Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
EKSPRESIONIZAM U NJEMAČKOJ
‘The Glass Pavilion’
Designed by Bruno
Taut (1880–1938)
Germany
1914, reconstruction
1992–3
MDF, brass, acrylic
and other materials
h. 70cm, diam. 74cm
Werkbundarchiv,
Museum der Dinge,
Berlin
The Glass Pavilion was commissioned by the glass industry for the 1914 Werkbund exhibition in Cologne. Bruno
Taut’s structure demonstrated the various ways glass could be used in a building, but also indicated how the
material might be used to orchestrate human emotions and assist in the construction of a spiritual utopia.
Taut’s interest in this aspect of glass (explored more intensively during the First World War and later in his book
Alpine Architecture and in the Glass Chain letters) had been stimulated by the writer Paul Scheerbart whom he
had met in 1912 and who argued for an earthly paradise
based on a new architecture of glass and colour. Subsequently, Scheerbart wrote Glasarchitektur (Glass
Architecture) in 1914, which he dedicated to Taut, while Taut produced his Glass Pavilion and inscribed
aphorisms from Scheerbart on the lintels of the 14 side walls.
The Pavilion structure was raised up on a concrete plinth, the entrance reached by two flights of steps (one on
either side of the building), which gave the pavilion a temple-like quality. The glazed walls were topped by a
dome of reinforced concrete ribs and a double skin of glass: reflecting glass on the outside and
colored prisms inside. In the interior, the colour effects produced by sunlight were enhanced by the reflections
of the pool and water cascade on the lower level, visible through a circular opening in the floor. Two flights of
glass steps enclosed with glass walls produced the sensation of descending to the lower level ‘as if through
sparkling water’. The cascade was made of yellow glass, while the pool was of its complementary colour, violet.
A mechanical kaleidoscope overhead projected images, an early version of a light show, intensifying the overall
impression on the visitor.
Erich Mendelsohn - Universum, UFA Kino, Cinema UFA, Berlin
The icon of German
expressionism is the Einstein
Tower in Potsdam, built for
Professor Albert Einstein, born in
Ulm, an astrophysical
observatory, 1919-21, designed
by the great German-Jewish
architect Erich Mendelsohn.
A student of the great Theodor Fischer, Häring took the view that each
building should be uniquely developed according to the specific demands
of the site and client. Few of Häring's designs were built but he was a
strong influence on his friend and colleague Hans Scharoun. One built
design was a contribution to the Siemensstadt housing project in Berlin
from 1929 through 1931, which was master-planned by Scharoun.
EKSPRESIONIZAM U HOLANDIJI –
AMSTERDAMSKA ŠKOLA
Michel de Klerk - Eigen Haard
Even though industrialization and urbanization were late in arriving in Holland, the 1901 Housing Act was passed in response to poor housing conditions and the
need for organized planning in a small country. The Housing Act provided financing arrangements and the creation of cooperative housing associations to build
housing. These housing "corporations" have been responsible for the commission of a large percentage of housing built in Holland in this century. One of these
corporations, "Eigen Haard" (Our Hearth) developed much of the workers' housing built in the Spaarndammerbuurt district west of central Amsterdam along the IJ
River. This area developed during the period 1915-1920 and includes several buildings by Michael De Klerk including "Het Schip" (The Ship) which is perhaps the
most famous of the Amsterdam School buildings. Het Schip is literally the flag ship of Amsterdam School building establishing De Klerk as the best known of the
Amsterdam School architects.
The Spaarndammer district consists of an irregular pattern of perimeter block buildings in an area between the main railroad tracks into the city from the west and
the docks along the river. De Klerk's first commission, his first real commission after over 20 years in the younger Cuyper's office, but one of three buildings he
designed around the park was for the building on one side of a central park in the neighborhood (Spaarndammerplantsoen). Built in 1913-1915 for a private client,
this block shows many of the characteristics of typical Amsterdam School buildings: brick, five stories tall, with a full facade on the top floor instead of a mansard
roof, and a distinct emphasis upon variations of materials and details. The other two buildings around the park were built for Eigen Haard. The first of these was on
the opposite side of the park from the first and reveals an even more developed Amsterdam style now with odd windows, turrets, stairs and entrances, was built in
1916.
