Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
e optimised. Two
-
field as a function.of;time at a positim.above the image,plane: rls
0.70,, 0 = 4433,and. @,= 450: The solid line agpin denotes the
FDTD results using. the near-field to. near-field transformation,
examples of six element arrays with high directivities%low sidelobe
levels and large front-to-back ratios are presented. The relation-
ship of the sidelohe level with the directivity and the input imped-
and the line with, the short dashes. denotes the FDTD computa- ance is discussed.
tions made with a, mesh that extends to, the field point. These two
curves. O W K P I B ~ in the Figure. The line with the wide dashes was Fnrmulu&and method We describe the shapes of the curved wres
computed using,the transformation in [3] (eqp I with. thr normal with the same function as in [2]
components ofrhe. fie4d omitreded);Clearlyc~ the. transformation. from
[3] does not produce the comeet near field.
Acknowledgpmo;. Tha auihors acknowledge helpful discussions where y is the axis of the array and the shaped dipoles are all m
with .I.G. M a h e y of the. Gem& Tech Research Institute. This the x - y plane The subscnpt I represents the rth element For reh-
work was, supported in part by: the Jojnt Services Electronics Pro- ability and accuracy, we choose the Galerkin procedure to solve
g a m . under contracts,DGAL-03,9O-C-000,4 and DAGH-04-93-G- the electric field integal equation [6] and obtain a formula for the
00371and by/ the Pittsburgh Supercomputing. Ctnter under grant moment between the nth expansion and the mth weighting
ECS930OOSP.
References
YEE,.K.S.,,lNGHAM,U.,aIIdcSHtAGER. K.:"Time
to, the^ fac-fidd,based, on, FDTD. calaulation
1
AP-39.. pp,. 4 MW1'3,
LUEBBERS,R.J.,. KUNE. w:,,SCNEIBER, M.. and HENBRERGBR. F.: 'A
finite-diffemae time-domnin. near zone to far zone
transformation?>, IEEZ Trans;,.1991, AP139, pp. 429433 @n. dpm eXF4-j.U) rlz,rdJ,
0 90 180
angle,deg
r565/31
Fig. 3 Rudurrron pamrm of away example 2
-._E-plane pattern
_ _ _ _ H-plane pattern
X
X
References
array with a moderate directivity, the directivity increases as the The authors present two features new to the current mode wave
sidelobe level decreases, until the latter reaches some low value active filter topology Bandpass biquadratic filter blocks wlth
such as -19dB for six-element arrays. Therefore, if a sidelobe level quality factors lower than those of the overall transfer functlon
may be used for bandpass filters Allpass filters may be
lower than -20dB is required, the array must suffer a loss in direc-
implemented using the bwldmg blocks used for conventional tilter
tivity. As for the input impedance, we can only select satisfactory simulation
arrays out of the many local optimums. We find that the simulta-
neous optimisation of the directivity. sidelobe level and input Introduetion: The recently introduced current mode wave active
impedance gives results which satisfy only the requirement on the filter topology [I, 21 has so far been shown with first order lossy
impedance or only those on the other two parameters. However, integrators for the simulation of traditional LC ladder filters. In
optimised arrays with greater directivities and lower sidelobes usu- this Letter, we illustrate the use of bandpass biquads for simula-
ally show worse input impedance. with smaller resistances and tion of LC ladder bandpass filters and LC filters using second
larger reactances. This can also be seen by comparing the above order lattice sections. By two series of numerical experiments, it is
two examples. shown how the quality factors of the biquads am lower than for