Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
by
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
in
Department of C i v i l Engineering
March 1989
degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it
freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive
copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my
publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written
permission.
Department of C i v i l Engineering
T h e U n i v e r s i t y o f British Columbia
Vancouver, Canada
DE-6 (2/88)
ABSTRACT
i n R and o'.
m
The e f f e c t of continuous variations i n b, under constant R, o' and
' m
- iii -
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Abstract i i
L i s t of Figures ix
L i s t of Tables xiv
L i s t of Symbols xv
Acknowledgements . xvi
1. INTRODUCTION 1
2.2.1 Anisotropy 16
P r i n c i p a l Stresses 28
2.3 SUMMARY Al
3.1 INTRODUCTION A3
- iv -
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
- v -
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
- vi -
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
S t r a i n Paths 1AA
S t r a i n Paths 148
5.5.1 Increase i n o 1
at various a 153
m
Stress-Strain Behaviour 153
- v i i -
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
Page
REFERENCES 184
APPENDIX 195
- viii -
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure
T r i a x i a l Compression 50
- ix -
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Page
- x -
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Page
- xi-
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Page
b-Tests 150
- xii -
LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)
Page
- xiii -
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Tables
- xiv -
LIST OF SYMBOLS
normal stress
shear stress
major effective principal stress
intermediate effective principal stress
minor effective principal stress
0J/O3 = principal effective stress ratio
(oJ+Oj+op/S = mean effective normal stress
(a' -o' )
2 3 / (a[-a' )
3 = intermediate principal stress parameter
direction of o relative to the deposition direction
1
normal strain
shear strain
major principal strain
intermediate principal strain
minor principal strain
e +e +e
1 2 3 = volumetric strain
ej-e 3 = maximum shear strain
direction of major principal strain increment (de ) a
friction angle
nonuniformity coefficient for an individual stress component
(see expression 3.8).
nonuniformity coefficient in terms of stress ratio R
(see expresion 3.9).
relative density
- xv -
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks are also due to Professors W.D.L. Finn and V.K. Garga, who also
Dawit, Mustapha, Wije, Ralph, Carlos, Upul, Francisco, and John for help-
f u l and c l a r i f y i n g discussions.
program.
- xv i -
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
al., 1983). The DSC i n i t s present version can be used for stress path
anisotropic materials.
questions about the v a l i d i t y of HCT data have been raised i n some cases.
3
specimens i s proposed.
r a t i o s and directions.
anisotropy on loading.
CHAPTER 2
parameter b = (o -o )/(Oj-o ))
3 3 3 on sand behaviour, b u t stemmed from t h e
response o f sands.
conditions.
cylindrical specimens (Bishop and Henkel, 1962), where only two stress
Principal
Test Method Stress Imposed Conditions Main C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s Selected References
Control
Standard °i a =o
2 3 & a=0(compression)or most used i n p r a c t i c e ; Bishop & Henkel (1962)
Triaxial o =o
2 1 & a=90°(extension) axisymmetric stress paths; Bishop & Wesley (1975)
°r ° 9 =
^a s s u r a e <
Stress Directions
Fixed Principal
Plane °i e =0
2 simulates many f i e l d condi- Cornforth (196A)
Strain °3
a=0 (compression) or tions; f r i c t i o n effects at Campanella & Vaid (1973)
Triaxial a=90°(extension) r i g i d boundaries
Hollow °1
a=0 or 90° assumption f o r o and Og r
K i r k p a t r i c k (1957)
Cylinder d i s t r i b u t i o n s ; large non- Broms & Ratman (1963)
°2 V i ' h=°
p T
n i A
Triaxial °3
stress controlled uniformities near f a i l u r e
Torsional °1
cylind. specimens: non-uniform; Habib (1953)
Triaxial °2 x g d i s t r . and o =Og assumed
z r Saada & Baah (1967)
°3
sin a=b 2
hollow c y l i n d e r s : P P ^ e
=
0
Stress Directions
Directional °1
e,=0 . f l e x i b l e boundaries i n the Arthur et a l . (1977)
Shear °3
plane of s t r a i n ; low stress Sture et a l . (1987)
Cell a stress controlled levels; complex techniques for
s t r a i n measurement
Hollow
Cylinder
a
i V i p
; V° assumptions f o r o , Og and x g Broms & Casbarian (1965)
d i s t r i b u t . ; large non-
r z
Hight et a l . (1983)
Torsional °3
usually stress controlled uniformities near f a i l u r e ; most Sayao & Vaid (1988)
a general stress path device
07
07
ever I
I
cr,
o>o>cr x
0 7 = cr e
07 > (T > <T
2 3
Gi
<J> h
^^0T = CT e 6 X = fly =0
s i n oc = b o;,cr
2
2 ,cr ,c<=(?)
3
e) Torsional triaxial f ) Simple shear g) Directional shear cell h) Hollow cylinder torsional
Townsend (1981).
direction.
ized bags or membranes (Ko and Scott, 1967; Arthur and Menzies, 1968);
(Pearce, 1971; Hosseini and Cousens, 1988); (3) mixed boundaries, where
11
the use of hollow cylinder t r i a x i a l devices has often been raised. This
and Townsend, 1981; Saada, 1988). When the specimen's axis of symmetry
inclined.
a single s o i l element.
m
Another shear device that imposes continuous r o t a t i o n of p r i n c i p a l
1969; Saada and Townsend, 1981; Lacasse and Vucetic, 1981; Budhu,
men constrained between smooth r i g i d end platens on the other two faces.
although some d e t a i l s associated with the shear loading system are still
average value on the central plane have been observed along the a3
and Arthur, 1986). Moreover, DSC specimens of loose sand have been
1981a).
recently suggested and can be expected over the near future. Wong and
The only device suitable for general stress path tests i n which 4
r o zo
and Sayao and Vaid (1988b), these non-uniformities can however be greatly
2.2.1 Anisotropy
cubical specimen.
