Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
net/publication/316055766
CITATIONS READS
12 2,766
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Palliative Care with expressive arts methods: Train-the-trainers program View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Joshua Nan on 28 February 2019.
1. Introduction
Mental health professionals worldwide have noticed the pressing need of treating
mental illness in the community that is more cost-effective than conventional
hospitalization. The King’s Fund of London suggests sustainable effort and
strength-based approach to help people with mental health problems return to work
during the rehabilitation process (McCrone, Dhanasiri, Patel, Knapp, & Lawton-Smith,
2008). One such example is that 50% among the 40,000 diagnosed schizophrenic
patients in Hong Kong, are treated primarily in the community (Hong Kong Hospital
Authority, 2011). Correspondingly, a brand new mode of mental health services – the
Integrated Community Center for Mental Wellness (ICCMW) has been innovated in
recent years that provides community-based, short-term supportive services for
mental health outpatients (Hong Kong Hospital Authority, 2011). Art therapy is one
of the supplementary treatment approaches, in addition to pharmacological
treatment.
Cognitive dysfunction is often reported in Major Depression Disorder (MDD) with the
usual difficulties in concentrating, indecisiveness, and memory (Trivedi & Greer,
2014). Another common disorder closely related to MDD and cognitive dysfunction is
alexithymia. Alexithymia is characterized as a deficit in the cognitive processing of
affect. It exhibits in the difficulty to separate emotion expression from sensational
processes and articulate inner processes with conscious, verbal form to
communication (Karlsson, Naatanen, & Stenman, 2008; Kronholm, Partonen,
Salminen, Mattila, & Joukamaa, 2007). Despite the fact that antidepressants can help
improve cognitive symptoms, it does not persist effectively (Trivedi & Greer, 2014).
Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy or combined psychotherapy with
fluoxetine for depressed patients are evidenced to be more efficacious in improving
neurocognitive functioning than fluoxetine alone (Bastos et al., 2013). Short-term or
long-term psychotherapy are also able to positively enhancing daily functioning in
working abilities (Knekt, Lindfors, Sares-Jäske, Virtala, & Härkänen, 2013).
Studies on EEG documented the differences in the brain’s activities between artists
and non-artists. Results show significantly stronger long-range, delta band
synchronization between frontal and temporo-occipital electrodes in the artists
group as well as strong right hemispheric dominance in terms of synchronization
(Bhattacharya & Petsche, 2002, 2005). In artists, the higher synchrony in the
low-frequency band (delta-band) is probably owing to the participation of a higher
level and long-term visual art memory and extensive top-down processing hint at the
involvement of more complex activity in the neocortex. The results show that in
artists, functional cooperation between cortical regions during drawing from
memory was notably different from those in non-artists (Bhattacharya & Petsche,
2002, 2005).
2. Methods
2. 1. Design
The study is a randomized controlled trial comparing Clay Art therapy (CAT) with
nondirective Visual Art control group (VA) that investigates the effects of clay art
making, guided by an art therapist, on depressed mood of MDD patients. Both
groups of participants are on medical treatment. Major assessments were at baseline
(T0), immediate postintervention (T1), and 3-weeks postintervention (T2).
Randomization to CAT group and VA group was done using computer-generated
random numbers.
Sample size was calculated to achieve a medium effect size of 0.15, at 80% power
and a significance level of 0.05 in repeated measures MANOVA under the proposed
experimental/control group, and three time-points design. Including the clinical and
demographic factors affecting intervention outcome and adjusting for a 25% attrition
rate, a total of 120 participants (60 per arm) is required.
The investigation has obtained ethical approval from the local institutional review
board and the informed consent of the participants was obtained.
2.2. Participants
Inclusion criteria: 1. Diagnosed MDD by psychiatrist, 2. Age 18 to 60, male or female,
3. Patients were on regular medical treatment, 4. The Chinese version of the
Beck-Depression-Inventory-II (BDI-II-C) was applied for screening. With reference to
the post-treatment test results from the pilot study (mean and minimum scores were
19/12 [Time 1); 18/3 [Time 2)); cut-off point for inclusion was set at 18 scores, the
upper limit of mild forms of depression (scores 14-19) (Beck, Steer, & Garbin, 1988;
Nan & Ho, 2014), 5. Participants had to be currently receiving services from an
ICCMW for depression outpatients, 6. Approximately 6-8 group members for each
group recruited on a convenience basis.
