Mendorong mahasiswa menembus jurnal bereputasi

Nasional dan Internasional

An Intellectual Journey of “Know the Unknown”

Author : Kevin Suryaatmaja, S.Kom, M.M. PSM-1, TOGAF-F, CBPA

University : Doctoral Candidate (8th semester) Management Science
@ SBM ITB (Insitut Teknologi Bandung)
Domain : Operation Research
(Information System & Knowledge Management) 1
 Mapping of knowing

Re-Learn
Know Know Know arrogant
•The •The
Unknown Know
Un
-Le
ar
n

Unknow Unknow
•The •The
Unknown Know
Unknow
Learn
stubborn

Unknown Know
2
 Research Timeline: Planning & Execution

Oct 2016 Dec 2016 Jul 2017 Oct 2017 Jul 2018 Jan 2020

Dissertatio
Paper n Writing
Conduct Writing
Preliminar research
Proposal y action
Writing research
Obtain & cycle
Write Evaluate
Literature research
Obtain & methodol
Evaluate Review
Generate/ ogy
Refine Literatures
Define
Research Keywords
Conduct and
preliminar Objective Scientific Research
& Search Research
y study process Literature Methodology
Question Result Paper
Paper Paper

3
 Conduct Preliminary Study
Factual
Problem

Documentation Communication Understanding Learning Process People Requirement Implementa-

tion
Internal “lack of “inadequate
IT Staff requirement change
awareness” management”

or or r
th th ho th
u t
“must focus on
“using Agile
au a au au certain task” “Agile leads

t t
“forced to silo

t
“lack of users

t
leads to “full Agile can “cycle from
Internal IT minimal

igh
communica-

igh h
be achieved if

g h
requirement to

g
SME” thinking

i
tion leads to “need dedicated because focus
Sr. Manager
yr
documenta-

y
wrong
r ri
all team
r
implement is

y
person” on current

y
tion and not understand short, need to

p p
information/
p p
requirement

Co
follow proper Agile” re-learn” “developer should

Co Co Co
requirement” not end to
governance” have ability on
business & system” end”

4
 Conduct Preliminary Study
Theoretical
Problem

Initial study that relates to Agile

Implementation framework starts in 2006,
begin with Rasmusson (2006) introduced
“Agile project initiation technique” and
more and more researcher are interested to
explore the Agile Implementation
framework. Until now 22 Agile
Implementation framework,
Few of them discussed learning process
and human behavior in terms of Agile
SDLC implementation, nevertheless None
of current research are using
interpretivism approach.
5
 Research Topic
Software Project implementation using Agile
Framework with Learning Approaches

Research Problem
Factual & Theoretical

RQ 1 RQ 2
How the learning process How the learning process
impacting Agile Implementation? to be constructed?

Literature Review Component of Literature Review

SDLC (Software
Agile & Why Agile is become focus
Dev. Life Cycle)
Agile &
Agile & Knowledge + People + Interaction
Knowledge Mgmt
Knowledge Mgmt
Knowledge Management and gap in Learning
& Learning
Theoretical Findings in Learning &
Research Gap
TMS Learning Framework

Research Method Component of Research Method

Research
Philosophies, Approaches, and Strategies
Paradigm
Research
System Thinking & Action Research
Technique
Data Collection &
SSM-Based Action Research
Analysis
6
 Literature Review
Literature
Findings

Agile Adoption

Science
Search Direct
IEEE (73) ProQues
(309) t (66)
Agile Adaptation 1359 papers
Scopus
(991)

Review
& Select 87 papers
Agile
implementation
framework
22 papers

Agile implementation 14 papers

framework + KM 7
 Literature Review
Theoretical
Findings (1/2)

