Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Welding and Engineering' Held at the University of Cranfield, 18-19 June 2008.
Synopsis
In a previous study, equations for the prediction of the maximum HAZ hardness in
single pass welds in C-Mn and low alloy steel were reviewed. In the present study,
the benefits of an approach for estimating the hardness of the heat affected zone
may result in increases in hardness rather than decreases where the initial
microstructure does not contain high percentages of martensite and the steel
maximum HAZ hardness, and of the effect of changes in welding parameters, can
The parameters used to describe a heat treatment cycle (heating rate, soak
temperature, soak time and cooling rate) are often combined into a temper
parameter. However, as the heating and cooling rates are constantly changing,
temperature increases and finite hold times. This discretised thermal cycle was
hardness after PWHT, in which the composition of the material and the Hollomon-
Jaffe parameter were used. This method was adopted in the present study, with
study, the final hardness can be calculated. It should be noted that trends
hardness values are best predicted in this fashion, as the uncertainties associated
with any prediction are compounded with increased assumptions at each stage.
This approach was tested against welds deposited with varying heat inputs; for the
Introduction
Increasingly, fabrication codes and customers call for a limit on the maximum
hardness achieved in the weld region. In most cases, this applies to the weld metal
cap or root, or the heat affected zone (HAZ), and procedure development and
qualification welding trials are carried out to attain the required properties and
the as-welded HAZ hardness, but no empirical relationships have been determined
for multipass welds. Oddy et al[9] have determined a method and finite element
This method requires intimate knowledge of the thermal properties of the steel
(TTT diagram, phase diagram, absolute martensite and bainite hardness levels),
which are not necessarily readily available. Oddy's approach uses the Hollomon-
Jaffe parameter (HJP)[10] to describe the effect of the thermal cycle, as does an
approach taken by Okumura et al[11] for describing the maximum HAZ hardness
Overview
parameters and the distance from the weld pool change. This results in a complex
weld, the hardness along the HAZ, adjacent to the fusion boundary (grain-
coarsened HAZ, GCHAZ) can be described with knowledge of the parent steel
composition and the welding parameters (or cooling time from 800°C to 500°C
(t8/5) recorded during welding). The hardness in the HAZ reduces with increasing
distance from the fusion boundary, as the peak temperature experienced reduces.
'change in hardness' algorithm, which was selected for use in this work, to apply to
the subcritically reheated grain-coarsened HAZ (SCGCHAZ). This method uses the
Fig.1. Schematic showing zones present in the cap region of a multipass weld
Determination of the Hollomon-Jaffe Parameter
For a given set of welding conditions (thickness, joint geometry, heat input,
preheat), the thermal cycle can be estimated from the Rosenthal equations, at
temperature profile with respect to time, the effective HJP for the sub-critical
At t=t0, T=T0
At t=t1, T=T1
At t=tn, T=Tn
The stepwise evaluation of the HJP re-evaluates an effective time at the next
The HJP increases to a maximum value for a given position in the weld zone (Fig.3).
Fig.3. A diagram of how the HJP and temperature vary with time for a given
location in the weld zone during welding
The maximum HAZ hardness of the first weld bead was established by using the
t8/5 is the cooling time from 800°C to 500°C for a given weld pass, in s.
substituted for t8/5 in all cases to account for the maximum hardness possible (i.e.
100% martensite).
For cases where t8/5 ≥ tb, tb is substituted for t8/5 in the first part of the equation, to
account for a fully bainitic microstructure, with continual softening to allow for
manner shown in Fig.4. The 95% confidence interval for this prediction is ±56HV.
HV = HVweld - ΔHV
Where HVweld is the as-welded maximum hardness and ΔHV is the change in
M = 0.5 - 0.455arctan(x)
t8/5, tm and tb relate to the initial as-welded hardness values.
The tempering (softening) effect is influenced by the term M, and the relevant HJP
respectively.
