Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
footnote continued
Chinese Law and Government, Vol. 20, No. 4 (Winter 1987–88), pp. 3–134; John P. Burns,
“Strengthening central CCP control of leadership selection: the 1990 nomenklatura,” The
China Quarterly, No. 138 (June 1994), pp. 458–491.
3. See “Zhonggong zhongyang guanyu guoyou qiye gaige he fazhan ruogan zhongda
wenti de jueding” (“The decision of the central Party on several major problems in reforming
and developing state-owned enterprises”) (22 September 1999) in Zhonggong zhongyang
wenxian yanjiushi (ed.), Shiwu da yilai zhongyao wenxian xuanbian (Selection of Important
Documents since the 15th National Party Congress) (Vol. 2) (Beijing: Renmin chubanshe,
2000), pp. 1002–35.
Cadre Personnel Management in China 705
Table 1: The 1990 and 1998 Chinese Communist Party Central Nomenklatura Compared
1990 1998
dent operation of SOEs. Some of these measures clearly trigger off the
changes as indicated in section six of the title list and section three of the
reported list.
In November 1998, the central Party decided to implement delinking,
that is, to sever the functional, financial, staffing and the use of official
status and name between enterprises and Party and state departments and
offices.10 For non-financial SOEs, there were two decisions to implement
delinking. First, personnel decisions of leaders of SOEs of fundamental
importance to China’s national security or economic livelihood are to be
controlled by the Party Central Large-scale Enterprise Work Committee
and handled by its executive arm, the Ministry of Personnel. The central
Party now controls 44 non-financial SOEs whilst the Party Central
Large-scale Enterprise Work Committee directly manages 120.11 Sec-
ondly, personnel decisions of other non-financial SOEs of secondary
importance to China’s economy should be as far as possible handled by
local Party committees (shudi guanli). This has affected approximately
600 to 700 of such SOEs.12 The crux of the problem of non-financial
SOEs is to determine the extent to which personnel as well as financial
authority can be partially off-loaded. The management framework under
this committee seems to call for more economic flexibility in the form of
partial delegation of personnel and financial authority to lower-level Party
organizations.
It is important to note that the central Party did not adopt a uniform
reform of SOEs across sectors. The management framework of the two
committees clearly exhibits the major contradiction in nomenklatura
policy. When tidying up the reporting line of financial SOEs, the central
Party aims to create a system-wide framework to strengthen its grip on
them. But because it takes the separation of state and enterprises as the
defining objective in reforming non-financial SOEs, the ownership and
management jurisdiction of SOEs of secondary importance can be off-
loaded downwards. This option is clearly not available in reforming
financial SOEs.13
Nowhere has this contradiction been made more evident than the
policy of “grasping the large while releasing the small enterprises”
adopted by the 15th Party Congress. On the basis of the SOEs’ national
profile and importance to China’s economy, this policy makes a simple
distinction between large and small enterprises. Unlike the management
framework of the two committees, the distinction here does not rest on
the type of SOE. As such, the central Party will tightly control personnel
decisions of the “large” SOEs, whether financial or non-financial. The
arrangements for placing 44 non-financial SOEs under the direct manage-
ment of the Central Committee, 120 non-financial SOEs under the Party
Central Large-scale Enterprise Work Committee and 30 financial SOEs
under the Party Central Finance Work Committee provide evidence of
this practice.
In the context of an open market economy, the central Party has looked
for ways to spur the Party and state administration to respond to econ-
omic modernization. The policy objective of separation of state and
enterprises (here referred to non-financial SOEs) provides such an option.
The partial delegation of authority allows the central Party to spread the
loss caused by bad-performing “small” enterprises among the local Party
and state administration, as well as to share the cost in revamping the
under-performing “small” enterprises.
Partial delegation of personnel authority downward means that some
SOEs are removed. Yet this does not mean that the leading cadres of
these enterprises are beyond the control of nomenklatura. For example,
Jilin Chemical Industry Company, Shanghai Petrochemical Industry Fac-
tory and the Machine Building Science Research Institute, which were
listed in section four of the 1990 reported list, are now subsidiary
enterprises of the China National Petroleum Corporation, the China
Petrochemicals Corporation and the Party Central Enterprise Work Com-
mittee. These three corporations are absent from the 1998 nomenklatura.
