IEEE Energy2030

Atlanta, GA USA
17-18 November, 2008

Wind Farm Grid Integration Using VSC Based HVDC Transmission -

An Overview

S. K. Chaudhary R. Teodorescu P. Rodriguez

Department of Energy Department of Energy Department of Energy
Technology, Aalborg University, Technology, Aalborg University, Technology, Aalborg University,
Denmark Denmark Denmark
skc@iet.aau.dk ret@iet.aau.dk pro@iet.aau.dk

Abstract - The paper gives an overview of HVAC and
HVDC connection of wind farm to the grid, with an
emphasis on Voltage Source Converter (VSC)-based
HVDC for large wind farms requiring long distance
cable connection. Flexible control capabilities of a
VSC-based HVDC system enables smooth integration
of wind farm into the power grid network while
meeting the Grid Code Requirements (GCR).
Operation of a wind farm with VSC-based HVDC
connection is described.
Keywords : VSC, HVAC, HVDC, Wind Farm, Grid
Code requirements, Black Start,, Reactive Power
Support, Voltage and Frequency regulation
I. INTRODUCTION
Wind power generation has received a major
impetus due to ever increasing demand for
energy and depleting fossil fuel reserves. Energy
is the critical resource for development, without
which the world will come to standstill. Fossil
fuels like coal, oil and gas have been the chief
energy source till now. However, fossil fuels are
limited in supply and the reserves are
wind farms, both onshore and offshore, is of the
order of only 10 to 30 kg CO2 equivalent per
MWh of energy. This is a major environmental
advantage over fossil fuels, like coal, gas and oil,
which emit around 400 to 550 kg CO2 equivalent
per MWh of energy. In the European Union
(EU), energy accounts for 80% of all GHG
emissions. In order to reduce GHG emission and
ensure energy security, EU is committed to
develop renewable energy sources to the level of
20% by the year 2020[1]. A major portion of this
is expected to be from wind farms, both onshore
and offshore. As shown in Fig 1, in 2030 a
reference scenario from the European Wind
Energy Association (EWEA) assumes that wind
energy will generate 180GW of power, out of
which 120GW will come from offshore wind [2].
While this paper specifically refers to offshore
wind farms, most of the concepts are applicable
for onshore wind farms as well.
EWEA's Wind Pow er Reference Scenario
350
Offshore
300
Onshore

concentrated in a few countries; thereby raising 250 120

Power (GW)

energy security concerns. Therefore, significant 200 75

35
research and development has been directed 150
12

towards harnessing renewable energy sources 100

4
146
165 180
1
world-wide for sustainable development. Wind 50
56 77
113

energy is an abundant renewable energy 0

2007 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
resource. In the last couple of decades, there has Year
been a lot of research and development in the
field of electricity generation from wind power. Fig. 1. EWEA’s Wind Power Development Scenario
While the development is still going on, now
wind turbine technology has matured enough to Wind turbine generators (WTG) convert wind
generate electrical energy from wind on a energy into electrical power. Now large wind
massive scale (see Fig. 1). turbines of up to 5MW size have been
Another attractive factor for wind energy is its developed. A wind farm, also known as wind
cleanliness. It does not use water for its operation power plant (WPP), is a collection of a few tens
and the greenhouse gases emission (GHG) from or a few hundreds of WTG installed in close
vicinity. They are connected to the collector bus
by cables. For instance, 160MW Horns Rev
offshore wind farm comprises of 80 WTG of
2MW each. The proposed 400MW Borkum-II
wind farm in the North Sea will have 80 WTG of
5MW rating each. The outputs of individual
WTG’s are aggregated at the collector bus.
While WTG’s operate at a low voltage level,
typically 690V, step-up transformers are used to
step up the voltage to the collector bus voltage,
usually around 30 to 40 kV.
commutation failure when compared with LCC-
based HVDC. It is not referred in this paper.
The paper is divided into five sections. A
brief description of HVAC and LCC-based
HVDC transmission system for wind farms is
given in section II Prevalent grid codes are
briefly discussed in Section III. Section IV
describes the VSC-based HVDC system. In the
end, section V concludes the paper.
II. HVAC AND HVDC OPTIONS FOR
WIND FARM INTEGRATION