The third project includes a whole block, the tip of which fronts the park. This was built between 1917-1920. An odd-shaped, irregular triangular perimeter slab
defines an small interior garden area. Dwellings have entrance from the street in point access system of repeating entrances and stairs and have balconies facing the
garden. The five story height of the previous Spaarndammer buildings is roughly followed, however, the block steps down to three floors at the East end where it
faces the park. A post office was designed for this end of the building and thus makes a public space facing a small paved plaza which is the extension of the park. A
turret at this end marks the entrance to the post office. A small entrance next to the turret leads to a small paved inner courtyard from which entrance is made to
several dwellings and which opens to small cottage like meeting room which sets as freestanding element at the end of the interior garden. The building steps up
from the post office end to the typical 5 story block. A strong horizontal emphasis is maintained with continuous faceted strip windows and continuous brick bands,
and other repetitive elements including the traditional attic lifts, and windows and entrances. At the west end of the block, the building steps back with a strange,
steeple like tower fronting a small paved plaza in a symmetrical organization axially aligned with Walenhamp's more traditional block across the street. On the north
side of the block, along Oostzaanstraat, a public school occupies two floor of the building making a formal interruption to the facade.
While the overall form and organization is an angular stepping ensemble, De Klerk applies many local symmetrical episodes at entrances, windows the western
tower, balconies and other applied elements. The resulting effect, within the context of this peculiar, vaguely expressionistic, Maritime mass is the impression of
repetitive order, a veneer or classical detail and a distinctly naturalistic, organic quality. The basic order of the block is one of repeating five story blocks organized
around a common stair.
The Amsterdam School housing was widely criticized because it was thought to be too luxurious for municipally-financed social housing. But, in actual fact, while
there are a lot of different apartment plans because of all of the peculiar intersections, and there are many dwellings which have unusual qualities, corner turrets,
balconies, or slightly unconventional plans, in reality these are quite minimal 2 and 3 bedroom dwellings with a small living room, kitchen and W.C.
The Amsterdam urban renewal program of 1968 began in the Spaarndammerbuurt when dilapidated buildings were removed, new buildings built. In the years since
most of the historic Amsterdam School social housing has been refurbished and today they appear to be in excellent condition having provided quality dwelling for
lower income citizens continuously for over 75 years. It is interesting to note that the construction of De Klerk's "ship" was exactly contemporary with the
emergence of the Functionalist movement and even though J.J.P. Oud's classic Functionalist housing experiment Kiefhoek was built five years later, Kiefhoek has
since been entirely removed and rebuilt.
De Dageraad Gebouw,
designed by Michel de Klerk &
Piet Kramer, is a striking
example of the Dutch
expressionism. A housing
project, ordered by a Socialist
co-operative society De
Dageraad (The Dawn),
included vast public spaces for
the dwellers of 294
apartments.
Built in 1920-1923
Video
FUTURIZAM, DE STIJL, SUPREMATIZAM
I KONSTRUKTIVIZAM
Futurizam, de stijl, suprematizam i konstruktivizam
FUTURIZAM
Giacomo Balla - Dynamism of a Dog on a Leash, 1912
Antonio Sant'Ella's "La Citta Nuova“,
1914
Futurizam, de stijl, suprematizam i konstruktivizam
DE STIJL I OUD
Red Blue Chair
Gerrit Rietveld (Dutch, 1888-1964)
SUPREMATIZAM
K.Malevich - Black Square (1913)
The Black Square of Kazimir Malevich is one of the most famous creations of Russian art in the last century. The first Black Square was painted in 1915
to become the turning point in the development of Russian avant-garde.
Black Square against white background became the symbol, the basic element in the system of the art of suprematism, the step into the new art. The
artist himself created several variants of the Black Square. All four Squares painted by Malevich from 1915 to the early 1930s developed the same
idea. Different are not only the sequence and year of creation, but also the color, design and texture. Malevich turned back to the Black Square every
time he needed to present his work in an assertive and significant way, often in connection with the most important exhibitions. However he always
created a new version rather than copied the previous one.
Malevich for the first time showed his Black Square (now at the Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow) at the Last Futurist Exhibition 0,10 in Petrograd in 1915.
A Black Square put against the sun appeared for the first time in the 1913 scenery designs for the Futurist opera Victory over the Sun.
The second Black Square was painted about 1923 with Kazimir Malevich's participation by his closest disciples, Anna Leporskaya, Konstantin
Rozhdestvensky and Nikolay Suyetin, for a triptych which also included Cross and Circle (now at the State Russian Museum in St. Petersburg). Being
one of the elementary forms, the square as a part of the triptych was no longer unique. Since the triptych embodied the idea of collective work which
was of great importance to Malevich, it is not as important by who exactly the idea was realized.
Some believe that the third Black Square (Tretyakov Gallery) was painted in 1929 for Malevich's one-man show, following request of Aleksey Fedorov-
Davydov, Assistant Director of the Gallery, because of the poor condition of the 1915 Square. This is the "blindest", most "hopeless" square, thickly
painted over black. It is as different from the first one, as Malevich's life and work were different compared to 1915.
