Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
a. Rafael Mandelman
b. Rebecca Prozan
c. Scott Wiener
d. Bill Hemenger
nd
451 Hayes Street, 2 Floor | San Francisco, CA 94102 | Phone: 415.621.3260 | Fax: 415.703.0889 | sfnpc.org
ii. There will be a 1 minute time limit for opening introductory remarks
and a 1 minute limit for your answer for each question. Begin with 1
minute introductory remarks.
IV. Introductory Remarks from each candidate as well as their favorite park
a. Rafael Mandelman
i. Thank you NPC, Libby, GPA.
ii. Live right next to Dolores Park and that really is the park that is near
and dear. There has been a lot of issues there and there are people
here who are embroiled in those issues. The District 8 parks and
dedication to them put many other districts to shame from Glen
Canyon to Buena Vista. It’s great to be here.
b. Scott Wiener
i. Tie between Dolores Park and Walter Haas. 2 amazing parks in our
district. Track record of getting things done. LGBT center, president
of his neighborhood association. Wants to keep into the basic
running of the city – dealing with Bart station parameter, etc. Not
looking at happy meals. We need to consider the Parks bonds and
ensuring that Glen Park is getting enough attention form Ingleside
police station.
c. Bill Hemenger
i. Lives in Diamond heights. Favorite park is Glen Canyon. 2 dogs and
in the canyon every day. Lived at 19th and church on Dolores park.
For the last 8 years, Glen Canyon. I got into the race 6-7 months ago.
I am a political outsider, non-attorney coming from the private sector.
I want to apply those things to City Hall.
d. Rebecca Prozan
i. Rescue Dog who doesn’t do well off leash.
ii. Walter Haas, she voted on it in the SFNPC Best of Parks Poll near
Corona Heights.
iii. She is proud to have voted on the Eureka center while on the Rec
and Park Commission. She has worked for Willie Brown where she
was focused on fixing pot holes, keeping the streets clean.
iv. Is a prosecutor, wants to keep beat cops in the loop. As Bevan
Dufty’s legislative aide, she’s proud to have his endorsement. SF is
fractionalized. Believes we need leaders to bring people together.
2
1. RPD did a re-org. They have eliminated 137 Rec Director
positions. This means that instead of Rec Directors at the
centers, there are people being invited to rent the centers,
fields, etc.
2. There is a need to increase revenue to keep things open.
3. Example: Upper Noe has had an increase in use --- this past
weekend there was a Litquake event at Upper Noe Rec
Center. 50 people were enjoying literary events in the
neighborhood. This is what they are supposed to be about
and we need to be sure we’re balancing that. As a
commissioner, I was responsible for keeping our rec centers
open. I’m keeping my ear to the ground and fighting like hell
to keep rec centers open.
ii. Bill Hemenger
1. Our city and parks are our centers of life. They are the gem
to the city and draw in tourism dollars and people visiting our
town and city. You go anywhere in the world and they have
amazing parks. We should too. We need every possible
option on the table to improve our park and recreation
experience.
2. While not married to the idea, having a small local vendor to
take over the kiosk in the park to give back by way of capital
improvements in the parks, trash clean up and increased
park and recreation services is a possible solution to our
deficit. These changes could lead to having the income to
keep our rec centers open longer hours.
iii. Scott Wiener
1. It’s important to know when the peaks hour are, when people
will use it and be sure that they are open those hours.
iv. Rafael Mandelman
1. --- Technical Difficulties made it impossible to gather
Rafael’s answer, for details, please contact Rafael’s
Campaign. Contact for this campaign is at the end of these
notes. ---
3
1. Has heard the rumors of a bike path through Glen Canyon.
2. As the candidate of choice for the Sierra Club and League of
Conservation Voters, he would not support the bike lane or
any deforestation.
iv. Scott Wiener
1. Is also against removing forest.
2. At this juncture, the bike path would be too much work on a
limited budget. To do this project piecemeal would not be
workable with the community.
3. There needs to be a holistic approach when looking at large
projects with far reaching impacts.
4
could be an answer, but only if the neighbors are involved.
d. What are you going to do to reverse the funding to Rec and Park
back to “general fund”?
i. Rebecca Prozan
1. There are already Community Benefits Districts (CBDs) for
the business corridors in neighborhoods that include an
assessment. Why not have a second CBD for the park with
the same system? This cannot promise that there will be
shift the Rec and Park budget because the question we’re
trying to answer is how do we stretch the money left after the
cuts to cover all of the needs.
ii. Bill Hemenger
1. Would never propose a special assessment (like a Parks
CBD).
