Sie sind auf Seite 1von 6

Aquatic Botany 88 (2008) 121–126

www.elsevier.com/locate/aquabot

The effect of different submerged macrophyte species and biomass


on sediment resuspension in a shallow freshwater lake
En-Hua Li a,b, Wei Li a,*, Gui-Hua Liu a, Long-Yi Yuan a,b
a
Laboratory of Aquatic Plant Biology, Wuhan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, China
b
Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100039, China
Received 9 August 2006; received in revised form 11 June 2007; accepted 3 September 2007
Available online 7 September 2007

Abstract
Our study aim was to elucidate the effects of different species of submerged macrophytes and biomass levels on sediment resuspension. For this
purpose experiments were conducted in four different enclosures (Potamogeton maackianus enclosure-PE, Vallisneria spinulosa enclosure-VE,
manipulated enclosure-ME and aquaculture enclosure-AE). A sediment trap method was employed and the experiments were conducted from
summer to winter in a shallow freshwater lake located in central China. A total of 813, 1277, 613 and 693 g DW m2 of sediment was resuspended
in VE, AE, ME and PE, respectively. Our results showed that P. maackianus was more effective than V. spinulosa in restraining sediment
resuspension. Macrophytes reached their maximum effectiveness of reducing resuspension at a certain species-specific biomass threshold above
which biomass effects on resuspension were negligible. The threshold biomass was estimated as 300 g m2 for P. maackianus. Accordingly, within
a lake management and aquaculture aspect, we conclude that as long as biomass does not fall below this threshold its consumption will not
influence sediment resuspension. In the mid-lower reaches of the Yangtze River macrophyte coverage protects the lake sediment against adverse
effects of monsoon wind; if the vegetation is eroded aquaculture sediment resuspension increases significantly.
# 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Macrophyte; Biomass; Sediment resuspension; Sediment trap; Freshwater lake; Aquaculture

1. Introduction sion would exceed 20 times that of external loading during the
open water season (Krogerus and Ekholm, 2003). Fish feeding
Shallow lakes are strongly influenced by sediment behavior in the bottom can also contribute to sediment
resuspension which has long been recognized as an important resuspension (Zambrano et al., 2001). In fact, all processes
internal physical process affecting many ecological aspects of resulting in or strengthening the water movement at the
lakes (Bloesch, 1994; Madsen et al., 2001; Pluntke and sediment–water interface will cause resuspension.
Kozerski, 2003). Wind is considered the most important factor Submerged macrophytes can reduce current and wave
promoting sediment resuspension through wave action. The energies and shelter the sediment from erosion and resuspen-
entire lake may be affected, implying resuspension of the sion (James et al., 2004). Submerged macrophytes can also
surface layer of sediment (Bengtsson and Hellstrom, 1992). promote sedimentation and serve as effective sediment traps by
This results in an immediate increase in the concentration of intercepting suspended sediment. Therefore, macrophytes play
total suspended solids, total phosphorus (TP) and other an important role in stabilizing the sediment and reducing
parameters within the overlying water column (Newman and turbidity in the shallow lake ecosystems (Barko and James,
Reddy, 1992). The internal phosphorus (P) loading induced by 1998; Madsen et al., 2001; Kufel and Kufel, 2002; Pluntke and
resuspension may reach rates 20–30 times higher than those Kozerski, 2003).
released from undisturbed sediment (Søndergaard et al., 1992), Although a macrophyte-dominated lake may remain in a
and the potentially available P induced by sediment resuspen- clear state via stabilizing mechanisms (Scheffer, 1998), effects
of submerged macrophytes on sediment resuspension have so
far only been poorly studied (Horppila and Nurminen, 2003).
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 27 87510140; fax: +86 27 87510251. As the architecture and distribution of plant tissue over the
E-mail addresses: liwei@rose.whiob.ac.cn, lapb@public.wh.hb.cn (W. Li). water column vary substantially among species and growth

