WSP Post-Installed Rebar

06.12.
2019
DESIGN FOR POST-

INSTALLED REBAR
WSP Singapore Pte Ltd
Alan Tan
Lead Specification Engineer
4 Dec 2019
AGENDA
1. Intro to HILTI
2. Why are we here?
3. Code and Regulation for Fastening

4. Approval - Product Selection
5. Design - Key Difference Between Anchor and Rebar

6. Services – Execution, Installation, Inspection, Testing
Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019
1
06.12.2019
INTERNATIONAL ENTERPRISE
Creation
In 1941 in Schaan, Liechtenstein
Family business
All shares are held by Martin Hilti Family Trust
Know-how
Leader in the design, manufacture and marketing of
products for building professionals
Global reach
Established in more that 120 countries
International team
More than 24 000 employees worldwide
Unique model
Direct sales
2
06.12.2019
A GLOBAL PRODUCTION NETWORK
Diamond B
Consumables Plant Shanghai
Intelligent Construction Tools Tools
Geosystems (JV Trimble) R&D
Plant Zhanjiang
Consumables Panasonic (JV)
Cordless drivers
Plant Matamoros Racing Point (JV)

Consumables Consumables
Plant Schaan Plant Kaufering Plant Thüringen Plant Kecskemét

Tools Consumables Tools Consumables
Consumables Plant Strass Consumables Hilti Manufacturing Hilti Mining Engineering
Technical centre Tools Eurofox India Hilti Tendon Technologies
R&D Consumables Façade fastening systems Consumables (JV Westlakes Mining)
Hilti Development
Corporation
R&D
Hillos GmbH
Laser measuring systems
(JV Jenoptik)
PRESENT ON DIVERSIFIED MARKET SEGMENTS
Building Civil Steel & Interior Mechanical

Construction Engineering Metal Finishing Installation
Energy & Industry
Electrical Diamond Natural Solar Energy

Installation Contractors Resources
3
06.12.2019
SOLUTIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Drilling & Cutting, Fastening and Firestop & fire
Engineering Measuring demolation sawing installation protection, Services
grinding chemicals
• Design • Telemetry • Hammer drills, • Cutting & • Direct fastening • Foams • Professional trainings
hammers, breakers grinding
• Specifications • Leveling and • Diamond drilling & • Diamond • Screw fastening • Firestop • Onsite test
alignment sawing coring & solutions
sawing
• Technical advice • Detection • Installation • Logistic
• Anchor systems • Finance & administration
• Engineering services
• Tool services
Software Software
HILTI SERVICES EASING YOUR DAILY WORK

By telephone/internet At your office On the jobsite
Consulting
Technical documentation General technical support sessions On site support On-site test
Kitting, cutting,
Typical details Engineering judgement Trainings Trainings
pre-assembly
Saving your time & effort and Giving you integrated Reducing installation time, overall cost
ensuring proper documentation business partner and project risks
4
06.12.2019
AGENDA
1. Intro to HILTI
2. Why are we here?
LIKE IN OTHER FIELDS OF LIFE, COMMON BAD PRACTICE

EXAMPLES ARE FOUND IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY
NOT understanding NOT using NOT choosing the best NOT complying with
requirements the best tool solution rules and guidelines
5
06.12.2019
BUT PROFESSIONAL DECISIONS DO NOT ALLOW DOUBTS

OR MISTAKES, CONSEQUENCES CAN BE VERY SERIOUS
RISK
OF LIFE
FATAL ACCIDENT 1 : NICHOLL HIGHWAY TEMPORARY

RETAINING WALL COLLAPSE (2004)
Background
A tunnel being constructed for use by MRT project
collapsed due to the supporting structure for the deep
excavation work failed.
Causes
• Under-designed of the supporting structure. Steel
struts supporting the excavation's diaphragm walls
failed to support the loading.
• Lack of on-site supervision.
Consequnces
• Four people died.
• Main contractor fined $121,400.
• Project delayed.
6
06.12.2019
FATAL ACCIDENT 2 : DOWNTOWN LINE BUGIS MRT STATION