Wong and Arthur, 1985). As stated by Saada (1981), "a stress induced
reported by Miura and Toki (198A) from drained compression and extension
sand deposits.
situ.
i n more d e t a i l l a t e r .
55
0 30 60
CT, _ d i r e c t i o n , oc (deg)
T1 Standard 86 <7
'= 0-3=50 Oda
2 et a l , 1978
T2 Triaxial 83 cr'=03=100
2 Oda , 1976
To yo Lira
T3 cr* = 50 Oda
3 et a l , 1978
Plane 89
T4 cr'=4oo Oda 3 et a l , 1978
Strain
LB 1 Arthur $ Assadi, 1977
Leighton
LB2 True Triax. 90 C '=fJ3 = 55
2 Arthur 4 Menzies, 1972
Buzzard
A D.S.Cell 0-3'= 14 Wong 4 A r t h u r , 1985
Notes :
( I ) all tests d r a i n e d ; ( 2 ) DSC tests non - t i l t e d specimen
loads. Despite these differences i n testing techniques and the low value
t r i a x i a l tests on the same material (Arthur and Menzies, 1972) can not be
f u l l y explained.
solid cylinders and simple shear tests suffer from significant stress
together with DSC tests, the other options available for studies of
anisotropy of sands.
Symes et a l . (1982, 1983, 1984 and 1988) and Miura (1985) agree with the
1986).
for both Toyoura and Ham r i v e r sands i n dense states. This observation
previously discussed.
pluviated sands, carried out i n the HCT device are reproduced in Fig.
s t i f f n e s s with increase i n a may be noted for both dense and medium dense
22
70
3 0 I— 1
1 1 1 1 1 L_
0 30 60 90
0", — d i r e c t i o n , o c ( d e g )
against Symes et a l . (1988) HCT tests on medium dense sand. When the
These R levels were shown to correspond to more than 50% of the maximum
sand.
Fabric Anisotropy
2.2 to 2.4 are the concepts of fabric anisotropy introduced by Oda (1972
particles.
1981; Haruyama, 1981; Shibuya and Hight, 1987). This has been attributed
any two p a r t i c l e s .
result, new geometric fabric gradually evolves and the sand becomes
from the DSC and the cubical t r i a x i a l devices. In both cases sand
,0 RELOADING o
4
* O
/ / / fj£ 14 KPa
P - AVERAGE PRE-
LOADING CURVE
(oc= 0)
J I I L_
"max = °i - <-3
have also carried out an additional test i n which the specimen was again
paths and yet l i t t l e i s known about the effects of these rotations. This
et a l . , 1983).
29
isolated.
J I L
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
CK ( deg)
the post-peak region of the BS, unstable response under stress controlled
2 P0S,
' i!l|Pre-pe k
pe
a
a) contractant region
Ham r i v e r sand
D r = 44 %
b = 0.50
°L°L(kPa>
2 AO
100
90 0
b) complete surface
pore pressures are expected to develop when the ESP l i e s beneath the BS
On the other hand, large pore pressures would develop when the ESP
t r a v e l s on the BS
q = (o -o )/2,
1 3 o^, a and e. T h i s BS was suggested to q u a l i t a t i v e l y
and Vaid (1989a) , not only induced anisotropy, but also previous stress
monitored or c o n t r o l l e d .
(o -o ).
1 3 Being non-dimensional, b directly represents -the r e l a t i v e
Bianchini, 1978; Saada, 1981; Saada and Puccini, 1985), the use of b,
<j>' with b have been reported. These are schematically shown i n F i g . 2.9.
are reproduced.
F i g u r e 2.8 I n f l u e n c e of S t r e s s Parameter b on S t r e s s - S t r a i n Behaviour i n True
T r i a x i a l Tests ( a f t e r K j e l l m a n , 1936).
37
60°, are also i n agreement with the conclusion that cj>' i s the lowest at
assessed from HCT stress path tests i n which a l l other stress parameters
40
GLASS S P H E R E S , LOOSE
36
0>
32
failure
28
o
- E
5* 24 - yielding
20
0.2
_ » 0.1
a> o
o -0.1
-0.2
o» 0.4
0"
s
—
g » 0.3
E >»
o 0.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
b * (cr;-cr;>/<<r;-cr;)
and 1 under drained conditions. Such tests have, not yet been reported
i n the l i t e r a t u r e .
2.3 SUMMARY
laboratory stress path devices fail to meet the fundamental and ideal
levels. Thus, some of the conclusions from these studies are question-
developed at the University of B.C. (see chapter 4). Due to the inherent
CHAPTER 3
3.1 INTRODUCTION
the wall. 'No go' regions of the stress space (R, b, a) were delineated
formity are advanced i n terms of R. Based on these concepts, new 'no go'
44
e
0
a n d
r-
zQ
cylinder. Since the stresses vary across the wall of the cylinder for a
average stresses and strains. The following expressions are used for
c a l c u l a t i n g average stresses:
F + TT(P R 3
- P.R?)
z e e i i , 0 ,v
Z
TT(R - R.)
e l
°r (P R 2
- P.RJ + 2(P - P.)R R £n(R /R.)
J 2
°0 ( R
e " V
F i g u r e 3.1 Load and S t r e s s C o n d i t i o n s i n HCT Specimens.
A6
radii.
r u zo
al.
