkward idea of “sexual conquest”. When someone says their social status is directly related
to their race, they are invading into a realm of thought to which the only response is silence. It’s very
similar to the invasion of a pervert who, talking to a married couple, suddenly blurts out how lucky he
thinks the male is. Even the “most racist” person can, ultimately only proclaim “pride” in their race in
the sense that his “sexual conquest” is satisfied because reproduction with a compatibly similar female
will produce a child who feels a “vertically descendant” sense of belonging and biologically divine
providence which will, at adolescence, gain the character of a similar sense of “sexual conquest” to be
satisfied with his own sense of “horizontally compatible” status with another similar-phenotype
“female”, and so on, ad infinitum. It’s a form of intra-racial love that involves the seeking of maximum
“variety” from which to allow children and grandchildren to choose for satisfaction of this “sexual
conquest”, and it’s expressed any time a person of a particular race claims “pride” to a another member
of their race. Insisting on proclaiming “racial pride” to a person of another race is as awkward as a
married man telling a pervert how awesome it is to be married. In both cases, the root of the
conversation is something that warrants no intellectual content. The prevailing themes can only be
“jealousy and bragging with no substance”, because the aesthetic value of the content is biological and
religious, or sensational and sublime, to be consumed personally and enjoyed separately from others.
There is no transferrable sharing without distorting the sanctity of the topic with appeals to “discomfort
and awkwardness”. It’s like looking at Michael Jackson’s face – the substance of what’s being absorbed
in the mind has no fulfilling ontological value. The perversion of such activity derives from its inherent
emptiness – it is nothing “positive”. It becomes downright “negative” or even “evil” when it is
summoned to explain a direct result in the realm of social status. Like when a robber says he was shot in
the back just because he was of a particular color, with no evidence that the shooter particularly hates
his color enough to unjustly kill him for it. It’s similar to when an attractive female is criticized for being
stupid and having only “slept her way” to her career or academic position. Racial unity is better left
unspoken of in the presence of another race, because it derives from a realm of human experience that
is too spiritual, irrational, and sensational for discussion. It’s like bragging about psychedelic experiences
to a person who is determined never to touch psychedelics. Of course race should not be dismissed as
“not beautiful”. But proclaiming racial pride to a member of another race, directly, is like telling another
man’s wife what you think toward your own wife – the energy is exerted in an inappropriate direction.
Proclaiming this pride to other members of the same race is like, between married man and wife, a
convenient method of expressing: “I love you, I love life, and I love your existence in life!” It is a special
sense of camaraderie. Of course, the most intellectual NatSoc can sufficiently objectify and externalize
the type of love he has witnessed for his own race to gain aesthetic appreciation to an extreme degree
when he sees a group of Black Nationalists celebrating their heritage. The fulfillment of knowing that the
highest possible religious experience has successfully transferred to a race other than yours is enough to
make a real NatSoc cry.

A SENSE OF HONOR

My personal sense of honor promotes a focus on fulfillment of a duty which never really ends,
primarily characterized by finding reasons to be happy or reasons not to be sad. I can’t really help but
continue this constant seeking, and only briefly stop to rejoice when I’ve formulated an intelligible
concept regarding such seeking. I instinctually descend back into contemplation to seek more concepts
to deliver to people of all races and cultures for certain reasons, people of my own race for slightly
different reasons, and females like my mother and potential mates for other reasons. I only do this to
feel good so that I know it will feel good for other people – this is according to my recognition that
basics and fundamentals of emotions and logic are “objective” or shared between me and anyone who
thinks similarly to me, and I consider my personality structure to be designed ultimately “objectively”
because I long ago planned to build my own soul in a straight-forward, simple way so better to relate my
internal observations to those of other people to ease the process of predicting other peoples’ desires.
When something makes me happy, it’s usually because I know it will make other people happy. But I
certainly was not innocent in my life scheme. Regarding potential mates, I want to lure them into my
own gratification by causing their happiness in as profound a way as possible, because my racial
aesthetic values reflect upon my physical appearance in a less-than-confident manner. My racial desires
do not match up and agree with my self-conscious nature. I want to satisfy my mother regarding my
well-being as payback for “making me white”, so I think hard about reasons to be happy – indeed, she
improved my chances of scoring extremely attractive white girls I physically love so much. With other
white males (and all races to some extent) I want to practice delivering happy concepts because their
acquaintance may lead to exposure to attractive white females. The way my mind works, for the rest of
my life, is extraordinarily influenced by my race, and is therefore “racist” to the utmost degree. I
consider this not “negative” in any way, and improvements to my mental health, as with many other
white males, would very likely result form inhabiting an all-white nation or ethnostate.

GNOSTIC PROPHETICS

I have accidentally become a Gnostic prophet of sorts in my capacity to unite Terence

McKenna’s teachings with those of National Socialism, and I’ll try to outline this capacity quickly. The
Gnostic Jesus evolves over time, or, more precisely, according to developments of the Zionist Jewish
Menace. I will use brute force here to establish that the 1970 outlawing of DMT was precisely a
development of Zionism, and the Gnostic Jesus has required a prophet since this development and I will
rest on the accomplishments of my predecessors by fulfilling prophecy with little more than the flick of a
wrist by writing a simple equation that hundreds of thousands should recognize as convenient and
elegant. The Temple of the True Inner Light correctly observes that the Eucharist for communion with
Christ is DPT, but they need the following for full historical accuracy: “The historical Jesus was Hitler and
the real embodiment of Hell is the psychological imprints of the Zionist Jewish conspiracy to commit
White Genocide.” Briefly: DPT is the fusion of Timothy Leary’s LSD and Terence McKenna’s DMT, and the
Temple of the True Inner Light recognizes the New Testament Jesus as referring directly to DPT. The
Zionist Jews don’t want you to acknowledge the afterlife with DMT or the supremacy of Jesus and DPT,
because, to put it bluntly, the Zionist Jews are the “real Satan” so to speak, and are invested in creating
the real Hell by corrupting white minds in order to better serve their goal of causing whites to serve as
eternal slaves on Earth. Biology and chemistry have clashed with psychology and race to such an extent
that the result is a true fusion, between National Socialism and the Temple of the True Inner Light, that
illuminates the resurrection of Jesus and the constant repetition of his story in a metaphor that equates
Jesus to literally be DPT and without asking Jesus into one’s heart by breaking Zionist law by consuming
Ayahuasca, the inevitable result of death is eternal confusion or rebirth into this dimension which is
destined to become a Satanic Zionist-controlled Hell. There are two methods that are not mutually
exclusive, to explain bluntly the paths of achieving access to Heaven: fight for your individual soul by
breaking out of the cycle of reincarnation (DMT) and/or fight for your race (black and white both!) by
“hailing Hitler” and removing Zionist Jews permanently from your nation.

INHERENT COMMUNIST PATH OF AMERICA

Some of the brightest, most successful, high energy individuals disgust me with their flippant
scoffing in response to my assertion that America is not only filled with communists, but its structure is
inherently communist and will lead to a Holodomor, if we don’t institutionalize fascism quickly. I am
extremely bothered by the way these “conservatives” think that just because we don’t see food lines
around every corner and other stereotypically “communist” features in America like we do in Venezuela,
everything is going to be alright and all worries about communism are simply silly. I’ve even heard a
“conservative” business owner make the outrageous arrogant statement that government regulations
being increased and employer responsibilities getting out of control won’t matter anyway, because he
will just “hire wetbacks” so everything will be fine on his end, and apparently be damned anyone who
doesn’t own a business and isn’t willing to break the law. “Conservatives” warn you against being fascist
and say “stop worrying about politics” – because indeed, to these people the suffering and genocide of
our culture is delegated to the lowly realm of “politics” – and they urge you to focus solely on getting a
job and want you to be proud and satisfied to be a rat in the rat race because “ideology won’t pay the
bills”. The communist liberals have a gun pointed at their heads and they only laugh, yet when you
propose kicking the communist liberals out, they get serious suddenly and, you can tell, images of
“American heroes” killing National Socialists flood their mind. They think that their parents’ generation
was somehow smarter and more courageous, so even though they don’t understand National Socialist
ideology, they feel that if Americans in World War 2 hated National Socialists, they might be unpatriotic
for not doing likewise. The reality is that liberals who support criminals and mobs of protesters are
infiltrating our government and the media is convincing people that Antifa and BLM mobs are heroes
and police should not stand up against them. This trend will continue until the mobs are pulling us out of
our cars, disrupting our places of business, and swarming college campuses to indoctrinate us or beat us
up for not demonstrating our renounced white privilege by offering our homes and bank passwords as
reparations for American historical slavery.

