Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
on
The 2019 Proposed Amendments to the
REVISED RULES ON EVIDENCE
A.M. No. 19-08-05-SC
8 October 2019
(Effective: 1 MAY 2020)
Deputy Court Administrator RAUL B. VILLANUEVA
OCA-Supreme Court
NOTICE: This material was done for educational purposes only. The comparisons made herein were simply to determine
what were the amendments or revisions done in every Rule, if any. The reasons for the amendments or revisions, for lack of
sufficient information thereon, are not discussed. Full responsibility is assumed for any comment or remark found herein.
RULE 128
GENERAL PROVISIONS
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
Sec. 3. Admissibility of Evidence is admissible Evidence is admissible q The amendment in
evidence when it is relevant to when it is relevant to Sec. 3 is that
the issue and not the issue and not evidence may be
excluded by the law or excluded by the inadmissible if
these rules. Constitution, the law excluded also by
or these Rules. the Constitution
q In the Constitution,
there are basic
rights that may
affect the
admissibility of
evidence, such as
those covered by
the Bill of Rights.
NOTE: No amendment in Sec. 1 (Evidence defined), Sec. 2 (Scope) and Sec. 4 (Relevancy; collateral matters)
RULE 129
WHAT NEED NOT BE PROVED
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
Sec. 1. Judicial notice, A court shall take judicial notice, A court shall take judicial notice, q The amendment in Sec. 1
without the introduction of without the introduction of pertains to recognizing the
when mandatory evidence, of the existence and evidence, of the existence and official acts of the legislative,
territorial extent of states, their territorial extent of states, their executive and judicial
p o l i t i c a l h i s t o r y, f o r m s o f p o l i t i c a l h i s t o r y, f o r m s o f departments of the National
government and symbols of government and symbols of Government of the Philippines
nationality, the law of nations, the nationality, the law of nations, the
admiralty and maritime courts of admiralty and maritime courts of
the world and their seals, the the world and their seals, the
political constitution and history of political constitution and history of
the Philippines, official acts of the the Philippines, official acts of the
legislative, executive and judicial legislative, executive and judicial
departments of the Philippines, the departments of the National
laws of nature, the measure of Government of the Philippines,
time, and the geographical the laws of nature, the measure of
divisions. time, and the geographical
divisions.
Sec. 3. Judicial notice, During the trial, the court, on During the pre-trial and the q The amendment in Sec. 3
its own initiative, or on trial, the court, motu recognizes, among others, the
when hearing judicial notice may be
necessary request of a party, may proprio, or upon motion,
announced also during the
announce the intention to shall hear the parties on the pre-trial.
take judicial notice of any propriety of taking judicial q Also, the court may motu
matter and allow the parties notice of any matter. proprio or upon motion”,
to be heard thereon. instead of “on request”, hear
the parties on giving a matter
judicial notice
1. Original Document When the subject of inquiry is When the subject of inquiry is q The amendment in Sec. 3
the contents of a document, the contents of a document, includes as a subject of
Rule (No longer the Best inquiry, not only a document,
no evidence shall be writing, recording,
Evidence Rule) but also a writing, recording,
admissible other than the photograph or other record,
Sec. 3. Original original document itself, no evidence is admissible photograph or other record
document must be q The rule is that “no evidence
except in the following cases: other than the original is admissible other than
produced; exceptions document itself, except in the original document itself”
following cases: q Now, the exception applies if,
aside from the document
itself, the “writing, recording,
photograph or other record”,
cannot be presented
1. Original Document (a) The original of the document (a) An “original” of a document q This item (a) is a new
is one of the contents of which is the document itself or any provision
Rule are the subject of inquiry counterpart intended to have q The amendment defines what
Sec. 4. Original of the same effect by a person an original document is, which
document executing or issuing it. An is the document itself or any
“original” of a photograph counterpart intended to have
includes the negative or any the same effect
print therefrom. If data is q Also, it provides that an
stored in a computer or similar original of a photograph
device, any printout or other includes the negative or any
output readable by sight or print therefrom
other means, shown to reflect q Further, the data stored in a
the data accurately, is an computer or similar device,
“original”. when printed, is also an
original
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
(c) When an entry is repeated (c) A duplicate is admissible q This item (c) is a new
in the regular course of to the same extent as an provision
business, one being copied original unless (1) a genuine q The admissibility of a
from another at or near the question is raised as to the duplicate is allowed to the
time of the transaction, all the authenticity of the original, same extent as an original,
entries are likewise equally or (2) in the circumstances, except if (1) a genuine
regarded as originals it is unjust or inequitable to question is raised as to the
admit the duplicate in lieu of authenticity of the original
the original. or (2) it is unjust or
inequitable to admit the
duplicate”
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
2. Secondary Evidence NO ORIGINAL PROVISION When the contents of q Sec. 7 is a new provision
documents, records, q It pertains to “voluminous”
Sec. 7. Summaries photographs, or numerous evidence that cannot be
accounts are voluminous and examined in court without
cannot be examined in court great loss of time, so the
without great loss of time, and contents thereof may be
the fact sought to be presented in the form of a
established is only the general chart, summary or calculation
result of the whole, the
contents of such evidence may
be presented in the form of a
chart, summary or calculation.
q A l s o , t h e “ v o l u m i n o u s ”
The originals shall be available evidence must be available to
for examination or copying, or the adverse party for
both, by the adverse party at a examination or copying
reasonable time and place.