One more Black Square, smallest and, probably, latest, touches upon the motif of red and black which was important to Malevich. It may have been
intended to make a diptych with the Red Square, though of smaller size, probably for the exhibition Artists of the RSFSR: 15 Years, held in Leningrad in
1932 which was to become the last important venue in the history of Russian avant-garde. The two Squares, Black and Red, were the centerpiece of
Malevich's exhibition in the show. This Black Square may have been a recapitulation when the artist worn by struggle and infirmity reproduced his
Victory over the Sun at a new stage. The last Square, despite the author's note "1913" on the reverse, is believed to have been created in the late
twenties or early thirties, for there are no earlier mentions of it. It was one of the few of Malevich's paintings which were not handed over by the
artist's heirs to the Russian Museum but were kept by his family. As legend goes, it was carried behind Malevich's coffin on the day when he was
buried. When the artist's widow Natalya Andreyevna Manchenko died, the last variant of the Black Square along with Malevich's Self-portrait and
Wife's Portrait passed to her relatives who later sold them to Incombank.
After the 1998 crisis this collection except the Black Square was offered for sale. The Culture Ministry of the Russian Federation used its privilege to
buy this precious work of art with the financial assistance of Vladimir Potanin, President of Interros Holding, and hand it over to the State Hermitage
Museum.
Futurizam, de stijl, suprematizam i konstruktivizam
KONSTRUKTIVIZAM
Vladimir Tatlin
BAUHAUS
Paul Klee: Twittering Machine, 1922
Mies' working and life partnership with Lilly Reich (1885-1947) became an important turning point in his life,
working together on the exhibition of the German Werkbund “The Dwelling” carried out in the form of the
housing estate Weissenhof in Stuttgart (1927). Here and once again at the Berlin fashion exhibition (1927), the
central theme of which was silk, Mies and Reich presented their concept of “flowing” or “unrestricted” space
which was further developed in the Barcelona pavilion (1928-29) and in the Brno Villa (1928-30). They also
both cooperated on the projects for the “brick” houses for Erich Wolf in Guben (1925-27) and Hermann Lange
and Josef Esters in Krefeld (1927-30). The Tugendhats were impressed by the house in Guben and strongly
influenced by Mies' personality. “He had a calm, self-confident certainty which immediately served to
convince you. From the manner in which he spoke about his projects, we realised that we were dealing with a
genuine artist. He said, for example, that the ideal dimensions of space cannot be calculated, space must be
felt.” Mies was the final director of the Bauhaus over the years 1930-33.
He left for the USA in the year 1938 where he took up the directorship of the the Illinois Institute of
Technology (IIT) in Chicago where he also established his own office. In the year 1940 he met Lora Marx, his
companion during his American years and obtained American citizenship in 1944. Mies worked on the plans
for the university grounds for IIT over the years 1939-58. He designed his most radical domestic design for
Edith Farnsworth in the form of a glass pavilion (1945-51). He realized the high-rise Lake Shore Drive
Apartments in Chicago (1948-51) and the administration skyscraper Seagram Building in New York (1954-58).
Mies designed the New National Gallery in Berlin back in his native Germany (1962-68). At the beginning of
the year 1969 Mies' Chicago office promised to assist in the restoration of Tugendhat Villa initiated by the
Brno architect František Kalivoda and Grete Tugendhat. Ludwig Mies van der Rohe passed away, however, on
the 17th of August 1969 in Chicago.
Mies' statement “less is more” is characterised by his pure forms and work with material. Glass, steel and
concrete are the attributes of his distinct “International Style” which has influenced architecture up to the
present day.
Tugendhat House
Brno, Czech Republic, 1928-30
Mies Van der Rohe
Barcelona Pavilion Building
The Barcelona Pavilion building is for many architects their favorite building in the
World. It's architecture is pure poetry, simple honest planes of stone with slim,
graceful polished steel cruciform columns. The integration of water through two
shallow pools brings calmness and reflection to the pavilion.
The architect Mies van der Rohe was interested in developing free flowing space and
this is done using walls as planes in isolation, joined by sliding elements or glass. Thus
the wall is expressed as a single element with space flowing around it. The majority of
the pavilion building is constructed out of (cream-coloured) travertine which gives the
building a luxurious feel and aids the perception of spaciousness.
Mies van der Rohe -
Seagram Building 1969
Mies van der Rohe - Sketch Seagram Plaza 1969
HEROJSKA IMENA MODERNE
ARHITEKTURE I DIZAJNA
Fagus Shoe Factory by Walter Gropius