NATURE OF GOD

Everything important regarding the nature of “free will vs God” can be explained through the
very obvious principle/concept of “irreversibility” and its morphological effects on biology and culture.
Indeed, it is so obvious I feel slightly wrong for explaining it. The most general divine feature of this
dimension we inhabit is known intimately to heavy psychedelic users and can be crudely conveyed to
entheogenically-naïve people. All that’s necessary is to assert that the purpose of our dimension is to
“play with” given laws of physics as parameters of a “serious video game” in which the highest, most
general expression of God is the function of “space saving”. When atoms, DNA, objects, or body parts
move, that movement is “saved” by the inertia to “stay put”, and we see the “irreversibility” property of
this dimension by virtue of the fact that, across/through a lapse of time, the matter which has been
altered does not spontaneously “spring back” to its original “place”. The ultimate fulfillment of “destiny
or God’s will” is “biological space-saving and reproductive success”, where we have a community of
bodies (that produce more bodies) that serve as avatars for cooperative participation in this dimension
of creation. It will suffice to say that psychedelic people anticipate alternate dimensions that are
inhabitable after death and serve as “new sets of parameters to play with” upon rebirth. Waves of
culture and ideals of racial aesthetics are the crown jewels of God’s gift of spatial, energetic, and
biological irreversibility through time. As seriously as many assert that “money is the root of all evil”, I
declare that the tarnishing of our dimension’s divine crown jewels is solely the fault of Zionist multi-
generational Judaism. The existential surprise and “awe-at-perfection”, derived from meditating on the
accepted fact that dimensions like ours (and an afterlife) exist at all, is to be expected as readily as the
equally-astonishing fact that you, as an observer, also obviously exist. It seems that such grandiose, dual
spontaneity is the norm, suggesting that the mind-blowing “self” and “God” are to arrive in existence as
a co-mingling pair, as a matter of course and of “matching up”.

DEFINING GOD
 The desire to define God is a worthwhile pursuit that says a lot about the person espousing a
particular definition of God, and it is undertaken with a sense of urgency in the context of so many
people providing lackluster descriptions at best, and offensive perversions at worst. The context of the
question of the “existence of God” is usually so annoying and useless that I find it often attractive to call
myself atheist in the utility of repelling subhumans. In the interest of “ending the discussion”, I put on a
mask of atheism when I can’t be bothered to explain my Gnostic views, and I find it rather degenerate
when people claim abstract “belief in God” without having the intelligence and respect to describe what
God is. If I ask you to describe God, all I wish to ascertain is that you don’t blindly follow a demonic lie
called Jehovah that the Jews invented to dumb down the Goys through magical creation of everything
out of nothing for the highest purpose of being the “chosen race” of the “creator God”. Since you’re
reading my book, I will offer: I’m a very tired soul that would prefer eternal nothingness after death, but
out of curiosity I verified, by breaking human laws, that eternal life is real. There is no stereotypical God
in the sense of a single ruler of Heaven that is separate from your true egoless self, but the word “God”
may be redeemed and made useful. The afterlife actually makes more sense and is less mysterious than
this life, so an analysis of “the God of the living” is in order. Many organizations have the abstract, all-
inclusive idea of God as your own chosen definition of a power higher than yourself. That’s fine by me,
but I will exercise argument by framing energy as a force that exerts change upon matter, and my spirit
is made of energy that zaps through neuron wires, and in that sense, in God’s connection to energy
itself, I can confidently call myself God with an objective overtone. What we really want to say is that
“history is the theater of God’s becoming” and that we, as both individuals and parts of racial collectives,
are participating in the fulfillment of Earthly purpose. Here the Red Communist subhumanity brings God
to Earth with atheist-purposive-utopia. The same objectives of leftist decay are being carried out from
above and below, through the catholic political church values and communist international conspiracy,
respectively. My living God of history is biological through race, and historical through Nationality.
Nationalism is really a good substitute for religion in the sense that the God of people has provided
organization by race, culture, and language such that a good name for the units created by God in God’s
highest fulfillment of purposeful destiny may be called “nations”. We now have a useful definition of
God’s activity called Nationalism, and we already know too well that globalist, Zionist, international
conspirators are “enemies of God”.

FINDING JOBS

Why is it so hard to find jobs? Because of the Zionist nature of the government, starting with
mass theft by the Federal Reserve. The owners and especially managers are not liberated, to say the
least. The artificially high rent is making a living wage too hard to offer, especially without skill, which
requires too much investment of time to impart to workers who have no proven loyalty. Basically, as
hard as it is for unemployed people to earn rent money, it is probably harder for owners and managers
to make people productive enough to cover the expenses of doing business – expenses that are similarly
artificially high from the pressure instigated by high rent in general. The Zionist government props up
high rent prices by bailing out “too-big-to-fail” real estate companies in a communist scheme.
Conservatives generally have the right idea about economic stimulation from reducing taxes, and my
analogy for this mechanism is the way oxygen may be increased from plants by increasing carbon
dioxide to fuel their growth. Liberals concerned about welfare should recognize this analogy as overall
tax dollars will increase if we allow businesses to keep a higher percentage of their money because then
they will be allowed to invest properly for more workers and higher profits. With these higher profits,
the lower tax percentage will yield more welfare money to appease liberals – if they could just
understand the virtue of reducing taxes to invest in businesses. In any case, the point is that jobs will be
easier to find with more free money to spend on employee wages. However, most conservatives still
don’t see the point in abolishing the Federal Reserve – to end the theft of 90% of our wealth. Even
further, if we instituted anti-Zionist fascism, we would see that the Federal Reserve was a Zionist scam
all along, as it would then be promptly disposed of. The lie that National Socialists killed 6 million Jews
for being Jews was used to cover up the glory of Hitler’s accomplishment of creating 6 million jobs
quickly. This is a testament to the sometimes hard to believe fact that unemployment problems are
directly caused by Zionist activity.

FAUX ARRANGED MARRIAGE

The relationship between National Socialism and Anarcho-Capitalism is the same as that
between primer and colored paint – one establishes the necessary conditions for the other. It’s critical
to understanding AnCap to allow NatSoc ideas to flourish, unhindered, if people voluntarily wish them
to. It’s also critical to observe that the spirit of NatSoc, or at least some form of fascism, will allow for
more natural unfoldment of a functioning AnCap society. NatSoc and AnCap go together like peanut
butter and jelly. But we must be careful to describe NatSoc without unflattering rumors like genocide
and arbitrary world domination. I’m not blond and blue-eyed, but as an AnCap I will permit blond, blue-
eyed people their right to establish reasonable geographic areas where only blond, blue-eyed people
can live permanently or even at all, because everyone has the right to promote the ease with which
reproductively compatible mates may be naturally encountered and dated among an optimized size of
“simultaneous-dating-pool” for purposes of enhancing probabilities of finding a providential soul mate. I
genuinely believe God wants us to extend fascist mate-selection principles to our friends, family, and
offspring to render social life “more familial” in nature, i.e., to increase the chances of marriage between
offspring of friends, which would generally mean more long-term familiarity and closeness among multi-
generational social circles. This would tend to increase employment of and by family, which allows
quicker manifestation of developments of wealth and good material fortune. There should, of course, be
at least several quality nations in which all forms of racial mixing are permitted and encouraged, and any
serious NatSoc philosopher surely has no problem with this, but just as a black church should be allowed
every right to refuse my entry – blond, blue-eyed people should be allowed to refuse my entry to cities
or even reasonably-sized nations inhabited only by blond, blue-eyed people. We don’t consider it evil or
degrading to pitbulls when golden retriever breeders don’t allow pitbulls to enter their breeding
grounds, and maintaining selective breeding of humans is infinitely more important than that of dogs.
We must ridicule mercilessly anyone who seriously persists along the notion that NatSocs want to
exterminate other races – indeed, we must assume these people think Hitler was so stupid he didn’t
recognize Japan wasn’t white during World War 2. How do they explain the Japanese alliance in World
War 2? Perhaps these ignorant people think the Japanese had a death wish because they can point to
the well-known suicides of Kamikaze pilots or something. Of course we must admit the utility of a global
type of “socialism” that keeps all nations on Earth satisfactory enough to attract each race to “their own
nations”, and I concede I may be evil and backwards for thinking blue-eyed people are most trustworthy
as candidates for global custodians for detecting “human rights violations” among all foreign nations,
hence “master race”.

