Sie sind auf Seite 1von 8

SOCIO 101  Rise of Socialism

EXAM #1 REVIEWER  Feminism: Liberationist movements of modern


Western history; 1780s and 1790s
INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY: PETER BERGER  Urbanization: Massive migration from rural areas to
urban areas; rise of the Chicago School
“Sociology is more like a passion. The sociological  Religious Change
perspective is more like a demon that possesses one, that  Growth of Science: Sociologists from the beginning
drives one compellingly, again and again, to the questions that were preoccupied with science, and many wanted to
are its own. An introduction to sociology, is therefore, an model sociology after the successful physical and
invitation to a very special kind of passion.” biological sciences

Sociology: scientific study of human life, social groups, whole INTELLECTUAL FORCES
societies, and the human world as such (Giddens 2009:6)  The Enlightenment: period of remarkable
 Distinguished through viewing human actions as intellectual development and change in philosophical
elements of wider figurations: that is, of a non- thought
random assembly of actors locked together in a web  The Conservative Reaction to the Enlightenment
of mutual dependency (Bauman and May 2001:5)  Development of French Sociology
 The function of sociology, as of every science, is to o Claude Henri Saint-Simon: mix of
reveal that which is hidden (Bourdieu 1998:17) conservativism and radicalism
o Auguste Comte: Coined the term sociology
FOUR MOTIFS OF SOCIOLOGICAL from social physics and positivism, which
CONSCIOUSNESS became the methodological framework for
 Debunking: Sociologist is driven time and again, by research patterned after the natural sciences
the very logic of his discipline, to debunk the social  Law of Three Stages: historical
systems he is studying. moments of how we analyze
 Unrespectability: It has a fascination with the society
unrespectable view of society  Theological: Church acts
 Relativizing: It represents the consciousness of a as the main authority,
world in which values have been so radically everything is rooted in the
relativized Church’s doctrine or God
 Cosmopolitan  Metaphysical: Abstract
ideas/forces not
necessarily dictated by
THE SOCIOLOGICAL IMAGINATION: CHARLES religion, i.e. universe, fate,
WRIGHT MILLS destiny, karma
 Scientific/Positive:
Sociological Imagination: the quality of the mind to grasp the scientific explanation
interplay of man and society, of biography and history, of self o Emile Durkheim: sociology is religious –
and world. church of humanity
 Major common denominator of our cultural life and  Development of German Sociology
its signal feature. o Karl Marx
 Hegel
THREE MAIN QUESTIONS  Ludwig Feuerbach
 What is the structure of this particular society as a o Max Weber
whole? o George Simmel: micro-level sociology
 Where does this society stand in history?
 British Sociology
 What varieties of men and women now prevail in this
 Italian Sociology
society and in this period?
EARLY AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY
Events are minute points of the intersections of biography and
 Politics: liberalism
history within society.
 Social Change and Intellectual Currents
o Industrialization, both its possibilities and
Personal troubles of the milieu, public issues of social
dangers
structure.
o Influence of Protestantism on American
 To formulate issues and troubles, we must ask what
values are cherished yet threatened, and what values sociology
are cherished and supported, by the characterizing o Rise of scientism or positivism
trends of our period.  The Chicago School
o The department of sociology was founded in
DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY 1892 by Albion Small
o Center of the discipline in the US, strong
Pre-discipline: IBN KHALDUN connection with religion
 Ideas are similar with contemporary sociology o W.I. Thomas, Robert Park, Charles Horton
 Committed to the scientific study of society, Cooley, George Herbert Mead
empirical research, and the search for causes of social o 1905: American Sociological Society
phenomena (changed to American Sociological
 “Blindly following ancient customs and traditions Association in 1959)
doesn’t mean that the dead are live, but that the living o 1920s: peak of the Chicago School
are dead.”
