Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Management of Oral
Candidiasis
a, b
Peter J. Giannini, DDS, MS *, Kishore V. Shetty, BDS, DDS, MS, MRCS
KEYWORDS
Candidiasis Oral Clinical presentation
Immunocompromised Diagnosis Management
Candidiasis is the most common oral fungal infection. Fungal infections of the oral
cavity are caused by a group of saprophytic fungi that includes 8 species of the
genus Candida.1 Candida albicans is the most common candidal species residing
in the oral cavity of humans, accounting for 70% to 80% of oral isolates.2–5 Candida
glabrata and Candida tropicalis account for approximately 5% and 8% of oral
isolates, respectively.5 C albicans is a dimorphic fungus existing in both yeast and
hyphal forms; however, only the hyphal form is associated with oral candidiasis. It
may be a component of the normal oral microflora in approximately 30% to 50%
of the population.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS
There are various predisposing factors for oral candidiasis, including systemic
diseases that affect the immune status of the host, the local oral mucosal environ-
ment, and the specific strain of C albicans.6 Recurrent oral candidiasis is noted in
patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV)-positive patients (especially those with a CD4 cell count <200/mL), and patients
with xerostomia. In one study, oral candidiasis was evident in 28.6% of HIV-positive
patients and was the most common oral manifestation of HIV infection.7 The use of
medications, especially among the elderly population, is one of the most common
causes of xerostomia. Medications that are commonly associated with predisposition
to xerostomia include antidepressants, diuretics, and those that possess
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
tongue papillae. Patients often present with a chief complaint of an oral burning sensa-
tion. The use of broad-spectrum antibiotics facilitates the overgrowth of C albicans by
suppressing the normal oral bacterial microflora. The clinical presentation of an
erythematous burning tongue demonstrating papillary atrophy also occurs in associ-
ation with other disorders, including iron deficiency anemia, vitamin B12 deficiency,
and poorly controlled diabetes mellitus.
Angular cheilitis
This variant of candidiasis most commonly represents a combination of fungal and
bacterial infections (Fig. 2). Most cases of angular cheilitis are caused by both
C albicans and Staphylococcus aureus, and the remaining by either C albicans or
S aureus. The clinical presentation consists of soreness along with erythema and
fissuring at the commissures, most often bilaterally. Angular cheilitis is often noted
in patients who are denture wearers, especially those with an old poorly fitting pros-
thesis. Over time, as alveolar bone recedes, there is a resultant decreased vertical
dimension of occlusion, thereby allowing for the pooling and accumulation of saliva
at the commissures. Thus, a favorable environment for the growth of C albicans and
S aureus exists. Less common contributing factors for the development of angular
cheilitis include nutritional deficiencies such as iron, vitamin B12, folic acid, thiamine,
and riboflavin.19 Angular cheilitis is also seen in younger dentate patients who are
HIV positive, most likely as a result of decreased immunity.20
Hyperplastic Candidiasis
Hyperplastic candidiasis, also known as chronic hyperplastic candidiasis or candidal
leukoplakia, presents clinically as a well-defined, white nonwipeable lesion most
commonly on the buccal mucosa involving the commissural region and less frequently
on the palate and lateral tongue. Clinically, hyperplastic candidiasis cannot be distin-
guished from leukoplakia. Leukoplakia is defined as the presence of a white nonwipe-
able well-defined lesion that cannot be characterized clinically or pathologically as any
other disease entity and has no known etiology except tobacco and/or alcohol.23 If the
lesion does not resolve after antifungal treatment, leukoplakia should be considered
as a possible clinical diagnosis and it should be biopsied to rule out dysplasia or squa-
mous cell carcinoma.
Hyperplastic candidiasis is the least common variant of oral candidiasis and
remains somewhat controversial. Some consider it to be a preexisting leukoplakia
that is colonized by candidal organisms. In other situations, Candida is determined
to be the sole cause of the lesion, given that it resolves after antifungal treatment.
