Govt.

Post Graduate College

Mirpur
Assignment of History of English Literature-I (Repeater)

Submitted By:
Malik Faraz Subhani
Class:
BS ENG-VI(Repeater)
Roll NO.
14
Subject:
History of Eng-Literature-I
Topic:
General Introduction and main genre of
Middle Ages
Submitted To:
Mam. Uzma Farooq

Introduction of the Age:

The Middle English period sees a huge transition in the language, culture, and lifestyle of
England and results in what we can recognize today as a form of “modern” (recognizable)
English. The era extends to around 1500. As with the Old English period, much of the Middle
English writings were religious in nature; however, from about 1350 onward, secular literature
began to rise. This period is home to the likes of Chaucer, Thomas Malory, and Robert
Henryson. Notable works include "Piers Plowman" and "Sir Gawain and the Green Knight." 
The Normans, who were residing in Normandy (France) defeated the Anglo-Saxon King at
the Battle of Hastings (1066) and conquered England.
The Norman Conquest inaugurated a distinctly new epoch in the literary as well as political
history of England. The Anglo-Saxon authors were then as suddenly and permanently displaced
as the Anglo-Saxon king.
The literature afterwards read and written by Englishmen was thereby as completely transformed
as the sentiments and tastes of English rulers. The foreign types of literature introduced after the
Norman Conquest first found favour with the monarchs and courtiers, and were deliberately
fostered by them, to the disregard of native forms. No effective protest was possible by the
Anglo-Saxons, and English thought for centuries to come was largely fashioned in the manner of
the French. Throughout the whole period, which we call the Middle English period (as belonging
to the Middle Ages or Medieval times in the History of Britain) or the Anglo-Norman period, in
forms of artistic expression as well as of religious service, the English openly acknowledged a
Latin control.

It is true that before the Norman Conquest the Anglo-Saxons had a body of native literature
distinctly superior to any European vernacular. But one cannot deny that the Normans came to
their land when they greatly needed an external stimulus. The Conquest effected a wholesome
awakening of national life. The people were suddenly inspired by a new vision of a greater
future. They became united in a common hope. In course of time the Anglo-Saxons lost their
initial hostility to the new comers, and all became part and parcel of one nation.
The Normans not only brought with them soldiers and artisans and traders, they also imported
scholars to revive knowledge, chroniclers to record memorable events, minstrels to celebrate
victories, or sing of adventure and love.
The great difference between the two periods—Anglo-Saxon period and Anglo-Norman
period, is marked by the disappearance of the old English poetry. There is nothing during the
Anglo-Norman period like Beowulf or Fall of the Angels. The later religious poetry has little in it
to recall the finished art of Cynewulf. Anglo-Saxon poetry, whether derived from heathendom or
from the Church, has ideas and manners of its own; it comes to perfection, and then it dies away.
It seems that Anglo-Saxon poetry grows to rich maturity, and then disappears, as with the new
forms of language and under new influences, the poetical education started again, and so the
poetry of the Anglo-Norman period has nothing in common the Anglo-Saxon poetry.
The most obvious change in literary expression appears in the vehicle employed. For
centuries Latin had been more or less spoken or written by the clergy in England. The Conquest
which led to the reinvigoration of the monasteries and the tightening of the ties with Rome,
determined its more extensive use. Still more important, as a result of foreign sentiment in court
and castle, it caused writings in the English vernacular to be disregarded, and established French
as the natural speech of the cultivated and the high-born. The clergy insisted on the use of Latin,
the nobility on the use of French; no one of influence saw the utility of English as a means of
perpetuating thought, and for nearly three centuries very few works appeared in the native
tongue.
In spite of the English language having been thrown into the background, some works were
composed in it, though they echoed in the main the sentiments and tastes of the French writers,
as French then was the supreme arbiter of European literary style. Another striking characteristic
of medieval literature is its general anonymity. Of the many who wrote the names of but few are
recorded, and of the history of these few we have only the most meagre details. It was because
originality was deplored as a fault, and independence of treatment was a heinous offence in their
eyes.