SCAFFOLDING COLLAPSE (2012)
Background
Workers were casting concrete into the formwork when
the scaffolding collapsed. The accident happened more
than 12m deep underground.
Causes
• Subcon failed to ensure the formwork inspected and
certified by PE before concrete casting.
• The erection of scaffolding was not according to the
PE design.
Consequnces
• 2 workers were buried in concrete and died.
• Subcon fined $100,000.
• Project delayed.
FATAL ACCIDENT 3 : PIE VIADUCT COLLAPSE (2017)
Background
An investigation found that the permanent structures
used in the viaduct's construction were so inadequate
that they could have collapsed under the weight of a full
traffic load and cause a large number of casualties.
Causes
• Engineers failed to check the design assumptions
made for the corbels, which are support structures,
between affected vertical columns that collapsed.
Consequnces
• 11 workers fell to the ground from a height of at least
9m.
• Main Con still in trial, AC jailed, Subcontractor QP
jailed and fined
7
06.12.2019
TODAY WE WILL LEARN ABOUT DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS AND

GUIDELINES FOR FASTENING DESIGN
Understand Chose the Design them Save time &

requirements adequate correctly resources
solutions
THE 4 PILLARS OF FASTENING

4 KEY PILLARS
Codes Approvals Design Service
• Understanding of the • Min. requirement for • Design calculation in • Installed, supervised,

European Regulatory anchor to have an ETA accordance to ETAG 001 inspected (and, if needed,
Framework and local Approval, also with the Annex C (or forthcoming tested) by appropriately
regulations/codes of post right coverage (e.g Eurocode 2 Part 4) for PIA or qualified person
installed rebar and cracked base materials, EC2-1 for PIR
anchoring redundant fastening, fire,
etc
8
06.12.2019
AGENDA
1. Intro to HILTI
2. Why are we here?
4 KEY PILLARS

etc
9
06.12.2019
EUROPEAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR POST-

INSTALLED REBAR
“Rebar theory” “Anchor theory”

“Design of rebar as a rebar” “Design of rebar as an anchor”
Static Fire Seismic Static Fire Seismic
Product EAD 330499 TR 049

EAD
Qualification
CSTB regional CSTB/DIBt

Technical data ETA ETA ETA
approval regional approval
TR 029 TR 045
Design method EC2 EC2 based Local regulations
(EN 1992-4) (EN 1992-4)
10
06.12.2019
11
06.12.2019
12
06.12.2019
13
06.12.2019
AGENDA
1. Intro to HILTI
2. Why are we here?
4 KEY PILLARS

etc
14
06.12.2019
OK, I KNOW WHAT I WANT, BUT

HOW TO KNOW IF A PARTICULAR
PRODUCT MEETING ALL THE
CRITERIA?
15
06.12.2019
SAMPLE OF DIFFERENT ETA FOR THE SAME PRODUCT
AGENDA
1. Intro to HILTI
2. Why are we here?


16
06.12.2019
4 KEY PILLARS

etc
REBAR APPLICATIONS VS. ANCHOR APPLICATIONS
New concrete Rebar Anchor
Post-installed rebar
Steel plate
HIT-RE500 V3 HIT-RE 500 V3
Concrete
Old concrete
Anchor
Existing
reinforcement
17
06.12.2019
REBAR THEORY VS. ANCHOR THEORY: MAIN DIFFERENCES
“Rebar theory” “Anchor theory”

Post-installed rebar Bonded anchor
Load on the bar Tension (roughness of joint critical for the Tension, shear, combination of both
shear transfer)
Load transfer mechanism Equilibrium with local Utilization of concrete
or global concrete struts tensile strength
Failure modes Steel yielding, pull out, splitting Steel failure, concrete cone failure, pull out,
splitting
Design steps 1. Calculation of steel reinforcement 1. Calculation of all characteristic capacities
2. Calculation of required anchorage length 2. Determination of minimum capacity
controlling failure anchorage
‘‘Result of theory application’’ Anchorage length (lbd) Capacity of the anchor (NRk)
Minimum concrete cover According to EC2 According to ETA