Exclusion criteria: Individuals with psychosis and/or suicidal attempts/tendencies
were excluded.
2.3. Procedure
Participants were recruited from three ICCMWs located in different areas because
one ICCMW did not have enough samples available for this study within the
investigation period. All of the participants were referred by the social workers
responsible for them. Participants were informed of the objectives, duration, content,
process of the groups, and other ethical considerations prior to signing the consent
form to join the groups and filling out the questionnaires. Upon confirmation of
reaching the inclusion scores by the BDI-II-C, participants were randomized to CAT or
VA treatment groups. The treatment started in the following week.
2.4. Interventions
Clay Art Therapy (CAT) takes the approach to divide the treatment mechanisms into
four major aspects – the Kinesthetic/Sensory, Perceptual/Affective,
Cognitive/Symbolic and the Creative processes. The primary goal of utilizing these
treatment mechanisms aimed at monitoring the dysregulated affective process by
enhancing and balancing activities on the physical aspect (Kinesthetic and Sensory)
and functioning on other psychological processes (Perceptual, Affective, Cognitive,
Symbolic, and Creative) (Hinz, 2009).
The CAT group was held with six 2.5 hours weekly sessions. Apart from clay art
making, in-depth verbal group sharing on the clay-work process and clay products
was included for reflection at the end of each session. An art therapist facilitated the
clay art making processes and an activity worker of the serving ICCMW was assigned
to be the co-facilitator for the group, in assisting the art therapist in-charge with
coordination and administrative work.
The VA group was also held with six 2.5 hours weekly session. The group was
conducted by social workers. The group contents were similar to those of the
ordinary interest class provided by the serving participating agencies that included a
variety of content based on the preferences of the participants. These activities
included making handcraft work, coloring mandalas, verbal sharing, listening to
relaxation music or a combination of these activities. All VA group members were
subsequently arranged to join the CAT group after the completion of the study.
2.5. Measures
The Chinese version of the Beck-Depression-Inventory-II (BDI-II-C) was adapted from
the original BDI–II and is an established and validated scale measuring levels of
depression (Beck et al., 1988; Byrne, Stewart, & Lee, 2004). The BDI-II-C has 21
questions, each answer being scored on a scale value from 0 to 3, with higher total
scores show more severe depressive symptoms.
The Twenty Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale – Chinese (TAS-20-C) has 20 items, with
each item measured on a 5-point Likert scale within which 5 of the items are
negatively arranged. The TAS-20 consists of 3 factors: (1) DIF—problem recognizing
feelings and differentiating them from the bodily sensations of emotions (7 items); (2)
DDF—problem depicting feelings to others (5 items); and (3) EOT—an externally
directed cognitive way of thinking (8 items). The TAS-20-C has shown acceptable
internal and retest reliability when applied to Chinese populations (Zhu et al., 2007).
2.6. Analysis
All analyses were conducted with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS
version 18.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Continuous data were presented by mean and
standard deviation (SD). Categorical data were presented by frequency (percentage).
Between-group differences at baseline were assessed by chi-squared test for
categorical data and independent t-test for continuous data.
Baseline sociodemographic and clinical variables are detailed in Table 1. The mean
age of the participants was 46.1 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.5) in CAT group
and 44.1 years (SD = 10) in the VA group. Eighty-nine percent of the participants in
this study were female (90.4% in CAT group and 87.5% in VA group). A total of 44.2%
participants in the CAT group and 37.5% in the VA group had been diagnosed with
MDD in the previous 0–3 years, whereas 21.2% in the CAT group and 35.4% in the VA
group had been diagnosed with depression more than 10 years earlier. These results
reflected an interesting phenomenon, namely that the period since diagnosis did not
appear to affect the motivation of participants to join the study.