Nevertheless, the leading cadres of the first two are now managed directly
under the Party Central Organization Department whilst the last one is
under the Party Central Enterprise Work Committee.14 As such, these
leading cadres are still either centrally managed or listed in positions to
be reported to the central Party. Some enterprises that appeared in the
1990 reported list have now been transferred to and are managed by local
Party committees. For example, the Kailuan Mine Service Bureau was
transferred to the Hebei local Party committee and has now become the
Kailuan (Group) Limited Company.15 The removal of the Kailuan Mine
Service Bureau from the 1990 reported list is indicative of the fact that
it had been successfully transformed into a non-financial enterprise, and
is now transferred to and managed by Hebei provincial Party committee.
Section three contains the state leaders (guojia lingdaoren) and the
leaders of the central military commission (CMC). It must be noted that
the latter are included in section one of the 1998 job title list as the chair
and members of the CCP CMC and in section three as the chair and
members of the CMC of the PRC. Their inclusion in section three is
recognition of their status as state leaders. It specifically gives the chair
of the CMC the same status as the president of the PRC. This gives CMC
chairs such as Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin legitimacy and formal
power even after they withdraw from other posts.
The separation of the post of the president of the PRC and the chair of
the CMC explicitly renders the option of having different leaders in each
post legitimate. The most important thing is that the separation allows the
chair of the CMC to stay on where circumstances permit. If the same
person is in both posts, he is required to step down if he serves more than
two consecutive terms as president of the PRC.16 Nevertheless, it is now
clear that an ordinary CCP member can become the chair of the CMC if
he is a representative of the National People’s Congress (NPC). As in the
case of Jiang Zemin, one need not be a member of the CCP Central
Committee in order to be nominated and elected the chair of the CCP
CMC.
Sections four and five have slightly expanded the coverage of the NPC
and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC) by
adding to them the Party core group of organs,17 which was created in
1978.18 The expanded political environment immediately after the 4 June
Incident intensified Party building. From 1990s onwards, a system to
promote Party cause (dang de shiye) had evolved. Designated personnel
for Party affairs (zhuanzhi dangwu renyuan) were instituted. For exam-
ple, there were at least 182 designated positions (zhuanzhi zhishu) created
for Party building, Party affairs and discipline inspection in the 1993
administrative reorganization.19 The appearance of the Party core groups
of organs under the NPC and the CPPCC in the 1998 job title list simply
gives recognition to the work and the status of Party building, Party
affairs and discipline inspection.
Section six modestly extends the coverage of the State Council, various
banks and corporations directly under the State Council, as well as
China’s overseas representatives and officials for various purposes.
The people’s armed police and the China National Supply and Market-
ing Co-operatives are absent from the 1998 Job Title List because of a
change in the line of authority.20 The China Aviation Industry Corpor-
16. See Article 79 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China adopted at the
fifth session of the Fifth National People’s Congress and promulgated for implementation by
the proclamation of the National People’s Congress on 4 December 1982. See
http:news.xinhuanet.com/ziliao/2002–02/20/content_283404.htm.
17. Apart from this common change, section four of the 1998 job title list lists an additional
organ, the Research Office Director of the General Office of the Standing Committee of the
National People’s Congress. See Appendix 1.
18. See Zhonggong zhongyang zuzhibu, Zhonggong zhongyang dangshi yanjiushi,
zhongyang dang’anguan, Zhongguo gongchandang zuzhishi ziliao (The Materials on
Organization History of the Communist Party of China) (Beijing: Zhonggong dangshi
chubanshe, 2000), Vol. 7 (hereafter The Organization History Materials), pp. 275 and 375.
19. The data were drawn from Guowuyuan bangongting mishuju, zhongyang bianwei
bangongshi zonghesi (ed.), Zhongyang zhengfu zuzhi jigou (The Organizational Structure of
the Central Government 1993) (Beijing: Zhongguo fazhan chubanshe, 1994) (hereafter The
1993 Structure).
20. The people’s armed police was removed from the nomenklatura because it was made
part of the armed forces in March 1995. Originally, the Ministry of Public Security directly
managed the people’s armed police. Now, it is under the direct management of the Central
Cadre Personnel Management in China 711
ation and the China Aerospace Industry Corporation were both estab-
lished in the 1993 administrative reorganization of the central govern-
ment and were made organs directly under the State Council, hence their
inclusion here.21 A merger of the several power industries and manage-
ment bureaus listed in the 1990 reported list created the State Power
Corporation. This is now listed together with the China National Nuclear
Corporation, the China Ordnance Industry Corporation and the China
State Shipbuilding Corporation (these three corporations were in section
five of the 1990 job title list) in this section because of its strategic
importance in China’s economy. Established in 1958, the China Academy
of Engineering Physics was formally listed under the State Council in the
1998 job title list.22 The need to realign the State Council’s management
jurisdiction and authority had inevitably called for these changes.