0304-3770/$ – see front matter # 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.aquabot.2007.09.001
122 E.-H. Li et al. / Aquatic Botany 88 (2008) 121–126

forms, the effects of submerged macrophytes on the hydro- maximum depths of the lake were 1.94 and 4.1 m, respectively.
dynamics and, consequently, on sediment resuspension also The dominant wind direction in the area was north to northwest
differ between plant stands (Vermaat et al., 2000). Though in winter and south to southwest in summer. In summertime,
James et al. (2004) found that a much higher shear stress was total nitrogen (TN) and TP concentrations in the water column
required to resuspend sediments when high biomass sheltered were 522–2405 and 15–45 mg L1, respectively. The concen-
the sediment surface from wave action, only limited informa- tration of suspended solids (SS) was about 10 mg L1 and
tion is available on the impacts of biomass levels of submerged Secchi depth usually ca. 1.5 m in the open water area. Due to
species on sediment resuspension. the lake’s relatively clear water and its large stand of submerged
Before the 1990s aquatic macrophytes were once the main macrophytes, large-scale production of crab and grass carp has
primary producers in most lakes of the mid-lower reaches of the taken place since 1991. At the end of 2003, aquaculture
Yangtze River. However, because of anthropogenic effects, an enclosures were established in a large area of the lake, and
increasing number of lakes have become turbid with a resultant vegetation has almost entirely disappeared (Peng et al., 2003).
decline in or loss of macrophytes. In fact, lake management in
the district is facing a constant dilemma. The lakes will rapidly 2.2. Data collection
turn into swamps or even land if strong control of the rapid
development of macrophytes is not performed, but will turn Three enclosures (30 m  30 m each) were constructed
turbid if macrophytes are over-exploited and replaced by from bamboo poles and fish nets. Two hosted mono-dominant
phytoplankton (Li et al., 2002). How to balance macrophyte macrophyte stands: Potamogeton maackianus (PE) and
conservation and exploitation is a central question in lake Vallisneria spinulosa (VE), while one enclosure was manipu-
management. We hope that our study on the effects of lated (ME). ME was dominated by P. maackianus, which was,
macrophytes on sediment resuspension will allow us to offer however, removed with iron rakes. The mesh size of the fish net
some suggestions. was 3 cm2 in order to prevent crab and grass carp from entering
We undertook a 7-month study to reveal the effects of the enclosure. The top of the net was placed above the water
different species of submerged macrophyte and levels of surface and the net foot was deeply embedded into the
biomass on sediment resuspension. Our aims were threefold: sediment. A P. maackianus stand located in the central of a
first, what are the effects of the monsoon on sediment large aquaculture enclosure was chosen as the forth enclosure
resuspension in lakes of the mid-lower reaches of the Yangtze (AE). Here, plants were almost depleted by grass carps and
River. The monsoon obviously affects the water level as do the crabs, and the stand was not enclosed in order to maintain the
seasonally determined changes in wind direction. Second, what very low plant biomass level (see Table 1 for details).
are the effects of different species and biomasses of submerged The study was initiated on 15 June 2003. Five sediment traps
macrophytes on sediment resuspension? Can an appropriate were placed randomly in each enclosure. The traps were
biomass of aquatic macrophytes be inferred for sustainable constructed of PVC pipe with an inside diameter of 7 cm. The
utilization of lake? Third, what are the effects of freshwater height of each trap was 37 cm, the height:width ratio thus being
aquaculture on lakes? Fish is an important protein source for the >5 (Evans, 1994). The bottom of the trap was closed and
Chinese population, and since the 1990s China has had the weighed down with a brick. The upper end was tied with a
world’s highest freshwater aquaculture output. However, little nylon rope to a pole placed in the sediment, and the trap was
information is available about the environmental consequences accordingly vertically suspended in the water. The trap bottom
of this large-scale aquaculture on the environmental state of the was 10 cm above the sediment surface and did therefore not
lakes, although its destructive effects on aquatic macrophytes affect the sediment resuspension process (Bloesch, 1994).
are well known. Samples were collected every month. In each enclosure,
three replicate water samples were taken collected for analysis
2. Materials and methods of suspended solids (SS) (filtered through Whatman GF/C,
dried at 105 8C to constant weight). The mean vegetation
2.1. Study area biomass was determined by collecting the macrophytes 10
times randomly using a 20 cm  20 cm clamp in each
The study was conducted in Lake Xiliang with an area enclosure. After collection, the macrophytes were rinsed and
of 72 km2, situated in the middle reaches of the Yangtze oven-dried at 80 8C to constant weight. Three replicate 5 cm
River (298510 –308020 N, 1148000 –1148100 E). The mean and top sediment cores were collected, air-dried and ground for
Table 1
The name, dominant species, location and distance to the lake shore of the four enclosures
Enclosure name Dominant species Inferior species Location Distance to
lake shore (m)
Vallisneria spinulosa enclosure (VE) V. spinulosa Potamogeton maackianus 298350 1600 N, 1148040 2300 E 500
Aquaculture enclosure (AE) P. maackianus V. spinulosa, Myriophyllum spicatum 298350 0200 N, 1148040 0800 E 1000
P. maackianus enclosure (PE) P. maackianus 298340 5200 N, 1148030 5300 E 1500
Manipulated enclosure (ME) P. maackianus 298340 5200 N, 1148030 5200 E 1500
E.-H. Li et al. / Aquatic Botany 88 (2008) 121–126 123

