Sie sind auf Seite 1von 2

Fig. 2 shows a graph. of the vertical component of the electric Then Yagi-Uda arrays of shaped dipoles are optimised.

e optimised. Two

-
field as a function.of;time at a positim.above the image,plane: rls
0.70,, 0 = 4433,and. @,= 450: The solid line agpin denotes the
FDTD results using. the near-field to. near-field transformation,
examples of six element arrays with high directivities%low sidelobe
levels and large front-to-back ratios are presented. The relation-
ship of the sidelohe level with the directivity and the input imped-
and the line with, the short dashes. denotes the FDTD computa- ance is discussed.
tions made with a, mesh that extends to, the field point. These two
curves. O W K P I B ~ in the Figure. The line with the wide dashes was Fnrmulu&and method We describe the shapes of the curved wres
computed using,the transformation in [3] (eqp I with. thr normal with the same function as in [2]
components ofrhe. fie4d omitreded);Clearlyc~ the. transformation. from
[3] does not produce the comeet near field.

Acknowledgpmo;. Tha auihors acknowledge helpful discussions where y is the axis of the array and the shaped dipoles are all m
with .I.G. M a h e y of the. Gem& Tech Research Institute. This the x - y plane The subscnpt I represents the rth element For reh-
work was, supported in part by: the Jojnt Services Electronics Pro- ability and accuracy, we choose the Galerkin procedure to solve
g a m . under contracts,DGAL-03,9O-C-000,4 and DAGH-04-93-G- the electric field integal equation [6] and obtain a formula for the
00371and by/ the Pittsburgh Supercomputing. Ctnter under grant moment between the nth expansion and the mth weighting
ECS930OOSP.

0,IEE 199fi. 2s. MayIYY4


Eler/ronimLrrrers. OJ&S Noi. 19940885,
The. symbols have. the usual meaning. P, is the mth weighting
K. L. Shlager and, G:..S: Smith (Jchool, oj, Ekctricd und Computer function. The fields in the. right hand side of eqn. 2 are produced
Atlanfa, GX 303310250,,
Ehgheening, Georgilr,Institute of: T@cknulog~,:,
by the. nth expansion. With triangular expansions as a function of
U,%%))
x and after integpating by.parts, we reduce eqn. 2:

References

YEE,.K.S.,,lNGHAM,U.,aIIdcSHtAGER. K.:"Time
to, the^ fac-fidd,based, on, FDTD. calaulation

1
AP-39.. pp,. 4 MW1'3,
LUEBBERS,R.J.,. KUNE. w:,,SCNEIBER, M.. and HENBRERGBR. F.: 'A
finite-diffemae time-domnin. near zone to far zone
transformation?>, IEEZ Trans;,.1991, AP139, pp. 429433 @n. dpm eXF4-j.U) rlz,rdJ,