Z U Zu
-(AR - AR.)
e l
e (3.5)
r R - R.
e I
where AG i s the angular displacement at the base.
measured volume change of the inner chamber and AR g can be computed from
strain corresponds to e . 2
R
1 1
(3.8)
Pa = R - R. S
e l
48
r o zo av
value of the stress component and S^ = stress l e v e l , taken as ( Q ) f ° T
Z a v
r
component.
r o J
across the specimen w a l l . For the stress state (a), R ranges between
2.64 and 3.61 and for (b) between 2.54 and 3.92. Such nonuniformities i n
ratio (R r a a x ) i n
F i g u r e 3.2 could possibly represent a state of f a i l u r e ,
1.0 I . . . + , , , , , 1
-4 -2 0 2 4 6
STRAIN ( % )
R - R
max mm (3.9)
R
av
i n Figure 3.2 (B^ = 0.32 and 0.A6 for cases (a) and (b)) would be c l e a r l y
unacceptable.
o^. I t may be noted i n Figure 3.A that, but for near the corners (b=l,
be limited to 0.20.
may be noted i n Figure 3.6 where B R contours and surface similar to those
° (a) UBC-HCT : /? R contours ; R = 3 (b) UBC-HCT : (3
R surface ; R = 3
where B £ 0.20 i s now much more extensive than i n Figure 3.5. Thus a
a=0) and (b=0, a=90°) and, unlike for B , also along a ridge near a = 45°
3
shown i n Figure 3.7 for two stress states (b=0.5, a=0) and (b=0, a=45°).
excess of about 2.0 to 2.2 for the specimen geometry under consideration
(R g = 7.6 cm, R^= 5.1 cm). Most HCT devices may thus be not suitable for
I t can be shown that for a given stress state (R, b and a ) , B does D
K
not depend on the l e v e l of a' . This i s a consequence of assuming o = 1
56
R = o"! / cr . 3
for the stress state (b=0, a=45°) at R=2 and 3. It may be noted that,
1983):
the wall;
membrane penetration.
58
10 20 30
Thickness , R - R, ( mm )e
tions of the inner radius of the specimen, for a fixed wall thickness of
25.A mm. The r e s u l t s are shown for the stress state (b=0, ot=45°) at R=2
technique was adopted i n the design of UBC-HCT device (see Chapter 4).
of these devices were used only for simulating multiaxial stress states,
stress paths with a=0 due to stress nonuniformities (see Figures 3.5 and
soils.
the two boxed areas i n the figure. The suggestions are based on both
1 Cooling & Saith 1936 Building Research Station (ESC) 19-38 50.8 41.3 Clay
w i - ° Undrained shear strength
p
2 Norton 1938 M.I.T. (USA) 50.8 11.1 7.9 Clay Torsional deforraability ceraaic clays
3 Geuze & Kie 1953 S.H. Laboratory, Delft (HOD 80.0 19.0 13.0 Clay Undrained creep
4 Kirkpatrick
5 Haythornthvaite
1957 university of Glasgov (SCOT) 152.4 50.8 31.8 Sand
vv° o, e f f e c t on f a i l u r e condition
1960 Brom University (USA) I t t Silt o, e f f e c t on f a i l u r e condition
6 Whitman & Luicher 1962 H.I.T. (USA) 76 or 127 25 or 19 12.7 Sand S o i l - s t r u c t u r e i n t e r a c t i o n at f a i l u r e
V 0 :
V°
7 Wu et «1. 1963 Michigan State University (USA) 127.0 50.8 38.1 CSS
v° o, e f f e c t on f a i l u r e condition
8
Brorai t Ratntn
9 Broms & Casbarian
1963 Cornell University (USA) 114.3 76.2 38.1
38.1
Clay
v° 3-D consol. e f f e c t s on strength
1965 Cornell University (USA) 254.0 63.5 Clay o a and a effects on strength
10 Brora & Jaaal 1965 Cornell University (USA) 304.8 76.2 38.1 Sand
v° V a l i d i t y of ° '°g assumption
r
11
Esrlg i Beaben
12 Suklje & Drnovsek
1965 Cornell University (USA) 203.2 50.8 38.1 Sand
v° o, and t , e f f e c t s on strength
1965 University of Ljubljana (TOG) 80.0 32.0 20.0 Clay Deformability under plane stress
V 0 :
V°
13 Jamal 1966 Cornell University (USA) 203.2 50.8 13-38 Sand Wall thickness e f f e c t on strength
V 0 : P
.- i
p
1* 1967 Case W.R. University . (USA) 151.1 35.1 25.4 Clay Influence of anisotropy
Saada h Baah
p
.- i p
IS Proctor
16 lomize et a l .
1967 University of Manchester (EKG) 152.4 50.8 19.1 Sand
v° Drained shear strength
1969 C i v i l Engineering Institute (USSR) 180.0 155.0 125.0 Clay Drained creep under 3-D stress state
17 Frydman et a l .
18 Drnevich
1971 Israel I n s t i t u t e of Tech.
1972 University of Kentucky
(ISRL) 203.2 50.8
25.0
25.4
20.0
Sand
v° End r e s t r a i n t ; membrane penetration
Torsional resonant column tests
(USA) 100.0 Sand p
.- i p
19 Arnold & M i t c h e l l
20 Ishibaahi 4 Sherif
1973 University of Adelaide
1974 University of Washington
(AUS) 142.0 76.0 51.0
25.4
Sand
v° 3-D stress e f f e c t on strength
(USA) 13 to 25 50.8 Sand Liquefaction characteristics
21 Tong 1975 University of Waterloo (CAN) 203.2 50.8 31.8 Sand Y i e l d and f a i l u r e c r i t e r i a
22 Lade 1975 U.C.L.A. (USA) 50.0 110.0 90.0 Sand a e f f e c t on s t r e s s - s t r a i n
p
.- i p
23 Ivaiaki et a l . 1978 Inst. Ind. Science (JAP) 100.0 50.0 30.0 Sand S t r e s s - s t r a i n for y > 10-'X
p
.- i p
2* Ude 1981 U.C.L.A. (USA) 400.0 110.0 90.0 Sand Influence of specimen's height
p
.- i p
29 Ishibashi et a l . 1985 Cornell University (USA) 142.0 35.5 25.4 Sand Liquefaction characteristics
p
.- i p
30 Miura et a l . 1986 Hokkaido University (JAP) 200.0 50.0 30.0 Sand -J a e f f e c t on s t r e s s - s t r a i n & strength