3. Parol Evidence Rule When the terms of an When the terms of an q The amendment in the first
agreement have been agreement have been paragraph of Sec. 10 is not
Sec. 10. Evidence of substantial, aside from the re-
reduced to writing, it is reduced to writing, it is
written agreements considered as containing all considered as containing all numbering thereof, the word
the terms agreed upon and the terms agreed upon and “as” was merely inserted
there can be, between the there can be, as between the
parties and their successors in parties and their successors in
interest, no evidence of such interest, no evidence of such
terms other than the contents terms other than the contents
of the written agreement. of the written agreement.
NOTE1: The amendments in Secondary Evidence, Sec. 5 (When original document is unavailable) and Sec. 6 (When original
document is in adverse party’s custody or control) are gender-based (either “his or her” or “he or she”)
NOTE3: No amendment in Secondary Evidence, Sec. 8 (Evidence admissible when original document is a public record) and Sec. 9
(Party who calls for document not bound to offer it), except the re-numbering of said sections due to the addition of a new Sec. 7
(Summaries)
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
3. Parol Evidence Rule However, a party may present However, a party may present q No substantial amendment in
evidence to modify, explain or evidence to modify, explain or the third paragraph of Sec. 10,
Sec. 10. Evidence of add to the terms of the written add to the terms of the written aside from the gender-based
written agreements – agreement if he puts in issue in agreement if he or she puts in amendment, inserted was
cont. his pleading: issue in a verified pleading: word “verified” when referring
(a) xxx (a) xxx to the required pleading to
(b) xxx (b) xxx “modify explain or add to the
(c) xxx (c) xxx terms of a written agreement”
(d) xxx (d) xxx
C. TESTIMONIAL During their marriage, neither the During their marriage, the q The amendment in Sec. 23 is
husband nor the wife may testify husband or the wife cannot that it made clear that the
EVIDENCE for or against the other without testify for or against the other husband or the wife “cannot”
1. Qualification of the consent of the affected without the consent of the testify against each other,
Witnesses spouse, except in a civil case by affected spouse, except in a civil subject to exceptions involving
one against the other, or in a case by one against the other, or a civil case filed by one
Sec. 23. Disqualification
criminal case for a crime in a criminal case for a crime spouse against the other or in
by reason of marriage committed by one against the committed by one against the a criminal case committed by
other or the latter ’s direct other or the latter ’s direct one spouse against the other
descendants or ascendants. descendants or ascendants. or the latter ’s direct
descendants or ascendants
NOTE1: No amendment in 4. Interpretation of Documents, Sec. 11 (Interpretation of a writing according to its legal meaning), Sec. 12 (Instrument construed so as to
give effect to all provisions), Sec. 13. (Interpretation according to intention; general and particular provisions), Sec. 15 (Peculiar signification of terms), Sec. 16 (Written
words control printed), Sec. 17 (Experts and interpreters to be used in explaining certain writings), Sec. 19 (Construction in favor of natural right) and Sec. 20
(Interpretation according to usage), except the re-numbering of the said sections
NOTE2: Amendments in 4. Interpretation of Documents, Sec. 14 (Interpretation according to circumstances) and Sec. 18 (Of two constructions, which preferred) are
gender-based and the re-numbering of the said sections
NOTE3: No amendment in C. TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE, 1. Qualification of Witnesses, Sec. 21 (Witnesses; their qualifications), except the re-numbering of said
section
NOTE4: Amendments in 1. Qualification of Witnesses, Sec. 22 (Testimony confined to personal knowledge) are gender-based and the re-numbering of said section.
This is the old Sec. 36 (Testimony generally confined to personal knowledge; hearsay excluded)
NOTE5: The old 1. Qualification of Witnesses, Sec. 21 (Disqualification by reason of mental incapacity or immaturity) was DELETED
NOTE6: The old 1. Qualification of Witnesses, Sec. 23 (Disqualification by reason of death or insanity) was TRANSPOSED to the new Sec. 39.