The average BDI-II-C score in the CAT group was 32.77 (SD = 9.18), defined as a
moderate form of depression according to BDI-II-C, whereas the average score in the
VA group was 28.77 (SD = 11.54), closer to the lower range of moderate depression
(29 – 63).
The average TAS-20 in the CAT group was 65.34 (SD = 9.21) and 59.98 (SD = 10.59) in
the VA group, with more than a total scores of 60 showing high Alexithymia. Except
in TAS-20 scores, no significant baseline differences in the three other measures were
identified between the groups and no significant differences in sociodemographic
variables between the two groups.
3.2. Efficacy
As shown in Table 2, the BDI-II-C (d = -1.1), GHQ-12 (d = -0.9), and BMSWBI total
scores (d = 0.6) significantly improved in the CAT group immediately after treatment
(T1) (all p values < .001), and the improvements were all maintained at T2 (all p
values < 0.001). In the VA group, the changes in the BDI-II-C (d = -0.3), GHQ-12 (d =
-0.3), and BMSWB total scores (d = 0.3) were nonsignificant immediately at T1 and T2
(all p values > 0.05). Although the scores changed with time, the magnitude of
improvement was slight.
The TAS-20 score (d = -0.2) did not improve significantly in the CAT group at T1 (p >
0.05), but did at T2 (d = -0.4, p < 0.01). In the VA group, the change in the TAS-20
score (d = -0.1) was nonsignificant immediately at T1 and T2 (all p values > 0.05).
Although the score changed with time, the magnitude of improvement was slight
and inconsistent.
The scores of the BMSWBI subscales of the CAT group had significant improvement
immediately at T1, with Daily Functioning (d = 0.5, p < 0.001), Positive Affect (d = 0.7,
p < 0.001), Negative Affect (d = -0.6, p < 0.001), Spirit scale of Tranquility (d = 0.5, p <
0.001), and Spirit scale of Disorientation (d = -0.5, p < 0.01), and the improvements
were maintained at T2 (all p values < .001). Although Physical Distress (d = -0.1) and
Spirit scale of Resilience (d = 0.3) did not significantly improve at T1, significant
change was demonstrated at T2 (d = -0.3, p < 0.05; d = 0.5, p < 0.01, respectively).
The magnitudes of improvement of all BMSWBI subscales ranged from moderate to
strong and were generally constant.
In the VA group, only Positive Affect (d = 0.4, p < 0.05) and Negative Affect (d = - 0.4,
p < 0.05) significantly improved at T1, and only Positive Affect was maintained at T2
(d = 0.3, p < 0.05). The Spirit scale of Disorientation change was nonsignificant at T1
(d = -0.3, p > 0.05) but was significant at T2 (d = -0.5, p < 0.05). The scores of the
other BMSWBI subscales did not significantly improve at T1 or T2 (p > 0.05).
The correlations of depression signs, as indicated by BDI-II-C, with the other aspects
of change are shown in Table 4. At baseline, BDI-II-C was positively correlated with
GHQ-12 (R = 0.578, p < 0.01), and negatively corrected with BMS_WHOLE (R = -0.670,
p < 0.01) and TAS-20 (R = -0.298, p < 0.05). BDI-II-C was positively correlated with the
BMSBWI subscales of BMS_A (physical distress) (R = 0.496, p < 0.01), BMS_NeA
(negative affect) (R = 0.672, p < 0.01), and BMS_D_Dis (spirit_disorientation) (R =
0.346, p < 0.01); and BDI-II-C was negatively correlated with BMS_B (daily
functioning) (R = -0.400, p < 0.01), BMS_PoA (positive affect) (R = -0.407, p <0.01),
and BMS_D_Tr (spirit_tranquility) (R = -0.342, p < 0.05), but it was not correlated
with BMS_D_Res (spirit_resilience) (R = -0.070, p > 0.05).
The change in BDI-II-C at T1 was positively correlated with the changes in GHQ-12 (R
= 0.736, p < 0.01) and TAS-20 (R = 0.347, p < 0.05), and negatively correlated with
BMS_WHOLE (R = -.788, p < 0.01). The correlations were maintained in the changes
from T0 to T1 and T0 to T2. The correlation strength of BDI-II-C was strong with
GHQ-12 and BMS_WHOLE, and moderate with TAS-20.
