1 Take print outs of next sheet - For print out

2 Send the copy to respective HOD to know what do they expect from the training
3 Conduct the training and collect results of post test & feed back in the same format or maintain the result of post te
4 Send the same format to concerned HOD to measure the effectiveness of the training
5 Collect the data of the training from all the employees and feed in to "compile data here" sheet in soft form
6 See the comments changing automatically and take action as per that
7 Sample filled sheet is just for guidance
8 This file needs to be copied separately for each training
9 Refer Comments in compile data here sheet
10 Fill only ROSE coloured part & marks based on the feed back in compile data here sheet - other parts gets filled up
aintain the result of post test in different file

" sheet in soft form

- other parts gets filled up automatically

 TRAINING FEED BACK AND EFFECTIVENESS
TRAINING TOPIC : DATE :

NAME OF PARTICIPANT : FACULTY :

Department & Designation : Internal / External:

I PERCENTAGE OF MARKS OBTAINED AFTER TRAINING BY POST EXAM

Maximum Marks Marks Scored % of Marks

II Training need identified by SELF Head HR SUPERIOR OTHERS

III DESCRIBE EXPECTATION FROM THE TRAINING/OBJECTIVE OF ATTENDING THE TRAINING

IV FEED BACK FROM THE TRAINEE

Note : Max is 10. Tick the appropriate one Excellent Good Fair Poor
10 7.5 5 2.5
1 How far the training topic is related to your area of work?
2 How much of your learning objective is fulfilled?
3 Whether trainer is able to clarify all your doubts?
4 Whether your time is utilized effectively during the training?
5 How much of trained subject can be implemented by you?
6 How far it improved your knowledge on the topic?
7 Whether you learnt anything new?
8 Whether course material, training aids are good?
9 Whether training is started at right time as per schedule
10 Overall how do you rate the training?
Total marks as per the feed back =
Any suggestions to improve the training? (Mention comments for Fair and Poor area's)

V ASSESSMENT FROM THE SUPERIOR / SELF ASSESSMENT

Comments from the superior or Trainee ( to be filled after sufficient time )
(describe the area of improvement and Implementation of the topic learnt in company or personnel life)

Mention appropriate marks based on the implementation 100 80 50 25

Trainee Sign: HOD Sign :

Date : Date :

Training Effectiveness = Average Marks obtained from I, IV, V

Conduct retraining or take appropriate action if training effectiveness is less than 50%
 TRAINING FEED BACK AND EFFECTIVENESS
TRAINING TOPIC : DATE :

NAME OF PARTICIPANT : FACULTY :

Department & Designation : Internal / External:

I PERCENTAGE OF MARKS OBTAINED AFTER TRAINING BY POST EXAM

Maximum Marks 20 Marks Scored 18 % of Marks 90

II Training need identified by SELF Head HR SUPERIOR OTHERS

III DESCRIBE EXPECTATION FROM THE TRAINING/OBJECTIVE OF ATTENDING THE TRAINING

IV FEED BACK FROM THE TRAINEE

Note : Max is 10. Tick the appropriate one Excellent Good Fair Poor
10 7.5 5 2.5
1 How far the training topic is related to your area of work? 10
2 How much of your learning objective is fulfilled? 7.5
3 Whether trainer is able to clarify all your doubts? 5
4 Whether your time is utilized effectively during the training? 10
5 How much of trained subject can be implemented by you? 10
6 How far it improved your knowledge on the topic? 10
7 Whether you learnt anything new? 7.5
8 Whether course material, training aids are good? 7.5
9 Whether training is started at right time as per schedule 5
10 Overall how do you rate the training? 5
Total marks as per the feed back = 77.5 40 22.5 15 0
Any suggestions to improve the training? (Mention comments for Fair and Poor area's)

V ASSESSMENT FROM THE SUPERIOR / SELF ASSESSMENT

Comments from the superior or Trainee ( to be filled after sufficient time )
(describe the area of improvement and Implementation of the topic learnt in company or personnel life)

Mention appropriate marks based on the implementation 100 80 50 25

100

Trainee Sign: HOD Sign :

Date : Date :

Training Effectiveness = Average Marks obtained from I, IV, V 89.17

Conduct retraining or take appropriate action if training effectiveness is less than 50%
Training Topic: fmea Training conducted on 21.04.05
Training Planned date 25.01.2005
Faculty : Bhagat Singh No of Participants: 21 Difference (Number)=
Number of participants planned = 23 Participation (%)=
Min % of marks required = 60 Max % of marks = 100