A vast majority of generation, transmission,

distribution and consumption of electric power is
in the form of AC. Hence, HVAC transmission is
the obvious choice for the grid connection of
wind farm. Most of the operational wind farms
are connected using HVAC connection. Horns
Rev Wind farm uses 21 km of submarine cable
and 36km of onshore cable for the HVAC
transmission of. 160MW at 150kV
Fig. 2. Single line diagram of HVAC and HVDC
interconnection of offshore wind farm to the grid.
Power Transfer Capacity (MW)

The electric power aggregated at the collector

bus has to be fed into the power grid network for
transmission and distribution to the load centers
and utilities located hundreds of km away. This
requires that the wind farm to the grid. Cable
transmission is required for the submarine power
transmission (in case of offshore wind farms),
and underground transmission onshore so as to
connect at a sufficiently strong point in the grid.
Though overhead line (OHL) provides an
economic connection, there are problem in
securing right of way for OHL. Hence, only
cable connection of wind farms have been Fig. 3. Choice of transmission technology for different
wind farm capacities and distances [3].
considered in this overview.
High Voltage AC (HVAC) and High Voltage
However, HVAC cable transmission suffers
DC (HVDC) are the two alternatives for the
from the excessive reactive current drawn by the
connection of the wind farm to the grid as shown
cable capacitances. Not only this increases the
in Fig. 1. The figure shows Voltage source
cable losses and reduces the power transfer
converter (VSC) based HVDC system.
capability of the cables, but also demands
On the basis of the type of converters used,
reactive shunt compensation to absorb the
modern HVDC transmission has three major
excessive reactive power and avoid over-voltage.
variations. The three types of converters are –
Presently AC cables have a maximum cable
a. Line-commutated Converter (LCC)
rating of about 200MW per three phase cable, on
b. Capacitor Commutated Converters (CCC)-
a voltage level of 150 - 170kV, compensation at
c. Voltage Source Converters
both ends and maximum cable length of around
CCC-based HVDC is a special type of LCC-
200km. For a shorter distance of a 100km,
based HVDC, with series capacitors between the
voltage ratings may be raised to 245kV, thereby
converter transformer and the thyristor-bridge. It
increasing the power transfer capability to
has some advantages with respect to lower
350MW [3]. As shown in Fig. 3, HVAC
reactive power requirement and lower risk of
transmission is not feasible for large offshore
power plants requiring cable transmission over
long distances.
Unlike HVAC transmission systems, there is
no reactive power generation or absorption in
HVDC transmission systems. Hence, HVDC
transmission is very suitable for bulk power
transmission over long distances. This has been
one of the driving factors for the development of
HVDC systems since the first commercial
installation in Gotland in the year 1954.
The advantages of HVDC systems are fast
and reversible power flow, asynchronous and
decoupled connection of two grids, frequency
control and power oscillation damping
capabilities. Though a large number of large
LCC-based HVDC systems are operational for
bulk power transmission and/or asynchronous
connection between two grids, none of them is
associated with wind farms.
LCC-based HVDC terminals use thyristor-
bridge converters, which require a stable AC
voltage for commutation. These converters
absorb reactive power as current is always
lagging behind the voltage. The reactive power
(VAr) requirement for the LCC terminals is of
the order of 60% of the active power rating;