31 Alarcon et a l . 1986 Purdue University (USA) 203.0 35.5 19.0 Sand
v l p
34 Sayao & Vaid 1988 University of B.C. (CAN) 304.8 76.2 50.8 Sand Effects o f o.R.b & o' on s t r a i n resp.
is
121 refer to
40 (FVRj=62)
8 = 10 I3c 10=13c Table 3.1
E
E
35-f or
9
15 J5
or
16 J6
30 +
-9 J3b = l7 20 .27
20:25
25
m
27 9=l3b 25
19 19
17=34
1.0. 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.6 3.0 3.4
RiVR
e H/
2R E
a) wall thickness: R - R. = 20 to 26 mm
e l
b) inner radius: 0.65 * R./R * 0.82
l e
c) height: 1.8 «; H/2R <; 2.2
66
CHAPTER 4
The specimen dimensions are: height = 30.2 cm, outer diameter =15.2 cm,
reported i n Chapter 5.
aluminum platens at the top and bottom boundaries. Drainage from the
The specimen i s fixed at the top. Normal and shear loads are
applied at the bottom. This configuration has two main advantages: (1)
and four stress and four s t r a i n components i n general stress path tests
LVDT ( A H )
POSITIONING
BOLT TOP CROSS BEAM
CHAMBER TOP
TOP CAP
TOP PLATEN
NOTE :
SEE FIG. 4.8 PLEXIGLASS CELL
FOR DETAILS
LOADING FRAME
SOIL SPECIMEN
RIGID ROD
BASE PLATEN
BASE PEDESTAL
PRESSURE
EXTERNAL PRESSURE
TRANSDUCER
PORE PRESSURE
INTERNAL PRESSURE
SUPPORTING LVDT (6)
TABLE
i
LINEAR - ROTARY LOADING SHAFT
BEARINGS
TORQUE CELL
TORQUE CABLES
CENTRAL PULLEY
TORQUE
If PULLEY
TORQUE
PISTON
0 20
SCALE (cm)
Supply pressure to the test frame was regulated to a maximum of 750 kPa,
discussed l a t e r i n t h i s chapter.
errors.
70
minimize these e r r o r s .
permit l i n e a r and rotary motions of the loading shaft and are placed i n
series at the base of the c e l l chamber. The specimen's base platen and
between the 0-ring and the shaft may be neglected, since i t was found to
Figures 4.1 and 4.2. Torsional loads are applied by two pairs of
either direction.,
Figure A.3. S i x 12.8 mm diameter porous discs are set 60° apart, flush
with each platen surface, for drainage i n and out of the specimen.
Many HCT devices use porous discs over the f u l l platen surface and thus
Some researchers have used annular end platens with a layer of glued
frictional contact area with full annular porous stones. The same
A) Perspective
•—' n
I
r-i I-I
C) S i d e view
;
uJ
111
I—I—I
0 5
scale (cm)
F l u i d Pressures
d i f f u s i o n loops.
0.24 kPa.
later.
S t r a i n Measurements
the s o i l specimen and of the inner pressure chamber. These are required
76
LEGEND
PT •« gage pressure
transducer
WS B
de-aired water
WS supply
SOIL
SPECIMEN
B
non - displacement
valve
t
^fc 1
- diffusion spiral
(Z|.5m)
DPT
(b) BACKPRESSURE
e ) , as explained i n Chapter 3.
Q
placed in the top cap seals the inner chamber pressure around the
v e r t i c a l rod.
diameter porous stones flush with the platens surface; (b) careful
counter
weight
about 5x10"*%.
acquisition/processing requirements.
insignificant.
For each selected scan, output voltages and processed test data are
reconstituted specimens.
laboratory have been developed, the most common being moist tamping
with controlled density (Vaid and Negussey, 1984), and has been
frequently used at UBC over more than twenty years (e.g., Vaid, 1968;
known height between the bottom and top platens. A d i a l gage mounted on
The two rubber membranes are positioned and sealed to the inner and
outer surfaces of the Base platen. De-aired water i s flushed through the
83
The inner and outer s p l i t molds are then assembled. The outer mold has
pieces are held together by two i n t e r n a l metallic discs, the annular base
top of the tubes. The annular cavity formed by the molds i s then f i l l e d
with de-aired water. Once the sand flask i s inverted and has i t s tube
(Fig. 4.6). During the pluviation process, the "flasks are slowly
final densification.
required for the final grade has been deposited. The upper surface i s
about -2 kPa (Fig. 4.7). This causes minimal disturbance of sand grains
elevation).
bution throughout the specimen (Vaid and Negussey, 1984). The top platen
follows the settlement of the top surface and any tendency for t i l t i n g i s
deformation measurements.
86
levelling
I
bar
extension
container
outer E
u
former
::r::''.\".
O
C
M
tl
sand
specimen
.•••v.i;\-v
p.- •;
••»; v. •**
inner excess
former water
excess
sand
remove entrapped a i r bubbles between the rubber membranes and the top
platen. A f t e r sealing both membranes to the top platen with 0-rings, the
specimen preparation.
loading piston u n t i l the top cap contacts the top cross beam of the
T - : -o-
TOP
LOADING
PEXI GLASS CAP
CELL
II
il
TOP DRAINAGE
CENTRAL
ROD
TOP
PLATEN
fit I I
I i
i i
IT
11
SOIL
OUTER INNER SPECIMEN
LVEMBRANE MEMBRANE
'.•.v\'-.*.;
•.V . V . V -.J';'
i'. -i.Cf>A'
;
POROUS
DISC
| DRAINAGE
GROOVE
BASE
PLATEN
PEDESTAL
CELL BASE
I I I I I I
0 5
SCALE (cm)
is then inserted into the loading cap at 30 mm from the specimen axis.
test specimen.
tive r e s u l t s using the two test devices are presented i n Figure 4.9.
states.