WOMEN IN EARLY SOCIOLOGY
SOCIAL FORCES  Jane Addams, Charlotte Gilman, Anna Julia
 Political Revolutions: French Revolution of 1789 Cooper, Ida Wells-Barnett, Marianne Weber,
and carrying through the 19th Century Beatrice Potter Webb
 Industrial Revolution and the rise of Capitalism  Chief hallmark of theories:
o Emphasis on women’s experience and  Materialist concept: All societies that have ever
women’s lives and works as equally begun and ended the distribution of wealth
important as men’s determines the order of classes in society.
o Awareness that they spoke from their own o Primitive community  slavery 
standpoint feudalism  capitalism  socialism 
o The idea that the purpose of sociology and communism
sociological theory is social reform o Change is something that is historical.
o The claim that the chief problem for  Dialectical Materialism: historical change is the
development in their time was inequality result of conscious human activity emerging from
and acting on the socially experienced inequalities
CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY: and contradiction in historically conditioned
STRUCTURAL FUNCTIONALISM economic forces and relations; tensions and
 Talcott Parsons contradictions
 Robert Merton: latent and manifest functions o Change is something that happens through
social revolution.
MARXIAN SOCIOLOGY  Communism: characterized by abolition of private
 Frankfurt School property, profit, division of labor, and social classes;
requires everyone to contribute their labor to supply
SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM everyone’s needs; universal human emancipation
 Sociology of everyday life
 Exchange Theory (Blau, Homans, Skinner) HUMAN NATURE
 Dramaturgy (Goffman)  The ability to produce and economic and social
 Phenomenological Sociology (Schutz, Berger, & existence is what distinguishes humans from other
Luckmann) species
 Ethnomethodology (Garfinkel)  Marx is not opposed to work and instead believes that
it is integral to being human
FEMINIST SOCIOLOGY  He is against the division of labor
 Marxian Theory
 Contemporary Feminist Theory CAPITALISM AS A DISTINCTIVE SOCIAL FORM
 Growing new literature on women that makes visible  Capitalism has outlived its usefulness.
all aspects of women’s hitherto unconsidered lives  Capitalists only employ and make use of wage
and experiences workers up to the extent that the wage workers are
useful to the production of their profit. Once wage
STRUCTURALISM AND POSTRUCTURALISM workers have nothing to contribute anymore,
 Linguistic Turn: relationship between philosophy capitalists can easily dismiss them.
and language  Capitalists only care about workers as long as they
 Freud: deep structures of the mind have use-value (extent to which they can be put to
 Marx: invisible larger structures of society and see use to produce something useful that would result in
them as determinants of the actions of people as well capital and profit)
as of society in general
 Structures as the models they construct of the social WAGE LABOR
world  Labor power: commodity bought and sold for profit
 Dialectical relationship between individuals and  Wage: necessary costs that capitalists encounter in
social structures reproducing current and future workers
 Postructuralists: Michel Foucault, Jean Baudrillard  Surplus Value = Use Value – Exchange Value
(Wages)
POSTMODERNISM  Exchange-value is inversely proportional to use-
 Jean Francois-Lyotard, Zygmunt Bauman (liquid value. The more productive the workers are, the more
modernity), Jacques Derrida capitalists earn profit.