Amendments made in this section clearly mark the importance of the
tasks undertaken at the time when the 1998 job title list was issued. These
included the handover of Hong Kong and Macau, China’s entrance into
the WTO, the Pacific Economic Co-operation Organization (PECO) and
the Three Gorges Construction Project. To these ends, units and organs
responsible for these portfolios were included in this section.23
As expected, the 1998 administrative reorganization of the State Coun-
cil led to the reformulation of the 1998 job title list. Some 15 departments
and offices were closed down, four new ones were set up, three renamed,
and 20 departments, offices, banks and bureaus retained. Also established
were 19 state bureaus under the management of the departments and
offices of the State Council.24
However inclusion of more units or organs in the job title list does not
necessarily increase the number of centrally managed cadres. Similarly,
streamlining staff members in the State Council does not unilaterally
reduce the number of centrally managed cadres. One example is the 1998
administrative reorganization which sought to cut the staff size of the
State Council in half. Zhu Rongji argued that the General Office of the
State Council had played a pivotal role in cutting down the number of
vice-premiers from six to four, state councillors from eight to five, and
footnote continued
Military Commission. See The Organization History Materials, pp. 425–431. The China
National Supply and Marketing Co-operative was re-categorized as a mass organization,
hence removed from this section.
21. See The 1993 Structure, pp. 422–431.
22. It was placed in section four of the 1990 reported list. The deputies of the leading cadres
of the Academy are now placed in section three of the 1998 reported list. See Appendix 2
and http://www.caep.ac.cn/.
23. See Appendix 1.
24. See “Guowuyuan jigou gaige fang’an” (“The programme of the administrative reform
of the State Council”) and “Guowuyuan guanyu buwei guanli de guojiaju shezhi de tongzhi”
(“The notice of the State Council on the establishment of the State Bureaus under the
management of the departments and offices of the State Council”) (The State Council [1998]:
No. 6) in Guowuyuan bangongting mishuju he zhongyang jigou bianzhi weiyuanhui
bangongshi zonghesi (ed.), Zhongyang zhengfu zuzhi jigou (The Organizational Structure of
the Central Government 1998) (Beijing: Gaige chubanshe, 1998) (hereafter The 1998
Structure), pp. 18–22 and 27–28.
712 The China Quarterly
25. See Zhu Rongji, “Zai shengbuji ganbu tuijin zhengfu jigou gaige zhuanti yanjiuban
xueyuan zuotanhui shang de jianghua (jiexuan)” (“The speech given in a meeting with the
province/ministry-level cadres on how to promote the government administrative reform
(excerpt)”) (10 April 1998), in The 1998 Structure, pp. 32–37.
26. Even when we consider the number of province/ministry-level cadres from 1997 to
1998 nationally, there was a modest increase of 156, from 2,406 to 2,562. The increase was
less than 1%. Interviews in Beijing, middle-level officials, Ministry of Personnel
(MOP)/(CPOD), April 2000–June 2002. The figures are drawn from Zhonggong zhongyang
zuzhibu, Dangzheng lingdao ganbu tongji ziliao huibian (1954–1998) (Selection of
Documents on the Statistical Information of Party-State Leading Cadres, 1954–1998)
(Beijing: Dangjian duwu chubanshe, 1999) (hereafter The Statistical Information), p.3.
27. See ibid. p.3.
28. The 1998 administrative reorganization of the State Council had definitely made some
changes to the reported list. For example, the number of bureau-level cadres serving in the
Party and state organs of the State Council between 1997 and 1998 had decreased from 7,687
to 6,508, representing a 15% reduction. See ibid.
