GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY

FINAL REPORT

GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
OFFSHORE UNDERWATER
INSPECTION PIPELINE
PT. JAYA SALVAGE INDONESIA Head Office Jl. Sentong Asri Surabaya INDONESIA Telp : +62-21-29823846 Fax : +62-21-8770
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

FINAL REPORT
GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY OFFSHORE
UNDERWATER INSPECTION PIPELINE

DOCUMENT NO. FR/20JSI/2019-0

DATE ISSUED 08 JANUARI 2019

JSI PROJECT NO. 020/JSI/XI/2019

CLIENT PC KETAPANG. LTD.

SERVICE DATE 21 NOVEMBER – 13 DECEMBER 2019

LOCATION KETAPANG FIELD

DOCUMENTVERIFICATION

CONTRACTOR : PT. Jaya Salvage Indonesia

Preparedby Position / Department : Signature Date

Bayu wirawasta Report Coordinator
Checked by Position / Department : Signature Date
Arif Sulistiawan Quality Control
Approved by Position / Department : Signature Date
Alfonso Reno Project Manager

COMPANY / CLIENT : PT. PC Ketapang II Ltd.

Checked by Position / Department : Signature Date

Checked by Position / Department : Signature Date

Approved by Position / Department : Signature Date

REV DATE ISSUED DESCRIPTION

i
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 10

INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 11
1. GENERAL.................................................................................................................... 12
1.1 PROJECT LOCATION .......................................................................................................... 12
1.2 ABBREVIATION ................................................................................................................. 12
1.3 CODES AND STARDARD ..................................................................................................... 13
1.4 UNITS ............................................................................................................................ 13
1.5 PROJECT DEFINITION......................................................................................................... 13
1.6 NAVIGATION SYSTEM AND GEODETIC PARAMETERS ................................................................ 13
1.7 DGPS REFERENCE STATION ............................................................................................... 14
1.8 NAVIGATION AND DATA ACQUISITION SOFTWARE .................................................................. 15
2. SURVEY OPERATIONS ................................................................................................. 17
2.1 SURVEY PERSONAL ........................................................................................................... 17
2.2 SURVEY EQUIPMENT ......................................................................................................... 18
2.3 PREPARATION .................................................................................................................. 19
2.4 VESSEL OFFSET MEASUREMENT .......................................................................................... 19
2.5 CALIBRATION ................................................................................................................... 20
2.6 SOUND VELOCITY CORRECTION ........................................................................................... 27
2.7 MULTIBEAM PATCH TEST CALIBRATION ................................................................................ 28
2.8 SURVEY METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................... 31
3. SUMMARY SURVEY RESULT ........................................................................................ 36
3.1 SUMMARY ACTIVITY.......................................................................................................... 38
4. SIDE SCAN SONAR (SSS) RESULT INSPECTION .............................................................. 40
5. SUB BOTTOM PROFILE (SBP) ...................................................................................... 43
5.1 PIPELINE IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................... 43
6. BATHYMETRIC SURVEY (MULTIBEAM ECHOSOUNDER) ............................................... 48
7. OVERVIEW CATHODIC PROTECTION (CP) .................................................................... 49
8. THEORETICAL BASIS FOR DATA ANALYSIS ................................................................... 50
8.1 CORROSION- BASIC THEORIES ............................................................................................. 50
8.2 CATHODIC PROTECTION (CP) ............................................................................................. 51
8.3 SACRIFICIAL ANODES ......................................................................................................... 51
8.4 IMPRESSED CURRENT ........................................................................................................ 52
8.5 THEORETICAL BASIS FOR CP INSPECTION ............................................................................... 52
9. SUBSEA CP INSPECTION PROCEDURE (SOP) ............................................................... 54
9.1 CP STAB PROBE AND REMOTE CELL METHOD (CELL TO CELL) ................................................... 54
9.2 CP STAB PROBE(CONTACT PROBE)....................................................................................... 55
ii
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
9.3 TRAILING WIRE CP SURVEY METHOD ................................................................................... 56
9.4 EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................... 56
10. CP SURVEY DATA .................................................................................................... 57
11. ROV INSPECTION UNDERWATER ............................................................................ 60
11.1 SPESIFICATION ................................................................................................................. 60
12. PHOTOGRAPH ACTIVITY ......................................................................................... 65
13. CONCLUSION .......................................................................................................... 69
14. RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................. 70
15. APPENDIX 01 SIDE SCAN SONAR INSPECTION .......................................................... 71
16. APPENDIX 02 SUB BOTTOM PROFILE INSPECTION ................................................... 92
17. APPENDIX 03 MULTIBEAM ECHOSOUNDER INSPECTION ....................................... 128
18. APPENDIX 04 CATODIC PROTECTION INSPECTION ................................................. 131
19. ATTACHMENT ....................................................................................................... 136

iii
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
TABLE OF FIGURE

Figure 1 Survey Location ......................................................................................................... 12

Figure 2 DGPS Coverage ........................................................................................................ 15
Figure 3 Garuda Emas ............................................................................................................. 20
Figure 4 Location Map of BM MR-05 ........................................................................................ 21
Figure 5 Verifiation at BM SBY ................................................................................................. 22
Figure 6 Screenshot Of Verification Check (Beacon A1 and A2) After Input The Calibration .... 25
Figure 7 Angle Calculation at Autocad ..................................................................................... 25
Figure 8 Drawing showing Vessel Alongside And Station Locations FJM 01 & FJM 02............ 27
Figure 9 Sound Velocity Profiler ............................................................................................... 28
Figure 10 Patchtest Line Calibration ........................................................................................ 29
Figure 11 MBES Patch Test Line ............................................................................................. 29
Figure 12 Roll Patch Test Calibration ....................................................................................... 30
Figure 13 Pitch Patch Test Calibration ..................................................................................... 30
Figure 14 Patch Test Offset Result .......................................................................................... 31
Figure 15 Grid Fly Visualization Multibeam Survey .................................................................. 31
Figure 16 Sub-bottom Profiler Survey Visualisaton .................................................................. 32
Figure 17 Characteristic Data Of Sub-Bottom Profiller ............................................................. 33
Figure 18. Sub-Bottom Profiller Installed on Garuda Emas AHT .............................................. 33
Figure 19 Beam Pattern Of Sidescan Sonar Systems .............................................................. 34
Figure 20 SSS Installed on Garuda Emas AHT ........................................................................ 35
Figure 21 Survey Area Coverage ............................................................................................. 36
Figure 22 Offshore KP.0 – KP.80 Sidescan Sonar and Sub Bottom Profile Survey Area ......... 37
Figure 23 Nearshore KP 80 – KP 105 ...................................................................................... 37
Figure 24 ROV MOJAVE ......................................................................................................... 60
Figure 25. SSS Not Found Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-1 ............................. 71
Figure 26. SSS Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF Curved Line Portside at KP-4.3 ......... 71
Figure 27 SSS Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF Curved Line Portside at KP-4.5 .......... 72
Figure 28 SSS Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF Curved Line Portside at KP-4.7 .......... 72
Figure 29 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Slippers at KP-5 ............ 73
Figure 30 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Debris at KP-10 ............. 73
Figure 31 SSS Crossing Cable Optic Telkomsel With Pipeline 12” Gas WHP to ORF at KP-
14.05........................................................................................................................................ 74
Figure 32 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Debris at KP-15 ............. 74
Figure 33 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Debris at KP-20 ............. 75
Figure 34. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Debris at KP-25 ............ 75

v
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Figure 35 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Debris at KP-30 ............. 76
Figure 36 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Protrude Land At KP-3576
Figure 37 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Scour At KP-40 ............ 77
Figure 38 SSS crossing pipeline PHE WMO 12” at KP-42.003 ................................................ 77
Figure 39 Positioning Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 12” At KP-42.003 ..................................... 78
Figure 40. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Debris At KP-45 .......... 78
Figure 41. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Debris At KP-50.4 ....... 79
Figure 42. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Slippers At KP-50.6 ..... 79
Figure 43. SSS Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 16” At KP-50.397 .............................................. 80
Figure 44. Positioning Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 16” At KP-50.397 .................................... 80
Figure 45. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-55 .............................. 81
Figure 46. SSS expose pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF view debris at KP-60 .............. 81
Figure 47. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Slippers At KP-65 ........ 82
Figure 48. SSS Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 14” At KP-66.634 .............................................. 82
Figure 49. Positioning Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 14” At KP-66.634 .................................... 83
Figure 50. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-70 .............................. 83
Figure 51. SSS Expose And Buried Pipe 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-75 ................. 84
Figure 52. SSS Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Debris At KP-80 ............ 84
Figure 53 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-81 ............................... 85
Figure 54. SSS Expose 3 Pipeline WHP To FPSO Near Platform ............................................ 85
Figure 55. SSS Expose 3 Pipeline WHP To FPSO .................................................................. 86
Figure 56. SSS Expose 3 Pipeline Intake At FPSO .................................................................. 86
Figure 57. SSS Plem At FPSO................................................................................................. 87
Figure 58. SSS Crossing 3 Pipeline WHP To FPSO ................................................................ 87
Figure 59. SSS Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF............................................... 88
Figure 60. SBP buried pipe 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-9.5 ...................................... 92
Figure 61. SBP buried pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-10 .................................. 92
Figure 62. SBP expose pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-10.5 10% ..................... 93
Figure 63. SBP crossing cable optic Telkomsel at KP-14.050 .................................................. 94
Figure 64. SBP Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-14.5 10% ................... 95
Figure 65. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-17................................ 95
Figure 66. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-18................................ 96
Figure 67. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-20................................ 96
Figure 68. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-25................................ 97
Figure 69. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-30................................ 97
Figure 70. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-35................................ 98
Figure 71. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF 90% At KP-40........................ 98
vi
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Figure 72. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF 90% At KP-40........................ 99
Figure 73. SBP crossing pipeline PHE WMO 12” at KP-42.003 ............................................. 100
Figure 74. SBP buried pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-45 ................................ 101
Figure 75. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-50.............................. 101
Figure 76. SBP Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 16” At KP-50.397 ............................................ 103
Figure 77. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-55.............................. 104
Figure 78. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF 90% At KP-60...................... 104
Figure 79. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-65.............................. 105
Figure 80. SBP Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 16” At KP-66.634 ............................................ 106
Figure 81. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-70.............................. 107
Figure 82. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-75.............................. 107
Figure 83. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-80.............................. 108
Figure 84. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-81.............................. 108
Figure 85. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-82.............................. 109
Figure 86. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-83.............................. 109
Figure 87. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-84.............................. 110
Figure 88. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-85.............................. 110
Figure 89. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-86.............................. 111
Figure 90. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-87.............................. 111
Figure 91. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-88.............................. 112
Figure 92. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-89.............................. 112
Figure 93. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-90.............................. 113
Figure 94. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-91.............................. 113
Figure 95. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-92.............................. 114
Figure 96. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-93.............................. 114
Figure 97. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-94.............................. 115
Figure 98. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-95.............................. 115
Figure 99. SBP buried pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-96 ................................ 116
Figure 100. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-100 .......................... 116
Figure 101. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-101 .......................... 117
Figure 102. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-102 .......................... 117
Figure 103. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-103 .......................... 118
Figure 104. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-104 .......................... 118
Figure 105. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-105 .......................... 119
Figure 106. The detected pipeline in SBP data, line
“PETRONAS_001cr_ptrn_97_20191207_102951.ses” .......................................................... 119

vii
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Figure 107. The detected pipeline in SBP data, line “PETRONAS_
001PETRONAS_20191205_231138.ses” .............................................................................. 120
Figure 108. The detected pipeline in SBP data, line
“PETRONAS_001Cr_Ptrns_43_20191206_125800.ses” ....................................................... 120
Figure 109. The detected pipeline in SBP data, line
“PETRONAS_001PETRONAS1_20191210_151734.ses” ...................................................... 121
Figure 110. The detected pipeline in SBP data, line
“PETRONAS_001Cr_Ptrns_58_20191206_161239.ses” ....................................................... 121
Figure 111. SBP Survey Line at Crossing Area PHE30 – PPP Pipeline Route ....................... 122
Figure 112. Crossing pipeline at line (a) “PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41c_20191206_212142.ses”
.............................................................................................................................................. 122
Figure 113. Crossing pipeline at line (b) “PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41e_20191206_222403.ses”
.............................................................................................................................................. 123
Figure 114. Crossing pipeline at line (c) “PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41b_20191206_211237.ses”
.............................................................................................................................................. 124
Figure 115. SBP Survey Line at Crossing Area CPP - ORF Pipeline Route ........................... 125
Figure 116. Crossing pipeline at line (b) “PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_e_20191207_130659.ses”
.............................................................................................................................................. 126
Figure 117. Crossing pipeline at line (c) “PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_b_20191207_124928.ses”
.............................................................................................................................................. 127
Figure 118 Multibeam coverage at KP 80 .............................................................................. 128
Figure 119 Multibeam coverage at KP 85 .............................................................................. 128
Figure 120 Multibeam coverage at KP 90 ............................................................................. 129
Figure 121. Multibeam coverage at KP 95 ............................................................................. 129
Figure 122. Multibeam coverage at KP 100 ........................................................................... 130
Figure 123. Multibeam coverage at KP 105 ........................................................................... 130

viii
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
TABLE
Table 1 Survey Personel ......................................................................................................... 17
Table 2 Survey Equipment....................................................................................................... 18
Table 3 Result of DGNSS Verification Using Hemisphere VS330 ............................................ 21
Table 4 Beacon Calibration Value............................................................................................ 22
Table 5 Status Identification Crossing Pipe With SBP/SSS...................................................... 40
Table 6.side scan sonar (SSS) result Kp-1 to KP-105.............................................................. 40
Table 7 Sub Bottom Profile (SBP) Status Identification Crossing Pipe ..................................... 43
Table 8 SBP Pipeline Route And Burial Depth ......................................................................... 44
Table 9 SBP Identified Pipeline Was Crossing With The Pipeline ............................................ 47
Table 10 SBP Survey Line at Crossing Area PHE30 – PPP Pipeline Route ............................ 47
Table 11 Bathymetric Survey (Multibeam Echosounder) ......................................................... 48
Table 12 Potential Reading Cathodic Protection ...................................................................... 57

ix
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Geophysical survey covers data acquisition with Side Scan Sonar, Sub Bottom Profile
and Multibeam Echosounder. The survey was conducted starting from offshore KP 0-80 with
Equipment used by the sub-bottom profile and Side Scan Sonar to determine the position of the
pipeline. The position of the exposed pipe will be clearly seen on the side scan sonar with the
GNSS position. Buried pipes will not be seen with a sonar side scan but will be seen using a
Sub-bottom Profile. Nearshore surveys are carried out on KP 80 to KP 105 using Multibeam
Echosounder (to map depth around the pipe), Sub-bottom Profile (to find out where the pipe is
buried or exposed) and side scan sonar to view the pipelines in imaging.