(min (spacing; edge distance))
Allowable anchorage length lb,min ≥ max(0.3lbrqd,fyd; 10ϕ; 100mm) 4ϕ ≤ lb,min ≤ 20ϕ
Concrete Status of concrete cracked/uncracked is not Status of concrete, cracked/uncracked, is

directly considered in the design. Concrete is directly considered in the design.
usually considered uncracked.
THE PUBLICATION OF EC2-4 IS ALONG WITH THE

QUALIFICATION CODE STRUCTURE CHANGE (EAD)
Current system Transition period New system
Design Structure Structure

EN1992 EN1992
Qualification
EN1992-4: Anchor fastening
Anchor Anchor
ETAG Annex C
EAD-AM
ETAG001 Part1~6, EAD
Annex E, TR023…etc.
ETAG EAD-AC
EAD-Fatigue
Already used as “EAD” but New version EAD refers to
EAD-Fire…etc.
refers to ETAG Annex C EN1992-4
12.2016 ???
EAD (refers to EN1992-4 available), but EN1992-4 is not published;
not clear how will the new approvals in the period look like.
18
06.12.2019
TR 023 INCLUDES METHODS AND CRITERIA TO ASSESS

MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF POST-INSTALLED (P.I.) REBAR
V
M
N
Overlap joint for rebar connections Overlap joint at a foundation of a

of slabs and beams column or wall
End anchoring of slabs or beams Components stressed primarily in

(simply supported) compression
TR023 LIMITS P.I. REBAR TO APPLICATIONS WHERE

CONCRETE CONE CANNOT OCCUR
The compressive strut prevents the concrete cone failure

mode
38
19
06.12.2019
BASED ON TR 023 POST-INSTALLED REBAR PERFORMS AT

LEAST EQUAL TO CAST-IN
Cast-in rebars Post-installed rebars
concrete
mortar
rebar
rebar
concrete
Load is transferred by mechanical interlock provided by the At the mortar-concrete interface load is transferred by
ribs. The mechanical interlock leads to compression struts adhesion and micro-interlock due to roughness of the
which lead to rotational tensile stresses perpendicular to drilled hole surface. The stiffness of the mortar is
the loading direction. responsible for the crack surface of the pull-out.
39
DESIGN PROCESS OF POST-INSTALLED REBAR
1 2 3 4
Calculation of amount
Calculation of load Calculation of force per Calculation of the
of reinforcement
acting on the structure bar anchorage length
required
20
06.12.2019
THE ANCHORAGE LENGTH IS REQUIRED TO DEVELOP THE

STEEL STRESS AVOIDING CRACKING
Tension in the Bond strength:

Nrd = σsd·π·ϕ²/4 rebar: σsd fbd
External action
Fbd = fbd·π·lbd·ϕ lbd

The rebar is
anchored in Anchorage force
the concrete
where it is not
needed
anymore!
Equilibrium: Nrd = Fbd
41
THE BOND STRENGTH, FBD, IS AVAILABLE IN THE APPROVAL

AND IT IS LIMITED TO THE FBD OF CAST-IN
Fbd = fbd·π·Φ·lbd
fbd,EC2 = 2.25 η1 η2 fctd

Values of fbd are
η1 = coefficient related to the quality of the bond conditions reported in the rebar
and the position of the rebar during concreting approval related to the
specific product.
η2 = coefficient related to the bar diameter
fctd = design value of concrete tensile strength
(EC2:EN1992-1-1:2004 (8.4.2))
42
21
06.12.2019
THE ANCHORAGE LENGTH IS FUNCTION OF REQUIRED