2. You cannot promise that there will be general fund dollars for
the department and it’s a growing issue. There needs to be a
coalition on the board working to find a way to fill these gaps.
iii. Scott Wiener
1. Boils down to reforming and vulcanizing the budget process.
2. There should be no set asides or individual revenue
streams. Set asides should be more difficult to get and a
supermajority should be used to make adjustments to these
set-asides and any budget issues.
iv. Rafael Mandelman
1. There is merit to the assessment that Rebecca suggests.
2. The challenge is the decentralization and equity issues
around the idea. The more affluent areas would get better
parks because they can afford an assessment.
3. A possible solution is a City-wide assessment to pay for
Golden Gate Park, which would free up money for our
neighborhood parks.
5
Dolores Park Works, etc. They are the key in raising the
much-needed funds to improve our parks. We need to be
strategic in creating partnerships to raise funds for Rec and
Park.
iii. Bill Hemenger
1. No on all of the taxes.
2. Someone needs to zero in on the inefficiencies , reorganize
the budget and weed out any issues of overspending. There
is no need to raise taxes, because they are just the easy
way out. We should deal with waste first.
iv. Rebecca Prozan
1. Agrees with Bill – there are inefficiencies. Why is there a
dedicated Golf Fund? As a commissioner, she wanted to
remove the golf set aside.
2. It is not appropriate for one interest to lock down an amount
of money when the Rec Centers close. She has already
raised this issue with Phil Ginsberg, General Manager
3. No tax is called for. This is a way to raise ideas creatively to
solve this problem.
6
2. 100s of Thousands of dollars are going into a park that is
NOT within the city limits. This should not be San
Francisco’s job or park to maintain.
g. It’s great that several of the candidates have dogs, but what about
kids and parks? What are your priorities for District 8 playground
renovations and updates? How will you keep kids safe from dogs
and able to enjoy greens space?
i. Scott Wiener
1. There are a lot of users in our parks and not all people
always understand that they are for all use. There is an
opportunity to be creative. There should be space for dogs,
youth, etc.
2. Example: Duboce Park. It’s a safe place for kids and dogs to
not run each other over due to creative use of fencing and
space allocation.
ii. Bill Hemenger
1. Is a dog owner, but conscious that there are more than just
dog uses in the parks.
2. Kids need a place to play and that playgrounds should be
redone to cover all ages. Right now most are for toddlers, up
to age 4 or 5. There is no place for 8-16 year olds to play.
We go to extremes.
iii. Rebecca Prozan
1. Upper Noe is an example of a location where once the dog
park went in, the park no longer allowed teens to play there.
The reason cited was trhat the play area was too small for
tenns to use.
2. This is the same situation with Eureka. There needs to be
space that is open for kids. Duboce is an excellent example
of it done well.
3. Dolores Park doesn’t want fencing.
4. The key is to listen, go through the process, and know when
to drive for a solution.
iv. Rafael Mandelman
1. Was going door to door and spoke with a gentleman who
said “I drive. I don’t bike. I have 3 kids and no dog. The city
doesn’t care about me.”
2. Bevan has been a great convener and has had a lot of
success.
3. The goal is for people to show each other manners. The
government cannot govern good manners, but at our parks,
you as an individual should.
7
concerned about the proposal to pave over 6 acres of western
Golden Gate Park with artificial turf and install 60 foot sports lights.
An environmental impact Report (EIR) is planned that will discuss
alternatives, including renovating the fields with natural grass. Will
you follow this process and consider the alternatives carefully?
i. Scott Wiener
1. Will follow the process and consider alternatives.
2. Some situations, like maintenance and the need for more
soccer fields could impact the decision made, but all
solutions will be considered after the CEQA and EIR have
been completed.
ii. Rafael Mandelman
1. With 10 years in land-use law, he is familiar with EIR reviews
and reads them with particular interest.
2. Gut reaction: Flood lights are not appropriate in Golden Gate
Park. The turf might be useful, as a lot of people may treat it
with care, it is a resource for the city.
iii. Rebecca Prozan
1. Rec and Park spent thousands of dollars to renovate the
soccer fields at Dolores Park and it did not go well.
2. Artifical turf is easier to maintain and cheaper.
3. Cannot comment for or against, but has a natural preference
for natural grass.
iv. Bill Hemenger
1. District elections may be by district, but they affect the whole
city. It is important to know all the races and who is running.
Think big!
2. Runs every Saturday with the Frontrunners in Golden Gate
Park. He has seen the area and is concerned. He’d like to
learn more about the issue.
8
1. Also a runner, he runs cross country through Golden Gate
Park, Lands End, Golden Gate Bridge and Twin Peaks. The
vistas inspire him by their beauty.