 Impact of Norman conquest:

Anglo Norman period is also known as Age of transition between old English or middle English
.After the conquest the Norman imported French literary ideal and French culture into England
.In Norman court Latin and French were only recognized and honored language due to which
the English language was ignored and English literature remained silent for a long time ,But
when the English literature re-appeared
After a century ,it was found significantly influenced by French literature but after the next two
centuries, the cultivation of romances greatly enriched and expanded English literature under the
French literary influence.
The impact of the Norman conquest to the expansion of English literature and culture were seen
in other following ways too-
Firstly, by the direct cultural and literary influence by Rome which the Norman had brought.
Secondly, as a result of the contact with the reputed scholars of Europe,there was the immense
enlargement of learning and scholarship.
Thirdly, literary themes and expression of France themes and mode of expression again,the
Norman inspired England with the ideal of a strong ,National, centralised government.
(a)  The Romances:
The most popular form of literature during the Middle English period was the
romances. No literary productions of the Middle Ages are so characteristic, none so
perennially attractive as those that treat romantically of heroes and heroines of by-gone
days. These romances are notable for their stories rather than their poetry, and they, like
the drama afterwards, furnished the chief mental recreation of time for the great body of
the people. These romances were mostly borrowed from Latin and French sources. They
deal with the stories of King Arthur, The War of Troy, the mythical doings of
Charlemagne and of Alexander the Great.
(b)  The Miracle and Morality Plays:
In the Middle English period Miracle plays became very popular. From the growth and
development of the Bible story, scene by scene, carried to its logical conclusion, this drama—
developed to an enormous cycle of sacred history, beginning with the creation of man, his fall
and banishment from the Garden of Eden and extending through the more important matters of
the Old Testament and life of Christ in the New to the summoning of the quick and the dead on
the day of final judgment. This kind of drama is called the miracle play—sometimes less
correctly the mystery play—and it flourished throughout England from the reign of Henry II to
that of Elizabeth (1154-1603).
Another form of drama which flourished during the Middle Ages was the Morality plays. In
these plays the uniform theme is the struggle between the powers of good and evil for the
mastery of the soul of man. The personages were abstract virtues, or vices, each acting and
speaking in accordance with his name; and the plot was built upon their contrasts and influences
on human nature, with the intent to teach right living and uphold religion. In a word, allegory is
the distinguishing mark of the moral plays. In these moral plays the protagonist is always an
abstraction; he is Mankind, the Human Race, the Pride of Life, and there is an attempt to
compass the whole scope of man’s experience and temptations in life, as there had been a
corresponding effort in the Miracle plays to embrace the complete range of sacred history, the
life of Christ, and the redemption of the world.
(c)  William Langland (1332)
One of the greatest poets of the Middle Ages was William Langland, and his poem, A Vision
of Piers the Plowman holds an important place in English literature. In spite of its archaic style,
it is a classic work in English literature. This poem, which is a satire on the corrupt religious
practices, throws light on the ethical problems of the day. The character assumed by Langland is
that of the prophet, denouncing the sins of society and encouraging men to aspire to a higher life.
He represents the dissatisfaction of the lower and the more thinking classes of English society, as
Chaucer represents the content of the aristocracy and the prosperous middle class. Although
Langland is essentially a satiric poet, he has decided views on political and social questions. The
feudal system is his ideal; he desires no change in the institution of his days, and he thinks that
all would be well if the different orders of society would do their duty. Like Dante and Bunyan,
he ennobles his satire by arraying it in a garb of allegory; and he is intensely real.
(d)  John Gower (1325?—1408)
Gower occupies an important place in the development of English poetry. Though it was
Chaucer who played the most important role in this direction, Gower’s contribution cannot be
ignored. Gower represents the English culmination of that courtly medieval poetry which had its
rise in France two or three hundred years before. He is a great stylist, and he proved that English
might compete with the other languages which had most distinguished themselves in poetry.
Gower is mainly a narrative poet and his most important work is Confession Amantis, which is in
the form of conversation between the poet and a divine interpreter. It is an encyclopaedia of the