From 0.5 to KP 105 KP there are 5 crossings with 4 pipelines and 1 crossing with optical
cable (not shown in the survey results). The pipe crossing is found at KP 15, KP 42, KP 50, KP
66 and KP 83. Along the 12 Inch petronas pipeline there are several fishing nets and debris
(more clearly seen in the description below). There is also a fishing net in the nearshore area
located at KP 94 and KP100 fishing net is just above the pipe and extends along about 300
meters across the pipe. In KP 0 to KP 70 the pipe was exposed and in KP 80 to KP 101 the
pipe was buried. More complete analysis will be performed after data processing and
interpretation by geophysics

Subsea CP survey has been performed at 12” Export Pipeline from BTJT A WHP to
Landfall ORF 110 Km length. The survey methods implemented to this pipeline are ‘cell to cell’
method and Trailing wire method for Pipe Potential measurement (CP).

The pipeline had potentials in between -921 mV to -1024 mV that was within the
protection range of -800 mV to -1100 mV, with reference to a Silver/ Silver Chloride [Ag\AgCl]
electrode, as in Det Norske Veritas Recommended Practice B401 1993 and was found to be
adequately protected against external corrosion and no remedial actions were identified.

No anomalies were found and hence no any immediate remedial actions are required.

Perform periodic CP monitoring at time interval of about 3 years. Regular monitoring will
allow a historical cathodic protection data base that could then be used on future surveys to
assess the significance of these trends as they develop.

10 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
INTRODUCTION

PT. Jaya Salvage Indonesia (JASALINDO) and PT. Warma Trierindo is pleased to
present this site report prior to conduct the geophysical survey to support Side Scan Sonar
(SSS) and Sub Bottom Profile (SBP) positioning services for pipeline BTJT-A, ORF-WHP Kp-
81 to kp-0 in Ketapang field.
Cathodic potential reading with method cell to cell 90km & trailing wire (about 5km) for
pipeline.
This report describes the site work on board Garuda Emas, including various equipment
calibrations performed at around survey area in order to get all survey equipment ready prior
to work execution and summary analysis side scan sonar and sub bottom profile.

11 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
1. GENERAL
The general scope of works for the survey services consist of the following:
(a) Geophysical survey offshore work underwater inspection pipeline BTJT-A ORF-WAP
Kp105 to Kp 0, Ketapang Field
(b) Geophysical survey offshore work underwater inspection 3 pipeline WAP-FPSO,
Ketapang Field
(c) Geophysical survey equipment side scan sonar (SSS) and sub bottom profile (SBP) and
Multibeam Echosounder.

1.1 Project Location

The survey location is in the Java Sea, North of Madura

Figure 1 Survey Location

1.2 Abbreviation

BM Bench Mark
CD Chart Datum
CM Central Meridian
CTD Conductivity, Temperature and Depth
DGPS Differential Global Positioning System
DGNSS Differential Global Network Satellite System
GPR Ground Penetrating Radar
GNSS Global Network Satellite System
HWS High Water Spring
IHO International Hydrographic Organization
K3L Kesehatan, Keselamatan Kerja dan Lingkungan
12 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
LWS Low Water Spring
MBES Multi-beam Echosounder
MSL Mean Sea Level
MSP Muka Surutan Peta atau CD
PPE Personal Protective Equipment
QA Quality Assurance
QC Quality Control
SBES Single-beam Echosounder
SBP Sub Bottom Profile9`
SP44 Special Publication No.44
SPM Single Point Mooring
SSS SideScan Sonar
SVP Sound Velocity Profile
TM Transverse Mercator
TVU Total Vertical Uncertainty
UTM Universal Transverse Mercator
WGS-84 World Geodetic System 1984

1.3 Codes And Stardard

SP.44 IHO Special Publication No.44 - General Requirement for

Hydrographic Surveys
Manual No.1110-2-1003 USA Corp of Engineer, Engineering and Design –
Hydrographic Surveying
1.4 Units
Units of measurement used in this project are metric units.

1.5 Project Definition

COMPANY : Petronas
CONTRACTOR : PT. Jaya Salvage Indonesia

1.6 Navigation System And Geodetic Parameters

The navigation system was operated on WGS 1984 spheroid, TM projection and UTM
Coordinate System Zone 49 South, with parameters as follows:

SATELLITE DATUM : WGS 1984

Spheroid : WGS 1984

13 | P a g e

Semi major axis
Inverse flattening (1/f)
PROJECTION
Coordinate System
UTM Zone
Latitude of origin
Central Meridian
Scale Factor on C.M.
False Easting
False Northing
Unit of Measure
GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
: 6 378 137.000 metres
: 298.257 223 563
: Transverse Mercator (TM)
: Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)
: 49 South (108E - 114E)
: 0°00’00.000” N
: 111°00’0.000” E
: 0.9996
: 500 000 metres
: 10 000 000 metres
: International Metres

The above parameters were entered into the survey positioning system Hypack 2016
Software. The inputted parameters were checked prior to the commencement of the works.

1.7 DGPS Reference Station

Positioning of the survey vessel was carried out utilizing Satellite-based Differential
GNSS with pseudo-range correction signal. GNSS is a satellite system that is used to pinpoint
the geographic location of a user's receiver anywhere in the world. Two GNSS systems are
currently in operation: the United States' Global Positioning System (GPS) and the Russian
Federation's Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System (GLONASS).

Both of these employ a constellation of orbiting satellites working in conjunction with a

network of ground stations. The accuracy and integrity of GNSS can be improved by
augmenting it with correction data to minimize the system errors. Such augmentation is
usually based upon a concept referred to as differential in which case GNSS becomes
DGNSS (differential global navigation satellite system).

14 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 2 DGPS Coverage

1.8 Navigation And Data Acquisition Software

Hypack Software for Multibeam Surveys provides the functionality for survey planning,
data acquisition, data processing and editing. This turnkey solution offers the surveyor and
helmsman a strong tool to carry out the multibeam survey efficiently. Progress is shown real
time in top, profile, and 3D views using a color-coded digital terrain model (DTM). Various
filter settings can be applied to the multibeam data online, thus providing real-time data
processing. Quality control displays reassure the operators that the data is of the desired
quality.
Hypack Navigation Survey was also used to set the coordinate system, survey geometry,
survey equipment system, data sources, mutibeam calibration application and provide the 3D
plan view during the survey operation. Hypack 2018 software from Hypack Inc. was also
used to assign geodetic parameters, import background files, and create virtual track lines
(transects). The geodetic parameters assigned were UTM coordinate system. The survey
transects were spaced according to the accuracy required for the project by considering
survey objective, equipment to be utilized and seabed topography. Survey vessel track-line
control and position fixing were obtained by utilizing a computer-based data logging package
running HYPACK navigation software. The HYPACK navigation system processes the
geodetic position data into the correct grid system, which is then used to guide the survey
vessel accurately along preselected track-lines. The incoming data are logged on disk and
processed in real time allowing the vessel position to be displayed on a video monitor and

15 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
compared to each pre-plotted track-line as the survey progresses. Digitized shoreline and the
locations of existing structures, buoys, and control points can also be displayed on the
monitor in relation to the vessel position. The computer logging system, combined with the
HYPACK MAX software, thus provide an accurate visual representation of survey vessel
location in real time, combined with highly efficient data logging capability and post-survey
data processing and plotting routines. Survey vessel track-line control and position fixing were
obtained by utilizing a computer-based data logging package running HYPACK navigation
software. The HYPACK navigation system processes the geodetic position data into the
correct grid system, which is then used to guide the survey vessel accurately along
preselected track-lines. The incoming data are logged on disk and processed in real time
allowing the vessel position to be displayed on a video monitor and compared to each pre-
plotted track-line as the survey progresses. Digitized shoreline and the locations of existing
structures, buoys, and control points can also be displayed on the monitor in relation to the
vessel position. The computer logging system, combined with the HYPACK software, thus
provide an accurate visual representation of survey vessel location in real time, combined
with highly efficient data logging capability and post-survey data processing and plotting
routines. Offline systems will be capable of reading data files created by the online systems
and have the ability to process large batches of raw data in an efficient manner. The offline
software will also be capable of processing all data necessary to produce maps, sections,
plots, alignment sheets, and other specified output.

16 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
2. SURVEY OPERATIONS
2.1 Survey Personal

Table 1 Survey Personel

NO NAME POSITION

1 Rahmad Sugiarto Diver

2 Wiyanto Diver

3 Benecditus Bagus I Diver

4 Piet Diver

5 Novan Oktaryono Diver

6 Bayu Wirawasta Report Coordinator

7 Rohadin Report Coordinator

8 Rinto Suhendra CP Reading

9 Edy Susanto Survey Party Chief

10 Jimmy Murhas Surveyor

11 Chaerul Anwari Surveyor

12 Fausan syaidu Surveyor

13 REZA JATI REYNALDI Pilot ROV

14 MICHAEL LIBRANO A Pilot ROV

15 AJI MAULANA ROV Tekc

16 TABAH TRI CAHYADI CP Reading

17 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
2.2 Survey Equipment
Table 2 Survey Equipment

1 Sonardyne USBL 1 Set

Scout Survface Command unit 280882-002

Cable tranducer 30 m

Bracket Pole (Pipe 2x, Bracket T 1x, Plandes

1x)

2 Sonardyne Beacon Transponder 266940-010 3 unit

3x Transponder 254098-008

1x Charger Transponder 255144-004

1x Transit Case

3 Hemisphere VS330 B1909-036020-1011 1 Unit

Cable data Port A and Port B

1x adapter DC

2x Antenna GNSS

1x Black transit case

4 Trimble SPS Receiver

2x Antenna GNSS

1x Data cable

1x adaptor DC

5 Aten 4 port Z3J1-017-0192 2 Unit

Z3J1-017-0190

6 Handie Talkie Motorola CP 1660 1335VL1531 2 Unit

1335VL1557

7 Winch Elektrik 311284 1 unit

8 LCD Monitor Samsung ZZMAH4ZM401828W

9 Side Scan Sonar C-Max (SSS) 1 unit

10 Sub Bottom Profile Inomar SES 2000 (SBP 1 unit

11 ISE SES 2000 Software Processing 1 unit

18 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
12 Multibeam Echosounder (MBES) T-50 1 unit

Multibeam Echosounder (MBES) Teledyne

1 unit
MB2

13 Ship Motion Sensor (SMC 108-30) 1 unit

14 Sound Velocity (AML Minos X) 1 unit

Navigation System(Computer+Hypack
15 1 unit
Software)
16 Trailing Wire ( 30Km) 1 unit
17 Generator 125 Kva 2 unit
18 Scuba Replacement Package 1 set

19 ROV 1 set

20 CP cell to cell 1 set

21 Mix gas diving spread 1 set

22 Heliox 16/84% 4 rack

23 Pole and bracket 2 set

2.3 Preparation
During the preparation step, the following activities were made:
a. Carry out desk study prior to commencement of field works; this included the study on
available nautical charts, available previous survey results and other documents from
third parties;
b. Survey operation plan compilation. This activities included methodology of the survey
operations, list of personnel involved, list of equipment utilized and time schedule to
complete the services;
c. Quality Plan documentation.
d. Dry and wet test survey .

2.4 Vessel Offset Measurement

As quality control, vessel shape, GPS antenna position, USBL transducer position, pole
starboardside Multibeam Echosounder (MBES), Side Scan Sonar (SSS) and pole portside Sub
Bottom Profile (SBP) other offset were accurately measured in order to obtain integrated real
time navigation & positioning system correctly.

19 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 3 Garuda Emas

2.5 Calibration
The following calibration, verification and function test were taken during mobilization of
the vessel :

• Interfacing between survey equipment and navigation computer

• Online navigation computer test
• Function test of survey equipment
• DGNSS Verification at BM-SBY
• Beacon Calibration
• Side Scan Sonar (SSS) verification
• Sub Bottom Profile (SBP) verification

20 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
2.5.1 DGNSS Verification

Figure 4 Location Map of BM MR-05

A validation check of the coordinates obtained from the positioning system to be used
against the local coordinates system will be carried out prior to commencing the activities. This
validation check will be carried out in order to confirm that the positioning system to be used,
including coordinates system setup, agrees with the established system or a system to be used.
The validation check will be carried out against the existing benchmark BM BSBY, located at
Tanjung Perak Port, Surabaya, East Java.

During the validation check, the positioning system was installed on the benchmark, and
the coordinates were recorded during the period of approximately 20 minutes with the reading
intervals of 5 seconds; the result will be averaged. The differences in those coordinates were
considered as the results of validation.
For the verification, the GPS antenna of Hemisphere VS330 receiver was setup on t ben he
existing chmark BM SBY and the receiver is interfaced to the computer system with Trimble
HYDROpro Navigation software installed.

Table 3 Result of DGNSS Verification Using Hemisphere VS330

REFERENCE POSITION

BM BSBY (TJ Perak Surabaya) 690316.963 mE 9202561.624 mN

GPS Hemisphere VS330 s/n B1431-00201-01-008A 690317.275 mE 9202561.436 mN

Different 0.312 m 0.188 m

21 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 5 Verifiation at BM SBY

2.5.2 USBL Calibration

The USBL Calibration against the GPS Position, was carried out prior to performing ROV
and Diver positioning on 13 November 2019. During the USBL calibration, the USBL Beacon
position were recorded at 2 position parallel with vessel heading.