ANCHORAGE LENGTH AND FACTORS a1
Fbd = fbd·π·Φ·lbd lbd = α1 α2 α3 α4 α5 lb,rqd ≥ lb,min
Bent or hooked bars Straight bars
α1 = 1
α1 = 0.7
(EC2:EN1992-1-1:2004 (8.4.4)
44
22
06.12.2019
a2 TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER

cd
Cast in rebars Post-installed rebars
Bent or hooked bars Straight bars
a
a
c1 c1
c
cd = min (a/2, c1) cd = min (a/2, c1, c)
0.7 ≤ α2 ≤ 1
0.7 ≤ α2 ≤ 1
(EC2:EN1992-1-1:2004 (8.4.4)
45
a3 TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE EFFECT OF CONFINEMENT

BY TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT
No confinement by transverse
reinforcement can be taken into account
α3 = 1
0.7 ≤ α3 ≤ 1
(EC2:EN1992-1-1:2004 (8.4.4)
46
23
06.12.2019
a4 TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE CONFINEMENT BY WELDED

TRANSVERSE REINFORCEMENT
Welded transverse reinforcemnt

is not feasible
α4 = 1
α4 = 1
(EC2:EN1992-1-1:2004 (8.4.4)
47
a5 TAKES INTO ACCOUNT THE CONFINEMENT BY

TRANSVERSE PRESSURE
Effect of confinement by Effect of confinement by

transverse pressure where p transverse pressure where p
(transverse pressure) has to be (transverse pressure) has to
guaranteed at ultimate limit state be guaranteed at ultimate limit
along lbd state along lbd
0.7 ≤ α5 ≤ 1 0.7 ≤ α5 ≤ 1
(EC2:EN1992-1-1:2004 (8.4.4)
48
24
06.12.2019
THE PRODUCT OF a2 a3 a5 IS LIMITED
α2 α3 α5 ≤ 0.7
α2 α3 α5 ≤ 0.7
• α2 takes into account the minimum concrete cover

• α3 takes into account the effect of confinement by transverse
reinforcement
• α5 takes into account the confinement by transvers pressure
(EC2:EN1992-1-1:2004 (8.4.4))
49
THE REQUIRED ANCHORAGE LENGTH IS FUNCTION OF

STRESS, OF DIAMETER AND OF BOND STRENGTH
lbd = α1 α2 α3 α4 α5 lb,rqd ≥ lb,min
lb,rqd = (ϕ/4)(σsd/fbd) lb,rqd = (ϕ/4)(σsd/fbd)
• σsd = the design stress of the rebar at • σsd = the design stress of the rebar at
the position from where the anchorage the position from where the anchorage
is measured fbd = the bond strength of is measured fbd = the bond strength of
cast-in rebars post-installed rebars
• ϕ = rebar diameter • ϕ = diameter
(EC2:EN1992-1-1:2004 (8.4.3)
50
25
06.12.2019
THE DESIGN ANCHORAGE LENGTH MUST BE LONGER THAN

THE MINIMUM ANCHORAGE LENGTH ACC. TO EC2
lbd = α1 α2 α3 α4 α5 lb,rqd ≥ lb,min
lb,min=max(0.3lbrqd,fyd;10ϕ;100mm)  lb,min=max(0.3lbrqd,fyd;10ϕ;100mm) 
end bars end bars
In most of the cases the minimum

anchorage length must be amplified by a
factor of 1.5 when the diamond core drilling
is used.
(EC2:EN1992-1-1:2004 (8.4.4)
51
QUIZ : FIND “X”
26
06.12.2019
QUIZ : FIND “X”
WHAT ABOUT MOMENT

CONNECTION?
27
06.12.2019
WHAT IS HIT REBAR DESIGN METHOD?

