Beruflich Dokumente
Kultur Dokumente
There are many other subtle ways that we communicate (perhaps even unintentionally) with
others, for example the tone of our voice can give clues to our mood or emotional state,
whilst hand signals or gestures can add to a spoken message.
In written communication the sender and receiver are more distinct. Until recent times,
relatively few writers and publishers were very powerful when it came to communicating the
written word. Today we can all write and publish our ideas online, which has led to an
explosion of information and communication possibilities.
They will also seek out feedback from the receiver(s) as to how the message is understood
and attempt to correct any misunderstanding or confusion as soon as possible.
message. It serves as a vehicle for expressing desires, ideas and concepts and
Types
Interpersonal communication and public speaking are the two basic types of
signs and symbols are the major signals that make up verbal communication.
Words act as symbols, and signs are secondary products of the underlying
message and include things like tone of voice, blushing and facial expressions.
Purpose
Verbal communication has many purposes, but its main function is relaying a
syllable sounds to complex discussions and relies on both language and emotion
inquire, argue and discuss topics of all kinds. It is vital to teaching and learning,
Non-Verbal Communication
See also: Personal Appearance
Posture, or how you stand or sit, whether your arms are crossed, and so on;
Eye Contact, where the amount of eye contact often determines the level of trust
and trustworthiness;
Para-language, or aspects of the voice apart from speech, such as pitch, tone, and
speed of speaking;
Closeness or Personal Space (Proxemics), which determines the level of intimacy;
In Conclusion…
Non-verbal communication is an extremely complex yet integral part of
overall communication skills. However, people are often totally unaware of
their non-verbal behaviour.
A basic awareness of non-verbal communication strategies, over and above what is actually
said, can help to improve interaction with others. Knowledge of these signs can be used to
encourage people to talk about their concerns and can lead to a greater shared
understanding, which is, after all, the purpose of communication.
Linguistic Models
The following article is from The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979). It might be outdated or ideolo
gically biased.
Linguistic Models
patterns used in structural linguistics to describe a language and its various aspects (phonology,
grammar, lexicon) in order to define more accuratelylinguistic concepts and their relationships. Th
is helps to clarify the structures underlying the infinite variety of linguistic phenomena; sometimes
thestructures themselves are called models. Depending on their area of application, linguistic mo
dels are divided into phonological, morphological, syntactic,and semantic. In constructing models,
the means and methods of mathematical linguistics are used. Any linguistic model establishes su
ch things as theobjects corresponding to the data of direct observation, including a large number
of sounds, words, and sentences; objects constructed by the linguist(constructs) for descriptive p
urposes, consisting of sets of categories, markers, and elementary semantic structures whose siz
e and scope have beenrigorously limited from the outset.
If the initial material (“input”) of the investigation consists of sounds, words, and sentences, and th
e result (“output”) consists of categories and semanticstructures, the model is called analytical. S
uch an analytical model is a model of the category of gender, which provides an unambiguous re
solution ofdisputed questions. A word’s grammatical gender may be determined by the form of a
word; for example, Russian words ending in -a are usuallyfeminine, but the marker -a is not unam
biguous, as shown by the word papa, “daddy,” “pope,” or by meaning (words designating feminin
e beingsbelong to the feminine gender, but this marker is likewise not unambiguous, as shown by
German das Weib, “woman,” which belongs to the neutergender).
In the model of gender, each word is taken to have its system of forms (for example, declension o
f stol “table”: stol, stola, stolu), and it is known whichother word forms agree with the given word f
orm (as in etot stol, “this table”: etot stol, etogo stola). Two words, x (stol) and y (kakadu, “cockat
oo”),belong to one gender if, for every form x1 of word x and every word form z agreeing with x1, t
here will be found a form y1 of word y agreeing with z (etotkakadu, etogo kakadu), while the rever
se will be true for every form y11 of word y. This model makes it possible not only to resolve disput
ed questionsunambiguously but also to confront the category of gender with the category of part
of speech (whereby gender is “inserted” into the part of speech); toestablish which categories of o
ther parts of speech are structured isomorphically (analogously) with the gender of the noun (for
example, the category ofverb agreement); and to compare the category of gender in Russian and
other Indo-European languages with the category of grammatical class in, forexample, the Bantu
languages. Thus, analytical models are employed in language typology.
If the input material consists of categories and elementary semantic structures and the output con
sists of certain formal constructions, the model is calledsynthetic or generative (these models are
also called generative grammars). A generative model contains a certain hypothesis about a lang
uage’sinternal structure that is inaccessible to direct observation. The generative model is then te
sted by comparing a large number of objects deduced fromthe model with real linguistic facts. Thi
s permits the model to be classified and evaluated according to the degree of its correspondence
to the facts of thelanguage and according to the degree to which it reveals intuitively felt laws of t
he language (explanatory power). Since each model describes not awhole language but some on
e area or even a separate category of it, precise description of a language presupposes the simul
taneous use of severalmodels, relating both to the one area (for example, several complementary
models of the categories of part of speech, case, and gender) and todifferent areas.
REFERENCES
Apresian, Iu. D. Idei i metody sovremennoi strukturnoi lingvistiki. Moscow, 1966.
Revzin, I.I. Metod modelirovaniia i tipologiia slavianskikh iazykov. Moscow, 1967.
Marcus, S. Teoretiko-mnozhestvennye modeli iazykov. Moscow, 1970. (Translated from English.
)
Chomski, N. Aspekty teorii sintaksisa. Moscow, 1972. (Translated from English.)
I. I. REVZIN