29. Interviews in Beijing, middle-level officials, (MOP)/(CPOD), March and June 2002.
30. See “Zhonggong zhongyang guanyu jiaqiang dang de jianshe tongzhi” (“The Central
Committee notice on strengthening Party building”), Zhongfa, No. 9 (28 August 1989) in
Renshibu zhengce faguisi (ed.), Renshi gongzuo wenjian xuanbian (Selection of Personnel
Work Documents) (Beijing: Renshi chubanshe, 1993) (hereafter RGWX), Vol. 12 (1989), pp.
12–23
31. See http://www.spp.gov.cn/jgzz/jgzz2.htm.
Cadre Personnel Management in China 713
Section eight of the 1998 job title list includes four additional mass
organizations and covers leading cadres who are centrally managed. The
China National Supply and Marketing Co-operative was included here
after re-categorization. The other three new organizations were the State
Natural Science Foundation Management Committee, the All-China Fed-
eration of Industry and Commerce, and the National Work Committee for
the Elderly.
Section nine identifies the various positions in the province-level as
well as deputy province-level Party and state organizations, including
their judiciaries and procuratorates, which are under the central Party’s
control. In this section, Chongqing is included because it was upgraded
as the fourth centrally administered city. The section covers 15 deputy
province-level cities and excludes the chairs and deputy chairs of the
Party advisory committees (small groups) of provinces, autonomous
regions and centrally administered cities. On balance, the number of
centrally managed cadres in this section might have increased.
Section ten is a new addition. A list of higher learning institutes is a
throwback to the 1984 job title list, which included ten universities. The
inclusion of these higher learning institutes shows the central Party’s
intention to strengthen its grip over them. As clearly indicated in Zhongfa
(issued by the CCP Central Committee), document No. 9 (28 August
1989) and the notice accompanying the promulgation of the 1990 job title
list, the leadership treated the higher education portion of the propaganda
system more cautiously.32 The Party Central Organization Department
and the Party Core Group of the State Education Commission jointly
issued Jiaodang (the Party Core Group of the State Education Com-
mittee) document No. 56 (17 May 1991) and began to institute greater
regularization regarding Party building and leadership corps building.33
From May 1991, prior formal approval – rather than informal consul-
tation – from the Party Central Organization Department was required
regarding leadership appointments to higher learning institutes.
Under the leadership of the CCP Leading Small Group on Party
Building, the Party Central Organization Department, the Party Central
Propaganda Department and the Party Core Group of the Central State
Education Commission launched the First National Conference of Party
Building in Higher Learning Institutes in 1990. It is now an annual
event.34 Against this backdrop, the tightening of control over the higher
32. See “Zhonggong zhongyang guanyu jiaqiang dang de jianshe tongzhi”; Zhongzufa, No.
2 (10 May 1990), RGWX, Vol. 13 (1990), pp. 45–53. For a detailed discussion, see Burns,
“Strengthening central CCP control of leadership selection,” pp. 466–67.
33. The most notable measure was to require that at least one half of the leadership corps
in these higher learning institutes must be responsible for Party affairs and its administration.
See “Zhonggong zhongyang zuzhibu, zhongyang guojia jiaowei dangzu guanyu jinyibu
jiaqiang gaodeng xuexiao lingdao banzi jianshe de tongzhi” (“The Party Central Organization
Department and the Party Core Group of the Central State Education Commission’s notice
on further strengthening leadership corps building of higher education institutes”), Jiaodang
No. 56 (17 May 1991), RGWX, Vol. 14 (1992), pp. 8–17.
34. Interviews in Beijing, middle-level officials, Ministry of Education (MOE), June 2002.
714 The China Quarterly
35. After the Tiananmen Incident, Li Peng and Song Ping made their first university visit
to Beijing University, followed by the second one to Beijing Normal University as a gesture
to pacify university students’ discontent on 9 September 1989. Ibid.
36. Ibid.
37. Ibid.
38. Interviews in Beijing, middle-level officials, (MOE)/(CPOD), March 2002.
Cadre Personnel Management in China 715
39. Interviews in Beijing and Hong Kong, middle-level officials, (MOE)/(CPOD) and an
executive vice-president of a university in Beijing, March and June 2002.
40. Interviews in Beijing, middle-level officials, People’s Bank, June 2002.
41. This is so because many, if not all, leading cadres of the 13 cities previously under
central planning and cities under province were listed in the 1990 reported list. Interviews in
Beijing, middle-level officials, (CPOD), June 2002.