CRAJXXCK. I.J.,. and RAILTON:.C..J.; 'Application of the F,DTD d&&, R


method and a full, time,domain near field transform to the problem
of?radiafion,f?oma PCB'; Wertron. Left, 1993, 29, (23),.pp. 2017- (XI
2wx We. notice. tbar the. derivatives of the triangulac functions are con-
BATH,MA,. MCLQOD. R.R., and ZIOLKOWSKi,,R.W~:'A nrdr and far- stant. in every, segnent. the. second tam in the kernel takes no
field proj,eetion.algorithm for finite,difference time-demein codes': computation. The a b v e , expression is praise and simple. With
J. Elecfromagnefio Wuve,r and Applications, 1992, 6, (l), pp. 5-1'8 carefully desigped computer progsams the array cam be solved effi-
SHLAGER..K.L.,. SMITH, G.s.,, and MALONEY:,J.G.: 'Optimieation of ciently, altbcaugh dmMe inregals appear.
hwttie antennas. for pulse. radiation'; to be published in IEEE. The steepest descent m&od is used in the optimisation of the
T b n z . Antennas Propagat, July 1994
radiation propertjes. The objective €unction of optimisation is of
tbe f x m
M =D - WS~L(SSL,L+W F ~ ~ I F -BFRB P I ) (4)
where D is the directiv.ity,,SLL q r e s e n t s the. sidelobe level in the
Radiation pattern optimisation for Yagi-Uda &-plane and the &plane, which may be defined as the peak level
of the. hi&est sidelobe of the root-mean-square sidelohe. T h e
arrays of shaped dipole antennas fmnt-to-back ratio (FER) is an important parameter for a Uapi-
Uda arzay and is induded in M. Unlike a straight-wire dipole
W. Chen, L. Jen and S. M. Zhang amay, the FER of a shaped dipoie. array is easily optimised to a
large value,, which will sometimes resist low sidelobe level if FER
is directly written in eqn. 4 as SLL. W,, and W,,, are weighting
Indexing term4 Antennua, Antennu urroys, Anlrvlnu rudiution coeacients which increase with optimisa~on,so that the array
putteror first reaches a moderately large. dicectivity and then the sidelobes
are minimised. At the end of the optimisation W,,. is -4 and W,,,
Yagi-Uda arrayp of shaped dipoles are optimised for IOW sidelobe
patterns. Sir-element arrays are considered. The study shows that is close to 0.05, i.e. almost only the sidelobe level is relevant.
this type of antenna array can be designed to achieve not only.
hi&er directivity.but also lower sidelobes and much greater front- Results and discussions: Anaiysis and optimisation of the shaped
to-back ratie than the usual straight-wirearrays. dipole array are made using equal divisions of wire lengths. The
radius of the wire is 0.01 wavelength. All the pacameters defining
Introductiun: There is continuing interest in shaped dipole anten- the shapes of arrays are variable in the optimisation. 31 expan-
nas and their arrays [l-31. Three-element Yagi-Uda arrays of sions per element are used for a stable estimation of low radiation
shaped dipoles have been optimised experimentally [4] and theo- level near or helow, --24dB. Two examples of six-element Yagi-
retically [2]. However,,these theoretical researches concentrate only Uda arrays, with one reflector and four directors, follow. They are
on directivity,.Radiation patterns are not included in the optimisa- selectcd from the many arrays optimised. There, are many local
tion. The three-element array designed experimentally by Ldnd- optima when the number of elements is large.
storfer [4] seems still the best array which makes a coinpromise The structuces of these examples are shown in Fig. I. Owing to
between directivity and sidelobe levels. Generally. speaking, theo- symmetry only, half is plotted. Fig. 2 shows the radiation patterns
retical optimisation will lead to superior arrays with lower of example 1 in both the E-plane and the H-plane. The directivity
sidelobes. is 33.78dB and the.input impedance is 27.61 + j34. 4 9 a . The high-
Compared with the conventional arrays of straight-wire dipoles est sidelohe appears in the E-plane at 49.2" as -23.73dB. We
[SI, the shaped dipole array has more degrees of freedom for opti- notice the very low radiation levels in the region around the back
misation, which can lead to superior properties not only in direc- fire direction. The FER is as great as40.59dB. Although the direc-
tivity but also in radiation patterns. In this Letter, an emcient tivity is 1.35dB less than the maximum which has been achieved
mmputer program using the Galerkin procedure is proposed to with only the directivity optimised, the radiation pattern and the
soke the electric field integal equation for the currents on wires.. input impedance ase much better.