After the calibration, a verification check was performed in order to confirm that the USBL
System, including transducer offset set up was true.

Table 4 Beacon Calibration Value

NO TIME DATE TRANDUCER BEACON OFFSET X1

1 17:23:57 11232019 9242366.21 656682.03 9242365.49 656682.44 9242365.7 656682.37

2 17:23:58 11232019 9242366.26 656682 9242365.97 656682.27 9242365.78 656682.16

3 17:23:59 11232019 9242365.8 656682.5 9242365.88 656682.34 9242365.77 656682.49

4 17:24:00 11232019 9242366.1 656682.39 9242366.29 656682.34 9242365.77 656682.49

5 17:24:01 11232019 9242365.69 656682.27 9242366.64 656682.54 9242365.65 656682.28

6 17:24:01 11232019 9242365.87 656682.36 9242366.64 656682.54 9242365.85 656682.19

7 17:24:02 11232019 9242365.77 656682.16 9242366.76 656682.33 9242365.85 656682.19

22 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

NO TIME DATE TRANDUCER BEACON OFFSET X1

8 17:24:03 11232019 9242365.77 656682.16 9242366.02 656682.5 9242365.75 656682.4

9 17:24:04 11232019 9242365.88 656682.29 9242366.31 656682.25 9242365.75 656682.39

10 17:24:05 11232019 9242365.69 656682.06 9242366.13 656682.44 9242365.75 656682.39

11 17:24:06 11232019 9242365.98 656682.36 9242365.08 656682.25 9242365.75 656682.39

12 17:24:06 11232019 9242365.97 656682.35 9242365.08 656682.25 9242365.75 656682.39

13 17:24:07 11232019 9242366.18 656682.46 9242366.23 656682.3 9242365.61 656682.28

14 17:24:08 11232019 9242366.18 656682.46 9242365.94 656682.39 9242365.61 656682.28

15 17:24:09 11232019 9242365.99 656682.28 9242366.05 656682.4 9242365.89 656682.28

16 17:24:10 11232019 9242366.09 656682.26 9242365.75 656682.3 9242365.78 656682.5

17 17:24:11 11232019 9242365.89 656682.35 9242365.54 656682.45 9242365.78 656682.5

18 17:24:11 11232019 9242366 656682.39 9242365.54 656682.45 9242365.68 656682.22

19 17:24:12 11232019 9242365.82 656682.3 9242366 656682.26 9242365.56 656682.34

20 17:24:14 11232019 9242365.82 656682.3 9242365.71 656682.27 9242365.85 656682.4

21 17:24:15 11232019 9242365.82 656682.37 9242365.92 656682.52 9242365.52 656682.5

22 17:24:16 11232019 9242365.71 656682.46 9242366 656682.43 9242365.71 656682.37

23 17:24:16 11232019 9242365.82 656682.24 9242365.98 656682.39 9242365.71 656682.44

24 17:24:17 11232019 9242365.85 656682.35 9242365.98 656682.39 9242365.71 656682.44

25 17:24:18 11232019 9242365.67 656682.34 9242365.98 656682.39 9242365.71 656682.44

26 17:24:19 11232019 9242365.67 656682.34 9242365.94 656682.5 9242365.68 656682.24

27 17:24:20 11232019 9242365.85 656682.46 9242365.2 656682.41 9242365.86 656682.46

23 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

NO TIME DATE TRANDUCER BEACON OFFSET X1

28 17:24:21 11232019 9242365.76 656682.2 9242365.62 656682.31 9242365.86 656682.3

29 17:24:21 11232019 9242365.58 656682.29 9242365.36 656682.16 9242365.86 656682.41

30 17:24:22 11232019 9242365.81 656682.62 9242365.31 656682.13 9242365.86 656682.41

31 17:24:23 11232019 9242365.8 656682.37 9242365.99 656682.42 9242365.86 656682.51

32 17:24:24 11232019 9242365.8 656682.37 9242365.67 656682.29 9242365.83 656682.43

33 17:24:25 11232019 9242365.79 656682.25 9242365.87 656682.19 9242365.92 656682.44

34 17:24:26 11232019 9242365.78 656682.24 9242366.35 656682.22 9242365.83 656682.44

35 17:24:26 11232019 9242365.78 656682.25 9242365.75 656682.27 9242366.07 656682.44

36 17:24:27 11232019 9242365.88 656682.46 9242365.75 656682.27 9242366.16 656682.44

37 17:24:28 11232019 9242365.78 656682.29 9242365.85 656682.26 9242366.16 656682.44

38 17:24:29 11232019 9242365.78 656682.29 9242365.65 656682.31 9242365.95 656682.33

39 17:24:30 11232019 9242365.89 656682.41 9242365.85 656682.28 9242366.54 656682.31

40 17:24:31 11232019 9242365.77 656682.41 9242366.06 656682.16 9242366.94 656682.68

41 17:24:31 11232019 9242365.74 656682.41 9242365.75 656682.27 9242366.42 656682.45

42 17:24:32 11232019 9242365.62 656682.37 9242365.75 656682.27 9242366.42 656682.45

43 17:24:33 11232019 9242365.92 656682.46 9242365.75 656682.28 9242367.03 656682.55

44 17:24:34 11232019 9242365.92 656682.46 9242366.17 656682.24 9242367.35 656682.6

45 17:24:35 11232019 9242365.53 656682.37 9242365.8 656682.23 9242366.56 656682.33

46 17:24:36 11232019 9242365.81 656682.28 9242365.78 656682.26 9242366.1 656682.38

47 17:24:36 11232019 9242365.68 656682.27 9242365.77 656682.36 9242366.71 656682.35

48 17:24:37 11232019 9242365.66 656682.49 9242365.77 656682.36 9242366.71 656682.35

49 17:24:38 11232019 9242365.66 656682.49 9242365.88 656682.37 9242366.81 656682.66

50 17:24:39 11232019 9242365.45 656682.25 9242365.82 656682.16 9242367.81 656682.74

AVERAGE 9242365.831 656682.332 9242365.87 656682.33 9242366.03 656682.41

24 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Heading from Beacon A1 and A2 Vessel Heading Correction

183.30° 181.8.° 1.5°

Figure 6 Screenshot Of Verification Check (Beacon A1 and A2) After Input The Calibration

Figure 7 Angle Calculation at Autocad

25 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

2.5.3 Heading Calibration

The Heading calibration was done on 13 November 2019 for at lamongan Shore Base
Jetty, Indonesia. The alignment of the gyrocompass against the survey vessel’s axis was
checked by traditional land survey technique using a survey total station in order to
determine the heading correction while the vessel was alongside.

With the survey total station set up and referenced to the azimuth baseline established on
the quayside, range and bearing were measured to the prisms installed on the vessel at the
bow and stern along the vessel’s axis. During the measurements, the gyro’s readings were
simultaneously logged.

From the measurements, the heading of the vessel was computed. The computed heading
was then used to compare with the observed (O) heading readings to give the systematic
correction. The mean C-O correction derived was -0.863° (projection Universal Transverse
Mercator 111°E) and entered into the navigation system for correction of the vessel heading
and offset position derivation.

Vessel Heading Heading

Month /
Location (During
Date Mean C- Standard
Calibration) O Deviation

13
Lamongan VS 330
November 91° -0.863° 0.29
Shore base Hemisphere
2019

26 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 8 Drawing showing Vessel Alongside And Station Locations FJM 01 & FJM 02

2.6 Sound Velocity Correction

Sound velocity profiles were measured at survey area The unit was firstly
configured by Seacast AML software. However, it was recommended that data should be
logged in the pressure trip mode where pressure (depth) and sound velocity were recorded
at every 1.0 m or less through the water column. Remembered to tare the instrument prior to
deployment so that sea surface atmospheric pressure was determined to ‘zero’ to the
instrument. In addition, surface sound velocity probe was also installed next to the
multibeam echosounder transducer to support real-time data processing. The data
continuously inputted to the multibeam echosounder system via serial communication ports.

A set of velocity profiles of sound in sea-water values (derived from a Seacast

AML probe at the survey location) was used to convert the two-way travel times measured
by the echo-sounder to water depth in meters. The sound velocity profiles data was used in
order to remove ray bending in the water column.

27 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 9 Sound Velocity Profiler

2.7 Multibeam Patch Test Calibration

Before putting a multibeam system into use, survey personnel mount all of the
equipment on the vessel. In a perfect word, mounting all the pieces of equipment on the
same planar surface, so that everything is conveniently and perfectly oriented to one
another. Most systems have their equipment mounted in multiple locations on the boat, and
there is no guarantee that they are in this perfect symmetry.
A patch test is a combination of hydrographic survey data collection procedures and the
subsequent statistical analysis that is performed on this collected data to determine angular
misalignments and timing differences in the multibeam system hardware.
The Pitch test determines the offset or angular misalignment between the fore/aft orientation
of the multibeam sonar head with respect to the motion reference unit (MRU) or inertial
motion unit (IMU). The Roll test determines the offset or angular misalignment between the
port/starboard orientation of the multibeam sonar head with respect to the motion reference
unit (MRU) or inertial motion unit (IMU). The Yaw Test determines the offset or angular
misalignment between the orientation of the multibeam sonar head with respect to the
heading sensor.
Prior to running of the survey lines, a patch test survey was carried out. Several survey
lines with approximately 500m long each at 50m intervals were run over a slope seabed,
flat area and ensure 100% swath overlap. The patch test verified the multibeam transducer
orientation as well as heave-pitch-roll-yaw corrections to ensure they were within the
required survey accuracy.

28 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 10 Patchtest Line Calibration

Figure 11 MBES Patch Test Line

29 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 12 Roll Patch Test Calibration

Figure 13 Pitch Patch Test Calibration

30 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 14 Patch Test Offset Result

2.8 Survey Methodology

2.8.1 Multi Beam Echosounding Survey

Figure 15 Grid Fly Visualization Multibeam Survey

The multibeam echosounding (and side scan sonar) survey was to delineate the seabed
topography and seabed features along the pipeline nearshore from KP 80 to Kp 105. The survey
was run parallel to the pipeline at KP 80 to KP 105 at intervals per 20 meters. All sounding results
were expressed in metric units and referenced to the datum chart (LWS) by applying corrections
from the tides of the Karang Jamuang region.
The Teledyne MB2 multi-beam echo-sounder system was used for this survey. This is an IHO-
approved plot system that is able to measure depths of up to 200 meters with 140º coverage.
Direction titles are provided by Hemisphere Dual-frequency Vector Heading. A SMC IMU-108
Motion Sensor was supplied for correcting heave, pith, roll, yaw and sway effects to the survey
vessel. The unit was positioned on the submersed echo sounder transducer mounting, the solid

31 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

state sensors and gimbals mounted accelerometers measured vertical motion of the survey
vessel due to varying sea conditions.
The detail of the Horizontal and Vertical Offset Diagram of Offshore Hydrographyc Survey
Equipment Installation can be seen at the figure and appendix. The transducer was interfaced to
a microprocessor controlled transceiver unit, which allowed the operator to select beam width,
pulse length and repetition rates dependent on the survey parameters. All data was digitally
recorde using Hypack multi-beam software.

2.8.2 Subbottom Profiling Survey

Figure 16 Sub-bottom Profiler Survey Visualisaton

Acoustic Sub-Bottom Profiling (SBP) systems are used to determine physical

properties of the sea floor and to image and characterize geological information a few meters
below the sea floor. In recent years, sub-bottom profilers have been used to measure small
scale sedimentary structures and processes in high temporal and spatial resolution. The
systems have been widely adopted by marine researchers because of their ability to collect
data rapidly and non-intrusively.

Sub-bottom profilers are usually comprised of single channel source that sends
sound pulses into the shallow sub-sea floor sediments. The sound pulses bounce off the sea

32 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
floor and subsequent buried sediment layers according to differences in their acoustic
impedance (hardness). Acoustic impedance is related to the density of the material and the
rate at which sound travels through this material. The different times taken for this signal to be
returned and recorded by the sub-bottom profiler indicate how deep the layers are below the
sea floor. The surface of the different rock strata beneath the sea floor are mapped over the
study area.
.

Figure 17 Characteristic Data Of Sub-Bottom Profiller

Figure 18. Sub-Bottom Profiller Installed on Garuda Emas AHT

Sub bottom profile survey is carried out by running cross lane every 500 meters and 1
km cross lane above the pipe is expected to get the position of the pipe vertically or
horizontally with the position of the buried or exposed pipe.
Innomar SES2000 system was used for the survey. The system was equipped with primary
frequency operating at 100kHz and secondary frequency transducers operating at 5-15 kHz.
The system recorded accurately both seabed profile and sub-seabed stratification. Soft copy

33 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
of the seismic section. continuously presented on a Waverley display. Navigation fix marks
were automatically annotated on the records together with all relevant survey data as an aid
during interpretation.
The degree of sub-bottom penetration is dependent on the sediment type, good in fine
sediments and poor in very coarse sediment such as gravels. The continuous time sections
produced were converted to depth sections using assumed acoustic velocities for the
various sub-bottom material types. For unconsolidated fine sediments an acoustic velocity of
1600m/sec was assumed.

2.8.3 Side Scan Sonar Survey

Figure 19 Beam Pattern Of Sidescan Sonar Systems

A sidescan sonar uses high-frequency sound pulses that are bounced off the sea floor
to create an image of the sea floor morphology shape) and show differences in seabed
texture and substrate types. Typically, a sidescan sonar consists of two transducers
mounted in a towed body or 'fish'. Transducers can also be mounted on either side of a
ship, on a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) or on an autonomous underwater vehicle
(AUV). Each transducer generates a fan-shaped sound pulse perpendicular to the vessel
track. When the sound pulse hits the sea floor, some of the sound is reflected back to the
transducer and some is reflected away. The returned sound is known as backscatter.