716 The China Quarterly
42. See “Guanyu tiaozheng chebing bumen suoshu xuexiao guanli tizhi de shishi yijian”
(“The implementation opinion about adjusting, scrapping and merging schools subordinate
to the organs of the State Council”), in The 1998 Structure, pp. 88–98.
43. See “Yuanhe chexiao jiu ge weiguan guojiaju (xinwen fenxi)” (“Why are the nine State
Bureaus to be scrapped? [News Analysis]”), Renmin ribao (People’s Daily), 20 February
2001. Note that there might well be some overlaps of schools involved in the 1998 and 1999
reshuffling exercises.
44. This calculation is based on section four of the 1990 reported list and the report made
by Ming pao (Hong Kong) on 3 February 1999. There were 21 foreign trade corporations and
subsidiary units under the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Co-operation.
45. They are the China Research Institute of Atomic Energy Science (CRIAEC), the China
Warships Research Institute (CWRI), the China Research Institute of Launching Technology
(CRILT), the China Research Institute of Space Technology (CRIST), the China Changfeng
Science and Technology Industry Corporation (CCSTIC) and the China Haiying Science and
Technology Industry Corporation (CHSTIC).
46. In June 1999, the China Aerospace Industry Corporation was split into two organs, the
China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation and the China Aerospace Machinery
and Electronics Corporation. The latter was renamed the China Aerospace Science and
Industry Corporation on 6 September 2001. The CRILT and the CRIST are now subsidiary
organs of the China Aerospace Science and Technology Group. The CCSTIC and the CHSTIC
are directly under the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation. The CRIAEC is
subordinate to the China National Nuclear Corporation. The CWRI is directly under the China
State Shipbuilding Corporation. For further details, see their websites.
Cadre Personnel Management in China 717
section six of the 1998 job title list and section one of the 1998 reported
list, respectively.
The reduction of the number of enterprises and research institutes was
a result of enterprise reform introduced since 1997. Zheng Silin, the
deputy director of the State and Economic Commission, reportedly said
that the State Council would take three years to reform, restructure,
transform and strengthen the management of those large and medium-
sized enterprises that were not making a profit.47 The Ministry of Finance
began the delinking exercise by withdrawing financial capital from its
enterprises in July 1998.48 In the second half of 1998, the Ministry of
Foreign Trade and Economic Co-operation implemented a full-scale
programme to consolidate and reform the 30-odd enterprises directly
under it. Some 21 of them were moved so as to come under the
supervision of the Party Central Large-scale Enterprise Work Committee.
The rest were to be handled by a small group headed by Sheng Huaren
of the State Economic and Trade Commission.49 It was reported in
December 1998 that the central Party had set up the CCP Leading Small
Group for Delinking Non-financial Enterprises from the Party and State
Organs to oversee this delinking.50 In early 1999, the Ministry of Com-
munications started to delink several enterprises, including some listed in
the 1990 reported list.51
The State Economic and Trade Commission took the most important
significant step that removed most of research institutes and institutes of
other kinds such as museums, libraries and travel agencies from the 1990
reported list. In preparation for abolishing the nine State Bureaus under
it, the Commission turned most of their 242 research institutes into
science and technology type enterprises. The Commission merged the rest
of them with enterprise groups. The Party Central Large-scale Enterprise
Work Committee itself, its subordinate committees or local Party com-
mittees would manage these revamped enterprises. Other institutes of the
State Bureaus, either under the State Economic and Trade Commission or
other departments and offices of the State Council, also adopted the
principle of localized management. Accordingly, local Party committees
47. “Jingmaowei huibao jinnian guoqi gaige jinzhan” (“The State Economic and Trade
Commission reports the progress of state-owned enterprise reform of this year”), The
Economic Journal (Hong Kong), 15 December 1998.
48. See “Caizhengbu chedi zhengqi fenjia” (“The Ministry of Finance thoroughly delinks
from itself enterprises”), The Eastern Oriental Daily (Hong Kong), 21 July 1998.