SYNTHESIZERS DIVISION OF LABOR AND ALIENATION


 Macro-Micro integration  Specialization reduces the individual to that
 Structure-Agency integration specialized activity and traps the person into that
 Theoretical Synthesis activity
 Do structures shape our actions or vice-versa?  Four kinds of alienation:
 Pierre Bourdieu, Anthony Giddens o Workers from products they produce
o Workers in the production process
o Workers from their species-being
KARL MARX o Individuals from one another

Capitalism is the historically specific way of organizing IDEOLOGY OF POWER


commodity production  Ideology: ideas in everyday circulation; determined
by the ruling economic class such that they make our
EXPANSION OF CAPITALISM current social existence seem normal and desirable
 Bourgeoisie: own and monopolize the means of  Ideology of consumption: consumption pervades our
production, accumulate profit based on the labor of existence – that is why so many people work as hard
employees as they do; they endure the burdens of work so that
 Proletariat: wage-workers who work hard to meet they can buy the things they covet
production demands  Fetishism of commodities: the mystification of
capitalist production whereby we inject commodities
THEORY OF HISTORY with special properties beyond what they really are
 Historical Materialism: history as the progressive
expansion in the economic-material-productive forces CAPITALIST SUPERSTRUCTURE
in society
 Base-Superstructure Model: economic base and  Form of relationship with authority:
superstructure impersonal duties
 Economic Base: economic structure or the mode of  Obedience: to the enacted rules
production of material life in capitalist society  Training required: yes
 Superstructure: non-economic social institutions  Hierarchy: yes
(legal, political, educational, cultural, religious,  Institutionalized through
family) whose routine institutional practices and bureaucracy, technical superiority
activities promote the beliefs, ideas, and practices over other administration
that are necessary for maintaining and reproducing  Iron cage of bureaucracy
capitalism o Traditional
 Person in authority: personal
master
MAX WEBER  Members of the authority: personal
comrades/slaves
UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL ACTION  Form of relationship with authority:
 Domain of sociology is subjective meaningful action personal loyalties
 Sociology: science concerning itself with the  Obedience: to the person who
interpretive understanding of social action and occupies a position of authority by
thereby with a casual explanation of its course and tradition
consequence  Training required: yes/no
 Verstehen: German for understanding; process by  Hierarchy: yes
which sociologists seek interpretive understanding of o Charismatic
the subjective meanings that individuals and  Person in authority: charismatic
collectives give to their behavior/social action leader
 Members of authority: charismatic
PROTESTANT ETHIC AND THE SPIRIT OF community
CAPITALISM  Form of relationship with authority:
 Religion and Economics, relation between This- emotional form of communal
worldly and Other-worldly relationship
 “…the earning of money within modern economic  Obedience: to the charismatic
order is…the result and the expression of virtue and leader
proficiency in a calling…duty in a calling, is what is  Training required: no
most characteristic of the social ethic of capitalist  Hierarchy: no
culture. It is an obligation which the individual is  Charisma: certain quality of an
supposed to feel and does feel towards the content of individual personality by virtue of
his professional activity.” which he is considered
 Economic success is the objective, in which work extraordinary and treated as
acted as a duty/calling endowed with supernatural,
 Calvinism  predestination superhuman, or at least specifically
 Success from hard work was believed to be one of the exceptional powers or qualities
signs of those who would be granted  Routinization of charisma:
 Disenchantment of the world charisma can be passed down from
one figure to the next
IDEAL TYPES
 An exhaustive description of the characteristics
distinctive to, and expected of, a given phenomenon EMILE DURKHEIM
 Ideal types are a useful way of orienting sociological
research, helping us to anchor our inquiry as we go METHODOLOGICAL RULES
about understanding and explaining the diverse forms  Social facts: external and collective ways in which
of social action and social relationships that comprise society shapes behavior
society  Society is comprised of a collection of forces which
 Social Action determine group and individual behavior
o Rational Social Action  Society is more than the sum of the individuals that
 Value Rational Action: occurs comprise it.
when an individual or a group  Sociological objectivity: social facts exist in society
values some ideal or belief such and can be studied
that they decide to rationally act on o Studied through the analysis of statistical
that value, to demonstrate their facts
commitment to that value, o Social fact is defined by an occurrence of a
regardless of the expected or statistic
unexpected costs of that action to  Data-centered sociology: analysis of social
them phenomena is based on statistics
 Instrumental Rational Action:  Social problems (i.e. crime) are normal
strategic, cost-benefit action
o Non-Rational Action NATURE OF SOCIETY
 Emotion: determined by the actor’s  The key task of sociology: studying morality (formal
specific feeling states and informal social rules that structure a society)
 Tradition: motivated by customs  Cooperation as key to social life
and habit  The constraint of societal expectation
 Authority  Army of one: individuals are socially interdependent
o Legal/Rational  Change and resistance: resistance is caused by
 Person in authority: supervisor longstanding beliefs anchored on social constructs
 Members of authority: admin staff
ORGANIC SOLIDARITY
 Density of social interaction: our own action, so that we shift from what
o Physical: actual physical number of people we started to do because of the reply the
o Moral: interaction with more people means other makes.