ANCAP AND NATSOC PB AND J

 When the lies about genocide and aspirations for arbitrary world domination are exposed, there
may still remain some skepticism about the German National Socialists’ style of government. Many
AnCaps who have not thought very long and hard about the true missions and methods of NatSoc, I
expect, will not understand the elegance of accepting extreme authoritarian institutions as a “means”
justified by the “ends” of obtaining real AnCap ideals in a real society. Beginners in AnCap philosophy
simply don’t grasp the beautiful simplicity of the idea that, perhaps, the quickest way to achieve true,
full anarchy, for the most people, worldwide, is to totally “let the NatSocs win” and “do their thing” to
the world and absolutely “believe them” when they say they have the most effective plans to end evil at
its source. That source is the state sponsorship of evil by globalist Zionism in the form of coexisting
Crony Capitalism, internationally cooperating with authoritarian communism. Maybe it would be useful
to suggest the use of the left-right model of the horseshoe, in which a departure from leftist
authoritarianism goes so far to the right that the right-wing begins using ironic methods of
authoritarianism to ironically establish anarchist right-wing principles with benevolent, righteous, and
swift ruthlessness. Maybe it would be useful to conjure images of Trump as an anarchist getting elected
to the most powerful position on Earth to assume the “most authoritarian office” ironically to achieve
the SLC Punk wisdom of “doing the most damage” to the system by joining the system and taking it
down from the inside. Maybe it would be useful to think of Hitler as a pirate captain taking command of
the Zionists’ battleship and steering it in an “anti-Zionist direction”, for lack of juicy imagery. When
there’s an evil system, you have to physically enter that system and take it apart intelligently – you can’t
just bomb it from the outside. As an anarchist you do not promote chaos! Anarchy is not chaos! Anarchy
is the destruction of arbitrary oppressive systems of unjustified rulership. The NatSocs call Hitler their
Leader because everyone who’s awake enough to realize what’s truly happening in his rise to power
gets goosebumps first of all, then salutes him and literally exalts him as “holy” upon realization that he’s
actually doing the job of the second coming of Christ – saving the world from blind authoritarianism
ultimately stemming from Zionist domination. When the world has gone along with blind schemes of
arbitrary dystopian authoritarianism for so long, it creates a complicated authoritarian machine which
can only be destroyed by entering its innards and commandeering the system, ironically systematically,
such that we say Trump is an anarchist using authoritarianism to defeat authoritarianism. It is an
advanced and profound theory of anarchy to assert that the quickest way to establish anarchy is to
ironically apply authoritarianism to dismantle the undesirable forms of authoritarianism that came
before. Those who bullied their way to evil ascent to power must be confronted by anti-bully bullies
who bully the bullies and thereby remove them from power. People who are very naïve sometimes like
to assert that you cannot fight violence with violence because “an eye for an eye makes the whole world
blind!” This is sheer insanity and stupidity, and we must swiftly reject this line of thinking as utterly
retarded. Indeed, as a NatSoc, I insist that the only way to permanently end racism is to use a temporary
form of racism which exports racists to their own nations where their racism can no longer be applied to
victims of another race because there is no other race within their borders! We must fight the
degenerate thinking that always insists “you can’t fight fire with fire”. When we have achieved the
appropriate intellectual maturity, we shall discover that the only way to fight racism effectively is to
intelligently apply racism itself, and the only way to end violence is to intelligently apply violence.
Indeed, it is ridiculous to argue that the method of ending a war must never include any use of violence.
In the same way, we must, as anarchists, assume the positions of authoritarianism if we want to end
arbitrary authoritarianism. Hitler was lied about, and the reality is that he never did anything wrong –
now don’t accuse me of saying “there’s nothing wrong with killing Jews”… I won’t tolerate your putting
words in my mouth and your being a mass-media sheep! I’m saying Hitler never killed Jews for being
Jews! The real tragedy of World War 2 is that a fundamentally anarchist aristocracy assumed the power
of state in a benevolent revolution and jealous communist Zionists had to rain on their parade by
creating a hoax called the Holocaust. Aristocracy is fundamentally anarchist because everyone knows
who the real rulers are – they aren’t hiding behind plutocratic democracies using puppets with money-
bag-power – and the people can overthrow the king themselves if a “mad king” starts disrupting the
natural order of things. Indeed, we saw under Feudalism that any time a mad king came to power, his
own family murdered him to protect the family honor in the eyes of the people. Hitler created a
spontaneous aristocracy based on the merit of honor, and instead of citizenship as a gift of birth,
citizenship in National Socialist Germany was granted only upon proving personal achievements
displaying Nationalist honor. “Ask not what your Nation can do for you, ask what you can do for your
nation!”

CONCESSIONS ABOUT ANCAP PROGNOSIS

I must frame my fears of “globalism” aka “international capitalism” from the perspective of the
hypothetical success of a “libertarian” aka “Anarcho-Capitalist” revolution. I must concede a “global”
aspect to said revolution in considering that all states on Earth would rapidly end, in a collapsing-house-
of-cards style, upon apocalyptic recognition that the last hope for legitimacy of one state derives from
military spending in fear of domination by one or more of all other states. The only scaffolding I see
propping up states in general is made of fears of chaos in the transition of military weapons from
ownership by the public sector to the private sector. Since this is somewhat of a specter or strawman,
and because, after Trump, I can’t conceive of major wars, I will pretend this chaos is not a significant
barrier and proceed past it. My fears of globalism (against a libertarian revolution) are assuaged by my
faith in fascism and my understanding of National Socialism. My fear is of an international gang of
Zionist Jews convincing naïve right wingers to sell out to financial capital amassed through ill-gotten
means, i.e., outsourcing labor internationally at the expense of white jobs. I’m not too ashamed to admit
a part of me is a hardcore statist despite my passion for libertarianism. This part of me finds it necessary
to allow formation of new nations based on protecting a race/culture from the evils of financial capital
amassed internationally. My understanding of National Socialism is to redesign the state towards a
purpose of valuing “national honor” over capitalist libertarian principles, in the sense that a foreigner
can’t be permitted to straddle borders between states and set up shop in one state to market goods
from a different state simply to take advantage of a difference in economy and laws to make an easy
profit by artificial unfair competitive advantage. I’m not too ashamed to admit I’m a hardcore statist, if
my advocation of flexing state power will prevent my countrymen from selling out to Zionist globalist
Jews and immigrants, and giving up their honor for financial security. I expect any libertarian worth his
weight to declare that I am giving an unfair competitive advantage to businesses lucky enough to be
favored by a hardcore National Socialist state. To them I say my form of favoritism in economic planning
by an honor obsessed regime is far preferable to allowing the vacuum (of abstinence from economic
determinism) to be filled by connections created by an international gang of Zionist Jews! The power of
an honorable state should consist in converting money and approving trademarks between nations. I
hail Trump for his rhetoric about keeping jobs domestic!

