Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
Fluoroacrylate-Styrene Copolymer
Jianhang Xu, Aaron Wlaschin, and Robert M. Enick, SPE, U. of Pittsburgh
erning expression for a falling cylinder viscometer under these when comparing neat CO2 to thickened CO2. Under these constraints
conditions is provided in Eq. 2. for a Newtonian fluid, the ratio of the viscosity of thickened CO2 to
the viscosity of neat CO2 was equal to the ratio of the terminal
共c − f兲 velocity in neat CO2 to the terminal velocity in thickened CO2.
=C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (2)
Vc
copolymer solution Vc,CO2
The viscometer constant, C, can be theoretically determined = . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3)
CO2 Vc,copolymer solution
from the viscometer geometry15,16 or experimentally determined
by calibrating the viscometer with neat CO2. The disparity be- The viscosity of the CO2-copolymer solutions was also mod-
tween these values increased with decreasing cylinder diameter eled using a power law expression, providing a more accurate
and increasing gap width (Table 1). The narrower cylinders were representation of the non-Newtonian nature of the solution. (Note
also prone to wobbling and rotation during their fall. Therefore it that if non-Newtonian fluid approaches the Newtonian behavior, n
should be emphasized that the primary utility of falling cylinder approaches unity as m approaches .)
冏冏
viscometry is the rapid detection of significant increases in vis- n−1
cosity. The density of CO2 was estimated with a precise equation dVz dVz dVz
of state derived solely for carbon dioxide.17 The density of the = −m = − . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (4)
dr dr dr
thickened carbon dioxide was assumed to be comparable to the
density of neat carbon dioxide because the concentration of the The relative increase in the viscosity of carbon dioxide exhib-
copolymer was relatively low, and the same cylinder was used ited by the non-Newtonian copolymer solution was defined as the
following ratio18:
copolymer solution
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5)
CO2
Fig. 6—Temperature effect on copolymer-CO2 solution relative Fig. 7—Relative viscosity increase vs. concentration at 298 K,
viscosity increase, 34 MPa, falling cylinder viscometry. 20 MPa, flow through ∼100 md Berea sandstone.