34 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 20 SSS Installed on Garuda Emas AHT

Strong return (high backscatter) typically occur when the sound is reflected off hard
and rocky surfaces, while weak return (low backscatter) occur if reflected off softer sediments
(e.g. sand). Because of the geometry of the sound pulse sent toward the sea floor, an
obstacle rising above the seabed, such as shipwreck or steep hill can cast shadows (no
return) in the sonar image. The size of the shadow can be used to determine the size of the
feature.
The side scan sonar survey was carried out covering the same areas as the bathymetric
survey with intervals of 50m and 25m at the shallower waters, utilizing Starfish side scan sonar.
Sonar fish was installed being vessel-mounted at Portside of the survey vessel. The side scan
system was operated at a range of 50m per channel, in order to have 100% coverage of the
survey area.

The side scan sonar data was logged continuously onto a hard drive in Sonar
Acquisition System. Sidescan sonar can see objects imagery especially when the pipe is
exposed, but SSS cannot see the pipe buried. sidescan sonar has a fairly wide sweep of
about 50 meters to the right and left of the ship and can see and map the obstacle, debris,
fishing net and other objects that are around the pipe line.

35 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
3. SUMMARY SURVEY RESULT

Geophysical survey covers data acquisition with Side Scan Sonar, Sub Bottom Profile
and Multibeam Echosounder. The survey was conducted starting from offshore KP 0-80 with
Equipment used by the sub-bottom profile and Side Scan Sonar to determine the position of the
pipeline. The position of the exposed pipe will be clearly seen on the side scan sonar with the
GNSS position. Buried pipes will not be seen with a sonar side scan but will be seen using a
Sub-bottom Profile. Nearshore surveys are carried out on KP 80 to KP 105 using Multibeam
Echosounder (to map depth around the pipe), Sub-bottom Profile (to find out where the pipe is
buried or exposed) and side scan sonar to view the pipe in imaging.

From 0.5 to KP 105 KP there are 5 crossings with 4 pipelines and 1 crossing with optical
cable (not shown in the survey results). The pipe crossing is found at KP 15, KP 42, KP 50, KP
66 and KP 83. Along the 12 Inch petronas pipeline there are several fishing nets and debris
(more clearly seen in the description below). There is also a fishing net in the nearshore area
located at KP 94 and KP100 fishing net is just above the pipe and extends along about 300
meters across the pipe. In KP 0 to KP 70 the pipe was exposed and in KP 80 to KP 101 the
pipe was buried. More complete analysis will be performed after data processing and
interpretation by geophysics

Figure 21 Survey Area Coverage

36 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 22 Offshore KP.0 – KP.80 Sidescan Sonar and Sub Bottom Profile Survey Area

Figure 23 Nearshore KP 80 – KP 105

Multibeam Echosounder, Side Scan Sonar and Sub Bottom Profile Survey Area

37 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
3.1 Summary Activity

No. Date Summary of Activities

Survey Team Recover survey equipment from ROV

1 26 November 2019
Container

Survey Team Preparation and Install PC for Geophysical

2 27 November 2019
Survey at Medic Room of AHTS Garuda Emas

Survey Team Continue preparation and install survey

3 28 November 2019
equipment.

Waiting for Geophysical fabrication pole at Lamongan Shore

4 29 November 2019
base.

5 30 December Installation bracket and pole at AHTS Garuda Emas

Wet test equipment survey pole port side (MBES and SSS)
6 1 December
and continue sailing to KP 80.

Continue Geophysical Survey without MBES from KP 79 to

7 2 December
KP 70.

8 3 December Continue Geophysical Survey from KP 70 to KP 55

9 4 December Continue Geophysical Survey from KP 55 to KP 30

Continue Geophysical Survey from KP 30 to KP 0.6.

10 5 December Continue Geophysical Survey ( SSS and SBP) at cross line
from KP 0.6 to KP 12

Continue Geophysical Survey ( SSS and SBP) at cross line

11 6 December 2019
from KP 12 to KP 43

Continue Geophysical Survey ( SSS and SBP) at cross line

from KP 43 to KP 81.
12 7 December 2019 Geophysical survey at Offshore area completed, survey team
recover MBES, SSS and SBP pole, AHTS Garuda Emas
sailing to Lamongan Shore Base.

13 Team Survey Packing the equipment and demob from

8 December 2019 Lamongan Shore Base to Jamrud Surabaya and continue
installation Geophysical survey equipment on Boat 20.

Boat 20 sailling to Karang jamuang and continue wet test

9 December 2019
14 and calibration MBES and continue geophysical survey at

38 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
No. Date Summary of Activities
nearshore area (KP 80 to KP 90).

Continue geophysical survey ( MBES, SSS and SBP) from

15 10 December 2019
KP 90 to KP 100

Continue geophysical survey ( MBES, SSS and SBP) from

KP 90 to KP 105 and Survey Completed. Survey team back
16 11 December 2019 to Karang Jamuang and loading Survey Equipment from Boat
20 to ATHS Garuda Emas. And Continue sailing to
Lamongan Shore Base.

Team packing all survey equipment and pickup to Lamongan

17 12 December 2019
Warehouse.

Do Safety Induction at ORF Petronas Carigali Gresik, and

18 13 December 2019
continue to assist CP survey activity.

39 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
4. SIDE SCAN SONAR (SSS) RESULT INSPECTION
The majority of side scan sonar energy was reflected directly from the seafloor (specular
reflection) and is lost to the water column. A small portion of the incident energy is absorbed
by the seafloor and sub-surface. The remaining mall portion of sound returned to the sonar
transducer (backscatter reflection) and is used for seafloor mapping.

The sonar data was preliminary interpreted on-board the survey vessel, The backscatter
images were classified based on the amplitude, surface texture and roughness. Anomalous
features apparent on the data were assigned a designation and plotted intuitively from survey
line to survey line. The strength of backscatter (high, moderate, low) and uniformity of tone
(texture, whether smooth or rough) and the presence of acoustic shadows were used to
identify features and map the seafloor sediment type.

Description side scan sonar (SSS) identification crossing pipe 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF

Table 5 Status Identification Crossing Pipe With SBP/SSS

No Crossing Pipe KP Position Status

1 Cable optic Telkomsel 15+050 X:742.864,21, Y: 9.265.336,21 Expose Pipe, Buried

Cable

2 Pipe PHE WMO 12” 42+003 X:715,923,23, Y: 9.257.894,79 Expose Pipe

3 Pipe PHE WMO 16” 50+397 X:707.763,52, Y: 9.256.025,85 Expose Pipe

4 Pipe PHE WMO 14” 66+634 X:591.625,33, Y: 9.254.202,87 Expose Pipe

5 Pipe Hess Gas Pipe 18” 83+684 X: 688661.96 Y: 9238061.98 Buried Pipe

Table 6.side scan sonar (SSS) result Kp-1 to KP-105

No KP Position Description Condition

Petronas pipeline
Not found
1 KP-1 Lat.06° 36’.712 S, Long.113° 18’.047 E 12” Gas BTJT-A
pipe
WHP to ORF
Expose pipe
Petronas pipeline
KP-4.7 to and curved
2 Lat.06° 37’.242 S, Long.113° 16’.052 E 12” Gas BTJT-A
KP-4.3 line and loss
WHP to ORF
pipeline
Petronas pipeline Expose pipe
3 KP-5 Lat.06° 37’.447 S, Long.113° 15’.391 E 12” Gas BTJT-A and view
WHP to ORF slippers
Petronas pipeline Expose pipe
4 KP-10 Lat.06° 38’.279 S, Long.113° 12’.431 E 12” Gas BTJT-A and view
WHP to ORF debris
Crossing cable optic
Expose pipe
Telkomsel with
5 KP-14.050 Lat.06° 38’.891 S, Long.113° 10’.266 E and view
pipeline 12” Gas
slippers
WHP to ORF

40 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Petronas pipeline Expose pipe

6 KP-15 Lat.06° 38’.891 S, Long.113° 10’.266 E 12” Gas BTJT-A and view
WHP to ORF debris
Petronas Pipeline Expose pipe
7 KP-20 Lat.06° 39’.799 S, Long.113° 07’.288 E 12” Gas BTJT-A and view
WHP to ORF debris
Petronas Pipeline Expose pipe
8 KP-25 Lat.06° 40’.343 S, Long.113° 05’.094 E 12” Gas BTJT-A and view
WHP to ORF debris
Petronas Pipeline Expose pipe
9 KP-30 Lat.06° 41’.270 S, Long.113° 02’.024 E 12” Gas BTJT-A and view
WHP to ORF debris
Petronas Pipeline Expose pipe
10 KP-35 Lat.06° 41’.786 S, Long.113° 00’.169 E 12” Gas BTJT-A view protrude
WHP to ORF land
Petronas Pipeline Expose pipe
11 KP-40 Lat.06° 42’.226 S, Long.112° 58’.393 E 12” Gas BTJT-A and view
WHP to ORF scour
Crossing pipe PHE
WMO 12” with
12 KP-42.003 Lat.06° 42’.551 S, Long.112° 57’.216 E Expose pipe
Pipeline 12” Gas
WHP to ORF
Petronas Pipeline Expose pipe
13 KP-45 Lat.06° 43’.160 S, Long.112° 55’.038 E 12” Gas BTJT-A and view
WHP to ORF debris
Petronas Pipeline Expose pipe
14 KP-50 Lat.06° 43’.664 S, Long.112° 52’.126 E 12” Gas BTJT-A view slippers
WHP to ORF and debris
Crossing pipe PHE
WMO 16” with
15 KP-50.397 Lat.06° 43’.662 S, Long.112° 52’.752 E Expose pipe
Pipeline 12” Gas
WHP to ORF
Petronas Pipeline
16 KP-55 Lat.06° 45’.826 S, Long.112° 42’.405 E 12” Gas BTJT-A Expose pipe
WHP to ORF
Petronas Pipeline Expose pipe
17 KP-60 Lat.06° 44’.161 S, Long.112° 47’.561 E 12” Gas BTJT-A and view
WHP to ORF debris
Petronas Pipeline Expose pipe
18 KP-65 Lat.06° 44’.442 S, Long.112° 45’.461 E 12” Gas BTJT-A and view
WHP to ORF slippers
Crossing pipe PHE
WMO 14” with
19 KP-66.634 Lat.06° 44’.614 S, Long.112° 44’.044 E Expose pipe
Pipeline 12” Gas
WHP to ORF
Expose pipe
Petronas Pipeline
20% and
20 KP-70 Lat.06° 46’.283 S, Long.112° 42’.456 E 12” Gas BTJT-A
buried pipe
WHP to ORF
80%
Expose pipe
Petronas Pipeline
25% and
21 KP-75 Lat.06° 50’.396 S, Long.112° 42’.467 E 12” Gas BTJT-A
buried pipe
WHP to ORF
75%

41 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Petronas Pipeline
22 KP-80 Lat.06° 48’.611 S, Long.112° 42’.434 E 12” Gas BTJT-A Buried pipe
WHP to ORF
Petronas Pipeline
23 KP-81 Lat.06° 51’.413 S, Long.112° 42’.442 E 12” Gas BTJT-A Expose pipe
WHP to ORF
Petronas Pipeline
24 WHP-FPSO Lat.06° 51’.413 S, Long.112° 42’.442 E 12” Gas BTJT-A Expose pipe
WHP to ORF
Petronas Pipeline
Lat.06° 51’. 57.5213” S, Long.112° 42’
25 KP 82 12” Gas BTJT-A Buried
26.7655” E
WHP to ORF
Petronas Pipeline
Lat.06° 53’. 24.959” S, Long.112° 42’
26 KP 83+64 12” Gas BTJT-A Buried
27.077” E
WHP to ORF
Sand Dune at
Lat.06° 53’ 37.551’ S, Long.112° 42’ Petronas Pipeline
27 KP 84 Buried
26.399” E 12” Gas BTJT-A
WHP to ORF
Scar from Trawling
Lat.06° 56’ 40.551’ S, Long.112° 41’ at Petronas Pipeline
28 KP-90 Buried
36.399” E 12” Gas BTJT-A
WHP to ORF
Fishing Net at
Lat.06° 58’ 49.490” S, Long.112° 40’ Petronas Pipeline
29 KP-94 Buried
53.9553.” E 12” Gas BTJT-A
WHP to ORF
Sand Riple at
Lat.07° 01’ 23.55” S, Long.112° 39’ Petronas Pipeline
30 KP-99 Buried
44.225.” E 12” Gas BTJT-A
WHP to ORF
Fishing Net at
Lat.07° 01’ 47.42” S, Long.112° 39’ Petronas Pipeline
31 KP-100 Buried
47.223.” E 12” Gas BTJT-A
WHP to ORF
Expose Pipe
Lat.07° 02’ 22.42” S, Long.112° 39’ Petronas Pipeline
32 KP-101 Expose
32.1121 E 12” Gas BTJT-A
WHP to ORF

42 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
5. SUB BOTTOM PROFILE (SBP)
Seismic reflections observed on sub bottom profiling data are caused by an impedance
contrast (a product of density and seismic velocity of a medium) between geological
surfaces. The reflections correspond to the pipeline between different sedimentary units and
provide detail of the depositional environment, formation processes and likely hydrodynamic
conditions at the time of deposition.

Parametric data acquisition achieved sufficient penetration for the pipeline underwater
inspection. The observation of reflectors at depth indicates that the sub bottom profiling
system was functioning properly of the system to achieve penetration.

Description sub bottom profile (SBP) identification crossing pipe 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to
ORF

Table 7 Sub Bottom Profile (SBP) Status Identification Crossing Pipe

No Crossing Pipe KP Position Status

1 Cable optic Telkomsel 14+050 X:742.864,21, Y: 9.265.336,21 Buried Cable

Expose Pipe 10-

2 Pipe PHE WMO 12” 42+003 X:715,923,23, Y: 9.257.894,79
20%

Expose Pipe 10-

3 Pipe PHE WMO 16” 50+397 X:707.763,52, Y: 9.256.025,85
20%

4 Pipe PHE WMO 14” 66+634 X:591.625,33, Y: 9.254.202,87 Expose Pipe

5 Pipe Hess Gas Pipe 18” 83+684 X: 688661.96 Y: 9238061.98 Buried Pipe

5.1 Pipeline Identification

Innomar SES2000 Sub Bottom Profiling (SBP) was used to map buried pipeline route. In
the absence of any velocity information for the shallow sediments, all time depth conversion
used in the shallow seismic interpretation is based on the assumed acoustic velocity in
unconsolidated shallow sediment of 1600 m/sec. Shallow geology and sub-seabed
sediment interpretations are based on the seismic attributes, reflection characteristics,
sedimentary structures and sub-seabed features noted on the sub-bottom profiler data.
Whilst the Innomar crossing the pipeline, a hyperbolic trace will be noted and delineated as
the top of pipe (TOP).