more constraint to social and moral norms
 Society becomes more efficient and individuals are HERBERT BLUMER
more dependent on society  Society: human group life, an ongoing process of
 Highly specialized division of labor (one organism symbolic interaction wherein we continuously
with different parts working together) interpret and respond to the cues in our social
environment
SUICIDE  Three Premises of Symbolic Interactionism:
 Suicide is a social fact and not just a psychological o Human beings act toward things on the basis
phenomenon of the meanings that the things have for
 Four kinds of suicide, depending on the regulation of them
society and the integration of an individual to society o The meaning of such things is derived from,
o Anomic: individuals are not regulated by or arises out of, the social interaction that
social norms and values of the group, or one has with one’s fellows
social order. Too little regulation. o These meanings are handled in, and
o Egoistic: bonds which unite groups weaken, modified through, an interpretive process
and individuality increases. Too little used by the person in dealing with the things
integration. he encounters
o Altruistic: bonds between groups too strong,
so individuals sacrifice themselves. Too ERVING GOFFMAN
much integration into norms and values.  Society as a ritualized social interaction
o Fatalistic: norms of society oppress too o Metaphor of the theater: Dramaturgical
much and stifle individuals. Too much Approach
regulation by rules of society. o The presentation of the self in everyday life
is the performance of different roles, parts,
RELIGION and routines on various stages with different
 Sacred vs. Profane settings and props
 Sacred  Social Roles
o Beliefs: states of opinion, ways of thinking o Pre-established by society, socially scripted
o Rites: fixed models of action in practice of  socialization
beliefs o All social behavior is necessarily role-
 Assembling community: shared interaction playing behavior.
strengthens bonds o Three things that are happening:
 It would be hard to imagine having
a self that is independent of several
SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM roles you play
 You are always acting in
GEORGE HERBERT MEAD reciprocal relation to someone else
 The self is something that is not already-made, it is  We are always playing some role;
active we are never not performing a role
 I: subjective acting self, is only able to act because  Performance Pressure
the “I” internalizes the attitudes toward him or her o The presentation of self in everyday life (the
 Me: as an object, receives others’ behavior toward individual’s execution of multiple social
him or her roles) = an ongoing task of symbolic
exchange, inference, and interaction.
CHARLES HORTON COOLEY o In face-to-face interaction, it is in everyone’s
 Looking Glass Self: illustrates the self’s dynamic interest to control the conduct of others
interpretive processes. In imagination, we perceive in through their own performance and the
another’s mind some thought of our appearance, response it elicits.