Welding trials
were deposited. So that the desired extent of bead overlap could be achieved with
the minimum number of trial welds, the welds were bead in groove welds, with a
second weld bead deposited in a groove running at an angle to the first weld bead
(Fig.5). The parent steel compositions are given in Table 1 and the welding
parameters, parent material thickness and IIW carbon equivalent are given in
Table 2.
Fig.5. Schematic example of the two weld beads deposited, indicating divergent
welds in order to ensure that the overlap of the beads was optimised at a certain
location in the plate
Plate
C Si Mn P S Cr Mo Ni Al
Code
1A624 0.10 0.38 1.35 0.024 0.020 0.020 0.008 0.047 0.004
1B819 0.14 0.20 1.05 0.015 0.004 0.550 <0.004 0.230 0.039
1B458 0.07 0.28 1.36 0.007 0.002 0.014 0.003 0.015 0.037
1B168 0.19 0.23 1.44 0.015 0.006 0.022 0.013 0.023 0.025
The welds were sectioned at a location that gave appropriate overlap of the two
The samples were etched in 2% Nital, and a detailed hardness survey of all the
The equations given above were incorporated into a FORTRAN computer model to
predict the hardness of the regions of the HAZ, namely the GCHAZ; grain-refined
SCGCHAZ.
The computer model was used to predict the hardness of these zones for double-
pass bead in groove, submerged arc welds, with an offset of the secondary groove;
see Fig.5. This section revealed the various reheated zones of the weld (Fig.6). The
Vickers hardness in each of the zones of interest was measured using a 5kg load,
Fig.6. An example of the overlap of two weld beads, giving a subcritically reheated
grain coarsened heat affected zone in the location indicated by the arrow
The predicted and measured values of hardness are given in Table 3. The
graphically in Fig.7 for the SCGCHAZ. The agreement for subcritically reheated
regions is ±53HV, which is within the limitations established for earlier work on the
The experimental work indicated that the grain refined HAZ (GRHAZ) had a
sample had a lower hardness in the reheated region than in the as-welded
locations. However, the predictions also indicated that bulk softening was more
Weld
Actual Prediction Actual- Actual Predicted Actual-
Predicted Predicted
(HV5) (HV) (HV5) (HV)
Discussion
The calculation of the HJP from this discretised thermal cycle was used, in
conjunction with an equation put forward by Okumura et al[11] for the change in
The assumptions and uncertainties inherent in the prediction did not affect the
remained within the limits determined in previous work for single pass welds.[15]
This agreement suggests that the approach, evaluating HJP over a weld thermal
cycle, and using that in the relevant equations to determine as-welded maximum
The predictions were better for absolute values of maximum HAZ hardness than
for determining the change in hardness for a given situation. This is because the
use of the value of tm from the original equations compensates for any over or
However, the method is potentially useful for evaluating the effect of changes in
maximum HAZ hardness has not been achieved in a weld procedure qualification
test. Calculations such as those carried out here would indicate the likely hardness
From the steel compositions and weld thermal cycles examined in this work, the
maximum hardness of different regions of the HAZ has been calculated, and
compared with values measured in the HAZ of overlapped submerged arc bead in
groove welds, made at a range of heat inputs, in steels of varying thickness and
3. The data generated in this work for the GCHAZ hardness was in
agreement with the method put forward by earlier work.
Recommendations
The algorithms and approach used in this work have been incorporated into a
FORTRAN computer program, which can provide the welding engineer with a
the HAZ. For applications where the maximum HAZ hardness is important, this
the scatter-band for the original single pass hardness prediction is large (two
standard deviations = ±56HV) the trends predicted are of more value than the
Acknowledgements
due to W Martin, M Tiplady and L Smith. This work was funded by member
References
3. Suzuki H: 'A new formula for estimating HAZ hardness in welded steels'
Transactions of the Japan Welding Society 1985 16 (2) 61-68.
12. Rosenthal D: 'The theory of moving sources of heat and its application
to metal treatments'. Trans ASME 1946 68 (11) 849-866.
contactus@twi.co.uk
+44(0)1223 899000
contactus@twi.co.uk