Quality Validation of Training and Assessment Tools and Instruments before

implementation:
Pre-implementation review by Trainers & Assessors
BSBHRM602
/ / UOC Code Title:
Manage human resources strategic planning
Qualification Code & Title:
BSBHRM602
AQF Level:
Manage human resources strategic planning

Specific details about gap identified

Item Yes No
and proposed text to fix the gap
Assessment instructions for Candidates & Assessors clearly
identified

Assessment items mapped to performance criteria

Evidence required for assessment is clear to Client

Assessment meets the training package requirements

Assessment tasks are based on realistic workplace activities /

contexts
Assessment tasks are appropriate to demonstrate competency at
the particular AQF level.

Assessment methods used are appropriate

Underpinning knowledge is adequately assessed

Addresses critical aspects and evidence requirements adequately

Appropriate number of tasks provided to demonstrate

competency

Assessment conditions are appropriate and Safe

Assessment items allow for sufficient gathering of evidence

Assessment is valid

Assessment is reliable

Assessment is fair

Assessment is flexible

Version: 2.0/May 2019

Page 1 of 5
Principles of Assessment
VALIDITY:
☒ All Performance Criteria are addressed
☒ All knowledge evidence is addressed
☒ All Performance Evidence is addressed
☒ Assessment conditions are met
☒ Context and (where relevant) consistency of assessment
☒ Assessment methods are appropriate for the AQF level
☒ Assessment tools are designed so that evidence is
gathered over time

Reliability:
☒ Marking guide is available and matches the student
assessment tool
☒ Instructions to assessor are clear
☒ Instructions to the student are clear

Flexibility:
☒ Appropriate reasonable adjustment is outlined to ensure
integrity of assessment is maintained and are in line
with industry standards
☒ Timing of the assessment is outlined can be negotiated if
required
☒ Allows for recognition of existing competencies
☒ Draws from a range of assessment methods

Fair assessment:
☒ Students are provided with clear information about what
is expected of them
☒ Students are advised in advance when and where the
assessment will take place
☒ Reasonable adjustments, including Language, Literacy
and Numeracy, can be made while ensuring the integrity
of the assessment
☒ Ensures students are provided with objective assessment
feedback
☒ Allows for appeals against assessment decisions

Version: 2.0/May 2019

Page 2 of 5
Rules of Evidence

Valid evidence:
☒ Assessment tasks are clear and will enable students to
provide evidence that directly relates to the unit of
competency
☐ Model answers and observable behaviours relate to the
task being outlined

Authentic evidence:
☒ Assessment process is designed to ensure that work
submitted is learners own work

Current evidence:
x Learners will be required to demonstrates current
knowledge and skills
Sufficient evidence:
☒ The assessment tool requests evidence that sufficiently
addresses the full breadth and scope of the UOC
requirements
☒ Model answers and observable behaviours sufficiently
outline full breadth and scope of the UOC and related
requirements

Version: 2.0/May 2019

Page 3 of 5
Recommendations/suggestion with specific text for gaps identified:

 Assessment instrument’s content are aligned to the assessment’s purpose

 The level of difficulty of language, literacy and numeracy is appropriate for the level
of the unit of competency being assessed.
 The level of difficulty of the activity is appropriate for the competency or
competencies being assessed.
 Assessment tool instructions and assessment conditions are clearly identified.
 Written information is worded appropriately.

Trainer/Assessor Yes No Init: Date:

providing review:

Will this trainer/assessor / /

be implementing the

Version: 2.0/May 2019

Page 4 of 5
 tool:

Admin Use Only

/ /
Logged in CI Register: Yes No Init: Date:
/ /
Forwarded for CI: Yes No Init: Date:

Version: 2.0/May 2019

Page 5 of 5