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
(c) A person authorized to practice (c) A physician, psychotherapist or q Item (c) is completely a different
medicine, surgery or obstetrics person reasonably believed by the provision on “doctor-patient”
cannot in a civil case, without the patient to be authorized to privilege.
consent of the patient, be examined practice medicine or q This identifies who are covered
as to any advice or treatment given psychotherapy cannot in a civil by the privilege, or those who
by him or any information which he case, without the consent of the cannot be examined as to any
may have acquired in attending such patient, be examined as to any confidential communication made
patient in a professional capacity, confidential communication made for the purpose or treatment of
which information was necessary to for the purpose of diagnosis or the patient’s physical, mental or
enable him to act in such capacity, treatment of the patient’s physical, emotional condition, including
and which which would blacken the mental or emotional condition, alcohol or drug addition,
reputation of the patient; including alcohol or drug addition, particularly the physician,
between patient and his or her psychotherapist or person
physician or psychotherapist. This believed to be authorized to
privilege also applies to persons, practice medicine
including members of the patient’s q The privilege now covers
family, who have participated in “members of the patient’s family
the diagnosis or treatment of the who participated in the diagnosis
patient under the direction of the or treatment of the patient under
physician or psychotherapist. the direction of the physician or
psychotherapist
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
1. Qualification of NO ORIGINAL PROVISION A “psychotherapist” is: q This definition of a
“psychotherapist” is a new
Witnesses (a) A person licensed to provision in item (c)
Sec. 24. Disqualification practice medicine engaged in
by reason of privileged the diagnosis or treatment of a
mental or emotional condition,
communication – cont.
or
(b) A person licensed as a
psychologist by the
government while similarly
engaged.
(d) A minister or priest cannot, (d) A minister, priest or person q Item (d) identifies who are
without the consent of the reasonably believed to be so covered by the “priest-
person making the confession, cannot, without the consent of confessant” privileged
the affected person, be communication, which
be examined as to any
examined as to any includes a person reasonably
confession made to or any communication or confession believed to be a minister or
advice given by him in his made to or any advice given by priest by the confessant or
professional character in the him or her, in his or her affected person, regarding the
course of discipline enjoined professional character, in the confession or advice given to
by the church to which the course of discipline enjoined by him
minister or priest belongs; the church to which the minster
or priest belongs.
(e) A public officer cannot be q The amendment in item (e)
(e) A public officer cannot be
examined during or after his or covers not only
examined during his term of her tenure as to communications communications during the
o ff i c e a f t e r w a r d s , a s t o made to him or her in official tenure of the public officer, but
communications made to him confidence, when the court finds even “after his or her tenure”
in official confidence, when that the public interest would
the court finds that the public suffer by the disclosure.
interest would suffer by the
disclosure.
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
1. Qualification of N O O R I G I N A L The communication shall be q This last paragraph is a new
Witnesses PROVISION privileged, even in the hands provision
of a third person who may q For the communication to
Sec. 24. Disqualification have obtained the remain privileged, even if in
by reason of privileged information, provided that the hands of a third person,
communication – cont. the original parties to the the concerned parties
communication took should have taken
precaution to protect its precautions to protect its
confidentiality. confidentiality
2. Testimonial Privilege No person may be No person shall be compelled q The amendment in Sec. 25 is,
compelled to testify to testify against his or her among others, gender-based.
Sec. 25. Parental and q Also, there is a new provision
against his parents, other parents, other direct
filial privilege ascendants, children or other on the exception to the parental
direct ascendants, children and filial privilege, i.e., when
direct descendants, except
or other direct the testimony is indispensable
when such testimony is in a crime involving the
descendants. indispensable in a crime concerned person or by one
against that person or by parent against the other
one parent against the other.
NOTE1: The amendments in 3. Admissions and Confessions, Sec. 27 (Admission of a party), Sec. 33 (Admission by silence) and Sec. 34
(Confession) are gender-based and pertains to the re-numbering of the said sections
NOTE2: No amendment in 3. Admissions and Confessions, Sec. 29 (Admission by third party), except the re-numbering of said section
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
3. Admissions and The act or declaration of a The act or declaration of a q The amendment in Sec. 31 is
conspirator relating to the conspirator in furtherance of the a minor one and a matter of
Confessions conspiracy and during its conspiracy and during its style, aside from the re-
Sec. 31. Admission by existence, may by given in existence, may by given in numbering of the said
conspirator evidence against the co- evidence against the co- section
conspirator after the conspiracy conspirator after the conspiracy is
is shown by evidence other than shown by evidence other than
such act of declaration. such act of declaration.