manners, aims, deeds, character, friends, and so on,  Definition of the Situation
and are variously affected by it. o Front: part of the individual’s performance
 Socialization: the means of teaching us to internalize which regularly functions in a general and
and adopt the perspective of others, and at the same fixed fashion to define the situation for those
time the means of our individualization, our who observe the performance
development of particular individual selves o Appearance: signals indicating the
o Family: primary group, first source of individual’s social status and “temporary
children’s socialization ritual state”
o Generalized other: the community and  Interaction Rituals: routinized ways of self-
society in which we live presenting/behaving in the presence of others;
o Definition of the situation (W.I. Thomas): maintain social order; institutionalized ways of
socialization of individuals into a society’s behaving in society
generalized expectations of behavior across o Rituals of subordination: behavioral
an array of social settings displays in which we indicate and recognize
 Conversation of Gestures: humans give significance, the difference in rank or hierarchy between
give meaning, to what they are communicating or individuals of different social statuses
intending to communicate, and these meanings derive  Impression Management: symbolic and strategic
from our consciousness of and ability to manipulate, communicative work toward orchestrating a
interpret, and use shared symbols, language, gestures, particular definition of the situation and a successful
etc. role performance
o What we say (or signal) calls out a certain
response in another and that in turn changes
o Back-stage: staging area for front-region sense knowledge is taken for granted 
behavior, where actors do the preparatory taken-for-granted reality
work to ensure a successful performance
o Front-stage: area where role performances PETER BERGER & THOMAS LUCKMANN
are given  Ordered reality: social reality into which individuals
o Region: any role-performance setting are socialized
bounded to some extent by barriers to o Social order is a human product, or more
perception precisely, an ongoing human production
 Total Institutions: highly regimented settings in o Social Construction of Reality: individuals
which the barriers that customarily divide collectively create an objective social reality
individuals’ everyday functions (sleeping, eating, and whose objects they designate and arrange in
working) are removed order in ways that make sense to them as
 Stigma: society’s categorization or differentiation of they subjectively experience that reality
its members as inferior based on the social evaluation o Externalization: individuals maintain a
and labeling of various attributes of undesired social reality, whereby they act on and in
difference regard to the already existing objective
o Three sources: reality
 Abominations of the body o Internalization: individuals create social
(physical deformities) reality such that, in experiencing an external,
 Blemishes of character (perceived objective reality, they translate (internalize)
as weak-willed, domineering, or it into their own particular, subjectively
unnatural passions, etc.) experienced reality
 Tribal stigma (of race, nation, and o Subjective Reality: individual’s subjective
religion) experience and interpretation of the external,
o Passing: impression management and self- objective reality
presentation symbolic work an individual  Berger and Luckmann’s Schema
must do in order to cover up or secretly o (1) Externalization: man creates his social
maintain a stigmatized identity world by ordering the mass of sense
impressions and experiences into a
meaningful whole
PHENOMENOLOGY AND ETHNOMETHODOLOGY o (2) Objectification: the social world is
objectified and reified through language and
PHENOMENOLOGY discourse. Man forgets that the social world
ALFRED SCHUTZ is his creation
 Experience, Meaning, and Social Action o (3) Internalization: objectified world acts
o There is a link between phenomenological back on the human consciousness through
sociology and 20th Century philosophy the process of socialization
(Husserl)
 Husserl: the consciousness of ETHNOMETHODOLOGY
human beings is intentional HAROLD GARFINKEL
 Schutz: the world of everyday life  Ethnomethodology: methods people use to create an
is the scene and also the object of ordered reality (Greek word, ethos = people)
our actions and interactions o Concerned with sociological theory’s
o Natural attitude: the individual’s orientation general tendency to take social order and
toward his or her social environment, a social processes for granted
reality which seems natural because it is the o Ethnomethodologists are concerned with
everyday reality which he or she knows documenting in detail how individuals in
o Difference between Symbolic Interactionism society work at creating an ordered or
and Phenomenology: SI focuses on the organized social reality
socially structured nature of interaction, o Individuals accomplish order as they go
meaning, and role performance, and not the about their everyday business, recognizing
individual’s experiences of his or her role and making sense of their experiences in
behavior ways that fit with the shared norms of order
 Here-And-Now, Everyday Reality and reasonableness in society