Detail pipeline route and burial depth described in the following table. Minus sign (-) indicating
that the pipeline was in exposed condition.

43 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Table 8 SBP Pipeline Route And Burial Depth
Coordinate
Top of Seabed Burial
No File Name Easting Northing KP
Pipe (m) (m) Depth (m)
(mE) (mN)

1 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS_20191205_224300.ses 746187.75 9266264.54 9+539 57.3 57.6 -0.3

2 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS_20191205_231138.ses 745209.19 9265994.08 10+554 57.0 57.3 -0.3

3 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS_20191205_233915.ses 744249.84 9265730.47 11+549 56.8 57.1 -0.3

4 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS_20191205_235323.ses 743734.23 9265574.36 12+088 57.2 57.2 0.0

5 PETRONAS 001Cr_Cable_tlkm_20191206_072826.ses 743188.60 9265435.51 12+650 56.1 56.4 -0.3

6 PETRONAS 001Cr_Cable_tlkm_20191206_073641.ses 743012.97 9265365.07 12+838 56.0 56.3 -0.3

7 PETRONAS 001Cr_Cable_tlkm_20191206_075618.ses 742935.29 9265346.81 12+918 56.0 56.2 -0.2

8 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_28_20191206_083607.ses 741863.34 9265069.48 14+025 55.4 55.6 -0.2

9 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_29_20191206_084958.ses 741379.29 9264915.47 14+533 55.4 55.6 -0.2

10 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_32_20191206_093122.ses 739923.59 9264536.31 16+037 55.3 55.4 -0.1

11 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_33_20191206_094544.ses 739466.86 9264386.65 16+517 55.3 55.3 0.0

12 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_33_20191206_100354.ses 738952.04 9264266.95 17+045 55.0 55.1 -0.1

13 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_35_20191206_101914.ses 738498.08 9264119.20 17+522 54.9 55.1 -0.2

14 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_36_20191206_103532.ses 737977.45 9263997.00 18+056 54.9 54.9 0.0

15 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_38_20191206_110751.ses 737036.43 9263735.13 19+033 55.0 55.0 0.0

16 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_39_20191206_112422.ses 736540.75 9263578.77 19+552 54.7 54.9 -0.2

17 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_40_20191206_113815.ses 736048.69 9263464.47 20+057 54.8 54.9 -0.1

18 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_42_20191206_124437.ses 735089.27 9263189.79 21+056 54.8 54.9 -0.1

19 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_43_20191206_125800.ses 734605.06 9263029.21 21+565 56.8 55.0 1.8

20 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_44_20191206_131030.ses 734124.75 9262932.82 22+054 54.3 54.5 -0.2

21 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_45_20191206_132304.ses 733674.00 9262786.40 22+527 54.1 54.2 -0.1

22 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_46_20191206_133611.ses 733169.98 9262668.25 23+045 54.2 54.2 0.0

23 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_47_20191206_135420.ses 732688.17 9262513.95 23+550 54.0 54.0 0.0

24 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_48_20191206_141146.ses 732173.93 9262393.71 24+078 53.9 54.0 -0.1

25 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_49_20191206_142801.ses 731703.90 9262241.25 24+572 53.8 53.9 -0.1

26 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_50_20191206_144020.ses 731247.52 9262136.88 25+040 53.9 53.9 0.0

27 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_51_20191206_145319.ses 730742.43 9261975.50 25+569 53.9 53.9 0.0

28 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_52_20191206_150559.ses 730274.00 9261867.43 26+050 53.7 53.9 -0.2

29 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_53_20191206_151754.ses 729755.52 9261703.23 26+592 53.6 53.7 -0.1

30 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_54_20191206_152940.ses 729288.42 9261597.75 27+071 53.6 53.6 0.0

31 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_55_20191206_153929.ses 728827.99 9261448.60 27+120 53.5 53.7 -0.2

32 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_56_20191206_155035.ses 729312.46 9261325.93 27+554 53.6 53.8 -0.2

33 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_57_20191206_160041.ses 727856.12 9261177.75 28+563 53.5 53.6 -0.1

34 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_58_20191206_161239.ses 727371.19 9261067.40 29+061 54.0 53.5 0.5

35 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_70_20191206_184429.ses 721574.64 9259465.53 35+074 52.6 52.7 -0.1

36 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_71_20191206_185705.ses 721104.86 9259314.80 35+567 52.6 52.7 -0.1

37 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_73_20191206_192018.ses 720162.86 9259053.91 36+544 52.5 52.5 0.0

38 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_74_20191206_193323.ses 719646.65 9258935.01 37+073 52.3 52.3 0.0

44 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Coordinate
Top of Seabed Burial
No File Name Easting Northing KP
Pipe (m) (m) Depth (m)
(mE) (mN)

39 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_75_20191206_194406.ses 719204.28 9258788.13 37+539 52.0 52.0 0.0

40 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_76_20191206_195627.ses 718674.60 9258659.17 38+084 52.3 52.3 0.0

41 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_77_20191206_200822.ses 718206.57 9258513.67 38+573 52.1 52.2 -0.1

42 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_78_20191206_202040.ses 717717.61 9258399.59 39+075 52.5 52.9 -0.4

43 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_80_20191206_204418.ses 716756.79 9258134.67 40+072 51.7 51.9 -0.2

44 PETRONAS 001Cr_Ptrns_80_20191206_205522.ses 716279.51 9257980.24 40+572 52.0 52.1 -0.1

45 PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41a_20191206_210438.ses 716036.44 9257935.52 40+819 51.7 51.9 -0.2

46 PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41c_20191206_212142.ses 715978.68 9257920.20 40+879 51.9 51.9 0.0

47 PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41e_20191206_222403.ses 715908.12 9257901.22 40+951 51.4 52.1 -0.7

48 PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41b_20191206_211237.ses 715844.48 9257862.49 41+023 51.8 51.9 -0.1

49 PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41d_20191206_213429.ses 715777.59 9257842.98 41+093 52.0 52.1 -0.1

50 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_82_20191206_224232.ses 715284.25 9257707.39 41+605 51.7 51.8 -0.1

51 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_83_20191206_225429.ses 714841.86 9257605.27 42+059 51.7 51.8 -0.1

52 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_85_20191206_231809.ses 713860.44 9257336.15 43+077 51.2 51.4 -0.2

53 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_86_20191207_062355.ses 712940.23 9257058.92 44+033 50.2 50.3 -0.1

54 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_87_20191207_064038.ses 711948.67 9256804.89 45+062 49.6 49.7 -0.1

55 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_88_20191207_065706.ses 710997.57 9256522.07 46+052 49.7 49.7 0.0

56 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_88_20191207_071431.ses 710015.13 9256301.62 47+062 49.6 49.7 -0.1

57 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_89_20191207_072930.ses 709202.02 9256178.72 47+885 49.5 49.6 -0.1

58 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_90_20191207_074643.ses 708184.88 9256083.23 48+906 49.1 49.3 -0.2

59 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe50_a_20191207_075529.ses 707942.89 9256063.22 49+148 49.1 49.1 0.0

60 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe50_e_20191207_083545.ses 707749.56 9256015.11 49+346 48.1 49.1 -1.0

61 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe50_b_20191207_080800.ses 707699.12 9256028.21 49+395 48.9 49.0 -0.1

62 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe50_d_20191207_083008.ses 707606.39 9256017.51 49+488 48.8 48.9 -0.1

63 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_91_20191207_085617.ses 706696.08 9255914.44 50+404 49.1 49.1 0.0

64 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_92_20191207_091109.ses 705750.83 9255787.36 51+357 49.0 49.0 0.0

65 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_93_20191207_092643.ses 704697.69 9255687.19 52+415 49.1 49.1 0.0

66 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_94_20191207_094513.ses 703188.76 9255497.12 53+936 48.9 49.0 -0.1

67 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_95_20191207_100107.ses 702204.79 9255407.55 54+925 48.8 48.9 -0.1

68 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_96_20191207_101510.ses 701250.12 9255278.90 55+887 48.5 48.6 -0.1

69 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_97_20191207_102951.ses 700227.17 9255184.51 56+914 48.6 48.6 0.0

70 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_98_20191207_104310.ses 699243.56 9255053.15 57+907 48.4 48.4 0.0

45 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Coordinate
Top of Seabed Burial
No File Name Easting Northing KP
Pipe (m) (m) Depth (m)
(mE) (mN)

71 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_99_20191207_105912.ses 698219.31 9254957.36 58+934 48.2 48.4 -0.2

72 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_100_20191207_111511.ses 697256.40 9254827.07 59+906 48.2 48.3 -0.1

73 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_101_20191207_112827.ses 696245.51 9254734.54 60+921 48.0 48.1 -0.1

74 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_102_20191207_114325.ses 695281.77 9254604.94 61+897 48.1 48.2 -0.1

75 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_103_20191207_115859.ses 694249.50 9254507.62 62+930 48.0 48.0 0.0

76 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_104_20191207_121346.ses 693280.68 9254377.83 63+907 47.8 47.9 -0.1

77 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_105_20191207_122928.ses 692259.29 9254284.13 64+933 47.4 47.4 0.0

78 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_a_20191207_123932.ses 691795.16 9254211.25 65+414 47.3 47.4 -0.1

79 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_c_20191207_125433.ses 691735.78 9254204.09 65+462 47.3 47.4 -0.1

80 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_e_20191207_130659.ses 691658.31 9254194.55 65+540 47.3 47.6 -0.3

81 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_b_20191207_124928.ses 691550.36 9254203.69 65+641 47.3 47.5 -0.2

82 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_d_20191207_130201.ses 691472.78 9254193.99 65+725 47.4 47.5 -0.1

83 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_107_20191207_133205.ses 690272.68 9254026.32 66+937 47.5 47.6 -0.1

84 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_108_20191207_140826.ses 689373.90 9253581.34 67+960 47.1 47.2 -0.1

85 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_109_20191207_143059.ses 688687.58 9252362.83 69+398 45.9 45.9 0.0

86 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_110_20191207_145704.ses 688677.26 9250722.78 71+039 44.0 44.0 0.0

87 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_111_20191207_151550.ses 688656.37 9249745.61 72+016 42.7 42.7 0.0

88 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_112_20191207_153300.ses 688673.08 9248681.10 73+081 41.9 41.9 0.0

89 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_114_20191207_161245.ses 688674.75 9246691.55 75+071 38.7 38.7 0.0

90 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_117_20191207_171221.ses 688655.98 9243687.80 78+075 32.2 32.2 0.0

91 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_118_20191207_172846.ses 688676.05 9242707.05 79+055 27.9 27.9 0.0

92 PETRONAS 001cr_ptrn_120_20191207_182746.ses 688678.35 9240725.36 81+037 11.4 11.4 0.0

93 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_154744.ses 688665.87 9239650.92 82+110 7.8 7.2 0.6

94 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_152234.ses 688643.76 9238069.27 83+693 6.0 5.7 0.3

95 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_151734.ses 688665.00 9238051.89 83+710 6.4 5.7 0.7

96 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_151304.ses 688648.11 9237940.85 83+821 5.7 5.7 0.0

97 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS_20191209_131155_CH.ses 688664.63 9237699.39 84+063 5.8 5.5 0.3

98 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_150733.ses 688665.33 9237687.04 84+075 6.4 5.6 0.8

99 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191209_133453.ses 688665.88 9237680.58 84+082 6.3 5.7 0.6

100 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_145443.ses 688666.10 9236663.15 85+099 6.2 5.6 0.6

101 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_143440.ses 688159.06 9234909.61 86+938 6.2 5.6 0.6

102 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_141158.ses 687556.21 9233351.19 88+610 6.2 5.7 0.5

103 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_135601.ses 687159.24 9232337.39 89+698 7.1 6.2 0.9

104 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191211_120652.ses 687071.20 9232105.62 89+946 7.1 6.3 0.8

105 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191211_121616.ses 686698.48 9231149.16 90+973 7.3 6.6 0.7

106 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191211_123126.ses 686328.66 9230195.73 91+996 7.5 7.0 0.5

46 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Coordinate
Top of Seabed Burial
No File Name KP
Easting Northing Pipe (m) (m) Depth (m)
(mE) (mN)

107 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191211_124224.ses 685972.78 9229281.06 92+977 7.8 7.2 0.6

108 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191211_130635.ses 685237.70 9227382.13 95+013 9.6 9.1 0.5

109 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191211_153627.ses 683296.08 9221892.32 100+849 8.6 8.0 0.6

110 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191211_144941.ses 682564.52 9217904.72 104+903 13.7 13.1 0.6

Three (3) pipeline route have been identified in the SBP data as well. All identified pipeline was
crossing with the pipeline. Details of the three (3) pipeline route tabulated in the following table.

