Case Title: Select some text within a Jurisdiction; Once acqui STATES MARINE CORPORATION paragraph and click here to and ROYAL LINE, INC., continues until case copy the selected text. Citation petitioners, vs. CEBU SEAMEN’S terminated.—Once the Cour included. ASSOCIATION, INC., respondent. Industrial Relations Citation: 7 SCRA 294 acquired jurisdiction over More... case, it continues to have t jurisdiction until the case Search Result terminated (Manila Hotel Em Association vs. Manila Ho 1. ). The first constitutes the Company, et al., 40 O.G., No general rule, while the second is p. 3027). the exception. This, if there are no supplements given to the Minimum Wage L employees, within the meaning Reductions from wag of section 19, but merely facilities, section 3(f) governs, in Furnishing of means either which case the furnishing of supplements or facilities means by the employer shall be There is no conflict betw valued at the amounts specified in the law. Same; Same; section 3(f) and section 19 of Purpose; The criterion in Minimum Wage Law (Repu determining whether privilege is a supplement or a facility.—In Act No. 602). The f determining wheth-er a benefit constitutes the general ru or privilege, is a supplement or a facility the criterion is not the while the second is kind of benefit or item but its exception. This, if there purpose. The benefit or privilege given to the employees which consti-tutes an extra remuneration above and over his basic or or-dinary earning or VOL. 7, FEBRUARY 28, 1963 States Marine Corporation v Cebu Seamen's Asso., Inc.