though actual reactive power absorption depends
upon the power flow level. Large capacitive
filters are used to provide reactive power to the
terminals and filter out the low frequency
harmonics. Another problem lies in the fact that
LCC-based HVDC cannot be connected to weak
ac grids due to risk of commutation failures. The
strength of ac grid with respect to the LCC-based
HVDC rating is measured in terms of short
circuit ratio (SCR) and effective short circuit
ratio (ESCR), which accounts for the reactive
power compensation provided at the terminals
[4].
VSC-based HVDC transmission overcomes
the shortcomings of the LCC-based HVDC
system, albeit at increased converter cost and
higher converter losses.
Before moving on to the VSC-based HVDC,
the grid code requirements are briefly reviewed
in the following section.
III. GRID CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR
WIND FARMS
At present a vast majority of the generating
power plants are thermal, hydro or nuclear power
stations with large synchronous generators.
These plants have a very controllable generation
capability of both the active and reactive powers
within their capability limits. Moreover, the
power system network has evolved around these
machines; hence they go together very well. In
the last few decades several large wind farms
(also referred as wind power plants, WPP), each
having capacities of a few hundreds of MW,
have been connected to the grid, and a larger
number of WPPs are in the planning and
development stages. The characteristics and
capabilities of wind WPPs are very different
from the conventional power plants. Their
operational behavior, dynamics, controllability
and capability are dependent upon the type of
wind turbine generators used, farm control
architecture as well as instantaneous wind
availability. For a given wind farm, the power
generated is inherently stochastic in nature as it
depends upon the instantaneous local wind
conditions.
In the past, wind power penetration in the
power grid network was relatively small and grid
operators treated them as negative load, rather
than a power generation source. They were not
expected to provide grid support. On the
contrary, they used to get disconnected whenever
there were disturbances. The conventional power
houses were required to provide controlling
power to make up for the lost wind power
generation and support grid recovery [5].
With increasing wind penetration, grid
operators are now imposing grid code
requirements to specify the steady and dynamic
requirements that wind farms must comply with
for getting connected to the grid. Wind farms
need to participate in the frequency and voltage
regulation by continuously controlling their
active and reactive power outputs. Rather than,
disconnecting from the grid during fault
conditions, they are expected to exhibit low
voltage fault ride through capability and support
the grid recovery [6, 7].
E.ON Netz Grid Code [7] states that every
generating plant with a rated capacity of over
100MW must be capable of supplying the
control power. Phase swinging or power
oscillations must not trigger the generating plant
protection or lead to capacity disconnection. On
the other hand, the plant regulation must not
stimulate phase swinging or power oscillations.
IV. VSC-BASED HVDC TRANSMISSION
Voltage Source Converters (VSC) use high
voltage Insulated gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT)
capable of carrying high currents and switching
at high frequency of a few kHz for pulse width
modulation A comparison of LCC-HVDC
(referred as HVDC Classic) and VSC-based
HVDC is given in Table 1 [8].
 Table 1. Comparison of LCC-based HVDC and VSC-based HVDC Light [8]