2. While running is his passion, his job is to provide a forum to
speak to the wants of the people. If there is a soccer field
needed and kids who want to play, he will work to ensure
there is a soccer field in an accessible area.
iv. Scott Wiener
1. Swimmer with no pool, as most of SF homes and
apartments do not have pools. He has often travelled over
30 minutes to find a space where a pool exists.
2. Does yoga and loved when Rec Centers use their space for
yoga.
3. Further, he wants to ensure there’s enough space in our
park system to just sit and hang out with friends. Passive
enjoyment and socializing is one of the must-haves in our
parks.
9
iv. Rafael Mandelman
1. Both Dolores Park and Noe Valley parklet raise interesting
points. The Board of Appeals has gone above and beyond
the best it can do, but the important thing is for your
neighbors to know what you’re doing.
2. RPD concessions should have been shared sooner, or in
more accessible communications methods. If the community
is engaged in the idea, it can lead to the finer points of
agreement.
10
iv. Bill Hemenger: Yes.
m. Are you in favor of shutting down the gun club at Lake Merced and
exploring the possibility of establishing a wildlife rescue center
there?
i. Rafael Mandelman: I would need to know more.
ii. Bill Hemenger: Same
iii. Scott Wiener: Same
iv. Rebecca Prozan: Yes. Get the guns out of our parks and off of our
streets.
11
1. His campaign forces him to tweet. People use twitter and
facebook. If it works as a means of fundraising, I’m for it.
Statistic: Phil Ginsburg established 200 too few gardeners.
In Golden Gate Park, 90 gardeners were hired and now only
30 remain. Private fundraising may not close the gap.
q. Who would be your first choice for interim mayor if one is needed?
i. Rafael Mandelman
1. Someone else said Reskin. Who is planning on running and
who can public stand. There are benefits to a short-term
mayor. Mike Hennessey is one suggestion. Thus, no stress.
ii. Scott Wiener
1. You deserve to know. It may be the 1st and most important
decision by the new board.
2. Suggestions: Ed Harrington and Mike Hennessey
3. Other people: Dennis Herrera, Leno, Dufty.
iii. Bill Hemenger
1. Sean Elsbernd
2. Bevan Dufty
iv. Rebecca Prozan
1. From my contacts, it seems that the old board, not the new
board, will make this decision.
12
you deliver crappy news. Crime is prosecuted. Victims must
participate.
iii. Rafael Mandelman
1. Was horrified as well. SF spends a huge amount of money
on our justice system. Supervisors must hold the police force
accountable and, often release is a terrible solution to the
problem of not having the staff or money to keep dangerous
people in the justice system.
2. One thing voters can do is to vote for Kamala Harris as
Attorney General of CA.
iv. Scott Wiener
1. Violent attacks in district 8, Castro, Diamond Heights, etc.
Hall of justice not functioning as it should. We as a city have
to do a better job at holding people accountable for their
behavior. Hall of Justice needs to run better. Public safety.
He is a founding member of Castro Community on Patrol.
Proud to have support of police and fire department.
13
the mayor on the phone to make sure that development is
happening.
ii. Rafael Mandelman
1. Reasonably better. Neighborhood people don’t trust
Planning department to follow their own rules (i.e.
Neighborhood Character). Arbitrarily opposed or applied.
Developers have similar concerns. The larger city-wide
projects (i.e. the Rincon tower) get approved. Smaller
developers don’t understand why their project takes forever
to get approved while these massive projects receive
approval so quickly.
iii. Scott Wiener
1. Process is broken. This is seen in the delays, expense and
damage to communities that occur. Look at upper Market,
Castro, Valencia. Lengthy development approval. Small
projects want to stay but they can’t. The process is broken.
iv. Bill Hemenger
1. Most dysfunctional procedures in city.
2. Slows economy and growth. Discourage fees. pro/con of
economy.
14
general fund revenue. I think congestion pricing is worth
looking into.
w. How would you navigate and influence decisions made by the entire
board and the rest of city government to realize these?
i. Bill Hemenger
1. I have the least amount government experience up here.
However, being in the private sector for 25 years, you don’t
get much done without having to earn a profit, to minimize
the margin. You have to work with a lot of different
organizations. I have been working for Oracle for the past 6
years and have processed 21 integrations and acquisitions.
It’s a matter of diplomatically negotiating your position and to
earn the respect of the rest of the supervisors and to realize
the benefits and value of what we’re working towards.
ii. Rebecca Prozan
1. Bevan gets least credit for this.
2. We have to look at fixing SF as a whole. The district needs
someone who can work with all sides on the board.
iii. Rafael Mandelman
1. I’ve been endorsed by a majority of the Board of
Supervisors. So to walk through the door and be able to
work with colleagues and have a high level of respect—I am
the candidate that can offer that. I want you to understand
that I don’t represent anyone else. I represent the voters of
District 8. So my job is to reflect your values, your concerns.