The correlations of BDI-II-C with the BMSWBI subscales show that the change in
BDI-II-C (T1) was positively correlated with the changes in BMS_A (R = 0.555, p <
0.01), BMS_NeA (R = 0.681, p < 0.01), and BMS_D_Dis (R = 0.673, p < 0.01) and
negatively correlated with BMS_B (R = -.507, p < 0.01), BMS_PoA (R = -.695), and
BMS_D_Tr (R = -.460, p < 0.01). The correlations were maintained in the changes
from T0 to T1 and from T0 to T2. The correlation of BDI-II-C with BMS_D_Res was
nonsignificant from T0 to T1 (R = -.242, p > .05) but was significant from T0 to T2 (R =
-.323, p < 0.05). Generally, the strength of correlation of BDI-II-C with the BMSWBI
subscales ranged from moderate to strong.
4. Discussion
4.3. Limitations
Although this study demonstrated the benefits of CAT among patients with
depression, the participants were all adults and most were women. The mean age of
the participants were 46.1 years (SD = 10.5) in the CAT group and 44.1 years (SD = 10)
in the VA control group respectively, in which 89% of the participants in the study
were female. The age group and gender bias may limit the power of this research
project and affect the generalizability of the study findings. This study proposes that
CAT be adopted as an intervention protocol with other age or population groups.
Another limitation that may create research bias lies in the design of the control
group. The use of nondirective art mixed media as control and led by a social worker
may arouse speculation from the participants that the real art therapy treatment was
in the CAT group and created Hawthorne effect and affect the research results. It
might be technically difficult and short of resources to locate another creative arts
therapist, such as, a music therapist, and compared the effects of CAT intervention
with music therapy. However, it is considerable to have a ceramicist to lead a clay
work control group, in comparing therapeutic and nontherapeutic use of clay work.
The selection of depression outpatients was a response to test the possibility to treat
mental illness in community setting. However, the setting of ICCMW poses potential
difficulty to effective data collection owing to the mobility of outpatients in
supportive community service setting, namely, ICCMW. With 44.2% of the CAT group
participants and 37.5% of the VA group participants being diagnosed with depression
for a duration of 0-3 years, it gave a hint that these newly diagnosed depression
patients might only receive short term supportive services in the community setting.
Once the symptoms of depression was stabilized, they would be discharged from the
ICCMW. The usual practice of posttreatment data collection was treatment sessions x
2, meaning 12 weeks after completion of CAT treatment in this study. However, 12
weeks postintervention (T2) data collection might not be feasible in the ICCMW
setting.
Another limitation was the dosage of treatment. As shown from the quantitative
results, alleviation of depressive signs in the BDI-II-C was 20.4 (T1) and 19.3 (T2). The
results showed that depressive signs were alleviated to the minimal form of
depression. It was speculated that longer treatment duration might benefit more
profound reduction of depressive signs and even possible improvement in cognitive
function of articulating affect in TAS-20 measurement. Future research direction will
be testing whether longer treatment duration (e.g. three months, six months or a
year) will be able to create optimal treatment effects of CAT. It is also recommended
to apply use of clay in different setting and investigate how clay work could be
related to possible reduction of suicidal tendency, improvement of quality of life, and
functioning in various aspects of life.
Despite the fact that clay work has been documented as a distinct therapeutic
medium (Sholt & Gavron, 2006), Clay is not a typical art medium; clay work requires
a specific set of techniques that differ intrinsically from those used in 2D art forms
such as drawing and painting. The firing of clay works also requires special
equipment, in particular a kiln. Installing and using a kiln in an art studio necessitates
special and frequent maintenance. The technical problems are not unresolvable;
however, promoting ceramic art in art education and art therapy training and
education programs is necessary. Furthermore, researchers must investigate the
therapeutic effects of a complete procedure of pottery art making in clinical
treatment, instead of testing effects of clay by interacting with it for a few minutes.
Art therapy educators must train art therapists who also are competent potters. By
doing so, the healing power of CAT can be utilized throughout the art therapy
profession.