3. Admissions and Where one derives title to Where one derives title to property q The amendment in Sec. 32 is
property from another, the act, from another, the latter’s act, a minor one and a matter of
Confessions declaration, or omission of the declaration, or omission, in relation style, as well as pertaining to
Sec. 32. Admission by latter, while holding the title, in to the property, is evidence against the numbering of the said
privies relation to the property, is the former if done while the latter section
evidence against the former. was holding the title. q Also, it clarifies that the act,
declaration or omission of
the holder of title is evidence
against the one deriving title
therefrom
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
5. Hearsay NO ORIGINAL PROVISION Hearsay is a statement other than q This a new provision in Sec.
one made by the declarant while 37 which defines what
Sec. 37. Hearsay testifying at a trial or hearing, HEARSAY means, which
offered to prove the truth of the essentially is a statement
facts asserted therein. A statement other than one made by the
is (1) an oral or written assertion or declarant while testifying at
(2) a non-verbal conduct of a a trial or hearing. The
person, if it is intended by him or statement may be (i) oral or
her as an assertion. Hearsay written or (ii) a non-verbal
evidence is inadmissible except as conduct of a person.
otherwise provided in these Rules. q Prior thereto, there was no
definition of hearsay in the
A statement is not hearsay if the Rules of Court.
declarant testifies at the trial or
hearing and is subject to cross-
examination concerning the q This second paragraph of
statement, and the statement is (a) Sec. 37 is also a new
inconsistent with the declarant’s provision. It defines what is
testimony, and was given under NOT A HEARSAY
oath subject to the penalty of STATEMENT, which is
perjury at a trial, hearing or other when a declarant testifies
proceeding, or in a deposition; (b) and is subject to cross-
consistent with the declarant’s examination concerning the
testimony and is offered to rebut an statement and the
express or implied charge against statement is: (i) inconsistent
the declarant of recent fabrication with declarant’s testimony;
or improper influence or motive; or (ii) offered to rebut an
(c) one of identification of a person express or implied charge
made after perceiving him or her. against the declarant; or (iii)
one of identification of a
person made after
perceiving him or her
NOTE1: The item on 5. Hearsay is a new item in Rule 130
NOTE2: The old 5. Testimonial Knowledge, Sec. 36 (Testimony generally confined to personal knowledge; hearsay
excluded) was TRANSPOSED to Sec. 22 (Testimony confined to personal knowledge)
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
6. Exceptions To The Parties or assignor of parties In an action against an executor q This is a new section
to a case, or persons in whose or administrator or other regarding the statement of a
Hearsay Rule representative of a deceased decedent or person of
behalf a case is prosecuted,
Sec. 39. Statement of against an executor or person, or against a person of unsound mind.
decedent or person of administrator or other unsound mind, upon a claim or q The amendment requires,
demand against the estate of among others, that any
unsound mind representative of a deceased such deceased person or against statement that will be used in
person, or against a person of such person of unsound mind, an action against an executor,
unsound mind, upon a claim where a party or assignor of a administrator or other
or demand against the estate party or a person in whose representative of a deceased
of such deceased person or behalf a case is prosecuted person or of an unsound mind,
against such person of testifies on a matter of fact should be based on the
unsound mind, cannot testify occurring before the death of the statement of the deceased or
as to any matter of fact decreased person or before the the person of unsound mind
occurring before the death of person became of unsound mind, made upon the personal
any statement of the deceased knowledge of the latter at a
such deceased person or
or the person of unsound time when the matter had
before such person became of
mind, may be received in been recently perceived by
unsound mind (old Sec. 23, evidence if the statement was him/her and while his/her
Rule 130) made upon the personal recollection was clear
knowledge of the deceased or
the person of unsound mind at
a time when the matter had
been recently perceived by him
or her and while his or her
recollection was clear. Such
s t a t e m e n t , h o w e v e r, i s
inadmissible if made under
circumstances indicating its
lack of trustworthiness.
NOTE1: Amendments to 6. Exceptions To The Hearsay Rule, Sec. 38 (Dying declaration), Sec. 46 (Entries in official
records), and Sec. 48 (Learned treatises) are gender-based and pertain to the re-numbering of the said sections
NOTE2: No amendment to 6. Exceptions To The Hearsay Rule, Sec. 47 (Commercial lists and the like), except the re-
numbering of the said section
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED PROVISION REMARKS
PROVISION
6. Exceptions To The The declaration made by a person The declaration made by a person q The amendment in Sec. 40
deceased or unable to testify against deceased or unable to testify against the is, among others, gender-
Hearsay Rule the interest of the declarant, if the interest of the declarant, if the fact asserted based.
Sec. 40. Declaration fact asserted in the declaration was in the declaration was at the time it was q Also, the second sentence
at the time it was made so far made so far contrary to the declarant’s own of Sec. 40 is a new
against interest contrary to declarant’s own interest interest that a reasonable person in his or provision.
that a reasonable man in his position her position would not have made the q The new provision
would not have made the declaration declaration unless he or she believed it to specifies that if the
unless he believed it to be true, may be true, may be received in evidence statement will expose the
be received in evidence against against himself or herself or his or her declarant to criminal
himself or his successors in interest successors in interest and against third liability and offered to
and against third persons. persons. A statement tending to expose exculpate the accused,
the declarant to criminal liability and then this is not admissible
offered to exculpate the accused is not in evidence
admissible unless corroborating
circumstances clearly indicate the
trustworthiness of the statement.
