Doctors, Scientists and Academics questioning the COVID narrative or the

measures that have been introduced.

To be clear the professionals listed below are challenging the COVID narrative
from various perspectives these include: The efficacy of wearing masks, The
efficacy of lockdowns, whether COVID exists, The prevalence of COVID, Herd
Immunity, Testing for COVID, Severity of COVID. The names represent just a
few of the many professionals questioning the information that is being
promoted and the measures that have been introduced.

Prof Dolores Cahill

Prof Judy Mikovits
Kulvinder Kaur MD @dockaurG
Stefan Baral MD Associate Professor @sdbaral
Ivor Cummins @FatEmperor
Prof Carl Heneghan @carlheneghan
Dr Vernon Coleman Retired.
Dr Mohammad Iqbal Adil
Prof Tim Hayward
Dr Waqar Rashid
Professor Michael Levitt (Nobel Prize winner) @MLevitt_NP2013
Dr. Stoyan Aleksov Pathologist
Prof John Lee Pathologist Retired
Dr James Todaro MD @JamesTodaro MD
Dr. Richard Urso ophthalmologist @richardursomd
Prof Didier Raoult Microbiologist @raoult_didier
Prof Francois Balloux @BallouxFrancois
Prof Johan Giesecke epidemiologist
Prof Tom Jefferson epidemiologist
Prof Anders Tegnell epidemiologist
Dr Soo Aleman Associate Professor
Dr Zac Cox BDS
Prof Andrew Kaufman MD, Professor of psychiatry, molecular biologist.
Dr. Marcus De Brun @indepdubnrth
Research Papers (Face Masks)
E. C. H. Lim R. et al (2006) Headaches and the N95 face‐mask amongst
healthcare providers. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1600-
0404.2005.00560.x

Jacobs, J. L. et al. (2009) “Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of
the common cold among health care workers in Japan: A randomized controlled
trial,” American Journal of Infection Control, Volume 37, Issue 5, 417 – 419.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19216002 N95-masked health-care
workers (HCW) were significantly more likely to experience headaches. Face
mask use in HCW was not demonstrated to provide benefit in terms of cold
symptoms or getting colds.
Cowling, B. et al. (2010) “Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus:
A systematic review,” Epidemiology and Infection, 138(4), 449-456.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-
infection/article/face-masks-to-prevent-transmission-of-influenza-virus-a-
systematic- review/64D368496EBDE0AFCC6639CCC9D8BC05 None of the
studies reviewed showed a benefit from wearing a mask, in either HCW or
community members in households (H). See summary Tables 1 and 2 therein.
bin-Reza et al. (2012) “The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission
of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence,” Influenza and Other
Respiratory Viruses 6(4), 257–267.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00307.x
“There were 17 eligible studies. … None of the studies established a conclusive
relationship between mask/respirator use and protection against influenza
infection.”
Smith, J.D. et al. (2016) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks
in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic
review and meta-analysis,” CMAJ Mar 2016
https://www.cmaj.ca/content/188/8/567 “We identified six clinical studies … .
In the meta-analysis of the clinical studies, we found no significant difference
between N95 respirators and surgical masks in associated risk of (a) laboratory
confirmed respiratory infection, (b) influenza-like illness, or (c) reported work-
place absenteeism.”
Offeddu, V. et al. (2017) “Effectiveness of Masks and Respirators Against
Respiratory Infections in Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-
Analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 65, Issue 11, 1 December 2017,
Pages 1934–1942, https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
The confirmed effectiveness of medical masks is crucially important for lower-
resource and emergency settings lacking access to N95 respirators. In such
cases, single-use medical masks are preferable to cloth masks, for which there is
no evidence of protection and which might facilitate transmission of pathogens
when used repeatedly without adequate sterilization. We found no clear benefit
of either medical masks or N95 respirators against pH1N1.
Radonovich, L.J. et al. (2019) “N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing
Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA.
2019; 322(9): 824–833.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2749214 “Among 2862
randomized participants, 2371 completed the study and accounted for 5180
HCW-seasons. … Among outpatient health care personnel, N95 respirators vs
medical masks as worn by participants in this trial resulted in no significant
difference in the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”
Long, Y. et al. (2020) “Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks
against influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J Evid Based Med.
2020; 1- 9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jebm.12381 “A
total of six RCTs involving 9,171 participants were included. There were no
statistically significant differences in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza,
laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infections, laboratory-confirmed
respiratory infection, and influenza-like illness using N95 respirators and surgical
masks. Meta-analysis indicated a protective effect of N95 respirators against
laboratory-confirmed bacterial colonization (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.43-0.78). The
use of N95 respirators compared with surgical masks is not associated with a
lower risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza.”

Zahid Mehmood Bahli J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad Apr-Jun 2009;21(2):166-70.

Does evidence based medicine support the effectiveness of surgical facemasks
in preventing postoperative wound infections in elective surgery?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20524498/ No significance difference in the
incidence of postoperative wound infection was observed between masks group
and groups operated with no masks.

