Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Understanding Media
If you ask Professor Marshall McLuhan, media are extensions of our senses
McLuhan, a scholar of James Joyce who was fond of puns and poetry, is famous for
saying
“THE MEDIUM IS THE MESSAGE”
"Societies have always been shaped more by
the nature of the media by which men communicate
than by the content of communication."
Until post-ideographic writing was invented, man lived in circles of acoustic space,
directionless, in the world of emotion, listening for sounds of both beauty and danger,
attuned to primordial intuition.
There were cave drawings and talking heads, but no written words.
2
In tribal cultures without written language, notions of time, space and territoriality are
totally different from the Euro-Western tradition. For primitive and pre-alphabet people
time and space are horizonless, boundless, and multi-sensory. The Eskimo drawing of a
man hunting seal on an ice floe shows what is below the ice, as well as what is in view.
Then the phonetic alphabet tilted our sensory ratio to favor the eye.
Oral languages had been like knots.
With written language, chronological, classified, segmented knowledge took over.
The letters of the alphabet are bits and pieces which are meaningless (in terms of
CONTENT) in themselves. But what impact have they had upon us as FORM?
The alphabet combined fragmented bits that must be strung together bead-like in a
line.
It fostered the habit of perceiving our environment in visual terms, a time and space
that are uniform, continuous, and connected.
The line, the continuum, became the organizing principle of life.
The invention of the printing press confirmed and extended visual bias in Western
culture.
It fostered more linear, visual thinking.
It provided the first uniformly repeatable commodity.
It provided the model for the assembly LINE and the mechanical age.
Break everything down into standard component parts led to industrialization.
Did the alphabet, writing, and later the printed word, foster a particular approach to
logic, and the accepted ordering of ideas?
Absolutely! Linear thinking became equated with rationality.
Logic became depending on sequence (from the Latin “sequor” meaning to follow).
"I don't follow you" came to mean "I don’t think what your saying is rational!”
Is the linear, sequential, “rational, logical" viewpoint always the correct path? Quantum
physicists would say “no”, and I suspect some advertising copywriters would agree.
Artists sometimes offer the first examples of a culture's changing sensory perceptions.
Picasso's early style was conventional, paintings of clowns and lovers in the Blue and
Pink periods. 1906-13 it changed: he abandoned the fixed perspective that had
dominated painting; "cubism" brought in many different vantage points, all angles at
once, all on the canvas at the same instant.
At an accelerating pace over the last one hundred and fifty years, new communications
media have continuously reshaped our sensory environment: still photography, the
telegraph, motion pictures, the telephone, several generations of sound recording
technology, radio, the talkies, television, instant and color photography, transistor radio,
videotape, satellite communications, broadband, photocopy, fax machines, telephone
answering machines, beepers, portable phones, computers, laptops, modems, e-mail
and the internet, fiber optic broadband networks, digital imaging, data compression and
digital storage media, wireless appliances and hybrids of these media.
Professor McLuhan, who died in 1980, predicted that the electronic communications
media of our age would retribalize our culture drastically altering our sense ratios in a
way which could reverse the effects of the phonetic alphabet.
For instance, the film artist's vocabulary today includes not only the editorial twisting of
time, lenses and special effects warping space, and three dimensional sound, but also
computer flight simulators and early forms of virtual reality that will some day give us
interactions like those seen on Star Trek’s holodeck.
McLuhan asks four questions to clarify the nature & impact of a medium-
1. What does enhance or amplify in the culture?
2. What does it obsolesce or push out of prominence?
3. What does retrieve from the past, from the realm of the previously obsolesced?
4. What doees the medium reverse flip into when it reaches the limits of its potential?”
Martin Luther understood that the Gutenberg Bible had decentralized access to the
"word of God". Translating it into vernacular German, he enabled laymen to read the
Scriptures, undermining the authority of the priesthood. This was a major factor in the
Protestant Reformation.
The computer graphics vocabulary of recent motion pictures is reshaping the syntax
of the next generation of movie-goers, much as television commercials reshaped the
sensibilities of the first generation to grow up on TV, fifty years ago. Remember,
McLuhan didn’t advocate these changes as a good thing – he simply encouraged us to
note them..
Now, besides giving us new languages to learn, what else have these new media
wrought on our culture? Let’s take a quick inventory of some characteristics and
effectsof the electronic media. Exactly how has our world been transformed?
5
Communication is Instantly Everywhere [in print the deal was "we haven't heard
from Ambassador Benjamin Franklin in Paris this year...we should write him a letter"]
Media also merge and mutate. The telephone and the radio combined technology
and became cell phones, which are now about to change again due to digital
technology. Computers moved from text to icons, to audio and full motion video and
may now converge with telephones and cable television.
The interaction among media is greater that the sum of the individual parts.
“Successful” content snowballs and generates growing momentum. This tendency will
grow as individual gain access to newer and more sophisticated media with which to
replicate content.
Broadcast media such as TV are conducive to large, shared live events and
remain the most essential ingredient for triggering large events involving other media.
The media amplify certain stories that play into their "language" In addition
to shorter form humor, sound bites, emotion, and surprising visuals, media-genic stories
often involve scandal, celebrities, conflict, including criminally violent conflict as well as
conflict between global village "tribes" such as nations or ethnic groups.
All media are interactive As message highways, some media seem to be one-way
streets (e.g. most broadcast TV -- extending this metaphor, think of ratings as a
sidewalk allowing some movement back in the other direction); others seem to be more
participatory two-way streets (the telephone) or an intersection (conference phones or
call-in radio). Has the power of one-way media peaked in 20th century? Only until the
next Super Bowl, or the next world crisis. Earlier this century Alduous Huxley warned us
"never before in human history have so many listeners been at the mercy of so few
speakers" Or, for those buying time in the television upfront: never before have so
many advertisers been at the mercy of so many networks offering so few viewers.
Effects on News and Information TV codes the news differently from newspapers.
The script for 80% of one nightly news program could fit in a single column of one page
of the NY Times. (What would be missing would be the intonation, and the pictures).
“(The new media have ) aided us in the recovery of intense awareness of facial
language and bodily gesture. If these "mass media" should serve only to weaken or
corrupt previously achieved levels of verbal and pictorial culture, it won't be because
there's anything inherently wrong with them. It will be because we've failed to master
them as new languages in time to assimilate them to our total cultural heritage” –
Edmund Carpenter
Note that media have different vocabularies. TV itself codes the politicians differently
from newspapers. The newspapers require the politician's policy statements; TV
requires his self-assurance. Beyond the biases of the reporters’, which are the other
biases of the medium itself? Does ease of access cause too much emphasis on politics,
compared to, for instance, coverage of business and technological change? Do our
media cover the globe, or just our neighborhood? Could they do more to tell us
interesting stories about various cultures?
Effects on Education Educators wary of the new media might consider McLuhan's
observation that "We become robots when uncritically involved with our technologies."
The printing press changed not only the quantity of writing, but the character of language and the
relations between author and public.
Radio, film, TV pushed written English towards the spontaneous shifts and freedom of the spoken idiom.
They aided us in the recovery of intense awareness of facial language and bodily gesture.
If these "mass media" should serve only to weaken or corrupt previously achieved levels of verbal and
pictorial culture, it won't be because there's anything inherently wrong with them.
It will be because we've failed to master them as new languages in time to assimilate them to our total
cultural heritage...
Few students ever acquire skill in analysis of newspapers.
Fewer have any ability to discuss a movie intelligently.
9
To be articulate and discriminating about ordinary affairs and information is the mark of an
educated man.
It's misleading to suppose there's any basic difference between education and entertainment...It's like
setting up a distinction between didactic and lyric poetry on the ground that one teaches, the other
pleases. However it's always been true that whatever pleases teaches more effectively."
--Classroom Without Walls, Marshall McLuhan EXPLORATIONS #8 (1957); reprinted in McLUHAN HOT &
COOL (Stearn, ed.)