LIMITATIONS OF LIBERTARIANISM

The big failure of the philosophy of Libertarianism/Anarcho-Capitalism, as I see it, is the way it
focuses on “European Realism of Carl Schmitt” from the point of view of “emphasis on the well-
organized elite” that take control of all political machinery, and they neglect the more serious lesson
about the “disorganized masses” who are taken advantage of. The masses are ideologically lazy or
politically unenergized and unappreciative of their cultural inheritance. I may be intellectually crucified
by AnCaps as a totalitarian for this, but: The masses are mostly “sheep” and can’t truly protect
themselves economically and culturally from “the wolves”, and they therefore need “protective wolves”.
The best “protective wolves” are National Socialists who agree with the economic principles of
Libertarianism, but do not feel that the general population is prepared to handle the implications of
absolute anarchy, and therefore seek to protect the masses in ways in which they mostly aren’t
intelligent enough to know they need protection. The masses are generally selfish and short-sighted and
would choose a lower price for a product rather than support the domestic contribution of ensuring that
the product was created by people who share their culture. When everyone is allowed to engage in
mass global trade, it encourages a lack of culture in which people “work overtime” in order to afford
their consumption of the cultural products of foreigners! National Socialism is an extreme form of
Nationalism which seeks the facilitation of cultural creativity by ending international capital transfers,
and equates this “true” non-imperial form of Nationalism with “true” Socialism in the sense that
“Socialism” should involve the subordination of superficial “freedom of the individual”, in its
unprincipled sense, to the greater good of the racial, ethnic, cultural collective. NatSocs maintain that
financial communism is not the correct method to achieve the “greater collective good” and do not seek
wealth distribution schemes from rich to poor in order to fulfill “Socialist goals”. NatSocs are not subject
to ordinary criticism of “socialist schemes” because they do not seek to “plan the economy centrally”.
NatSocs achieve “protection of collective culture” by enforcing boundaries to international trade so that
the people are not overworked in a vain effort to afford luxuries of foreign cultures (goods made by
another nation). Culture is “protected” by allowing people to be economically free from market
distortions created by artificial job distributions perturbed by international corporations and
outsourcing, etc. This economic freedom allows people to work less and not worry about too much
competition in daily jobs, but instead to enjoy domestic cultural creations, and perhaps themselves
contribute to such creation, and seek eternal and spiritual fulfillment instead of living in service of other
cultures and globalists. They are not to be considered mere “capitalists” because their aspirations
extend beyond “individual freedom”, and they prohibit import and export of ordinary capital, especially
gold. Without NatSocs, according to the lessons of Carl Schmitt, the masses will be too stupid for their
own good, if left on their own under anarchy. They need an organizing regime of NatSocs to initiate a
simultaneous wave of cooperative “anti-capitalist, profit-destroying fascism against other cultures and
types of people. They are incapable of assuming the responsibilities of fascism effectively, if left on their
own. They will recognize the pragmatic utility of being forcibly unified! They will give up their “liberties”
willingly to care-takers who are “politically incorrect” enough to do the “dirty work” of protecting their
own culture! AnCaps are important in theory, but NatSocs are the only reliable saviors of organic
culture, that inspires developments necessary to create the quality of life consistent with “heaven on
earth”! In defense of the historical National Socialists of 1930’s Germany, their ideas of socialist
institutions were limited to mass transport and police. They specifically argued that “socialist measures
should not intervene with private property”. Since no one did own the railways, they were faced with a
decision that they knew was rather arbitrary, and happened to go against the typical AnCap solution.
The decision was whether to give the property over to arbitrary private ownership. In their defense, the
public would have thought negatively of handing the property over to private ownership, and would
have thought they were “playing favorites”. Also, the Zionist stock market players and bankers might
well have performed “sabotage” on the private owners of the railways through “international financial
intrigue”, opening the NatSoc regime to a legal vulnerability and general headache. In any case, I believe
if the NatSocs had won World War 2, they would not be opposed to AnCap ideals of pure private
ownership of everything, especially because ethnically homogenous societies would be established.
Anyway, public finances could be and were so good without Zionist intrigue, that extra money could be
spent on helping out the poor easily, with no need to bother private citizens for help or waste any
money on government programs to provide for their railway transport or police services. The practicality
of waiting for many private owners to organize, among themselves, “who owned which parts of the
railways”, was probably not optimal. In any case, it’s not a big deal because they did their job effectively
under an honest NatSoc regime, and the economic miracles of the Deutschmark are notorious. The
regime under Hitler could have handed over police and mass transport to the private sector any time,
but they were not allowed to continue with their economic miracles due to the Holocaust hoax. Private
police of all sorts were obviously permitted, but I’m sure the emphasis of public police was to facilitate
protection for poor people and to selectively enforce laws in courts that were favorable to the
controversial race-related policies of the radical regime that had just taken over the government. It is
extremely important to note that profitable private police and transportation were available, and that
profit wasn’t the goal in providing the public versions, and that the economy was not significantly said to
have been “planned” communistically via mere police and transportation services.

THE STATE AS ULTIMATE JUDGESHIP MONOPOLIST

The state as monopoly of ultimate judgment must be critiqued in its justifications for choosing
allocations of taxes (aka “stolen loot”). Most conservatives can be 99% convinced of the idea that all this
“choosing” could be done better and more cheaply by a hypothetical free market (which has never
existed yet) which is a condition of Anarcho-Capitalism. But these same conservatives lose their minds if
you suggest the military could be funded privately. Thus I conclude the major barrier, in the
philosophical shift from the state to a private law society ran by AnCaps, is conceptualizing military
funding under AnCap conditions. After all, won’t the evil people who took advantage of “the people”,
through the state, be richest and therefore most capable of commandeering the military equipment and
paying soldiers to do their bidding? I declare that this is unresolvable only to people who do not
embrace the “advanced boycott” methods of ruthless but benevolent fascism. Blacks who complain,
“white military campaigns slaughter black pawns” and whites who recognize “world wars and
revolutions have been masterminded by Zionist Jews to genocide whites in particular” will be satisfied
by moving to the protection of their respective ethnostates, where all racism that was intranational and
hidden is now international and exposed. With institutionalized fascism, the purchase of military
equipment by crazy evil people can be minimized and racial genocide will be internationally exposed to
give each ethnostate a fighting chance at preservation of their ethnicity. It will suffice to say that with
expulsion of Zionist Jews, 99% of these racial genocide campaigns and world war instigations shall be
eliminated – indeed “they” are the only “people” doing it. The “craziest” AnCap argument is in favor of
“recreational nukes” because the second amendment is for the people to own whatever equipment the
government has, and quickly now imagine non-whites attending universities in white nations to bring
knowledge of nuclear technology back to their homeland to genocide whites while the Jews (in bunkers)
neuter the white nation’s government into delay upon initiation of nuclear attack. Thus it is possible to
imagine the utility of private nuke ownership the same way robbers may kill you before the cops arrive if
you don’t own a gun.

TOWARD A BETTER DEFINITION OF SOCIALISM

The use of the word “socialism” in the term “National Socialism” has been a source of much confusion. It
is very wrong to assert that Hitler inserted the word “socialism” into his ideology in an attempt to attract
leftists and swindle them, and it’s also wrong to say the inclusion of this word indicates any kind of
leftism. Here’s the real idea: the term “National Socialism” is like putting an “equals sign” between the
words “Nationalist” and “socialist” and to present the very new and enlightened idea that true
Nationalists have a truly socialist purpose, and true socialists must have a true nationalist purpose. This
new Nationalist type of socialism is essentially meant to protect a culture or race from the degenerate
form of “socialism” which is called “communism” or more precisely, a more accurate term, or another
name for “communism” is “democratic socialism.” “Democratic socialism”, aka “communism” is anti-
Nationalist by virtue of a predatory endeavor to entice the lower-class of one nation to join a coalition
with the lower-class of other nations to join forces and steal the private property of the upper-classes of
every nation worldwide. This spirit is the opposite of the spirit of “National Socialism”, which declares
that all classes are necessary parts of an organic “Nation” which should naturally experience a
“Nationalist unity” by virtue of shared race, culture, and/or language. But there is a very important
aspect of “National Socialism” which has a truly socialist aim of “protecting society”, including the lower-
class and upper-class, from the negative effects of international capitalism aka globalism. It may be said
that the “socialist aims” of National Socialism come from a desire to protect all classes from the class
warfare that arises from above and below through international conspiracies and globalist capitalism.
There’s a huge difference between the kind of “socialist policies” that arise from National Socialism and
that of “democratic socialism” aka communism. Communist socialism aims to give upper-class wealth to
the lower-class in exchange for votes or other forms of political loyalty/support, for example, “free
housing for all” or “universal healthcare”. On the other hand, National Socialism uses “socialist power”
of state government primarily with an attitude of “blocking” those forms of social institutions which are
unhealthy for society and would do harm to lower-and/or-upper-classes. The biggest socialist goal of
National Socialism is to plan geographic spatial arrangement of races, cultures, classes, and industries in
a way that optimizes National culture by virtue of decentralization. The spirit of this primarily involves
the prevention of crowded cities - which serve the interests of political aims of communism by virtue of
“class awareness” and democratic values. Indeed we all know intuitively that the big cities are the
bastions of the Democrat parties and the breeding grounds of communism where subhuman
chimpanzees bully each other into leftism like Austin, TX does. National Socialism is revealed as a primer
for the colored paint of Anarcho-Capitalism when we understand that forceful blocking of the location of
cotton mills, for example, in urban centers geographically distant from the cotton farmland source of
raw cotton products such that building of cotton mills far away from cotton production is blocked, serves
and economy-boosting purpose that protects all lower-class people from high prices derived from
excess shipping cost of raw goods relocation, and similarly protects upper-class people from
international communist rage of the lower-class derived from harsh struggling conditions of every day
cost of every day goods making every day life too difficult to tolerate in comfort. “Nationalists” who like
international war in the sense of “patriotism” which asserts “national values” on other nations are not
National Socialists, and these “nationalists” are simply using “patriotism” to hide their disgusting,
degenerate support of Zionist international Judaism as a form of unchecked global capitalism. Global
capitalism is not National Socialist or Anarcho-Capitalist, it is Jewish Zionism!
UNIVERSAL BASIC INCOME