6. Exceptions To The The act or declaration of a person The act or declaration of a person q The amendment in Sec. 41
deceased or unable to testify, in deceased or unable to testify, in respect to includes an act or
Hearsay Rule respect to the pedigree of another the pedigree of another person related to declaration of a deceased
Sec. 41. Act or person related to him by birth or him or her by birth, adoption, or marriage person or one unable to
marriage, may be received in or, in the absence thereof, with whose testify on the pedigree of a
declaration about evidence where it occurred before family he or she was so intimately person related to him/her,
pedigree the controversy, and the relationship associated as to be likely to have not only by birth or
between the two persons is shown accurate information concerning his or marriage, but also by
by evidence other than such act or her pedigree, may be received in evidence adoption
declaration. The word “pedigree” where it occurred before the controversy, q This also involves the
includes relationship, family and the relationship between the two pedigree of a person with
genealogy, birth, marriage, death, the persons is shown by evidence other than whose family he or she
dates when and the places where such act or declaration. The word was so intimately
these facts occurred, and the names “pedigree” includes relationship, family associated for purposes of
of the relatives. It embraces also genealogy, birth, marriage, death, the dates determining his/her
facts of family history intimately when and the places where these facts pedigree
connected with pedigree. occurred, and the names of the relatives. It
embraces also facts of family history
intimately connected with pedigree.
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
6. Exceptions To The Common reputation existing previous Common reputation existing previous q The amendment in the first
to the controversy, respecting facts of to the controversy, as to boundaries sentence of Sec. 43 involves
Hearsay Rule public or general interest more than of or customs affecting lands in common reputation, existing
Sec. 43. Common thirty years old, or respecting the community and reputation as previous to the controversy,
marriage or moral character, may be to events of general history regarding boundaries of or
reputation given in evidence. Monuments and important to the community, or customs affecting lands, as well
inscriptions in public places may be respecting marriage or moral as reputation as to events of
received as evidence of common character, may be given in evidence. general history important to the
reputation. Monuments and inscriptions in public community, among others, may
places may be received as evidence be given in evidence
of common reputation.
6. Exceptions To The Statements made by a person while Statements made by a person while q The amendment to the first
a startling occurrence is taking place a startling occurrence is taking place sentence of Sec. 44 gives
Hearsay Rule or immediately prior or subsequent or immediately prior or subsequent emphasis to the fact that the
Sec. 44. Part of the res thereto with respect to the thereto, under the stress of “statements made by a person
circumstances thereof, may be given excitement caused by the while a startling occurrence is
gestae in evidence as part of the res gestae. occurrence with respect to the taking place”, should be “under
So, also, statements accompanying circumstances thereof, may be given the stress of excitement caused
an equivocal act material to the in evidence as part of the res gestae. by the occurrence”
issue, and giving it a legal So, also, statements accompanying
significance, may be received as part an equivocal act material to the
of the res gestae. issue, and giving it a legal
significance, may be received as part
of the res gestae.
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
6. Exceptions To The Entries made at, or near the A memorandum, report, record q Sec. 45 completely amended
time of transactions to or data compilation of acts, the old Sec. 43 (Entries in the
Hearsay Rule events, conditions, opinions or course of business)
Sec. 45. Records of which they refer, by a diagnoses, made by writing, q This section provides that a
regularly conducted person deceased or unable typing, electronic, optical or memorandum, report, record
to testify, who was in a other similar means at or near or data compilation of acts,
business activity
position to know the facts the time of or from events, conditions, opinions or
therein stated, may be transmission or supply of diagnoses, made by writing,
information by a person with typing, electronic, optical or
received as prima facie knowledge thereof, and kept in other similar means that are
evidence, if such person the regular course or conduct “kept in the regular course or
made the entries in his of a business activity, and conduct of a business
professional capacity or I such was the regular practice activity”, and this was the
the performance of duty to make the memorandum, regular practice as shown by
report, record, or data the testimony of the custodian
and in the ordinary or compilation by electronic, of said items, is excepted from
regular course of business. optical or similar means, all of the rule on hearsay evidence
(old Sec. 43, Rule 130) which are shown by the
testimony of the custodian or
other qualified witnesses, is
excepted from the rule on
hearsay evidence.