90
required for general stress path tests with the HCT device. In order to
(ASTM C-109) and Erksak sand. Both are uniform, medium, predominantly
Erksak sand was made available through the courtesy of Gulf Canada
io% feldspar
(plagioclase)
10% others
97
sand were performed after removing the fines by washing with a large
quantity of water.
carried out on Ottawa sand and only a limited number on Erksak sand.
Both sands were recycled among the various HCT t e s t s . This was done on
the presumption that the predominantly quartz grains would not suffer
degradation under the moderate stress levels used i n the testing program.
It can be noted from Table 4.1 that the grain shape of both sands
(and edges) and the average curvature of the grain (Wadell, 1935); and
(2) Sphericity, defined as the cube root of the r a t i o between the volume
(Krurabein, 1941).*
values between zero and unity for both roundness and sphericity.
between the two sands used i s the greater angularity (lower values of
chapter.
loading phases for each test were applied i s presented i n Table 4.2.
CT= 300 kPa
m
N
max
A B
50 3 0 0 or ( k P a ) o
AB =Cf' — p
has
e
a) P o - test
m
BC = R - p
has
e
25 a
AB = R- phase
b) b - test BC
CD
= or -
=G' - m
phase
phase
DED = b - phase
AB = R- phase
c) OC - test BC
CD
= b -
=(J' - m
phase
phase
DED -<X- phase 0" (kPa)
m
R-phase (shear)
R-Tests o^-phase
(Consolidation) b a(deg) R - o|/o)
Rl 0.0 45
R2 0.3
R3 o' - 50 to 0 R'1-0 to R^
g
< ID
C/l RA 300 kPa 15
< R5 34% 0.5 20
<
P
© R6 (R - 1.0) 30
R7 45
R8 55 to
R9 0.8 . 45
b-phases
b-Tests D
r R-phase o-phase o^-phase
bl b2
B2 — o m - 50 to b«0 to 0.5
34% b-0^1-0
B3 R=1.0 to 2.0 o=0 to 25* 300 kPa
(-
o B4 a-0 to 45°
a-phases
a-Tests D
r R-phase b-phase o^-phase
al a2
a2 — a-O»60*-0°
a3 34% R-1.0 to 2.0 b«0.0 to 0.3 o' « a-O-eO'-O"
OKVS
m
a4 50 to a«0-.60*-0°
o5 R-1.0 to 3.0 300 kPa a=0-55 -0° a-0-55"-0
6 c
OTT
all a=0->-45*
50%
al2 u
m
R=1.0 to 2.0
AND
al3 50 to a-0—45*
u> 25% b-0.0 to 0.5 a-0-60 -0o
within each phase were made small (e.g., changes i n a or R were con-
CHAPTER 5
5.1 INTRODUCTION
stress r o t a t i o n .
(e l f e,
3 e ) are also examined.
3 These provide a s i g n i f i c a n t insight into
loading. I d e n t i c a l p r i n c i p a l strains e =e =e
1 2 3 (or e ,= 3 e ) would be
x
103
h o r i z o n t a l than i n the v e r t i c a l d e p o s i t i o n d i r e c t i o n ( i . e . e = e. =
r
r 8
1.75 e ), which i s t y p i c a l of cross-anisotropic granular materials (Oda,
z
1972; Arthur & Menzies, 1972). Due to the l i n e a r i t y of the s t r a i n path,
Stress-Strain Behaviour
In t h i s t h e s i s , p o s i t i v e v a l u e s of a correspond to an anti-clockwise
application of torque Tjj at the base of the HCT specimen.
104
were not recorded for every load increment, i n order to cut down the test
R values.
values of a.
Chapter 3). Two aspects may be pointed out from the data i n Figures 5.2
D r = 36 % : <T
m = 300 kPa : b= 0.5 (a)
Miura (1985) i n HCT tests on dense pluviated sand (Fig. 5.4). In this
*m
s t r e s s e s and are thus i n c l i n e d at an angle i = 45° - • j - to the d i r e c t i o n
R-l
o f o, . i s the m o b i l i z e d f r i c t i o n angle ( s i n 4' = zr-r). Due to the
1
m ° T
ra R+l
expected to be observed when the mobilized and the bedding planes are
the medium-loose sand, the rate of contraction i s seen to depend not only
to such a conclusion.
Direction of S t r a i n Increment
i s such that a ^ £ > a i n a l l HCT tests reported herein. This implies that
principal stress axes coincide with axes of cross anisotropy and thus
tests with a > 45°, they observed an opposite trend, with < a even at
90
80
70
V)
QJ
if 60 H
50 -
8 40 -
S 30-
20 -
10 -
1.0
S t r a i n Paths
are replotted for 3 selected tests with an enlarged scale. The initial
linear strain paths were observed i n the other two principal strain
spaces ( e l t e ) and ( e , e ) .
a a 3 Figure 5.6(c) shows the paths i n the ( e , a
regardless of o' l e v e l .
m
5.2.3 Conclusions
directions.
out under drained conditions (Sayao and Vaid, 1989b). Throughout each
and o'.
m
R - I
R +1
Stress-Strain Behaviour
After the f i r s t forward r o t a t i o n phase, the stress path moves beneath the
D i r e c t i o n of Strain Increment
Symes et a l . (1988).
ment with the indications of Symes et a l . (1988) who maintain that the BS
remains symmetric about the a=0 plane, a f t e r the sand has been subjected
Stress-Strain Behaviour
with r e l a t i v e density.