Although many of these cases present as white lesions, occasionally there are focal
areas of erythema in association with the white areas. Therefore, speckled leukopla-
kia, or erythroleukoplakia, should also be included in the differential diagnosis. Such
lesions should be biopsied promptly because of the significantly increased frequency
of the presence of either dysplasia or squamous cell carcinoma in lesions that
demonstrate an erythematous clinical presentation.21
HIV-Associated Candidiasis
Oral candidiasis is one of the most common opportunistic infections in HIV-positive
patients. Studies have shown that more than 90% of HIV-positive individuals develop
oral candidiasis some time during the course of their disease.20,27,28 It is also the most
common oral fungal infection associated with HIV disease.29,30 HIV-associated oral
236 Giannini & Shetty
DIAGNOSIS
The diagnosis of oral candidiasis is often made based on the clinical signs and
symptoms. When the clinical presentation is suggestive of oral candidiasis, the
clinician often empirically treats the patient with an antifungal medication. Resolu-
tion of the fungal infection confirms the diagnosis. Additional adjunctive methods
for the diagnosis of oral candidiasis include exfoliative cytology, biopsy, and
culture.
Samples for exfoliative cytology are obtained by the use of a moistened wooden
tongue blade to scrape the candidal organisms along with the superficial keratino-
cytes. This method yields the best results with the pseudomembranous form of candi-
diasis, in which there are greater numbers of fungal hyphae. The sample is then
smeared onto a glass microscope slide. It ideally should be fixed with an alcohol fixa-
tive; however, it can also be allowed to air dry. The specimen is sent to the laboratory
and stained by the periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) method. The PAS stain preferentially
stains glycogen in the fungal cell wall and thus renders the candidal organisms
magenta in color. Alternatively, a chairside diagnostic procedure can be performed
instead of submitting the sample to the laboratory. For this method, a drop of 10%
potassium hydroxide (KOH) is placed onto the slide. KOH lyses the keratinocytes,
thus allowing the candidal organisms to be more readily seen under the microscope.
The main disadvantage of the KOH preparation compared with the PAS-stained slide
is the lack of a permanent record.
The diagnosis of oral candidiasis can also be made based on a mucosal biopsy
specimen. After the specimen is obtained, it is placed in 10% formalin to allow
for proper fixation. The tissue is then processed, embedded in paraffin, cut into
4- to 6-mm sections, and placed on a glass microscope slide. Staining with the PAS
method highlights the candidal hyphae (Figs. 3 and 4). Because oral candidiasis is
a superficial mucosal infection in the immunocompetent population, the hyphal organ-
isms are noted within the parakeratin layer of the epithelium.
Culture, using Sabouraud dextrose agar, represents an additional adjunctive diag-
nostic modality and is useful in a qualitative manner to determine the presence or
absence of C albicans. A sterile cotton swab is placed in contact with the involved
mucosa, after which it is used to inoculate a Sabouraud agar plate or slant containing
cycloheximide and chloramphenicol. The agar is incubated at 25 C to 30 C for 48 to
72 hours.34 The presence of creamy white colonies indicates a positive culture result.
Diagnosis and Management of Oral Candidiasis 237
Fig. 3. C albicans within the parakeratin layer (PAS stain, original magnification 10).
A sample from one of the colonies is smeared onto a slide and viewed under the micro-
scope to confirm the diagnosis.
A quantitative assessment of C albicans can be performed by determining the
number of colony-forming units (CFUs) per 1 mL of unstimulated whole saliva. A
0.01-mL sterile loop is used to obtain a sample of the collected saliva, which is then
used to inoculate a Sabouraud agar plate. The number of CFUs on the agar plate is
determined after incubation for 48 to 72 hours at 25 C to 30 C.35 In healthy individuals,
candidal CFU counts range from 0 to 1000/mL. In patients with oral candidiasis, the
counts may be as high as 50,000/mL.34 However, because there are no known
established criteria to differentiate candidal commensalism from disease, the presence
of candidal organisms by cytology or culture along with the presence of clinical signs
and symptoms remains the fundamental basis for diagnosing oral candidiasis.9,36–39
MANAGEMENT
There are different treatment modalities to manage oral candidiasis using antifungal
agents. The mechanism of action involves an alteration of RNA and DNA metabolism
or an intracellular accumulation of peroxide, which is toxic to the fungal cell.21,39 It is
Fig. 4. C albicans within the parakeratin layer (PAS stain, original magnification 20).