organic content analysis (Bengtsson and Hellstrom, 1992). The wavelengths within different enclosures were compared with
contents of the traps were also filtered through Whatman GF/C, ANCOVA by using the water depth from each enclosure as
dried at 105 8C and weighed as gross sedimentation. The covariates. Analysis of covariance was also performed to
organic fractions of surface sediment, entrapped material and compare the rate of sediment resuspension in the four
suspended seston (SS) were calculated from the residue of a enclosures by using water depth, average and maximum
sample ignited at 550 8C for 4 h (Bloesch, 1994). wavelengths for each enclosure as covariates (Horppila and
Nurminen, 2005). All data analyses were performed in SPSS
2.3. Rate of sediment resuspension calculation for Windows.

The rate of sediment resuspension was estimated using the 3. Results


method developed by Gasith (1975) for shallow water bodies
with assumption that the organic content of the bottom 3.1. Wind effects
sediment differs from that of SS. The method uses the
equation: The mean wind velocity was 2.5 m s1 during the study
period, and the maximum wind velocity only occasionally
fS  fT
R¼S ; exceeded 5 m s1 (Fig. 1). Although the maximum wavelength
fR  fT from June to October occasionally reached or exceeded the
where R is the resuspended bottom sediment, S the entrapped water depth, increased wave activity affected the sediments at
material, f S the organic fraction of S, f R the organic fraction of the time of declining water depths from November to January
surface sediment, and f T is the organic fraction of SS. The (Fig. 2). Both maximum and average wavelength in AE were
values of gross sedimentation rate were corrected by subtract- similar to those in PE and ME, which were significantly higher
ing the dry weight of suspended matter contained by the water than those in VE ( p < 0.05, ANCOVA).
volume from the gross dry weight in each trap.

2.4. Wind velocity and wavelength

Resuspension occurs when deep water waves enter water


shallower than one-half of the wavelength (Evans, 1994). To
study the role of wind velocity and wavelength in the rate of
sediment resuspension, the relationship between wavelength
and resuspension rate was explored. The theoretical wave-
lengths were calculated using the equations presented by
Carper and Bachmann (1984): Fig. 1. Maximal and average wind velocity (m s1) in Lake Xiliang, central
China, during the study period.
gT 2
L¼ ;
2p
where L is the wavelength (m), g the gravitational constant and
T is the wave period (s). The value of T is given by
  0:25 
gT gF
¼ 1:20 tanh 0:077 ;
2pU U2
where U is the wind velocity (m s1) and F is the effective fetch
(m). The effective fetch for each wind direction was calculated
according to Carper and Bachmann (1984):
P
xi cos li
F¼ ;
13:5
where xi is the distance from the sampling enclosure to land for
every deviation angle li (up 428). Wind velocity and direction
data were obtained from the Weather Station of Jiayu County
situated 20 km west of the lake.

2.5. Data analyses

The values of f R were compared with those of f T for each Fig. 2. Water depth, one-half of the maximal and average wavelength (cm) in
enclosure using Paired-sample t-test. Average and maximum different enclosures during the study period in Lake Xiliang, central China.
124 E.-H. Li et al. / Aquatic Botany 88 (2008) 121–126

Fig. 3. Biomass (g DW m2) of macrophytes in different enclosures in Lake


Xiliang, central China, during the study period (mean  S.E., N = 10).
Fig. 4. The average daily rate (mean  S.E., N = 5) of sediment resuspension
3.2. Vegetation changes (g DW m2 day1) in different enclosures of Lake Xiliang, central China.