LCC-based HVDC VSC-based HVDC

1 Size range single convertor 150 – 1500 MW 50 – 550 MW
2 Convertor/Semiconductor technology Line commutated, Thyristor Self commutated, IGBT
3 Relative volume 4 – 6 times 1
Mass Impregnated Paper
4 Type of cable XLPE
Oil/Paper
5 Control of active power Yes yes
6 Control of reactive power No (only switched regulation) Yes, continuous control
7 Voltage control Limited Extensive
8 Fault ride-through No Yes
9 Black start capability No Yes
10 Minimum short circuit capability in AC grid >2.0 x rated power No requirement
11 Power reversal with-out interruption No Yes
12 Generator needed on off-shore platform Yes No requirement
13 Minimum DC power flow 5-10% of rated power No minimum DC power
14 Typical losses per convertor 0.8% 1.6%
15 Operating experience > 20 years 8 years
16 Operating experience off-shore No Yes

and vice-versa, it does not introduce any low

Fig. 4. Capability Curve of a VSC on active power (P)
and reactive power (Q) plane [9].
VSC’s are capable of operating in all four
quadrants on the active power (P) and reactive
power (Q) plane as shown in Fig. 4 [9]. It allows
for the fast control of active and reactive powers
independent of each other. Depending upon the
requirements, the VSC can be operated to supply
or absorb reactive power from the grid.
By virtue of PWM controlled IGBT switches,
the operation of VSC-based HVDC system is
independent of the grid strength, it is even
capable of supplying to a passive load and
energize a dead network during black start.
Since VSC-based HVDC uses high frequency
PWM technique for the AC to DC conversion
frequency harmonics. The first characteristic
harmonics appears at the switching frequency
which of the order of a few kHz (typically at 1-2
kHz) and unlike in the case of LCC-based
HVDC, these converters do not require reactive
power support. Hence compact high frequency
filters can be used.
At the cost of more expensive converter
terminals and higher losses in the converters,
VSC-based HVDC is far better than the classic
HVDC system.
Key features of the VSC-based HVDC are
listed below –
a. Fast and reversible control of power flow
b. Frequency and voltage control on the wind
farm grid to attain maximum power tracking.
c. Grid frequency regulation by fast power flow
control
d. Power Oscillation damping by modulating
the power flow.
e. Fast and reversible control of the Reactive
power generation or absorption at the point of
common coupling.
f. Voltage regulation by virtue of reactive
power control over a wide range from
inductive to capacitive.
g. Dynamic voltage stability and flicker
mitigation by the dynamic modulation of
reactive power injection.
h. Black start capability.
i. Improvement in power system stability by
fast and dynamic control of both the active
 and reactive power injection at the point of
common coupling.
j. Asynchronous mode of operation, providing
decoupling from power grid disturbances.
k. Compact converter terminals compared to the
conventional HVDC terminals – ideal for
platform based offshore applications.
l. Low filter requirements as the first
characteristic harmonics is in the order of a
few kHz.
On the flip side, the VSC-based HVDC
system is expensive due to high VSC-terminal
costs and the converter losses are higher than
those in LCC-based HVDC because of high
frequency switching of the IGBT switches.
However, VSC development in the last
decade has brought down the losses by more
than 60% since the development of the first
system in 1999 [8] Liu and Arrillaga et al [10]
proposes a VSC with current re-injection scheme
to reduce the switching losses.
In [11] Weber, has proposed the use of LCC-
based HVDC with STATCOM on the basis of
lower overall losses. When LCC-based HVDC is
used, the losses are lower, and it can be designed
to meet the grid code requirements using VSC-
based STATCOMs at its terminals.
A. VSC-based HVDC for Wind Farm Grid
Integration
VSC-based HVDC provides a flexible control
of both active and reactive power flow, and it
can be controlled to achieve a variety of
objectives like voltage and frequency control.
Therefore, it can be designed to operate with
different types of farm grids irrespective of the
type of wind turbine generators used, such as
squirrel cage induction generators, doubly fed
induction generators or synchronous machines
with (or without) full converters.
When the wind farm is connected to the grid
by VSC-HVDC, it may be operated as a
generator with controllable active and reactive
power. Though the maximum amount of active
power is limited to the availability of wind
power at any given instant, power generation can
be reduced as and when needed by the farm
control. Unlike LCC-based HVDC, VSC-based