Table 9 SBP Identified Pipeline Was Crossing With The Pipeline

Coordinate
Top of Seabed Burial
No File Name Remarks
Pipe (m) (m) Depth (m)
Easting (mE) Northing (mN)

1 PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41c_20191206_212142.ses 715997.45 9257792.74 51.9 51.9 0.0 PHE30 - PPP 12" PL

2 PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41e_20191206_222403.ses 715904.97 9257926.68 52.0 52.0 0.0 PHE30 - PPP 12" PL

3 PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41b_20191206_211237.ses 715848.45 9258003.44 51.9 52.0 -0.1 PHE30 - PPP 12" PL

4 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_c_20191207_125433.ses 691708.90 9254268.52 47.8 47.8 0.0 CPP - ORF 14" PL

5 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_e_20191207_130659.ses 691653.51 9254220.08 47.8 47.8 0.0 CPP - ORF 14" PL

6 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_b_20191207_124928.ses 691554.59 9254139.72 47.8 47.8 0.0 CPP - ORF 14" PL

7 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_d_20191207_130201.ses 691497.50 9254078.40 47.7 47.7 0.0 CPP - ORF 14" PL

8 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_151734.ses 688666.98 9238052.01 6.1 5.5 0.6 18" HESS Gas PL

9 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS_20191209_131155_CH.ses 689039.63 9237631.57 6.0 5.6 0.4 18" HESS Gas PL

Table 10 SBP Survey Line at Crossing Area PHE30 – PPP Pipeline Route

ORF TO BUKIT TUA FIELD PIPELINE ROUTE PHE 30 – PPP 12” Pipeline Route

No FILE NAME
Burial Depth
Easting(mE) Northing(mN) Easting(mE) Northing(mN) Burial Depth (m)
(m)

PETRONAS 001cr-
1 715978.68 9257920.20 0.0 715997.45 925779274 0.0
pipe41c_20191206_212142.ses

PETRONAS 001cr-
2 715908.12 9257901.22 -0.7 715904.97 9257926.68 0.0
pipe41e_20191206_222403.ses

PETRONAS 001cr-
3 715844.48 9257862.49 -0.1 715848.45 9258003.44 -0.1
pipe41b_20191206_211237.ses

47 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
6. BATHYMETRIC SURVEY (MULTIBEAM ECHOSOUNDER)

Hydrographic surveying or bathymetric surveying is the survey of physical features

present underwater. It is the science of measuring all factors beneath water that affect all the
marine activities like dredging, marine constructions, offshore drilling etc. Hydrographic
surveying is mainly conducted under authority concerns. It is mainly carried out by means of
sensors, sounding or electronic sensor system for shallow water. The multibeam equipment
used was Teledyne Reson MB2 with acquisition and processing software using PDS.
Patchtest calibration was carried out at the beginning of the survey. Retrieval of sound
velocity data is carried out in the area surveyed. Multibeam only display exposed pipe.

Table 11 Bathymetric Survey (Multibeam Echosounder)

No KP Position Remark Depth
Lat.06° 50’.354 S, Long.112° Coverage and approach 16-18 meter
1 KP 80
42’.399 E Buried
Lat.06° 53’ 6.166” S, Coverage and approach
2 KP 85 6-7 meter
Long.112° 42’ 45.30” E Buried
Lat.06° 56’ 9.79” S, Coverage and approach
3 KP 90 7-8 meter
Long.112° 41’ 57.25” E Buried
Lat.06° 59.201284’ S, Coverage and approach
4 KP 95 9- 10 meter
Long.112° 40.601148 E Scar from Trawling
KP Lat.07° 01.630715’S , Cannot approach line
5 4-15 meter
100 Long.112° 39.661058” E because of fishnet
KP Lat.07° 04.3533828’ S,
6 Coverage and approach 12 meter
105 Long.112° 39.157737’ E

48 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
7. OVERVIEW CATHODIC PROTECTION (CP)

The purpose of the CP survey was to assess the general and local cathodic protection
potential levels of the pipeline. Continuous CP profile of the pipeline can be taken by cell to cell
method. Direct contact potential readings were also taken on anode areas to ensure that the
level of cathodic protection was adequate.

The CP measurements were logged using software package on the personal computer (PC)
with cycle time equal to GPS logging mounted on ROV. The raw CP data was then post
processed to provide continuous CP chart against pipe position.

The survey was performed in accordance to the following document:

a. DNV RP B401 “Recommended Practice of Cathodic Protection Design”
b. DNV RP B403 “Recommended Practice Monitoring of Cathodic Protection Systems”

49 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
8. THEORETICAL BASIS FOR DATA ANALYSIS
8.1 Corrosion- Basic Theories
Corrosion is process that occurs naturally to metal and alloys. The rate at which it
occurs depends on the surrounding environment. When a metal is immersed in sea water, an
electrical potential is set up at the metal/electrolyte interface. The potential will be characteristic
of the particular metal and electrolyte involved.

The result of joining two dissimilar metals or different parts of the same metal surface with
different metal/electrolyte potentials leads to the formation of corrosion at one of the two sites
involved. In the cell, metallic atoms give up one or more electrons to become positively charged
ions and oxygen with water and the released electrons combining to from negatively charged
ions as illustrated below:

The current flowing within the electrolyte is from the metal with a more negative potential (the
anode) to a metal with a more positive potential (the cathode). A metal submerged in a uniform
electrolyte will suffer from corrosion damage due to the formation of anodic and cathodic areas
over its surface. As corrosion proceeds these areas move and corrosion is deemed as uniform.
Frequently however, non-uniformity of electrolyte, inhomogeneity of the metal, the variety of
oxygen access or the presence of corrosion products prevent the movement of these areas and
localized corrosion occurs, often referred to as pitting corrosion.

50 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
8.2 Cathodic Protection (CP)
The prevention of corrosion in steel when in seawater can be accomplished by a
number of methods e.g. by coatings, by use of corrosion resistant alloy and cathodic protection
(CP). In practice CP has proved the most economic and convenient method and has generally
been adopted for al offshore pipelines and platforms. The cathodic protection system combine
with coating is traditional with pipeline design and more recently with platforms.

Cathodic protection can be obtained by either of two methods, sacrificial anodes and impressed
current. Sacrificial anodes are traditionally used with pipelines whereas platforms have involved
both CP protection systems. However, recently the trend has been to utilize sacrificial anodes
on all pipelines whereas platforms have involved both CP protection systems. However,
recently the trend has been to utilize sacrificial anodes on all sub subsea structures.

8.3 Sacrificial Anodes

When two dissimilar metals are connected together in the presence of an electrolyte a current
will flow between them through the electrolyte due to the difference in their electro potentials (as
discussed earlier). The metal with the most positive electro potential will be become the
cathode and be protected from corrosion with the more negative electro potential metal
becoming the anode. The current flow is from the anode to the cathode, with the anode
therefore being consumed it is deemed being sacrificial. The objective of cathodic protection is
to make the pipeline the cathode by connecting anodes (typically zinc or aluminium) at interval
along its length thus protecting the pipeline from corrosion.

51 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
On a pipeline system which incorporates a sacrificial cathodic protection system and a
coating, the latter will primarily protect the pipeline, however any defects in the coating or that
develop over a period of time are protected by the cathodic protection system. Current will flow
from the anodes to the bare steel caused by the defect making the bare steel the cathode and
therefore protecting the defect.

8.4 Impressed Current

This method is not widely used due to the high maintenance and installation costs. The
technique in principal is the same as above but involves connecting the pipeline or structure to
the negative terminal of a transformer rectifier making it the cathode and connecting the positive
terminal to a series of anodes made of an inert material.

8.5 Theoretical basis for CP Inspection

The corrosion inspection of a cahodically protected pipeline for this survey are conducted by
measuring Electrochemical Potentials (CP)

The electrochemical potential of a steel member is a parameter defining the protective level
produced by the cathodic protection system installed on the structure. It is commonly accepted
that a properly protected pipeline must have a potential level between -800 mV and -1050 mV
(ref. Marinated Ag/AgCl) if zinc sacrificial anodes are installed and between -800 mV and -1100
mV for aluminium anodes.

If the potential reading is more positive than -800mV, the point of measurement is considered to
be under protected creating a possible environment for corrosion action on the steel surface.
Potentials measured between -800mV and -900 mV although protected, are considered as only

52 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
marginally protected. The marginal protection band between -800 mV and -900 mV is caused
by possible seasonal variations in potential measurements which may raise the potentials
above -800 mV. In addition in all cathodic protection survey techniques, an error margin caused
by, for example, distance of the probe from the metal surface etc. exists. This needs to be
considered when analyzing survey data, therefore any potential in the aforementioned range is
considered as marginal protection.

On areas of potentials more negative than -1050 mV/-1100 mV, the production of hydrogen
ions instead of hydroxyl ions may lead to the possibility of hydrogen embrittlement of the steel
surface occurring and possible enhancement of fatigue cracking. Hydrogen embrittlement is a
phenomenon where atomic hydrogen is absorbed into the metal structure and interacts with the
metal; this in turn weakens the structure, making it more susceptible to cracking.

For pipelines under anaerobic conditions i.e. buried, it is generally accepted that a potential
more negative than -900 mV is required to achieve satisfactory protection.

The un-polarized potential of zinc and aluminum in seawater is in the order of -1050 mV and -
1100 mV respectively, depending on material quality, surface condition and temperature.

Typical results can be summarized as follow:

a. A well protected pipeline is expected to have:

- General potential levels between -900 mV and -1050 mV against Ag/AgCl for zinc
anodes, and between -900 mV and -1100 mV for Aluminum alloy anodes
b. A poorly or marginally protected pipeline is expected to have:

- Large drops in the potential profiles at the anode due to high current output
- High field strength readings at local areas of high steel concentration
- General potential levels more positive than -800 mV
To maintain accurate potential readings throughout a survey the anodes are stabbed at regular
intervals. Anode stab potentials can vary from the continuously recorded potential profile. This
is dependent on the anode activity (i.e. IR drop), and is related to the distance between the
measuring electrode and the anode surface. Rapid changes in potential and measured field
gradient can occur as the probe passes over an active anode

53 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
9. SUBSEA CP INSPECTION PROCEDURE (SOP)
The following describes the equipment and operation used for subsea CP survey:

9.1 CP Stab Probe and Remote Cell Method (Cell to Cell)

CP Stab Probe and Remote Cell Equipment set up:

- CP Stab probe mounted on the ROV.

- Remote cell is positioned remotely from local pipeline potential influences (more than 10
meters from the pipeline) located on the ROV’s umbilical wire or towing by Vessel.
- CP Stab probe and remote cell probe connected to the logger and direct to computer via KB-
USB7 transfer cable using PC-Link software.
- The CP logging PC displays the data as continually moving graph and numerical outputs.
Stab probe was attached to the ROV held in a fixed position as close as possible to the
pipeline/structure. Remote cell is positioned remotely from local pipeline potential influences
(more than 10 meters from the pipeline) located on the ROV’s umbilical wire or towing by
Vessel

The CP measurements were logged on the CP survey computer with cycle time equal to GPS
logging time so that the CP data could be synchronized with the pipe position noted by the GPS
mounted on ROV.

After navigational and data resolution checks have been made, the ROV can be instructed to
commence the survey and logging initiated and then the continuous CP readings were logged
at all times along the pipeline to be inspected.

Contact potential measurement can perform by stab/contact probe to anode on the pipeline or
by direct wire connection to the pipeline structure above water (riser) to provide absolute
potential reading with refer to Ag/AgCl.

54 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

9.2 CP Stab Probe(contact probe)

The probe consists of a hard contact tip with a silver/silver chloride half-cell housed in a
unit connected via the ROV umbilical to a topside voltmeter. The Stab probe set up is used to
take contact measurement on the structure to be inspected. When the probe tip makes contact
with the surface of the steel structure (anode) a potential of the structure is obtained.

Stab probe overview

55 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
9.3 Trailing wire CP Survey Method
This method is performed by direct wire connection to pipeline structure (above water
on the platform or onshore) using wire spool which is paid out behind the survey vessel. A
silver/ silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) half-cell is towed behind the vessel moved along the pipeline.

By connecting the wire spool and the half-cell to the CP measurement system, direct pipe
potential reading can be performed. Continuous pipe potential measurement can be logged to
the CP survey system along with pipe position data provided by GPS.

9.4 Equipment
• Logger Sanwa PC720M (Impedance >10 M.Ohm)
• Pc-Link Software + USB7 PC Communication set
• Personal Computer (PC)
• Twin Cell + Stab probe (Attached on ROV)
• AgAgCl Ref. Electrode from GMC Staperm (for Remote Cell)
• Wire c/w reel for trailing wire
• Tools

56 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
10. CP SURVEY DATA

Table 12 Potential Reading Cathodic Protection

Inspection Potential
KP Reading Correction ∆V
Date (-mV/AgAgCl)
2-Dec-19 70+000 -4.31 1.23 -5.54 965.5
3-Dec-19 55+000 3.55 -1.2 4.75 955.2
4-Dec-19 30+000 8.48 6.25 2.23 957.8
5-Dec-19 0+600 1.44 3.42 -1.98 962.0
7-Dec-19 81+000 47.54 43.64 3.90 956.1
9-Dec-19 83+000 25.46 18.64 6.82 953.2
10-Dec-19 90+000 4.15 17.01 -12.86 972.9
11-Dec-19 100+000 12.82 8.38 4.44 955.6
11-Dec-19 105+000 16.99 14.41 2.58 957.4

Note:
Base potential reading refer to measured potential Riser on BTJT A WHP 50 m depth, -960
mV/AgAgCl

Calibration Log
Date Reference Cell Calibration
2 Dec 2019

Pre-survey: 1.23 mV Post-survey: 0.16 mV

3 Dec 2019

Pre-survey: 1.2 mV Post-survey: 0.12 mV

57 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
4 Dec 2019

Pre-survey: 6.24 mV Post-survey: 6.25 mV

5 Dec 2019

Pre-survey: 3.42 mV Post-survey: 3.49 mV

7 Dec 2019

Pre-survey: 38.67 mV Post-survey: 43.64 mV

9 Dec 2019

Pre-survey: 18.64 mV Post-survey: 18.87 mV

10 Dec 2019

58 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Pre-survey: 17.01 mV Post-survey: 17.14 mV
11 Dec 2019

Pre-survey: 8.38 mV Post-survey: 8.32 mV

11 Dec 2019

Pre-survey: 14.51 mV Post-survey: 14.41 mV

Reference Cell Calibration ROF

Ref. Cell
(AgAgCl) vs
Zinc

Pre-survey: 1027 mV Post-survey: 1025 mV

59 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
11. ROV INSPECTION UNDERWATER
With world beating subCAN control & diagnostics system and proven thruster reliability, MOJAVE
sets the standard by which the competition will be judged. Versatile, The MOJAVE can be supplied with a
complete range of specialist tooling / sensor skids for use Offshore or Inshore Oil & Gas, Scientific, Port
Security, Military, Civil Engineering and numerous other applications
11.1 Spesification
Vehicle dimension & weight Length 1750 mm Width 1060 mm Height 1220 mm Launch weight
500 kg Max speed 3,5 knots Payload 105 kg Forward thrust 220 kgf Vertical thrust 75kgf Max depth
rating 1500M