Sureshchandra & Qumer &

Soundararajan and Krasteva et al., Esfahani et al.,
Author Sidky, A., 2007 Shrinivasavadhani Mannaro, 2008 Henderson-Sellers, Esfahani, 2012
Arthur, 2009 2010 2010
, 2008 2008
Research
Positivism Positivism Interpretivism Positivism Positivism Positivism Interpretivism Positivism
Philosophies
Research
Deductive Deductive Inductive Deductive Deductive Deductive Deductive Deductive
Approach
Case study,
Experiment
Research grounded and Case Study, Survey,
interviews, surveys Case study N/A case study, survey Case study Report,
Strategies simulation Interview
Ethnography,
Survey
soft-structured
framework
The four-stage
(DATM) combining the systematic adoption (GOSM) Goal-
process: Identify
Distribution Agile (DAM) Distributed principles of agile of agile practices to oriented Social
Discontinuing (SAAF) Strategic
Transition Model: Agile Methodology (AAIM) Agile and conventional the development modeling
Factors, Project Agile pre-
Framework Evaluation, applying the PPT adoption and software method of techniques for
Level Assessment, Adoption analysis
Inception, (People, Process, improvement model development that organizations by depicting social
Organizational Framework
Transition, and Technology) model addresses the issue analyzing aspects of agile
Assessment,
Steady of rapidly changing experience reports methods..
Reconciliation
requirements for
8
larger scale systems.
 Literature Review
Theoretical
Findings (2/2)

Sureshchandra & Qumer &

Soundararajan and Krasteva et al., Esfahani et al.,
Author Sidky, A., 2007 Shrinivasavadhani Mannaro, 2008 Henderson-Sellers, Esfahani, 2012
Arthur, 2009 2010 2010
, 2008 2008
Research Type Operational Operational operational Conceptual Conceptual operational Operational Operational
Unit of Analysis Team Team Organization Team Organization Team Team Team
validated model to Soft structured Pre-Adoption
Adopting Agile A framework to
A Structured make a smooth approach to Experience-Based Analysis using
Methodologies in support the
Approach to transition from a accommodating Approach for Goal-Oriented Empirical
Theory Distributed evaluation, adoption
Adopting Agile collocated to a change on Adoption of Agile Social Modeling Knowledge and
Software and improvement of
Practices distributed engineering larger Practices Strategic
Development agile methods
scenario scale systems Modeling
programming
project of an
14-16 member undergraduate
35 members of the
Domain collocated agile 19 participants N/A N/A N/A course in Italy / Ericsson
agile community
teams Computer Science.
Grouped in 40
teams
Human
No No No Yes No No Yes Yes
Behavior
Knowledge
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Based
9
Learning Based No No No Yes Yes No No No
 Research Methodology
Philosophies
& Approaches

Interpretivism, Inductive, and Exploratory to explore and

understand the following problems:
1. Why IT developer working in ‘silo’ and what is the impact
Abduction Induction
on learning process? How to construct a learning process
to overcome the ‘silo’?
2. Why the learning process of IT developer were impacted
by the short project cycle? How to construct a learning
process to overcome the short project cycle?
3. Why the learning process of IT developer were impacted
by often changing requirements? How to construct a
learning process to overcome often changing
requirements?
4. Why depends on certain people affected the learning
process of IT developer? How to construct learning
process to overcome the dependency of people?
5. What is the impact of depend on tacit knowledge on
certain people affected the learning process of IT
Research Paradigm (source: Saunders et al., 2009) developer? How to construct a learning process to
overcome the impact of shifting on heavy documentation
to minimal documentation and depend on tacit knowledge 10
of previous team.
 Research Intellectual Journey

Research Proposal Proceeding Paper 1 Paper 2 (Palcomms Dissertation

(EABR – Procedia (IJRTE – Scopus Q4) – Scopus Q1)
Q1)
Theoretical Theoretical Theoretical Theoretical
Foundation (TMS) Foundation (TMS) Foundation (TMS) Foundation (TMS)
Agile
Adaptation –
Research Research Research Research
Research Multi Methodology (SSM) Methodology (SSM) Methodology (SSM) Methodology (SSM)
Methodology
(SSM – ABM)
Multi Method (QDA
& ABM)
Suryaatmaja, K., et. al (2019). Suryaatmaja, K., et. al Suryaatmaja, K., et. al (2020).
The missing framework for (2019) Exploring the Uncovering the failure of Agile
adaptation of agile software missing framework framework implementation
development projects. In of Agile Software using SSM-based action
Eurasian Business Perspectives Development Framework research. Palgrave
(pp. 113-127) through Adaptation. Communications, 6(1), 1-18.