For CAT involves both the mind and the body to intervention, assessing the impact by
more precisely measuring both psychological and physiological change in the future
research is essential. It is also one of the major limitations of this study that the
research results are self-reported measures. To measure physiological change, a
commonly measured biomarker for tracking the ANS is heart rate variability (HRV),
with lower HRV indicative of reduced parasympathetic cardiac control that has been
associated with disorders, such as sleep problems and difficulty in regulating
emotions (Evans et al., 2013). Another most often measured biomarker is cortisol, a
hormone indicative of change of stress response. Cortisol has been found effectively
changed in cancer patients who received Dance/Movement Therapy (R. T. H. Ho &
Fong, 2013) although it is scarcely used to measure effect of art therapy, to the
knowledge of the authors.
Gender
Female
47 (90.4%)
42 (87.5%)
.443
Employment
Full-time
Housewife
Unemployed
Other
7 (13.5%)
18 (34.6%)
19 (36.5%)
8 (15.4%)
2 (4.2%)
7 (14.6%)
28 (58.3%)
11 (23%) .061
Education
Uneducated/Primary
Secondary school
Tertiary or above
16 (30.8%)
24 (46.2%)
12 (23.1%)
7 (14.6%)
32 (66.7%)
9 (18.8%) .064
Marital status
Single
Married
Divorced/separated
Widowed
13 (25%)
22 (42.3%)
13 (25%)
4 (7.7%)
24 (50%)
12 (25%)
10 (20.8%)
2 (4.2%) .068
Years diagnosed with depression
0-3 years
3.1 years-7 years
7.1 years-10 years
More than 10 years
23 (44.2%)
12 (23.1%)
6 (11.5%)
11 (21.2%)
18 (37.5%)
7 (14.6%)
6 (12.5%)
17 (35.4%) .383
BDI-II-C 32.27 (9.18), 1.27 (SE) 28.77 (11.54), 1.67 (SE) .95
GHQ-12 22.47 (7.50), 1.04 (SE) 20.44 (6.40), 0.92 (SE) .15
BMSWBI_WHOLE 237.76 (69.17), 9.60 (SE) 263.14 (63.69), 9.19 (SE) .06
* TAS-20 65.34 (9.21), 1.27 (SE) 59.98 (10.59), 1.53 (SE) *.008
* Chi-squared test for categorical variable and T-test for continuous variables;
* SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error
* Abbreviations: BMS_WHOLE, the Body–Mind–Spirit–Well-Being Inventory total
scores
* p = .000 * p = .001
* p = .014 p = .185
Table 4: Correlations in CAT Group of Depressive Sign Changes with General Health,
Body–Mind–Spirit–Well-Being, Verbal Expression of Inner Process, and BMSWBI
subscales.
Change of BDI-II-C ( p)
Primary & Secondary Measures T0 p T1 p T2 p
Change of GHQ-12 0.578 ** < 0.01 0.736 ** < 0.01 0.724** < 0.01
Change of BMS_WHOLE -0.670 ** < 0.01 -0.778** < 0.01 -0.825** < 0.01
Change of TAS-20 -0.298 * < 0.05 0.347* < 0.05 0.476** < 0.01
BMSWBI Subscales T0 p T1 p T2 p
BMS_A (physical distress) 0.496 ** < 0.01 0.555** < 0.01 0.723** < 0.01
BMS_B (daily functioning) -0.400 ** < 0.01 -0.507** < 0.01 -0.666** < 0.05
BMS_PoA (positive affect) -0.407 ** < 0.01 -0.695** < 0.01 -0.675** < 0.01
BMS_NeA (negative affect) 0.672 ** < 0.01 0.681** < 0.01 0.672** < 0.01
BMS_D_Tr (spirit_tranquility) -0.342 * < 0.05 -0.460** < 0.01 -0.499** < 0.01
BMS_D_Dis (spirit_disorientation) 0.346 ** < 0.01 0.673** < 0.01 0.415** <
0.01
BMS_D_Res (spirit_resilience) -0.070 > 0.05 -0.242 > 0.05 -0.323* <
0.05
References