Julii Suzanne Brainard et al (2020) Facemasks and similar barriers to prevent

respiratory illness such as COVID-19: A rapid systematic review
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.01.20049528v1
“Based on the RCTs we would conclude that wearing facemasks can be very
slightly protective against primary infection from casual community contact,
and modestly protective against household infections when both infected and
uninfected members wear facemasks.”

C Raina MacIntyre et al (2015) A cluster randomised trial of cloth masks

compared with medical masks in healthcare workers.
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577 This study is the first RCT of
cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an
important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention,
reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection.
The study was updated March 2020 this is part of the update: “Health workers
are asking us if they should wear no mask at all if cloth masks are the only
option. Our research does not condone health workers working unprotected.

We recommend that health workers should not work during the COVID-19
pandemic without respiratory protection as a matter of work health and safety.
In addition, if health workers get infected, high rates of staff absenteeism from
illness may also affect health system capacity to respond. Some health workers
may still choose to work in inadequate PPE. In this case, the physical barrier
provided by a cloth mask may afford some protection, but likely much less than
a surgical mask or a respirator.
It is important to note that some subjects in the control arm wore surgical
masks, which could explain why cloth masks performed poorly compared to the
control group. We also did an analysis of all mask wearers, and the higher
infection rate in cloth mask group persisted. The cloth masks may have been
worse in our study because they were not washed well enough – they may
become damp and contaminated. The cloth masks used in our study were
products manufactured locally, and fabrics can vary in quality. This and other
limitations were also discussed.

Shane Neilson CMAJ. 2016 May 17; 188(8): 606–607 The surgical mask is a bad
fit for risk reduction. “Western society has already emerged into a present
reality in which citizens are conditioned to want masks on the basis of media
representations of pandemics.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4868614/

Tom Jefferson, Carl Heneghan (2020) Masking lack of evidence with politics The
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine “It would appear that despite two decades
of pandemic preparedness, there is considerable uncertainty as to the value of
wearing masks. For instance, high rates of infection with cloth masks could be
due to harms caused by cloth masks, or benefits of medical masks.”
https://www.cebm.net/covid-19/masking-lack-of-evidence-with-politics/

E Person et al (2018) Randomized Controlled Trial Revue des Maladies

Respiratoires Volume 35, Issue 3 Pages 231-352 Effect of a surgical mask on six
minute walking distance https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29395560/ Wearing
a surgical mask modifies significantly and clinical dyspnoea without influencing
walked distance. Many consider dyspnoea as a mild symptom but it can cause
significant distress and anxiety, few sensations are as frightening as not being
able to get enough air. Shortness of breath, known medically as dyspnoea is
often described as an intense tightening in the chest, air hunger, difficulty
breathing, breathlessness or a feeling of suffocation.
Very strenuous exercise, extreme temperatures, obesity and higher altitude all
can cause shortness of breath in a healthy person. Outside of these examples,
shortness of breath is likely a sign of a medical problem.

Baskaran Chandrasekaran, Shifra Fernandes (2020) Medical Hypotheses

Volume 144: Exercise with facemask; Are we handling a devil's sword?" - A
physiological hypothesis.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987720317126?via%3
Dihub The study demonstrates potential complications associated with
facemasks during exercises. N95 respirators induces acidic environment which
in turn affects the immune and metabolic systems. Facemasks during exercise
may exacerbate the pathology of underlying chronic diseases. Further
depression, anxiety induced by poor oxygenation and vasodilatory status when
exercising with facemasks. The social exercisers should socially distance during
exercise rather than wearing masks.

Tze-Wah Kao et al (2004) J Formos Med Assoc. The physiological impact of

wearing an N95 mask during haemodialysis as a precaution against SARS in
patients with end-stage renal disease. Wearing an N95 mask for 4 hours during
HD significantly reduced PaO2 and increased respiratory adverse effects in ESRD
patients. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15340662/

Research Papers (Hydroxychloroquine)

Martin J Vincent et al Virol J. 2005; 2: 69 Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of

SARS coronavirus infection and spread.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV
infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells
are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus,
suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.

Nan Wang et al Phytomedicine. 2020 Sep 2 : 153333 Chloroquine and

hydroxychloroquine as ACE2 blockers to inhibit viropexis of 2019-nCoV Spike
pseudotyped virus, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7467095/
Study revealed that CQ and HCQ as ACE2 blockers inhibit the entrance of 2019-
nCoV pseudovirus into the cells, providing new insights into the use of CQ and
HCQ for 2019-nCoV treatment and further control.

