Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Customer in Business
SUBMITTED BY
ANIL KUMAR
Submitted to
VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY,
BELAGAVI
INTERNAL GUIDE
NMIT, Bengaluru
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that Mr. RANJITH being USN 23214, is a bonafide student of Master of
Business Administration, 2nd semester NMIT, Bengaluru, affiliated to Visvesvaraya
Technological University, Belagavi. Seminar report on “Contribution of Infosys
Foundation towards Society as Corporate Social Responsibility” is prepared by him
under the guidance of Dr. Eti Khatri in partial fulfilment of requirement for the award of
the degree of Master of business administration.
1
Dr. Eti Khatri Dr. S Harish Babu Dr.H.C.Nagaraj
Internal Guide HOD – MBA Principal
CONTENT
1 INTRODUCTION 3
5 REFERENCE 9
2
Introduction
Indian Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSME) sector has emerged as a highly vibrant and
dynamic sector of the Indian economy over the last five decades. SMEs not only play crucial role in
providing large employment opportunities at comparatively lower capital cost than large industries but
also help in industrialization of rural areas. MSMEs are complementary to large industries as ancillary
units and this sector contributes enormously to the socio-economic development of the country. The
Sector consisting of 36 million units, as of today, provides employment to over 80 million persons. The
Sector through more than 6,000 products contributes about 8% to GDP besides 45% to the total
manufacturing output and 40% to the exports from the country. The MSME sector has the potential to
spread industrial growth across the country and can be a major partner in the process of inclusive growth.
MSMEs also play a significant role in Nation development through high contribution to Domestic
Production, Significant Export Earnings, Low Investment Requirements, Operational Flexibility,
Location Wise Mobility, Low Intensive Imports, Capacities to Develop Appropriate Indigenous
Technology, Import Substitution, Contribution towards Defence Production, Technology – Oriented
Industries, Competitiveness in Domestic and Export Markets thereby generating new entrepreneurs by
providing knowledge and training.
Despite their high enthusiasm and inherent capabilities to grow, MSMEs in India are also facing a number
of problems like sub-optimal scale of operation, technological obsolescence, supply chain inefficiencies,
increasing domestic & global competition, working capital shortages, not getting trade receivables from
large and multinational companies on time, insufficient skilled manpower, change in manufacturing
strategies and turbulent and uncertain market scenario. To survive with such issues and compete with
large and global enterprises, SMEs need to adopt innovative approaches in their operations. MSMEs that
are innovative, inventive, international in their business outlook, have a strong technological base,
competitive spirit and a willingness to restructure themselves can withstand the present challenges and
come out successfully to contribute 22% to GDP. Indian MSMEs are always ready to accept and acquire
new technologies, new business ideas and automation in industrial and allied sectors.
3
Definition of MSMEs in India
(As Per Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Development (MSMED) Act, 2006)
Small Enterprises above Rs. 25 Lakh & upto Rs. 5 Crore above $ 62,500 & upto $ 1.25 million
Medium Enterprises above Rs. 5 Crore & upto Rs. 10 Crore above $ 1.25 million & upto $ 2.5 million
Small Enterprises above Rs. 10 Lakh & upto Rs. 2 Crore above $ 25,000 & upto $ 0.5 million
Medium Enterprises above Rs. 2 Crore & upto Rs. 5 Crore above $ 0.5 million & upto $ 1.5 million
India has been the breeding ground for ideas and entrepreneurs in the recent past. Start-up activity is at an
all-time high. Start-ups have mushroomed across markets and industries, despite all the murkiness and
uncertainty in the policy framework.
It is interesting to note that even if 2 per cent of Indians turn entrepreneurs and employ 25 people each on
an average, half the Indian population will be employed.
While we see a positive trend in the start-up space in India, there are still challenges that act as roadblocks
to their growth. The government has been focusing on the start-ups keenly. There have been numerous
policies and initiatives focusing on them that have been announced in the recent past, aimed at supporting
new ventures at different stages of their growth.
While it has been a great beginning, there is more that needs to be done to make India start-up friendly.
Lack of existence of a robust ecosystem 4 that can act as a catalyst for the growth of a start-up is another
challenge that is faced by the start-up community. There is a need for more incubators. The infrastructure
support can be improved upon, as it will go a long way in enabling
Classification of the MSMEs in India
Indian MSMEs comprise three sub-sectors:
1. Predominantly rural based, traditional household industries
2. Small and medium industries, functioning with relatively obsolete technologies
3. Modern small and medium enterprises, which are owned and operated by techno-entrepreneurs,
operating in new industries such as software and bio-technology, among others.
