Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The intent of this study is to analyze the various factors governing stakeholder management in construc-
Received 6 May 2019 tion projects. In general, the construction companies involving in major infrastructure projects mostly
Received in revised form 24 May 2019 tend to have a number of stakeholders. In such situations, managing the stakeholders and getting ade-
Accepted 30 May 2019
quate support from them becomes necessary. Therefore this paper made an empirical study on their
Available online 10 July 2019
management through questionnaire survey taken among various engineering and managerial personnel
(Project managers). This study identified the major factors influencing stakeholder management in con-
Keywords:
struction projects and analyzed them using Principal Component Analysis and Mean Score analysis by
Stakeholder management
Construction projects
frequency distribution method.
Questionnaire survey Ó 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Principle component analysis Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Recent
Mean Score analysis Trends in Nanomaterials for Energy, Environmental and Engineering Applications.
Frequency distribution method
1. Introduction ties (e.g. general public, local community, local authorities) [2].
In construction industry, there has been a strong emphasis on
Stakeholder management has grasped its attention in project the internal stakeholder relationship as procurement and project
management literature when Freeman started introducing the management, whereas the external stakeholder relationships are
concept in his works ‘‘Strategic management: A Stakeholder not up to significant extent as they have been considered as a task
Approach”. Stakeholder management is considered as an impor- of public officials who are going through the rules and legislations
tant issue to be monitored in project management, since a project that are concerned in facility development [4,6].
can be considered as a coalition of stakeholders to create a project Getting continuous support from powerful stakeholders will
together. Freeman in his works defines project stakeholders as ‘‘a help to have more effective utilization of resources and thereby
person or a group of persons, who are influenced by or able to making the project a grand success [1,3]. Good communication
influence the project”. The main participants in any construction with stakeholders as early and adequate manner will ensure effec-
project coalition are clients, engineers and contractors. The interac- tive support from stakeholders when necessary. Stakeholder based
tions and their interrelationships tied between those participants approach helps in tracing the reaction of public and to plan the
determine the overall performance of a construction project. They actions so as to win people’s support [12].
have an inevitable responsibility for delivering any project in a suc-
cessful manner. 2. Literature review
1.1. Stakeholder management The stakeholder decisions are not only for meant for framing
them but they need to be executed for getting desired results. A
An effective stakeholder management will improve the quality mutual agreement and wide range of participation is required for
of the project. Stakeholders are of two categories namely, internal effective application of any decision. Stakeholder participation is
stakeholders and external stakeholders; internal stakeholders the next dimension of this effort to make any agreement to be exe-
directly involve in organization’s decision-making process (e.g. cuted in a successful manner. Adequate stakeholder participation
customers, owners, suppliers, employees) and the external stake- will ensure a positive commitment between various personnel
holders are people who gets affected by the organization’s activi- involved in the project [9,11]. Such a manner, a project can be a
successful and can increase the performance after their exposure
⇑ Corresponding author. and reach a creative. Mutual sharing approach enables the support
E-mail address: npscem14@gmail.com (N.P. Srinivasan). for shared demands and mutual relations among the business envi-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.361
2214-7853/Ó 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Recent Trends in Nanomaterials for Energy, Environmental and Engineering
Applications.
N.P. Srinivasan, S. Dhivya / Materials Today: Proceedings 21 (2020) 60–62 61
Stakeholder participation
Organizational structure
Decision making powers
Employee related factors Table 2
Customer related factors Mean Score Analysis.
Quality performance
Factors Mean Standard Co efficient
score deviation of variation
4. Data analysis
Decision making powers 2.53 0.685 0.342
Stakeholder participation 2.89 0.741 0.258
4.1. General Organizational structure 3.11 0.875 0.202
Quality performance 2.44 0.678 0.154
Customer related factors 2.26 0.687 0.204
The data collected through questionnaire survey are analyzed
Employee related factors 2.08 0.734 0.226
using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences), a statistical
software tool for data analysis.
62 N.P. Srinivasan, S. Dhivya / Materials Today: Proceedings 21 (2020) 60–62
5. Conclusion [3] David I. Cleland, Stakeholder management, in: Jeffrey K. Pinto (Ed.), Project
Management Handbook, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.
[4] D.I. Cleland, R.L. Ireland, Project Management: Strategic design and
This study therefore identified the major factors concerned with Implementation, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002.
stakeholder management in construction projects as Stakeholder [5] R. Ibrahim, M. Nissen, Emerging technology to model dynamic knowledge
creation and flow among construction industry stakeholders during the critical
participation, Decision making powers, Organizational structure,
feasibility-entitlements phase, in: The American Society of Civil Engineers
Quality performance, Customer related factors and Employee (ASCE) 4th Joint Symposium on IT in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Nashville, TN,
related factors. These factors are then analyzed for mean score 2003, pp. 1–14.
[6] G.E. Jergeas et al., Stakeholder management on construction projects, AACE Int.
analysis using frequency distribution method of descriptive statis-
Trans. 12 (2000) 1–5.
tics and the results revealed that organizational structure prevail- [7] Jing Yang et al., Exploring critical success factors for stakeholder management
ing in the organization and stakeholder participation have highest in construction projects, J. Civil Eng. Manage. 15 (4) (2009) 337–348.
mean scores when compared to other major factors like decision [8] A. Kolk, J. Pinkse, Stakeholder mismanagement and corporate social
responsibility crises, Eur. Manage. J. 24 (1) (2006) 59–72.
making powers, quality performance, customer related factors [9] S. Olander, A. Landin, A comparative study of factors affecting the external
and employee related factors. Thus, organizational structure and stakeholder management process, Constr. Manage. Econ. 6 (2008) 553–561.
stakeholder participation prove to be highly viewed factors influ- [10] S. Ward, C. Chapman, Stakeholders and uncertainty management in projects,
Constr. Manage. Econ. 26 (6) (2008) 563–577.
encing stakeholder management by engineering and managerial [11] G. Winch, S. Bonke, Project Stakeholder Mapping: Analysing the interests of
personnel involved in construction projects. Project Stakeholders, Project Management Institute Inc., The Frontiers of
Project Management Research, 2002, vol. 23.
[12] J. Yang, Q.P. Shen, A framework for stakeholder management in construction
References projects: theoretical foundation, in: International Conference on Construction
and Real Estate Management, 2008, pp. 109–113.
[1] Aaltonen et al., Stakeholder salience in Global Projects, Int. J. Project Manage. [13] Zsuzsa Varvasovszky, Ruairi Brugha, A stakeholder analysis, J. Health Policy
26 (1984) 509–516. Plann. 15 (3) (2000) 338–345.
[2] W. Bakens, G. Foliente, M. Jasuja, Engaging stakeholders in performance-based
building: lessons from the Performance-Based Building (PeBBu) Network,
Build. Res. Info. 33 (2) (2005) 149–158.