• Data logging
• Desktop Computers & HDD
• Apple Laptop video processor
• Power requirements
• ROV Surface control
• Power distribution units (SCU)
• 110 - 230VAC @ 5kW

Surface control unit Transportable Rack including: Control unit Video screen Analog to digital converter
HD/DVD Video recorder

Standard equipment 1x Tilt Unit with Basic Camera LED Lighting Depth Sensor Compass / Pitch / Roll
Survey JBox

Auto-Heading accuracy +/- 5° Depth control +/- 0.5 m Attitude control +/- 5°

Figure 24 ROV MOJAVE

60 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
The main purpose of this inspection is to know the actual condition of the offshore pipeline,
knowing the length of the free span that occurs on the underwater pipelines. This survey includes:
• Visual inspection of pipeline.
• To Collect data of the last coordinates underwater pipelines.
But ROV function test missing port Act thruster function and must determinate. 25 November 2019, dive
recording visual Start Survey KP 12.3 to KP 18.86.
Start Date : 24 November 2019
Finish Date : 25 November 2019
Job task : Close up visual Inspection Pipeline for KP.12.300 at Ketapang Field
Start Survey KP 12.3 to KP 18.86

Dive Date Task Results

#002 24 Nov 2019 - Start - AHTS Garuda Emas on going to approx 200m at KP
Inspection 12 .300
Pipeline for - AHTS Garuda Emas check DB vessel
KP.12.300 at - Pole USBL laydown on the water
Ketapang Field - ROV deploy on the water, Pos : E.743199,48,
N.9265431.59
- Start ROV pipeline underwater inspection, Pos :
E.743177.48, N.9265459.54

#003 24 Nov 2019 - Continue - ROV above at crossing cable optik Telkomsel view
inspection at and visiblity not good fix at KP.14.20, Pos :
KP.14.054 E.741887.00, N.9265064.12
- Note : Condition at KP 14.054 view and visibility not
good, at KP 14.20 Identification freespan on pipe
- AHTS Garuda Emas, below speed 0,1 knot, DB
enginee check, ROV stay on pipe, Pos: E.741258.34,
N.9264889.07
- AHTS Garuda Emas and ROV arrived at KP 15.20
- ROV fix debris, pos : E.740865.61, N.9264779.67
- ROV show on the pipe, Pos: E.740771.47,
N.9264779.67 till E.740708.27, N.9264737.55
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.740479.80,
N.9264700.22
- ROV view buried pipeline 80%, Pos E.740402.20,
N.9264960.41
- ROV continue underwater inspection till KP 17.1,
view pipe buried
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.740126.85,

61 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
N.9264615.38
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.740047.38,
N.9264589.99
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.740002.19,
N.9264546.93
- ROV fix freespan pipeline, pos : E.739980.05,
N.9264577.73
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.739918.43,
N.9264523.80
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.739856.79,
N.9264541.66
- ROV view buried pipeline start at KP 17.1, Pos
E.738809.92, N.9264202.87

#005 24 Nov 2019 - Continue - ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.738202.32,
inspection at N.9264169.53
KP.17.100 - ROV fix buried pipeline, pos : E.738677.49,
N.9264160.53
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.738641.23,
N.9264151.81
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.738522.11,
N.9264120.64
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.738407.76,
N.9264088.43
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.738351.70,
N.9264073.11
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.738304.74,
N.9264659.51
- ROV fix freespan pipeline, pos : E.738258.19,
N.9264046.69
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.738119.25,
N.9264007.81
- ROV fix scawer pipeline, pos : E.738061.09,
N.9263991.87
- ROV fix freespan pipeline, pos : E.738056.10,
N.9263989.34
- Power troble ROV, commence for recovery
- ROV on deck
- Recovery USBL pole

62 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

#006 25 Nov 2019 - Continue - Buried Pipeline

inspection at - ROV view pipe buried, Pos: E.738809.92,
KP 17.879 N.9264202.87
- ROV view joint pipe baried
- Concrete coating pipeline abration KP 18.200, Pos:
E.737586.63, N.9263859.52
- Vessel check anoda in pipe

63 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

AHTS Garuda Emas on going to approx 200m at KP 12 .300

- AHTS Garuda Emas on going to approx 200m at KP 12 .300

64 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
12. PHOTOGRAPH ACTIVITY

Concrete Coating Pipeline Abration KP 18.200 Suspect Anode at KP 18.230

KP 17.100 KP 17.100

Marine Growth Dominant Hard KP 17.100 Marine Growth Dominant Hard KP 17.100

65 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

KP 17.879 Pipe Buried, Pos: E.738809.92,

Buried Pipeline at KP 17.1
N.9264202.87

KP 14.054 View And Visibility KP 14.054 View And Visibility

KP 17.879 Buried Pipeline 80% KP 14.20 Identification Freespan On Pipe

66 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Cell to Cell CP Reading Visual Video ROV

Attach CP Probe on Bracket Install Remote Cell

Cell Calibration CP Probe Attached on ROV

67 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Drop Cell to Cell Activity Drop Cell to Cell Activity

Drop Cell to Cell Activity Drop Cell to Cell Activity

Logging CP Reading Logging CP Reading

68 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
13. CONCLUSION

Three (3) pipeline route have been identified in the SBP, i.e. PHE30 - PPP 12" PL, CPP -
ORF 14" PL, & 18" HESS Gas PL

Conclusion:

1. The pipeline route was derived from SBP data, SSS data and MBES data if pipeline
expose.
2. Based on SBP data, from KP 9+539 to KP 67+960 mostly in exposed condition with
1.0m maximum expose. The maximum data found at KP 49+346 (707749.56mE,
9256015.11mN)
3. A buried pipeline was found at KP 21+565 (734605.06mE, 9263029.21mN), this
occurred possible by scouring effect
4. Based on SBP data, from KP 69+398 to KP 104+903 the pipeline was in buried
condition with maximum burial depth is 0.9m
5. Three (3) pipeline route have been identified in the SBP, i.e. PHE30 - PPP 12" PL, CPP
- ORF 14" PL, & 18" HESS Gas PL
6. Based on the results from the survey, the following conclusions can be drawn:
7. The pipeline had potentials within the protection range of -800 mV to -1100 mV refer to
the Ag/AgCl electrode, as specified in DNV RP B401 1993 “Cathodic Protection
Design”.
8. The pipeline had maximum potential 1024 -mV and minimum 921 -mV with refer to
Ag/AgCl reference cell electrode

Another three (3) pipeline route have been identified in the SBP data as well. All identified
pipeline was crossing with the pipeline.

69 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
14. RECOMMENDATIONS

The 12” Export Pipeline was found to be protected against external corrosion, with
potentials within the protection range of -800 mV to -1100 mV refer to Ag/AgCl electrode, as
specified in DNV RP B401 1993 “Cathodic Protection Design”.

As potentials were within the required range, no remedial actions are required.

Perform periodic CP monitoring at time interval of about 3 years. Regular monitoring will
allow a historical cathodic protection database that could then be used on future surveys to
assess the significance of these trends as they develop.

70 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
15. APPENDIX 01 SIDE SCAN SONAR INSPECTION

KP-1
Position : Lat.06° 36’.712 S, Long.113° 18’.047 E
Description : Petronas pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Not found pipe

Figure 25. SSS Not Found Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-1
KP-4.7 to KP-4.3
Position : Lat.06° 37’.242 S, Long.113° 16’.052 E
Description : Petronas pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and curved line and loss pipeline

Figure 26. SSS Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF Curved Line Portside at KP-4.3

71 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 27 SSS Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF Curved Line Portside at KP-4.5

Figure 28 SSS Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF Curved Line Portside at KP-4.7

72 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-5
Position : Lat.06° 37’.447 S, Long.113° 15’.391 E
Description : Petronas pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view slippers

Figure 29 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Slippers at KP-5

KP-10
Position : Lat.06° 38’.279 S, Long.113° 12’.431 E
Description : Petronas pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view debris

Figure 30 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Debris at KP-10

73 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-14.050
Position : Lat.06° 38’.891 S, Long.113° 10’.266 E
Description : Crossing cable optic Telkomsel with pipeline 12” Gas WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view slippers

Figure 31 SSS Crossing Cable Optic Telkomsel With Pipeline 12” Gas WHP to ORF at KP-14.05

KP-15
Position : Lat.06° 38’.891 S, Long.113° 10’.266 E
Description : Petronas pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view debris

Figure 32 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Debris at KP-15

74 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-20
Position : Lat.06° 39’.799 S, Long.113° 07’.288 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view debris

Figure 33 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Debris at KP-20

KP-25
Position : Lat.06° 40’.343 S, Long.113° 05’.094 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view debris

Figure 34. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Debris at KP-25

75 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-30
Position : Lat.06° 41’.270 S, Long.113° 02’.024 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view debris

Figure 35 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF View Debris at KP-30
KP-35
Position : Lat.06° 41’.786 S, Long.113° 00’.169 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe view protrude land

Figure 36 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Protrude Land At KP-35

76 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-40
Position : Lat.06° 42’.226 S, Long.112° 58’.393 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view scour

Figure 37 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Scour At KP-40

KP-42.003
Position : Lat.06° 42’.551 S, Long.112° 57’.216 E
Description : Crossing pipe PHE WMO 12” with Pipeline 12” Gas WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe

Figure 38 SSS crossing pipeline PHE WMO 12” at KP-42.003

77 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 39 Positioning Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 12” At KP-42.003

KP-45
Position : Lat.06° 43’.160 S, Long.112° 55’.038 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view debris

Figure 40. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Debris At KP-45

78 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-50
Position : Lat.06° 43’.664 S, Long.112° 52’.126 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe view slippers and debris

Figure 41. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Debris At KP-50.4

Figure 42. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Slippers At KP-50.6

79 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-50.397
Position : Lat.06° 43’.662 S, Long.112° 52’.752 E
Description : Crossing pipe PHE WMO 16” with Pipeline 12” Gas WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe

Figure 43. SSS Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 16” At KP-50.397

Figure 44. Positioning Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 16” At KP-50.397

80 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-55
Position : Lat.06° 45’.826 S, Long.112° 42’.405 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe

Figure 45. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-55

KP-60
Position : Lat.06° 44’.161 S, Long.112° 47’.561 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view debris

Figure 46. SSS expose pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF view debris at KP-60
81 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-65
Position : Lat.06° 44’.442 S, Long.112° 45’.461 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe and view slippers

Figure 47. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Slippers At KP-65

KP-66.634
Position : Lat.06° 44’.614 S, Long.112° 44’.044 E
Description : Crossing pipe PHE WMO 14” with Pipeline 12” Gas WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe

Figure 48. SSS Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 14” At KP-66.634

82 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 49. Positioning Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 14” At KP-66.634

KP-70
Position : Lat.06° 46’.283 S, Long.112° 42’.456 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe 20% and buried pipe 80%

Figure 50. SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-70

83 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-75
Position : Lat.06° 50’.396 S, Long.112° 42’.467 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe 25% and buried pipe 75%

Figure 51. SSS Expose And Buried Pipe 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-75
KP-80
Position : Lat.06° 48’.611 S, Long.112° 42’.434 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 52. SSS Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF View Debris At KP-80

84 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-81
Position : Lat.06° 51’.413 S, Long.112° 42’.442 E
Description: Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe

Figure 53 SSS Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-81
WHP-FPSO
Position : Lat.06° 51’.413 S, Long.112° 42’.442 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe

Figure 54. SSS Expose 3 Pipeline WHP To FPSO Near Platform

85 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 55. SSS Expose 3 Pipeline WHP To FPSO

Figure 56. SSS Expose 3 Pipeline Intake At FPSO

86 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 57. SSS Plem At FPSO

Figure 58. SSS Crossing 3 Pipeline WHP To FPSO

87 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP 82
Position : Lat.06° 51’. 57.5213” S, Long.112° 42’ 26.7655” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried

Figure 59. SSS Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF
KP 83+64
Position : Lat.06° 53’. 24.959” S, Long.112° 42’ 27.077” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried

88 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP 84
Position : Lat.06° 53’ 37.551’ S, Long.112° 42’ 26.399” E
Description : Sand Dune at Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried

KP 90
Position : Lat.06° 56’ 40.551’ S, Long.112° 41’ 36.399” E
Description : Scar from Trawling at Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition Pipe : Buried

89 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP 94
Position : Lat.06° 58’ 49.490” S, Long.112° 40’ 53.9553.” E
Description : Fishing Net at Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition Pipe : Buried

KP 99
Position : Lat.07° 01’ 23.55” S, Long.112° 39’ 44.225.” E
Description : Sand Riple at Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition Pipe : Buried

90 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP 100
Position : Lat.07° 01’ 47.42” S, Long.112° 39’ 47.223.” E
Description : Fishing Net at Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition Pipe : Buried

KP 101
Position : Lat.07° 02’ 22.42” S, Long.112° 39’ 32.1121 E
Description : Expose Pipe Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition Pipe : Expose

91 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
16. APPENDIX 02 SUB BOTTOM PROFILE INSPECTION
KP-9.5
Position : Lat.06° 37’.972 S, Long.113° 13’.600 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 60. SBP buried pipe 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-9.5
KP-10
Position : Lat.06° 38’.090 S, Long.113° 13’.347 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 61. SBP buried pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-10

92 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-10.5
Position : Lat.06° 38’.119 S, Long.113° 13’.068 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe 10%

Figure 62. SBP expose pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-10.5 10%
KP-14.050
Position : Lat.06° 38’.448 S, Long.113° 11’.898 E
Description : Crossing cable optic Telkomsel with pipeline 12” Gas WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe and cable

93 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 63. SBP crossing cable optic Telkomsel at KP-14.050

94 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

KP-14.5
Position : Lat.06° 38’.735 S, Long.113° 11’.002 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe 10%

Figure 64. SBP Expose Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-14.5 10%
KP-17
Position : Lat.06° 39’.069 S, Long.113° 09’.676 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 65. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-17