HIT Rebar Design Method 55
CONTENTS
• 1.0 Use an higher bond strength
• 2.0 Moment resisting node

• 3.0 When the HIT Rebar Design Method does not provide benefits

28
06.12.2019
CONTENTS


TR023 LIMITS THE DESIGN BOND STRENGTH OF POST-

INSTALLED REBARS TO THAT OF CAST-IN REBARS
Splitting domain Pull-out domain

Bond strength, fbd,EC2 [N/mm²]
Effective limit on bond for EC2
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
cd/ϕ [-]
fbd,EC2 = fbd/α2 [EC2:EN1992-1-1:2004]
29
06.12.2019
…BUT WE KNOW THAT HILTI MORTAR HAS A HIGHER BOND

STRENGTH WITH INCREASING CONCRETE COVER
Post-installed rebar with

large concrete cover
Cast-in rebar with large

concrete cover
Bond strength [N/mm2]
Post-installed rebar with Cast-in rebar with small

small concrete cover concrete cover
Displacement [mm]
HILTI’S HIT-RE 500 V3 AND HIT-HY 200 PERFORM BETTER

THAN CAST-IN
Tests have shown that for HIT-HY 200 and for

HIT-RE 500 V3 the bond strength is much
higher than cast-in.
30
06.12.2019
HILTI DEVELOPED THE HIT REBAR DESIGN METHOD (HRM)

TO USE THE HIGHER BOND STRENGTH OF HILTI’S MORTARS
Extension for post-installed rebars with large concrete

cover (product dependent) limited by the bond strength
of adhesive. Based on Hilti own testing. Pull out bond strength
Bond strength, fbd,EC2 fbd,Hilti [N/mm²]
based on bond strength from anchor approval

(product dependent)*

Approval
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
cd/ϕ [-]
fbd,EC2 = fbd/α2 1 *: bond strength for cracked concrete: cracks parallel to the rebar; bond strength for uncracked
α2’=
1 +δ·cd−3ϕ concrete: cracks perpendicular to the rebar
fbd,Hilti = fbd/α’2 0.7 ϕ
HIT REBAR DESIGN METHOD (HRM): REDUCTION OF THE

ANCHORAGE LENGTH FOR CD/Φ >3
Anchorage length, lbd,EC2 lbd,HRM [mm]
Pull out acc. to EC2 (HIT-RE 500, C20/C25 and ϕ=20mm)
Extension for post-installed rebars with large concrete

cover (product dependent) limited by the bond strength of
adhesive. Based on Hilti own testing.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
cd/ϕ [-]
lbd,EC2=(ϕ/4)(fyd/fbd,EC2)
lbd,HRM=(ϕ/4)(fyd/fbd,Hilti)
31
06.12.2019
DESIGN A POST-INSTALLED REBAR ACCORDING TO HIT

REBAR DESIGN METHOD FOLLOWING THE EC2 DESIGN
EC2 restricts the use of bond strength to

that of cast-in.
HIT Rebar Method through Hilti’s extensive in-house research provided benefit
for cd/ϕ > 3
It allows higher bond strength thus reducing embedment depths

THE RESULTS ARE PUBLISHED IN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS

AND CONFERENCES
Kunz, J., Münger, F., : Splitting and bond failure of post-installed

rebar splices and anchorings. International conference on
Bond in concrete – from research to standards, Januar 2002
Randl, N., Kunz, J., : Post-installed reinforcement connections at

ultimate and serviceability limit states. Technical paper, DOI:
10.1002 / suco.201300094, Januar 2002
Randl, N., Kunz, J., : Concrete splitting for Rebars Post-Installed

with High Bond Adhesives

32
06.12.2019
CONTENTS


TR023 LIMITS THE APPLICATIONS TO CASES WHERE THE

CONCRETE CONE FAILURE IS PREVENTED
V
M
N
Overlap joint for rebar connections Overlap joint at a foundation of a Anchoring of reinforcement to
of slabs and beams column or wall cover the line of acting tensile
force
End anchoring of slabs or beams Components stressed primarily in Components subjected to

(simply supported) compression bending moment

33
06.12.2019
AN EXTENSIVE EXPERIMENTAL AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS

IS THE BASE OF THE STRUT AND TIE MODEL
Tests Finite Element Analysis Strut and tie model
30° ≤ θ ≤ 60°
Only the main struts are shown
The force flow in the frame node The strut and tie model is developed for straight bars
(Hilti research with Technical University of Munich and the American (Hilti research), showing that this application can also
University of Beirut ). be designed according to EC2 approach.