6
Best practice policies
The report ends with lessons from policies undertaken in five areas:
1. Financing
The primary role of the public sector in supporting venture capital is to reduce the risk and cost
of private equity finance, complementing and encouraging the development of the private capital
industry. There is major variation across OECD countries in the use of funding methods for SMEs, but
the provision of equity financing to start-up companies is more advanced in the United States and Canada
than elsewhere. Taxation should not impose a disproportionately heavy burden on SMEs.
2. The business environment
This can be improved by systematic and careful scrutiny of new regulations and by implementation of a
business impact system to ensure the audit and monitoring of new legislation. Canada, the United
Kingdom and the Netherlands have successfully introduced procedures to that end. The use of
information technologies provides opportunities for reducing
bureaucratic burdens on all companies, including SMEs.
3. Technology
Technology diffusion programmes should: ensure quality control; promote customer orientation;
upgrade the innovative capacity of firms -- including the promotion of general awareness of the value of
innovation among management -- and stimulate demand for technical and organisational change; build on
existing inter-relationships in national innovation systems and provide greater coherence between
programme design (e.g. targets, objectives, modes of support) and service delivery; build on evaluation
and assessment. Technology diffusion programmes should in particular have mechanisms for assessment
which can guide and improve their operation and management on a continuing basis. The United States
has programmes effectively stimulating quality in diffusion processes, while Germany has sophisticated
institutional set-up catalysing interactions between existing actors in the national innovation system.
4. Management capabilities
Governments have sought to enhance the “quality” of owner/managers of SMEs either by encouraging
training and/or by providing access to advisory and consultancy services. The most extensive assistance is
provided by Japan which has both a highly developed system of advisory services and SME colleges. The
United Kingdom and Italy have also implemented interesting schemes. Subsidy-schemes aimed at
enhancing the skill base of SMEs should take the following into consideration: specification of
objectives; situation after the removal of the subsidy; collecting information from SMEs themselves.
Measures to encourage information networks must seek to customise databases and avoid information
overload. Four approaches have been developed to address these issues: know your customer; access;
explicitly avoid interference with market mechanisms; and subsidisation of information.
7
5. Access to markets
Measures to ease access to markets have focused on international markets, on the one hand, and public
procurement, on the other. Japan has the most developed policy and institutional set-up for the former,
based upon the use of non-discriminatory measures which seek to support efforts made by SMEs
themselves. Policy in this area seeks to tackle the disadvantages experienced by SMEs due to their lack of
access to human resources, to external markets and to technology. Regarding public procurement, the
United States, and other OECD countries such as Australia, have made comprehensive efforts to increase
the “share” which small firms obtain of government contracts.
The successes
A limited number of so-called high-growth MSMEs make important contributions to job creation and
productive growth of economy. At the earlier stages, management capabilities are crucial to survival. As
the firm matures, human resource and innovation strategies increase in importance. By the time the firm
has become established, innovation is crucial for growth. The fastest growing entrants are those that
translate strategy into action in the form of R&D, innovation and training, put great emphasis on hiring
skilled employees and motivating employees, and balances the enhancement of their capabilities in
different areas -- the last being particularly important in high-knowledge sectors.
Women-owned SMEs are growing at a faster rate than the economy as a whole in several OECD
countries, allowing capitalisation of the skills of educated and trained women who might otherwise be
blocked in corporate advancement because of the “glass ceiling”. The increased flexibility inherent in
owning one’s business allows women to contribute to the income of their families while balancing work
and family responsibilities. However, the economic potential of women entrepreneurs remains partly
untapped; measures are required to improve information and statistics in this field, as well as to
strengthen the preconditions for financing, networks and technology. Entrepreneurship tends to vary
markedly across regions.
An increasing number of regions are known for generating clusters of dynamic firms which benefit from
“information spill-over” and other intangible factors. Regional development policies have been
introduced to assist regions suffering from declining industries. The primary policy tools for attracting
firms to disadvantaged regions are investment in infrastructure, social assistance, training and other forms
of public assistance. The regional dimension of entrepreneurship is not limited to clusters of enterprises
but also includes micro enterprises. Programmes to assist the creation and development of micro
enterprises in inner cities and remote rural areas have become widespread policy tools. Governments
wishing to adopt policies used successfully in other regions or countries should take the regional context
into account.
8
Conclusion
REFERENCES:
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Finance in India-A research study on need ,gap and way forward by
IFC
http://ssrn.com http://ssrn.com/ Prof. B.B Kar .Prof. R.N Subudhi MSME Growth Dilemma : Create More
or Reduce Mortality ? A Research Study on Needs, Gaps and Way Forward http://ssrn.com/ Kenny Bell
and Ed Vos SME Capital Structure: The Dominance of Demand Factors
http://ssrn.com Aakriti Goel Indian Institute of Management Bannerghetta Road Bangalore Challenges In
Micro Small And Medium Enterprises