D i r e c t i o n of S t r a i n Increment
F i g u r e 5.11 E f f e c t of R e l a t i v e D e n s i t y on S t r a i n Increment
D i r e c t i o n s During P r i n c i p a l S t r e s s R o t a t i o n .
i n smaller deviations between a, and a, than f o r the loose sand (Fig.
do de
5.11). The r e s u l t s i n t h i s figure show directions of stress and s t r a i n
Stress-Strain Behaviour
on two medium loose (D = 34%) specimens that have i d e n t i c a l R=2 and b=0,
r
(a-phase) and cx2 i n Table 4.2. Test results are shown f o r forward rota-
tion (a=0 to 45°). Much large volumetric and shear s t r a i n s are induced
D i r e c t i o n of S t r a i n Increment
F i g u r e 5.12 E f f e c t o f E f f e c t i v e C o n f i n i n g S t r e s s on S t r a i n
Development Due t o P r i n c i p a l S t r e s s R o t a t i o n .
126
Ottawa sand
1 I 1 1 1 1 f
0 20 40 60
Rotation Angle oc °
F i g u r e 5.13 E f f e c t of E f f e c t i v e C o n f i n i n g S t r e s s on S t r a i n
Increment D i r e c t i o n s D u r i n g P r i n c i p a l S t r e s s
Rotation.
127
Stress-Strain Behaviour
strains.
Figure 5.14 E f f e c t of E f f e c t i v e S t r e s s R a t i o on S t r a i n
Development Due t o P r i n c i p a l S t r e s s R o t a t i o n .
129
F i g u r e 5.15 E f f e c t of E f f e c t i v e S t r e s s R a t i o on S t r a i n
Increment D i r e c t i o n s D u r i n g P r i n c i p a l S t r e s s
Rotation.
130
Stress-Strain Behaviour
D i r e c t i o n of S t r a i n Increment
stress rotation e f f e c t s .
131
F i g u r e 5.16 E f f e c t of I n t e r m e d i a t e S t r e s s Parameter on S t r a i n
Development Due to P r i n c i p a l S t r e s s R o t a t i o n . .
132
F i g u r e 5.17 E f f e c t of I n t e r m e d i a t e S t r e s s Parameter on
S t r a i n Increment D i r e c t i o n s D u r i n g P r i n c i p a l
Stress Rotation.
133
The conclusions drawn from Figures 5.16 and 5.17 have important
or 3.0, mean e f f e c t i v e stress o' = 300 kPa and intermediate stress para-
m
E f f e c t of Relative Density
Rotation Angle OC °
F i g u r e 5.18 S t r a i n Development Due to P r i n c i p a l Stress Rotation
on Erksak Sand: E f f e c t of D .
135
discussed.
Only small differences may be noted between the two densities, tends
E f f e c t of P r i n c i p a l Stress Ratio
rotation (Fig. 5.14) are not observed with Erksak sand (Fig. 5.20). The
0 20 40
Rotation Angle OC °
F i g u r e 5.20 S t r a i n Development Due to P r i n c i p a l S t r e s s Rotation
on Erksak S and: E f f e c t of S t r e s s R a t i o .
138
l e v e l s of stress r a t i o .
5.3.7 Conclusions
with the l e v e l of R.
p r i n c i p a l stress rotations.
major stress increment during the first forward rotation on either side
of the vertical. This was associated with strains that were predomi-
F i g u r e 5.21 S t r a i n Increment D i r e c t i o n s D u r i n g P r i n c i p a l S t r e s s
R o t a t i o n on Erlcsak. Sand; E f f e c t of S t r e s s R a t i o .
140
examined i n d e t a i l .
141
Stress-Strain Behaviour
and (b). I t may be noted that the deformation response of sand due to
conditions.
al. (1982) for dense sand at a = 45°. However, they report the s t i f f e s t
in Fig. 5.22(b).
D i r e c t i o n of Strain Increment
55 - r
Ottawa sand
CT = 300 kPa b = 0
m
53 H D = 34 % b = 0.3
r
v/ — ^ V v. b = 0.8
49
Co
•8 4 7
H X..A
a = 45
45
43 — I —
1.0 1.4 1.8 2.2
—r—
2.6 3.4
3.0
R - CT; /a 3
Strain Paths
(within the range 50 to 500 kPa) has been reported not to a f f e c t the
1984).
plane s t r a i n problems.
146
Stress-Strain Behaviour
d i r e c t i o n o.
b-loading have been observed to be lower for denser sand (Sayao and Vaid,
D i r e c t i o n of S t r a i n Increment
and e 3 are confined i n the plane of the specimen wall (Fig. 5.26b).
b-loading.
Strain Paths
ity i n the s t r a i n paths may be noted for the tests with a > 0. This i s
F i g u r e 5.2 7 D i r e c t i o n of I n t e r m e d i a t e S t r a i n Increment
During b-Tests.
151
0.4
D r = 34 % ; CT = 300 kPa ; R = 2
m
0.3 H
0.2 -i
0.1 -A • a = 0
0 a = 25
a = 45
0.0
0.0
-0.02 H
-0.04 H
-0.06 -4
Ottawa
sand
-0.08 I 1 1 1 — i i i i 1 1 1 —
-0.26 -0.22 -0.18 -0.14 -0.10 -0.06 -0.02
£ o (%)
of the s t r a i n paths.
formities within the specimen wall (see chapter 3) may have contributed
5.A.3 Conclusions
geotechnical p r a c t i c e .
153
within the HCT specimen. The study i s then extended to other initial
CT' (Wo)
Ao .
m
Direction of S t r a i n Increment
90 -
Dr = 34 % ; R = 2.0 ; b = 0
80 -
Ottawa sand
70 -
degi"ees )
60 -
50 - o
Q
75 0 £>
40 - a = 45°
UJ
TJ 30 - •
~~ B • n
20 - a = 25°
10 -
0 -
u
I . I i . i - 1 I
100 200 300
c
(J ' ( kPa )
S t r a i n Paths
section.
E f f e c t of Relative Density
relative density.
0.8 -
D r = 20%
33%
0.6 -
(t>)
X
D
^ E
0.4 -
/O-^ 60%
0.2 -
0.0 -
W i • i 1 1 1 •
C
100 200 300
Cm ( kPa )
Figure 5.33 Effect of D on Strain Development Due
r
to Proportional Loading.