The idea of implementing basic income (everyone earns enough money “to survive”) is a
slippery slope towards communism (full “central control” of all industry in the economy) and it would
best be saved for implementation under “anarchist conditions” in which the state has been abolished.
Basically, if the government were the one to implement basic income, the calculation of dollar-
devaluation-by-inflation would inevitably become “public knowledge”, because the state would have to
release, as public information, the details of its actions. These actions would need to be about money-
printing, because, presumably, the basic income advocate would not want to fund the distribution using
taxed dollars, otherwise we invite an old argument about decreased economic production in a
downward spiral involving ever-increasing tax percentages to make up for decreased profits which are
taxable, in a vicious cycle. So now the argument shifts to the topic of “public awareness of inflation-
adjustment”. We would need an “oligarchy bureaucracy”, or basically communism, to deal with
instances of owners/managers adjusting prices to account for impact in demand (basic income). This is
because it’s too hard to conceive of a group of radicals encouraging cops to let them “get away with
murder” as they spontaneously kill people who engage in price-adjustment in response to the inflation.
These would-be killers would need to “get permission” from an authority system of “oligarchic
bureaucrats” who say “I know it when I see it” and agree that, yes, your murder victim is doing “it” and
deserves to die. The only way universal basic income could work is if it is privately forthcoming from
someone like George Soros. Under anarchy, everyone would realize that no more welfare is
forthcoming. Then the feminist capacity of humans would attract a voluntary donation system. Donating
to poor people’s welfare would be rewarded with recognition via advertising. People would compel
other people to give as much as they can because the government bureaucracy is no longer around to
take care of the problem for them and also waste (or steal) 70% of it. This would evolve into the
anarchist form of universal basic income, contingent on returned productivity for receiving charitable
services and/or advertisement/exposure services rendered by the recipient of the “universal basic
welfare”.

THE HELL MYTH

It is not sufficiently transformative for the psyche to simply hear from even a hundred trusted
personalities that Hell is not real and may have even been invented to scare you and make you more
easily manipulated and susceptible to “spiritual” or “religious” doctrines or propaganda. Hell has a vast
mysterious quality that owes its nefarious nature to the question “What if?” It is not enough to simply
hear the shouted words that belief in Hell is ridiculous, because a clever mind endlessly appeals to its
popularity in order to grant it even remotest plausibility which grows upon inspection to infectious,
mind-paralyzing proportions. Even a heavy ayahuasca user who has already seen the inevitable Heaven
that awaits in the afterlife can always return upon quick contemplation into doubt by virtue of the
simple “What if?” that asks whether Hell may await chronologically behind any wonderful experience.
Indeed, thousands of angel-alien-ancestor-gods may demonstrate through miracles and telepathy that
all thoughts of anything “bad” have absolutely no eternal legitimacy, and still the recipient of these
demonstrations can hypothetically theorize that something remains uncertain, and the magnification of
this improbable logic through contemplation can partially consume one. The only thing robust enough
to deliver continuous waves of therapeutic doubt-negation is the undeniable comedic catharsis of a
truth that makes all too much sense. We need to blame it all on the Jews! Only that will feel good by
virtue of its sincere correctness. The Etruscans were a backwards people obsessed with torturing
victims, and the Jews, seeking to include their degenerate culture values into the Roman Empire, gave
exercise of their obsessions in the aesthetic artistic conceptions of Hell that served the later purpose of
mind-control and need of savior. In short, Hell was delivered to whites through the Jews! This is
cathartic to an aesthetic National Socialist because it dismisses any burdens of inheritance! I don’t need
to stunt my growth with the weight of this concept of Hell because it is not a racial artifact of my people
– it belongs to foreigners! My ancestors will not guilt-trip me into solidarity with their unfortunate
contemplations of Hell when I join them in the afterlife, indeed they will salute me for spiting Hell
categorically as a hideous leftist monstrosity! But there’s not much time for celebrating before the
graduate course of Shamanism instructs us that the masses shall experience Hell by virtue of thinking
that Hell is a possibility. When the masses see angels they may get confused and call them demons. So
the Jews basically really are making Hell real and they actively send our people there.

HUMANIST PACIFISM AS MISTAKE

Pacifism should not be promoted as a virtue, especially as it concerns racism and libelous
accusations of others being racist, substantiated by nothing other than being white. We are confronting
an age where it shall become more and more popular to assume guilt of racism on the part of a person
simply because they’re white, especially if they “behave like a white person”. This mechanism shall be
justified, by an appeal to assumed-family-inheritance of racist attitudes, in the sense that someone has
“probably learned to be racist from their parents”. It will also be popular to insist that someone is racist
if they have not chosen to race-mix. So, in one or two generations, the tendency to be called racist will
dramatically increase if you are still white, because being white is hard evidence that your parents were
both racist by virtue of choosing not to race-mix! If your parents are surely racist, it is a safe assumption
that you yourself are racist! Furthermore, if you don’t prove at all times that you’re truly not a racist by
dating a non-white person, you will be guaranteed to be racist for not race-mixing! In a generation or
two, it will be practically forbidden to date a white person if you are white. Otherwise you will be beaten
up for being a racist! This is called “white genocide”!

MECHANICS OF RACISM

The general understanding of the mechanics of prolonging vs ending racism tends to be at least
abysmal, if not entirely backwards. It is clear that racism is such a “touchy” subject that practically no
one treats it with calm rationale, but instead yields to a “knee-jerk reaction”. If we can reduce the taboo
on the subject, we will see more clearly how to confront and contain it. If we endeavor to suppress all
instances of “apparent racism”, we may indeed achieve the opposite of our intended effect. We may
only exacerbate and prolong racism and, indeed, make it harder to detect, by burying it deep inside
those with racist tendencies. It’s not good to make it forbidden to talk about racism, and it serves the
purposes of minimizing the effects of racism to encourage racist people to be honest and open about
their identity as a racist person. When we identify those who are racist, it makes it infinitely easier to
avoid them! When we shove racism in the closet by forbidding people to be racist, we render it
impossible to identify and reveal racist people! If we create an all-white nation, we can export racists
there! If we “make it cool” to be racist, we truly ascertain that those who say “I’m not racist” truly are
not racist!