The four enclosures showed different macrophyte composi- 4. Discussion


tions and biomass changes (Table 1, Fig. 3), biomass being
highest in PE and lowest in AE ( p < 0.001, ANOVA). In AE 4.1. Wind effects
and ME biomasses exhibited quite rapid changes, while the
biomasses of PE and VE were relatively stable or increased Wind is considered the most important factor affecting the
only slowly. resuspension process in shallow lakes (Bengtsson and
Hellstrom, 1992; Madsen et al., 2001). Although the recorded
3.3. Resuspension rates wind was not particularly high during the study period (Fig. 1),
it still disturbed the sediments and resuspension occurred
In each enclosure, the value of f T was significantly higher frequently rather than occasionally. However, the resuspension
than that of f R ( p < 0.001) (Table 2), suggesting that the rates were substantially lower than those recorded in other
resuspension rate is reliably calculated using the Gasith method lakes, even in the aquaculture enclosure (Kristensen et al.,
(1975). 1992; Madsen et al., 2001; Horppila and Nurminen, 2003). The
The rate of sediment resuspension (R) rose in the first few low resuspension rates may owe to three factors. First, the U-
months and then declined gradually in winter in the VE, PE shaped lake morphology shortened the wind fetch, and the
and ME enclosures, while in AE it increased and peaked at relatively higher water level in summertime (June to October)
8 g DW m2 day1 in December. R differed significantly prevented wave effects on the sediment. Second, the dense
among the enclosures (d.f. = 3, F = 9.970, p = 0.001). Thus, R macrophyte vegetation shielded the sediment from resuspen-
was significantly higher in AE than in the other enclosures sion (James et al., 2004), and, third, thickly dotted aquaculture
(P < 0.05), R in PE being significantly lower than that in VE fish pens decreased wind energies.
( p = 0.022). No significant difference was found between VE In wintertime, at declining water levels, sediment resuspen-
and ME or between PE and ME ( p > 0.05, ANCOVA) sion increased in AE in December. However, in the three
(Fig. 4). macrophyte enclosures, the percentage of the water column

Table 2
The organic fraction (%, mean  S.D.) of entrapped material ( fS), suspended seston ( fT), and surface sediment ( fR) in different enclosures during the study period in
Lake Xiliang, central China
July August September October November December January
VE
fS 27.14  1.23 31.50  1.09 29.54  0.38 30.14  0.42 31.30  1.17 28.49   1.19 32.80  0.14
fT 77.49  2.58 83.31  4.97 86.86  2.49 81.26  1.53 79.64  1.91 83.55  5.33 70.20  4.27
fR 11.02  0.69 12.06  1.55 11.65  0.78 12.13  0.96 13.01  1.37 16.60  1.81 17.42  0.54
AE
fS 27.51  3.16 34.77  1.07 25.25  0.22 27.76  0.68 26.43  1.08 33.62  0.71 31.05  4.04
fT 70.60  1.14 71.91  1.96 68.88  0.64 68.93  4.33 66.53  3.53 66.99  2.08 69.33  3.55
fR 11.00  1.45 10.34  0.49 10.75  0.59 12.08  0.51 11.83  0.90 14.54  0.54 15.07  0.88
PE
fS 31.58  1.08 30.13  0.32 31.71  0.94 30.55  0.60 35.54  0.51 30.11  0.74 33.96  1.16
fT 83.27  2.99 87.37  1.11 85.59  3.81 83.90  2.38 82.66  2.40 82.21  2.05 78.07  2.05
fR 13.19  1.73 12.46  0.55 13.67  1.51 12.47  0.43 13.42  0.50 15.73  1.25 14.36  0.25
ME
fS 20.91  1.14 24.99  0.85 36.13  1.15 34.05  0.84 30.94  1.04 35.94  0.61 29.14  1.35
fT 80.84  1.61 82.44  2.08 86.94  2.76 81.51  2.27 80.66  3.98 81.85  2.07 71.73  6.55
fR 10.62  0.80 9.58  0.81 10.96  1.35 9.80  0.58 10.04  0.67 13.40  1.13 10.97  0.28
E.-H. Li et al. / Aquatic Botany 88 (2008) 121–126 125

