Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
State of Company’s Affairs- S 134(3)(I): The Directors’ report starts with the
financial results of the year which will show the working results for the year
under review, the Net Profit Before Tax (PBT) and the Net Profit After Tax
(PAT) and the appropriation of profit including the transfer to general reserve
which has been left to the Director to decide.
The Report will mention yearly total Sales Turnover and Income and Point out
any problems faced by the company which have affected the profits and
measures which have been taken to improve the working and reduce costs.-
The web address, if any, where annual return referred to in sub-section (3) of
section 92 has been placed]
There is required to disclose by director in Board’s Report all the related party
transaction entered along with the justification for entering into such contract
and arrangement by the company during financial year.
The name of Company which has become or ceased to be its subsidiaries, Joint
Venture or associate company during the year
8. Details of Directors/ KMP/ appointed/ resigned during the year As per Section
134(3)(q) r/w Rule 8(5)(iii) of Companies (Account) Rules, 2014
The report of the Board of Directors shall state the amount which it proposes to
carry to any reserve in the Balance Sheet like debenture redemption reserve in
terms of Section 71(13) etc.
The report of the Board shall contain the following information and details,
namely:-
A. Conservation of energy–
a. the steps taken or impact on conservation of energy;
b. the steps taken by the company for utilizing alternate sources of
energy;
c. the capital investment on energy conservation equipments;
B. Technology absorption-
a. the efforts made towards technology absorption;
b. the benefits derived like product improvement, cost reduction,
product development or import substitution;
c. in case of imported technology (imported during the last three
years reckoned from the beginning of the financial year)-
i. the details of technology imported;
ii. the year of import;
iii. whether the technology been fully absorbed;
iv. if not fully absorbed, areas where absorption has not
taken place, and the reasons thereof; and
d. the expenditure incurred on Research and Development.
20 COST RECORD
Note: All the above disclosures are applicable to all companies except “one person
company” and small company. In case of one person company and small company only
selected disclosures from the above are applicable.
Disclosure and Reporting (Section 92): In the new Act, there is significant transformation
in non-financial annual disclosures and reporting by companies as compared to the earlier
format in the Companies Act, 1956.
Details of the registered office, principal business activities, particulars of its holding,
subsidiary and associate companies;
Details of shares, debentures and other securities and shareholding pattern; its
indebtedness;
Details of members and debenture-holders along with changes therein since the close
of the previous financial year;
Its promoters, directors, key managerial personnel along with changes therein since
the close of the previous financial year; meetings of members or a class thereof,
Board and its various committees along with attendance details; remuneration of
directors and key managerial personnel; penalty or punishment imposed on the
company,
Details of the directors or officers and details of compounding of offences and appeals
made against such penalty or punishment;
Ownership structure
The prevailing ownership pattern is a crucial impediment in raising corporate
governance standards in India. There are two sets of issues pertaining to the
ownership structure of the listed companies in India.
For example, the share of promoters in NSE listed companies rose from 47.7 percent
in March 2002 to 57.8 percent in March 2010, but fell subsequently to 53.7 percent in
March 2013. The picture is not very different for the top companies.
Second, a large number of companies in India are grouped together under the
common control of a single shareholder or family. In other words, not only are most
firms effectively controlled by a promoter group, but the same promoter group often
controls a large number of firms. This pattern of ownership poses challenges for
improving governance, partly because it raises probability of price manipulation.
Also, by making it easier for the controlling shareholders to use related party
transactions (RPTs) as a vehicle for illegitimate expropriation of corporate value at
the cost of minority shareholders’ interest, this pattern of ownership gives rise to
serious potential conflicts of interest between the promoter group and the minority
investors. So what is the answer?
Partly with the aim of addressing this situation, the minimum public shareholding
norms were prescribed in August 2010. Accordingly, the listed private and public
sector companies existing as of the date of the circular were required to ensure a
minimum public shareholding of 25 percent (by June 2013) and 10 percent (by
August 2013) respectively.