95 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-18
Position : Lat.06° 39’.225 S, Long.113° 09’.150 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 66. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-18

KP-20
Position : Lat.06° 39’.510 S, Long.113° 08’.105 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 67. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-20
96 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-25
Position : Lat.06° 40’.238 S, Long.113° 05’.502 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 68. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-25

KP-30
Position : Lat.06° 40’.970 S, Long.113° 02’.885 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 69. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-30

97 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-35
Position : Lat.06° 41’.702 S, Long.113° 00’.263 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 70. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-35
KP-40
Position : Lat.06° 42’.445 S, Long.112° 57’.651 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose 10% and Buried pipe 90%

Figure 71. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF 90% At KP-40

98 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 72. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF 90% At KP-40
KP-42.003
Position : Lat.06° 42’.731 S, Long.112° 56’.613 E
Description : Crossing pipe PHE WMO 12” with Pipeline 12” Gas WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe 10-20%

99 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 73. SBP crossing pipeline PHE WMO 12” at KP-42.003

100 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-45
Position : Lat.06° 41’.178 S, Long.112° 55’.043 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 74. SBP buried pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-45
KP-50
Position : Lat.06° 43’.630 S, Long.112° 52’.876 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 75. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-50
101 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-50.397
Position : Lat.06° 43’.648 S, Long.112° 52’.744 E
Description : Crossing pipe PHE WMO 16” with Pipeline 12” Gas WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe 10-20%

102 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 76. SBP Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 16” At KP-50.397

103 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-55
Position : Lat.06° 43’.958 S, Long.112° 49’.763 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 77. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-55
KP-60
Position : Lat.06° 44’.306 S, Long.112° 47’.083 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe 90%

Figure 78. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF 90% At KP-60
104 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-65
Position : Lat.06° 44’.575 S, Long.112° 44’.368 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 79. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-65

KP-66.634
Position : Lat.06° 44’.635 S, Long.112° 43’.983 E
Description : Crossing pipe PHE WMO 14” with Pipeline 12” Gas WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe 90%

105 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 80. SBP Crossing Pipeline PHE WMO 16” At KP-66.634

106 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-70
Position : Lat.06° 46’.538 S, Long.112° 42’.448 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 81. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-70
KP-75
Position : Lat.06° 48’.726 S, Long.112° 42’.455 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 82. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-75

107 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-80
Position : Lat.06° 50’.354 S, Long.112° 42’.399 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 83. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-80
KP-81
Position : Lat.06° 50’.887 S, Long.112° 42’.456 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 84. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-81

108 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-82
Position : Lat.06° 51’.166 S, Long.112° 42’.442 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 85. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-82
KP-83
Position : Lat.06° 52’ 9.166 S, Long.112° 43’.26 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 86. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-83

109 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-84
Position : Lat.06° 53’ 07.166 S, Long.112° 42’ 45.4 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 87. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-84
KP-85
Position : Lat.06° 53’ 6.166” S, Long.112° 42’ 45.30” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 88. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-85
110 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-86
Position : Lat.06° 54’ 36.22 S, Long.112° 42’.44.15 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 89. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-86

KP-87
Position : Lat.06° 55’ 13.35” S, Long.112° 42’ 7.45” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 90. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-87

111 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-88
Position : Lat.06° 55’ 36.754” S, Long.112° 41’ 59.223” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 91. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-88

KP-89
Position : Lat.06° 55’ 36.754” S, Long.112° 41’ 59.223” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 92. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-89

112 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-90
Position : Lat.06° 56’ 9.79” S, Long.112° 41’ 57.25” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 93. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-90

KP-91
Position : Lat.06° 57’ 12.36” S, Long.112° 41’ 22.25” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 94. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-91

113 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-92
Position : Lat.06° 57’ 16.36” S, Long.112° 41’ 44.25” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 95. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-92
KP-93
Position : Lat.06° 58’ 6.36” S, Long.112° 41’ 32.25” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 96. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-93

114 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-94
Position : Lat.06° 58.690’ S, Long.112° 40.82255’ E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 97. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-94
KP-95
Position : Lat.06° 59.201284’ S, Long.112° 40.601148 E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 98. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-95
115 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-96
Position : Lat.06° 59’ 35.23” S, Long.112° 40’ 27.48”” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 99. SBP buried pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF at KP-96

KP-100
Position : Lat.07° 01.630715’S , Long.112° 39.661058” E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 100. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-100

116 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-101
Position : Lat.07° 02.1873927’ S, Long.112° 39.545659’ E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe

Figure 101. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-101

KP-102
Position : Lat.07° 02.7504212’ S, Long.112° 39.471519’ E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe

Figure 102. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-102

117 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-103
Position : Lat.07° 03.28946’ S, Long.112° 39.345138’ E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe

Figure 103. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-103

KP-104
Position : Lat.07° 03.8087099’ S, Long.112° 39.306436’ E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Expose pipe

Figure 104. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-104
118 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP-105
Position : Lat.07° 04.3533828’ S, Long.112° 39.157737’ E
Description : Petronas Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP to ORF
Condition : Buried pipe

Figure 105. SBP Buried Pipeline 12” Gas BTJT-A WHP To ORF At KP-105

S N

Hyperbolic trace

Figure 106. The detected pipeline in SBP data, line

“PETRONAS_001cr_ptrn_97_20191207_102951.ses”

119 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

S N

Hyperbolic trace

Figure 107. The detected pipeline in SBP data, line “PETRONAS_ 001PETRONAS_20191205_231138.ses”

N S

Hyperbolic trace

Figure 108. The detected pipeline in SBP data, line “PETRONAS_001Cr_Ptrns_43_20191206_125800.ses”

120 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

W E

Hyperbolic trace

Figure 109. The detected pipeline in SBP data, line

“PETRONAS_001PETRONAS1_20191210_151734.ses”

S N

Hyperbolic trace

Figure 110. The detected pipeline in SBP data, line “PETRONAS_001Cr_Ptrns_58_20191206_161239.ses”

121 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Figure 111. SBP Survey Line at Crossing Area PHE30 – PPP Pipeline Route

S N

Hyperbolic trace Hyperbolic trace ORF

PHE30 – PPP to Bukit Tua Field
Pipeline Route
12” Pipeline Route

Figure 112. Crossing pipeline at line (a) “PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41c_20191206_212142.ses”

122 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

S N

Hyperbolic trace ORF Hyperbolic trace

to Bukit Tua Field PHE30 – PPP
Pipeline Route
12” Pipeline Route

Figure 113. Crossing pipeline at line (b) “PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41e_20191206_222403.ses”

123 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

N S

Hyperbolic trace Hyperbolic trace ORF

PHE30 – PPP to Bukit Tua Field
Pipeline Route
12” Pipeline Route

Figure 114. Crossing pipeline at line (c) “PETRONAS 001cr-pipe41b_20191206_211237.ses”

ORF to Bukit Tua Field Pipeline Route CPP - ORF 14" Pipeline Route
No File Name
Easting (mE) Northing (mN) Burial Depth (m) Easting (mE) Northing (mN) Burial Depth (m)
1 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_c_20191207_125433.ses 691735.78 9254204.09 -0.1 691708.90 9254268.52 0.0
2 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_e_20191207_130659.ses 691658.31 9254194.55 -0.3 691653.51 9254220.08 0.0
3 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_b_20191207_124928.ses 691550.36 9254203.69 -0.2 691554.59 9254139.72 0.0
4 PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_d_20191207_130201.ses 691472.78 9254193.99 -0.1 691497.50 9254078.40 0.0

124 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

a
b

c
d

Survey Line

Figure 115. SBP Survey Line at Crossing Area CPP - ORF Pipeline Route

125 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

N S

Hyperbolic trace CPP - Hyperbolic trace ORF

ORF to Bukit Tua Field
Pipeline Route
14” Pipeline Route

Figure 116. Crossing pipeline at line (b) “PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_e_20191207_130659.ses”

126 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

S N

Hyperbolic trace CPP - Hyperbolic trace ORF

ORF to Bukit Tua Field
Pipeline Route
14” Pipeline Route

Figure 117. Crossing pipeline at line (c) “PETRONAS 001cr_pipe65_b_20191207_124928.ses”

ORF to Bukit Tua Field Pipeline Route 18" HESS Gas Pipeline Route
No File Name
Easting (mE) Northing (mN) Burial Depth (m) Easting (mE) Northing (mN) Burial Depth (m)
1 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS1_20191210_151734.ses 688665.00 9238051.89 0.7 688666.98 9238052.01 0.6
2 PETRONAS 001PETRONAS_20191209_131155_CH.ses 688664.63 9237699.39 0.3 689039.63 9237631.57 0.4

127 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
17. APPENDIX 03 MULTIBEAM ECHOSOUNDER INSPECTION

KP 80 Multibeam Survey, Depth 16-18 meter

Figure 118 Multibeam coverage at KP 80

KP 85 Multibeam Survey, Depth 6-7 meter

Figure 119 Multibeam coverage at KP 85

128 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP 90 Multibeam Survey, Depth 7-8 meter

Figure 120 Multibeam coverage at KP 90

KP 95 Multibeam Survey, Depth 9-10 meter

Figure 121. Multibeam coverage at KP 95

129 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

KP 100 Multibeam Survey, Depth 4-15 meter Cannot approach line because of fishnet
Figure 122. Multibeam coverage at KP 100

KP 105 Multibeam Survey, Depth 12 meter

Figure 123. Multibeam coverage at KP 105

130 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
18. APPENDIX 04 CATODIC PROTECTION INSPECTION

Section 1 : KP 12+300 to KP 17+100 12” Export pipeline from BTJT A to ORF

Inspection Date : 24 November 2019
Time : 08:28 to 13:12 (GMT+7)

Summary
- Cell to cell CP reading at 12” export pipeline KP 12+300 to KP 17+100
- Pipeline condition by ROV Visual 80% buried
- Base potential reading refer to measured potential Riser on BTJT A WHP 50 m
depth, 960 –mV/AgAgCl
- Highest potential reading 969 -mV
- Lowest potential reading 926 -mV

Potential Reading Chart

CP Reading 12" Export Pipeline

KP 12+300 - 17+100
1.000
0.950
0.900
0.850
Potential, -V

0.800
0.750 Potential
0.700 Criteria
0.650
0.600
0.550
0.500
KP 12.300 - 17.100

Section 2 : KP 17+100 to KP 18+100 12” Export pipeline from BTJT A to ORF

Inspection Date : 24 November 2019
Time : 18:30 to 19:16 (GMT+7)

Summary
- Cell to cell CP reading at 12” export pipeline KP 17+100 to KP 18+100
- Pipeline condition by ROV Visual 80% buried

131 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
- Base potential reading refer to measured potential Riser on BTJT A WHP 50 m
depth, 960 –mV/AgAgCl
- Highest potential reading 938 -mV
- Lowest potential reading 921 -mV

Potential Reading Chart

CP Reading 12" Export Pipeline

KP 17+100 - 18+100
1.000
0.950
0.900
0.850
Potential (-V)

0.800
0.750 Potential
0.700 Criteria
0.650
0.600
0.550
0.500
KP 17.100 - 18.100

Section 3 : KP 18+080 to KP 18+580 12” Export pipeline from BTJT A to ORF

Inspection Date : 25 November 2019
Time : 07:43 to 08:30 (GMT+7)

Summary
- Cell to cell CP reading at 12” export pipeline KP 18+080 to KP 18+580
- Pipeline condition by ROV Visual 80% buried
- Base potential reading refer to measured potential Riser on BTJT A WHP 50 m
depth, 960 –mV/AgAgCl
- Highest potential reading 948 -mV
- Lowest potential reading 939 -mV

132 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

Potential Reading Chart

CP Reading 12" Export Pipeline

KP 18+080 - 18+580
1.000
0.950
0.900
0.850
Potential (-V)

0.800
0.750 Potential
0.700 Criteria
0.650
0.600
0.550
0.500
KP 18.080 - 18.580

Section 4 : KP 18+580 to KP 18+860 12” Export pipeline from BTJT A to ORF

Inspection Date : 25 November 2019
Time : 09:28 to 09:52 (GMT+7)

Summary
- Cell to cell CP reading at 12” export pipeline KP 18+580 to KP 18+860
- Pipeline condition by ROV Visual 80% buried
- Base potential reading refer to measured potential Riser on BTJT A WHP 50 m
depth, 960 –mV/AgAgCl
- Highest potential reading 948 -mV
- Lowest potential reading 944 -mV

133 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
Potential Reading Chart

CP Reading 12" Export Pipeline

KP 18+580 - 18+860
1.000
0.950
0.900
0.850
Potential (-V)

0.800
0.750 Potential
0.700 Criteria
0.650
0.600
0.550
0.500
KP 18.580 - 18.860

Drop Cell to Cell Spot CP Reading

Pipeline : 12” Export pipeline from BTJT A to ORF
Inspection Date : 2 - 11 December 2019
Measurement Position :
- KP 70+000
- KP 55+000
- KP 30+000
- KP 0+600
- KP 81+000
- KP 83+000
- KP 90+000
- KP 100+000

134 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT
KP 105+00Potential Reading Chart

CP Reading
12" Export Pipeline
1000.0 962.0 957.8 955.2 965.5 956.1 953.2 972.9 955.6 957.4
950.0
900.0
Potential (-mV)

850.0
800.0
750.0
700.0
650.0 Potential
600.0 Criteria
550.0
500.0

KP

Trailing Wire Continuous CP Reading

Pipeline : 12” Export pipeline from BTJT A to ORF

Inspection Date : 13 December 2019
Time : 15:45 to 17:00 (GMT+7)
Measurement Position : KP 105+000 to Landfall ORF

Summary
- Trailing wire CP reading at 12” export pipeline KP 105+000 to Landfall ORF
- Highest potential reading 1024 -mV
- Lowest potential reading 958 –Mv

135 | P a g e
 GEOPHYSYCAL SURVEY
FINAL REPORT

19. ATTACHMENT

• Letter of Completion
• Mobillization & Demobilization
• Daily Operation Report

136 | P a g e