Fig. 5. The biomass (g m2 DW) and resuspension rate (g DW m2 day1) of
the four enclosures during the study period.
Fig. 6. Comparison of resuspension rate (R) (g DW m2 day1) and biomass
infested by submerged macrophytes rose at declining water (g DW m2) (mean  S.E.) in AE in Lake Xiliang, central China.
depth, enhancing the ability of macrophytes to reduce sediment
resuspension (Madsen et al., 2001), and thus seems to be the PE and ME, respectively. Considering the relatively low
factor responsible for the still decreasing resuspension rates. sedimentation rate and the gradually decreasing temperature
during the study period, the sediment traps were exposed for a
4.2. Macrophytes effects relatively long period (Bloesch and Burns, 1980). However, the
comparatively high water temperatures occurring in the
That R was significantly lower in PE than in VE, combined warmest season may lead to mineralization of the organic
with the stronger wind effects in PE (Figs. 2 and 4), suggests a content of deposited material in the traps and, with it,
species-specific difference in reducing sediment resuspen- underestimation of the grass sedimentation rate. On the other
sion. Thus, P. maackianus seems to have stronger capability hand, the sediment trap method yields higher sedimentation
of restraining sediment resuspension than V. spinulosa. We rates compared with the mass balance method because of the
suggest that the main reason for the observed difference is that decreased water turbulence within the traps (Kozerski, 1994).
P. maackianus can accumulate more biomass than V. Our results show the approximate values of sedimentation and
spinulosa. More biomass seems to entail higher effectiveness resuspension in Lake Xiliang, but, considering the disturbance
of restraining sediment resuspension. A relatively clear of fish feeding activities to the sediment, wind-induced
pattern emerged when all biomass data were pooled and resuspension may be overestimated for the aquaculture
related to R, while ignoring species and other differences enclosure.
(Fig. 5). However, even at similar biomass concentrations, P.
maackianus proved to be more effective at restraining 4.3. Aquaculture effect
sediment resuspension than V. spinulosa. The biomass of P.
maackianus in ME was almost similar to that of V. spinulosa Enclosure culture of herbivorous fishes has proved to be very
in VE during July to September, wind effects being stronger in effective at controlling the fast development of aquatic
ME, however. The insignificant differences in sedimentation macrophytes, which may create in in-fill processes in lakes
rates show that when biomass levels are comparable, V. (Wu, 2001; Gu et al., 2006). However, in shallow lake
spinulosa was less efficient at reducing sediment resuspen- ecosystems it may trigger a shift from one stable state to
sion. This might be the result of a species-specific spatial another, which is unfortunate and a challenge to lake managers
distribution of plant biomass. whose most common response is to limit the fish yield. Our
Although the biomass in PE was significantly larger than in study reveals that even at reduced intensity, aquaculture may
ME, their sediment resuspension rates were similar, suggesting have significant effects on sediment resuspension (Fig. 6).
the occurrence of a critical point of biomass above which However, if the aquatic macrophyte biomass is maintained at
accumulation of more biomass only has little effect on about 300 g m2, the changes in resuspension rates appear
restraining sediment resuspension. In our study, this threshold acceptable.
seemed to be 300 g m2. Even in AE, whose biomass was
below this value, R increased significantly (Fig. 6). However, in Acknowledgements
Lake Christina, USA, a biomass of 200 g m2 (Myriophyllum
sibiricum and Chara canescens) was effective at reducing We thank Dr. Erik Jeppesen and Dr. Stephen C. Maberly
resuspension (Madsen et al., 2001; James et al., 2004). The for their valuable advice during manuscript preparation.
difference in threshold biomass may primarily be determined Three anonymous referees are greatly acknowledged for
by the architecture of the dominant macrophyte species and the their valuable comments. Many thanks to A.M. Poulsen
physical properties of the sediments. The variability of wind for her careful linguistic edit. This study was funded by the
field in relation to the morphometric features of the lake may State Key Basic Research and Development Plan of
also be responsible. China (2002CB412300), the Innovation Key project of
During the study period (212 days), a total of 813, 1277, 613 CAS (KSCX2-1-10) and the Hundred Talents Program
and 693 g DW m2 of sediment was resuspended in VE, AE, of CAS.
126 E.-H. Li et al. / Aquatic Botany 88 (2008) 121–126