(v) A public company in which a director or manager is a director and holds along with his
relatives, more than 2% of its paid-up share capital
(vi) A body corporate whose board, managing director or manager is accustomed to act in
accordance with the advice, directions or instructions of a director or manager, except if
advice/ directions/ instructions are given in the professional capacity
RPT contracts
The new Act requires that no company should enter into RPT contracts pertaining to —
(e) appointment of any agent for purchase or sale of goods, materials, services or property;
(f) such related party's appointment to any office or place of profit in the company, its
subsidiary company or associate company.
In case such a contract or arrangement is entered into with a related party, it must be referred
to in the Board’s Report along with the justification for entering into such contract or
arrangement. Further, any RPT between a company and its Directors shall require prior
approval by a resolution in general meeting. Violations of these provisions would be
punishable with fine or imprisonment or both.
The new Act provides that the company can have a maximum of 15 directors on the Board;
appointing more than 15 directors, however, will require shareholder approval.
Further, the new Act prescribes both academic and professional qualifications for directors.
In addition, for the first time, duties of directors have been defined in the Act. The Act
considerably enhances the roles and responsibilities of the Board of Directors and makes
them more accountable. Infringement of these provisions has been made punishable with
fine.
ii. Independent Director (Section 149): The concept of independent directors (IDs) has
been introduced for the first time in the Company Law in India. It prescribes that all listed
companies must have at least one-third of the Board as IDs. IDs may be appointed for a
term of up to five consecutive years. While the introduction of the concept of IDs in the new
Act is a welcome move, it does not appear to sufficiently address the enduring challenges
related to the effectiveness of IDs in the context of concentrated shareholding pattern in most
of the listed companies in India.
Independent Director-
Interested Director
Section 184 talks about disclosure of interest of director. (a) The director is said to be an
“interested director” if: (i) The director, himself or; his,
(ii) Relatives;
(iii) Firm;
(iv) Body corporate;
(v) Other association of individuals;
Disclosure:
1. The director shall disclose his concern or interest in any company or companies or
bodies corporate, firms, or other association of individuals, including his
shareholding, if any, by giving a notice in writing. The director shall not participate
at the meeting of the Board in which such a contract or arrangement is discussed
in which the director is interested.
2. Every Company shall maintain one or more registers furnishing particulars of
company or companies or bodies corporate, firms, or other association of
individuals in which the director is, directly or indirectly, interested.
CSR committee
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) (Section 135): The new Act has mandated the profit
making companies to spend on CSR related activities. Every company having net worth of
Rs. 500 crore or more or turnover of Rs. 1000 crore or more or net profit of Rs. 5 crore or
more during any financial year shall constitute a CSR Committee of the Board. In pursuance
of its CSR policy, the Board of every such company–through these committees--shall ensure
that the company spends (in every financial year) at least 2 percent of the average net profits
of the company made during the three immediately preceding financial years.
Audit Committee
Companies Act states that the majority of members of Audit Committee including its
Chairperson should have the ability to read and understand the financial statements.
A listed company cannot appoint or reappoint (a) an individual as auditor for more than one
term of five consecutive years, or (b) an audit firm as auditor for more than two terms of five
consecutive years. To avoid any conflict of interest, the Act has mentioned the services that
an auditor cannot render, directly or indirectly, to the company, which include: accounting
and book-keeping services, internal audit, investment banking services, investment advisory
services, management services etc.
The Audit Committee shall consist of a minimum of 3 directors with independent directors
forming a majority.
company law, capital market and taxation for detecting and prosecuting or recommending for
prosecution white-collar crimes/frauds.
Investigation report of SFIO filed with the Court for framing of charges shall be treated as a
report filed by a Police Officer. SFIO shall have power to arrest in respect of certain offences
of the Act, which attract the punishment for fraud. Further, the new Act has a provision for
stringent penalty for fraud related offences.
For the first time, a provision has been made for class action under which it is provided that
specified number of member(s), depositor(s) or any class of them, may file an application
before the Tribunal seeking any damage or compensation or demand any other suitable
action against an BODs/audit firm, if they are of the opinion that the management or
conduct of the affairs of the company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the
interests of the company or its members or depositors. The order passed by the Tribunal
shall be binding on all the stakeholders including the company and all its members,
depositors and auditors.
Company,
Any of its directors
Auditor, including audit firm
Expert or advisor or consultant or any other person