6. Exceptions To The The testimony or deposition of The testimony or deposition of a q The amendment in Sec. 49
witness deceased or out of the clarifies that, aside from the
Hearsay Rule a witness deceased or unable
Philippines or who cannot, with testimony or deposition of a
to testify, given in a former
Sec. 49. Testimony or case or proceeding, judicial or
due diligence, be found therein, or deceased witness, the testimony
is unavailable or otherwise unable or a deposition of one who is “out
deposition at a former administrative, involving the to testify, given in a former case or of the Philippines or who cannot,
proceeding same parties and subject proceeding, judicial or administrative, with due diligence, be found
involving the same parties and therein, or is unavailable or
matter, may be given in subject matter, may be given in unable to testify, given in a former
evidence against the adverse evidence against the adverse party case or proceeding involving the
party who had the opportunity who had the opportunity to cross- same parties, may be given in
to cross-examine him. examine him or her. evidence against the adverse
party who had the opportunity to
cross-examine said witness
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
NOTE1: No amendment in 7. Opinion Rule, Sec. 51 (General rule), except the re-numbering of the said section
NOTE2: The amendments in 7. Opinion Rule, Sec. 53 (Opinion of ordinary witnesses) are gender-based and pertain to
the re-numbering of the said sections
RULE 130
RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY – cont.
(c) In the case provided for in (c) In Criminal and Civil Cases q Item (c) for both “Criminal and
Rule 132, Section 14 (Evidence Civil Cases” is a new provision
of good character of witness) Evidence of the good character and completely amends the
of a witness is not admissible old item (c)
until such character has been q The amendment in item (c)
impeached. provides that, among others, ,
“character evidence” is
In all cases in which evidence admissible only if the witness
of character or a trait of is impeached.
character of a person is q Also, in all cases in which
admissible, proof may be made character evidence or a trait
by testimony as to reputation thereof is admissible, proof
or by testimony in the form of thereof may be made by
an opinion. On cross- testimony as to reputation or
examination, inquiry is by testimony in the form of an
allowable into relevant specific opinion.
instances of conduct. q During cross-examination, an
inquiry into relevant specific
In cases in which character or instances of conduct is
a trait of character of a person allowed
is an essential element of a q In cases in which character or
charge, claim or defense, proof a trait of character of a person
may also be made of specific is an essential element of a
instances of that person’s charge, claim or defense,
conduct. proof thereof may be of
specific instances of that
person’s conduct
RULE 131
BURDEN OF PROOF, BURDEN OF EVIDENCE AND
PRESUMPTIONS
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
Sec. 1. Burden of proof Burden of proof is the Burden of proof is the duty q The amendment in the
and burden of evidence duty of a party to of a party to present first paragraph of Sec. 1
evidence on facts in issue is the statement that
present evidence on
necessary to establish his “burden of proof never
facts in issue necessary or her claim or defense by shifts”, as compared to
to establish his claim or the amount of evidence “burden of evidence”
defense by the amount required by law. Burden of q The second paragraph of
of evidence required by proof never shifts. Sec. 1 is a new
law. provision. This is the
Burden of evidence is the reason why Sec. 1 is
duty of a party to present included in its title.
evidence sufficient to q Burden of evidence is
establish or rebut a fact in defined as the duty of a
issue to establish a prima party to present evidence
facie case. Burden of sufficient to establish or
evidence may shift from rebut a fact in issue to
one party to the other in establish a prima facie
the course of the case.
proceedings, depending q Also, burden of evidence
on the exigencies of the may shift from one party
case.
to another in the course
of the proceedings..
NOTE: The amendments in Sec. 2 (Conclusive presumptions), Sec. 3 (Disputable presumptions) and Sec. 4 (No
presumption of legitimacy or illegitimacy) are gender-based and minor clerical corrections
RULE 131
BURDEN OF PROOF, BURDEN OF EVIDENCE, AND PRESUMPTIONS – cont.
Sec. 6. Presumption NO ORIGINAL PROVISION If a presumed fact that q Sec. 6 is a new provision.
establishes guilt is an q It pertains to a presumed fact
against an accused in that establishes guilt and
element of the offense
criminal cases charged, or negates a which is an element of the
offense charge, then the
defense, the existence of
existence of the basic fact
the basic fact must be must be proved beyond
proved beyond reasonable reasonable doubt while the
doubt and the presumed presumed fact follows from
fact follows from the basic the basic fact beyond
fact beyond reasonable reasonable doubt.
doubt.
RULE 132
PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
A. EXAMINATION OF NO ORIGNAL PROVISION For the purpose of q Sec. 12 is a new provision.
WITNESSES impeaching a witness, q The amendment provides
evidence that he or she that impeaching a witness
Sec. 12. Impeachment through evidence of
by evidence of has been convicted by
conviction by final judgment
final judgment of a crime
conviction of crime is admitted provided the
shall be admitted if (a) the
penalty imposed is
crime was punishable by imprisonment of more than
a penalty in excess of one one year or the crime
year; or (b) the crime involved moral turpitude,
involved moral turpitude, regardless of the penalty.
regardless of the penalty.
All other writings are All other writings are q No amendment in the
private. private. third paragraph of Sec.
19
NOTE1: No amendment in B. AUTHENTICATION AND PROOF OF DOCUMENTS, Sec. 21 (When evidence of authenticity of
private document), Sec. 23 (Public documents are evidence), Sec. 26 (Irremovability of public record), Sec. 27 (Public record of a
private document), Sec. 29 (How judicial record impeached), Sec. 30 (Proof of notarial documents), and Sec. 32 (Seal)
NOTE2: The amendments in B. AUTHENTICATION AND PROOF OF DOCUMENTS, Sec. 22 (How genuineness of handwriting
proved), Sec. 25 (What attestation of copy must state), Sec. 28 (Proof of lack of record), Sec. 31 (Alteration in document, how to
explain) and Sec. 33 (Documentary evidence in an unofficial language) are only gender-based.
RULE 132
PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
B. AUTHENTICATION Before any private document Before any private document offered as q The amendment in Sec.20
offered as authentic is received in authentic is received in evidence, its due pertains to a third means to prove
AND PROOF OF evidence, its due execution and execution and authenticity must be the due execution and
DOCUMENTS authenticity must be proved either: proved by any of the following means: authenticity of a private
(a) By anyone who saw the (a) By anyone who saw the document document, i.e., by “other evidence
Sec. 20. Proof of document executed or written; or executed or written; showing its due execution and
private documents (b) By evidence of the genuineness (b) By evidence of the genuineness of the authenticity”, aside from by
of the signature or handwriting of signature or handwriting of the maker; or anyone who saw it being
the maker. (c) By other evidence showing its due executed or proving the
execution and authenticity. genuineness of the signature or
handwriting of the maker
Any other private document need Any other private document need only be q No amendment in the second
only be identified as that which it is identified as that which it is claimed to be. paragraph of Sec. 20.
claimed to be.
B. AUTHENTICATION The record of public documents The record of public documents referred q The amendment in the first
referred to in paragraph (a) of to in paragraph (a) of Section 19, when sentence of Sec. 24 is only
AND PROOF OF Section 19, when admissible for any admissible for any purpose, may be gender-based.
DOCUMENTS purpose, may be evidenced by an evidenced by an official publication q Also, the amendment in the
official publication thereof or by a thereof or by a copy attested by the officer second paragraph of Sec. 24
Sec. 24. Proof of copy attested by the officer having having the legal custody of the record, or provides that the certificate or its
official record the legal custody of the record, or by his or her deputy, and accompanied, if equivalent needed with respect to
by his deputy, and accompanied, if the record is not kept in the Philippines, a record kept in a foreign country,
the record is not kept in the with a certificate that such officer has the which is a contracting party to a
Philippines, with a certificate that custody. If the office in which the record is treaty or convention to which the
such officer has the custody. If the kept is in a foreign country, which is a Philippines is also a party or the
office in which the record is kept is contracting party to a treaty or record is considered a public
in a foreign country, the certificate convention to which the Philippines is document under such treaty or
may be made by a secretary of the also a party, or considered a public convention, shall be in the form
embassy or legation, consul document under such treaty or prescribed under such treaty or
general, consul, vice consul or convention pursuant to paragraph (c) convention, subject to reciprocity
consular agent or by any officer in of Section 19 hereof, the certificate or granted to public documents
the foreign service of the Philippines its equivalent shall be in the form originating from the Philippines
stationed in the foreign country in prescribed by such treaty or
which the record is kept, and convention subject to reciprocity
authenticated by the seal of his granted to public documents
office. originating from the Philippines.
RULE 132
PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
B. AUTHENTICATION For documents originating q The preliminary sentence in the
from a foreign country which is third paragraph of Sec. 24 refers
AND PROOF OF not a contracting party to a to documents originating from a
DOCUMENTS treaty or convention referred to foreign country which is not a
Sec. 24. Proof of official in the next preceding sentence, contracting to a treaty or
the certificate may be made by a convention involving the
record – cont.
secretary of the embassy or Philippines, in which case the
legation, consul general, consul, certificate may be made by a
vice-consul, or consular agent or secretary of the embassy or
by any officer in the foreign legation, consul general, consul,
service of the Philippines vice-consul or consular agent or
stationed in the foreign country in by any officer in the foreign
which the record is kept, and service of the Philippines
authenticated by the seal of his stationed in the foreign country in
office. which the record is kept,
authenticated by the seal of the
office
C. OFFER AND Objection to evidence offered Objection to offer of evidence q The amendment in Sec. 36
orally must be made immediately must be made orally immediately requires all objections to offer
OBJECTION after the offer is made. after the offer is made. of evidence to be done
Sec. 36. Objection ORALLY.
Objection to a question Objection to the testimony of a q Also, an objection to a
propounded in the course of the witness for lack of a formal testimony of a witness for lack
oral examination of a witness offer must be made as soon as of a formal offer must be made
shall be made as soon as the the witness begins to testify. as soon as the witness begins
grounds therefor become Objection to a question to testify.
reasonably apparent. propounded in the course of the q Objection to a question
oral examination of a witness propounded during the trial
An offer of evidence in writing must be made as soon as the must be made as soon as the
shall be objected to within three grounds therefor become grounds therefor become
(3) days after notice unless a reasonably apparent. reasonably apparent.
different period is allowed by the q Further, no more offer of
court. evidence in writing is allowed
as the third paragraph of Sec.
36 was deleted.
NOTE1: No amendment in C. OFFER AND OBJECTION, Sec. 34 (Offer of evidence), Sec. 38 (Ruling), and Sec. 40
(Tender of excluded evidence)
NOTE2: The amendment in C. OFFER AND OBJECTION, Sec. 37 (When repetition of objection unnecessary) is only
gender-based.
RULE 132
PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE – cont.
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED REMARKS
PROVISION PROVISION
C. OFFER AND Should a witness answer the Should a witness answer the q The amendment in Sec. 39
OBJECTION question before the adverse question before the adverse provides that (a) should a
party had the opportunity to party had the opportunity to witness answer the
Sec. 39. Striking out voice fully its objection to the voice fully its objection to the question before being
answer same, and such objection is same, or where a question is objected to, or (b) where a
found to be meritorious, the not objectionable, but the question is not
court shall sustain the answer is not responsive, or objectionable but the
objection and order the where a witness testifies answer is not responsive,
answer given to be stricken off without a questions being or (c) where a witness
the record. posed or testifies beyond testifies without questions
limits set by the court, or being posed or testifies
when the witness does a beyond the limits set by the
narration instead of court, or (d) when the
answering the question, and witness does a narration
such objection is found to be instead of answering the
meritorious, the court shall question, the court shall
sustain the objection and sustain the objection and
order such answer, order such answer,
testimony or narration to be testimony or narration to be
stricken off the record. stricken off the record
On proper motion, the court On proper motion, the court q There is no amendment in
may also order the striking out may also order the striking out the second paragraph of
of answers which are of answers which are Sec. 39
incompetent, irrelevant or incompetent, irrelevant or
otherwise improper. otherwise improper.
RULE 133
WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE
SECTION ORIGINAL AMENDED PROVISION REMARKS
PROVISION
Sec. 4. Circumstantial Circumstantial evidence is Circumstantial evidence is sufficient for q There is no amendment in the first
sufficient for conviction if: conviction if: paragraph of Sec. 4.
evidence, when (a) There is more than one (a) There is more than one circumstance; q The amendment in the second
sufficient circumstance; (b) The facts from which the inferences are paragraph of Sec. 4, which is a new
(b) The facts from which the derived are proven; and provision, stresses that inferences
inferences are derived are proven; (c) The combination of all the cannot be based on other
and circumstances is such as to produce a inferences.
(c) The combination of all the conviction beyond reasonable doubt.
circumstances is such as to Inferences cannot be based on other
produce a conviction beyond inferences
reasonable doubt.
Sec. 5. Weight to be NO ORIGINAL PROVISION In any case where the opinion of an q Sec. 5 is a new provision.
expert witness is received in evidence, q The amendment provides, among
given opinion of the court has a wide latitude of others, that the court has a wide
expert witness, how discretion in determining the weight to latitude of discretion in determining
be given to such opinion, and for that the weight to be given to the opinion
determined purpose may consider the following: of an expert witness.
(a) Whether the opinion is based upon q Also, the court, in exercising such
sufficient facts or data; discretion, may consider the
(b) Whether it is the product of reliable following: (a) whether the opinion is
principles and methods; based on sufficient facts or data; (b)
(c) Whether the witness has applied the whether the opinion is the product of
principles and methods reliably to the reliable principles and methods; (c)
facts of the case; and whether the witness has applied the
(d) Such other factors as the court may principles and methods reliably to
deem helpful to make such the facts of the case; and (d) such
determination other helpful factors
NOTE1: The amendments in Sec. 1 (Preponderance of evidence, how determined) and Sec. 2 (Proof beyond reasonable
doubt) are only gender-based, while in Sec. 7 (Power of the court to stop further evidence) it is to emphasize that the
power to stop further evidence should be exercised with caution and for the re-numbering of the said section
NOTE2: No amendment in Sec. 3 (Extrajudicial confession, not sufficient ground for conviction), while no amendment as
well in Sec. 6 (Substantial evidence) and Sec. 8. (Evidence on motion), except the re-numbering of the said sections