HVDC poses no limitation on the minimum
active power flow. Further, reactive power flow
can be efficiently regulated to comply with the
grid connection requirements. The wind farm
side converter may be controlled to regulate the
wind farm grid voltage and frequency. As power
flows through the farm side converter into the
DC-link capacitors, DC-link capacitor voltage
tends to rise. The DC voltage control logic
implemented on the grid side converter, transfers
the power supplied by the farm side converter
(minus the losses) to the grid, so as to maintain
the constant DC link voltage. The grid side
converter also tends to regulate the grid voltage
at the converter terminal by regulating the
reactive power flow. Under normal operating
conditions, the two converters can operate
independently of each other.
B. Operation of the Wind Farm with VS-based
HVDC under Fault Conditions
When there is a fault resulting in a low
voltage on the grid side converter terminal bus,
the power transfer capability to the grid is
reduced. In such a case the wind farm may be
commanded to reduce the power generation. Any
excess power fed into the dc link would result in
DC over-voltage. Chopper controlled resistors
may be used to dissipate the excess energy and
avoid DC over-voltage [12].
A fault on the wind farm side would result in
reduction of power generation or reduction of
farm side grid voltage. The farm side converter
can be regulated to operate at a lower AC voltage
and low power generation.
A fault on the DC link would result in the
outage of the HVDC link. The wind farm will
have to be tripped whereas the grid side will
have to be isolated by the operation of AC circuit
breakers.
C. Energizing the Wind Farm Grid from the AC
Grid
Black start capability of the VSC-based
HVDC may be used to start the wind farm grid.
When the grid side converters are connected to
the AC grid, the DC link capacitor gets charged
to the required DC voltage level. Then the farm
side converter can energize the farm side grid to
the desired voltage and frequency in a controlled
manner. The wind turbine generators can be
connected to the farm side grid when voltage and
frequency is stable.
V. OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCES WITH
VSC-BASED HVDC
ABB has developed VSC-based HVDC under
the trade name HVDC-Light. [13 - 15]. Recently
Siemens has developed VSC-based HVDC under
the trade name, HVDC-plus.
A. Gotland
Gotland HVDC Light (50MW, ±80kV, 70km)
connects southern Gotland to the center of the
island This link is operating in parallel to the
existing 70kV/30kV AC grid since 1999. A loss
minimization program within the AC network
utilizes the power flow controllability of the
HVDC system. The voltage control reduces
voltage and frequency variations so that the wind
power does not synchronize with flicker and no
separate flicker controller is required. Staged
fault test study has demonstrated the voltage
support capability of the HVDC light system.
Installation of Gotland HVDC has improved the
overall stability and voltage quality of the
Gotland Energy AB (GEAB) to the extent that
the number of wind turbines installed in Gotland
has doubled from the number in 1997 [13-14].
70 kV
HVDC to
M ainland
65 M VA
BÄCKS
± 80 kV
50 M W
65 M VA
NÄS
30 kV
N ÄS 2
70 kV
NÄS
Sim plified diagram of the Gotland N etwork
Fig. 5. Simplified Diagram of Gotland Network
B. Tjæreborg
The 7.2MW, ±9kV, 4.4km long HVDC Light
at Tjæreborg was commissioned in 2000 to
demonstrate the VSC-based HVDC technology
on a small scale. The farm consists of 4 wind
turbines of different types and makes, with a
total generation of 6.5 MW. The DC cable is laid
in parallel with the existing AC cable, thus
enabling three different operation modes: AC
mode via the AC cable only, the DC mode via
the DC cable only or the AC/DC mode via the
DC and the AC cable in parallel. The offshore
converter can be operated within the frequency
range 30 - 65 Hz in isolated operation mode.
10kV
Enge
2MW
10kV
Tjæreborg
GB
2MW
8MVA
±9kV DC
7MW 8MVA
GB
GB
1.5M
W
GB
1MW
Tjæreborg wind farm with AC and DC Cable Feeders
Fig. 6 Tjæreborg Wind Farm with AC and DC Cable
Feeders
C. Platform mounted Offshore HVDC-Light
HVDC terminal at Troll.
The Troll A HVDC-Light link, consisting of
2x41MW, ±60kV, converters and 67km long
submarine cables, is the only HVDC system with
HEM SE offshore platform terminal. It supplies power to
the offshore platform from mainland grid. This
system proves the technical viability of offshore
platform mounted converter terminals and VSC-
based HVDC supply to passive networks.
D. Others
Murray link, in Australia (220MW, ±150kV,
180 km) and Estlink (350MW, ±150kV, 105km)