49. See “Zhongyang dangzheng jiguan niandi yu jingban qiye tuogou, jingwai sheli qiye
zanbu lieru tuogou fanwei” (“The Central Committee and the State Council will delink their
self-run enterprises: enterprises set up outside the mainland will not be in the interim included
into the scope of delinking”), The Economic Journal (Hong Kong), 15 December 1998.
50. See ibid.
51. This included the Changjiang Transportation Company, the China Overseas
Transportation Company, the Hong Kong China Merchants Group Company, and the China
Road, Harbour and Bridge Construction Company. The latter was set up after merging the
China Harbour Construction Company and the Highway Construction Company (these two
companies also appeared in section four of the 1990 reported list) with other companies.
Interviews in Beijing, middle-level officials, (MOP)/(CPOD), April 2001.
718 The China Quarterly
Conclusion
Following such reforms, Chinese officials have not stopped flaunting
their dissatisfaction with the deteriorating financial performance and the
loss-making phenomenon of financial and non-financial SOEs.53 With
markets on a rise and being continually opened up, irregularities in the
Chinese financial system will undoubtedly damage the growing potential
of China’s economy, erode the state property and cause failure in China’s
attempt to upgrade industry as a whole.54 Facing runaway economics, Zhu
Rongji resorted to a tactic of managed marketization, leading a closed
market in the direction of an open market.55 From this, the framework in
itself did not diminish but instead emphasized the role of the party-state.
By adopting a series of tools of economic intervention and guidance, it
evolved as well as dismantled institutions, allowing private enterprises to
grow alongside SOEs instead of replacing them. The nomenklatura
certainly reflected the evolving character of the party-state in making a
transition towards a socialist market economy.
In China’s transitional economy, the course of transforming economic
institutions is not simply a matter of economic theory. It is about the
combined use of command- and market-tools to clear up rent-seeking
bureaucracies. In this regard, the nomenklatura framework is indicative of
the contradictory desire of the party-state: economic modernization in
combination with continued political control. The differential framework
with regard to SOEs’ personnel management across sectors shows that
the central Party only opens up the economic front of small, mainly
non-financial SOEs, and allows them to respond to marketization. For
SOEs of fundamental and strategic importance to China’s economy, it
maintains tight and continued control.
In tackling China’s runaway economics, the first problem was not of
economics but of politics. The focus of current mainstream literature on
the study of nomenklatura is confined to the scope of Party control and
52. See “Yuanhe chexiao jiu ge weiguan guojiaju (xinwen fenxi),” Renmin ribao, 20
February 2001. These enterprises are listed in the nomenklatura at the corresponding levels.
Interviews in Beijing, middle-level officials, (CPOD), April 2001.
53. “Central Committee bodies to oversee commercial ties in bid to ally corruption worries,
Party strengthens grip on enterprises,” in South China Morning Post (Hong Kong), 1
December 1998, p. 8; Ming pao (Hong Kong), 14 December 1998, A11; Ta kung pao (Hong
Kong), 5 and 10 January 2001, p. C8 and C9.
54. For discussion of the irregularities in the Chinese financial system, see X.L. Ding,
“Systemic irregularities and spontaneous property transformation in the Chinese financial
system.” The China Quarterly, No. 163 (September 2000), pp. 655–676.
55. For discussion, see Edward S. Steinfeld, Forging Reform in China, The Fate of
State-Owned Industry, pp. 129–158.
Cadre Personnel Management in China 719
the extent to which state authority is negotiated and refined. The 1998
nomenklatura is no exception: the Party’s unitary political leadership is
called upon once again to lead China into making a transition towards a
socialist market economy.
Last but not least, the 1998 nomenklatura indicates the continuing
importance that the CCP places on control of personnel management to
maintain its position in the political system. Nevertheless, this authoritat-
ive list was not published in the Ministry of Personnel annual series of
volumes on personnel work, as were the 1990 list and the 1984 notice.56
This indicates the heightened secrecy surrounding the system and pro-
vides evidence that the Party perceives its behind-the-scenes control to be
more sensitive now than before. The increased secrecy surrounding the
nomenklatura runs counter to pressures for increasing transparency that
come from China’s accession to the WTO. Increasing secrecy also runs
counter to the Party’s own professed interest in increased transparency
and open administration (zhengwu gongkai).