Sl Max Marks % of Feed back from questions 1 to 10 Total Assessment

Name Dept.
No Marks Obtained Marks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 by superior
1 Rawal Q.A. 15 14 93.33 10 2.5 2.5 10 0 10 7.5 0 0 0 42.5 100
2 Rahul 15 12 80 10 2.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 85 75
3 15 15 100 7.5 5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 75
4 15 15 100 10 10 10 10 10 7.5 10 10 10 10 87.5
5 15 12 80 10 7.5 10 10 10 2.5 10 10 10 10 80
6 15 12 80 10 7.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 87.5
7 15 12 80 5 7.5 10 10 10 10 2.5 10 10 10 75
8 15 12 80 5 7.5 10 2.5 10 7.5 10 10 10 10 72.5
9 15 12 80 5 7.5 10 10 10 10 2.5 10 10 10 75
10 15 12 80 10 7.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 80
11 15 13 86.67 5 7.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 75
12 15 13 86.67 5 7.5 2.5 10 5 10 10 10 10 10 70
13 15 13 86.67 5 7.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 75
14 15 13 86.67 5 7.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 75
15 15 13 86.67 10 7.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 80
16 15 13 86.67 10 7.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 80
17 15 13 86.67 10 7.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 80
18 15 14 93.33 5 7.5 2.5 10 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 67.5
19 15 13 86.67 10 7.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 87.5
20 15 13 86.67 2.5 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 75
21 15 13 86.67 10 2.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 82.5

Average 86.35 7.62 6.55 5.71 9.64 8.93 9.4 9.17 9.52 9.52 9.52

ANALYSIS

I BASED ON THE TEST

 1 Number of participants scored more than 85% in the test = 14 = Number of internal faculties Refer Column F
2 Number of participants= 21
3 Percentage of participants obtained more than 85% in the test= 66.7
4 Maximum % of Marks scored 100
5 Minimum Marks Scored= 80
6 Average Marks= 86.3
Most Of the participants Understood the Subject.

II BASED ON THE FEEDBACK

A) Based on Feedback - Question and answer wise analysis Refer Column G
Q.1 : How far the training topic is related to your area of work?
1 Number of participants telling that it is related to their area = 12
2 Number of participants telling that it is not related to their area = 9 Find out the names (Red color in column G)
and analyze
3 Average opinion (%) ###
TRINING NEED IDENTIFICATION IS EXCELLENT.

Q.2: How much of your learning objective is fulfilled?

1 Number of participants telling that their objctive of attendingtraining is fulfilled. 16 Refer Column H
2 Number of participants telling that their objctive of attending training is not fulfilled.5
3 Average openion (%) ###
PURPOSE OF ATTENDING THE TRAINING IS FULFILLED FOR SOME PARTICIPANTS ONLY. ANLYSE
FOR OTHER PARTICIPANTS,

Q.3: Whether trainer is able to clarify all your doubts? Refer Column I
1 Number of participants telling that trainer is able to clarify the doubts. 9
2 Number of participants telling that trainer is not able to clarify the doubts. 12
3 Average openion (%) 57.1
TRAINER KNOWLEDGE IS FAIR.

Q.4: Whether your time is utilized effectively during the training? Refer Column J
1 Number of participants telling that time is utilized effectively during the training= 20
2 Number of participants telling that time is not utilized effectively during the training=
1
3 Average openion (%) 96.4
TIME MANGEMENT BY THE TRAINER IS EXCELLENT. USE HIM FOR FURTHER TRAININGS.
Q.5: How much of trained subject can be implemented by you? Refer Column K
1 Number of participants telling that trained subject can be implemented by them= 18
2 Number of participants telling that trained subject cannot be implemented by them=
3
3 Average openion (%) 89.3
TRAINING GIVEN CAN BE IMPLEMENTED BY MANYPARTICIPANTS SO HELPS TO ACHIVE ORGANIZATION'S OBJECTIVE.

Q.6: How far it improved your knowledge on the topic Refer Column L
1 Number of participants telling that their knowledge is improved to greater extent= 20
2 Number of participants telling that their knowledge is not improved to greater extent=
1
3 Average openion (%) 94.0
KNOWLEDGE IMPROVED FOR MOST OF THE PARTICIPANTS. SO IT IS USEFUL.

Q.7: Whether you learnt anything new?

1 Number of participants telling that trained subject can be implemented by them= 19
2 Number of participants telling that trained subject cannot be implemented by them=
2
3 Average openion (%) 91.7
MOST OF THE PARTICIPANTS LEARNT MANY NEW THINGS.TRAINING WAS USEFUL TO THE PARTICIPANTS

Q.8: Whether course material, training aids are good?

1 Number of participants feeling training aids and course materials very good= 20
2 Number of participants feeling training aids and course materials needs improvement=
1
3 Average openion (%) ###
MOST OF THE PARTICIPANTS SAY TRAINIIG AIDS, COURSE MATERIALS ARE GOOD

Q.9: Whether training is started at right time as per schedule

1 Number of participants telling that Training started as per schedule= 20
2 Number of participants telling that Training is not started as per schedule= 1
3 Average openion (%) ###
MOST OF THE PARTICIPANTS SAY TRAINING STARTED AT RIGHT TIME.