o Wide-awakeness: practical consciousness o Usual organized practices
and attentiveness required in attending to the o Accounts: how individuals categorize
“here-and-now” tasks and realities of events, experiences, and everyday reality
everyday life such that their accounts produced an
o Here-And-Now: reality to which individuals ordered, sequential reality that makes sense
are most wide awake; everyday reality (a and is credible in a given societal context
reality that is highly pragmatic)  Breaching experiments: designed to disrupt the
 Shared, Intersubjective Reality routines that comprise particular social realities so as
o Despite the uniqueness of subjective to demonstrate the fragility that underlies everyday
experiences, it is the intersubjectivity of social order
human life that demarcates human  Conversational Analysis: detailed analysis of the
consciousness and human society specific, pragmatic steps in how language and speech
o Our reality is always social, always shared are used in everyday conversation to create order
with others
o Lifeworld: a world shared with other selves
 Everyday Reality as the Social Reality FEMINIST THEORIES
o We experience and know everyday social
reality as a natural reality whose common-
Why study feminist theories in Sociology?  Lack of  Standpoint Theory: alternative sociology, from the
feminism in sociological theories OR “missing feminist standpoint of women, makes the everyday world (real
revolution in sociology” world outside the text) its problematic (domain of
inquiry)
WAVES OF FEMINISM o Marx’s standpoint of the proletariat 
 1st Wave: West’s first sustained political movement Smith’s women’s standpoint
dedicating to achieving political equality for women  Gender contradictions in society
 2nd Wave: The Personal is the Political (Friedman’s can be apprehended and
Feminist Mystique and Beauvoirs’s Second Sex) transformed
 3rd Wave: the micropoltiics of gender equality;
intersectionality PATRICIA HILL COLLINS
 4th Wave: queer, sex positive, trans-inclusive, body-  Black Women’s standpoint
positive, and digitally driven; use of internet and o Absence of black women’s voices from the
social media structures of power has both defined black
women and exacerbated their oppression
CHARLOTTE PERKINS GILMAN o Different black women have different
 Women’s Inequality localized experiences
o Women and men live in an andro-centric  Commonality of black women’s
culture  man as accepted race, women as shared history
sub-species  shared history of struggle including
o True progress can only be achieved when formative experience of slavery
society transcended its abnormal o Gender x Race, Mothering + Work
androcentric division and allowed women to o Controlling images: demeaning images and
be both workers and mothers representations of black women by the
largely white-controlled mass media and
DOROTHY SMITH other social institutions
 Ruling Texts: core man-made texts which define  Black feminist thought
gender and other power relations in society o Knowledge voiced by black women from
o Authoritative knowledge in sociology and in within their lived experiences and across the
society is determined by standards that different sites of their everyday reality
privilege men and exclude women o Produced to vocalize their experiences of
 Rules of sociology and responses to the cultural contradictions
o Ruling text for sociology: conceptual and they encounter as black women
methodological rules and procedures, texts o Intersectionality: multiple crisscrossing
that organize sociological practices  these ways in which different histories and diverse
marginalize women structural locations (race, gender, class,
o Research or knowledge excludes the direct sexuality, etc.) situate individuals’
experiences of women but it is presented as experiences and life-chances
the universally true, objective account of the  Whatever the source of oppression,
world it is their intersectionality that
o Missing from sociological and other texts matters
that comprise our society’s objectified  This produces activist knowledge
knowledge are the everyday experiences of (knowledge generated from within
particular situated contexts oppressed groups’ lived
 Knowing from within: sociological inquiry is experiences) and empowers them to
necessarily a social relation resist and take action
o Sociologists inhabit particular social worlds
and the people we study also inhabit
particular social worlds; cannot assume that QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
we know and understand what is going on in
those worlds HISTORY OF QUANTIFICATION IN SOCIOLOGY
 Standpoint of the researcher and  Quantification methods help the sociologist in:
standpoint of individuals and o Quantitative modeling
groups o Measurement
 Women’s realities o Sampling
o Women’s phenomenological reality, their o Computerization
everyday “here-and-now” relevances, also o Data analysis
matter
o Hypothesis testing
o The opening up of women’s experience
o Data storage
gives sociologists access to social realities
 Durkheim advocated quantification (using a
previously unavailable, indeed repressed
measurement as a way of defining concepts), Weber
o Domestic world: world of household,
was not enthusiastic about it
children and neighborhood (women’s
 Quantitative concepts do not only mean numbers but
reality) ; public world: men’s reality