Implement SSM w/
Explain Novelty Explain SSM Implement SSM
QDA & ABM
11
 Conference vs Journal

Conference Journal

Networking •Yes (meet people) •No (blind reviewer)

Feedback •Direct (feels •Indirect (sometimes hard
environment) to understand)
Doctoral Req. •Yes (optional) •Yes (mandatory)
Paper Type •Extended Abstract ; •Research Paper
Proceeding
Paper Scope •Literature Review (in •Research Novelty (some
some conference) allow Lit. Review)

Cost •Travel, Accommodation, •Paid for Open Access or

and Conference Cost Free for some Journal
12
13
Journal Finder

13
14
Journal Finder

14
15
Paper submission to Accredited International Journal (1/7)

Nov 2018 May 2019

15
16
Paper submission to Accredited International Journal (2/7)

Jun 2019 Jul 2019

16
17
Paper submission to Accredited International Journal (3/7)

Jun-Jul 2019 Jul 2019

17
 Cover Letter – Journal Submission (1/3)

22 July 2019

Dear Gino D’ Oca (Managing Editor)

Lucy Thompson (Assistant Editor)
We wish to submit an original research article entitled “Uncover the Learning Process
of Agile Software Development Using SSM-based Action Research” for consideration
by Palgrave Communications. We confirm that this work is original and has not been Originality & No double
published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication submission
elsewhere.

In this paper, we report that many of the new users of Agile software development
framework were failing to implement it which impact to organisation performance. What is the issue?
Many authors had proposed to use adaptation framework to support the
implementation, but it does not clear to explain how the framework made. Hence,
the solution is still arguable and questionable, especially when dealing with the
learning process where the epistemological review is needed.

18
 Cover Letter – Journal Submission (2/3)

We propose to use the Soft System based Action Research methodology to Proposed methodology
find a solution to the gap in Agile implementation. This is significant because
the problem that often occurs in Agile implementation is related to humans Why you choose this methodology
and to understand humans need insight into the real world through
epistemological learning. The results of this study will provide direction for
practitioners and academics who want to implement Agile so that they can
do better planning and avoid failure.

We believe that this manuscript is appropriate for publication by Palgrave Explain your paper meet journal
Communications because this study refers to the Palgrave Communications aims & scope
Aims and Scope, which contributes to the social sciences. This study explores
how the project’s team is interacting with each other’s during collaboration
and how the proposed framework supports the solution. Moreover, this
study is the first to provide the exploration of Agile implementation in the
corporation using the experience-based approach that contributes to Novelty
knowledge improvement and outcome. It also contributes to the scholarly
literature by presenting concepts that combine human-centric aspects and
knowledge management that can be applied to learning.
19
 Cover Letter – Journal Submission (3/3)

With the submission of this manuscript, I also confirm that:

• All authors of this research paper have directly participated in the
planning, execution, or analysis of this study; You need to stated this for
• All authors of this paper have read and approved the final version here assurance
submitted;
• The contents of this manuscript will not be copyrighted, submitted, or
published elsewhere, even at electronic repositories;
• There are no directly related manuscripts or abstracts, published or
unpublished, by any authors of this paper;
• My Institution is fully aware of this submission;
• No data have been fabricated or manipulated to support our conclusions;
• No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were ours;
• Proper acknowledgements to all other works are given.
• No prior discussions with a Palgrave Communications Editor or Editorial
Board Member about the work described in the manuscript.

20
21
Paper submission to Accredited International Journal (4/7)

Jul 2019 Aug 2019

21
22
Paper submission to Accredited International Journal (5/7)

Aug 2019 Sep 2019

22
23
Paper submission to Accredited International Journal (6/7)

Oct – Nov 2019 Dec 2019

23
24
Rebuttal Letter as a very important communication process

24
25
Paper submission to Accredited International Journal (7/7)

Dec 2019 Jan 2019

25
26
Paper submission to Accredited International Journal (7/7)

26
27

SUMMARY

• Comments / Feedback / Criticism is a positive thing to improve the quality of the paper
• Improve your paper according to reviewer’s input and criticism from reviewers
• Not all comments from reviewers need to be followed up, respond politely and positively
and provide an explanation. You need to have strong argument if want to exclude.
• We never know, some editors interested on your paper but can’t accept in their Journal but
sent to their references (like my case).
• REMEMBER:
1. Always learn from mistakE
2. Don’t give up
3. Always find a way
4. Persistence

27