162
Figure 5.34 E f f e c t of D
r on S t r a i n Paths During
Proportional Loading.
163
Negussey (1984).
tially linear strain paths, which are an indication that the initial
experienced by the loose sand tend to induce a small but gradual change
This i s probably due to the fact that these studies were carried out i n
the t r i a x i a l device, where uniform sand specimens looser than about 30%
section.
axisymmetric to plane s t r a i n .
on b-value.
0.5, may be attributed to two main factors: the stress system imposed to
E f f e c t of Stress Ratio
0.0
-0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0
( % )
5.5.3 Conclusions
Ottawa sand are highly dependent on the i n i t i a l stress and density condi-
tions. At a g i v e n
o ' - l e v e l , deformations are observed to increase with
ra
decrease i n D and increase i n a, b and R.
r '
Examination of p r i n c i p a l s t r a i n paths suggest that the sand's inher-
part of their preparation and set-up phase. During loading only one
171
stress parameter was varied while others were held constant. Observed
depend on both the previous stress history and the subsequent stress
factors was the primary objective of two additional series of HCT tests
common loading paths after being brought to the same initial state
Shear Loading
o' = 300 kPa, R = 2.0, b = 0.5 and a = 45°. This i n i t i a l stress state
m
172
Identical shearing stress paths (IF = I'F') were then imposed, under
c o n s t a n t o', b and o. It should be pointed out that 0 and 0' are points
m
from R = 2.0 to 2.4 along the common path (IF or I'F'), specimen T2 again
stress increment vector i n general stress space does not suffer a change
173
tTJ^ = 3 0 0 kPa
D r = 36 %
P r i n c i p a l Stress Rotation
i n section 5.5.
r o t a t i o n of p r i n c i p a l stress d i r e c t i o n s .
values (R = 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0), one drained rotation cycle (a = 0 •+ 60° -*
5.6.3 Conclusions
CHAPTER 6
the only device that enables independent control of four stress para-
tropic materials.
changes i n other stress parameters. Where HCT devices have been used,
c y l i n d r i c a l specimens.
a^ ) , f o r a l l l o a d i n g
o conditions other than the v e r t i c a l compression.
constant R, o ' and o has been evaluated for the f i r s t time. Test r e s u l t s
m
r e l a t i v e l y small i n magnitude.
the importance of duplicating not only the stress path during loading,
of stress path t e s t i n g .
184
REFERENCES
Alarcon, A, Chameau, J.L. and Leonards, G.A. (1986). "A New Apparatus
for Investigating the Stress-Strain C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of Sands", Geotech.
Testing Journal, ASTM, V o l . 9, No. 4, pp. 204-212.
Anderson, W.F., Pyrah, I.C., Pang, L.S. and A l i , F.H. (1988). "The Time
Dependent Behaviour of Normally Consolidated Clay i n Thick Hollow
Cylinder Tests", Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Rheology and S o i l Mechanics,
Coventry, England, pp. 204-218.
Arthur, J.R.F. and Menzies, B.K. (1968). Correspondence on "A New Soil
Testing Apparatus", Geotechnique, V o l . 18, No. 2, pp. 271-272.
Arthur, J.R.F., Chua, K.S. and Dunstan, T. (1979). "Dense Sand Weakened
by Continuous P r i n c i p a l Stress D i r e c t i o n Rotation", Geotechnique, V o l .
29, No. 1, pp. 92-96.
Arthur, J.R.F., Chua, K.S., Dunstan, T. and del Camino, J.R. (1980).
" P r i n c i p a l Stress Rotation: A Missing Parameter", Journal of the Geotech.
Eng. Div., ASCE, V o l . 106, No. GT4, pp. 419-433.
Arthur, J.R.F., Bekenstein, S., Germaine, J.T. and Ladd, C.C. (1981a).
" S t r e s s Path T e s t w i t h C o n t r o l l e d R o t a t i o n of P r i n c i p a l S t r e s s
D i r e c t i o n s " , Symp. on Laboratory Shear Strength of S o i l , ASTM STP 740,
pp. 516-540.
Arthur, J.R.F., Chua, K.S., Dunstan, T. and del Camino, J.R. (1981b).
Closure on " P r i n c i p a l Stress Rotation: A Missing Parameter", Journal of
the Geot. Eng. Div., ASCE, V o l . 107, No. GT5, pp. 707-708.
Bosdet, B.W. (1980). "The UBC Ring Shear Device", M.A.Sc. Thesis,
Department of C i v i l Engineering, The University of B r i t i s h Columbia,
Canada.
Campanella, R.G. and Vaid, Y.P. (1972). "A Simple K 0 Triaxial Cell",
Canadian Geot. Journal, V o l . 9, No. 3, pp. 2A9-260.
Campanella, R.G. and Vaid, Y.P. (1973). "Influence of Stress Path on the
Plane Strain Behaviour of a Sensitive Clay", Proc. 8th Int. Conf. on S o i l
Mech. and Found. Eng., V o l . 1.1, pp. 85-92.
Geuze, E.C.W. and Kie, T.T. (1953). "The Mechanical Behaviour of Clays",
Proc. 2nd Inter. Cong, on Rheology, Oxford, England, pp. 247-259.
Hight, D.W., Gens, A. and Symes, M.J. (1983). "The Development of a New
Hollow Cylinder Apparatus f o r Investigating the Effects of P r i n c i p a l
Stress Rotation i n S o i l s " , Geotechnique, V o l . 33, No. 4, pp. 355-383.
Hight, D.W., Gens, A. and Symes, M.J. (1985). Reply on "The Development
of a New Hollow Cylinder Apparatus f o r Investigating the E f f e c t s of
P r i n c i p a l Stress Rotation", Geotechnique, V o l . 35, No. 1, pp. 82-85.