238 Giannini & Shetty
Table 1
Topical antifungal agents for oral candidiasis
important to evaluate the chronicity and severity of the candidal infection with appro-
priate clinical laboratory and serologic studies. Earlier options involved the use of
a topical polyene agent (nystatin and amphotericin B), and over time, there has
been a shift to using systemic azoles (fluconazole, ketoconazole, and itraconazole).
However, there has been an emergence of drug-resistant fungi, such as C glabrata,
C krusei, C tropicalis, and C dubliniensis, especially during long-term administra-
tion.21,28 Tables 1 and 2 detail the most commonly used topical and systemic anti-
fungal drugs in the management of oral candidiasis, respectively.
Future research in diagnostic technology relating to the clinical and laboratory
markers of Candida colonization will definitely help to formulate an accurate coloniza-
tion profile, leading to effective antifungal therapeutics.
Table 2
Systemic antifungal agents for oral candidiasis
REFERENCES
1. Mohammad AR, Giannini PJ. Oral candidiasis: current concepts in the diagnosis
and management in the institutionalized elderly patient. A review. Dental Forum
2005;33(2):65–70.
2. Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW. Oral candidosis. London: Wright; 1990.
3. Zegarelli DJ. Fungal infections of the oral cavity. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1993;
26:1069–89.
4. Silverman S, Gallo JW, McKnight ML, et al. Clinical characteristics and manage-
ment responses in 85 HIV-infected patients with oral candidiasis. Oral Surg Oral
Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996;82:402–7.
5. Vazquez JA, Sobel JD. Mucosal candidiasis. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2002;16(4):
793–820.
6. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, et al. Fungal and protozoal diseases. In: Oral and
maxillofacial pathology. 1st edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995. p. 166–7.
7. Pinheiro A, Marcenes W, Zakrzewska JM, et al. Dental and oral lesions in HIV-
infected patients: a study in Brazil. Int Dent J 2004;54(3):131–7.
8. Ghannoum MA, Radwan SS. Candida adherence to epithelial cells. Boca Raton
(FL): CRC Press Inc; 1990.
9. Rossie KM, Taylor J, Beck FM, et al. Influence of radiation therapy on oral
Candida albicans colonization: a quantitative assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med
Oral Pathol 1987;64:698–701.
10. Silverman S, Luangjarmekorn L, Greenspan D. Occurrence of oral Candida in
irradiated head and neck cancer patients. J Oral Med 1984;39:194–6.
11. Lockhart SR, Joly S, Vargas K, et al. Natural defenses against Candida coloniza-
tion breakdown in the oral cavities of the elderly. J Dent Res 1999;78(4):857–68.
12. Epstein JB, Komiyama K, Duncan D. Oral topical steroids and secondary oral
candidiasis. J Oral Med 1986;41:223–7.
13. Bonacini M, Young T, Laine L. The causes of esophageal symptoms in human
immunodeficiency virus infection: a prospective study of 110 patients. Arch Intern
Med 1991;151:1567–72.
14. Farizo KM, Buehler JW, Chamberland ME, et al. Spectrum of disease in persons
with human immunodeficiency virus infection in the United States. JAMA 1992;
267:1798–805.
15. Rabeneck L, Laine L. Esophageal candidiasis in patients infected with the human
immunodeficiency virus. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:2705–10.
16. Budtz-Jorjenson E. Oral candidosis. In: Samaranayake LP, MacFarlane TW,
editors. Candida-associated denture stomatitis and angular cheilitis. London:
Wright; 1990. p. 156–83.
17. Newton AV. Denture sore mouth: a possible aetiology. Br Dent J 1962;112:
357–60.
18. Glass RT, Bullard JW, Hadley CS, et al. Partial spectrum of microorganisms found
in dentures and possible disease implications. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2001;
101(2):92–4.
19. Rose JA. Folic-acid deficiency as a cause of angular cheilosis. Lancet 1971;
2(7722):453–4.
20. Samaranayake LP, Holmstrup P. Oral candidiasis and human immunodeficiency
virus infection. J Oral Pathol Med 1989;18:554–64.
21. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, et al. Fungal and protozoal diseases. In: Oral
and maxillofacial pathology. 3rd edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2009.
p. 216–9.
240 Giannini & Shetty