Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
ABSTRACT
There are many methods available to find out the principal dimensions of tug boats. However,
due to the remarkable development of such vessels during the last decades, such methods have
become out of date. Therefore, it was necessary to find out new statistics for most new modern
ships that actually exist or under construction, in order to develop design charts for estimating
the principal dimensions of tug boats. Such charts will be of great help in the preliminary design
stage of such vessels.
Key words: Tug boats, Design chart, Ocean-going tug, Coastal tugs, Harbour tugs, Ship
stability.
TUG Length(L) Breadth (B) Depth (D) Draught (T) Bollard Pull
No m m m m ton
NAME
MOAWEN 4.5 3.21 43
1 32.8 9.5
3&5
MOAWEN 4.3 2.7 30
2 31.6 8.6
4&8
MOAWEN 4.5 4.3 42
3 32.83 9.5
6&7
ELSHEKH 4.5 3.3 39
4 32.8 9.5
ZAYED
4.4 5 50
5 ANTAR 46 12
MARED & 4.4 5 60
6 50 12
SHAHM
3.95 5 50
7 SALAM 5 35 11
3.95 5 40
8 SALAM 35 11
3.95 5 40
9 A.BAHGAT 35 11
4.5 3.8 36
10 FAHD 34.4 9.57
MARIDIVE 3.95 3.35 18.7
11 52.7 11
3
MARIDIVE 3.95 3.35 34
12 53.47 11
4
MARIDIVE 4.6 4 40
13 53.3 11.6
5
MARIDIVE 4.6 4.05 63
14 55.9 12.25
7
MARIDIVE 4.6 4.05 63
15 55.77 12.25
8
MARIDIVE 4.57 4.05 65
16 55.77 12.25
9
MARIDIVE 4.88 3.86 55
17 55.47 11.6
94
4.27 3.65 39.4
18 MZ 104 56.39 12.19
ocean 4.5 3.9 53
19 57.7 12.2
drum
4.5 3.15 20
20 ahmos 26.2 8.3
abu el 4.5 3.84 30
21 40.5 9
abbas
4.3 3.6 25
22 dekhela 30 8.5
yousef 3.8 1.8 10
23 22.5 6.5
elserafy
3.95 5 40
24 BASEL 2 35 11
tradewind 4.39 3.9 33.3
25 31.91 9.14
service
4.3 3 12
26 janus 24.28 8.52
3.66 2.82 19.8
27 w.h.parr 20.12 8
3.6 4.8 29.2
28 bugsier 1 27.1 8.8
3.65 4.75 35.5
29 karl 28.75 9.1
maridive 6.1 4.95 60
30 59.25 14.95
519
4 5.6 42.6
31 bugsier 8 34.64 9.3
greatham 3.55 4.8 30
32 28.28 8.8
cross
According to the above statistic for the tug and the length (L) of tug boats. Similarly,
boats, four charts can be represented Figure (3) shows the relation between the
showing the different relationships between draft (T) and the length (L) of tug boats,
the main dimensions. Figure (1) shows the where Figure (4) shows the relation between
relation between the breadth (B) and the the bollard pull and the length (L) of tug
length (L) of tug boats, where Figure (2) boats.
represents the relation between the depth (D)
16
14
12
10
B (m)
8
6
4
2
0
15 25 35 45 55 65
L (m)
Figure (1): Relation between the breadth (B) and the length (L)
4
D (m)
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
L (m)
Figure (2): Relation between the depth (D) and the length (L)
6
4
T (m)
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
L (m)
Figure (3): Relation between the draft (T) and the length (L)
70
60
BOLLARD PULL (TON)
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
L (m)
Figure (4): the relation between the bollard pull and the length (L)
Analysing of these charts, the following References
formulae may be obtained: 1. Munro-Smith, R.(1975), Merchant ship
types, Marine Media Management
B = 0.127 L + 5.245 (1) Limited
D = 0.0239 L + 3.306 (2)
2. REID, GEORGE H.(1975), Ship handling
T = 0.0135 L + 3.398 (3) with tugs, Cornell Maritime Press,
B.PULL = 0.852 L + 5.153 (4) centreville, maryland .
Proposed Design Method for Preliminary
Estimating of Main Dimensions of New 3. BARRAS, C.B (2004), Ship Design and
tug boats Performance for Masters and Mates.
The following steps are proposed to Amsterdam: ELSEVIER
determine the main dimensions of a new tug
boat: 4. Schneekluth, H. (1998), Ship Design
1- Knowing the bollard pull required to for Efficiency, Economy\ H.
be carried by the new tug one can Schneekluth and V. Bertram BH, 2nd
find the approximate length for such ed.
a tug using the suitable formula (4).
5. WATSON, DAVID G.M. (1998), Practical
2- The other main dimensions breadth Ship Design.-Amsterdam:ELSEVIER
"B", depth "D" and draught "T", are 6. BRADY, EDWARD M. (1977), TUGS,
determined using formulae (1), (2) TOWBOATS AND TOWING, Cornell
and (3), respectively. Maritime Press, INC., Cambridge, Maryland.
3- It must be noticed that the above
obtained main dimensions are
preliminary values and to be مستخلص
rechecked during the design
procedure to reach the final design.
هناك طرق كثيره ٍاليجاد االبعاد الرئيسيه
(WATSON, 1998) ولكن نظرا للتقدم الهائل والمستمر.للقاطرات
Conclusions فاٍن،لمثل هذه القاطرات خالل السنوات الماضيه
The main dimensions decide many of ship's ولذلك كان من.هذه الطرق اصبحت قديمه
characteristics, e.g., stability, hold capacity, الضروري عمل اٍحصائيات جديده للقاطرات
power requirements and even economic الحديثه الموجوده فعال في الخدمه وتلك التي
efficiency. Therefore determining the main
dimensions is a particularly important phase
تحت ٍاالنشاء وذلك حتي يمكن اٍستنباط منحنيات
in the overall design procedure. A quick تصميميه حديثه لتعيين األبعاد الرئيسيه
method based on statistical analysis of the مثل هذه المنحنيات لها فائده كبيره في.للقاطرات
data of existing tug boats of different sizes االبتدائي لهذه النوعيه من ٍ مرحلة التصميم
has been proposed and represented in simple .السفن
formulae ready for use. The results obtained
by the proposed method were fair enough
and compatible with real figures than those
obtained by other design methods.