Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Description of Competency
“This competency covers the quantity surveyor’s involvement with
the avoidance, management and resolution of disputes in
construction projects. Candidates should be aware of the various
processes and techniques commonly used in the industry. They
should have a detailed understanding of how these are applied in
practice.”
(RICS APC Pathway Guide, February 2015 – Quantity Surveying and Construction)
Level 2
Provide evidence of practical application in your area of practice having
regard to the relevant law.
Level 3
Provide evidence of the application of the above in the context of advising
clients in various circumstances.
(RICS APC Pathway Guide, February 2015 – Quantity Surveying and Construction)
• Conflict avoidance
• Partnering
• Negotiation
• Mediation
• Conciliation
• Adjudication
• Arbitration
• Pre-action Protocol
• Litigation
• Expert Witness
What is Conflict?
“1. A situation which people, group or countries are involved in a
serious disagreement or argument,
Pre-Contract Post-Contract
Stage Stage
Pre-Contract Stage
Have a carefully drawn up set of Contract documents at the
beginning of the project to ensure that there is no or minimum
ambiguity.
• Provide proper answers for tender queries & distribute them to all tenderers
Post-Contract Stage
Administrate the Contract by fully competent Contract
Administrators, in accordance with the Contract Agreement .
What is Dispute?
“An argument or a disagreement between two people, group or
countries”
(Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary)
Litigation
Dispute Resolution
Procedures
Alternative Dispute
Resolution
Litigation:
The process of resolving disputes by filing or answering
a complaint through the public court system
When to Litigate
• Where negotiations have proved unsuccessful and there is no right of
adjudication (in UK) and/or Arbitration; or
Pre-action Protocol
• to agree a pre-requisite procedure before commencing the litigation.
These include:
Common Advantages of ADR
• Mediation
• Adjudication Confidentiality
No or less destruction of any goodwill and
• Arbitration
business relationship between parties
• Dispute Boards
• Expert Determination
(RICS, 2014)
• Negotiation
• Conciliation
Mediation:
Conciliation:
Similar to mediation but the independent third party (conciliator) gives his/her
opinion on the dispute.
Expert Determination:
An independent expert is appointed jointly by the two parties to give an expert
opinion on the matter to be decided. The expert may have regard to evidence
submitted or may have a hearing and adopt what they consider to be the most
appropriate procedure. The expert's decision is not enforceable directly by the
courts and they are liable for action for negligence.
(http://www.isurv.com, 2013)
A dispute board acts in ‘real time’ as compared to dealing with events now
which occurred in the far distance past such as in court proceedings and
arbitrations.
The Adjudicator must generally decide the dispute in less than 42 days.
The decision is binding and is usually upheld by the Courts in the UK. The
scope of adjudication is set out in the provisions of the Housing Grants,
Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
No international enforceability
an impartial tribunal, which emanates from the agreement of the parties but
which is regulated and enforced by the state”
(Latham & Watkins (2014), “Guide to International Arbitration”)
The arbitral tribunal can be made up of legal and/or industry experts chosen
by the parties or appointed by a professional body that has been requested
to do so by the parties.
It can provide for the quick, practical and economical settlement of cross-
border disputes.
Prior to the UAE's accession to the New York Convention, the enforcement of
foreign awards before the UAE courts was, save the application of relevant bi-
lateral or other multilateral conventions , subject to the application of Article
235 of Federal Law No.11 of 1992 (the UAE Civil Procedures Code), which
governs the enforcement of foreign judgments in the UAE.
Pursuant to Article 235, UAE courts were empowered to, and in practice did
refuse, the enforcement of foreign awards on grounds such as:
(Gordon Blanke (2012), “Enforcement Of New York Convention Awards: Are The UAE Courts
Coming Of Age?”)
YC, Jan 2017
Dispute Resolution Procedures
Enforcement Of Foreign Arbitration Awards in the UAE:
• The New Approach - Relevant Cases:
In a ruling dated 27 April 2010 , the Fujairah Federal Court of First Instance
enforced two awards, one on the merits of the case and the other on costs,
issued by a Sole Arbitrator in London under the Rules of the London Maritime
Arbitration Association (LMAA) following an application for enforcement by the
award creditor under the terms of the New York Convention.
In a ruling dated 12 January 2011, the Dubai Court of First Instance enforced
two arbitration awards, one on the merits of the case and one on costs, issued
by a Sole Arbitrator in London under the DIFC-LCIA Arbitration Rules following
an application for enforcement by the award creditor under the New York
Convention.
The case involved two Dubai based companies, one licensed as a free zone
company and the other an LLC. The award debtor objected to the enforcement
of the awards, seeking nullification on a number of procedural grounds.
"The court's supervisory role when looking to recognize and enforce a foreign
arbitral award is strictly to ensure that it does not conflict with the Federal
Decree under which the UAE acceded to the New York Convention on the
recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards and satisfied the
requirement of Articles IV and V of the Decree in terms of being duly
authenticated".
Once the award debtor appealed this ruling before the Dubai Court of Appeal
arguing that the "judgment is vitiated by the error in the application of the Law
and insufficient reasoning". The Court of Appeal confirmed that it was satisfied
with the reasoning of the Court of First Instance.
After referring to the Dubai Court of Cassation (Commercial Appeal No. 132 of
2012 ) it upheld the lower courts’ decision enforcing a foreign arbitral award .
The Court held, among other things, that:
“The effect of Federal Decree No. 43 of 2006 (under which the UAE acceded to
the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
Arbitral Awards) is that all UAE Courts shall recognize and enforce such awards
in the territory where the award is relied upon.”
(Gordon Blanke (2012), “Enforcement Of New York Convention Awards: Are The UAE Courts
Coming Of Age?”)
If the number is not stated and the Parties do not agree otherwise, the DAB
shall comprise three persons.
If the DAB is to comprise three persons, each Party shall nominate one
member for the approval of the other Party.
The Parties shall consult both these members and shall agree upon the third
member, who shall be appointed to act as chairman.
Upon the request of either or both the Parties and after due
consultation with both Parties, this entity or the official shall appoint
the DAB.
Decision
Decision become final
and binding
Reference of Evaluation
dispute by (84 days or as
either Party approved) Notice of
DAB fails to dissatisfaction
give a within 28 days
decision
When a dispute arises and there is no DAB in place, whether by reason of the
expiry of the DAB’s appointment or otherwise, Sub-Clause 20.4 and Sub-
Clause 20.5 shall not apply. The dispute may be referred directly to
arbitration under Sub-Clause 20.6
• Conflict avoidance
• Partnering
• Negotiation
• Mediation
• Conciliation
• Adjudication
• Arbitration
• Pre-action Protocol
• Litigation
• Expert Witness
Questions ?
Many Thanks !