can also be portrayed with words such as “many,
 Negotiating two world simultaneously
“few”, “several”
o Bifurcation of consciousness: knowledge
that emerges from the contradictory realities HYPOTHESIS FORMULATION
women experience due to the split between  Hypothesis: proposition designed to be tested in the
objectified knowledge and the public world research project; can be univariate, bivariate, or
of work and women’s everyday, localized multivariate
experiences o Bivariate: two variables = most
o Women who move between the domestic
hypothesizes of quantitative sociologists are
and the public worlds bivariate
o Inductively derived (during prior research)  Quantitative should at least provide these 3 methods:
or deductively arrived o Diachronic (dynamic/longitudinal) and
 Increasing trend of quantitative sociologists turning synchronic (cross-sectional) methods
to secondary analysis of existing data, thus dealing with structure
formulating a hypothesis that includes the existing o Talk in terms of actors rather than in terms
available variables  deductively of equations or variables
 Some studies do not present a hypothesis at all and o Must do a better job of raising R2s
some even have up to 5 hypotheses
HISTORICAL COMPARISONS
QUESTIONNAIRE CONSTRUCTION  Shift from OLS regression to logistic/logit regression
 Middle component of the research process and has a  OLS Regression: uses predominantly continuous
number of constraints independent variables, perhaps with a few dummy
o Necessity for questionnaire to faithfully variables
measure the concepts in the hypotheses  o uses R2 to evaluate explanatory adequacy in
are the variables in the hypotheses explored terms of the amount of variance explained
and tested in the questionnaire? o Uses about 5-10 independent variables
o Sampling/data collection constraints  Logistic Regression: uses categorical rather than
o Quantitative data analysis constraints continuous dependent variables
 Questionnaire must be designed to collect data that o Uses more categorical or dummy variables
meet the statistical assumptions of the quantitative as independent variables, on average, than
techniques to be used does OLS regression
o Uses larger samples
PROBABILITY SAMPLING
 Clear trend in sociological literature towards larger
sample sizes, often gotten through secondary analysis
of already existing data
DATA COLLECTION QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
 1950-1980: data collection was often used using the
Likert scale from small sample of people 7 MOMENTS OF QUALITIATIVE RESEARCH
 Since economics is becoming a dominant model, 2  Traditional: positivism
most notable changes have been noted:  Modernist: postpositivist
o Sociologists do not usually possess the  Blurred Genres/Interpretivist: structuralism,
resources to collect data from a large enough poststructuralism, semiotics, phenomenology,
group and thus rely on secondary analysis cultural studies, feminism, Grounded Theory
o Researchers who want to use enormous Methodology (GTM)
economic data sets must use different kind o Researcher as bricoleur  learning how to
of data and different quantitative techniques borrow from many different disciplines
 Technique of choice for large  Crisis of Representation: methodological diaspora
economic data sets is logistic  Postmodern: experimental and new ethnographies
regression  statistical method for moment
analyzing data with 2+ independent  Post-experimental inquiry
a
 variables where there can only be 2 QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
possible outcomes  Different epistemologies across different moments in
qualitative research – the challenge to incorporate
MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY new developments in theory (postcolonialism,
 Inferential Statistics postmodernism, feminism, narrative/linguistic turn,
 Mathematical Models cultural turn)
o Very difficult to apply and test empirically  Cultural turn: interest in the experience of being in
 Difference between method and methodology society, in culture, as opposed to studying structural,
(Rudner): aggregate forms of sociality. That is, the introduction
o Methods are techniques for gathering data of the term cultural suggests an appreciation of the
o Methodologies are criteria for acceptance lived-ness of lives, drawing attention to the material,
and rejection of hypothesis representational and relational practices through
which subjects chart their paths
STATISTICAL SOCIOLOGY: FOUR TYPES/LEVELS  Has faces resistance, wherein qualitative researchers
OF DATA are merely “journalists” or “soft scientists”, their
 Nominal: non-hierarchical categories; i.e. sex, course work often being called unscientific and fiction
in college, brand of cellphone
 Ordinal: ranked nominal variables, cannot be added, QUEERING THE INQUIRY: the sensibilities of
subtracted, multiplied, or divided; i.e. attitude and interviewing are altered with the changing social phenomena
opinion scales, social class that constitute the interviewee
 Interval: characteristics of both nominal and ordinal,
distances between scores in terms of equal units; i.e. READING HISTORY
temperature, age  First, each of the earlier historical moments is still
 Ratio: interval variables with absolute zero; i.e. operating in the present, either as a legacy or as a set
income of practices that researchers continue to follow.