INTERNET ADVOCACY

Stupid, pathetic “traditionalists” talk bad about the internet in a vain attempt to ennoble the
idleness of their childhood and technology-free forms of “recreation”. I believe a profound sadness is
exposing itself for attention, along with an authoritarian control-freak impulse to maintain a sense of
superiority and ultimately “mind-control” over ostensibly uncontrollable or improperly understood
paths of “mind evolution”, when these detestable people postulate adverse health effects as a result of
children using the internet. The internet must be hailed as an unexpected development threatening to
thwart globalist, communist, leftist, Zionist plans for world domination. We can now instantly live-chat
with all foreigners to keep tabs on politics, economics, and war instead of relying on mass-media-
middlemen to evaluate foreign worldviews for us. Before the internet, we were merely relying on
American LSD consumption, alone, to “humanize the enemy” in the wars engineered for us by the
Zionists. Now, it would appear, the last obstacle to “humanizing enemies” is allowing soldiers to use
smartphone internet to Facebook the foreigners using built-in translators. This is probably the seed
which will grow into the wild advent of complete worldwide demilitarization. The erosion of economic
opportunities and failure of white families to resist dysfunction associated with statist complications has
probably not progressed sufficiently to preclude the novelty of youthful entrepreneurship in
“journalism” necessary to create a free-market alternative media aimed at comparison of mass-media
impressions of foreign situations with direct Facebooking endeavors. The liberal Democrat dream of
worldwide demilitarization would be impossible without Facebook, but now the problems associated
with shutting down one state while other states still exist will probably be made trivial to solve when the
AnCaps and NatSocs demolish all statists worldwide through political debates. Such is getting so
advanced that all statist rhetoric will be easily defeated, topic-by-topic, and every single argument will
be answered, with a hilarious meme making a mockery of the liberal, communist, or anti-fascist
opponent. All politicians and intellectuals will be required to debate anonymous Kekistanis in order to
be taken seriously by internet users. Obstinate avoidance of the internet to appeal to the mind’s
conception of female attraction will be exposed as the empty vanity it truly is. The pure mind shall
triumph over the ego! My vision of the future includes much recreational time spent perfecting ideology
in the never-ending crusade against the Left, idealized in the production and curation of memes. Part of
this should certainly include finding Facebook friends from other nations and converting them into
AnCaps or NatSocs so that the seeds of truth may spread organically from the bottom up. After all, what
is there to discuss with a foreigner besides his position in the war against globalist states? I certainly
don’t care about his favorite foods and clothes. If all AnCaps and NatSocs engage in this form of “pen-
palling”, then the Facebook “friends” number limit won’t be a problem in spreading truth across the
globe. It is merely an issue of “minor self-sacrifice” for a white person to spend any effort finding non-
white foreigners, and this missionary endeavor isn’t all-important in the short-term, because in the
short-term, Kekistanis are busy enough ironing out debate responses to the Leftists and converting
Americans and Europeans. After we take over America and Europe, we can easily organize the
assignment of “non-white pen-pals” to personally convert using built-in Facebook translation. Then it
will be a trivial task indeed to organize a worldwide formal protest against all states to get the attention
of stragglers who still haven’t grasped the providence aspect of the internet in saving the world. After
saving the world, each race will be able to communicate with every other race directly through
Facebook even if they belong to separate ethnostates and cannot physically meet eachother unless they
go to a proper “race-mixing state”. This way, we will continue saving the world for each race along the
natural and obvious assumption that the next “generation of white males” would prefer to see “only
whites” when they go to stores, restaurants, clubs, etc. and only interact with non-whites on Facebook
during “recreational world-saving time”.
PSYCHEDELICS VS THE STATE

The acceptance of social institutions of liberal humanitarianism by scientific experts or

professionals under a regime of authoritarianism has allowed the state to gain powers that are
especially scary to psychedelic users. Long story short: “bad trips” always come from revelations that life
itself has become a bad trip under state tyranny, and the root of psychedelic paranoia is the fear of
being caught doing something illegal. The complications of suddenly, spontaneously, becoming more
“intuitively empathetic” or “socially smarter” or “spiritually enlightened” grant psychedelics a propensity
to cause short-term odd behavior as a reaction to the perception that something very wrong is
occurring. Especially to a conspiracy theorist, the boundary-dissolving effect of the psychedelic renders
spectrum-positioning between self and society, or subjective and objective, severely blurred, having
profound implications on placement of guilt and requisite vigilantism for various categories of global
imperfections or conspiracies. Especially with the mystery of government UFO technology, the
implications for a suddenly, spontaneously, exaggerated imagination may cast doubt as to what extent
the NSA spying program may surveil you personally, and mistaken recognitions and validations of
suspicions in the external environment and other humans can unexpectedly generate an intense
conviction that personal action is demanded of oneself to avoid unlimited (to the imagination) negative
consequences. The creepiness of the seriousness of other people’s behavior toward religion may
combine, as it did with me many times, with the state power of religion, to convince one, under
psychedelic influence, that a profound darkness underlies various emanations of state authority, and
this pent-up, cumulative question of weird religious behaviors constantly observed throughout life may
compel one towards dramatic performances of violations of social institutions as affirmation of aversion
to unknown mysteries of dark conspiracies. Dramatic delivery of spontaneous psychedelic outburst is
encouraged by the heaviness of society’s emphasis on Christ’s crucifixion torture, especially against the
background of common participation in wars. The idea that “freedom isn’t free” grants a serious and
desperate flavor to compulsions. The boundary-dissolving psychedelic effect is heavily associated with
communist social ideations like solidarity with victims of torture, and I believe this is correlated with the
disturbing history of flagellation and castrato’s – by virtue of the proposition that “if one must do
something, another must also”. This inversion of “an eye for an eye” derives from common contempt for
physical privileges of some which may be denied to others. The liberals have expanded authority of the
state in matters of mental health, and a common conception mistakes short-term psychosis, created by
psychedelic spiritual stimulus, for a serious long-term problem. Basically the argument goes: This person
must be handled by government-sponsored authorities for his own good because he may eventually
commit a crime against himself or others, hence pre-emptive action. Mental illness is created or
exacerbated by institutionalization for many reasons, but for me personally, the root of complications
derived from the idea of now being “put on a list”. Against the background of expanded incarceration as
a result of the 1970’s LSD era and the recent “war on drugs”, the imagination may mix with hypothetical
UFO capability to create the fear that supremely powerful and evil authorities now have one “on a list”
and the nature of, and implications of being on, such a list evolve the familiar feeling of “being in
trouble” into a devastating monstrosity of life-or-death gravity. “If you don’t rebel against authority of
the most common sense by removing your clothes in public, NOW, all military casualties are your fault
according to the imminent neo-communist regime which is the Anthropomorphic Freemasonic God”.
Such is the National Socialist mind on heavy doses of psychedelics.
ABOVE POLITICAL CHART EXPLAINED

“Left-right/Capitalist-Communist/Anarchist-Authoritarian Chart”

At the bottom-left corner of the chart, we see the warning “Here be Dragons”. This refers to the
“evil trolls” who spread the ideology that it is somehow possible to simultaneously be leftist and
libertarian, anarchist and communist (AnCom), or Democratic Socialist and Libertarian. In fact, it is an
oxymoron to say “leftist anarchist” because liberty and leftism are mutually exclusive. They might be
stupid or trying to trick you.

At the top-left corner of the chart we see arrows pointing to the letter C which indicate the
reality that any typical leftist, by virtue of legitimizing the “left-direction”, is inevitably, in reality, a
supporter of the gradual or rapid evolution of absolute authoritarian communism, where an extremely
small group of dictators exercise absolute control of their planned economy, in the name of helping the
poor masses become equal, in economic-performance-outcomes and results, to the upper class. Here
there is no innocence, and indeed we must physically remove leftists like a cancerous growth. This is the
notorious domain of globalists. Any concession to statist, leftist principles shall “snowball” in the sense
that economic deterioration becomes the reason for further statist, globalist, leftist intervention which,
in a vicious cycle, creates more economic deterioration to legitimize more statist intervention, and so
on, ad infinitum.

At the bottom-right we have people who believe in “real capitalism”, and they understand that
most types of statism or authoritarianism disrupt the free market, and therefore make “real capitalism”
impossible. My favorite personalities in this corner of the chart are Ron Paul, Bastiat, Murray Rothbard,
and Hans-Hermann Hoppe. This sector belongs to the “classical liberals” and Founding Fathers of
America. The letter A refers to Anarcho-Capitalists who firmly believe that everything good that has ever
been done by the “state or government” could be done, more efficiently and at lower cost, using the
free market and voluntary contracts between consenting individuals.

The top-right corner is the domain of typical conservatives and Trumpistas. These people are
repelled by terms like “Socialism”, communists, and Marxists. The letter B refers to National Socialists
who are conscious of the need to physically remove the communists and, in such a spirit, embrace the
principles of fascism.

At the far-right we see my ideology labeled by the letter D represented by a wormhole that
connects A and B. The purpose of my book is to legitimize the connection between National Socialists
and Libertarians, to say that the goals of one are achieved by the success of the other, and vice versa.

TRUE ATHEISM

Stereotypical church people who are overly concerned with behavioral conformity are truly the
“atheist” ones because they neglect to respect opinion. Opinion is identical to belief and “atheism” is
lack of belief. These types are wont to proclaim, “It’s not about what you think, all that matters is what
you do.” They are thus simple-minded and should be spited as such in their basic materialist
understanding. They must learn that “thoughts” are “what you do” on the level of energy coursing
through neurons, as opposed to “what you do” physically as a simple meat puppet. Being a simple meat
puppet is not enlightened behavior.

APOLITICAL PEOPLE AS ANTISOCIAL

Apolitical people overly engaged in labeling and collecting “friends” are truly the antisocial and
selfish ones. Autistic fascists are, on the other hand, genuinely concerned with collective social
compatibility, community development, and unleashing the potential of unlimited “anonymous
friendship” between people among the masses.

WINNING FRIENDS

People declaring “you need friends” are telling you to go busy yourself with “reading body
language” and trying to procreate instead of addressing the forms of slavery that are making it unwise
to procreate. They assert that “ignorance is bliss” and “misery loves company”.

LOSERS

I want to know ASAP if you are still immature enough to have any conception of what a “nerd”
or “loser” may objectively be. Are these legitimate terms in your vocabulary? If so, I am invested in
avoiding you in the long-term.

ANONYMOUS RAVERS

I want to practice delivering propaganda that will transform anonymous raver acquaintances
into useful comrades, promoting effective “elevator speeches” that shall repel “communist zombies”
and attract “intelligent anarchists”. Facebook allows me to hone such skills at my cost-free leisure.
People who don’t appreciate a great meme were never capable of true friendship with me anyway.

TRANSPORTATION SCHEMES

Cars and roads are mostly a globalist conspiracy to sell oil to instigate “international relations”
to engender negotiations with foreign communists. It’s basic racism to assert that some races are “more
suited” to a particular job than others. I would like to avoid most forms of “colonialism”. AnCaps:
“Where we’re going, we don’t need roads.” Less than 1% of the population will eventually require
regular railway mobility. Gnostics are “space lichens” and material minimalists. Grocery stores and raves
should be in walking distance. Abolition of the Federal Reserve and Zionist Judaism will instantly create
$15 minimum wage and rent will be a fraction of what it is currently. Fascism will create appropriate
social trust ot enable location of labor within walking distance of living quarters.

ANCAP TRANSITION

When a true AnCap learns that communism is a product of Zionism, Zionism is impossible
without Judaism, and the Holocaust was a hoax, they instantly transform into National Socialists.

RIGHTS CONSIDERED

What are “rights”? Things government “gives” you? Or things government cannot take away
from you? “Gay Rights on homophobic property equate to Klansman robes in a black church. “Housing
Rights for all” is a Democratic Socialist ploy to deliver a cornered real estate market/housing bubble to
the “well-connected”, i.e., ultra-rich plutocrats with excess money to experiment with “government
relations.” Democratic Socialism is a trendy way to decorate communism and is more treacherous due
to its inherently deceptive plutocratic nature.

MY SPIRITUALITY

Spiritual pharmacology and entheogenic undertakings are appropriate for Far-Right philosophy,
in the interest of prioritizing the spiritual evolution of the species over the “rights of the individual”.
Personal enlightenment is justified inasmuch as personal psychedelic notetaking for non-selfish,
empathetic spreading to others is prioritized. This builds the community far more fully than communist
philosophy.

My Gnostic quest for enlightenment ended upon discovery of “The Eight Circuit Model of
Consciousness” by Timothy Leary and discovery of “The Temple of the True Inner Light” which is a
branch of the Native American Church located in New York.

The proverbial “third eye”, to put it quite simply, constitutes the difference between regular
waking imagination and visual dreaming during REM sleep.

The first 3 chakras or brain circuits flip up into the last 3 (1 2 and 3 flip up to 5 6 and 7) across
the 4th chakra using the 8th (out of body chakra) during the process of falling asleep. The 3 rd chakra fuels
the 5th chakra, the 2nd fuels the 6th, and the 1st fuels the 7th. Most people don’t have useful conceptions of
the top 3 chakras, so: (7) The Biosurvival chakra 1 is flipped up into the 7 th chakra during sleep by virtue
of “getting what you want” out of the dream or “succeeding” or “not being captured by the enemies”
found inside the dream, if any. (6) The self-to-environment-connection of chakra 2 is flipped up into the
6th chakra during sleep by virtue of emphasizing interactions between the body of your “self” during the
dream and the “physical” surroundings and external characters of the dream. (5) The “regular ego” of
chakra 3 is flipped up into chakra 5 during sleep by virtue of sensing your “character” and its motivations
and identity within each dream. This is perhaps the most difficult and trying aspect of any dream. Chakra
4 can be described as the emotional “heart” in approaching the struggles of life, and chakra 8 is the
same thing but found in dreams, involving being a kind of “hero” of a personal epic quest. (4 and 8)
Flipping chakra 4 into chakra 8 is the process of inverting chakra 1 into chakra 7, inverting chakra 2 into
chakra 6, and inverting chakra 3 into chakra 5.

The nature of life on Earth in its relation to the afterlife is the work of chakras 4 and 8 in
balancing the other chakras. The story of being a hero to yourself involves realizing that this is the only
Earth and this is the source of new people you will meet in the afterlife, and for an honest fascist, what
else may you talk about for eternity if not your contribution to the holy war, guided by Odinic Nationalist
leaders like Trump and Hitler? The qualify of the afterlife for a fascist individual is governed primarily by
the success of National Socialism over the evils of Zionism and globalism. We understand that the
continued production of souls that look and/or behave similarly to you, is worth protecting and fighting
for! We are looking down the barrel of a gun when we are alerted to the startling fact that only whites
are unable to point to a nation on the globe where they are the majority. It is not an “evil” trait to be
concerned about this fact!

REFUTATION OF PURE LIBERTARIAN RACIAL CONSIDERATIONS ON WELFARE

Just because politician whites or Jews are the ones who are signing legislation which enables
profiteering off blacks and refugees, doesn’t mean we can readily declare that whites are the cause of
abuse of government. After all, to be blunt, absence of blacks and refugees would nullify their designs,
granted this way of seeing the world. Richard Spencer is technically correct when he says that the
tyranny of socialism would likely become tolerable in a racially homogenous ethnostate because of
marriage-access to control of means of production given the utility of withholding sexual gratification in
blackmail arrangements targeting the rich in a benevolent sense. Heroic attractive women could change
the course of history by changing opinions of sons from that of their corrupt fathers.

REFUTATION OF THE IDEA THAT NATIONAL CAPITALISM/LIBERTARIANISM AS BEING PATH TOWARD

FASCIST CONTROL BY ELITE

Ron Paul: “you shouldn’t criticize capitalism because it’s never been tried before.” As a
monopoly on judgeship the auspices of a state categorically excluded the possibility of capitalism from
most of history, and enabled a modern communist conspiracy called corporatocracy, in which a free
market in currency production is inhibited by state sponsored FIAT currency monopoly. Capitalism is
impossible under FIAT currency law enforcement as a free market in currency production is the
necessary lifeblood for true capitalist exchange. In the Hoppean and Rothbardian view of anarcho-
capitalism, the ultra rich would truly be dependent on the masses for the following reasons:

1. Continued business transaction

2. Continued use of types of currency possessed by the ultra rich (see varying versions of bitcoin)
3. Voluntary cultural social inclusion
4. Adherence to private court rulings regarding tyrannical or dishonorable use of means of
production (see Rockefeller family attempt to “buy the entire landmass of Texas” and become
anarcho-dictator kings).
 The bottom line is that the ultra elite are almost entirely dependent on the veil of the “state
monopoly on ultimate conflict arbitration and use of violent force” to carry out their designs against the
global masses (see “open borders”, “legal tender FIAT currency production monopoly”, “state mandated
price controls granting soft version of theft by disabling voluntary spontaneous inflation for targeting of
ultra-rich customers seeking business transactions”, “mandatory vaccination in the spirit of having to
show your global citizenship papers and social security number, potential versions of the mark of the
beast 666”, and also “666 being three sixes aka esoteric expression of 6 three’s aka 3 sided geometry of
triangle aka 6 triangles aka star of David branding of goy cattle aka God’s chosen people imposing
Hebrew racial hegemony over masses of goyim”...