TOGETHER WITH TU MUNICH, HILTI HAS DEVELOPED

FRAME NODE (STRUT AND TIE) FOR STRAIGHT BARS
N1
M1
V1
N1
M1
2
V1
C

34
06.12.2019

N1
M1
V1
N1
M1
2
V1
C


N1
M1
V1
N1
M1
2
V1
C

35
06.12.2019

N1
M1
V1
N1
M1
2
V1
C

THE RESULTS ARE PUBLISHED IN SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS

AND CONFERENCES
Kupfer, H., Münger, F., Kunz, J.,

Jähring, A. : Nachträglich
verankerte gerade
Bewehrungsstäbe bei
Rahmenknoten. Bauingenieur,
Kunz, J., Münger, F., : Bonded-in
Band 78, Januar 2003
reinforcement for frame node
connections. International
conference on Bond in concrete
– from research to standards,
Januar 2002
Hamad, B.S., Al-Hammoud, R.,

Kunz, J.: Evaluation of Bond
Strength of Bonded-In or Post-
Installed Reinforcement. ACI
Structural Journal, V. 103, No. 2,
March–April 2006.

36
06.12.2019
CONTENTS


OVERLAPPING APPLICATIONS
Slab extension Beam extension
37
06.12.2019
IN OVERLAP SPLICES THE LOAD IS TRANSFERRED FROM

BARS TO BARS BY MEANS OF CONCRETE STRUTS
lbd
The load transfer between bars is

performed by means of
compressive struts in the
concrete. The resulting
perpendicular forces act as
splitting forces. The splitting
forces are taken up by the
transverse reinforcement.
In case of splices, stiffness is key. If two rebars with a similar stiffness are spliced, the steel stress values are
nearly identical for both bars.
On contrary if the mortar has a stiffness much higher than concrete, the steel stress distribution is unequal
along the splice length and large cracks can be developed.
WHY CANNOT THE ANCHORAGE LENGTH BE FURTHER

REDUCED IN SPLICE APPLICATIONS?
38
06.12.2019

REDUCED IN SPLICE
Proper design
Cast-in rebars
F
Post-installed rebars
lbd
Improper design
Cast-in rebars
F
lbd

REDUCED IN SPLICE
Proper design
Cast-in rebars
F
lbd
Improper design
Cast-in rebar
Cast-in rebars breaks out for
pull out!
F
lbd
39
06.12.2019
ON-SITE CONFINED PULL-OUT

TEST TO PROVE STEEL YIELD?
Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019 79
40
06.12.2019
41
06.12.2019
USE HILTI PROFIS SOFTWARE IN ORDER TO FIND

SOLUTIONS FOR BOTH COMPLEX AND EASY PROBLEMS...
Design post-installed rebar

connections according to
EC2/TR023 or HRM using
the Profis Rebar Software
EC2 or HIT
Rebar
design
Method
Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019 83
AGENDA
1. Intro to HILTI
2. Why are we here?


42
06.12.2019
4 KEY PILLARS

etc
1. SHARP AND CLEAR DESIGN

INTENT, ASSUMPTIONS, AND DETAILS
ON DRAWING/SPECIFICATIONS
43
06.12.2019
CLEARLY SPECIFIED THE INTENT, DETAILS, AND

ASSUMPTIONS TO FACILITATE CHANGE MANAGEMENT …
…. & EQUIVALENCY SOLELY BASED ON ETA DETAILS
44
06.12.2019
WHAT ARE THE NEEDED PERFORMANCE LEVEL / FEATURES

BE ASSESSED IN ETA?
ON-SITE PULL-OUT (OR LOCAL LAB) TESTING TO REPLACE

ETA?
45
06.12.2019
# ALWAYS REFER TO ETA FOR THE RIGHT PRODUCT FOR

THE RIGHT APPLICATIONS, AND AS THE BASIS OF FINDING
EQUIVALENT PRODUCTS
# NEVER EVER USE ON-SITE POT TO JUSTIFY PRODUCT

FITNESS OF USE NOR DESIGN.
2. TRAINED SUPERVISOR,
INSTALLER & INSPECTOR
46
06.12.2019
EXAMPLES OF BAD INSTALLATION
47
06.12.2019
TRAINED INSTALLER
TRAINED SUPERVISOR & INSPECTOR : VISUAL CHECKING:

GOOD & BAD INSTALLATIONS OF HSC-A
48
06.12.2019
3. RIGHT TOOLS & ACCESSORIES
FERRO SCANNING –AVOID CUTTING THROUGH EXISTING

REBARS
49
06.12.2019
LET’S SEE A QUICK VIDEO
4. (OPTIONAL)WORKMANSHIP
CHECK VIA ON-SITE ‘PROOF LOAD
TEST’
50
06.12.2019
IN 2014, BCA RELEASED CIRCULAR ON BS8539 FOR POST

INSTALLED ANCHOR USAGE AND APPROVAL
ALLOWABLE RESISTANCE VS. WORKMANSHIP
51
06.12.2019
THANK YOU
Contact
Alan Tan (Specification Engineer)
Hilti Far East Pte Ltd

20 Harbour Drive
#06-06, Singapore 117612
Tel: +65 9878 6280

alan.tan@hilti.com
www.hilti.com.sg
52

WSP Post-Installed Rebar

Hochgeladen von

Dokumentinformationen

Originaltitel

Copyright

Verfügbare Formate

Dieses Dokument teilen

Dokument teilen oder einbetten

Freigabeoptionen

Stufen Sie dieses Dokument als nützlich ein?

Sind diese Inhalte unangemessen?

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

WSP Post-Installed Rebar

Hochgeladen von

Copyright:

Verfügbare Formate

06.12.

DESIGN FOR POST-

2. Why are we here?

3. Code and Regulation for Fastening

5. Design - Key Difference Between Anchor and Rebar

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

A GLOBAL PRODUCTION NETWORK

Plant Matamoros Racing Point (JV)

Plant Schaan Plant Kaufering Plant Thüringen Plant Kecskemét

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

PRESENT ON DIVERSIFIED MARKET SEGMENTS

Building Civil Steel & Interior Mechanical

Energy & Industry

Electrical Diamond Natural Solar Energy

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

SOLUTIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

HILTI SERVICES EASING YOUR DAILY WORK

5. Design - Key Difference Between Anchor and Rebar

6. Services – Execution, Installation, Inspection, Testing

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

LIKE IN OTHER FIELDS OF LIFE, COMMON BAD PRACTICE

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

BUT PROFESSIONAL DECISIONS DO NOT ALLOW DOUBTS

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

FATAL ACCIDENT 1 : NICHOLL HIGHWAY TEMPORARY

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

FATAL ACCIDENT 2 : DOWNTOWN LINE BUGIS MRT STATION

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

FATAL ACCIDENT 3 : PIE VIADUCT COLLAPSE (2017)

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

TODAY WE WILL LEARN ABOUT DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS AND

Understand Chose the Design them Save time &

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

THE 4 PILLARS OF FASTENING

Codes Approvals Design Service

• Understanding of the • Min. requirement for • Design calculation in • Installed, supervised,

5. Design - Key Difference Between Anchor and Rebar

6. Services – Execution, Installation, Inspection, Testing

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

THE 4 PILLARS OF FASTENING

Codes Approvals Design Service

• Understanding of the • Min. requirement for • Design calculation in • Installed, supervised,

EUROPEAN REGULATORY FRAMEWORK FOR POST-

“Rebar theory” “Anchor theory”

Static Fire Seismic Static Fire Seismic

Product EAD 330499 TR 049

CSTB regional CSTB/DIBt

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

5. Design - Key Difference Between Anchor and Rebar

6. Services – Execution, Installation, Inspection, Testing

Post-installed Rebar | WSP, Dec 2019

THE 4 PILLARS OF FASTENING

Codes Approvals Design Service