Q.10:Overall how do you rate the training?

1 Number of participants telling that training is very effective 20
2 Number of participants telling that training is not effective 1
3 Average openion (%) ###
MOST OF THE PARTICIPANTS SAY TRAINING IS VERY EFECTIVE.
b) OVER ALL OPENION OF PARTICIPANTS ON TRAINING BASED IN FEED BACK

1 Number of participants telling is training Excellent= 10 = 47.6%

2 Number of participants telling training is Good= 9 = 42.9%
3 Number of Participants telling training is Fair= 1 = 4.8%
4 Number of Participants telling training is Poor= 1 = 4.8%
2
91.30

Training
Effectivenes ANALYSIS
s Understanding of Subject FEED BACK EFFECTIVENESS
78.61 Understood and Can Train Others POOR EFFECTIVE
80.00 Understood Cannot Train others EXCELLENT VERY EFFECTIVE
87.50 Understood and Can Train Others GOOD VERY EFFECTIVE
93.75 Understood and Can Train Others EXCELLENT VERY EFFECTIVE
80.00 Understood Cannot Train others EXCELLENT VERY EFFECTIVE
83.75 Understood Cannot Train others EXCELLENT VERY EFFECTIVE
77.50 Understood Cannot Train others GOOD EFFECTIVE
76.25 Understood Cannot Train others GOOD EFFECTIVE
77.50 Understood Cannot Train others GOOD EFFECTIVE
80.00 Understood Cannot Train others EXCELLENT VERY EFFECTIVE
80.83 Understood and Can Train Others GOOD VERY EFFECTIVE
78.33 Understood and Can Train Others GOOD EFFECTIVE
80.83 Understood and Can Train Others GOOD VERY EFFECTIVE
80.83 Understood and Can Train Others GOOD VERY EFFECTIVE
83.33 Understood and Can Train Others EXCELLENT VERY EFFECTIVE
83.33 Understood and Can Train Others EXCELLENT VERY EFFECTIVE
83.33 Understood and Can Train Others EXCELLENT VERY EFFECTIVE
80.42 Understood and Can Train Others FAIR VERY EFFECTIVE
87.08 Understood and Can Train Others EXCELLENT VERY EFFECTIVE
80.83 Understood and Can Train Others GOOD VERY EFFECTIVE
84.58 Understood and Can Train Others EXCELLENT VERY EFFECTIVE
Column F for cell Color
Indicates participants scored more than 85%
Indicates participants scored between 70% to 85%
Indicates participants scored between 60% to 70%
Indicates participants scored less than 60%, Guidance required or retrain them

Column G for cell Color

Indicates It is directly related to their work area (they have ticked 10)
Indicates It is related to their work area and knowledge can be utilized and implemented. (They have ticked 7.5)
Indicates It is not related to their work area. -check out why these participants feel so or Whether this topic does not suit to their work area and training is not identified pro

Column H for cell Color

Indicates their objective of attending is completely fulfilled (They ahev ticked 10)
Indicates their objective of attending is partially fulfilled (They have ticked 7.5)
Indicates their objective of attending is not fulfilled (They have ticked 5, 2.5) check out why these participants feel so. This information may help for next training.

Column I for cell Color

Indicates Trainer has excellent knowledge and able to clrify all the doubts (They ahev ticked 10)
Indicates Trainers knowledge fair (They have ticked 7.5)
Indicates Trainers knowledge is poor (They have ticked 5, 2.5) check out why these participants feel so. This information may help for next training.

Column J for cell Color

Indicates Trainer has utilized the time very effectively (they ahev ticked 10)
Indicates Trainers has utillized the time in a good way (They have ticked 7.5)
Indicates Trainers time utization needs improvement(They have ticked 5, 2.5) check out why these participants feel so. This information may help for next training.
Column K for cell Color
Indicates training is identified inline with organization objective (they ahev ticked 10)
Hepls indirectly to achieve organixation objective (They have ticked 7.5)
Indicates Trainering is not very much usefull to achieve organization objective t(They have ticked 5, 2.5) check out why these participants feel so. This information may he
N'S OBJECTIVE.

Column L for cell Color

Indicates training is identified inline with organization objective (they ahev ticked 10)
Hepls indirectly to achieve organixation objective (They have ticked 7.5)
Indicates Trainering is not very much usefull to achieve organization objective t(They have ticked 5, 2.5) check out why these participants feel so. This information may he
g is not identified properly (They have ticked 5, or 2.5)

ext training.

next training.
s information may help for next training.

s information may help for next training.