Too long didn’t read: Nationalism is anti-globalism, and globalism is New World Order
“supranationalist” control of masses by ultra-elite.

STATE MONOPOLY VS FREE MARKET

Economists circa 1880’s wholly declared that an ever-present law of economics had been shown
to exist in all times and places: namely, that under the auspices of a monopoly the quality of goods and
services rendered must always decrease and the cost of said goods and services must always also
simultaneously increase. The modern state shall be understood as an imposed monopoly demanding
monopolistic production of state-sponsored “legal tender FIAT currency”. As a free market in currency
production is the lifeblood of true capitalist exchange, it is manifestly a communist conspiracy to
promulgate the notion that under the auspices of the modern state we may describe the status quo as a
form of “capitalism”. The situation evolves to a scary predicament when globalists assert that “capitalist
exchange with foreign communistic/Chinese businesses” is to be labelled “free trade capitalism”
because in reality it is a pernicious version of “negotiating with terrorists” by virtue of stimulating and
supporting ultra rich elite globalist investors who establish foreign “businesses in China with excess
money from domestic countries in order to bribe government puppets in foreign countries to secure
“cost-plus contracts” to gain an unfair competitive advantage over a no-longer-free-market using funds
stolen from Chinese citizens using a tyrannical theft-based government regime.

EYE CONTACT CONSIDERATIONS

Of all people, Varg Vikernes had an interesting take on the institution of maintaining eye
contact, which I haven’t heard anywhere else, and which rings much more true than “autistic people are
shy.”

People with aspergers have a higher degree of empathy, and since the eyes are the “windows to
the soul”, if you have aspergers, then you regard eye-staring as intense and possibly invasive and rude,
almost like penetrating into people’s minds, so you would avoid looking people into the eyes at all times
because of courtesy considerations, not because of shyness. Just like how normies understand that it’s
rude and invasive to stand 2 inches away from a person if you’re talking to them, particularly if it’s a
stranger.

ISRAEL

Personally I’m logistically for Israel in theory, but if I could have it my way I’d make Israel bigger,
and maybe locate it in Africa or something, and tout it as a place for Jews to go and live separately from
those they call Goys. I don’t really care much, but I can appreciate the line of thinking that ostracism
would be seen as infinitely more human if a destination nation is predetermined. All in the name of
assuaging complications of sensationalized assumptions of genocidal motivation in ethnic nationalism.

TRUMP AS TRUE LIBERTARIAN

Trump is as libertarian as Ron Paul, at least. I know this because of the troops-pullout from the
Middle East and because RINO’s and Republican Warmongers criticize Trump for being worse than
Obama in foreign relations. He is better than a libertarian because he has the ability to expose the RINO
puppets infiltrating the Republican party on behalf of Democratic interests. Nationalism is truly
libertarianism in the context of being anti-globalist. Nationalism is secession from the globalist New
World Order promoted by the ilk of George Bush and son, Mitt Romney, John McCain, etc… Remember
the holy wisdom of Hans Hermann Hoppe: “smaller state geography is better by virtue of increased
exposure of plutocrats to the voting citizenry”... The logical progression out of the tyranny of democracy
is to reduce the area size geographically allocated to our #1 enemy, the state as territorial monopolist of
judgeship, use of violent force, legislation and sequestration of wealth aka taxation.

ROTHBARDIAN INSTRUCTION TO ALWAYS REDUCE TAXATION AND TRUMPISM CONFRONTATION

Rothbard explicitly and clearly instructs libertarians to never miss an opportunity to reduce the
financing of the state. I did not vote for Trump in 2016 because I believed he was an insincere RINO
plant working for Hillary Clinton to hand her the election. However, I’ve come to realize that the Trump-
supporters were onto something profound when they suggested that Trump cannot be a big
government puppet by virtue of having his own money-influx business. Therefore he cannot be bribed
by the elite money-masters. I will now vote for him in 2020 mainly because I’m a hardcore libertarian
who has noticed his success in reducing tax burdens and this is the most important successive
progressive goal of libertarianism: reduce the funding of monopolist state government by reducing taxes
to the greatest extent possible, no matter what the elitist media has in mind to program us into
believing.

COMMUNISM AS MONOPOLY OF MONOPOLIES

I understand communism as a monopoly over monopolies. Statist capitalism or cronyism or

corporatocracy or non-anarcho-capitalism is the mechanism used by democracy and socialism to
institute the end goal of communism which is delivery of the worker’s state to the elite globalist New
World Order oligarchs who intend to use manmade climate change and mandatory vaccinations to
institute global citizenship certificates to systematically genocide the 99% aka the Goyim.

STATIST POLLUTION

Rothbard clearly instructs us that the Hegelian Dialectic of proposed solutions to manmade
climate change were typical statist designs to engineer a delivery of power to the state in response to a
problem created by the state itself. Namely that problem created by the state was an outgrowth of the
state’s monopoly on the legal justice and court systems during the early industrial revolution of the late
1800’s. The judicial monopoly of the state claimed that in order to protect the lower cost of consumer
goods for the masses, it was a necessary sacrifice of the people that class-action lawsuits against inner-
city air pollution factors regarding lung health damages in large groups of humans, were to be
considered unlawful. The lung damage to groups of humans was ignored in favor of the profits of big
inner-city factories because of big money control of the state, with the public rationale of keeping costs
of consumer items low for the masses. If there had been no state during the early industrial revolution,
class action lawsuits regarding lung damage by air pollution would have inhibited profit gain by factories
too lazy and reluctant to design appropriate filters in smoke stacks, for example. The state manifestly
inhibited free market automatic solutions to the problem of pollution - by virtue of violation of human
rights to lung health by polluting factories. Using Hegelian Dialectic strategy, the state now designs an
inbuilt solution to the problem it created in the first place - in order to relegate exponentially more
power to the ruling elite through the mechanism of statist oppression of the 99% aka the Goyim.

DECRIMINALIZATION AND WELFARE

For reasons that should be obvious to anyone intelligent enough to have made it through
several paragraphs in this book - decriminalization of black market drugs across the nation would put
intolerable pressure on private property sequestration aka taxation mechanisms of the current welfare
state. This involves psychotherapy and disability as well as funding drug use under the auspices of price
gouging due to scarcity of willing chemists and legal repercussions of manufacturing and delivering
drugs. Please deign to work ideologically within the confines of foreseeable status quo parameters.
Looking at you, most libertarians…

CHARITY ROTHBARD AND RON PAUL

Ron Paul says “the great soul killing aspect of the state is that wealthy people will neglect to
take up responsibility for charitable efforts because the state has already relegated itself to that task”.
What I say is “the free market of charitable efforts will be similar to church offering plates where the
pastor says give what you can and thereby the church gains more for charity than if they had simply
mandated that every attendee give $3 which is what the state does and explains the continued plight of
poverty.” Also read Murray Rothbard in “The Libertarian Manifesto” where he describes the relative
supremacy of the Mormon church approach to almsgiving which aims at minimizing long term
dependency and equipping the impoverished with the tools needed to become independent financially.

PRICE AND VALUE IN AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS

Indeed price and value are proven to extremely often be unequal in all kinds of monetary
exchange for any good or service. Otherwise no transaction would be expected. For the purchaser, the
value of the good or service is higher than the price. For the salesman, the value is lower than the price.
Value then is NEVER objective but must always be subjective and susceptible to fluctuation between
different individuals as well as the same individuals at different times and in different situations.