One must understand that the socialism aspect of National Socialism isn't an

economical one, it's rather a mindset/philosophical one.

It can be summed up as:

To each his own, but above all, the common interest before self interest.

>��Socialist� I define from the word �social� meaning in the main �social equity�.
A Socialist is one who serves the common good without giving up his individuality
or personality or the product of his personal efficiency.

>Our adopted term �Socialist has nothing to do with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is
anti-property; true socialism is not. Marxism places no value on the individual, or
individual effort, of efficiency; true Socialism values the individual and
encourages him in individual efficiency, at the same time holding that his
interests as an individual must be in consonance with those of the community. All
great inventions, discoveries, achievements were first the product of an individual
brain. It is charged against me that I am against property, that I am an atheist.
Both charges are false.�

RESOURCES:
>25 Demands of National Socialism:
http://youtu.be/cgltok5yYeY [Embed]
>Rodney Martin - The Economic Plan of the NSDAP
http://youtu.be/pKnFN8P21-0 [Embed]
>German Economic Miracle of the 1930's
http://youtu.be/YkenkfRTn4c [Embed]
>Hitler's Economic Reform:
http://youtu.be/_r9Z-hTn1r4 [Embed]
>NatSoc Economics
http://aryanism.net/politics/economics/
>How Hitler tackled unemployment and revived Germany�s economy
http://www.ihr.org/other/economyhitler2011.html
>Against the Mainstream: Nazi privatization in 1930's Germany (Germa Bel)
http://ub.edu/graap/EHR.pdf
>Hitler's Economic Miracle
http://pridecomethbeforeafall.wordpress.com/2014/02/10/hitlers-economic-miracle/

>One of the most plagued questions we get when talking about Fascism is economics,
normally brought up by people still stuck in a liberal mentality and limited scope
of perception, where everything is defined in term of social and economic policies,
rather than principles derived from the notion of a singular Truth and Order that
dominates the world. The variety of historic economic plans and practices
maintained by various champions of our Struggle likewise distorts any comprehensive
answer to the question. All in all we've simply answered people that economics are
secondary, they don't matter in such a way as to be a fundamental and defining
element of Fascism. The answer didn't change, however there is now a way in which
we can describe this attitude to economics, and it's actually a word we've used
repeatedly in reference to Fascism anyway: Socialism.

>Our Socialism, however, is not in of itself an economic system, it is not the

Socialism of Marx and co and stands in direct opposition to both Communism and
Capitalism. It would be more accurate to say that to Fascism, Socialism is the
definitive social structure which is more comparable to the structures of
Individualism and Collectivism, yet it stands in opposition to those two structures
as well.

BOOKS:
>Gottfried Feder - The Program Of The NSDAP The National Socialist Workers' Party
And Its General Conceptions
http://archive.org/details/GottfriedFeder_TheProgramOfTheNSDAP
>Gottfried Feder - Das Programm der NSDAP (Deutsch)
http://archive.org/details/Feder-Gottfried-Das-Programm-der-NSDAP
>Gottfried Feder - Manifesto For The Abolition Of Interest Slavery
http://archive.org/details/GottfriedFederManifestoForTheAbolitionOfInterestSlavery1
919
>Germany Speaks - by 21 Leading Members of Party and State
http://der-fuehrer.org/bucher/english/Germany%20Speaks.pdf
>Wilhem Baur - Terramare Publications #11 - German Economic Policy
http://archive.org/details/GermanEconomicPolcy