Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Below table gives clear idea of generation impact with examples when module arrangement
deviates from south with respect to location of site.
Location in India South East Facing South West Facing East Facing West Facing
Southern 1% 1% 3-4% 3-4%
Western 3-4% 4-5% 13-14% 14-15%
Eastern 2-3% 3-4% 9-10% 10-11%
Northern 4-5% 5-6% 17-18% 18-19%
*Approx. percentage difference in values compared to south facing is indicated in the above table
for India.
For buildings with non-south facing orientation, if the modules are placed south then the capacity of
the system might reduce.
Usual shadow causing objects in roofs are nearby buildings, ventilators, parapet wall, trees etc. It is
important to realize the potential of the shadow objects either the effect is permanent or temporary.
Shadow analysis is done to find the shadow free area for the most daytime hours in all seasons.
Wide range of tools and software applications are available for analysis of shadow effect of objects.
Shadow objects to be simulated in the software as per actual to find out the shadow free area.
Adequate distance from the shadow objects (Objects such as nearby buildings, parapet wall) to be
left to prevent modules from shade. Shadow generated from the software to be plotted in the
AutoCAD layout, resulting to shadow free area for module placement.
Figure 9: Obstacles - Water Pipeline Figure 10: Shadow Objects & Obstacles
Tilt depends on the geographical location of the site, selection of the tilt to be optimized to capture
the solar window of all seasons. Total annual irradiation on the plane of the collector is maximized
by selection of optimal tilt angle for the site. Tilt has impact on inter-row shading and associated
shading losses.
In shed type roof placement of module flat along the roof shall be adopted.
Finer analysis may need to be made to account for:
a. Soiling
b. Shading
c. Seasonal irradiation distribution for different seasons.
Pitch distance to be maintained between rows of modules to avoid inter-row shading, pitch
distances varies with the site latitude.
The shading limit may be reduced either by reducing the tilt angle or increasing the inter row space.
Reducing the tilt angle below the optimal is sometimes a choice as this may give only a minimal
reduction in annual yield.
Modules to be placed in organized rows. It should also incorporate access routes for operation &
maintenance at appropriate intervals.
Space for obstacles such as water pipeline, skylights, vents also to be addressed.
Yield generation report to be simulated to get the annual energy generation, losses associated with
various configurations of tilt angle, orientation and row spacing and to obtain an economic
optimization.
Balance of system consists of Inverters, lightning protection system, weather monitoring station,
earthing connection scheme etc.
Layout to be planned with minimal cable runs and associated electrical losses, also considering
access routes and sufficient space between rows to allow movement for maintenance purposes.
Conclusion:
This paper provides the stepwise process for creating a module layout for rooftop solar plant. Basic
factors like orientation of the building, tilt & pitch for the system are discussed which are to be
considered while making a module layout.
The steps as laid in the document shall be followed for preparation of module layout accounting the
obstructions, their effects & provisions for future maintenance shall be catered.
Components & elements starting from type of roof, identification & analysis of shadow casting
objects, importance of yield generation report are also discussed in the paper.