art of love, and satirises the vanities of the current time. Throughout the collection of stories
which forms the major portion of Confession Amantis, Gower presents himself as a moralist.
Though Gower was inferior to Chaucer, it is sufficient that they were certainly fellow pioneers,
fellow schoolmasters, in the task of bringing England to literature. Up to their time, the literary
production of England had been exceedingly rudimentary and limited. Gower, like Chaucer,
performed the function of establishing the form of English as a thoroughly equipped medium of
literature.
(e)  Chaucer (1340?…1400)
It was, in fact, Chaucer who was the real founder of English poetry, and he is rightly called
the ‘Father of English Poetry’. Unlike the poetry of his predecessors and contemporaries, which
is read by few except professed scholars, Chaucer’s poetry has been read and enjoyed
continuously from his own day to this, and the greatest of his successors, from Spenser and
Milton to Tennyson and William Morris, have joined in praising it. Chaucer, in fact, made a
fresh beginning in English literature. He disregarded altogether the old English tradition. His
education as a poet was two-fold. Part of it came from French and Italian literatures, but part of it
came from life. He was not a mere bookman, nor was he in the least a visionary. Like
Shakespeare and Milton, he was, on the contrary, a man of the world and of affairs.
The most famous and characteristic work of Chaucer is the Canterbury Tales, which is a
collection of stories related by the pilgrims on their way to the shrine of Thomas Becket at
Canterbury. These pilgrims represent different sections of contemporary English society, and in
the description of the most prominent of these people in the Prologue Chaucer’s powers are
shown at their very highest. All these characters are individualized, yet their thoroughly typical
quality gives unique value to Chaucer’s picture of men and manners in the England of his time.
The Canterbury Tales  is a landmark in the history of English poetry because here Chaucer
enriched the English language and metre to such an extent, that now it could be conveniently
used for any purpose. Moreover, by introducing a variety of highly-finished characters into a
single action, and engaging them in an animated dialogue, Chaucer fulfilled every requirement of
the dramatist, short of bringing his plays on the stage. Also, by drawing finished and various
portraits in verse, he showed the way to the novelists to portray characters.
Chaucer’s works fall into three periods. During the first period he imitated French models,
particularly the famous and very long poem Le Roman de la Rose  of which he made a translation
—Romaunt of the Rose.  This poem which gives an intimate introduction to the medieval French
romances and allegories of courtly love, is the embryo out of which all Chaucer’s poetry grows.
During this period he also wrote the Book of the Duchess, an elegy, which in its form and nature
is like the Romaunt of the Rose; Complaint unto Pity, a shorter poem and ABC, a series of
stanzas religious in tone, in which each opens with a letter of the alphabet in order.
The poems of the second period (1373-84) show the influence of Italian literature, especially
of Dante’s Divine Comedy  and Boccaccio’s poems. In this period he wrote The Parliament of
Fowls, which contains very dramatic and satiric dialogues between the assembled birds; Troilus
and Criseyde, which narrates the story of the Trojan prince Troilus and his love for a damsel,
Creseida; The Story of Griselda, in which is given a pitiful picture of womanhood; and The
House of Fame, which is a masterpiece of comic fantasy, with a graver undertone of
contemplation of human folly.
Chaucer’s third period (1384-90) may be called the English period, because in it he threw
off foreign influences and showed native originality. In the Legend of Good Woman he
employed for the first time the heroic couplet. It was during this period that he wrote The
Canterbury Tales, his greatest poetic achievement, which places us in the heart of London. Here
we find his gentle, kindly humour, which is Chaucer’s greatest quality, at its very best.
Chaucer’s importance in the development of English literature is very great because he
removed poetry from the region of Metaphysics and Theology, and made it hold as “twere the
mirror up to nature”. He thus brought back the old classical principle of the direct imitation of
nature.
(f)  Chaucer’s Successors
After Chaucer there was a decline in English poetry for about one hundred years. The years
from 1400 to the Renaissance were a period bereft of literature. There were only a few minor
poets, the imitators and successors of Chaucer, who are called the English and Scottish
Chaucerians who wrote during this period. The main cause of the decline of literature during this
period was that no writer of genius was born during those long years. Chaucer’s successors were
Occieeve, Lydgate, Hawes, Skelton Henryson, Dunbar and Douglas. They all did little but copy
him, and they represent on era of mediocrity in English literature that continues up to the time of
the Renaissance.