between Finland and Estonia, demonstrate the
technical aspects with regard to high power
ratings and long cable transmission lengths.
10kV
Murray link is used for facilitating power trading
as well as AC voltage control at both ends.
E. Nord E.ON 1 HVDC
Nord E.ON 1 HVDC, due for commissioning
in 2009, will be the first HVDC connection to a
large wind farm. It will connect the 400MW
Borkum-2 wind farm with the German Grid The
wind turbine generators, of 5MW size each, will
feed to a 36kV local AC grid, which will
eventually be stepped up to 170kV AC voltage.
HVDC Light offshore converters will convert it
to ±150 kV DC voltage. The transmission link
will comprise of 128 km of submarine cable and
75 km underground cable before connecting to
the 380kV AC grid at Diele. [17]
F. HVDC.plus from Siemens
The first VSC-based HVDC from Siemens,
known as HVDC Plus, will be transmitting
400MW at ±200kV over 88km submarine cable
between San Fransisco City Center and Pittsburg
from March 2010[17].
VI. CONCLUSIONS
VSC-based HVDC system is a viable
transmission connection for large offshore wind
farms, especially when long distances are
involved. Relatively higher cost and higher
converter losses may be acceptable in view of its
flexibility to ensure compliance with the Grid
Code requirements, facilitate ancillary services
like reactive power support, voltage stability,
power flow regulation, etc. Further development
and competitive research on VSC technology is
expected to bring down the losses and price as
well.
However, for certain onshore wind farms,
where space availability is not a concern, a
combination of HVDC classic and STATCOM
or other hybrid topologies may be evaluated.
When there are a number of large wind farms
in a certain region, VSC based multi-terminal
HVDC may be optimal. In such cases a detailed
simulation study is required with regards to
GCR, possible ancillary services and power
system operation and stability. Further the
stability and performance of the VSC based
converters has to be studied for unbalanced grid
conditions and asymmetrical faults.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The research is a part of Vestas Power
Program sponsored by Vestas Wind Systems
A/S, Denmark and Department of Energy
Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg,
Denmark.
REFERENCES
[1] An Energy Policy Update, Communication from the
Commission to the Eurpoean Council and the European
Parliament, Commission of the European Communities,
Brussels 10.1.2007.
[2] Pure Power, Wind Energy Scenarios up to 2030,
European Wind Energy Association, March 2008.
Available at http:// www.ewea.org
[3] T. Ackermann, Wind Power in Power Systems, John
Wiley and Sons Ltd., England.
[4] P. Kundur, Power System Stability and Control,
McGraw-Hill Inc, New York.
[5] S. Haier,. Grid Integration of Wind Energy Conversions
Systems, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., England.
[6] Z. Chen, ‘Issues of connecting wind farms into power
systems’, Proceedings of the IEE/PES Transmission
and Distribution Conference & Exhibition: Asia and
Pacific Dalian, China, 2005.
[7] Grid Code High and extra high voltage, E.ON Netz
GmbH, Bayreuth, 1.04.2006.
[8] B. Normark, E. K. Nielsen, ‘Advanced power electronics
for cable connection of offshore wind’, Paper presented
at Copenhagen Offshore Wind 2005
[9] S. G. Johansson, G. Asplund, E. Jansson, and R.
Rudervall, ‘Power system stability benefits with VSC
DC-transmission systems’, Proceedings of CIGRÉ
Conference in Paris, Session B4-204, 2004
[10] Y.H. Liu, J. Arrillaga and N. R. Watson, ‘A new High-
Pulse Voltage-Sourced Converter for HVdc
Transmission’, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery,
Vol. 18, no. 4, Oct 2003, pages 1388-1393.
[11] T. Weber, L. Yao, M. Bazargan and T Pahlke, ‘Grid
Integration of Sandbank 24 Offshore Wind Farm Using
LCC HVDC Connection’, Proceedings of Cigré Session
2008, B4-302
[12] P. Sandberg and L. Stendius, ‘Large Scale Offshore
Wind Power Energy Evacuation by HVDC Light®’,
Paper presented at EWEC 2008, March 31st –April 3rd,
2008, Brussels, Belgium
[13] K. Eriksson,‘Operational experience of HVDC LightTM’,
Seventh International Conference on AC-DC Power
Transmission’, 2001.
[14] G. Asplund, ‘Application of HVDC Light to Power
System Enhancement’, IEEE Power Engineering
Society Winter Meeting, 2000.
[15] ABB Web Pages on HVDC, Available at:
http://www.abb.com/hvdc
[16] ABB web page on Nord E.ON 1, Available at:
http://www.abb.com/cawp/gad02181/306c726f332f36d
3c1257353003b91f0.aspx
[17] ‘Siemens to deliver HVDC technology for submarine
cable to San Francisco’, PEI International, Available at:
http://pepei.pennnet.com/display_article/308576/6/ARC
HI/none/PRODJ/1/