The people of D8 see the BOS and are troubled or amused
or both. My relationships will allow to play a leadership roll
on BOS. Carmen Chu has endorsed Scott Wiener. I called
her up and say hey I don’t really want to have a minority on
the board feeling isolated. I want to work with her.
15
iv. Scott Wiener
1. I think if you look at the BOS, you can have a good working
relationship with your colleagues without always agreeing. If
you look at my track record, I have worked with people I
don’t always agree with. I worked as a chairman of
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC).
That is a rambunctious group of people. Rafael and I—we
have a lot of disagreements but worked very closely together
on voter registration and brought positive results. Then when
Aaron Peskin came in and took over as chair, he called
regularly for the first six months and questioned me about
insurance or about voter registration programs. Some people
told me don’t return his calls but I did. I wanted the
Democratic party to succeed. That’s why you have to be
professional and set aside differences.
16
2. Our tax structure in the city. The way we are getting money
now is really screwed up. We rely heavily on the payroll tax
which is a tax on jobs. We require a lot of fees from the small
businesses. I think shifting our emphasis on a gross receipt
tax and reducing the payroll tax would make a lot of sense.
3. The danger of the case-by-case approach to the larger
retailers is the gradual slide towards the national chain. What
we really need to do is protect the character of our
neighborhood. Each new chain that comes in, we need to
make it harder for them.
iv. Scott Wiener
1. I agree that the payroll tax needs to be reformed. It is a job
killer now. I know small business owners who cut the hours
of their staff because they don’t want to hit the $250k
threshold to trigger the payroll tax. If they go beyond the
$250k threshold, they can get retroactively taxed from dollar
#1. Terrible, terrible system and we need to reform it.
2. I support the small business assistance center. They provide
case matters to people who are starting small businesses or
people who are trying to grow their small businesses and
help them to navigate through this process. In terms of chain
stores, I think it is a case by case matter. Not to say no big
chain stores or all big chain stores. Rigid thinking is bad for
community. I support Trader Joe’s but Walgreens shouldn’t
be allowed in when there are already 5 storefronts nearby.
17
midyear. We’re never going to resolve the budget problem
until state dramatically reforms the tax is CA. In San
Francisco, I don’t automatically support every tax or oppose
every tax. On the ballot this year, I’m not supporting the hotel
tax, but I do support the property transfer tax for $5-10M and
up property and I think that is fair.
iii. Bill Hemenger
1. Taxes. Easy way to do it, right? We need to look at where
we’re wasting first. We’ve got to look at the budget and
we’ve got to look at our wastes. Even though we have some
26,000 employees making $100,000 or more, I am the only
one up here supporting Prop B. I think that’s a step in the
right direction. We’ve got to get the pension situation under
control and I also think that the payroll tax does need
reorganization. Either get rid of it or in 5 years, 10 years to
stimulate job growth. There are a lot of different ways to
generate revenue. We’ve got to make it easier for
businesses to start up here in San Francisco and employ our
people.
iv. Rebecca Prozan
1. When we faced our record high deficit last year-- $487M, we
adapted by working with our city employees and labor to
renegotiate contracts.
2. But next year the real work is going to have to begin. What
we have now is you’ve got city employees who hear rumors
about budget cuts. All over the map, city work is not getting
done because people are worried about their budget.
18
can talk. Anyone can read up on things and talk about it. Think about
what we’ve actually done. I have a proven track record. I am the only
person on this stage who has built a community center. I am the only
person on this stage to be president of a neighborhood association.
The only person to have co-founded a safety organization. I don’t say
that to brag. I know how to get things done at City Hall. I’ve worked
with almost every department. I’m proud of the endorsements I have
because they reflect that work. I’m proud that Senator Mark Leno is
supporting me. Nancy Pelosi, Carmen Chu, the healthcare workers,
the police department, the fire department. I’m proud of that support
and I will work day and night for you.
d. Rafael Mandelman
i. You should all pay very close attention to special interest. You pay
attention to all the things in your mailbox. CPMC, realtors, developers
are paying close attention. They don’t want me. I’ve had a little more
trouble than some of my opponents, partly because of the decisions
I’ve made during the past years especially regarding healthcare.
Nurses, green party, etc. Republicans don’t want me. I hope you all
will vote for me because I will stand up for you.
19
iii. (415)401-8440
d. Rafael Mandelman
i. http://www.rafael2010.com/
ii. Rafael4supe@gmail.com
iii. (415)503-1443
iv. 2231 Market Street, SF 94114
20