References Kozerski, H.P., 1994. Possibilities and limitations of sediment traps to measure
sedimentation and resuspension. Hydrobiologia 284, 93–100.
Barko, J.W., James, W.F., 1998. Effects of submerged macrophytes on nutrient Kristensen, P., Søndergaard, M., Jeppesen, E., 1992. Resuspension in a shallow
dynamics, sedimentation, and resuspension. In: Jeppesen, E., Søndergaard, eutrophic lake. Hydrobiologia 228, 101–109.
Mo., Søndergaard, Ma. (Eds.), The Structuring Role of Submerged Krogerus, K., Ekholm, P., 2003. Phosphorus in settling matter and bottom
sediments in lakes loaded by agriculture. Hydrobiologia 492, 15–28.
Macrophytes in Lakes. Ecological studies. Springer–Verlag, New York,
pp. 197–214. Kufel, L., Kufel, I., 2002. Chara beds acting as nutrient sinks in shallow lakes—
Bengtsson, L., Hellstrom, T., 1992. Wild-induced resuspension in a small a review. Aquat. Bot. 72, 249–260.
shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 241, 163–172. Li, W., Huang, B., Li, R.R., 2002. Assessing the effects of fisheries development
on aquatic vegetation using GIS. Aquat. Bot. 73, 187–199.
Bloesch, J., 1994. A review of methods used to measure sediment resuspension.
Hydrobiologia 284, 13–18. Madsen, D., Chambers, P.A., James, W.F., et al., 2001. The interaction between
Bloesch, J., Burns, N.M., 1980. A critical review of sediment trap technique. water movement, sediment dynamics and submerged macrophytes. Hydro-
biologia 444, 71–84.
Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 42, 15–55.
Newman, S., Reddy, K.R., 1992. Sediment resuspension effects on alkaline
Carper, G.L., Bachmann, R.W., 1984. Wind resuspension of sediments in a
prairie lake. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41, 1763–1767. phosphates activity. Hydrobiologia 245, 75–86.
Evans, R.D., 1994. Empirical evidence of the importance of sediment resus- Peng, Y.H., Jian, Y.X., Ni, L.Y., 2003. Studies on the diversity of aquatic plants
in Lake Xilang. Guihaia 23, 211–216.
pension in lakes. Hydrobiologia 284, 5–12.
Gasith, A., 1975. Tripton sedimentation in eutrophic lakes-simple correction for Pluntke, T., Kozerski, H.P., 2003. Particle trapping on leaves and on the
the resuspended matter. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol. 19, 116–122. bottom in simulated submerged plant stands. Hydrobiologia 506/509,
Gu, X.H., Bai, X.L., Jiang, N., et al., 2006. Fishery development, regional 575–581.
Scheffer, M., 1998. Ecology of Shallow Lakes. Chapman & Hall, New York.
classification and functional positioning of Lake Taihu. Acta Ecol. Sin. 26
(7), 2247–2254. Søndergaard, M., Kristensen, P., Jeppesen, E., 1992. Phosphorus release from
Horppila, J., Nurminen, L., 2003. Effects of submerged macrophytes on resuspended sediment in the shallow and wind-exposed Lake Arresø,
sediment resuspension and internal phosphorus loading in Lake Hiidenvesi Denmark. Hydrobiologia 228, 91–99.
Vermaat, J.E., Santamaria, L., Roos, P.J., 2000. Water flow across and sediment
(southern Finland). Water Res. 37, 4468–4474.
Horppila, J., Nurminen, L., 2005. Effects of different macrophyte growth forms trapping in submerged macrophyte beds of contrasting growth form. Arch.
on sediment and P resuspension in a shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 545, Hydrobiol. 148, 549–562.
Wu, Q.L., 2001. On the sustainable development of fishery in East Taihu lake. J.
167–175.
James, W.F., Barko, J.W., Butler, M.G., 2004. Shear stress and sediment Lake Sci. 13 (4), 337–344.
resuspension in relation to submersed macrophyte biomass. Hydrobiologia Zambrano, L., Scheffer, M., Martinez-Ramos, M., 2001. Catastrophic response
515, 181–191. of lakes to benthivorous fish introduction. Oikos 94, 344–350.

Das könnte Ihnen auch gefallen