Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Technical Report I
Richard Garrison
Georgia Southern University
Statesboro, Georgia, USA
mc c p T c + mh c p T h
T eq=
mc c p + mh c p
(4)
DATA
After conducting the experiment, several data points were
obtained. It should be reiterated that three trials were conducted
under the three different configurations as noted in Table 1.
Figure 1. Scale and Thermocouple Equipment Therefore, the data points collected can be arranged into three
separate tables (including the experimental equilibrium
Next, room temperature water is to be added to another temperature) in order to produce reliable results later. The
beaker, weighed, and be heated up to a known temperature tables include the following.
value using a hot plate shown below. For the requirements of
this experiment it shall be 60°C Table 2. 75g Liquid H2O at 60oC Combined With 75g Liquid
H2O at 20oC
o
Trial mc(g) Tc( C) mh(g) Th(oC) Teg(oC)
1 75 14 75.7 60 33
2 75.4 14 75.8 61 35
Equation 5 introduced in the Introduction section. An example A table of the resulting percent error is displayed below. It
of such a calculation is rendered below by using the data values should be noted that once again the variables of the experiment
from Trial 1 of Table 2. were reduced to Configuration numbers.
mc T c +mh T h ( 75 g ) ( 14 ° C ) +(75.7 g)(60 ° C)
T eq= = =37.11 ° C Table 6. Compiled Percent Error Results in %
mc +mh (75 g+75.7 g) Trial Configuration Configuration Configuration
1 2 3
By conduction Equation 5 on all three trials on each of the 1 11.07 7.83 9.64
three separate configurations the following tables of the 2 6.81 8.75 9.87
theoretical equilibrium temperatures can be compiled as 3 8.15 7.81 7.07
displayed below. It should be noted that in order to avoid the
repetition of the previous data points in previous section and While the previous table indicates that the experimental
the production of multiple graphs, the different experimental results for equilibrium temperature is not exactly the same as
values were reduced to “Configuration” numbers in the the theoretical equilibrium temperature, this does not make the
following table. First Law of Thermodynamics invalid. It can be understood that
there are several reasons for the difference in percent error in
Table 5. Compiled Experimental Equilibrium Temperatures in this experiment.
°C Perhaps the most fundamental error in this experiment is
Trial Configuration Configuration Configuration that the First Law primarily states in this configuration that
1 2 3 system being studied must be completed isolated to its outside
1 37.11 43.40 50.91 environment. The system in quest was a Styrofoam cup which
2 37.56 42.74 48.82 serves as a good insulator, but not a perfect one. Measurable
3 37.02 43.39 49.5 amount of heat was able to escape the systems due to
convection of the surrounding air around it. This results in the
DISCUSSION equilibrium temperature not being completely accurate as there
Considering the results of the experiments, several was in fact an ambient temperature of the surround air that was
conclusions can be made about the nature and the application of not taken into consideration.
the First Law of Thermodynamics. The principle explored is Another source of error is one that is a result of human error
that since when system is isolated (through the use of using as well. While it was stated in the Experimental Methods
insolation as means of reducing the effect of ambient section of this report what the intended conditions and values of
temperature to a non-factor), the energy and work undergone by the variables were supposed to be, human error ensures that the
a system is equal to that of the initial conditions that originally exact mass of the water for each trial was not exact. The
described the system. When conducting the experiment, the temperature of the heated water also played a considerable role