1. PARTY CENTRAL
Position Unit
Secretary General CCP Central Committee
Members Standing Committee of the CCP
Politburo
Members, alternate members CCP Politburo
Secretaries CCP Secretariat
Members, alternate members CCP Central Committee
Chairman, vice-chairmen, members CCP Central Military Commission
Secretary, deputy secretaries, CCP Central Discipline Inspection
Standing Committee members, Commission
members, Secretary General
56. See Zhongzufa, No. 6 (14 July 1984) RGWX, Vol. 7 (1984), pp. 39–41; Zhongzufa, No.
2 (10 May 1990) RGWX, Vol. 13 (1990), pp. 45–53.
720 The China Quarterly
7. JUDICIARY, PROCURATORATE
Position Unit
President, vice-presidents Supreme People’s Court
Members Judicial Committee of the Supreme
People’s Court
Secretary, deputy secretaries, members Party Core Group of the Supreme
People’s Court
Head Discipline Inspection Group of the
Supreme People’s Court
Director Political Department of the Supreme
People’s Court
Procurator General, Supreme People’s Procuratorate
deputy procurators general
Members Procuratorial Committee of the Supreme
People Procuratorate
Secretary, deputy secretaries, members Party Core Group of the Supreme
People’s Procuratorate
Head Discipline Inspection Group of the
Supreme People’s Procuratorate
Director Political Department of the Supreme
People’s Procuratorate
8. MASS ORGANIZATIONS
Position Unit
Presidents, vice-presidents All-China Federation of Trade Unions
(ACFTU), All-China Federation of
Women (ACFW), China Association
for Science and Technology (CAST)
First secretaries, secretaries, Secretariats of ACFTU, ACFW, CAST
Secretaries, deputy secretaries, members Party core groups of ACFTU, ACFW,
CAST
First secretary, secretaries Secretariat of the Central Committee of
the Chinese Communist Youth League
Chairmen, vice-chairmen China Federation of Literary and Art
Circles, Chinese Writers’ Association,
All-China Journalists’ Association
Secretaries Secretariats in the above organizations
Secretaries, deputy secretaries, members Party core groups in the above
organizations
Cadre Personnel Management in China 725
Source:
Zhongzufa [1998] Document No. 11, Zhonggong zhongyang zuzhibu guanyu
xiuding Zhonggong zhongyang guanli de ganbu zhiwu mingchengbiao de tongzhi
(The Notification About Amending the Job Title List of Cadres Centrally Managed by
the CCP Issued by the CCP Central Organization Department), 13 August 1998,
(Internal Document).
Position Unit
Directors, deputy directors Offices under CCP leading small groups
Directors, deputy directors Offices under CCP central commissions
(committees)
General secretaries, deputy general CCP leading small groups, where
secretaries approved and established
General secretaries, deputy secretaries CCP central commissions (committees),
where approved and established
Bureau-level heads (juzhang, zhuren, Various bureaus (offices) of central and
buzhang), deputy bureau-level state organs, subordinate organs of the
heads State Council, offices of the State
Council, institutes directly under the
State Council, and state bureaus
managed by various ministries and
commissions
Bureau-level heads, Various bureaus (offices) of
deputy bureau-level heads ministry-level people’s mass
organizations, institutes, and
newspapers whose leading cadres are
listed under and managed by the
Central Committee
728 The China Quarterly
Research Institutes
Coal Science Research Industry
Beijing Institute of Non-ferrous Metals Research
China Agricultural Science Institute
China Forestry Science Research Institute
Steel Research Institute
Geological Sciences Research Institute
Railroad Scientific Research Institute
China Research Institute of Atomic Energy Science
China Warships Research Institute
China Research Institute of Launching Technology
China Research Institute of Space Technology
Chinese Academy of Medicine
Corporations
China Changfeng Science and Technology Industry Corporation
China Haiying Science and Technology Industry Corporation
Culture Institutes
Imperial Palace Museum
Museum of Chinese History
Museum of Chinese Revolution
Beijing National Library
Health Institute
Beijing Hospital
Source:
Zhongzufa [1998] Document No. 11, Zhonggong zhongyang zuzhibu guanyu xiuding
Zhonggong zhongyang guanli de ganbu zhiwu mingchengbiao de tongzhi (The Notification
About Amending the Job Title List of Cadres Centrally Managed by the CCP Issued by the
CCP Central Organization Department), 13 August 1998 (Internal Document).