Adam Brufsky J Med Virol. 2020 Apr 27 Hyperglycaemia, hydroxychloroquine,

and the COVID‐19 pandemic While we await larger randomized studies and
more analysis of patient subtypes to determine who, if anyone, will benefit from
hydroxychloroquine, in the context of this theoretical framework for COVID‐19
infection the results to date are supportive, although much caution should be
used in interpretation of these early small clinical trials.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7262330/
Lucy Catteau et al (2020) International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents Low-dose
Hydroxychloroquine Therapy and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-
19: A Nationwide Observational Study of 8075 Participants
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920303423#!
Compared to supportive care only, low-dose HCQ monotherapy was
independently associated with lower mortality in hospitalized patients with
COVID-19 diagnosed and treated early or later after symptom onset

Videos, Podcasts and E-Books

Dr. Andrew Kaufman
https://londonrealtv.libsyn.com/dr-andrew-kaufman-unmasking-the-lies-
around-covid-19-facts-vs-fiction-of-the-coronavirus-pandemic the American
medical doctor, Professor of psychiatry, molecular biologist, and expert witness.
He studied at Duke, M.I.T, and the Medical University of South Carolina, where
he conducted and published original research, and lectured to students,
residents, and fellows.Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Kaufman has
contradicted the mainstream media, by stating that the coronavirus is NOT
causing a new disease, that there is no evidence of increased mortality, and that
modern medicine is the leading cause of death.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_uSZAWQmMM David E. Martin Founder

and Chairman of M·CAM Inc., the international leader in innovation finance,
trade, and intangible asset finance.

https://youtu.be/dUOFeVIrOPg Prof Karl Friston: up to 80% not even

susceptible to Covid-19

Professor Michael Levitt https://youtu.be/bl-sZdfLcEk Professor of Structural

Biology at the Stanford School of Medicine, and winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize
for Chemistry for “the development of multiscale models for complex chemical
systems.” Professor Levitt explains why he thinks indiscriminate lockdown
measures as “a huge mistake.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya https://youtu.be/FcnQPInwVNQ Lockdowns, Vaccines and

Debt. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a Professor of Medicine and Professor (by Courtesy)
of Economics at Stanford University. They discuss the international response to
the COVID crisis, delving into the efficacy and mental health impacts of
widespread, long-term lockdowns (as seen in Victoria), the likelihood of a
vaccine development and the extraordinary levels of government debt that has
fuelled the COVID recovery.

Professor Johan Giesecke https://youtu.be/bfN2JWifLCY one of the world’s

most senior epidemiologists. Why lockdowns are the wrong policy!

Professor Carl Heneghan https://youtu.be/dxLDJJb1_KI is Director of the Centre

for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford Prof Carl Heneghan: can we trust Covid-
19 death numbers?

Thomas Ernest Woods Jr. senior fellow at the Mises Institute.

https://youtu.be/6RDffMCAujg The Fact-Free Lockdown Hysteria
http://www.wrongaboutlockdown.com/

Tony Robbins https://youtu.be/YgP_Au5RZVw Unmasking The Science You

Aren’t Hearing On TV | COVID-19 Facts from the Frontline.Discussion about
coronavirus with a 7-person panel of highly qualified researchers, an
experienced epidemiologist, a Nobel Laureate, and M.D.s testing and treating
patients on the frontlines. Together, they reveal the evidence-based research

Tony Robbins https://youtu.be/1CZzdSzUZLE Tony Robbins interviews Senator

Scott Jensen, a family physician from Minnesota, about the CDC’s guidelines for
reporting COVID-19 deaths – and how some hospitals may be over-reporting
fatalities in order to receive more funding

Prof Anders Tegnell https://youtu.be/xh9wso6bEAc Swedish Covid-19 chief

epidemiologist

Professor Karol Sikora https://youtu.be/EQ-ATT_Cd6M Why We Might Not

Need A Vaccine for COVID-19
Face Masks - Helpful or Hoax? https://youtu.be/XFnUGSr3fw0
Dr. John Campbell https://youtu.be/2uzXHnUViro Hydroxychloroquine,
evidence of efficacy

Dr Mobeen Syed https://youtu.be/WkkDgcwmzR4 Is Herd-Immunity Achieved

In Some Places?

Dr Mobeen Syed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ld3GYxytdsY COVID19

Vaccines

Dr Mobeen Syed https://youtu.be/7GRDVBiSE9U COVID-19 Severity - Study

Reveals Cellular Behavior

Del Bigtree https://www.bitchute.com/video/ypLjmXQoLygi/ host Del Bigtree

and son, Ever, conducted a test, using an OSHA-approved Carbon-Dioxide
meter, which revealed something about masks which YouTube, Facebook, and
other video platforms are trying very hard to censor

London Real https://www.bitchute.com/video/KD3nHfgrDCDP/ EXPOSING THE

TRUTH BEHIND AMERICA'S COVID-19 STRATEGY

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5i9d9XIkiCnX/ Exposing hidden agendas

behind vaccines

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4u7rt61YeGox/ Why are videos banned-

indoctrination

Corbett Report https://youtu.be/rtirKL_XmGg who will fact check the fact

checkers.

Corbett Report https://youtu.be/wQSYdAX_9JY How Bill Gates Monopolized

Global Health

Corbett Report https://youtu.be/eDzGjvmDyJg Corona World Mario Type Game

– Promoting the MSM narrative – Killing the Anti-Maskers and others who might
be spreading the virus including children