11264 ELECTRONICS L E n E R S 4th August 1994 Vol. 30 No. 16


Y Y

0 90 180
angle,deg
r565/31
Fig. 3 Rudurrron pamrm of away example 2
-._E-plane pattern
_ _ _ _ H-plane pattern
X
X

0 -5 0 0 0.5 In conclusion, Yagi-Uda arrays of shaped dipoles have been


a b optimised, based on the method of moments using the Galerkin-
m procedure, to reduce the sidelobe levels This type of array can be
Fig. 1 Structures of Yagi-Uda arrays ofsu elements properly designed to have low sidelobes and a very large front-to-
back ratio
a Example 1
b Example 2
AcXnowledgment This work was supported in part by National
Natural Science Foundation of China
I
D IEE 1994 17 June I994
Electronics LetIers Online No: 19940877
W. Chen, L. Jen and S. M. Zhang (Institute Elertromagnetic Fields
and Microwave Techniques, Southwest Jiaotong Universit>’, Chengdu.
Sichuan 610031.Peoples Republic of China)

References

1 LANDEXU~FEL, F.: ‘On the optimum shape of linea aatennas’.


Symp. Dig., IEEE Symp AP, Amherst, Mass., 1976, pp. 27.2-275
2 LWNG c.H., and CHENG DX.: ’Directivity optimisation for Vagi-
Uda arrays of shaped dipoles’. IEEE Tram., 1483, AP-31, pp. 5U-
525
0 90 iao 3 WANG. I.H., and JEN L.; ’Shaped dipole arrays with maximum gain’,
angle, d q Electron h r t . , 1994, 30, (5). p p 374-375
m 4 LAWDSMRFER, F., and SACHER,RX.: ’Optimktion of wire
Fig. 2 Radiation patterns of array esamplt, J antennas’, (Research Studies & a s Ltd., Chichester, England, 1984)
5 KAJFEZ. D.: ‘Nonlinear optimisation reduces the sidelobes of Yagi
__ E-plane pattern antennas’, IEEE Trans., 1973, AP-21, pp. 714--715
_ - _ - H-plane pattern 6 RICHMOND, J.H.: ‘on the variational aspects of the moment
method, IEEE Trans., 1991. AP-39, pp. 473-479
Fig. 3 shows the E-plane and the H-plane patterns of example
2. A higher directivity is required and the radiation into the rear
half space is minimised. The directivity is 14.0568 and the imped-
ance is 12.72 + j26.55n. The highest sidelobe in the E-plane. as a
whole, is --27.61dB, and in the rear part -28.63dB. The highest
sidelobe in the rear part of the H-plane is below -27.84dB but the
Biquads and allpass functions in current
radiation in the region of sidelobe in the front part is somewhat mode wave active filters
higher. It seems that the highest sidelobe in overall space of about
-24dB is the lower limit for this type of array, but the front-to- J. Tingleff and C. Toumazou
hack ratio and radiations in some directions can be designed to be
superior to this.
Indexing terms: Current-mode circuits, Active fiters, Wave digital
It is found, by computation, that the relationship between the filtorr
directivity and the sidelobe level is very complicated. For an initial ~ ~~

array with a moderate directivity, the directivity increases as the The authors present two features new to the current mode wave
sidelobe level decreases, until the latter reaches some low value active filter topology Bandpass biquadratic filter blocks wlth
such as -19dB for six-element arrays. Therefore, if a sidelobe level quality factors lower than those of the overall transfer functlon
may be used for bandpass filters Allpass filters may be
lower than -20dB is required, the array must suffer a loss in direc-
implemented using the bwldmg blocks used for conventional tilter
tivity. As for the input impedance, we can only select satisfactory simulation
arrays out of the many local optimums. We find that the simulta-
neous optimisation of the directivity. sidelobe level and input Introduetion: The recently introduced current mode wave active
impedance gives results which satisfy only the requirement on the filter topology [I, 21 has so far been shown with first order lossy
impedance or only those on the other two parameters. However, integrators for the simulation of traditional LC ladder filters. In
optimised arrays with greater directivities and lower sidelobes usu- this Letter, we illustrate the use of bandpass biquads for simula-
ally show worse input impedance. with smaller resistances and tion of LC ladder bandpass filters and LC filters using second
larger reactances. This can also be seen by comparing the above order lattice sections. By two series of numerical experiments, it is
two examples. shown how the quality factors of the biquads am lower than for

ELECTRONICS LETTERS 4th August 7994 Vol. 30 No. 16 1265

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen