Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Explain why financing a fiscal deficit will either cause: 1) inflation; 2) the
crowding out effect which reduces economic growth and or; 3) chronic
exchange rate depreciation. In addition, why does Central Bank money creation
allow the government to accumulate more debts and become bigger? Why
does this lead to more inflation and taxation in the long run?
- Fiscal deficit or budget deficit, which is the phenomenon where government
spending exceeds the tax collected from consumers, causes three primary
effects;
1. Inflation - As fiscal deficits occur, in order for the government to
continue their projects, this will require and result in them
borrowing money from the central bank which in turn requires the
bank to print out more money which then increases the money
supply in circulation. And with the surplus of money creation, this
would cause a faster growth for total demand than total supply
consequently causing an inflation problem which reduces the value
of money the public uses to purchase goods and services, thereby
lowering living standards
2. The crowding out effect - On the other hand is the theory that
through rising public sector spending, this drives down or
eliminates private sector spending which is somewhat related to
inflation. As public sector spending increases, this requires more
money supply in circulation. And to make up for this increased
public sector spending would either need to increase taxes
imposed to consumers or again, borrow more money from the
central bank. By increasing taxes, this would consequently lead to
a reduced purchase capacity for consumers as they are fined more
taxes for government projects. By borrowing money from the
central bank on the other hand, money in circulation rises later
causing inflation which would consequently reduce the value of the
public’s money, thereby reducing private sector spending.
3. Chronic exchange rate depreciation - Lastly, fiscal deficits may also
cause chronic exchange rate depreciation. Chronicle exchange
rate depreciation which is defined as the decrease in value of a
currency occurs as fiscal deficits cause spontaneous decreasing
changes in monetary value of an economy due to inflation and the
crowding out effect. Consequently, this downward leading
currency scares potential investors due to its potential to further
decrease monetary value.
Caused by continuous government spending and borrowing, Central banks’ money
creation allows the government to accumulate more debt which leads to the
government being bigger. By letting the government borrow more money, this
requires the bank to print out more money, thereby increasing the money supply in
circulation which causes inflation in the long run. As government loans increase on the
other hand, the government continues to grow, and to decrease these loans, the
government passes it on to the consumers through taxation. This consequently leads
to increased taxes on the consumers.
2. Discuss the four objectives behind macroeconomic stability and explain how the
attainment of each objective is expected to improve living standards for everyone. In
addition, how is an economy’s performance under each objective measured, and
what should be the ideal target for each of the objectives?
By achieving the four objectives of macroeconomic stability this leads to an
improvement in living standards for everyone through…
1. Sustained economic growth
- By achieving sustained economic growth where increases in real GDP are
at a rate of 5 - 7%, this helps improve living standards through the
productivity of the economy. By achieving this sustained growth, an
economy is freed from potential significant economic problems by
reducing the need for trade-offs as a country achieves a sustained
growth. Meaning that they are able to grow in a sustainable manner
where trade-offs for increased growth which may also lead to negative
effects in the future are not required . Furthermore, the increase in real
GDP roughly helps indicate an improvement in people’s standards of
living as this points out to more economic activity within the economy.
2. Price stability
- By achieving price stability or low inflation rates of 2-3%, living standards
are improved as consumers are able to afford and purchase and pursue
their own interests, necessities and luxuries at the optimal value of their
own money.
3. Reduced Unemployment
- By having most of the population employed, this increases productivity
and economic activity. Consequently, by working, people are paid which
basically allows them to improve their own living standards as they
achieve the capability to supply their own necessities and luxuries for
themselves and their families. This would also continue for the future
generations as children are able to go to educational institutions which
allows for learning and development which leads to employment in the
future, hence creating a cycle where employment is reduced.
4. Manageable balance of payments
-
3. Explain how achieving the goal of economic efficiency and equity is going to
improve living standards for everyone and discuss the reasons why these goals are
better accomplished under a free market as compared to a central planning system
where the government directly produces the goods and services in the economy.
- By achieving economic efficiency and equity, competitive or free markets are
technically born as this removes hindrances to opportunities. By removing
potential barriers or restrictions, people are allowed to pursue their own profit
incentivized goals. This would lead to the free entry of businesses and firms in
the market spurring increased competition all the while allowing for increased
employment opportunities. As people pursue their own interests with profit as
the primary motivator, they are then further incentivized to improve and
contribute more of their work as a means of increasing profit, which in turn also
improves work output and production. This in turn benefits everyone as living
standards continuously improve as they pursue profit-oriented goals, thus
allowing for better lifestyles and standards.
On the other hand, if heavy government intervention were to occur, this would
lead to decreased incentives on work which would cause a continuous effect on
work output leading to a decreased living standard.
4. By referring to the macroeconomic equation: Y=C+I+G+X-M, explain how each of
the five types of macroeconomic policies will generate economic growth by identifying
which expenditure variable is directly affected by a particular type of macroeconomic
policy and its corresponding instruments or tools.
1. Trade Liberalization - Allows for economic growth through the reduction of tariff
rates, quotas and non-tariff barriers to encourage exports and allow for market
expansion for local firms. ALong with foreing investment liberalization, with local
goods improving, export quality improves as well which allows for a more
competitive output quality.
2. Foreign Investment liberalization - Directly attributable to the X variable of
exports, this generates economic growth by allowing for competition and the
entry of foreign investors and firms in the country. Consequently, this spurs job
growth and employment, innovation, competition and expansions or
improvements in production capacity of a certain industry of a country.
3. FInancial Liberalization - Attributable to the C variable or consumption
4. Privatization - By selling government owned and controlled corporations, this
consequently leaves the corporations to a competitive market, thus, these firms
and companies must then find the initiative to improve and better their products
to best their competitors. This would also lead to a more efficient output as
these entities become profit-oriented or incentivized contrary to being
government owned which leads to complatecny
5. Deregulation - By removing price controls subsidies and the dismantlement of
government owned monopolies, this spurs competition in a specific industry
which leads to economic growth as firms must improve their output of goods
5. Explain how each of the following forms of government intervention create more
bad outcomes despite their good intentions and discuss how these affect
macroeconomic stability:
5.1 Protecting local industries from imports by imposing high tariffs, quotas and
non-tariff barriers
- Through high tariff protections, quotas and non-tariff barriers, although local
industries are protected, this leads to a greater negative impact on economic
outcomes. With local industries being protected through the prevention of
imported goods, consumers are forced to purchase local products of inferior
quality. Knowing that they are protected on the other hand, local firms become
complacent with their own outputs which leads to a stagnant industry as goods
are neither improved nor bested by competitors due to the lack of competition.
By preventing imports, this also prevents the entry of new ideas for local
industries which in turn slows down innovation and industrial development,
hence, leaving local industries at a disadvantage, inferior quality of goods and a
lesser efficient rate of production, contrary to industries from other countries.
5.2 Subsidizing farmers and government owned and controlled firms in industry
- By subsidizing farmers and government owned and controlled firms in the
industry, similar to the protection of local industries, the subsidy on farmers
leads to a lesser quality of output. Although they have been receiving financial
support, the industry ceases to develop and grow meaning there is no
practicality in the financial support towards farmers. Subsidizing government
owned and controlled firms on the other hand acts the same way. By subsidizing
government owned firms, firms became complacent as well leading to a
stagnant industry knowing they are financially supported either way.
5.3 Providing free cash to the unemployed, single mothers, free housing, and free
food
- Through the provision of short term benefits, although this instantly improves
consumer living standards, this causes a negative impact on the long run as this
causes increased state dependency.
5.4 Providing free public education at all levels and generous social security benefits
to the elderly.
- By providing free public education at all levels, like any other industry without
competition, educational institutions find no need to improve quality of output
given that they are publicly funded and run. Contrary to private education where
profit is an incentive to improve work and education quality, public education
lessens educational standards. This goes the same with generous social security
benefits where people may also become complacent on the benefits of the
government leading to a less incentivized worker.