188
Hosseini, S.M.M. and Cousens, T.W. (1988). "A Simple Cubic T r i a x i a l Test
Apparatus", Symp. on New Concepts i n F i e l d and Laboratory Tests, Rio de
Janeiro, V o l . 1, pp. 85-96.
Hvorslev, M.J. (1939). "Torsion Shear Tests and Their Place i n the
Determination of the Shearing Resistance of S o i l s " , Proc. ASTM, 42nd
Annual Meeting, A t l a n t i c C i t y , V o l . 39, pp. 999-1022.
Hvorslev, M.J. and Kaufman, R.I. (1952). "Torsion Shear Apparatus and
Testing Procedures", B u l l e t i n No. 38, Waterways Experimental Station,
Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army.
Jardine, R.J., Symes, M.J. and Burland, J.B. (1984). "The Measurement of
S o i l S t i f f n e s s i n the T r i a x i a l Apparatus", Geotechnique, V o l . 34, No. 3,
pp. 323-340.
Jardine, R.J., Symes, M.J. and Burland, J.B. (1985). Reply on "The
Measurement of S o i l S t i f f n e s s i n the T r i a x i a l Apparatus", Geotechnique,
V o l . 35, No. 3. pp. 380-382.
Ko, H.Y. and Scott, R.F. (1967). "A New Soil Testing Apparatus",
Geotechnique, V o l . 17, No. 1, pp. 40-57.
Kuerbis, R. and Vaid, Y.P. (1988). "Sand Sample Preparation: The Slurry
D e p o s i t i o n Method", S o i l Mech. S e r i e s No. 121, Dept. of C i v i l
Engineering, University of B r i t i s h Columbia, Canada.
Ladd, C.C., Foot, R., Ishihara, K., Schlosser, F. and Poulos, H.G.
(1977). "Stress-Deformation and Strength C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s " , State of the
Art Report, 9th Int. Conf. on S o i l Mech. and Found. Eng., V o l . 2, pp.
421-494.
Lade, P.V. (1975). "Torsion Shear Tests on Cohesionless S o i l " , Proc. 5th
Panam. Conf. on S o i l Mech. &. Found. Eng., V o l . 1, pp. 117-127.
Lambe, T.W. (1951). "Soil Testing for Engineers", John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., New York.
Reades, D.W. and Green, G.E. (1976). "Independent Stress Control and
T r i a x i a l Extension Tests on Sand", Geotechnique, V o l . 26, No. 4, pp.
551-576.
Roscoe, K.H., Schofield, A.N. and Wroth, C P . (1958). "On the Yielding
of S o i l s " , Geotechnique, V o l . 8, No. 1, pp. 22-53.
Saada, A.S. and Baah, A.K. (1967). "Deformation and Failure of a Cross
Anisotropic Clay Under Combined Stress", Proc. 3rd Panam. Conf. on S o i l
Mech. and Found. Eng., V o l . 1, pp. 67-88.
Sayao, A.S.F. and Vaid, Y.P. (1988a). "Stress Path Testing i n a Hollow
Cylinder Torsional Device", Symp. on New Concepts i n F i e l d and Laboratory
Tests, Rio de Janeiro, V o l . 1, pp. 107-119.
Shibuya, S. and Hight, D.W. (1987). "A Bounding Surface for Granular
Materials", S o i l s and Foundations, V o l . 27, No. 4, pp. 123-136.
193
Sture, S., Ko, H.Y., Budiman, J.S. and Ontuna, A.K. (1985). "Development
and Application of a D i r e c t i o n a l Shear C e l l " , Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on
S o i l Mech. and Found. Eng., V o l . 2, pp. 1061-1064.
Sture, S., Budiman, J.S., Ontuna, A.K. and Ko, H.Y. (1987). "Directional
Shear C e l l Experiments on a Dry Cohesionless S o i l " , Geotechnical Testing
Journal, ASTM, V o l . 10, No. 2, pp. 71-79.
Symes, M.J., Gens, A. and Hight, D.W. (1984). "Undrained Anisotropy and
P r i n c i p a l Stress Rotation i n Saturated Sand", Geotechnique, V o l . 34, No.
1, pp. 11-27.
Symes, M.J., Shibuya, S., Hight, D.W. and Gens, A. (1985). "Liquefaction
with C y c l i c P r i n c i p a l Stress Rotation", Proc. 11th Int. Conf, on S o i l
Mech. and Found. Eng., V o l . 4, pp. 1919-1922.
Tatsuoka, F., Sonoda, S., Hara, K., Fukushima, S. and Pradhan, T.B.
(1986). " F a i l u r e and Deformation of Sand i n Torsional Shear", S o i l s and
Foundations, V o l . 26, No. 4, pp. 79-97.
Vaid, Y.P. (1968). "A Plane Strain Apparatus for S o i l s " , M.A.Sc. Thesis,
Department of C i v i l Engineering, University of B r i t i s h Columbia, Canada.
Vaid, Y.P. and Negussey, D. (1983). "A Simple Stress Path Analog for the
T r i a x i a l Test", Canadian Geot. Journal, V o l . 20, No. 4, pp. 827-832.
Wong, R.K.S. and Arthur, J.R.F. (1985). "Induced and Inherent Anisotropy
i n Sand", Geotechnique, V o l . 35, No. 4, pp. 471-481.
Wong, R.K.S. and Arthur, J.R.F. (1986). "Sand Sheared by Stresses with
C y c l i c Variations i n Direction", Geotechnique, V o l . 36, No. 2, pp.
215-226.
Wu, T.H., Loh, A.K. and Malvern, L.E. (1963). "Study of Failure Envelope
of S o i l s " , Journal of the S o i l Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, V o l . 89, No.
SMI, pp. 145-179.
195
APPENDIX
soil's interstices.
AV «= Ae • A + Ae •A
m m. s. m s
1 1 e e
Ottawa sand, with 0.3 mm thick membranes s i m i l a r to the ones used i n the