 Second, an embarrassment of choices now
METHOD AND THEORY characterizes the field of qualitative research. There
 Have been divided within the past 40 years have never been so many paradigms, strategies of
 Kemeny and Snell (1962) state that theory is derived inquiry, or methods of analysis to draw upon and
through observation and empirical research and then utilize.
uses quantitative models to deduce the hypotheses
from the theory
 Third, we are in a moment of discovery and o Local, relative, co-constructed realities,
rediscovery, as new ways of looking, interpreting, subjective objectivity, relativism
arguing and writing are debated and discussed. o Co-created multiple realities and truths
 Fourth, the qualitative research act can no longer be o Often Qualitative and/or Quantitative
viewed from within a neutral or objective positivist  Critical Theory
perspective. o Emancipate
o Historical/virtual realism shaped by outside
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH AS A PROCESS forces, material subjectivity
Three interconnected activities: o Findings are based on values, local examples
 Theory/Ontology = framework of truth
 Method/Epistemology = specific set of questions o Usually qualitative, but also quantitative
 Analysis/Methodology = how to answer the set of
 Pragmatism
questions
o Dialectic
 Operationalized:
o Constructed based on world we live in and
o Ontology-Interpretivist Constructivist
explanations that produce the best desire
Paradigm: Researcher and social world
outcomes
impact each other. Multiple interpretations
o Objective and subjective points of view
of reality.
o Epistemologic Approach: Subjectivity – I o Qualitative and Quantitative
influence my data collection and analysis;
the nature of learning is part of my FOUR ISSUES
epistemology  Crisis of representation: Who is the Other?
o Reflexivity: How do I influence my research  Crisis of legitimization
o These two speak about the authority we
data analysis?
o Positionality: Who am I in relation to the claim for our texts
 Emergence of Cacophony of Voices: speaking with
research?
varying agendas from specific gender, race, class,
ethnic group, and Third World perspectives
MIXED METHODS: qualitative and quantitative methods
 Shifting scientific, moral, sacred, and religious
are used in combination
discourses: Pluralism, the picture is never complete
 In methodological hierarchy, quantitative methods
are on top. Qualitative methods are taken out from
their natural boundaries and is only relegated to
observation and exploration.
RESEARCH STYLES
 Positivist and Postpositivist (use of quasistatistics)
 Acceptance of Postmodern Sensibilities (acceptance
of alternative interpretations besides positivism)
 Capturing the Individual’s Point of View (detailed
interviewing and observation)
 Examining the Constraints of Everyday Life (directs
attention to specifics of particular cases)
 Securing Rich Descriptions (belief that rich
descriptions of the social world are valuable)

4 INTERPRETIVE PARADIGMS
 Positivist and Postpositivist (realist and critical
ontology)
 Constructivist-interpretative (relativist ontology)
 Critical (Marxist and emancipatory)
 Feminist-postructuralist (materialist-realist
ontology)

THE MAJOR PARADIGMS


 Positivism
o Synonym: verify
o Ontology (What is real?): objectivist;
findings = truth, realism
o Epistemology (What is true?): The only
knowledge is scientific knowledge – which
is truth, reality is apprehensible
o Methodology (How do I examine what is
real?): quantitative – primarily experimental
 Post-Positivism
o Predict
o Modified objectivist; findings probably true,
transcendental realism
o Findings approximate truth, reality is never
fully apprehended
o Usually quantitative – with threats to
validity, Qualitative
 Interpretivism
o Understand/interpret

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen